DOCSLIB.ORG

Green Sea Turtle and Dugong Food Resource Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Green Sea Turtle and Dugong Food Resource Assessment Green Sea Turtle and Dugong Food Resource Assessment Ashley Bunce and Peter Stratford 2007 Centre for Environmental Management Faculty of Science, Engineering and Health Central Queensland University Gladstone Qld 4680 Centre for Environmental MANAGEMENT FITZROY BASIN ASSOCIATION l!i l .• ...,<;;t~ - -!!..... QueellSiand ••,.""~ - Government Natural act on lferitage Salinity & Water Trust ll'ir,~t r.-.--..ut.-s Bcr;fj :tt; .A tt-f/Ntt/11 AUSTRA LI A ••, .... ~ ~ ·- llli a.tftM· ·~·. •• 363.70630994 35 23 Glad Pt Curtis Central Queensland l.!'IIVcRSJJ'\' Green Sea Turtle and Dugong Food Resource Assessment Fitzroy Basin Association and Queensland Parks and Wildlife Services Shoalwater Bay Seagrass Surveys: 2002 - 2006 Centre for Environmental MANAGEMENT Centre for Environmental Management Faculty of Science, Engineering and Health Central Queensland University Gladstone Qld 4680 Shoalwater Bay 2002 • 200iS TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... I LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ Ill LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................ VII 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 1 2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 SEAGRASS SPECIES DISTRIBUTION ........................................................................................ 4 2.2 ICON SPECIES ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................... 8 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS ................................................................................................. 10 3.1 SITE DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................. 10 3.1.1 Sampling Sites Selection.......................................................................................... 10 3.2 TIMING OF SURVEYS ............................................................................................................ 13 3.3 SAMPLING DESIGN .............................................................................................................. 13 r-----·-- --......_ 3.4 CHOICE OF VARIABLES ...........................................................................................:.-: .......... 14 3.5 PRECISION ISSUES AND INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE SIZE ................................................................. 15 3.6 SAMPLE COLLECTION AND PROCESSING .............................................................................. 16 3.6.1 Percent Cover and Species Composition ................................................................. 16 3. 6.2 Biomass Sampling.................................................................................................... 16 3.6.3 Nutritional analysis ................................................................................................... 17 3. 7 PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ...................................................................................................... 17 3.7.1 Temperature ............................................................................................................. 17 3.7.2 Rainfa/1 ...................................................................................................................... 18 3.7.3 Wind speed ............................................................................................................... 18 3. 7. 4 Sediment Composition ............................................................................................. 18 3.7.5 Lyngbya majuscula ................................................................................................... 19 3.8 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................... 19 3.8.1 Analysis of Variance ................................................................................................. 19 3. 8.2 Multivariate Analysis ................................................................................................. 20 4 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................. 22 4.1 SEAGRASS COVER .............................................................................................................. 22 4. 1.1 Temporal and Spatial Changes in Seagrass Cover ................................................. 26 4.2 SPECIES COMPOSITION ....................................................................................................... 30 Zostera capricorni ..................................................................................................................... 34 4.2. 1 Halophila ova/is ........................................................................................................ 34 4.2.2 Halodule uninervis .................................................................................................... 34 4.2.3 Cymodocea serrulata ............................................................................................... 39 I Cnnt,·e for Environm,.ntci'Aar.r.geme::J. CerJr~ii i..'5i!;~(!ns!71mtfk,lv,~!Sfiy ,0(} flu.> 1."1., 9, Gr'.Jdstone ~.'id 4680 _Green Sea Turtle and Du;;ong Fcod Re~our,~e A.!>sessmel_!.l ___._. ______ .____ .... ----·--------- 4.3 SEAGRASS BIOMASS ........................................................................................................... 39 4.3. 1 Above versus Below Ground Biomass ..................................................................... 50 4.3.2 Nutritional quality of seagrass .................................................................................. 50 4.4 TEMPERATURE .................................................................................................................... 58 4.5 RAINFALL ........................................................................................................................... 58 4.6 WIND SPEED ...................................................................................................................... 60 4. 7 SEDIMENT COMPOSITION .................................................................................................... 60 4.8 LYNGBYA MAJUSCULA ......................................................................................................... 63 5 DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................... 68 5.1 SEASONAL DISTRIBUTION .................................................................................................... 69 5.2 SEAGRASS DECLINE. ........................................................................................................... 70 5.3 DUGONGS AND GREEN SEA TURTLES .................................................................................. 72 6 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................... 73 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ 75 8 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 76 ii --··--·---~- ---·--·------- --- -----·- ··---·--·- ---· ------- Environmental""""""" .. M ll."lAOE.Mh.'•IT Shoalwater Cay 2002 - 2006 -------------·--------·--···--·-------·-···--·--·-- -----------'"----- LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location map of the five seagrass sampling sites within Shoalwater Bay, Queensland, Australia ............................................................................................................. 11 Figure 2: Sample collection at Duck Hole Creek, near Raspberry Creek in Shoalwater Bay..................................................................................................... ..................................... 12 Figure 3: Comparing seagrass sampling methods in Shoalwater Bay during pilot studies in November 2001. Note the size of the 1Ocm circle compared with the 50cm x 50cm quadrat. ......................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 4: Temperature loggers deployed on the Sabina Point seagrass meadow, March 2005........................................................................................................................................ 18 Figure 5: Mean seagrass cover (±SE) for each year of sampling at the five sites within Shoalwater Bay. Data are also shown as means for all sites combined. n = 480 quadrats x 5 sites x 4 years = 9,600....................................................................................... 23 Figure 6: Mean seagrass cover (±SE) for each season of sampling at the five sites within Shoalwater Bay. Data are also shown as means for all sites combined. n = 480 per season per site .......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Karyomorphometric Analysis of Somatic Chromosomes of Selected
    Aquatic Botany 133 (2016) 45–49 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aquatic Botany jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aquabot Short communication Karyomorphometric analysis of somatic chromosomes of selected seagrasses of families Hydrocharitaceae and Cymodoceaceae ∗ K. Vanitha, Pon. Subhashini, T. Thangaradjou Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, Annamalai University, Parangipettai 608 502, Cuddloare, India a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Chromosome numbers of eleven seagrass species were determined. The highest chromosome number Received 22 July 2015 was recorded in Halodule spp. (2n = 44) and the lowest chromosome number was observed in Cymodocea Received in revised form 15 May 2016 rotundata (2n = 14). Chromosome numbers were identical or closely related among different species in Accepted 17 May 2016 the same genus. Karyomorphology was mapped for nine species (Halodule pinifolia, Halodule uninervis, Available online 24 May 2016 Halodule wrightii, Syringodium isoetifolium, Enhalus acoroides, Halophila beccarii, Halophila ovalis (subsp. ovalis and ramamurthiana) Halophila ovata and Thalassia hemprichii). Length of the chromosomes of these Keywords: species varied from 7.81 to 336.63 ␮m while the fundamental arm number ranged between 36 and 85. Marine angiosperms Cytogenetics The results confirm the karyotypic variation among the studied species, indicating that this characteristic Karyomorphology can be used to confirm taxonomic identity of species which are morphologically very similar (eg. Halodule Karyotypic formula spp.). All tested species were diploid, except for Cymodocea rotundata. Indian ocean © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction bers indicates inconsistency for the same species, however such information would add knowledge on the evolution of the genera Seagrasses represents the paraphyletic group of marine and family in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Seagrass Distribution and Diversity: a Bioregional Model ⁎ F
    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 3–20 www.elsevier.com/locate/jembe Global seagrass distribution and diversity: A bioregional model ⁎ F. Short a, , T. Carruthers b, W. Dennison b, M. Waycott c a Department of Natural Resources, University of New Hampshire, Jackson Estuarine Laboratory, Durham, NH 03824, USA b Integration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD 21613, USA c School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811 Queensland, Australia Received 1 February 2007; received in revised form 31 May 2007; accepted 4 June 2007 Abstract Seagrasses, marine flowering plants, are widely distributed along temperate and tropical coastlines of the world. Seagrasses have key ecological roles in coastal ecosystems and can form extensive meadows supporting high biodiversity. The global species diversity of seagrasses is low (b60 species), but species can have ranges that extend for thousands of kilometers of coastline. Seagrass bioregions are defined here, based on species assemblages, species distributional ranges, and tropical and temperate influences. Six global bioregions are presented: four temperate and two tropical. The temperate bioregions include the Temperate North Atlantic, the Temperate North Pacific, the Mediterranean, and the Temperate Southern Oceans. The Temperate North Atlantic has low seagrass diversity, the major species being Zostera marina, typically occurring in estuaries and lagoons. The Temperate North Pacific has high seagrass diversity with Zostera spp. in estuaries and lagoons as well as Phyllospadix spp. in the surf zone. The Mediterranean region has clear water with vast meadows of moderate diversity of both temperate and tropical seagrasses, dominated by deep-growing Posidonia oceanica.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates MARINE and COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS of ABU DHABI EMIRATE, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
    of Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates MARINE AND COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS OF ABU DHABI EMIRATE, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Page . II of Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates Page . III MARINE AND COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS OF ABU DHABI EMIRATE, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Page . IV MARINE AND COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS OF ABU DHABI EMIRATE, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES H. H. Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan President of the United Arab Emirates Page . V MARINE AND COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS OF ABU DHABI EMIRATE, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Page . VI MARINE AND COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS OF ABU DHABI EMIRATE, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES H. H. Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces Page . VII MARINE AND COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS OF ABU DHABI EMIRATE, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Page . VIII MARINE AND COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS OF ABU DHABI EMIRATE, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES H. H. Sheikh Hamdan bin Zayed Al Nahyan Deputy Prime Minister Page . IX MARINE AND COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS OF ABU DHABI EMIRATE, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES s\*?*c*i]j6.%;M"%&9+~)#"$*&ENL`\&]j6. =';78G=%1?%&'12= !"##$" 9<8*TPEg-782#,On%O)6=]KL %&'( )*+,-. 2#,On#X%3G=FON&$4#*.%&9+~)#"$*&XNL %?)#$*&E, &]1TL%&9+%?)':5=&4O`(.#`g-78 %!/ اﻷوراق اﻟﻘﻄﺎﻋﻴﺔ fJT=V-=>?#Fk9+*#$'&= /%*?%=*<(/8>OhT7.F 012(.%34#56.%-78&9+:;(<=>=?%@8'-/ABC $L#01i%;1&&!580.9,q@EN(c D)=EF%3G&H#I7='J=:KL)'MD*7.%&'-(8=';78G=NO D)$8P#"%;QI8ABCRI7S;<#D*T(8%.I7)=U%#$#VW'.X JG&Bls`ItuefJ%27=PE%u%;QI8)aEFD)$8%7iI=H*L YZZ[\&F]17^)#G=%;/;!N_-LNL`%3;%87VW'.X NL]17~Is%1=fq-L4"#%;M"~)#"G=,|2OJ*c*TLNLV(ItuG= )aE0@##`%;Kb&9+*c*T(`d_-8efJG=g-78012
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Phylogenetic Regionalization of Marine Plants Reveals Close Evolutionary Affinities Among Disjunct Temperate Assemblages Barna
    Phylogenetic regionalization of marine plants reveals close evolutionary affinities among disjunct temperate assemblages Barnabas H. Darua,b,*, Ben G. Holtc, Jean-Philippe Lessardd,e, Kowiyou Yessoufouf and T. Jonathan Daviesg,h aDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Harvard University Herbaria, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA bDepartment of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, Pretoria, South Africa cDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, United Kingdom dQuebec Centre for Biodiversity Science, Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada eDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, H4B 1R6, Canada; fDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida campus, Florida 1710, South Africa gDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada hAfrican Centre for DNA Barcoding, University of Johannesburg, PO Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa *Corresponding author Email: [email protected] (B.H. Daru) Running head: Phylogenetic regionalization of seagrasses 1 Abstract While our knowledge of species distributions and diversity in the terrestrial biosphere has increased sharply over the last decades, we lack equivalent knowledge of the marine world. Here, we use the phylogenetic tree of seagrasses along with their global distributions and a metric of phylogenetic beta diversity to generate a phylogenetically-based delimitation of marine phytoregions (phyloregions). We then evaluate their evolutionary affinities and explore environmental correlates of phylogenetic turnover between them. We identified 11 phyloregions based on the clustering of phylogenetic beta diversity values. Most phyloregions can be classified as either temperate or tropical, and even geographically disjunct temperate regions can harbor closely related species assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • Extension Bulletin on Seagrasses
    CYANMAGENTAYELLOWBLACK Extension Bulletin THE WEALTH OF INDIA RAW MATERIALS SERIES (A Wealth of information on Plants, Animals and Minerals of India) SEAGRASS FLOWERS For further details and information on Seagrasses please contact: Dr. Nobi E. P., Research Assistant (Environment), Ministry of Environment and Forests CGO Complex, New Delhi-110003, (Formerly Scientist-Fellow, CSIR-NISCAIR) E-mail: [email protected] SEAGRASSES THE OXYGEN PUMPS IN THE SEA For more information on The Wealth of India - Indian Raw Materials Series please contact: Dr (Mrs.) Sunita Garg Ms Nidhi Chaudhary Chief Scientist & Head Research Intern (Botany) E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Ph: 25846001; 25846301 Ext. 258/328/303 Ph: 25846301 Ext. 230 Mr. R. S. Jayasomu Mrs D. Leela Rama Mani Senior Principal Scientist Research Intern (Zoology) E-mail: [email protected] Ph: 25846301 Ext. 278 Ph: 25846301 Ext. 273/278 Mrs Renu Manchanda Mr. P. R. Bhagwat Senior Technical Officer Principal Technical Officer E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Ph: 25846301 Ext. 303 Ph: 25846301 Ext. 328 For ordering Wealth of India complete set or individual volumes Demand Draft should be marked payable to NISCAIR, New Delhi and sent to: Head, Sales and Marketing Wealth of India Division CSIR-National Institute of Science Communication And Information Resources CSIR-National Institute of Science Communication Dr. K. S. Krishnan Marg, Pusa Campus, New Delhi-110 012, India And Information Resources, Phones: + 91-11-25843359, 2584603-7 Extn. 287/288 Fax: +91-11-25847062; Dr K S Krishnan Marg, New Delhi-110 012 and E-mail: [email protected] S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Behaviour, Activity Pattern and Substrate Preferences of Green
    AEW-80439 MSc Thesis Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management The behaviour, activity pattern and substrate use of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in a heavily grazed seagrass meadow, East Kalimantan, Indonesia Iris (I.I.) de Winter Registration number WU: 890216 963 090 Thesis serial number WU: 014/2012 Registration number RU: 4178696 Thesis serial number RU: 410 Date: 05-07-2012 Supervisors: Dr. Rudi (R.M.M.) Roijackers (Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands) Marjolijn (M.J.A.) Christianen (Environmental Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands) Dr. Marieke (M.M.) van Katwijk (Environmental Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands) The behaviour, activity pattern and substrate use of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in a heavily grazed seagrass meadow, East Kalimantan, Indonesia Iris (I.I.) de Winter Master Biology, specialization Ecology Department of Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Wageningen University and Research Centre Department of Environmental Sciences Radboud University Nijmegen Registration number WU: 890216 963 090 Thesis serial number WU: 014/2012 Registration number RU: 4178696 Thesis serial number RU: 410 Thesis code: AEW-80439 Supervisors: Wageningen University Dr. Rudi (R.M.M.) Rooijackers Radboud University Nijmegen Marjolijn (M.J.A.) Christianen Dr. Marieke (M.M.) van Katwijk Title page photograph: Green turtle, Chelonia mydas (I. de Winter, 26-01-2012) Table of contents Preface ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Open-Source Transcriptomics Landscape for Phylogenetically
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN SeagrassDB: An open-source transcriptomics landscape for phylogenetically profled Received: 12 June 2017 Accepted: 11 December 2017 seagrasses and aquatic plants Published: xx xx xxxx Gaurav Sablok1, Regan J. Hayward1, Peter A. Davey1, Rosiane P. Santos 2, Martin Schliep1, Anthony Larkum1, Mathieu Pernice 1, Rudy Dolferus3 & Peter J. Ralph1 Seagrasses and aquatic plants are important clades of higher plants, signifcant for carbon sequestration and marine ecological restoration. They are valuable in the sense that they allow us to understand how plants have developed traits to adapt to high salinity and photosynthetically challenged environments. Here, we present a large-scale phylogenetically profled transcriptomics repository covering seagrasses and aquatic plants. SeagrassDB encompasses a total of 1,052,262 unigenes with a minimum and maximum contig length of 8,831 bp and 16,705 bp respectively. SeagrassDB provides access to 34,455 transcription factors, 470,568 PFAM domains, 382,528 prosite models and 482,121 InterPro domains across 9 species. SeagrassDB allows for the comparative gene mining using BLAST-based approaches and subsequent unigenes sequence retrieval with associated features such as expression (FPKM values), gene ontologies, functional assignments, family level classifcation, Interpro domains, KEGG orthology (KO), transcription factors and prosite information. SeagrassDB is available to the scientifc community for exploring the functional genic landscape of seagrass and aquatic plants at: http://115.146.91.129/index.php. Transcriptomics-assisted gene mining approaches have been widely used for understanding the physiological implications of how an organism responds to biotic and abiotic stress conditions. Next generation sequencing (NGS) based transcriptomics has not only accelerated but has also played a key role in the identifcation of new functional genes across diverse species, which has been leveraged to understand the genetic basis of ecological adaptation to their surrounding environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrasses from the Philippines
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE MARINE SCIENCES •NUMBER 21 Seagrasses from the Philippines Ernani G. Mefiez, Ronald C. Phillips, and Hilconida P. Calumpong ISSUED DEC 11983 SMITHSONIAN PUBLICATIONS SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1983 ABSTRACT Menez, Ernani G., Ronald C. Phillips, and Hilconida P. Calumpong. Sea­ grasses from the Philippines. Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences, number 21, 40 pages, 26 figures, 1983.—Seagrasses were collected from various islands in the Philippines during 1978-1982. A total of 12 species in seven genera are recorded. Generic and specific keys, based on vegetative characters, are provided for easier differentiation of the seagrasses. General discussions of seagrass biology, ecology, collection and preservation are presented. Local and world distribution of Philippine seagrasses are also included. OFFICIAL PUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution's annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIES COVER DESIGN: Seascape along the Atlantic coast of eastern North America. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Menez, Ernani G. Seagrasses from the Philippines. (Smithsonian contributions to the marine sciences ; no. 21) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: SI 1.41:21 1. Seagrasses—Philippines. I. Phillipps, Ronald C. II. Calumpong, Hilconida P. III. Ti­ tle. IV. Series. QK495.A14M46 1983 584.73 83-600168 Contents Page Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 3 Materials and Methods 3 Collecting and Preserving Seagrasses 4 General Features of Seagrass Biology and Ecology 6 Key to the Philippine Seagrasses 7 Division ANTHOPHYTA 8 Class MONOCOTYLEDONEAE 8 Order HELOBIAE 8 Family POTAMOGETONACEAE 8 Cymodocea rotundata Ehrenberg and Hemprich, ex Ascherson 8 Cymodocea serrulata (R.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary and Bacterial Productivity of Tropical Seagrass Communities in the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 61: 145-157, 1990 Published March 8 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. l Primary and bacterial productivity of tropical seagrass communities in the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia D. J. W. Moriarty, D. G.Roberts*, P. C. Pollard CSIRO Marine Laboratories, PO Box 120, Cleveland, Queensland 4163, Australia ABSTRACT- Plant and bacterial productivities were compared at different seasons in 3 communities of seagrass in the Gulf of Carpentaria. Australia, in 1985. Seagrass biomass and shoot density were very variable, with no seasonal trend. The gross primary productivity of the seagrasses in each of the communities (Syringodium isoetifoliurn with Cymodocea serrulata in a bay, Halodule uninervis at a river mouth, and Thalassia hernprichii with Cymodocea rotundata on a reef flat) were determined seasonally from rates of lacuna1 gas production. Productivity varied seasonally, being lowest in winter (July).Values ranged from 0.6 to 1.0 g C m-2 d-' for C. serrulata, 0.3 to 8.1 for S. isoetifolium, 0 9 to 3.5 for H. uninervis, 0.2 to 0.4 for T henlprichii and 0.1 to 1.0 for C. rotundata. Gross community primary productivity, measured from diurnal changes in oxygen concentration in the water column, ranged from 3.3 in winter to 9.3 g C m-2 d-' in summer at the bay site, 2.7 to 4 at the river mouth and 3.3 to 8.4 on the reef flat. Bacterial productivity was determined using the rate of tritiated thymidine incorporation into DNA. Most (90 to 95 %) bacterial biomass was produced in the sediment.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying an Integrated Approach to Coastal Marine Habitat Mapping in the North-Western United Arab Emirates
    Marine Environmental Research 161 (2020) 105095 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Environmental Research journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marenvrev Applying an integrated approach to coastal marine habitat mapping in the north-western United Arab Emirates Daniel Mateos-Molina a,b,*, Marina Antonopoulou a, Rob Baldwin c, Ivonne Bejarano d,e, John A. Burt f, Jose A. García-Charton b, Saif M. Al-Ghais g,h, Jayanthi Walgamage c, Oliver J. S. Taylor c a Emirates Nature - World Wide Fund, PO Box 454891, Dubai, United Arab Emirates b Departamento de Ecología e Hidrología, Universidad de Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100, Murcia, Spain c Five Oceans Environmental Services LLC, P.O. Box 660, 131, Muscat, Oman d Biology, Chemistry and Environmental Sciences Department, American University of Sharjah, PO Box 26666, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates e Emirates Marine Environment Group, P.O. Box 12399, Dubai, United Arab Emirates f Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi, PO Box 129188, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates g United Arab Emirates Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, UAE University, P.O. Box 17551, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates h Environment Protection and Development Authority, P.O. Box 11377, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Habitat mapping is essential for the management and conservation of coastal marine habitats. However, accurate Habitat mapping and up-to-date habitat maps are rarely available for the marine realm. In this study, we mapped the coastal Coastal marine habitats marine habitats of >400 km of coastline in the north-western United Arab Emirates (UAE) using a combination of Data integration data sources including remote sensing, extensive ground-truthing points, local expert knowledge and existing United Arab Emirates information.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Temporal Fluctuations of Two Interdital Seagrass-Bed
    pJi,l Marine Biology 117. 139-144 (1993) Marine iB t' ===.dUYW.l.. Biology @ Springer-Verlag 1993 Structure and temporal fluctuations of two intertidal seagrass-bed communities in New Caledonia (SW Pacific Ocean) J. Baron '*, J. Clavier ', B. A. Thomassin ' I ORSTOM, Centre de Nouméa, B.P. A5. Noumta, New Caledonia ' Station Marine d'Endoume, Rue de la Batterie des Lions, F-13007 Marseille. France Received: 15 March 1993 / Accepted: 6 May 1993 Abstract. The structure and trophic organization of two the structure of the intertidal seagrass-bed communities is intertidal seagrass-bed communities (Halodule uninervis but partially known. Some harbour sizeable populations and Thalassia heinprichii) were examined on the south- of bivalves of economic interest, such as Gafrarium tu- west coast of New Caledonia (SW Pacific Ocean), from midum Röding, 1798 and Anadara scapha (L., 1758) (Bar- April 1989 to March 1990. Five benthic samples were on and Clavier 1992) and are now threatened by a num- collected from each site at 2 mo intervals and various ber of tourism-oriented projects. Examination of the ben- environmental parameters were simultaneously moni- thic communities associated with these bivalves appears tored. Anima1:plant biomass ratios were close to 1 at of primary importance in order to provide a basis for both sites. Polychaetes dominated in number of species. future monitoring of human impact. The present study The suspension-feeding bivalves Gafrarium tumidum and describes the structure and organization (sensu Watling Anudara scapha constituted the greater part of the animal 1975 and Bachelet 1981) of two such communities by biomass. The evolution of the communities over an annu- examining their specific composition and their numerical al cycle displayed marked structural and organizational and biomass distributions as a function of trophic group.
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrasses in Queensland Waters
    Seagrasses in Queensland waters CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE March 2004 Seagrasses are flowering plants that live in the coastal waters of most of the worlds’ continents. They are the main diet of dugongs and green turtles and provide a habitat for many, smaller marine animals, some of which, like prawns and fish, are commercially important. They also absorb nutrients from coastal run-off and stabilise sediment, helping to keep the water clear. Australia has more seagrass species than any other continent. Of some 60 seagrass species found worldwide, 30 species are found in Australia and 15 species are found in Queensland. Some seagrass meadows are so extensive they can be seen from a space shuttle orbiting earth. It is estimated that there are nearly 6,000km2 of seagrass in Queensland waters shallower than 15 metres, and that up to 40,000km2 of the waters deeper than 15 metres of the Great Barrier Reef lagoon are likely to have some seagrass. of species of seagrass are found near the tip of the nutrients that support plant growth. Grazers Biology of seagrass Cape York with a gradual decline in number of such as dugongs, green turtles and some fish can species down the east coast. There is a transition also change the structure of Queensland Since the time of the dinosaurs, three groups of from subtropical to temperate seagrasses south seagrass communities over space and time. flowering plants (angiosperms) colonised the of Moreton Bay in southern Queensland. oceans. Known as ‘seagrasses’, they are the only Seagrass can reproduce through sexual or flowering plants that can live underwater.
    [Show full text]