News Letter Labor Organiations As Well As Other Groups Which Utilize Group Legal Services, Has Been Published in the May-June Issue of the Journal C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

News Letter Labor Organiations As Well As Other Groups Which Utilize Group Legal Services, Has Been Published in the May-June Issue of the Journal C ;s:s,IT'- AL,, .AINT '3C.'.: Li .,,Ai;R Group Legal Services i.^ Vol.-INo.25 Under Study N eemci July 17, 1959 A report of the Committee on Group Legal Services of the State Bar, containing recommendations which may be of importance to News Letter labor organiations as well as other groups which utilize group legal services, has been published in the May-June issue of the Journal C. J. HAGGERTY Published by California Lor Federation, AFL-CIO of the State Bar of California. Executive The report is called to the atten- Secretary-T"aurer I tion of affiliates by C. J. Haggerty, secretary-treasurer of the California Labor Federation, because of its re- ferral to a subcommittee of the Haggerty Warns Congress of Three-Pronged State Board of the Bar Association for study and report at its August, Attack on Watr Monopoly Protections 1959 meeting. Some affiliates may C. J. Haggerty, secretary-treasurer of the California Labor Federation, wish to make appropriate represen- AFL-CIO, this Tuesday warned Congress of a "three-pronged attack in tation to the State Board at this Sacramento and Washington to thwart the aims of federal water policy and August meeting. allow future irrigation projeets in California to fall under the control of a Haggerty noted that the report few corporate absentee owners who hold huge tracts of land in the San of the Committee on Group Legal Joaquin Valley." Services discusses in detail the re- The state AFL-CIO leader, fight- used for water deliveries by the lationship between attorneys and ing to mobilize liberal forces in the "state" without the application of labor organizations and their mem- field of basic resources develop- federal anti-speculation, anti-mo- bers. Some of the recommendations, ment, issued the warning to each nopoly controls. if adopted, will have the effect of member of the California delega- (2) The irrigation repayment con- changing historic relationships in- tion in the House of Representatives tract which Secretary of the In sofar as some labor organizations in a hard-hitting, straightforward terior Fred Seaton has recently of- are concerned. statement on vital water issues be- fered districts in the service area of Those unions using group legal fore the Congress affecting the Pine Flat Dam to escape reclama- services may obtain a copy of the future development and prosperity tion law protections for taxpayers. May-June 1959 issue of the Journal of California. (3) Water legislation passed by of the State Bar from the State Bar The three-pronged attack, Hag- the California state legislature pro- headquarters, 2100 Central Tower, gerty said, is manifested in the fol- posing a $1.75 billion water bond San Francisco. lowing: program without any anti-enrich- (1) The San Luis Project Authori- ment protections for landed monop- zation bill, H.R. 7155, scheduled to olists in the San Joaquin Valley, Urge Affiliates Support Effort reach the floor of the House of Rep- who stand to be unjustly enriched resentatives in the near future, by millions and millions of dollars. To Reduce Traffic Deaths which provides for joint federal- Although the three drives are Support by California labor or- state development in a scheme not necessarily coordinated, Hag- ganizations of the national drive to whereby federal faculties would be (Continued on Page 2) reduce traffic deaths on highway during this year's Labor Day cele- bration is urged by the California California Consumer Association Launching Steps Taken Labor Federation, AFL-CIO. Formal steps to launch a California Consumers Association, dedicated Cooperation with the Labor Divi- to promoting the Interest of the public as consumers, were taken last Satur- sion of the National Safety Council day in San Francisco, following a one-day conference on consumer problems. in this safety drive was voted at the Upon adjournment of the conference, presented by the University of May meeting of the national AFL- California's Institute of Industrial Relations in cooperation with coop, and CIO Executive Council. other consumer and labor groups, in- The AFL-CIO Standing Commit- cluding the California Labor Fed- a provisional constitution and state- tee on Safety and Occupational eration, interested participants in ment of principles and objectives of Health, designated by the Executive the one-day meet constituted them- the Association as working papers Council to implement this decision, selves as a sponsoring committee for the development of final docu- will coordinate its implementing ac- for the purpose of establishing the ments to be presented at a founding tions through state labor organiza- Associaton. convention to be convened at a fu- tions. Close to 100 individuals from var- ture date. In due course, safety materials ious consumer interests, includiDgPoctor Peter Odegard, University will be available through the Fed- organized labor, a t t e n d e d the of California professor, was unanim- eration's offices in San Francisco, launching session, which was. held ously elected temporary president, for use of.al affiliates in publicizing in the Georgian Room of ,the Whut- and John Huthinson, of the Uni- the safety campaign. The Labor Di- comb Hotel. versity's Industrial Relations Insti- (Contkoued on Page 4) The self-constituted body adopted (Continued on Page 2) Haggerty Warns Congress of ThreePronged Attack on Water Monopoly Protections (Continued from Page 1) Although thesestate deliveries ger staged a five-hour debate to up- gerty pointed out, each of them utilize federal facilities, supporters hold the principles of reclamation "would serve the same end-mo- of the bill in its present form have law. nopolization of irrigation water insisted upon exemptions from fed- Emphasizing that none of the furnished by public monies." eral reclamation law. language to. which the. state AFL- It has been stated that, in terms In his statement-this week, Hag- CIO has.objected is necessary in the of dollars and cents, the monopoly gerty called the attention of Cali- bill before. the House, Haggerty threat posed would permit a give- fornia Congressmen to a previous argued that "the legal framework away bigger by far than the measly statement sent by the state AFL- for cooperative state-federal. proj- $100 million nearly pulled off in CIO to the entire Congress on April ects already exists in federal recla- "Dixon-Yates." 24, 1959, outlining amendments mation law ... and the inclusion of SAN LUIS LEGISLATION necessary to rem o v e loopholes this language can only serve to con- Under the San Luis bill, the fed- which would allow vast enrichment fuse and confound existing law to eral government would be author- of monopoly landholders. the sole advantage of. large land- ized to construct a-federal dam for Since that statement, Haggerty holders, some of whom right now delivery of water to the west side said, the Senate passed S. 44 author- are on the verge of evading the aims of the San Joaquin Valley. So-called izing the San Lu project with one of reclamation law in the Pine Flat joint use provisions of H.R. 7155 pro- of the key exemption amendments service area." vide for the construction of addi- eliminated. Meanwhile, he added, PINE FLAT SERVICE AREA tional state capacity for storage and the House Interior Committee has In relating the San Luis bill to the delivery of water to the south, and cleared H.R. 7155, containing Sec- efforts on Pine Flat Dam to evade to highly concentrated landholdings tion 7, which is the exemption pro- reclamation law, Haggerty said that that adjoin the federal service area vision deleted from the Senate ver- Secretary of Interior Seaton has of- on the west side, and the lower end sion of the San Luis bill when Sen- fered local districts receiving irriga- of the San Joaquin Valley. ators Douglas, Morse and Neuber- tion water from Pine Flat Dam re- payment contracts which would al- low them to sidestep compliance California Consumer Association Launching Steps Taken with the so-called 160-acre limita- tion by prepaying the charges al- (Continued from Page 1) State Attorney General's office, in- located for irrigation. tute and Teacher Union member, cluding creation of a Consumer This offering to exchange "policy temporary secretary-treasurer, to Fraud Division, was reviewed by for cash" by the prepayment doc- proceed, with preparations for the Howard Jewel, assistant attorney trine, was labelled as running con- founding convention. general. trary to strongly expressed legisla- The purpose of the California The noon luncheon session fea- tive intent, and the defeat on two Consumer Association, a completely tured an address on how consumer specific occasions in 1950 and 1951 non-partisan organization, is to pro- laws work by Persia Campbell, form- of legislation designed to permit mote consumer interests through er Consumer Counsel in the state what Seaton is now proposing by the processes of education, repre- of New York, who gave conference administrative fiat. sentation before administrative and participants insight into the type of The pattern of landholdings in legislative bodies, and the provision problems which would likely con- the Pine Flat service area shows of consulting services. It is intended front the new state Consumer Coun- some 52 farmers owning 196,466 also that the mobilization of con- sel, and also what to expect in the acres of excess lands. In the so- sumer interests would be of mater- way of accomplishments. called federal service area of the ial assistance in the development of Governor Edmund G. Brown, who San Luis project, 66 owners hold sound consumer programs and rep- was unable to address the one-day about 70% of the project's 450,000 resentation through the newly- session, sent a statement praising acres.
Recommended publications
  • Senator James A. Cobey Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf287001pw No online items Inventory of the Senator James A. Cobey Papers Processed by The California State Archives staff; supplementary encoding and revision supplied by Brooke Dykman Dockter. California State Archives 1020 "O" Street Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: (916) 653-2246 Fax: (916) 653-7363 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.sos.ca.gov/archives/ © 2000 California Secretary of State. All rights reserved. Inventory of the Senator James A. LP82; LP83; LP84; LP85; LP86; LP87; LP88 1 Cobey Papers Inventory of the Senator James A. Cobey Papers Inventory: LP82; LP83; LP84; LP85; LP86; LP87; LP88 California State Archives Office of the Secretary of State Sacramento, California Contact Information: California State Archives 1020 "O" Street Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: (916) 653-2246 Fax: (916) 653-7363 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.sos.ca.gov/archives/ Processed by: The California State Archives staff © 2000 California Secretary of State. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Senator James A. Cobey Papers Inventory: LP82; LP83; LP84; LP85; LP86; LP87; LP88 Creator: Cobey, James A., Senator Extent: See Arrangement and Description Repository: California State Archives Sacramento, California Language: English. Publication Rights For permission to reproduce or publish, please contact the California State Archives. Permission for reproduction or publication is given on behalf of the California State Archives as the owner of the physical items. The researcher assumes all responsibility for possible infringement which may arise from reproduction or publication of materials from the California State Archives collections. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Senator James A.
    [Show full text]
  • San Luis Unit Project History
    San Luis Unit West San Joaquin Division Central Valley Project Robert Autobee Bureau of Reclamation Table of Contents The San Luis Unit .............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................4 Project Authorization.....................................................7 Construction History .....................................................9 Post Construction History ................................................19 Settlement of the Project .................................................24 Uses of Project Water ...................................................25 1992 Crop Production Report/Westlands ....................................27 Conclusion............................................................28 Suggested Readings ...........................................................28 Index ......................................................................29 1 The West San Joaquin Division The San Luis Unit Approximately 300 miles, and 30 years, separate Shasta Dam in northern California from the San Luis Dam on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley. The Central Valley Project, launched in the 1930s, ascended toward its zenith in the 1960s a few miles outside of the town of Los Banos. There, one of the world's largest dams rose across one of California's smallest creeks. The American mantra of "bigger is better" captured the spirit of the times when the San Luis Unit
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT SUBSIDENCE STUDY San Luis Field Division San Joaquin Field Division
    State of California California Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Division of Engineering CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT SUBSIDENCE STUDY San Luis Field Division San Joaquin Field Division June 2017 State of California California Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Division of Engineering CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT SUBSIDENCE STUDY Jeanne M. Kuttel ......................................................................................... Division Chief Joseph W. Royer .......................... Chief, Geotechnical and Engineering Services Branch Tru Van Nguyen ............................... Supervising Engineer, General Engineering Section G. Robert Barry .................. Supervising Engineering Geologist, Project Geology Section by James Lopes ................................................................................ Senior Engineer, W.R. John M. Curless .................................................................. Senior Engineering Geologist Anna Gutierrez .......................................................................................... Engineer, W.R. Ganesh Pandey .................................................................... Supervising Engineer, W.R. assisted by Bradley von Dessonneck ................................................................ Engineering Geologist Steven Friesen ...................................................................... Engineer, Water Resources Dan Mardock .............................................................................. Chief, Geodetic
    [Show full text]
  • Subcommittee on Water, Power and Oceans John Fleming, Chairman Hearing Memorandum
    Subcommittee on Water, Power and Oceans John Fleming, Chairman Hearing Memorandum May 20, 2016 To: All Subcommittee on Water, Power and Oceans Members From: Majority Committee Staff , Subcommittee on Water, Power and Oceans (x58331) Hearing: Legislative hearing on H.R. 5217, To affirm “The Agreement Between the United States and Westlands Water District” dated September 15, 2015, “The Agreement Between the United States, San Luis Water District, Panoche Water District and Pacheco Water District”, and for other purposes. May 24, 2016 at 10:30 a.m. in 1334 Longworth HOB H.R. 5217 (Rep. Jim Costa, D-CA), “San Luis Drainage Resolution Act” Bill Summary: H.R. 5217 affirms a recent litigation settlement between the federal government and the Westlands Water District in an attempt to bring about final resolution to decades-long litigation over the federal government’s responsibility to provide drainage for certain lands in Central California. The bill is very similar to H.R. 4366 (Rep. Valadao, R-CA), but adds facets of an agreement between the federal government and three additional water districts. This one-panel hearing will also include consideration of two other legislative proposals. Invited Witnesses (in alphabetical order): Mr. John Bezdek Senior Advisor to the Deputy Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. Mr. Tom Birmingham General Manager Westlands Water District Fresno, California Mr. Jerry Brown General Manager Contra Costa Water District Concord, California Mr. Steve Ellis Vice-President Taxpayers for Common Sense Washington, D.C. Mr. Dennis Falaschi General Manager, Panoche Water District Firebaugh, California Background: History of the San Luis Unit Public Law 86-488 authorized the San Luis Unit as part of the Central Valley Project on June 3, 1960.1 The principal purpose of the San Luis Unit, located in California’s San Joaquin Valley, is irrigation water supply for almost one million acres of farmland.
    [Show full text]
  • RK Ranch 5732 +/- Acres Los Banos, CA Merced County
    FARMS | RANCHES | RECREATIONAL PROPERTIES | LAND | LUXURY ESTATES RK Ranch 5732 +/- acres Los Banos, CA Merced County 707 Merchant Street | Suite 100 | Vacaville, CA 95688 707-455-4444 Office | 707-455-0455 Fax | californiaoutdoorproperties.com CalBRE# 01838294 FARMS | RANCHES | RECREATIONAL PROPERTIES | LAND | LUXURY ESTATES Introduction This expansive 5732 acre ranch is ideal for hunting, fishing, your favorite recreational activities, a family compound, agriculture, or cattle grazing. Located in Merced County, just an hour and a half from the San Francisco Bay Area, infinite recreational opportunities await with elk, trophy black tail deer, pigs, quail, and doves. The angler will be busy with catfish, bluegill, and outstanding bass fish- ing from the stock ponds. The South Fork of the Los Banos Creek flows through the property. This property is currently leased for cattle, but the recreational uses are only limited by your imagination. Location The property is located in Merced County, 17 miles from the town of Los Banos, 26 miles from Merced, and 8 miles from the San Luis Reservior. With all the benefits of seclusion, and the conveniences of major metropolitan areas close by, this property is just a 1.5 hour drive to Silicon Valley. Air service is provided by Fresno-Yosemite International Airport, 78 miles from the property, or Norman Y. Mi- neta San Jose International Airport, 83 miles from the property. Los Banos Municipal Airport is lo- cated 17 miles away. The closest schools would be 17 miles away in Los Banos. From the north, take Highway 101 South to CA-152 East, right onto Basalt Road, left onto Gonzaga Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Exchange Agreement for Water in San Luis Reservoir and Millerton Lake Between Reclamation and Westlands Water District to Facili
    Draft FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Exchange Agreement for Water in San Luis Reservoir and Millerton Lake between Reclamation and Westlands Water District to Facilitate Water Supply for the Exchange Contractors and Friant Division Contractors FONSI-15-034 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation June 2015 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and manage the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provide scientific and other information about those resources; and honor its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION South-Central California Area Office, Fresno, California FONSI-15-034 Exchange Agreement for Water in San Luis Reservoir and Millerton Lake between Reclamation and Westlands Water District to Facilitate Water Supply for the Exchange Contractors and Friant Division Contractors _____________ Prepared by: Rain L. Emerson Date Supervisory Natural Resources Specialist _____________ Concurred by: Shauna McDonald Date Wildlife Biologist _____________ Approved by: Michael Jackson, P.E. Date Area Manager FONSI-15-034 Introduction In accordance with section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, the South-Central California Area Office of the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), has determined that an environmental impact statement is not required for the facilitation of an exchange of 13,195 acre-feet (AF) between Westlands Water District (Westlands) and the San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors (Exchange Contractors).
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
    PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE SANTA NELLA / VOLTA WATER SUPPLY AND BLENDING PROJECT in the communities of Santa Nella and Volta Merced County, CA February 17, 2017 Prepared for: Santa Nella County Water District 12931 S Hwy 33 Santa Nella, CA 95322 Prepared by: BaseCamp Environmental, Inc. 115 S. School Street, Suite 14 Lodi, CA 95240 209-224-8213 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE SANTA NELLA / VOLTA WATER SUPPLY AND BLENDING PROJECT in the communities of Santa Nella and Volta Merced County, CA February 17, 2017 Prepared for: Santa Nella County Water District 12931 S Hwy 33 Santa Nella, CA 95322 Prepared by: BaseCamp Environmental, Inc. 115 S. School Street, Suite 14 Lodi, CA 95240 209-224-8213 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page NEGATIVE DECLARATION A. General Project Information v B. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected vi C. Lead Agency Determination vi Chapter 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Brief 1-1 1.2 Purpose of Initial Study 1-1 1.3 Project Background 1-2 1.4 Environmental Evaluation Checklist Terminology 1-3 1.5 Summary of Environmental Effects and Mitigation Measures 1-4 Chapter 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Brief 2-1 2.2 Project Location 2-1 2.3 Project Objectives 2-2 2.4 Project Details 2-2 2.5 Permits and Approvals 2-5 Chapter 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION FORM 3.1 Aesthetics 3-1 3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources 3-4 3.3 Air Quality 3-6 3.5 Biological Resources 3-10 3.6 Cultural Resources 3-16 3.7 Geology and Soils 3-21 3.8 Greenhouse Gas
    [Show full text]
  • 4.8 Water Resources
    4.8 WATER RESOURCES INTRODUCTION This section describes the impacts on County water resources associated with development anticipated to occur under the General Plan. This section focuses on how development at the intensities assumed in the General Plan could affect water supply and water quality. Other water-related issues, such as wastewater, storm drainage, and flooding are discussed in Section 4.5, Wastewater, Storm Drainage, and Flooding. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Water Resources Water resources in Fresno County include a number of rivers and streams, artificial waterways, and groundwater. Detailed information about surface water and groundwater resources is contained in Chapter 5.3, Public Facilities and Services, Storm Drainage and Flood Control, Chapter 5.4, Water Supply and Distribution Facilities, Chapter 5.5, Wastewater Collection, Treatment, and Disposal, Chapter 7.2, Natural Resources, Water Resources, and Chapter 7.3, Water Quality Condition in the General Plan Background Report (Background Report). That information is hereby incorporated by reference and is summarized below. Surface Water Resources The San Joaquin River originates in the Sierra Nevada and flows westerly forming the border between Fresno and Madeira Counties downstream from Mammoth Pool Reservoir. The North and Middle Forks originate in Madeira County near Devils Postpile National Monument. The South Fork begins at Martha Lake in northern Kings Canyon National Park within Fresno County. Average annual precipitation in the upper reaches of the river falls mainly in the form of snow and is as high as 70 inches. By comparison, the arid San Joaquin Valley to the west, average annual rainfall is as low as six inches near Mendota.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Draft
    Chapter 11 Geology and Soils This chapter describes the affected environment for geology and soils, as well as potential environmental consequences and associated mitigation measures, as they pertain to implementing the alternatives. This chapter presents information on the primary study area (area of project features, the Temperance Flat Reservoir Area, and Millerton Lake below RM 274). It also discusses the extended study area (San Joaquin River from Friant Dam to the Merced River, the San Joaquin River from the Merced River to the Delta, the Delta, and the CVP and SWP water service areas). Affected Environment This section describes the affected environment related to geology, geologic hazards, erosion and sedimentation, geomorphology, mineral resources, soils, and salts. Where appropriate, geology and soils characteristics are described in a regional context, including geologic provinces, physiographic regions, or other large-scale areas, with some area-specific geologic maps and descriptions of specific soil associations. Geology This section describes the geology of the primary and extended study areas. Primary Study Area A description of the surficial geologic units encountered in the primary study area is presented in Table 11-1. Geologic maps of the primary study area and the area of project features are presented in Figure 11-1 and Figure 11-2, respectively. Draft – August 2014 – 11-1 Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Environmental Impact Statement Table 11-1. Description of Surficial Geologic Units of the Primary Study Area Geologic Map of Millerton Lake Quadrangle, West-Central Sierra Nevada, California1 Formation Surficial Deposits General Features Abbreviation Plutonic rocks characterized by undeformed blocky hornblende prisms as long as 1 cm and by biotite books as Tonalite of Blue Canyon much as 5 mm across.
    [Show full text]
  • B.F. Sisk Dam Raise and Reservoir Expansion Project Final Environmental Impact Report/Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
    B.F. Sisk Dam Raise and Reservoir Expansion Project Environmental Impact Report/ Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement FINAL Estimated Lead Agency Total Costs Associated with Developing and Producing this EIR/SEIS is $1,659,000 December 2020 B.F. Sisk Dam Raise and Reservoir Expansion Project Final Environmental Impact Report/Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Final Estimated Lead Agency Total Costs Associated with Developing and Producing this EIR/SEIS is $1,659,000 December 2020 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to conserve and manage the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage for the benefit and enjoyment of the American people, provide scientific and other information about natural resources and natural hazards to address societal challenges and create opportunities for the American people, and honor the Nation’s trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities to help them prosper. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. The mission of the San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority is to operate the Delta-Mendota Canal and related facilities reliably and cost- effectively, and to support member agencies in restoring and protecting adequate, affordable water supplies for agricultural, municipal and industrial, and environmental uses. B.F. Sisk Dam Raise and
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Study of the Long-Term Operation of the State Water Project
    Initial Study of the Long-Term Operation of the State Water Project State Clearinghouse No. 2019049121 State of California Department of Water Resources November 22, 2019 Initial Study of the Long-Term Operation of the State Water Project State Clearinghouse No. 2019049121 Lead Agency: California Department of Water Resources Contact: Dean Messer, Division of Environmental Services, Regulatory Compliance Branch 916/376-9844 Responsible Agency: California Department of Fish and Wildlife November 22, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1-2 1.2.1 Required Permits and Approvals ......................................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Document Organization ....................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Summary of Findings........................................................................................................ 1-3 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Using Forecasts in Reservoir Operations
    USING FORECASTS IN RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Jenny Fromm, P.E. Lead Water Manager Sacramento District/Water Management Section Pine Flat Dam-Lake (Corps – CA) June 2017 Black Butte Dam – Lake (Corps – CA) Jan 2017 Date: 25 June 2019 Camanche Dam-Lake (EBMUD – CA) Feb 2017 Don Pedro Dam-Lake (TID – CA) Feb 2017 2 AGENDA •USACE Authority •Flood Control Operations •Use of Forecast in Reservoir Operations •Forecast Informed Reservoir Operations (FIRO) •Considerations for FIRO at Other Projects •Questions Folsom Dam – Lake (USBR – CA) – October 2016 Sunrise at Folsom Dam – Lake (USBR – CA) Oct 2017 3 CORPS AUTHORITY FOR MANAGEMENT OF FLOOD CONTROL SPACE Section 7 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (58 Stat. 890, 33 U.S.C. 709) ▪ Prescribe rules and regulations in the interest of flood control ▪ The project owner is responsible for real-time implementation of the water control plan, but the Corps has authority to determine flood releases in the flood control space with input from the owner. 3 4 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS IN CALIFORNIA CORPS (30, 17-SPK, 2-SPN, 11-SPL)* •Corps Owned, Operated, Managed •Flood Control SECTION 7 (19, 16-SPK,1-SPN, 2-SPL)* •Operated by another agency •Flood Control *SPK – Sacramento District SPN – San Francisco District SPL – Los Angeles District Camanche Dam-Lake (EBMUD – CA) Feb 2017 Wanship Dam/Rockport Lake (Utah) Black Butte Dam – Lake (Corps – CA) Jan 2017 Friant Dam – Millerton Lake (USBR – CA) Jul 2017 5 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS Water Control Manual (WCM) (Reservoir Regulation Manual) − Appendix A Standing Operator Instructions − Water Control Diagram − Emergency Release Spillway Diagram* *Only if gated spillway 6 RESERVOIR OPERATING ZONES Top of Dam Surcharge Pool (Dam Safety) Emergency Spillway Release Diagram* Spillway Crest Flood Control (ac-ft) Flood Control Pool Water Conservation Pool Outlet Note: NOT TO SCALE *Only if gated spillway 7 WATER CONTROL DIAGRAM 1.
    [Show full text]