DOCSLIB.ORG

Infrastructure Delivery Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Infrastructure Delivery Plan Our Local Plan Strategic Flood T Risk Assessment 1 r ._,and � Update September 2015 Revision Schedule Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by September Draft SFRA update Matthew Marie Surtees Sarah 2015 Chapman Thompson December SFRA update Matthew Marie Surtees Planning Policy 2015 Chapman Committee Planning Policy Tandridge District Council The Council Offices 8 Station Road East Oxted, Surrey RH8 0BT 1 Executive Summary This Tandridge District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) 2015 Update report updates the Tandridge District Strategic Flood Risk Assessment 2007. This report has been prepared to update the work that was included in the previous SFRA and provide appropriate supporting evidence for Tandridge District Local Plan. Since the previous SFRA there have been a number of changes to the planning system, including the Localism Act (2011) and the 2012 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) with accompanying Planning Practice Guidance (March 2014). In addition, the provisions of the Flood and Water Management Act (2010) have been substantially commenced under a programme that was initiated by Defra in April 2010 and the Flood Risk Regulations came into force in December 2009 (these regulations transposed the EU Floods Directive into UK law). SFRA objectives There are two levels of SFRAs . Level One: where flooding is not a major issue and where development pressures are low. The Assessment should be sufficiently detailed to allow application of the Sequential Test. Level Two: where land outside flood risk areas cannot appropriately accommodate all the necessary development and the NPPF’s Exception Test needs to be applied. The Assessment should consider the detailed nature of the flood characteristics within a flood zone. An SFRA was completed in 2007 that formed part of the evidence base for the examination into the Tandridge District Core Strategy. The report comprised of a level one desk-based study that used existing information to carry out an assessment that was proportionate to the risk and appropriate to the scale, nature and location of development. The objectives of this SFRA is to update and review the 2007 SFRA which covers the whole of the District and if required a more detailed assessment of potential employment and housing allocations emerging through the Local Plan process. SFRA outputs This report is a level one Strategic Flood Risk Assessment and as set out in the Planning Practice Guidance it “should be sufficiently detailed to allow application of the Sequential Test to the location of development and to identify whether development can be allocated outside high and medium flood risk areas, based on all sources of flooding, without application of the Exception Test” (Paragraph: 012 Reference ID: 7-012-20140306). Summary The findings of this updated SFRA have fed into the Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment and assisted in the development of the strategic policies options within the Regulation 18 consultation paper. If site allocations are necessary at the regulation 19 stage to deliver the amount of housing that is required within the Local Plan, the SFRA, along with the Caterham Bourne Flood Alleviation Project, the Burstow Flood Alleviation Project, and the modelling of the River Eden will provide the necessary information required to undertake the site specific assessments. This will ensure that any allocation of sites will take account of the long term solutions to flooding within the district, particularly if the acquisition of land is required to deliver a flood alleviation scheme. The SFRA presents Flood Zone Maps that outline the Environment Agency flood zones as Flood Zone 1, low probability, Flood Zone 2, medium probability and Flood Zone 3a, high probability. In addition, the map from the Environment Agency showing the risk of flooding from surface water and ground water have played a key role within this SFRA. The application of the Sequential Test (and where appropriate, the Exception Test) in order to steer vulnerable development away from 2 areas of flood risk, remains a fundamental part of the planning process and these maps have been used in the assessment and will be used in the future for the assessment of the site allocations. Recommendations This Level 1 SFRA report has been developed by building heavily upon existing knowledge with respect to flood risk within the district. The report has not been prepared to consider site-specific allocations, instead, it has informed the development of the Strategic Options (Regulation 18) consultation. As mentioned above there are three key pieces of modelling that are being carried out: . Caterham Bourne Flood Alleviation Project; . Burstow Flood Alleviation Project; and . Environment Agency modelling of the flood zones 2 and 3 in the River Eden catchment. Once these projects are completed the SFRA will be updated so that the information contained within them will assist in the flood risk assessment for the site allocations. In summary, the SFRA is a ‘living’ document and will be reviewed regularly in light of emerging policy directives and an improving understanding of flood risk within the district. Proceeding with the SFRA in the production of the Local Plan: . The Council will apply the Sequential Test to the potential development sites and identify those sites they consider will be necessary to apply the Exception Test; . The layout of buildings and access routes should adopt a sequential approach, steering buildings (and hence people) towards areas of lowest risk within the boundaries of the site. This will also ensure that the risk of flooding is not worsened by, for example, blocked flood flow routes. Consultation with Surrey County Council as the Local Lead Flood Authority and the Environment Agency following completion of the Exception Test will be carried out to ensure that they accept the justification for progressing with sites that require the Exception Test; and . The SFRA outputs will be used by the district to assess flood risk to windfall sites which become available for redevelopment. If such sites require the Exception Test a site-specific flood risk assessment will be needed to be considered sound. 3 Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 The Planning Framework, Flood Risk Policy and catchment studies ................................... 12 Roles and responsibilities in the management of flood risk ................................................. 16 Overview of Geology and Topography in Tandridge District ................................................ 21 Flood defences ................................................................................................................... 23 Flooding from artificial sources ............................................................................................ 25 Overview of types of flooding .............................................................................................. 27 Historic flood events and sources of flooding by area.......................................................... 31 Overview of all development options ................................................................................... 45 Flood risk management in the Local Plan ............................................................................ 48 Conclusions and recommendations .................................................................................... 51 Appendix 1 Advice Note on contents of a Sustainable Drainage Statement ........................ 52 Appendix 2: Flood event records from the three catchments ............................................... 62 Appendix 3 Topographic map ............................................................................................. 63 Appendix 4 Map showing areas at risk from river flooding ................................................... 64 Appendix 5 Map showing areas at risk from surface water flooding .................................... 65 Appendix 6 Map showing areas at risk of groundwater flooding .......................................... 66 4 Introduction Purpose of the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment This Tandridge District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) 2015 Update report updates the Tandridge District Strategic Flood Risk Assessment 2007. This report has been prepared to update the work that was included in the previous SFRA and provide appropriate supporting evidence for Tandridge District Local Plan. Since the previous SFRA there have been a number of changes to the planning system, including the Localism Act (2011) and the 2012 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) with accompanying Planning Practice Guidance (March 2014). In addition, the provisions of the Flood and Water Management Act (2010) have been substantially commenced under a programme that was initiated by Defra in April 2010 and the Flood Risk Regulations came into force in December 2009 (these regulations transposed the EU Floods Directive into UK law). The planning practice guidance provides a summary diagram of how flood risk should be taken into account in the preparation of Local plans, this is set out below. 5 Figure 1 Taking flood risk into account in the preparation of a Local Plan Local planning authority undertakes a level 1 strategic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unit Unit Code Grid Ref 10K Wetland Bird Survey
    Wetland Bird Survey - Surrey & SW London All sites as at 6 March 2020 Unit Unit Code Grid Ref 10K Critchmere Ponds 23043 SU881332 SU83 Shottermill Ponds (W Sussex) 23015 SU881334 SU83 Badshot Lea 17064 SU862490 SU84 Frensham Great Pond 23010 SU845401 SU84 Frensham Little Pond 23009 SU859414 SU84 Frensham Ponds 23011 SU845405 SU84 Swamp in Moor Park 23321 SU865465 SU84 The Moat - Elstead 23014 SU899414 SU84 Tices Meadow 23227 SU872484 SU84 Tongham Gravel Pit 23225 SU882490 SU84 Waverley Abbey Lake 23013 SU869454 SU84 Frimley Gravel Pits (FGP) 23221 SU877573 SU85 Frimley J N Lakes (count as FGP) 23722 SU879569 SU85 Frimley J South Lake (count as FGP) 23721 SU881565 SU85 Greatbottom Flash 23016 SU895532 SU85 Mytchett Gravel Pit (aka North Camp GPs) 23222 SU885546 SU85 Quay Lake (count as FGP) 23723 SU883560 SU85 Tomlin`s Pond 23006 SU887586 SU85 Rapley Lakes 23005 SU898646 SU86 RMA Lakes 23008 SU862606 SU86 Broadford Pond 23042 SU996470 SU94 Broadwater Lake (Farncombe) 23040 SU983452 SU94 Busbridge Lakes 23039 SU973420 SU94 Cuttmill Ponds 23037 SU909462 SU94 Enton Ponds 23038 SU949403 SU94 R Wey - Lammas Lands 23325 SU971442 SU94 River Wey - Bridge Road to Borough Road 23331 SU970441 SU94 Shalford Water Meadows 23327 SU996476 SU94 Thursley Ponds 23036 SU917407 SU94 Tuesley Farm 23108 SU963412 SU94 Winkworth Arboretum 23041 SU995413 SU94 Brookwood Country Park 23017 SU963575 SU95 Goldsworth Park Lake, Woking 23029 SU982589 SU95 Henley Park Lake (nr Pirbright) 23018 SU934536 SU95 Whitmoor Common (Brittons Pond) 23020 SU990531 SU95 Whitmoor
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the Basis for Realising Surrey's Local
    Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: The basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network Surrey Nature Partnership September 2019 (revised) Investing in our County’s future Contents: 1. Background 1.1 Why Biodiversity Opportunity Areas? 1.2 What exactly is a Biodiversity Opportunity Area? 1.3 Biodiversity Opportunity Areas in the planning system 2. The BOA Policy Statements 3. Delivering Biodiversity 2020 - where & how will it happen? 3.1 Some case-studies 3.1.1 Floodplain grazing-marsh in the River Wey catchment 3.1.2 Calcareous grassland restoration at Priest Hill, Epsom 3.1.3 Surrey’s heathlands 3.1.4 Priority habitat creation in the Holmesdale Valley 3.1.5 Wetland creation at Molesey Reservoirs 3.2 Summary of possible delivery mechanisms 4. References Figure 1: Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Areas Appendix 1: Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statement format Appendix 2: Potential Priority habitat restoration and creation projects across Surrey (working list) Appendices 3-9: Policy Statements (separate documents) 3. Thames Valley Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (TV01-05) 4. Thames Basin Heaths Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (TBH01-07) 5. Thames Basin Lowlands Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (TBL01-04) 6. North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (ND01-08) 7. Wealden Greensands Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (WG01-13) 8. Low Weald Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (LW01-07) 9. River Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (R01-06) Appendix 10: BOA Objectives & Targets Summary (separate document) Written by: Mike Waite Chair, Biodiversity Working Group Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: The basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network, Sept 2019 (revised) 2 1. Background 1.1 Why Biodiversity Opportunity Areas? The concept of Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs) has been in development in Surrey since 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Version 3 | July 2018 Contents
    Volunteer handbook Version 3 | July 2018 Contents 3. Welcome to Surrey Wildlife Trust 4. About Surrey Wildlife Trust 5. What is volunteering 6. Volunteer roles & responsibilities 7. Important information 9. The social aspect 10. Map of managed sites 11. Site list Contact details The Volunteer Development Team, Surrey Wildlife Trust, School Lane Pirbright, Surrey GU24 0JN © Surrey Wildlife Trust 2018 Registered Charity No 208123 Welcome to Surrey Wildlife Trust! Now you have signed up to volunteering, you will be part of a network of volunteers who help the Trust to make a real difference for nature You could be... SAVING THREATENED HABITATS… SURVEYING PROTECTED SPECIES INSPIRING A THE NEXT GENERAtion… RAISING AWARENESS IN YOUR LOCAL COMMUNITY Volunteers are an important and valued part of Surrey Wildlife Trust (SWT) and this is your chance to make a real contribution to local conservation. We hope that you enjoy volunteering with us and feel part of our team. Founded by volunteers in 1959 the same ideals still remain at the core of the organisation today, with volunteers working alongside our staff in just about every aspect of the Trust. The partnership between the Trust and its volunteers has enabled us to advance nature conservation and awareness in the county and we are committed to continuing this vital work. This handbook has been produced by the Volunteer Development team and includes the main information you’ll need to know about volunteering with Surrey Wildlife Trust. Welcome and thank you for your support! Surrey Wildlife Trust Volunteer Handbook | 3 About Surrey Wildlife Trust Surrey Wildlife Trust is committed to helping wildlife to survive and thrive across the county Surrey Wildlife Trust is one of 46 Wildlife Trusts working across the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • OXF8027 RPS HRA Screening Report Draft NPS Revision
    APPENDIX 5 GATWICK RUNWAY 2 MOLE GAP TO REIGATE ESCARPMENT SAC & ASHDOWN FOREST SPA/SAC REVISED HABITAT REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT REPORT: STAGE 1 (SCREENING) December 2017 Our Ref: OXF8027 RPS 20 Western Avenue Milton Park Abingdon OX14 4SH rpsgroup.com QUALITY MANAGEMENT Prepared by: Elizabeth White, Nick Betson, Fiona Prismall Reviewed by: Mike Barker, Julia Tindale Authorised by: David Cowan Date: December 2017 (Updated for Revised Draft NPS Consultation) Project Number/Document 8027 – HRA Screening Report Reference: COPYRIGHT © RPS The material presented in this report is confidential. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Gatwick Airport Limited and shall not be distributed or made available to any other company or person without the knowledge and written consent of RPS. Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening December 2017 rpsgroup .com /uk CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... I 1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF ASSESSMENT .......................................................................... 1 Background and Purpose of this Report .................................................................................................. 1 HRA Process ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Guidance and Information Used in Preparing this Report ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Harvest Mouse Project Report
    Surrey Harvest Mouse Project Report for People’s Trust for Endangered Species David Williams CMIEEM January 2015 Surrey Wildlife Trust, School Lane, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey GU24 0JN 1 The Harvest Mouse (Micromys minutus) project began in 2011 as a result of a successful application for funding to People’s Trust for Endangered Species. Surrey Wildlife Trust also part funded the project. Although populations are reported to have declined by 71% (Sargent et al 1997) very little successful survey work has been undertaken in Surrey. Lack of survey information about Harvest mice numbers is probably due to the ineffectiveness of survey and trapping techniques (Riordan et al 2009; Poulton and Turner 2009 and Meek 2011). Nest searches can be overestimated with Harvest mice building several nests for each brood (R.C.Trout and S.Harris, Mammals of Great Britain 2008). The project used several types of surveys and different trapping methods. The aims were to enhance our knowledge and status of the species (which would inform management plans to ensure sensitively managed habitats) and raise public awareness of the conservation status of the Harvest mouse, using them as a flagship species to promote landscape scale conservation of floodplain grazing. These aims would be achieved by trapping, nest surveys, owl pellet dissection, positioning hair tubes and camera traps. We trialled three types of small mammal live traps at two different heights (one being at floor level). Nest searches were undertaken and owl pellets were collected and dissected to search for Harvest mice remains. Hair tubes were trialled at various heights, along with trail cameras placed in the stork zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Conservation Days June-August 2019
    Practical Conservation Days June-August 2019 Joining Instructions: Contact details •To book your place, please text the event leader at least the day To be added to the weekly practical conservation update before with your name. email (county-wide) or to register as a volunteer, contact the SWT Volunteering Team: •Arrive promptly – it is often difficult to find the work area. Online: surreywildlifetrust.org/volunteering •Wear suitable outdoor clothing (old trousers, long sleeve top) and stout footwear or wellies. Email: [email protected] •Children under 16 must be accompanied by a responsible Call: 01483 795464 adult. Those aged16 – 18 must have formal consent (form at Information correct at time of publication. Conservation surreywildlifetrust.org/volunteering) days might change due to unforeseen circumstances. For amendments and additional entries, visit •Take plenty to drink and a packed lunch. surreywildlifetrust.org/whatson. •Insurance cover is provided by Surrey Wildlife Trust. •No dogs allowed unless permission is given by the leader. Conservation day information: Listed postcodes are an approximate location only. Many reserves are isolated and some have limited or no parking. Weekday conservation days run from 10am - 3pm approx. For most days, volunteers must make their own way to site. On Wednesdays, volunteers in the East of Surrey, meet at the Bothy (Norbury Park - RH5 6DN, TQ 170 540) at 9.15am for a lift by minibus (entries shaded if transport available), or volunteers can make their own way to site for 10am. Weekend conservation days run from 10am - 3pm (or 4pm if stated). Volunteers need to make their own way to site.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteer - Handbook
    Volunteer - handbook - Version 2 | May 2017 Contents Volunteer Handbook 3. Welcome to Surrey Wildlife Trust 4. About Surrey Wildlife Trust 5. What is volunteering 5. What do volunteers do? 5. Who can volunteer? 5. Why volunteer with us? 5. Do volunteers have to be members? 5. Do you need prior experience? 6. Volunteer roles & responsibilities 6. Our responsibilities to you 7. Important information 7.Registration and induction 7. Being a Trust representative 7. Expenses and timesheets 7. Supervision and support 8. Training and development 8. Voluntary Conservation Trainees 8. Policies and procedures 10. The social aspect 11. Managed sites 12. Site list Contact details The Volunteer Development Team, Surrey Wildlife Trust, School Lane Pirbright, Surrey GU24 0JN © Surrey Wildlife Trust 2016 Registered Charity No 208123, Surrey Wildlife Trust Ltd. is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no. 645176, VAT No 791.3799.78 Scrub control, Water Vole, Grass Snake, Jon Hawkins; Dormouse, Tom Marshall; Muddy hands, Julie Norman; Heather, Tom Marshall; Grassland survey, woodland survey, family pond dipping, Matthew Roberts; Bee Orchid, P. Precey; River survey, Karen Lloyd; Box checking, Lizzie Wilberforce; Otter, Elliott Neep Welcome to Surrey Wildlife Trust! Now you have signed up to volunteering, you will be part of a network of over 1000 volunteers who help the Trust to make a real difference for nature You could be saving threatened habitats… ….Or surveying protected species You could be inspiring a child to try pond dipping… ….Or raising awareness in your local community Volunteers are an important and valued part of Surrey Wildlife Trust (SWT) and this is your chance to make a real contribution to local conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • East Surrey Walkers WALKS PROGRAMME & NEWSLETTER
    East Surrey Walkers WALKS PROGRAMME & NEWSLETTER APRIL - JUNE 2015 www.eastsurreywalkers.org.uk Chairman’s Chatter 2015 has started enthusiastically for ESW with good numbers on most walks; perhaps surprisingly much higher than during last summer. Not everyone can understand the attraction of walking in winter but I think many of us are glad to be outside, in the country, walking with our friends. Hopefully by the time you read this, the mud which has persisted on many routes will have reduced. Along with our existing members it's been good to see new faces on many of the walks, and thank you for making them welcome. As well as the traditional ways of attracting new members we now have Facebook and StreetLife entries. These are bringing ESW to the notice of new people who in turn have made favourable comments after joining a walk. Over the next couple of months we will be putting new posters and flyers in popular locations. If you know of new places where they should go, Keith Chesson will be glad of your help. Thanks to Tony P and Keith C for these initiatives. On 7th February ten ESW members attended the Ramblers Surrey Area AGM in Selsdon. After the routine business was completed, Des Garrahan, a Ramblers Trustee and the Lead Member for Development, spoke. He congratulated Surrey Area, firstly that the meeting was much better attended than most he goes to, and secondly that the Area has a full Committee. We are lucky to have people prepared to take on these roles.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps Collection
    HAYWARD MEMORIAL CENTRE CATALOGUE ENTRIES MAPS Cat. No. Acc.No. Type of Document Date Places/parish/ location Subject/Title/ Property Location in library Additional information HM/001/MAP O.S. Map 1914 Crowhurst & Marsh green SW 6" 3rd edition 36 (XXXVI) map cabinet copy from SHC HM/002/MAP O.S. Map 1914 Limpsfield Common & Chart, Hurst Green SW 6" 3rd edition 28 (XXVIII) map cabinet HM/003/MAP O.S. Map 1914 S. Godstone & Tandridge NE 6" 3rd edition 35 (XXXV) map cabinet 5 copies from SHC HM/004/MAP O.S. Map 1914 Crowhurst & Marlpit Hill NW 6" 3rd edition 36 (XXXVI) map cabinet 3 copies from SHC HM/005/MAP O.S. Map 1914 Lingfield, Dormans Land & Dry Hill NW 6" 3rd edition 43 (XLIII) map cabinet HM/006/MAP O.S. Map 1961 Lingfield, Felbridge & Dormans Park TQ 34 SE 6" map cabinet HM/007/MAP O.S. Map 1961 Starborough Castle, Dormans Lane & Dry Hill TQ 44 SW 6" map cabinet HM/008/MAP O.S. Map 1872/3 Dormans Land, Ashplatts, Dry Hill, Hammerwood 43 (all) 6" 1872/3 (XLIII) 1st edition map cabinet HM/009/MAP O.S. Map 1871 Chiddingstone, Hever, Edenbridge 36 (all) 6" (XXXVI) 1st edition map cabinet HM/010/MAP O.S. Map 1890s Godstone Green, Tilburstowill & Walkingstead 25" 2nd edn. 27.15 (XXVII.15) map cabinet HM/011/MAP O.S. Map 1912-14 Felcourt Heath, Chartham Park & The Grange 25" 3rd edn. 42.8 (XL.11.8) map cabinet HM/012/MAP O.S. Map 1912-14 Lingfield SW Plaistow Street & Felcourt 25" 3rd edn.
    [Show full text]
  • Tandridge District Council - Buildings of Character (November 2013)
    Tandridge District Council - Buildings of Character (November 2013) Although local Buildings of Character cannot be given the statutory protection afforded to listed buildings, the Council will seek to keep them wherever possible. The list can never be definitive as buildings may be added from time to time and the Council reserves the right to add to this list. Many of the Buildings of Character were added to the list before the Council adopted criteria for identifying such buildings and most of the buildings have not been reviewed against the criteria. Therefore if an owner has concerns about the inclusion of a building a request can be made to the Council to review it against the criteria. Multiple entries on the list can occur where there is more than one building on a property, for example a group of farm buildings. XREF YREF Address WARD NAME 531244.80 152962.60 Warwick Wold Farm Oakwood Road Merstham Redhill Bletchingley and Nutfield 532832.90 153005.70 Hermitage Hextalls Lane Bletchingley Redhill Bletchingley and Nutfield 532585.85 153668.95 Arthurs Seat White Hill Caterham Bletchingley and Nutfield 531632.45 151198.35 Cockley Cottage Big Common Lane Bletchingley Redhill Bletchingley and Nutfield 531634.90 151739.80 Little Pendell Pendell Mews Pendell Road Bletchingley Redhill Bletchingley and Nutfield 530231.75 149959.75 1 Priory Farm Cottages Sandy Lane South Nutfield Redhill Bletchingley and Nutfield 530226.00 149953.70 2 Priory Farm Cottages Sandy Lane South Nutfield Redhill Bletchingley and Nutfield 530107.75 149892.50 Little
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
    SES Water Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019: Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report Supporting Appendices Project Number: 60527524 August 2018 SES Water WRMP19 Environmental Report Appendices Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Graham McGrath Alastair Peattie Jane Sladen Assistant Consultant Associate Director Technical Director Revision History Revision Revision date Details Name Position 1 09 November 2017 Draft for internal review Graham McGrath Assistant Consultant 2 10 November 2017 Revised draft for approval Alastair Peattie Principal Consultant 3 15 November 2017 Draft for client review Jane Sladen Technical Director 4 30 November 2017 Final Alastair Peattie Principal Consultant 5 17 August 2018 Draft for final WRMP Alastair Peattie Associate Director 6 23 August 2018 Final Alastair Peattie Associate Director Prepared for: SES Water AECOM SES Water WRMP19 Environmental Report Appendices Prepared for: SES Water Prepared by: AECOM Limited 3rd Floor Portwall Place Portwall Lane Bristol BS1 6NA UK T: +44 117 901 7000 aecom.com © 2016 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: SES Water AECOM SES Water WRMP19 Environmental Report Appendices THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Prepared for: SES Water AECOM SES Water WRMP19 Environmental Report Appendices Table of Contents Appendix I: Regulatory requirements ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • October 2007 No. 11
    SURREY BOTANICALSOCIETY NEWSLETTER October 2007 No. 11 AGM SBS AGM - Boxhill Village Hall, Saturday 16th February 2008 starting at 2.0 pm. Please make an effort to attend. From the Hon. Secretary Anthony Anderson In spite of the ‘dreaded knees’ I have managed to attend about half the Field Meetings even if I haven’t always managed the whole day! I have thoroughly enjoyed meeting members old and new and continued to marvel at the expertise of our real botanists. I am sorry that Jane McLauchlin had only three including herself and a non-member for her second recording session at South Hawke but the weather was pretty awful leading up to that day and, indeed, that morning. This series of recordings undertaken by the Society for the National Trust comes to an end next May and it will be interesting to see the final results. Jane has done a sterling job over 5 years, sometimes with little support from the rest of us. I hope she feels it has all been worthwhile and I hope the Trust appreciates her efforts as well as those who have supported her. We tried an evening meeting again this year (see report on Page 12), and I feel it was a success and worth repeating even though the weather for a so-called summer evening in flaming June was less than helpful! Our impromptu visit to Chobham Common as a very late replacement for the cancelled meeting at Compton/Hogs Back was a great success with a good turn-out of members enjoying the Gentiana pneumonanthe (Marsh Gentian).
    [Show full text]