Simpo PDF Merge and Split Unregistered Version
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
, CHAPTER 31 OROFACIAL IMPLANTS 691 Simpo PDF Merge and Split Unregistered Version - http://www.simpopdf.com A B FIG. 31-17 A, Panoramic image demonstrating an apparently successfulimplant place- ment. B, Conventional cross-sectional tomogram reveals that the implant perforated the facial cortex in an attempt to avoid the nasopalatine canal. The angle of this implant also created a restorative dilemma. BIBLIOGRAPHY McGivney GP et al: A comparison of computer-assistedtomog- raphy and data-gathering modalities in prosthodontics, Int 1 Oral Maxillofac Implants 1:55, 1986. COMPARATIVE DOSIMETRY Schwarz MS et al: Computed tomography. I. Preoperative Avendanio B et al: Estimate of radiation detriment: scanog- assessment of the mandible for endosseous implant raphy and intraoral radiology, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral surgery, Intl Oral Maxillofac Implants 2:137,1987. Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 82:713, 1996. Schwarz MS et al: Computed tomography. II. Preoperative Frederiksen NL et al: Effective dose and risk assessment assessmentof the maxilla for endosseousimplant surgery, from computed tomography of the maxillofacial complex, Intl Oral Maxillofac Implants 2:143,1987. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 24:55, 1995. Wishan MS et al: Computed tomography as an adjunct in Frederiksen NL et al: Risk assessment from film tomography dental implant surgery, Intl Oral Maxillofac Implants 8:31, used for dental implant diagnostics, Dentomaxillofac 1988. Radiol 23:123, 1994. Lecomber AR, Yoneyama Y, Lovelock DJ, Hosoi T, Adams AM: CONVENTIONAL TOMOGRAPHY Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for Ekestubbe A et al: The use of tomography for dental implant dental implant planning suing conventional radiography planning, Dentomaxillofac Radiol 26:206, 1997. and computed tomography, Dentomaxillofac Radiol Grondahl K et al: Reliability of hypocycloidal tomography for 30:255, 2001. the evaluation of the distance from the alveolar crest to the scar G et al: Dosimetry and cost of imaging for osseointe- mandibular canal, Dentomaxillofac Radiol 20:200, 1991. grated implants with film-based and computed tomogra- KassebaumDK et al: Cross-sectionalradiography for implant phy, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod site assessment,Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 70:674, 83:41,1997. 1990. Stella JP, Tharanon W: A precise radiographic method to COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY determine the location of the inferior alveolar canal in the Kraut RA: Utilization of 3D/DENTAL software for precise posterior edentulous mandible: implications for dental implant site selection: clinical reports, Implant Dent 1:134, implants. I. Technique, IntJ Oral Maxillofac Implants 5:15, 1992. 1990. 692 PART V RADIOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION OF PATHOLOGY Simpo PDF Merge and Split Unregistered Version - http://www.simpopdf.com Stella ]P, Tharanon W: A precise radiographic method to GENERALIMPLANTOLOGY determine the location of the inferior alveolar canal in the Block MA et aI, editors: Implants in dentistry, Philadelphia, posterior edentulous mandible: implications for dental 1997, WB Saunders. implants. II. Clinical application, Int] Oral Maxillofac Branemark P-I et ai, editors: Tissue integrated prostheses, Implants 5:23, 1990. Chicago, 1985, Quintessence. Cranin AM et al: A statistical evaluation of 952 endosteal GENERAL IMAGING TECHNIQUES implants in humans,] Am Dent Assoc 94:315, 1977. Benson BW: Presurgical radiographic planning for dental Sahiwal I, Woody RD, Benson BW, Guillen GE: Macro design implants, Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 13:751, morphology of endosseousdental implants,] Prosthet Dent 2001. 87:543, 2002. Benson BW: Diagnostic imaging for dental implant assess- ment, 1;"exasDent] 112:37,1995. IMAGING TECHNIQUES (IMAGING STENTS) DeSmet E, Jacobs R, Gijbels F, Naert I: The accuracy and Cehreli MC, AsIan Y; Sahin S: Bilaminar dual-purpose stent reliability of radiographic methods for the assessmentof for placement of dental implants, J Prosthet Dent 84:55, marginal bone level around oral implants, Dentomaxillofac 2000. RadioI31:176,2002. Israelson H et al: Barium-coated surgical stentsand computer- Frederiksen NL: Diagnostic imaging in dental implantology, assisted tomography in the preoperative assessmentof Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80:540, dental implant patients, Int J Periodont Restorative Dent 1995. 12:53, 1992. Hollender L, RockIer B: Radiographic evaluation of osseoin- Ku YC, Shen YF: Fabrication of a radiographic and surgical tegrated implants of the jaws, Dentomaxillofac RadioI9:91, stent for implants with a vacuum former, J Prosthet Dent 1980. 83:252, 2000. Klinge B et ai: Location of the mandibular canal: comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SOFTWARE computed tomography, Int] Oral Maxillofac Implants Cucchiara R, Franchini F, Lamma A, Lamma E, Sansoni T, 4:327,1989. Sarti E: Enhancing implant surgery planning via comput- Milgrom P, GetzT: Implants: growing concern, Dental Claims erized image processing, Int] of Comput Dent 4:9, 2001. and Insurance News 8:1, 1994 [newsletter]. Rosenfeld AL, Mecall RA: The use of interactive computed Pharoah M]: Imaging techniques and their clinical signifi- tomography to predict the esthetic and functional demands cance, Int] Prosthodont 6:176, 1993. of implant-supported prostheses, Compend Contin Educ ReiskenAB: Implant imaging: status, controversies, and new Dent 17:1125,1996. developments, Dent Clin North Am 2:47, 1998. Sahiwal IG, Woody RD, Benson BW, Guillen GE: Radi- PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY ographic identification of threaded endosseous dental Lindh C, Petersson AR: Radiologic examination of the implants,] Prosthet Dent 87:563, 2002. mandibular canal: a comparison between panoramic Sahiwal IG, Woody RD, Benson BW, Guillen GE: Radi- radiography and conventional tomography, Int J Oral ographic identification of nonthreaded endosseousdental Maxillofac Implants 4:249, 1989. implants,] Prosthet Dent 87:552,2002. Tal H, Moses0: A comparison of panoramic radiography with Tyndall DA, Brooks SL: Selection criteria for dental implant computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery, site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Dentomaxillofac Radiol 20:40, 1991. Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Truhlar RS et al: A review of panoramic radiography and its Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:630, 2000. potential use in implant dentistry, Implant Dent 2: 122, 1993. Simpo PDF Merge and Split Unregistered Version - http://www.simpopdf.com A Adenocarcinoma, minor salivary glands Aiming cylinder A-V aneurysm, 449 and, 675 central ray and, 164 A-V defect, 449 Adenoid cystic carcinoma horizontal bitewing films and, 148, 149 A-V malformation, 449 nerve sheath metastasisand, 675 Air, subject density and, 78 A-V shunt, 449 ultrasonography of, 675f Air kerma, exposure and, 21 ABC. SeeAneurysmal bone cysts (ABC) Adenoma, primary hyperparathyroidism Airway, lateral cephalometric projection Abrasion and,517 and, 2l9f, 220 overview of, 355 Adenomatoid odontogenic tumors Ala-tragus line, lateral mandibular occlusal secondary dentin and, 360 calcification in, 433f projection and, 159 Abscessformation, periodontitis and, 314 calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumors ALARA, radiation and, 52, 61 Abscesses.See also Acute dentoalveolar vo,423 Alcohol, maternal, prenatal irradiation vs., abscess calcifying odontogenic cyst Vo,400 39, 40t CT and, 664 cementoossifying fibroma vo,501 Alcoholism Absorbed dose, rad and, 21 clinical features of, 431 parotid area V., 658 Acentric fragment, chromosome differential diagnosis and, 433 sialadenosisand, 670 aberrations and, 28f overviewof,431 Alkali compounds, developers and, 97 Acetone, diabetes mellitus and, 523 radiographic features of, 431-432 Alkaline pH values, developers and, 97 Acid, erosion and, 356 synonyms for, 431 Alkaline phosphatase,hypophosphatasia Acidifiers, fixing solution and, 98 treatment of, 433 and, 526 Acidophilic cells, hyperpituitarism and, Adhesions, overview of, 557 Allergen, sinusitis and, 578 521 Administrative radiographs, overview of, 272 Allergic reaction, arthrography v., 548, Acinic cell carcinoma, minor salivary Adolescents 549f glands and, 675 . carious lesions in, 301 Allergic rhinitis, chronic sinusitis and, 579 Acquired concrescence,337 central giant cell granuloma and; 502 Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, Acquired cysts,671 TMJ dysfunction and, 538 leukemia and, 482 Acromegalic prognathism, inherited Adrenal adenoma, Cushing's syndrome Alpha goblin genes, thalassemiaand, 533 prognathism v., 521 and,523 Alpha particles, 5 Acromegaly,520 Adrenal carcinoma, Cushing's syndrome Aluminum filtration, patient exposure excessivegrowth of mandible in, 522f and, 523 and, 60 hypercementosis and, 362 Adrenal glands, Cushing's syndrome and, Aluminum step wedge, 78f hyperpituitarism v., 521 523 x-ray beam and, 79, 80f paranasal sinus and, 576 Adrenal hyperplasia, Cushing's syndrome Alveolar bone Activator, overview of, 97 and, 523 eosinophilic granuloma and, 509 Acute apical periodontitis, 367 Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) , hemifacial hyperplasia and, 650 Acute dentoalveolar abscess,nasopalatine basophilic adenoma and, 523 lateral cephalometric projection and, duct cystsv., 403 Adults, cortical borders in, 539 2l9f, 220 Acute inflammatory processes,CT and, African jaw lymphoma, children and, 478 loss of height in, 282-283 663 Agenesis, basal cell nevus syndrome and, malignancy and, 459 Acute leukemias, 481 397 periodontal diseasesand, 267, 315, Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 481