DOCSLIB.ORG

Cities Partnering with Local Government

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cities Partnering with Local Government Cities that are interested in or already partnering with other local governments to advance climate solutions in the areas of electricity, buildings, or fleets Large Cities (250,000+ people) Madison WI 250,000 Dane County convenes meetings with cities throughout Dane County. Buffalo NY 258,612 Buffalo's Energy Master Plan is part of the Five Cities Energy Plan, a collaborative strategy document that envisions a more energy efficient and sustainable future for the five largest Upstate New York cities. Durham NC 263,016 We are interested in exploring partnering with Durham County and other local governments to develop commercial scale solar farms, group purchasing, etc. Chula Vista CA 267,000 As a member of LGSEC we provide regulatory feedback to the state on measures related to clean energy. We are also a founding member of the San Diego Climate Collaborative and South Bay Energy Action Collaborative. We would be open to any other partnerships that can bring more clean energy to our community. Toledo OH 280,000 Toledo is currently working with Lucas County officials along surrounding area city governments on Further environmental issues. Additionally, The city works with Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments (TMACOG) Orlando FL 282,000 We are participating in the Renewable Energy RFI and plan to collaborate with other cities to achieve our goals. Anchorage AK 296,000 As the local government, the MOA is working to install renewable energy on several locations and is considering a renewable energy goal through the Climate Action Plan. Santa Ana CA 338,000 City is member of the Orange County Cities Energy Efficiency partnership with SCE and SoCalGas, and sharing best practices including renewable energy solutions. Oakland CA 424,000 We are working with the other cities and County via the CCA program. Raleigh NC 458,880 The City actively participates in various public organizations that work to advance renewable energy and climate solutions at local, state, regional, and federal levels. The City maintains good working relationships with regional local governments as we work together on resiliency programs. Long Beach CA 470,130 The city of Long Beach is interested in partnering with local governments to advance climate solutions through renewable electricity. The City is currently researching and considering Community Choice Aggregation options that may lead to partnerships with other cities. Kansas City MO 478,000 The City will encourage other local governments to procure renewable energy thru KCP&L's new renewables program, when it is approved by the MO Public Service Commission. Mesa AZ 496,401 Municipalities are working with Salt River Project, the local utility company, to explore community renewable energy projects. Las Vegas NV 640,174 Yes, the City is interested in looking at opportunities to partner with other local and regional governments (as well as state agencies) to purchase, acquire, and develop renewable energy resources. It currently does so with the Colorado River Commission of Nevada. Portland OR 650,000 Portland participates in the League of Oregon Cities (LOC) and plays an important role in shaping the energy policy agenda of that group in Salem. We also participate in multiple peer city networks, such as USCM, C40, USDN, CNCA. Boston MA 685,094 The City of Boston is coordinating the release of a multi-city Request for Information to explore collective purchasing of renewable energy in order to bring down costs and incentivize more development, through a Virtual Power Purchase Agreement (VPPA). As well as major cities across the US, including Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, Orlando, FL, Portland, OR and Evanston, IL, we have recruited several local governments: Melrose, Arlington, Somerville, Cambridge and Manchester, MA; Nashua, NH; South Portland and Portland, ME. The Metropolitan Area Planning Council, the regional planning agency serving the people who live and work in the 101 cities and towns of Metro Boston, has also signed onto the RFI. Washington DC 693,972 The District of Columbia works closely with the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG) on a regional approach to mitigating GHGs. MWCOG represents 17 regional jurisdictions including and surrounding Washington, DC, and has established ambitious goals to reduce regional GHGs 20% below 2005 levels by 2020 and 80% by 2050 region-wide. The District has also partnered with MWCOG and several Federal agencies on climate adaptation planning activities, driven in large part by the now-rescinded Federal Executive Order 13653, which mandated that Federal agencies take actions to enhance climate preparedness and resilience. MWCOG supports local governments in developing renewable energy plans, policies, and initiatives, particularly for solar. Additionally, MWGCOG helps local government install renewable energy systems on municipal facilities, supports efforts to create a robust regional solar market, and seeks to foster more low-cost solar deployments. Beyond the region, the District is part of the C40 network of cities, the Carbon Neutral Cities Alliance, and 100 Resilient Cities and works in peer networks to advance climate and renewable energy solutions. For example, the District is part of a thermal decarbonization pilot program funded by CNCA in collaboration with three other leading-edge cities (NYC, Boulder, CO, and Burlington, VT) to study market potential and market deployment of air source heat pumps for the small residential sector. Denver CO 700,000 We work in partnership with U.S. and Canadian cities through the Urban Sustainability Directors Network and Climate Mayors, and with cities elsewhere through ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability. San Francisco CA 890,000 San Francisco engages with regional, statewide, national and international local governments across all distributed energy resources topic areas (EE, RE, Storage, ZEVs). We also coordinate closely on decarbonization policy, regulation and initiatives. Austin TX 949,587 Public power association, and USDN San José CA 1,046,079 Mayor Liccardo is an active member of initiatives like America's Pledge and the Sustainable Cities Initiative, and groups like Climate Mayors, C40, the US Conference of Mayors, and Champion Mayors. Phoenix AZ 1,600,000 Working with AEE and other cities to perform group purchase through the utilities. Also working with the Urban Sustainability Directors Network which includes 150 North American cities. Medium Cities (100,000 – 250,000 people) Las Cruces NM 101,000 working to get CCE for state with other governments and stakeholders South Bend IN 101,735 South Bend is involved in coalitions such as Michiana Area Council of Governments, Earth Charter Indiana Mayors' Climate Summit, and Indiana University's Environmental Resilience Institute, in Indiana, and several other national and international organizations, which provide support and networking to local governments pursuing climate solutions. Due to our involvement in these organizations, we are well-positioned to begin partnerships with other local governments. Erie PA 101,786 We are open to discussions on this topic. Boulder CO 108,000 Through dozens of regional, national and international partnerships and coalitions. Namely USDN, CNCA, and CC4CA Lansing MI 117,000 City is currently starting work on a sustainability plan which will include consideration of this item. Columbia MO 120,000 We do these efforts through the Urban Sustainability Directors Network Columbia SC 133,358 Economies of scale would be helpful for all involved. Dayton OH 141,000 Dayton Regional Green (DRG) Program partnership with Montgomery County. Bridgeport CT 145,000 Shared solar on a large scale Torrance CA 147,175 The City is working with the South Bay Cities Council of Governments to explore partnerships and programs with other local governments. Alexandria VA 150,000 City participates in regional climate initiatives led by MWCOG and NVRC Clarksville TN 150,287 same as above Pembroke Pines FL 162,000 Willing to participate Fort Collins CO 167,000 Through shared ownership (4 cities) for our electric generating authority; Through sharing best practices via numerous networks Tempe AZ 170,000 In discussions with neighboring cities about potential collaborations. Salt Lake City UT 192,672 Partnering on an upcoming RFP to secure a renewable energy resource via PPA for both public and private customers. Also, we coordinate extensively within Utah and nationally with local governments. One example is the NREL Solar Energy Innovation Network. Click here for more information Aurora IL 200,456 Aurora is part of the Metropolitan Mayors Caucus and the Fox Valley Sustainability Network to create a healthy, sustainable and vibrant environment. Rochester NY 210,000 The City can build on existing partnerships local and regional governments to advance climate solutions focused on renewable electricity. Examples of existing partnerships are as follows. The City helped to implement the Finger Lakes Regional Sustainability Plan, developed as a collaborative regional project through the NYSERDA Cleaner Greener Communities Program in 2013, and will continue to engage with Monroe County, Genesee Finger Lakes region and Upstate New York communities to share best practices to continue to work together to strengthen the climate resiliency of the region. The City has been part of the New York Power Authority's (NYPA) Five Cities Energy Program, a partnership which includes Rochester, Albany, Buffalo, Syracuse and Yonkers. With
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ohio Contract Usage 2017-2018
    Ohio Contract Usage 2017-2018 MHEC CONTRACTS leverage the potential volume of institutions. Additionally, because of MHEC’s statutory the region’s purchasing power while saving institutions status, many of these contracts can also be adopted time and money by simplifying the procurement process. for use by K-12 districts and schools, as well as cities, The2 contracts0162017 provide competitive solutions established states, and local governments. Smaller institutions in accordance with public procurement laws thereby benefit from these contracts as they allow these negating the institution’s need to conduct a competitive institutions to negotiate from the same pricing and terms sourcing event. By offering a turnkey solution with the normally reserved for larger institutions. MHEC relies on ability to tailor the already negotiated contract to match institutional experts to participate in the negotiations, ANNUAL the institution’s specific needs and requirements, MHEC sharing strategies and tactics on dealing with specific contractsREPORT shift some of the negotiating power back to the contractual issues and vendors. HARDWARE CONTRACTS Northwest State Community HARDWARE CONTRACTS Central Cleveland College Metropolitan School Higher to theEducation Member States K-12 Ohio Business College Central Local School District Antioch University Alexander Local School Ohio Northern University District Central Primary School Ashland University Ohio State University Aurora City School District Cincinnati Public Schools Capital University Ohio University
    [Show full text]
  • Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments
    TOLEDO METROPOLITAN AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO Audit Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2019 Board of Trustees Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments 300 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, Suite 300 Toledo, Ohio 43604 We have reviewed the Independent Auditor’s Report of the Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments, Lucas County, prepared by Charles E. Harris & Associates, Inc., for the audit period July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. Based upon this review, we have accepted these reports in lieu of the audit required by Section 117.11, Revised Code. The Auditor of State did not audit the accompanying financial statements and, accordingly, we are unable to express, and do not express an opinion on them. Our review was made in reference to the applicable sections of legislative criteria, as reflected by the Ohio Constitution, and the Revised Code, policies, procedures and guidelines of the Auditor of State, regulations and grant requirements. The Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments is responsible for compliance with these laws and regulations. Keith Faber Auditor of State Columbus, Ohio February 14, 2020 Efficient Effective Transparent This page intentionally left blank. TOLEDO METROPOLITAN AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS LUCAS COUNTY AUDIT REPORT For the Year Ending June 30, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE Independent Auditors' Report……………………………………………………………………...………………………… 1-3 Management's Discussion and Analysis……………………………………………………..……………………………… 4-10 Basic Financial Statements: Statement of Net
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Department of Transportation • News Release ODOT Seeking Public Comment on Transportation Plan
    Ohio Department of Transportation • News Release DIVISION OF COMMUNICATIONS 1980 West Broad Street • Columbus, Ohio 43223 www.transportation.ohio.gov ODOT Seeking Public Comment on Transportation Plan The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) hereby notifies all interested persons that a draft long range transportation plan called Access Ohio 2040, an update to Ohio’s long-range transportation plan, is available for review and comment. Access Ohio 2040 is a vision for Ohio’s future transportation system that includes eleven recommendations which will guide, inform, and support ODOT’s policies and investment strategies in the coming years. You may provide your comments at www.accessohio2040.com or by visiting one of the locations identified below. Comments concerning Access Ohio 2040 may be submitted through the above website, by e- mail [email protected], or by mail: Jennifer Townley Division of Planning Attn: Charles Dyer Ohio Department of Transportation Mail Stop #3280 1980 West Broad Street Columbus, OH 43223 Written comments must be received by the close of business on January 15, 2014 ODOT Offices: ODOT District 1: 1885 North McCullough St. – Lima, Ohio 45801 ODOT District 2: 317 East Poe Rd. – Bowling Green, Ohio 43402 ODOT District 3: 906 Clark Avenue – Ashland, Ohio 44805 ODOT District 4: 2088 S. Arlington Road. – Akron, Ohio 44306 ODOT District 5: 9600 Jacksontown Road – Jacksontown, OH 43030 ODOT District 6: 400 E. William Street – Delaware, Ohio 43015 ODOT District 7: 1001 Saint Marys Avenue - Sidney, Ohio 45365 ODOT District 7, Poe Avenue Facility: 5994 Poe Avenue – Dayton, Ohio 45414 ODOT District 8: 505 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments Lucas County Single
    TOLEDO METROPOLITAN AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS LUCAS COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE Independent Auditor’s Report ....................................................................................................................... 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis ....................................................................................................... 5 Basic Financial Statements: Statement of Net Position – Major Enterprise Fund ............................................................................ 11 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position – Major Enterprise Fund .............. 12 Statement of Cash Flows – Major Enterprise Fund ............................................................................. 13 Statement of Net Position – Fiduciary Fund ........................................................................................ 14 Notes to the Basic Financial Statements ................................................................................................... 15 Schedule of Fringe Benefit Cost Rate ........................................................................................................ 27 Schedule of Indirect Cost Rate .................................................................................................................. 28 Schedule of Revenue and Expenses for US Department of Transportation Funds .................................. 29 Schedule of Federal Awards Expenditures ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Alternative Manual Landuse Forecasting Methods Used in Transportation Planning
    I I I I 78-5866 KHISTY, Clement Jotindrakumar, 1928- AN EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE MANUAL LANDUSE FORECASTING METHODS USED IN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1977 Engineering, civil University Microfilms International,Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 AN EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE MANUAL LANDUSE FORECASTING METHODS USED IN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DISSERTATION Presented In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University Hy Clement Jotindrahumar Khisty, B.S., M.S., M.C.P. » » * * » The Ohio State University 1977 Reading Committee: Approved By Dr. Zoltan A. Nemeth Dr. Slobodan Mitric A. Nemeth, Adviser Dr. Burkhard von Rabenau Spartmenfc of Civil Engineering Dr. Joseph Treiterer ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation has roots going back at least to 1970. Many people have contributed, in different ways and at different times, to its formulation. Among them are the staffs of the transportation and landuse planning agencies involved. The literature furnished by these agencies has been invaluable. The summaries of the landuse fore­ casting and distribution methods contained in this dissertation are excerpted from this literature. The author would like to express his appreciation to all these agencies. Thanks are also extended to Dr. Michael Godfrey, Dr. Slobodan Mitric, Dr. Zoltan Nemeth and Dr. Burkhard von Rabenau for their sin­ cere interest, encouragement and guidance throughout the course of this research. My deepest debt is to my friend Beverly Pritchett. She not only typed the final document, but also took up the responsibility of editing and proofreading the entire dissertation. VITA July k, 1928......... Born - Nagpur, Maharashtra, India I9H8...............
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Stabilization OVER-THE-RHINE LANG BUILDING, MT
    Vol 3. Issue 6 - Port Progress Sign Up for our Newsletter [email protected] A project update of the Port of Greater Cincinnati Development Authority Historic Stabilization OVER-THE-RHINE LANG BUILDING, MT. HEALTHY THEATER LIVE TO SEE ANOTHER CENTURY The Hamilton County Landbank's Historic Structure Stabilization program assists in the stabilization of important, historic, vacant buildings across Hamilton County, in order to preserve them for future re-use. The Landbank has completed four stabilizations this year so far, including two properties in Lower Price Hill, as well as 1706 Lang St. building in Over-the-Rhine, and the Mt. Healthy Theater on Hamilton Avenue. 1706 Lang: Built in 1855, the three-story brick structure was crumbling into the street and slated for demolition in early spring 2015, until an outpouring of community support successfully halted its demise. The City of Cincinnati partnered with the Hamilton County Landbank to stabilize the property at a total cost of $134,600. The Landbank managed the stabilization project, which was completed in June. Vol 3. Issue 6 - Port Progress Sign Up for our Newsletter [email protected] The Mt. Healthy Theater: Known as the Main Theater dating back to 1915, operated by the Blum family, the neighborhood cinema thrived through the 40s and 50s as a prime entertainment spot with a focus on family-friendly films. The theater closed in 1971 and aside from a stint as an auction house, suffered years of neglect with the building falling into disrepair. The Port Authority determined the building to be of sufficient historical significance and worked with the City of Mount Healthy to stabilize it from further deterioration until a new use can be found for it.
    [Show full text]
  • Attendance Detail Report, April 16, 2021
    Sunshine Laws Certified Training Training Requested by Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments Cisco WebEx Event ID:180709452765237 / Event Key: 1792599234 April 16, 2021 8:45 a m. - 12:30 p m. Designee on behalf of:(Enter Attorney NAMES only, NOT Board Attendance Attendance First Name Last Name Bar # Title Company Members, City Council, etc.) Join Time Leave Time Duration Minutes Duration Hours Hiwot Abraha 8:43 am New 12:19 pm New 216 3.60 York Time York Time Joseph Adamovich Township Trustee Knox Township, Jefferson 8:41 am New 12:20 pm New 218 3.63 County York Time York Time Cecelia Adams City Council Member Toledo City Council 9:34 am New 12:20 pm New 165 2.75 York Time York Time Rebecca Advent 0095171 Assistant Director of Law City of Akron 8:55 am New 12:19 pm New 204 3.40 York Time York Time Rebecca Advent 0095171 Assistant Director of Law City of Akron 8:46 am New 8:49 am New 2 0.03 York Time York Time Jennifer Allen Executive Assistant TMACOG 8:40 am New 11:09 am New 149 2.48 York Time York Time Kurt Althouse Police Chief Vandalia Division of Police 8:43 am New 12:19 pm New 215 3.58 York Time York Time Jodey Altier trustee Perry & Associates 9:05 am New 9:06 am New 1 0.02 York Time York Time Jill Amos Fiscal Officer Butler Township Paul Lease 8:48 am New 12:19 pm New 210 3.50 Matt Hall York Time York Time Tom Sanor George Anagnostou Treasurer/CFO Strongsville City Schools Richard Micko 8:49 am New 12:19 pm New 210 3.50 Laura Wolfe-Housum York Time York Time Michelle Bissell Sherry Buckner-Sallee Seth Roberts thomas Anderson
    [Show full text]
  • Toledo—Continued Strength in Economic Growth
    TOLEDO, OHIO MSA | NOVEMBER 2016 Toledo—Continued Strength in Economic Growth The economy of the Toledo metropolitan area has continued to improve in 2016 as demand for automobiles—particularly SUVs and crossovers— remains high. From March 2015 to March 2016, employment grew at a faster rate in the Toledo area than in the nation as a whole. In the latest data, Toledo’s unemployment rate and rate of home price growth were nearly the same as those of the nation, and output per capita continued to grow. However, it is likely that Toledo’s growth will slow down in 2017 because the demand for automobiles is no longer rising, and the region is not seeing growth in financial activities and professional and business services. METRO AREA SNAPSHOT Credit Card Unemployment Rate Median Home Values Employment Delinquency Rates September One-year September One-year March One-year 2016:Q2 One-year 2016 change 2016 change 2016 change change (thousands) Toledo 5.1 0.3 $103,000 5.3% 294 2.4% 6.8 –0.6 Ohio 4.8 0.2 $122,900 3.8% 5,326 1.8% 6.8 –0.2 Nearby metro area average 4.6 0.1 $139,340 3.8% 1,174 2.1% 6.6 –0.2 United States 5.0 –0.1 $189,400 5.5% 141,231 1.9% 7.4 –0.2 After falling sharply for the past three months, the area’s unemployment rate is now back to where it was in April. Percent UNEMPLOYMENT RATE 14 Metro-level unemployment rates can move up and down sharply due to 12 — Toledo sample and modeling error.
    [Show full text]
  • A Moment of Truth: Ohio’S Transportation Funding Problem, and How to Solve It
    A Moment of Truth: Ohio’s Transportation Funding Problem, and How to Solve It. Better Transportation for Working and Living FEBRUARY 2019 Fix Our Roads Ohio — Case Statement As Ohio addresses the economic and social challenges of the 21st Century, the state faces a major shortage of reliable funding for our state’s roads and bridges. Unless action is taken soon to address the issue, the system will continue to fall into disrepair and become further congested – damaging the overall vitality of our state and the people who live here. A diverse group of Ohioans with a shared interest in the future of our state’s economy and lifestyle has come together to ask Ohio policy makers to focus on our state’s transportation funding structure and enact solutions. Fix Our Roads Ohio (FOR Ohio) is a coalition of stakeholders that have united in an effort to educate state leaders on the critical needs of Ohio’s transportation infrastructure, and to advocate for a dedicated funding solution that provides long-term, smart investment in Ohio’s transportation future. Our state’s economy and quality of life are directly Overview tied to the quality of our transportation system. The Ohio has one of the largest and most active transportation high volume of passenger vehicles and commercial systems in the United States, with 262,350 total road lane freight traffic flowing through the state every day miles and 44,657 bridges. Ohio is located within one day’s supports businesses, provides jobs and ultimately drive of 60% of the population of the United States and drives Ohio’s economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions About Transit in the Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments (TMACOG) Region
    Frequently Asked Questions about Transit in the Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments (TMACOG) Region Public transportation is a complicated industry that is political, expensive, and necessary. It is political because there are geographic areas in our region that do not need or want certain types of transit. It is expensive because moving people around is costly. Public transit is necessary because it provides personal mobility, reduces air pollution and road congestion, and can foster economic development through high capacity transit investments. This summary seeks to answer several of the most commonly asked questions about public transportation in the TMACOG region which encompasses Lucas and Wood counties in Ohio and southern Monroe County in Michigan. 1. What is public transportation? Public transportation in our area consists of a variety of services including: buses, subsidized taxis, van pool services, and paratransit services for senior citizens and people with disabilities. Public transit in other areas also includes: trolleys, light rail, commuter trains, streetcars, bus rapid transit, cable cars, ferries and water taxies, and monorails and tramways. 2. Who rides transit? There are generally two types of transit riders: transit‐dependent riders and choice riders. Choice riders own or could easily own their own vehicle. Transit‐dependent riders do not have reliable access to a vehicle and have limited access to other means of transportation. Some examples of choice riders include commuters and people going to a sporting event using a shuttle service. Some examples of transit‐dependent populations include minors under the age of 16, seniors who no longer drive, individuals with a disability that impacts their ability to drive, and individuals who cannot afford a vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio's 5310 Program at a Glance
    OHIO's SECTION 5310 PROGRAM The Section 5310 Program exists to enhance the mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities. In Ohio, there are (11) agencies that administer the funds for their at a glance federally determined regions. The table below outlines the different programs and who you should contact if you are interested in applying for funding. Eligible Projects Computer Preventive Transit-related Mobility Administering Agency Program Contact Region Vehicles Operating Hardware/S Equipment How to Apply Website Maintenance Infrastructure Management oftware Project Selection is Bi- Jeff Gardner, Planner Summit & Akron Metropolitan Area Annually, contact the Section 5310 Program | [email protected] Portage Transportation Study (AMATS) Program Rep for more AMATS (330)375 - 2436 Counties information Kentucky Ohio West Virginia Saleem Salameh, Director Lawrence Unknown Interstate Planning Commission [email protected] County Contact Program Rep for more information (KYOVA) (304) 523 - 7434 Greene, Bob Steinbach Miami Valley Regional Planning Miami, Section 5310 Program | [email protected] TBA Commission (MVRPC) Montgomery MVRPC (937) 531 - 6531 Counties Mary Ann Frantz, Manager Franklin & Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Section 5310 Program | [email protected] Delaware TBA Commission (MORPC) MORPC (614) 233 - 4156 Counties Jim Thompson, Program Annual Application Northeast Ohio Area Coordinating Manager Cuyahoga, Period: Section 5310 Program | Agency (NOACA) [email protected] Medina & Lake January
    [Show full text]
  • For the Year Ended December 31, 2000
    OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM For the Year Ended December 31, 2000 35 North Fourth Street, 1st Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215 Telephone 614-466-4514 800-282-0370 Facsimile 614-728-7398 Board of Trustees Ohio Public Employees Deferred Compensation Program We have reviewed the Independent Auditor's Report of the Ohio Public Employees Deferred Compensation Program, Franklin County, prepared by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the audit period January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000. Based upon this review, we have accepted this report in lieu of the audit required by Section 117.11, Revised Code. The Auditor of State did not audit the accompanying financial statements and, accordingly, we are unable to express, and do not express an opinion on them. Our review was made in reference to the applicable sections of legislative criteria, as reflected by the Ohio Constitution, and the Revised Code, policies, procedures and guidelines of the Auditor of State, regulations and grant requirements. The Ohio Public Employees Deferred Compensation Program is responsible for compliance with these laws and regulations. JIM PETRO Auditor of State July 10, 2001 This Page is Intentionally Left Blank. OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the year ended December 31, 2000 Prepared by: Virginia Shimrock Executive Director Paul D Miller Assistant Director-Finance 2000 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 1 2 OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTORY
    [Show full text]