An Evaluation of Alternative Manual Landuse Forecasting Methods Used in Transportation Planning

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Evaluation of Alternative Manual Landuse Forecasting Methods Used in Transportation Planning I I I I 78-5866 KHISTY, Clement Jotindrakumar, 1928- AN EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE MANUAL LANDUSE FORECASTING METHODS USED IN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1977 Engineering, civil University Microfilms International,Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 AN EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE MANUAL LANDUSE FORECASTING METHODS USED IN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DISSERTATION Presented In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University Hy Clement Jotindrahumar Khisty, B.S., M.S., M.C.P. » » * * » The Ohio State University 1977 Reading Committee: Approved By Dr. Zoltan A. Nemeth Dr. Slobodan Mitric A. Nemeth, Adviser Dr. Burkhard von Rabenau Spartmenfc of Civil Engineering Dr. Joseph Treiterer ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation has roots going back at least to 1970. Many people have contributed, in different ways and at different times, to its formulation. Among them are the staffs of the transportation and landuse planning agencies involved. The literature furnished by these agencies has been invaluable. The summaries of the landuse fore­ casting and distribution methods contained in this dissertation are excerpted from this literature. The author would like to express his appreciation to all these agencies. Thanks are also extended to Dr. Michael Godfrey, Dr. Slobodan Mitric, Dr. Zoltan Nemeth and Dr. Burkhard von Rabenau for their sin­ cere interest, encouragement and guidance throughout the course of this research. My deepest debt is to my friend Beverly Pritchett. She not only typed the final document, but also took up the responsibility of editing and proofreading the entire dissertation. VITA July k, 1928......... Born - Nagpur, Maharashtra, India I9H8................ B.S., Civil Engineering, Nagpur University, Nagpur, India 19k8-1957 .......... Civil Engineer, Department of Public Works and Electricity, India 1958-1959 .......... West German Government Fellowship 1959-196 9 .......... Officer in the Department of Technical Education, Ministry of Education, India 1970................ M.S., Civil Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 1970-1973 .......... Transportation Engineer, Ohio-Kentucky- Indiana Regional Planning Authority, Cincinnati, Ohio 1973................ M.C.P., University of Cincinnati, Cin­ cinnati, Ohio 1973-1971* ........... Senior Transportation Engineer, Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission, Columbus, Ohio 197*1—1975 .......... Teaching Associate, Department of Civil Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1975- .............. Principal Planner, Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments, Toledo, Ohio PUBLICATIONS Some Selected Publications are: "Transportation Pooling, 11 Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Govern­ ments, Toledo, Ohio, February, 1976. iii "Transit Development in Central Ohio,” Traffic Engineering, Vol. U4, No. 1 0 , pp. 16-19, July, 197^. "Transportation Planning Process: Operations Plan," OKI Regional Planning Authority, Cincinnati, Ohio, April, 1972. "Structural Steel Tables," Asia Publishing House, London, U.K., 1972. FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Civil Engineering Studies in-Transportation Engineering. Professors Michael B. Godfrey, Slobodan Mitric and Zoltan Nemeth Studies in Urban Economics. Professor Burkhard von Rabenau Studies in City and Regional Planning. Professors William Sims and Daniel Czamanski Studies in Transportation Geography. Professor Howard Gauthier Studies in Urban Sociology. Professor Kent Schwirian TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................... ii VTTA ................................... iii LIST OF TABLES....................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES ........ ....................... ix INTRODUCTION ......................................... 1 Chapter I. THE GENERAL PROBLEM............................ 2 The Planning Process. ....................... 2 The Problem................................. 3 Purpose and Scope of Research .................. 7 Research Approach ........ 7 Organization of This Research .................. 9 N o t e s ....................................... 10 II. THE NATURE OF PLANNING MODELS................... 11 Background ..... ......................... 11 Urban Spatial M o d e l s ......................... 11 Classification of M o d e l s ..................... 13 Characteristics of the Landuse Forecast and Landuse P l a n .............................. 17 Classification of Landuse Models .............. 18 Critique and Conclusions..................... 20 N o t e s ....................................... 23 III. SURVEY OF LANDUSE FORECASTING METHODS............ 25 Introduction ................................ 25 General Review . .......................... 25 Outlines of Ten Landuse Models ................ 28 Structural Linkages of the M o d e l s .............. Ul N o t e s ....................................... U7 v IV. A TEST OF TWO RESIDENTIAL LANDUSE MO D E L S ........... 1*9 Introduction .......................... 1*9 Methodological Problems....................... 50 Data Sources and their U s e ................... 51 Model Performance and the U - T e s t .............. 51 The Density-Saturation Gradient Method (DSGM) . 53 The Toledo M ethod............................ 65 Conclusions ..... TO N o t e s ....................................... 7U V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND GUIDELINES.................. 75 O v e r v i e w ................................... 75 General Guidelines Pertaining to Landuse Planning................................ 76 Specific Guidelines .......................... 8l Conclusions........................ 86 N o t e s ....................................... 88 APPENDIX A. SUMMARIES OF LANDUSE FORECASTING METHODS.......... 89 Akron, O h i o .............................. 89 Austin, T e x a s ............................... 99 Canton, O h i o ................................ 105 Chicago, Illinois ............................ 110 Columbus, O h i o .............................. 122 Kansas City, Missouri......................... 132 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma............ ll*3 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania................... 150 Rockford, Illinois .......................... 159 Toledo, O h i o ................................ 162 N o t e s ....................................... 175 B. DATA AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE D S G M ............... 176 C. DATA AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TOLEDO METHOD .... 185 BIBLIOGRAPHY........................ 187 vi LIST OF TABLES Page 1. Landuse Studies Investigated ...................... 26 2. Residential Development Factors .................. 6l 3. U-Test at Ring and Census Tract L e v e l ............. 6k U. Capacity Landuse Projections by Planning Areas in City of T o l e d o ............................ &7 5. Development Cycle: Estimated Years Required to Achieve Given State of Development ........... 6? 6. Forecast Growth of Dwelling Units in Planning Areas. 68 7. Forecast and Actual Population for 1 9 7 k ........... 69 8. U-Test at Planning Area L e v e l .................... 71 9. U-Test at Census Tract Level ...................... 72 10. 1970 Travis County, Texas, Landuse With Projections to 1980 and 1990 (in acres).................. 102 11. Analysis of Existing Landuse Patterns Using Density- Saturation Gradient Method .................. 117 12. Allocating District Population to Zones Using Density-Saturation Gradient Method ........... 120 13. Employment by Industrial Category, Kansas City Metropolitan Region, 1970-1980-2000 ........... 138 lU. 1995 Projected Population by City, Association of Central Oklahoma Governments................ lU6 15. Percent of New Growth for 1970-1995 According to Allocation Model by Sectors, Rockford, Illinois . l6l 16. Inventory of Landuse Data, Toledo, O h i o ........... 166 17. Estimated Years Required to Achieve Given State of Development, Toledo, Ohio ................ 170 18. Distribution Worksheet, Toledo, Ohio .............. 172 19. Percentage Distribution of Remaining Growth, Toledo, O h i o ..................................... 173 20. Distribution Worksheet of Residential Development, Toledo, O h i o .............................. 17U 21. Groupings of Census Tracts Arranged by Distance from High Value Comer (DSGM)................ 176 22. 1965 Population, Density and Holding Capacity by Census Tracts (DSGM) ....................... 177 23. 1965 Residential Density by Distance Bands ......... 180 2k. 1965 Population as a Percentage of Maximum Holding Capacity by Distance B a n d s .................. l8l vii 25. 1971* Forecast of Population “by Distance Band and Census T r a c t .............................. 182 26. 197^ Actual Population by Distance Bands and Census Tracts ................................ 183 27. Distribution of Population to Census Tracts (DSGM)............................................. 18H 2 8. Planning Area to Census Tract (i9 6 0) Equi'va­ lency Table (Toledo M e t h o d ) ................... 185 29. Distribution of 197^ Forecast Population to Census Tracts, Toledo Method ............ .... 186 viii LIST OF FIGURES Page 1. The Transportation Planning Process .............. U 2. The Landuse/Transportation C y c l e ................ 12 3. Chadwick's Model Categorization .................. 13 U. Echenique's Model Classification ................ lU 5. Predictive and Planning M o d e l s ......... 16 6. Structural Linkage, Akron, O h i o .................. h2 7. Structural Linkage, Austin, Texas ............... k2 8. Structural Linkage, Canton, O h i o .............. k3 9. Structural Linkage,
Recommended publications
  • Ohio Contract Usage 2017-2018
    Ohio Contract Usage 2017-2018 MHEC CONTRACTS leverage the potential volume of institutions. Additionally, because of MHEC’s statutory the region’s purchasing power while saving institutions status, many of these contracts can also be adopted time and money by simplifying the procurement process. for use by K-12 districts and schools, as well as cities, The2 contracts0162017 provide competitive solutions established states, and local governments. Smaller institutions in accordance with public procurement laws thereby benefit from these contracts as they allow these negating the institution’s need to conduct a competitive institutions to negotiate from the same pricing and terms sourcing event. By offering a turnkey solution with the normally reserved for larger institutions. MHEC relies on ability to tailor the already negotiated contract to match institutional experts to participate in the negotiations, ANNUAL the institution’s specific needs and requirements, MHEC sharing strategies and tactics on dealing with specific contractsREPORT shift some of the negotiating power back to the contractual issues and vendors. HARDWARE CONTRACTS Northwest State Community HARDWARE CONTRACTS Central Cleveland College Metropolitan School Higher to theEducation Member States K-12 Ohio Business College Central Local School District Antioch University Alexander Local School Ohio Northern University District Central Primary School Ashland University Ohio State University Aurora City School District Cincinnati Public Schools Capital University Ohio University
    [Show full text]
  • The Cortland Savings & Banking
    PUBLIC DISCLOSURE September 10, 2007 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION The Cortland Savings and Banking Company 846619 194 West Main Street Cortland, Ohio 44410 Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland P.O. Box 6387 Cleveland, OH 44101-1387 NOTE: This document is an evaluation of this institution's record of meeting the credit needs of its entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, consistent with safe and sound operation of the institution. This evaluation is not, nor should it be construed as, an assessment of the financial condition of this institution. The rating assigned to this institution does not represent an analysis, conclusion or opinion of the federal financial supervisory agency concerning the safety and soundness of this financial institution. The Cortland Saving and Banking Company, Cortland Ohio CRA Examination Cortland, Ohio September 10, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Institution’s CRA Rating ................................................................................................................ 1 Scope of examination ................................................................................................................... 1 Description of Institution................................................................................................................ 3 Conclusion with Respect to Performance Tests ........................................................................... 4 Description of the Assessment Areas ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments
    TOLEDO METROPOLITAN AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO Audit Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2019 Board of Trustees Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments 300 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, Suite 300 Toledo, Ohio 43604 We have reviewed the Independent Auditor’s Report of the Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments, Lucas County, prepared by Charles E. Harris & Associates, Inc., for the audit period July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. Based upon this review, we have accepted these reports in lieu of the audit required by Section 117.11, Revised Code. The Auditor of State did not audit the accompanying financial statements and, accordingly, we are unable to express, and do not express an opinion on them. Our review was made in reference to the applicable sections of legislative criteria, as reflected by the Ohio Constitution, and the Revised Code, policies, procedures and guidelines of the Auditor of State, regulations and grant requirements. The Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments is responsible for compliance with these laws and regulations. Keith Faber Auditor of State Columbus, Ohio February 14, 2020 Efficient Effective Transparent This page intentionally left blank. TOLEDO METROPOLITAN AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS LUCAS COUNTY AUDIT REPORT For the Year Ending June 30, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE Independent Auditors' Report……………………………………………………………………...………………………… 1-3 Management's Discussion and Analysis……………………………………………………..……………………………… 4-10 Basic Financial Statements: Statement of Net
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Department of Transportation • News Release ODOT Seeking Public Comment on Transportation Plan
    Ohio Department of Transportation • News Release DIVISION OF COMMUNICATIONS 1980 West Broad Street • Columbus, Ohio 43223 www.transportation.ohio.gov ODOT Seeking Public Comment on Transportation Plan The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) hereby notifies all interested persons that a draft long range transportation plan called Access Ohio 2040, an update to Ohio’s long-range transportation plan, is available for review and comment. Access Ohio 2040 is a vision for Ohio’s future transportation system that includes eleven recommendations which will guide, inform, and support ODOT’s policies and investment strategies in the coming years. You may provide your comments at www.accessohio2040.com or by visiting one of the locations identified below. Comments concerning Access Ohio 2040 may be submitted through the above website, by e- mail [email protected], or by mail: Jennifer Townley Division of Planning Attn: Charles Dyer Ohio Department of Transportation Mail Stop #3280 1980 West Broad Street Columbus, OH 43223 Written comments must be received by the close of business on January 15, 2014 ODOT Offices: ODOT District 1: 1885 North McCullough St. – Lima, Ohio 45801 ODOT District 2: 317 East Poe Rd. – Bowling Green, Ohio 43402 ODOT District 3: 906 Clark Avenue – Ashland, Ohio 44805 ODOT District 4: 2088 S. Arlington Road. – Akron, Ohio 44306 ODOT District 5: 9600 Jacksontown Road – Jacksontown, OH 43030 ODOT District 6: 400 E. William Street – Delaware, Ohio 43015 ODOT District 7: 1001 Saint Marys Avenue - Sidney, Ohio 45365 ODOT District 7, Poe Avenue Facility: 5994 Poe Avenue – Dayton, Ohio 45414 ODOT District 8: 505 S.
    [Show full text]
  • TAC, CIC and Policy Committee Meeting Packet
    Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study December 2013 Committee Meetings TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Thursday, December 12, 2013, 1:30 p.m. Stow Safety Building 3800 Darrow Road, Stow CITIZENS INVOLVEMENT COMMITTEE Thursday, December 12, 2013, 7:00 p.m. Meeting Room 1 Akron-Summit County Public Library - Main Library, 60 South High Street, Akron POLICY COMMITTEE Thursday, December 19, 2013, 1:30 p.m. PLEASE NOTE NEW MEETING LOCATION: Quaker Station, Quaker Square Inn, The University of Akron Hotel 135 South Broadway, Akron AMATS POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING UNIVERSITY OF AKRON QUAKER SQUARE M ILL ST E V ^_ A FR Y EE PA A RK ING W D A ^_ O R B ^_ ^_ PARKING ENTRANCE ´ ^_ BUILDING ENTRANCE Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study Policy Committee Quaker Station, Quaker Square Inn The University of Akron Hotel 135 South Broadway, Akron, Ohio Thursday, December 19, 2013 1:30 p.m. Agenda 1. Call to Order A. Determination of a Quorum Oral B. Audience Participation* 2. Minutes - Motion Required A. September 25, 2013 Meeting Attachment 2A 3. Staff Reports A. Financial Progress Report - Motion Required Attachment 3A B. Technical Progress Report Oral C. AMATS Federal Funds Report Attachment 3C 4. Old Business 5. New Business A. AMATS: The State of Our Region’s Transportation Infrastructure Attachment 5A B. Bicycle Related Crashes 2010-2012 Attachment 5B 6. Resolutions A. Resolution 2013-17 – Conformity Determination and Concurrence Attachment 6A with the Revised Air Quality Conformity Analyses for the Cleveland- Akron Air Quality Area Necessitated by the Amendment to Transportation Outlook 2035 and FY 2014-2017 TIP.
    [Show full text]
  • 62.4 Report: Profile on Urban Health and Competitiveness in Akron, Ohio
    62.4 Report: Profile on Urban Health and Competitiveness in Akron, Ohio Greater Ohio Policy Center January 2016 Acknowledgements This Study was made possible by support from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. This Study was primarily researched and written by Torey Hollingsworth, Researcher, and Alison Goebel, Deputy Director at Greater Ohio Policy Center. Cover photo by Shane Wynn, courtesy of akronstock.com. 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Comparison Cities ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Quantitative Analysis and Interviews ....................................................................................................... 7 Findings ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 1. Shifting Economies
    [Show full text]
  • Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments Lucas County Single
    TOLEDO METROPOLITAN AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS LUCAS COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE Independent Auditor’s Report ....................................................................................................................... 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis ....................................................................................................... 5 Basic Financial Statements: Statement of Net Position – Major Enterprise Fund ............................................................................ 11 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position – Major Enterprise Fund .............. 12 Statement of Cash Flows – Major Enterprise Fund ............................................................................. 13 Statement of Net Position – Fiduciary Fund ........................................................................................ 14 Notes to the Basic Financial Statements ................................................................................................... 15 Schedule of Fringe Benefit Cost Rate ........................................................................................................ 27 Schedule of Indirect Cost Rate .................................................................................................................. 28 Schedule of Revenue and Expenses for US Department of Transportation Funds .................................. 29 Schedule of Federal Awards Expenditures ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Vibrant NEO 2040 Northeast Ohio Sustainable Communities Consortium Executive Summary
    Sustainable Communities NEOConsortium Vibrant NEO Guidebook For a More Vibrant, Resilient, and Sustainable Northeast Ohio An Executive Summary of the Vibrant NEO 2040 Vision, Framework & Action Products For Our Future VibrantNEO.org Photo supplied by the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Photo supplied by the Pro Football In 2010, leaders from and representing Northeast Ohio’s 12-county region recognized that our futures are bound together and concluded that our region could be more successful if we worked to anticipate, prepare for, and build that future together, instead of apart. The Northeast Ohio Sustainable Communities Consortium (NEOSCC), was created to figure out how to achieve this goal. NEOSCC’s mission is to create conditions for a more vibrant, resilient, and sustainable Northeast Ohio – a Northeast Ohio that is full of energy and enthusiasm, a good steward of its built and natural resources, and adaptable and responsive to change. NEOSCC Vital Statistics Launched: January 2011 Board Member Organizations: Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study (AMATS) | Akron Metropolitan Housing Authority | Akron Urban League | Ashtabula County | Catholic Charities, Diocese of Youngstown | The Center for Community Solutions | City of Akron | City of Cleveland | City of Elyria | City of Youngstown | Cleveland Metroparks | Cleveland Museum of Natural History | Cleveland State University | Cuyahoga County | Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority | Eastgate Regional Council of Governments | Fund for Our Economic Future | Greater Cleveland RTA
    [Show full text]
  • December 2007
    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Air Pollution Control Ohio’s PM 2.5 Recommended Designations Prepared by: The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Air Pollution Control December 2007 [This page intentionally left blank] Page 2 of 177 Acknowledgement The Ohio EPA, Division of Air Pollution Control would like to express appreciation for the extensive efforts, guidance and expertise provided by the Ohio Department of Development, Office of Strategic Research staff, especially Ed Simmons. The level of detailed county-specific information provided in this document would not have been possible without Mr. Simmons efforts and timely assistance. Appreciation is also extended to Greg Stella at Alpinegeophysics, Inc. and to Mark Janssen at Midwest RPO for their assistance with the emissions data included in this submittal. Page 3 of 177 [This page intentionally left blank] Page 4 of 177 List of Appendices A. Air Quality System (AQS) data sheets B. Ohio EPA, DAPC PM2.5 summary sheets C. SLAMS 2006 PM2.5 certification D. Speciation data E. Meteorology data, wind roses F. Physiographic, elevation and land cover maps G. Jurisdiction boundary maps H. County profiles and statewide informational maps I. Public notice, public hearing, and response to comments documentation Page 5 of 177 Current PM2.5 Ohio EPA Nonattainment Recommended Designation Area Designation Nonattainment Counties Counties (1) Canton-Massillon, OH Stark Stark Butler Butler Clermont Clermont (2) Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Hamilton Hamilton Warren
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Stabilization OVER-THE-RHINE LANG BUILDING, MT
    Vol 3. Issue 6 - Port Progress Sign Up for our Newsletter [email protected] A project update of the Port of Greater Cincinnati Development Authority Historic Stabilization OVER-THE-RHINE LANG BUILDING, MT. HEALTHY THEATER LIVE TO SEE ANOTHER CENTURY The Hamilton County Landbank's Historic Structure Stabilization program assists in the stabilization of important, historic, vacant buildings across Hamilton County, in order to preserve them for future re-use. The Landbank has completed four stabilizations this year so far, including two properties in Lower Price Hill, as well as 1706 Lang St. building in Over-the-Rhine, and the Mt. Healthy Theater on Hamilton Avenue. 1706 Lang: Built in 1855, the three-story brick structure was crumbling into the street and slated for demolition in early spring 2015, until an outpouring of community support successfully halted its demise. The City of Cincinnati partnered with the Hamilton County Landbank to stabilize the property at a total cost of $134,600. The Landbank managed the stabilization project, which was completed in June. Vol 3. Issue 6 - Port Progress Sign Up for our Newsletter [email protected] The Mt. Healthy Theater: Known as the Main Theater dating back to 1915, operated by the Blum family, the neighborhood cinema thrived through the 40s and 50s as a prime entertainment spot with a focus on family-friendly films. The theater closed in 1971 and aside from a stint as an auction house, suffered years of neglect with the building falling into disrepair. The Port Authority determined the building to be of sufficient historical significance and worked with the City of Mount Healthy to stabilize it from further deterioration until a new use can be found for it.
    [Show full text]
  • Village of Mantua, Ohio RESOLUTION 2020-17 a RESOLUTION OPPOSING ELIMINATION of the U.S
    Village of Mantua, Ohio RESOLUTION 2020-17 A RESOLUTION OPPOSING ELIMINATION OF THE U.S. CENSUS AKRON METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR, ON BEHALF OF THE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF MANTUA, TO PREPARE AND SUBMIT LETTERS OF OPPOSITION TO THIS INITIATIVE. WHEREAS, the Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study (AMATS) is designated as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) by the Governor, acting through the Ohio Department of Transportation and in cooperation with locally elected officials for Summit and Portage Counties and the Chippewa and Milton Township areas of Wayne County; and WHEREAS, Summit and Portage Counties are both contained in the AMATS service area and make up the U.S. Census Bureau’s Akron Metropolitan Statistical Area; and WHEREAS, The Akron metropolitan area has been represented continuously in the U.S Census since 1930 when the U.S. Census Bureau incorporated Metropolitan Districts; and WHEREAS, Summit County has been part of the Akron Metropolitan Statistical Area since the creation of Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas in 1950; and WHEREAS, Portage County has been part of the Akron Metropolitan Statistical Area since 1970; and WHEREAS, the Akron metropolitan area (Summit and Portage Counties) geography was represented in the 1980 U.S. Census as a Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area and part of the Cleveland-Akron-Lorain, Ohio Standard Combined Statistical Area; and WHEREAS, the Akron metropolitan area geography was represented in the 1990 U.S. Census as a Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area and part of the Cleveland-Akron-Lorain, Ohio Combined Metropolitan Statistical Area; and WHEREAS, the Akron metropolitan area geography was represented in the 2000 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Attendance Detail Report, April 16, 2021
    Sunshine Laws Certified Training Training Requested by Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments Cisco WebEx Event ID:180709452765237 / Event Key: 1792599234 April 16, 2021 8:45 a m. - 12:30 p m. Designee on behalf of:(Enter Attorney NAMES only, NOT Board Attendance Attendance First Name Last Name Bar # Title Company Members, City Council, etc.) Join Time Leave Time Duration Minutes Duration Hours Hiwot Abraha 8:43 am New 12:19 pm New 216 3.60 York Time York Time Joseph Adamovich Township Trustee Knox Township, Jefferson 8:41 am New 12:20 pm New 218 3.63 County York Time York Time Cecelia Adams City Council Member Toledo City Council 9:34 am New 12:20 pm New 165 2.75 York Time York Time Rebecca Advent 0095171 Assistant Director of Law City of Akron 8:55 am New 12:19 pm New 204 3.40 York Time York Time Rebecca Advent 0095171 Assistant Director of Law City of Akron 8:46 am New 8:49 am New 2 0.03 York Time York Time Jennifer Allen Executive Assistant TMACOG 8:40 am New 11:09 am New 149 2.48 York Time York Time Kurt Althouse Police Chief Vandalia Division of Police 8:43 am New 12:19 pm New 215 3.58 York Time York Time Jodey Altier trustee Perry & Associates 9:05 am New 9:06 am New 1 0.02 York Time York Time Jill Amos Fiscal Officer Butler Township Paul Lease 8:48 am New 12:19 pm New 210 3.50 Matt Hall York Time York Time Tom Sanor George Anagnostou Treasurer/CFO Strongsville City Schools Richard Micko 8:49 am New 12:19 pm New 210 3.50 Laura Wolfe-Housum York Time York Time Michelle Bissell Sherry Buckner-Sallee Seth Roberts thomas Anderson
    [Show full text]