DOCSLIB.ORG

Martu Aboriginal People's Uses and Knowledge of Their

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Martu Aboriginal People's Uses and Knowledge of Their To hunt and to hold: Martu Aboriginal people’s uses and knowledge of their country, with implications for co-management in Karlamilyi (Rudall River) National Park and the Great Sandy Desert, Western Australia Fiona J. Walsh, B.Sc. (Zoology), M.Sc. Prelim. (Botany) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The University of Western Australia School of Social and Cultural Studies (Anthropology) and School of Plant Biology (Ecology) 2008 i Photo i (title page) Rita Milangka displays Lil-lilpa (Fimbristylis eremophila), the UWA Department of Botany field research vehicle is in background. This sedge has numerous small seeds that were ground into an edible paste. Whilst Martu did not consume sedge and grass seeds in contemporary times, their use was demonstrated to younger people and visitors. ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my parents, Dianne and John Walsh. My mother cultivated my joy in plants and wildlife. She introduced me to my first bush foods (including kurarra, kogla, ‘honeysuckle’, bardi grubs) on Murchison lands inhabited by Yamatji people then my European pastoralist forbearers.1 My father shares bush skills, a love of learning and long stories. He provided his Toyota vehicle and field support to me on Martu country in 1988. The dedication is also to Martu yakurti (mothers) and mama (fathers) who returned to custodial lands to make safe homes for children and their grandparents and to hold their country for those past and future generations. Photo ii John, Dianne and Melissa Walsh (right to left) net for Gilgie (Freshwater crayfish) on Murrum in the Murchison. 1 Kurarra ~ Acacia tetragonophylla, Deadfinish with edible seeds; Kogla ~ Leichardtia australis, Silky pear with edible fruit, ‘honey suckle’ ~ Eremophila spp. with nectar; bardi grubs ~ edible moth and beetle larvae iii iv ABSTRACT This ethnoecological study examines land uses by modern Martu Aboriginal people on their country. They occupy very remote settlements—Parnngurr, Punmu and Kunawarritji—in the Great and Little Sandy Deserts. In 1990, their country included Crown Lands and Rudall River National Park. The study investigated the proposition that the knowledge and practices of Martu were of direct relevance to ecosystem processes and national park management. This research commenced in the wider Australian research context of the late 1980s – early 90s when prevailing questions were about the role of customary harvest within contemporary Aboriginal society (Altman 1987; Devitt 1988) and the sustainability of species-specific harvests by Australian indigenous people (Bomford & Caughley 1996). Separately, there was a national line of enquiry into Aboriginal roles in natural resource and protected area management (Williams & Hunn 1986; Birckhead et al. 1992). The field work underpinning this study was done in 1986–1988 and quantitative data collected in 1990 whilst the researcher lived on Martu settlements. Ethnographic information was gathered from informal discussions, semi-structured interviews and participant observation on trips undertaken by Martu. A variety of parameters was recorded for each trip in 1990. On trips accompanied by the researcher, details on the plant and animal species collected were quantified. Martu knowledge and observations of Martu behaviour are interpreted in terms of the variety of land uses conducted and transport strategies including vehicle use; the significance of different species collected; socio-economic features of bush food collection; spatio-temporal patterns of foraging; and, the ‘management’ of species and lands by Martu. The research found that in 1990, hunting and gathering were major activities within the suite of land uses practiced by Martu. At least 40% of trips from the settlements were principally to hunt. More than 43 animal species and 37 plant food species were reported to be collected during the study; additionally, species were gathered for firewood, medicines and timber artefacts. Customary harvesting persisted because of the need for sustenance, particularly when there were low store supplies, as well as other reasons. The weight of bush meats hunted at least equalled and, occasionally, was three times greater than the weights of store meats available to Parnngurr residents. Resources were procured from an area generally within 50 km of the settlements. High flexibility and opportunism characterised resource and land use patterns by Martu, these strategies are interpreted to be responsive to the extreme spatial and temporal variability of their desert environment. ‘Management-type’ concepts expressed by Martu were investigated. The study found one central concept associated with ‘holding and being held by’ (kanyirninpa) wherein Martu action was believed to be integral to ecological production. Whilst the study commenced with attention to species-specific sustainability of harvesting, it concluded that ecological sustainability must be viewed at organisational scales ranging from v localised species populations to wider ecosystem processes. Martu identified declines in the production of their lands but attributed this to factors other than hunting. Martu burn regimes and feral animal hunting ameliorated strong evidence for species declines due to over-harvest. The study speculated that Martu practices had differential effects with some of these slowing, if not stalling, declining biodiversity condition trends. From 1990 to 2007, there was continuity of some Martu practices and major changes on their lands. Changes included land use intensification by non-Aboriginal people, attempts by Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) to engage in joint management and increased urbanisation of Martu. Extreme trauma was experienced in Martu communities with escalating sickness and death rates. These changes put great pressure upon Martu individuals and their employees which constrained co- management opportunities. The importance of Aboriginal customary harvest and associated activities remains poorly recognised in wider Australia (Altman 2004). This dissertation concludes that Martu knowledge and practice was not just relevant but integral to the management of Karlamilyi (Rudall River) National Park. However, profound differences between the objectives and procedures of Martu and DEC existed. But there were mutual interests including the land area, indigenous ecological knowledge, wildlife survey and burning regimes. Paradoxically, hunting was a subject of significant difference despite it being the principal activity driving Martu expertise and practice. There is potential for co- management in the National Park but it remains contingent on many factors between both Martu and DEC as well as external to them. The dissertation suggests practical strategies to enhance co-management. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication ...................................................................................................................iii Abstract ........................................................................................................................v Table of contents.........................................................................................................vii List of tables ...............................................................................................................xv List of figures ............................................................................................................xix Acknowledgements..................................................................................................xxiii Statement of Candidate Contribution......................................................................... xxv Copyright.................................................................................................................. xxv 1 Introduction and relevant literature.............................................................................1 1.1 Main thesis and questions.................................................................................... 1 1.2 Chronology of field research and writing............................................................. 4 1.3 A prologue: Three important events prior to 1990 that shaped the field research..................................................................................................................... 5 1.3.1 ‘We are not pujiman any more’.....................................................................5 1.3.2 The demand for Martu recognition and land tenure inside a national park amongst active mineral exploration leases .....................................................6 1.3.3 The Traditional Ecological Knowledge workshop.........................................7 1.4 Different perspectives on ‘indigenous’ land and wildlife management................. 8 1.5 Major themes in literature on Aboriginal land management............................... 11 1.6 Literature on indigenous ecological knowledge systems in Australia................. 15 1.7 Literature on customary harvest and land management practices by post-contact Aboriginal people in remote areas ....................................................... 18 1.8 Literature on the ecological sustainability of indigenous resource and land use................................................................................................................... 27 1.9 Literature on indigenous roles in protected area management ............................ 29 1.10 Dissertation structure......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report
    Geography Monograph Series No. 13 Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. Brisbane, 2009 The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. is a non-profit organization that promotes the study of Geography within educational, scientific, professional, commercial and broader general communities. Since its establishment in 1885, the Society has taken the lead in geo- graphical education, exploration and research in Queensland. Published by: The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. 237 Milton Road, Milton QLD 4064, Australia Phone: (07) 3368 2066; Fax: (07) 33671011 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rgsq.org.au ISBN 978 0 949286 16 8 ISSN 1037 7158 © 2009 Desktop Publishing: Kevin Long, Page People Pty Ltd (www.pagepeople.com.au) Printing: Snap Printing Milton (www.milton.snapprinting.com.au) Cover: Pemberton Design (www.pembertondesign.com.au) Cover photo: Cravens Peak. Photographer: Nick Rains 2007 State map and Topographic Map provided by: Richard MacNeill, Spatial Information Coordinator, Bush Heritage Australia (www.bushheritage.org.au) Other Titles in the Geography Monograph Series: No 1. Technology Education and Geography in Australia Higher Education No 2. Geography in Society: a Case for Geography in Australian Society No 3. Cape York Peninsula Scientific Study Report No 4. Musselbrook Reserve Scientific Study Report No 5. A Continent for a Nation; and, Dividing Societies No 6. Herald Cays Scientific Study Report No 7. Braving the Bull of Heaven; and, Societal Benefits from Seasonal Climate Forecasting No 8. Antarctica: a Conducted Tour from Ancient to Modern; and, Undara: the Longest Known Young Lava Flow No 9. White Mountains Scientific Study Report No 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Extract from the National Native Title Register
    Extract from the National Native Title Register Determination Information: Determination Reference: Federal Court Number(s): WAD6110/1998 WAD77/2006 WAD141/2010 NNTT Number: WCD2013/002 Determination Name: Martu (Part B), Karnapyrri, and Martu #2 Date(s) of Effect: 16/05/2013 Determination Outcome: Native title exists in the entire determination area Register Extract (pursuant to s. 193 of the Native Title Act 1993) Determination Date: 16/05/2013 Determining Body: Federal Court of Australia ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Not Applicable REGISTERED NATIVE TITLE BODY CORPORATE: Western Desert Lands Aboriginal Corporation (Jamukurnu- Yapalikunu) RNTBC Trustee Body Corporate PO Box 331 WEST PERTH Western Australia 6872 Note: current contact details for the Registered Native Title Body Corporate are available from the Office of the Registrar of Indigenous Corporations www.oric.gov.au COMMON LAW HOLDER(S) OF NATIVE TITLE: SCHEDULE FOUR - NATIVE TITLE HOLDERS Part One 1. In respect of the whole of the Determination Area, except for the parts described in Part Two below, the persons referred to in paragraph 2(a) are those people known as the Martu People. The Martu People are those Aboriginal people who hold in common the body of traditional law and culture governing the Determination Area and who identify as Martu and who, in accordance with their traditional laws and customs, identify themselves as being members of one, some or all of the following language groups: National Native Title Tribunal Page 1 of 9 Extract from the National Native Title Register WCD2013/002 (a) Manyjilyjarra; (b) Kartujarra; (c) Kiyajarra; (d) Putijarra; (e) Nyiyaparli; (f) Warnman; (g) Ngulipartu; (h) Pitjikala; (i) Karajarra; (j) Jiwaliny; (k) Mangala; and (l) Nangajarra.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] O
    51 Lawson Crescent Acton Peninsula, Acton ACT 2601 GPO Box 553, Canberra ACT 2601 ABN 62 020 533 641 www.aiatsis.gov.au Environment and Communications References Committee The Senate Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Via email: [email protected] o·ear Committee Members Senate Inquiry into Australia's faunal extinction crisis AIATSIS Submission The Australian Institute for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) welcomes the opportunity to make a submission in support of the Senate Inquiry into Australia's faunal extinction crisis. AIATSIS would recommend the focus of this senate inquiry includes: consultation with traditional owner groups; native title corporations administering native title settlements and agreements bodies; Native Title Representative Bodies (NTRBs); Native Title Service Providers (NTSPs) and Aboriginal Land Councils: all of whom exercise responsibility for the management of the Indigenous Estate and large tracts of the National Reserve System. This critical consultation and engagement is to ensure that traditional knowledge and management is acknowledged as being an essential element in threatened species recovery, management and conservation. AIATSIS submits that acknowledging the totality of the Indigenous Estate and its interconnection with the National Reserve System is essential in terms of addressing the faunal extinction crisis across the content. Caring for Country programs, Indigenous Land and Sea Management Programs (ILSMPs) and Indigenous Protected Areas (IPAs) are achieving great success in terms of threatened species recovery and the eradication of feral pests and species. Please find attached the AIATSIS submission which is based upon 26 years of research and practice by AIATSIS in Indigenous cultural heritage and native title law.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovate Reconciliation Action Plan JULY 2018 – JULY 2020
    Innovate Reconciliation Action Plan JULY 2018 – JULY 2020 Report We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of Country throughout Australia and their continuing connection to land, sea and community. We acknowledge that our Jolimont office is situated on Whadjuk Noongar Boodja. We pay our respect to Whadjuk Noongar people and culture, and to all Elders, past, present and emerging. ADVICE: This document may contain images of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples who have passed away. 3 “We are profoundly thankful to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples for naming, caring for and being custodians of the landscapes, language, culture and law in Introduction this country. This rich heritage enriches and Walking forward together is core to our Creating enlivens our collective lives, communities, 1 Communities philosophy. We engage people and organisations, environments and economies.” organisations to find common ground and build social value. We believe that learning more about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, language, Our Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP) is central to this work. culture and land is not an obligation, but It reflects our deeply held belief in equality and social equity; an ongoing journey which we are privileged mapping the pathways through which we seek to achieve to be walking. Through deep engagement with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander this with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. communities, the quality of our work is better, our engagement is more meaningful and our team
    [Show full text]
  • Western Australian Cultural Infrastructure Framework 2030+
    Western Australian Cultural Infrastructure Framework 2030+ Making space for culture and creativity in WA— places, people and programs Nelson Coppin Virtual Reality painting, Future Dreaming: A Virtual Reality Documentary. Roebourne Amphitheatre, Roebourne Cultural Complex, Ngarluma Yindjibarndi Foundation Ltd. Photo by Sutu. WA Cultural Infrastructure Framework 2030+ Copyright Disclaimer This document contains information, opinions, Whilst the information contained in this document data, and images (“the material”) prepared by has been formulated with all due care, the DLGSC the Department of Local Government, Sport and does not accept any liability to any person for the Cultural industries (DLGSC). The material is subject information (or the use of such information) which is to copyright under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), provided in this document or incorporated into it by and it is owned by the State of Western Australia reference. through the DLGSC. The information contained herein is provided on DLGSC encourages the availability, dissemination the basis that all persons accessing the document and exchange of public information. Should you undertake responsibility for assessing the relevance wish to deal with the material for any purpose, and accuracy of its content. you must obtain permission from DLGSC. Any permission is granted on the condition that About DLGSC you include the copyright notice “© State of Western Australia through Department of Local The DLGSC works with partners across Government, Sport and Cultural Industries” on government and within its diverse sectors to enliven all uses. the Western Australian community and economy through support for and provision of sporting, To obtain such permission, please contact the recreational, cultural and artistic policy, programs Corporate Communications team at: and activities for locals and visitors to the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Austin Land System Unit Landform Soil Vegetation Area (%) 1
    Pages 186-237 2/12/08 11:26 AM Page 195 Austin land system Unit Landform Soil Vegetation area (%) 1. 5% Low ridges and rises – low ridges of Shallow red earths and Scattered (10-20% PFC) shrublands outcropping granite, quartz or greenstone shallow duplex soils on or woodlands usually dominated by and low rises, up to 800 m long and granite or greenstone Acacia aneura (mulga) (SIMS). 2-25 m high, and short footslopes with (4b, 5c, 7a, 7b). abundant mantles of cobbles and pebbles. 2. 80% Saline stony plains – gently undulating Shallow duplex soils on Very scattered to scattered (2.5- plains extending up to 3 km, commonly greenstone (7b). 20% PFC) Maireana spp. low with mantles of abundant to very abundant shrublands (SBMS), Maireana quartz or ironstone pebbles. species include M. pyramidata (sago bush), M. glomerifolia (ball- leaf bluebush), M. georgei (George’s bluebush) and M. triptera (three- winged bluebush). 3. 10% Stony plains – gently undulating plains Shallow red earths on Very scattered to scattered (2.5- within or above unit 2; quartz and granite granite (5c). 20% PFC) low shrublands (SGRS). pebble mantles and occasional granite outcrop. 4. <1% Drainage foci – small discrete Red clays of variable depth Moderately close to close (20-50% (10-50 m in diameter) depositional zones, on hardpan or parent rock PFC) acacia woodland or tall occurring sparsely within units 2 and 5. (9a, 9b). shrubland; dominant species are A. aneura and A. tetragonophylla (curara) (GRMU). 5. 5% Drainage lines – very gently inclined Deep red earths (6a). Very scattered (2.5-10% PFC) A linear drainage tracts, mostly unchannelled aneura low woodland or tall but occasionally incised with rills, gutters shrubland (HPMS) or scattered and shallow gullies; variable mantles of Maireana spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilbara 1 (PIL1 – Chichester Subregion)
    Pilbara 1 Pilbara 1 (PIL1 – Chichester subregion) PETER KENDRICK AND NORM MCKENZIE AUGUST 2001 Subregional description and biodiversity arnhemensis and other Critical Weight Range mammals, arid zone populations of Ghost Bat (Macroderma gigas), values Northwestern Long-eared Bat (Nyctophilus bifax daedalus) and Little Northwestern Free-tailed Bat Description and area (Mormopterus loriae cobourgensis) are also significant in the subregion. The Chichester subregion (PIL 1) comprises the northern section of the Pilbara Craton. Undulating Rare Flora: Archaean granite and basalt plains include significant Species of subregional significance include Livistona areas of basaltic ranges. Plains support a shrub steppe alfredii populations in the Chichester escarpment characterised by Acacia inaequilatera over Triodia (Sherlock River drainage). wiseana (formerly Triodia pungens) hummock grasslands, while Eucalyptus leucophloia tree steppes occur on ranges. Centres of endemism: The climate is Semi-desert-tropical and receives 300mm Bioregional endemics include Ningaui timealeyi, an of rainfall annually. Drainage occurs to the north via undescribed Planigale, Dasykaluta rosamondae, numerous rivers (e.g. De Grey, Oakover, Nullagine, Pseudomys chapmani, Pseudantechinus roryi, Diplodactylus Shaw, Yule, Sherlock). Subregional area is 9,044,560ha. savagei, Diplodactylus wombeyi, Delma elegans, Delma pax, Ctenotus rubicundus, Ctenotus affin. robustus, Egernia pilbarensis, Lerista zietzi, Lerista flammicauda, Dominant land use Lerista neander, two or three undescribed taxa within Lerista muelleri, Notoscincus butleri, Varanus pilbarensis, Grazing – native pastures (see Appendix B, key b), Acanthophis wellsi, Demansia rufescens, Ramphotyphlops Aboriginal lands and Reserves, UCL & Crown Reserves, pilbarensis, and Ramphotyphlops ganei. Conservation, and Mining leases. Refugia: Continental Stress Class There are no known true Refugia in PIL1, however it is possible that calcrete aquifers in the upper Oakover Continental Stress Class for PIL1 is 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Clearing Permit Decision Report
    Clearing Permit Decision Report 1. Application details 1.1. Permit application details Permit application No.: 8399/1 Permit type: Purpose Permit 1.2. Proponent details Proponent’s name: EII Gas Transmission Service WA (Operations) Pty Ltd 1.3. Property details Property: Pipeline Licence PL60 Pipeline Licence PL63 Local Government Area: Shire of East Pilbara Town of Port Hedland Colloquial name: Telfer Gas Pipeline 1.4. Application Clearing Area (ha) No. Trees Method of Clearing For the purpose of: 265.449 Mechanical Removal Gas Pipeline Maintenance 1.5. Decision on application Decision on Permit Application: Grant Decision Date: 12 September 2019 2. Site Information 2.1. Existing environment and information 2.1.1. Description of the native vegetation under application Vegetation Description The vegetation of the application area is broadly mapped as the following Beard vegetation associations: 41: Shrublands; teatree scrub; 93: Hummock grasslands, shrub steppe; kanji over soft spinifex; 101: Hummock grasslands, shrub steppe; Acacia pachycarpa over soft spinifex; 117: Hummock grasslands, grass steppe; soft spinifex; 134: Mosaic: Hummock grasslands, open low tree steppe; desert bloodwood and feathertop spinifex on sandhills / Hummock grasslands, shrub steppe; mixed shrubs over spinifex between sandhills; 157: Hummock grasslands, grass steppe; hard spinifex, Triodia wiseana ; 171: Hummock grasslands, low tree steppe; snappy gum over soft spinifex and Triodia brizioides ; 173: Hummock grasslands, shrub steppe; kanji over soft spinifex and Triodia wiseana on basalt; 589: Mosaic: Short bunch grassland - savanna / grass plain (Pilbara) / Hummock grasslands, grass steppe; soft spinifex; 619: Medium woodland; river gum ( Eucalyptus camaldulensis ); and 647: Hummock grasslands, dwarf-shrub steppe; Acacia translucens over soft spinifex (GIS Database).
    [Show full text]
  • Martu Paint Country
    MARTU PAINT COUNTRY THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF COLOUR AND AESTHETICS IN WESTERN DESERT ROCK ART AND CONTEMPORARY ACRYLIC ART Samantha Higgs June 2016 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University Copyright by Samantha Higgs 2016 All Rights Reserved Martu Paint Country This PhD research was funded as part of an Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage Project, the Canning Stock Route (Rock art and Jukurrpa) Project, which involved the ARC, the Australian National University (ANU), the Western Australian (WA) Department of Indigenous Affairs (DIA), the Department of Environment and Climate Change WA (DEC), The Federal Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA, now the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Population and Communities) the Kimberley Land Council (KLC), Landgate WA, the Central Desert Native Title Service (CDNTS) and Jo McDonald Cultural Heritage Management Pty Ltd (JMcD CHM). Principal researchers on the project were Dr Jo McDonald and Dr Peter Veth. The rock art used in this study was recorded by a team of people as part of the Canning Stock Route project field trips in 2008, 2009 and 2010. The rock art recording team was led by Jo McDonald and her categories for recording were used. I certify that this thesis is my own original work. Samantha Higgs Image on title page from a painting by Mulyatingki Marney, Martumili Artists. Martu Paint Country Acknowledgements Thank you to the artists and staff at Martumili Artists for their amazing generosity and patience.
    [Show full text]
  • Floral Glands in Asclepiads: Structure, Diversity and Evolution
    Acta Botanica Brasilica - 31(3): 477-502. July-September 2017. doi: 10.1590/0102-33062016abb0432 Review Floral glands in asclepiads: structure, diversity and evolution Diego Demarco1 Received: December 7, 2016 Accepted: February 24, 2017 . ABSTRACT Species of Apocynaceae stand out among angiosperms in having very complex fl owers, especially those of asclepiads, which belong to the most derived subfamily (Asclepiadoideae). Th ese fl owers are known to represent the highest degree of fl oral synorganization of the eudicots, and are comparable only to orchids. Th is morphological complexity may also be understood by observing their glands. Asclepiads have several protective and nuptial secretory structures. Th eir highly specifi c and specialized pollination systems are associated with the great diversity of glands found in their fl owers. Th is review gathers data regarding all types of fl oral glands described for asclepiads and adds three new types (glandular trichome, secretory idioblast and obturator), for a total of 13 types of glands. Some of the species reported here may have dozens of glands of up to 11 types on a single fl ower, corresponding to the largest diversity of glands recorded to date for a single structure. Keywords: anatomy, Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae, diversity, evolution, fl ower, secretory structures considering its most derived subfamily Asclepiadoideae. Introduction Th e close relationship between the former families Apocynaceae and Asclepiadaceae has always been recognized Apocynaceae is an extremely diverse family in since its establishment as “Apocineae” by Jussieu (1789). morphological terms, represented by trees, shrubs, herbs and climbers, with single leaves usually opposite, rarely Although Brown (1810) divided it into two families and alternate or whorled, with stipules modifi ed in colleters in this separation had been maintained in the subsequent several species (Endress & Bruyns 2000; Capelli et al.
    [Show full text]
  • WA Health Language Services Policy
    WA Health Language Services Policy September 2011 Cultural Diversity Unit Public Health Division WA Health Language Services Policy Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1. Context .................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Government policy obligations ................................................................................................... 2 2. Policy goals and aims .................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Scope......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 4. Guiding principles ............................................................................................................................................. 6 5. Definitions ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 6. Provision of interpreting and translating services ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Waruku Ngurra, Waruku Kuwiyi Martu People, HunNg and fire in the Western Desert
    waruku ngurra, waruku kuwiyi Martu people, hun3ng and fire in the western desert Rebecca Bliege Bird, Nyalangka Taylor, Douglas W. Bird, Cur:s Taylor, Brian F. Codding, Fiona Walsh © 2014 Martu Ecological Anthropology Project Citation: Bliege Bird, Rebecca., Nyanlangka Taylor, Douglas W. Bird, Brian F. Codding, Curtis Taylor, and Fiona Walsh (2014) Waruku ngurra, waruku kuwiyi: Martu people, hunting, and fire in the Western Desert, 2000-2010. Unpublished resource. Rebecca Bliege Bird and Douglas W. Bird, Stanford University, USA Jurtujarra (sisters-in-law) hunting near Punmu head down a dune to continue hunting in a Nyalangka Taylor and Curtis Taylor, Parnngurr Aboriginal Community, Aus- burn lit earlier in the day, July 2007. tralia Brian F. Codding, University of Utah, USA Warning: This booklet may contain images and ref- Fiona Walsh, CSIRO, Alice Springs, Australia erences to some people that are deceased. There may also be yumari on these pages. Please be sen- Cover photo: Nyalangka Taylor lights a fire line in preparation to hunt for sitive to those kin that may feel kurnta in seeing or sand goanna near Parnngurr in July, 2005. hearing about these individuals. i PREFACE A hunting fire is lit to clear off a patch of old growth spinifex grass, near Parnngurr Aborigi- nal Community, July 2010. This is the story of the research we have been doing since 2000 So many families helped to put this research together, that we can- when we first started working with Martu, the Traditional Owners of a not name them all here. Parnngurr, Punmu, Kunawarritji families, this large region of Australia’s Western Desert.
    [Show full text]