Community Directory
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SITUATION of POLLING STATIONS UK Parliamentary East Hampshire Constituency
SITUATION OF POLLING STATIONS UK Parliamentary East Hampshire Constituency Date of Election: Thursday 8 June 2017 Hours of Poll: 7:00 am to 10:00 pm Notice is hereby given that: The situation of Polling Stations and the description of persons entitled to vote thereat are as follows: Ranges of electoral Ranges of electoral Station register numbers of Station register numbers of Situation of Polling Station Situation of Polling Station Number persons entitled to vote Number persons entitled to vote thereat thereat Alton Community Centre, Amery Street, St Mary`s R C Church Hall, 59 Normandy 1 AA-1 to AA-1848 2 AB-1 to AB-1961 Alton Street, Alton St Mary`s R C Church Hall, 59 Normandy Holybourne Village Hall, Church Lane, 3 AC-1 to AC-2083 4 AD-1 to AD-1558 Street, Alton Holybourne, Alton Alton Community Centre, Amery Street, 5 AE-1 to AE-2380 All Saints Parish Hall, Queens Road, Alton 6 AF-1 to AF-2418 Alton St John Ambulance Hq, Edgar Hall, Anstey Beech Village Hall, Wellhouse Road, 7 AG-1 to AG-1775/1 8 AH-1 to AH-484/4 Lane Beech Bentworth Jubilee Hall, Church Street, Bentley Memorial Hall, Hole Lane, Bentley 9 AI-1 to AI-892 10 AJ-1 to AJ-465 Bentworth Binsted Sports Pavillion, The Sports Jolly Farmer Public House (Skittle Alley), 11 AKA-1 to AKA-562 12 AKB-1 to AKB-893 Pavillion, The Street, Binsted Binsted Road, Blacknest Liphook Church Centre, Portsmouth Road, Liphook Church Centre, Portsmouth Road, 13 AL-1 to AL-1802 14 AL-1803 to AL-3605/5 Liphook Liphook Liphook Millennium Centre, 2 Ontario Way, Liphook Millennium Centre, 2 Ontario -
Special Collections Online
• 1104 RI<~F TRADE~. ( HAMPFEIRE • REFRESHMENT RooMs-continued. Eccleshall J. & Sons, Pier street, San- Lodge A. 2()6 Commercial rd. Landpi1 Alesso Emilio, 23 King's rd. Sthsea down, Isle of Wight Lowe Mrs. S. Blackgang,Chale,Ventnr Andrews Mrs. M. 53Normandy st . .A..ltn Edwards Miss Mary, Medina rd.Cowes ¥adden Mrs. Eliza, 6t Forton l'Oad, Applin Mrs. Louisa., I3 Stour road, Emery John, 43 High street, Alton Forton, Gosport Christchurch English Mrs. Emily L. The Home" ~adden John, Handyman Avery Mrs. F. 19 Ordnance rd.Portsea stead, Highcliff, Christchurch Unicorn road; 7, g, II & I3 Spring Baker Fredk. 53 Osborne rd. Southsea Evans J. & Co. Lee-on-the-Solent, street & Station street, I.a.ndport Balfry Cecil, Toll Gate house, Slea- Gosport Marshall Mrs. L. Redhill, .Moordown, ford, Bordon Evans & Co.13 Above Bar st.Sthmptn Bournemouth Barton Frederick A. 6 Pier st. Ryde Fall Mrs. Alice, Victoria road, Wool- Martin Mrs. S. C. 86 Wimborne rd. Barton Tea House (Mrs. Zoe Fur- ston, Southampton Winton, Bournemouth neau:x, proprietress), Barton-on-Sea, Ferrari & Jacomelli, IBo High street, Mattocks J. 26 Triangle, Bournemth :New Milton SouthamlJtOn Mitchell Henry, I Parkwood l'O!id, Basselt R.2 to 6Commercial pl.Landpt Ferris Chas. I.B .A..lbert rd.Southmptn Pokesdown, Bournemouth Beacham Francis, Branksome chine, Ferris Silvanus John, 59 Victoria rd. Moretti & Lambert, 139, I40 & 141 BranksQme park, Bournemouth W uolston, Southampton High street, Southampton Beer Mrs. G. IBChurch st.Christchrch Field .A..lbt. Church st. Whitchurch Morgan Goorg~. 332 Shirley road, Bell Mrs. E. Lee-on-the-Solent,Gosprt Fisher Hy. -
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: Interim Supplement Incorporating Sequential Test
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: Interim Supplement Incorporating Sequential Test For the East Hampshire District Local Plan Regulation 18 consultation December 2018 SFRA Interim Supplement 2018 Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Background 3.0 Local Flood Risk Context 4.0 Planning Context 5.0 Site Requiring Sequential/Exception Test 6.0 Conclusion Appendix 1 – Sequential Testing Scoring on LAA sites and sites brought forward from the development plan Appendix 2 – Sequential Test Methodology and Scoring Criteria Appendix 3 – A list of sites with planning permission 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This document supplements the East Hampshire Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA), October 2018 and supports the East Hampshire Local Plan 2017–2036 (Regulation 18 consultation). The purpose of this document is to demonstrate that proposed site allocations in areas of flood risk are appropriate in the context of the Sequential Test which are required as part of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and its accompanying National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG). However, as this is the first public consultation on the East Hampshire draft Local Plan, the Exception Test has not been carried out at this stage (Regulation 18) as allocations may be subject to change. Those allocations that may require an Exception Test prior to the Proposed Submission Local Plan 2017-2036 (Regulation 19) will be carried out at that time. 1.2 The East Hampshire Local Plan covers the area of East Hampshire outside of the South Downs National Park. This area is known as the Planning Authority area (the ‘Area’). The SFRA 2018 therefore covers the Planning Authority area only but during its preparation neighbouring authorities were consulted to address any cross boundary flood issues to inform the SFRA. -
Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62 -
Planning Agenda
Planning Agenda You are hereby invited to attend the PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING of Binsted Parish Council on Thursday August 1st 2019 @ The Pavilion, Binsted GU34 4PB at 7.00pm Sue Hodder Clerk 1. Apologies for absence 2. Chairman’s announcements 3. Declarations of Interest: Councillors are reminded of their responsibility to declare any disclosable pecuniary interest which they may have in any item of business on the agenda no later than when that item is reached. Unless dispensation has been granted, you may not participate in any discussion of, or vote on, any matter in which you have a pecuniary interest. You must withdraw from the room or chamber when the meeting discusses and votes on the matter. 4. To consider requests for Dispensations to allow Councillor’s with Pecuniary Interests to speak and vote Planning Applications received a. SDNP/19/02052 Location: 2 Wheatley Place, Wheatley Lane, Kingsley GU35 9PA Proposal: Single storey rear extension following demolition of existing rear extensions b. SDNP/19/03172/HOUS Location: 15 Clements Close, Binsted Alton GU34 4NY Proposal: Conservatory following demolition of existing conservatory c. 32576/004 Location: 5 Weybank, Bentley Farnham GU10 5LB Proposal: Single storey extension to front and porch canopy to front d. SDNP/19/03220/HOUS Location: Per Ardua, Back Lane, Bucks Horn Oak, Farnham GU10 4LW Proposal: Revised plan to reposition front dormer, additional front dormer, pitched roof in lieu of garage flat roof,3 additional sky lights, parapet to side flat roof, pitched roof in lieu of flat roof over utility. e. SDNP/19/02915/HOUS Location: Shumac, Back Lane, Bucks Horn Oak, Farnham GU10 4LN Proposal: Single storey garage extension and garage conversion addition of dormers to front and rear. -
WOOLMER FOREST LIBERAL DEMOCRATS (WFLD)1 COMMENTS on COMMISSION’S DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS (V1.4) General 1
WARD BOUNDARY REVIEW 2017 WOOLMER FOREST LIBERAL DEMOCRATS (WFLD)1 COMMENTS ON COMMISSION’S DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS (V1.4) General 1. This is WFLD’s response to the Commission’s draft recommendations on Liphook, Headley Whitehill Chase, Whitehill Hogmoor & Greatham wards. We accept the recommendations on Grayshott, Lindford and the single-councillor wards in Whitehill & Bordon. 2. We are disappointed by the Commission’s decision to create yet more, multi-councillor wards, especially after most respondents stated their preference for retaining the existing ward structure with its single-councillor wards. As we stressed in our earlier submission, these give an electoral advantage to the biggest party, make it exceedingly difficult for independent candidates and smaller parties to stand and discourages large swathes of the electorate from voting, as can be seen by the poor turnout in local elections. 3. Our experience, from talking to thousands of voters on the doorstep, confirms this discouraging trend. Where there are single-councillor wards most voters tend to get to know the candidates, read their policies and ask questions; in multi-councillor wards most just vote along tribal lines on the assumption that ‘their party has selected the best candidates.’ Indeed, in these larger wards voters seem to lose interest in both the candidates and their policies. This trend is borne out by the consistent party vote ratio in most district elections. Giving voters’ more than one vote does not create electoral equality, it just leads to one party rule which isn’t good for democracy. 4. As we explained, in our initial proposals, we had provided maps on splitting the wards within the existing boundaries. -
Whitehill & Bordon Eco-Town Traffic Management Strategy Hampshire
Whitehill & Bordon Eco-town Traffic Management Strategy Hampshire County Council February 2013 QM Issue/revision Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Revision 4 Remarks SECOND DRAFT FINAL DRAFT FINAL REPORT FINAL REPORT Date 16/03/12 13/04/12 17/09/2012 19/02/2013 Prepared by Chris Williams Chris Williams Chris Williams Chris Williams Signature Chris Williams Chris Williams Chris Williams Chris Williams Checked by Nigel Wilkinson Nigel Wilkinson Nigel Wilkinson Peter Day Signature Nigel Wilkinson Nigel Wilkinson Nigel Wilkinson Peter Day Authorised by Peter Day Peter Day Peter Day Peter Day Signature Peter Day Peter Day Peter Day Project number 11581409 11581409 11581409 11581409 File reference J:\11581407 - Whitehill Bordon - Traffic Management Study\TEXT\REPORTS\Whitehill & Bordon Eco-town TM Strategy - February 2013 WSP UK Limited Mountbatten House Basing View Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 4HJ Tel: +44 (0)1256 318800 Fax: +44 (0)1256 318700 http://www.wspgroup.com WSP UK Limited | Registered Address WSP House, 70 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1AF, UK | Reg No. 01383511 England | WSP Group plc | Offices worldwide Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1 Preamble and Background 3 2 National and Local Policy Context 5 3 Eco-town Proposals 9 4 Data Collection 17 5 Town & Parish Council / Public Consultation 23 6 Summary of Existing Concerns 26 7 Option Evaluation 40 8 Proposed Traffic Management Strategy 50 9 Summary & Conclusions Traffic Management Strategy 77 Appendices Appendix A – Phase 1 Consultation Meetings Minutes and Correspondence Appendix B – Phase 2 Consultation Minutes and Correspondence Appendix C – Phase 3 Consultation Responses Appendix D – Matrix of Traffic Management Measures Executive Summary The aim of this study is to develop a Traffic Management Strategy that will provide practical and deliverable strategies for the implementation of physical and softer measures to reduce the impact of the Eco-town proposals on local villages and communities, and to discourage the use by traffic of inappropriate routes. -
HAMPSHIRE Two Buildings on the Isle of Wight Are Included Below the Table for Hampshire
Tree ring dated buildings © VAG 2021 INDEX OF TREE-RING DATED BUILDINGS IN ENGLAND COUNTY LIST approximately in chronological order, revised to VA51 (2020). © Vernacular Architecture Group 2021 These files may be copied for personal use, but should not be published or further distributed without written permission from the Vernacular Architecture Group. Always access these tables via the VAG website. Unauthorised copies released without prior consent on search engines may be out of date and unreliable. Since 2016 a very small number of construction date ranges from historical sources have been added. These entries are entirely in italics. Before using the index you are recommended to read or print the introduction and guidance, which includes a key to the abbreviations used on the tables HAMPSHIRE Two buildings on the Isle of Wight are included below the table for Hampshire. County – Felling date Placename Address VA ref Description / keywords NGR Historic range HE ref and later Other refs Hamps 1244 -1249 Hambledon Manor Farm 30.106 Oxf Bishop’s house. Stone. This date is for floor joists, but they might not be in a primary SU 646151 context. Also see 1473 -78. Hamps 1248 + Bentworth Hall Place 39.135 Oxf Aisled hall. Date from arcade plate in hall range was1248 +, but primary timbers in SU 663399 porch dated 1295 -1327 (qv) Hamps 1249 1250 Wherwell The Old Stables, 27.99 Oxf Guest hall or infirmary. Raised aisle roof 8.23m wide. Mortice & tenoned straight arch- SU 392406 Wherwell Priory (1) braces up to tiebeam and arcade braces; passing braces, notched lap joints, ashlar pieces? (not shown in Fig 1.8 in Roberts), splayed and tabled scarf. -
Neighbourhood Character Study for East Hampshire District Council Classification and Description December 2018
Neighbourhood Character Study for East Hampshire District Council Classification and Description December 2018 Section 3: 4. Site Specific Character Area Studies 4.2. North Eastern part of East Hampshire 4. Site Specific Character Area Studies 4.2. North Eastern part of East Hampshire 101 North Eastern part of East Hampshire The Study Areas 4.2.1. Neighbourhood character studies were undertaken for seven areas in the North-East part of East Hampshire and are listed from north-east to south-west: 9. Headley Fields (current H9 Policy Area) 10. Headley Down (current H10 Policy Area) 11. Whitmore Vale and Hammer Lane (suggested as potential H9/H10 policy area) 12. Kingswood Firs, Grayshott (current H9 Policy Area) 13. Waggoners Way Estate (suggested as potential H9/H10 policy area) 14. Eastern Liphook 15. Chiltley Way Area, Liphook (current H9 Policy Area) The study area of Headley Fields is situated on the southern side of Headley, within, but abutting the settlement boundary. The study area of Headley Down lies within Headley Down settlement boundary. Kingswood Firs lies within the settlement boundary of Grayshott on the western side, whilst Waggoners Estate lies to the west of the settlement. Eastern Liphook and the Chiltley Way Area are within but abutting the settlement boundary of Liphook. Whitmore Vale and Hammer Lane area of interest is situated within an area designated as countryside. Landscape Character Areas of North Eastern part of East Hampshire 4.2.2. The Landscape setting of this part of Hampshire is characterised predominantly by the Greensand Hills to the East, and by Lowland Mosaic Small Scale to the West and Lowland Mosaic Heath Associated to the South. -
18 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
18 bus time schedule & line map 18 Aldershot - Whitehill/High Lane Estate View In Website Mode The 18 bus line (Aldershot - Whitehill/High Lane Estate) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Aldershot: 5:41 AM - 8:50 PM (2) Bordon Camp: 5:50 AM - 8:15 PM (3) Farnham: 7:40 AM - 6:43 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 18 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 18 bus arriving. Direction: Aldershot 18 bus Time Schedule 58 stops Aldershot Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 8:43 AM - 7:45 PM Monday 5:41 AM - 8:50 PM Eco Station, Bordon Camp St Lucia Park, Whitehill Civil Parish Tuesday 5:41 AM - 8:50 PM Community Centre, Bordon Wednesday 5:41 AM - 8:50 PM Canada Way, Bordon Thursday Not Operational Friday 5:41 AM - 8:50 PM Catholic Church, Bordon Saturday 6:54 AM - 8:59 PM Saville Crescent, Bordon Branson Road, Bordon Norman Close, Bordon 18 bus Info Direction: Aldershot Neptune Road, Bordon Stops: 58 Trip Duration: 66 min Apollo Drive, Whitehill Civil Parish Line Summary: Eco Station, Bordon Camp, Forest Centre, Bordon Community Centre, Bordon, Canada Way, Bordon, Catholic Church, Bordon, Saville Crescent, Bordon, Pinehill Road, Whitehill Civil Parish Branson Road, Bordon, Norman Close, Bordon, Jacaranda Road, Bordon Neptune Road, Bordon, Forest Centre, Bordon, Jacaranda Road, Bordon, Forest Surgery, Bordon, Forest Road, Whitehill, Bus Turning Circle, Whitehill, Forest Surgery, Bordon Oldƒeld Close, Bordon, Highview Business Centre, DENE CLOSE, Whitehill Civil Parish Bordon, Canada Way, -
Design & Access Statement Unit 2
DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT UNIT 2 Replacement HALFWAY FARM DOCKENFIELD ROAD BUCKS HORN OAK GU10 4LP Contents: 1. Introduction 2. Location 3. The Site 4. Planning History 5. The Proposal & Design 6. Energy 7. Environment 8. Access 9. Occupancy and Movement 1. Introduction: This Design, Access, Energy & Environmental statement is in support of a planning application on behalf of Martin Cashmore Property Limited and relating to Unit 2, Halfway Farm, Dockenfield Road, Bucks Horn Oak, Near Farnham, Surrey The application seeks full planning permission to demolish an outdated brick built car maintenance/MOT unit with asbestos roof and to replace it with a purpose-built workshop with associated offices, rest rooms and storage areas. This new building will be split into two units of equal size. One of the new units will be used for a continuation of motor trade use but to a much lesser extent and the other unit will be used for an extension of Martin Cashmore Fencing, already operating from the site. DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT : UNIT 2 REPLACEMENT HALFWAY FARM, DOCKENFIELD RD. BUCKS HORN OAK, 1 GU10 4LP 2. Location: The small village of Bucks Horn Oak lies 6km directly to the south of the Surrey town of Farnham, close to the Surrey/Hampshire border. The market town of Alton in Hampshire is 6km to the west. Bucks Horn Oak is on the A325 Farnham to Bordon road that links with the A31 to the north and the A3 to the south. Bentley railway station on the Waterloo line is a short walk away. Bucks Horn Oak has a community of approximately 115 houses and a number of commercial operations including this application site. -
Introduction from Whitehill Town Council
Whitehill Town Council and Whitehill & Bordon Regeneration Company Wednesday 23rd September 2020 Pre-recorded interview with community questions www.whitehilltowncouncil.gov.uk Cllr Andy Tree, Leader of Whitehill Town Council (left) interviews James Child, Project Lead, Whitehill & Bordon Regeneration Company. Introduction from Whitehill Town Council Dear residents, Following the local election in May 2019, we committed to improving communication between those in power and residents. We have hosted ‘public interest’ meetings with the Whitehill & Bordon Regeneration Company, NHS CCG and Police. Sadly, Covid restrictions mean we currently cannot hold such meetings, but this does not stop us asking questions and seeking answers. Thank you to everyone who sent in questions over email or through Facebook. We did not guarantee that every individual question would be answered but I asked the regeneration company to answer them all, with the answers given in this document and reference to the full list questions asked as Appendix A at the end of this document. As your most local ‘grassroots’ council covering Whitehill & Bordon, we do not control the development but we can fight to ensure your voice is heard. Cllr Andy Tree Leader of Whitehill Town Council 1 Update from Whitehilll & Bordon Regeneration Company (WBRC) on questions raised at Town Council-hosted ‘Public Interest’ Question & Answers (Q&A) meeting with WBRC held on 6th Feb 2020 This section highlights issues which remain unresolved since the quarterly meeting in February. Please read the responses below together with the Q&A from the meeting. It is a record of progress over the past 8 months. We have delivered in this timescale the following: • Café Hogmoor, Beehive education facility and toilets, • SANG car park • Reopened BOSC Pavilion and resumed cricket after lockdown.