DOCSLIB.ORG

Medrxiv:2020.05.09.20096701

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Medrxiv:2020.05.09.20096701 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.09.20096701; this version posted May 18, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . 8th May 2020 Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team Report 21: Estimating COVID-19 cases and reproduc- tion number in Brazil Thomas A Mellan3∗, Henrique H Hoeltgebaum∗, Swapnil Mishra∗, Charlie Whittaker∗, Ricardo P Schnekenberg∗, Axel Gandy∗, H Juliette T Unwin, Michaela A C Vollmer, Helen Coupland, Iwona Hawryluk, NunoRo- drigues Faria, Juan Vesga, Harrison Zhu, Michael Hutchinson, Oliver Ratmann, Melodie Monod, Kylie Ainslie, Marc Baguelin, Sangeeta Bhatia, Adhiratha Boonyasiri, Nicholas Brazeau, Giovanni Charles, Laura V Cooper, Zulma Cucunuba, Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg, Amy Dighe, Bimandra Djaafara, Jeff Eaton, Sabine L van Elsland, Richard FitzJohn, Keith Fraser, Katy Gaythorpe, Will Green, Sarah Hayes, Natsuko Imai, Ben Jeffrey, Edward Knock, Daniel Laydon, John Lees, Tara Mangal, Andria Mousa, Gemma Nedjati-Gilani, Pierre Nouvellet, Daniela Olivera, Kris V Parag, Michael Pickles, Hayley A Thompson, Robert Verity, Caro- line Walters, Haowei Wang, Yuanrong Wang, Oliver J Watson, Lilith Whittles, Xiaoyue Xi, Lucy Okell, Ilaria Dorigatti, Patrick Walker, Azra Ghani, Steven Riley, Neil M Ferguson1, Christl A. Donnelly, Seth Flaxman∗ and Samir Bhatt2∗ Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Modelling MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analytics Abdul Latif Jameel Institute for Disease and Emergency Analytics, Imperial College London Department of Statistics, University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford ∗Contributed equally. Correspondence: [email protected], [email protected],3 t.mel- [email protected] NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice. DOI: Page 1 of 24 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.09.20096701; this version posted May 18, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . 8th May 2020 Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team 1 Summary Brazil is an epicentre for COVID-19 in Latin America. In this report we describe the Brazilian epidemic using three epidemiological measures: the number of infections, the number of deaths and the repro- duction number. Our modelling framework requires sufficient death data to estimate trends,andwe therefore limit our analysis to 16 states that have experienced a total of more than fifty deaths. The distribution of deaths among states is highly heterogeneous, with 5 states—São Paulo, Rio deJaneiro, Ceará, Pernambuco and Amazonas—accounting for 81% of deaths reported to date. In these states, we estimate that the percentage of people that have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 ranges from 3.3%(95% CI: 2.8%-3.7%) in São Paulo to 10.6% (95% CI: 8.8%-12.1%) in Amazonas. The reproduction number (a measure of transmission intensity) at the start of the epidemic meant that an infected individual would infect three or four others on average. Following non-pharmaceutical interventions such as school clo- sures and decreases in population mobility, we show that the reproduction number has dropped sub- stantially in each state. However, for all 16 states we study, we estimate with high confidence thatthe reproduction number remains above 1. A reproduction number above 1 means that the epidemic is not yet controlled and will continue to grow. These trends are in stark contrast to other major COVID- 19 epidemics in Europe and Asia where enforced lockdowns have successfully driven the reproduction number below 1. While the Brazilian epidemic is still relatively nascent on a national scale, our results suggest that further action is needed to limit spread and prevent health system overload. 2 Introduction The world faces an unprecedented public health emergency in the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the emer- gence of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in China in December 2019, global spread has been rapid, with over 3.5 million cases and almost 250 thousand deaths reported from 187 countries as of the 6th May [13]. Though transmission of the disease beyond Asia was initially centred around Western Europe and North America, significant spread is now seen in other parts of the world, including many countries across Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. One such area of concern is Brazil - since report of its first case on 25th February, its epidemic has grown quickly, with the country now reporting over 135,000 cases and over 7,000 deaths [14]. In response to significant spread and community transmission of the virus within the country, Brazilian stateand city officials have mandated extensive public health measures to reduce the transmission ofCOVID- 19, including declaring a state of emergency, mandating the closure of retail and service businesses, DOI: Page 2 of 24 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.09.20096701; this version posted May 18, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . 8th May 2020 Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team restricting transportation, and closing schools. Specific packages of interventions have been decidedat the state level, with substantial variation between states in the extent to which measures have been adopted, and their comparative timing [4]. Importantly, interventions employed to date remain short of the widespread and mandatory lockdowns implemented across parts of Asia and Europe and which have proved to be highly effective at containing spread of the virus [7, 19]. 0 500 1000 1500 2000 3000+ 0 50 100 150 200 300+ (a) (b) Figure 1: Map of cases (a) and deaths (b) in Brazil by state level. Data source: Painel Coronavirus at https://covid.saude.gov.br, accessed on 7th May 2020. It remains unclear the extent to which these measures have been effective in reducing transmission across the country. Reported cases across Brazil have more than doubled over the past 10 days and show little sign of slowing. Given this rapid growth, a better understanding of the current epidemiologi- cal situation and the impact of interventions deployed to date is required to guide policy decisions aimed at preventing worsening of the public health emergency the country faces. Motivated by this, weex- tend a previously published semi-mechanistic Bayesian hierarchical model of COVID-19 epidemiological dynamics [7, 19] to assess the impact of interventions aimed at curbing transmission of COVID-19 across Brazil. In our framework we estimate the number of deaths, infections and transmission as afunction of patterns in human mobility. We utilise this framework to explore the epidemiological situationin detail at the state level and understand the spread of the virus across the country to date. These results include both estimates of the proportion of individuals infected so far as well as the impact ofdiffer- ent control interventions, and provide insight into possible future epidemic trajectories should further control measures be employed, or current interventions relaxed. DOI: Page 3 of 24 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.09.20096701; this version posted May 18, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . 8th May 2020 Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team State IFR % Population Deaths Deaths per million Infections (thousands) Attack rate % Reproduction number SP 0.7 46,289,333 3,045 65.80 1,530 [1,310, 1,700] 3.30 [2.83, 3.68] 1.47 [1.34, 1.59] RJ 0.8 17,366,189 1,205 69.40 582 [492, 657] 3.35 [2.83, 3.78] 1.44 [1.28, 1.60] CE 1.1 9,187,886 848 92.30 410 [343, 464] 4.46 [3.73, 5.05] 1.61 [1.42, 1.81] PE 1.1 9,617,072 803 83.50 288 [239, 328] 3.00 [2.49, 3.41] 1.32 [1.14, 1.53] AM 0.8 4,207,714 751 178 448 [372, 509] 10.60 [8.84, 12.10] 1.58 [1.38, 1.81] PA 0.9 8,690,745 392 45.10 439 [339, 513] 5.05 [3.90, 5.90] 1.90 [1.57, 2.31] MA 1.0 7,114,598 291 40.90 147 [118, 170] 2.07 [1.65, 2.40] 1.55 [1.32, 1.80] BA 1.1 14,930,424 160 10.70 59.5 [46.5, 69.6] 0.40 [0.31, 0.47] 1.37 [1.14, 1.63] ES 0.9 4,064,052 145 35.70 91 [69.4, 107] 2.24 [1.71, 2.64] 1.57 [1.29, 1.90] PR 0.9 11,516,840 101 8.77 28.4 [21.6, 33.6] 0.25 [0.19, 0.29] 1.16 [0.95, 1.39] MG 1.0 21,292,666 97 4.56 28.1 [21, 33.4] 0.13 [0.10, 0.16] 1.30 [1.05, 1.57] PB 1.2 4,039,277 92 22.80 25.7 [19.4, 30.4] 0.64 [0.48, 0.75] 1.23 [0.97, 1.52] AL 1.1 3,351,092 89 26.60 40.1 [29, 48.1] 1.20 [0.87, 1.44] 1.27 [0.94, 1.67] RS 0.9 11,422,973 87 7.62 48.2 [36.3, 57.1] 0.42 [0.32, 0.50] 1.44 [1.15, 1.77] RN 1.1 3,534,165 72 20.40 19.9 [14.7, 23.7] 0.56 [0.42, 0.67] 1.18 [0.92, 1.45] SC 0.8 7,252,502 59 8.14 16.5 [12.2, 19.7] 0.23 [0.17, 0.27] 1.14 [0.91, 1.38] Table 1: Estimated infection fatality ratio (IFR), state population, reported deaths and deaths permillion population, estimated number of infections in thousands, attack rate (AR), and time-varying reproduc- tion number on 6 May 2020 with 95% credible intervals, for São Paulo (SP), Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Pernam- buco (PE), Ceará (CE), Amazonas (AM), Pará (PA), Maranhão (MA), Bahia (BA), Espírito Santo (ES), Paraná (PR), Minas Gerais (MG), Paraíba (PB), Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Rio Grande do Norte (RN), Alagoas (AL), Santa Catarina (SC).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 14 Novembre 2018 La Recherche Sur La Technologie "Gene Drive" Peut
    14 Novembre 2018 La recherche sur la technologie "gene drive" peut bénéficier la conservation et la santé publique La communauté internationale est confrontée à des défis existentiels qui compromettent notre future, de la perte catastrophique de la biodiversité à de graves menaces pour la santé publique. Les cas de paludisme sont à nouveau à la hausse après des décennies de progrès, et les écosystèmes fragiles connaissent une intensification croissante des extinctions. Ces défis nécessitent des outils nouveaux et complémentaires si nous voulons atteindre les Objectifs de Développement Durable et les Objectifs d'Aichi.i. Alors que la Convention sur la Diversité Biologique (CDB) se réunit pour la 14ème Conférence des Parties (COP14) en Égypte en novembre, les autorités des pays du monde entier auront l'occasion de réaffirmer l'importance de permettre la recherche pour soutenir l'innovation responsable et la prise de décision basée sur des évidences. Fermer la porte à la recherche en créant des barrières arbitraires, une forte incertitude, et des retards indéterminés limitera considérablement notre capacité à fournir des réponses aux questions que les responsables politiques, les régulateurs, et le public sont en train de poser. Le moratoire proposé au sein du CDB sur les lâchers expérimentaux empêcherait l’évaluation complète des utilisations potentielles du « gene drive ». La faisabilité et les modalités de tout lâcher expérimental devrait plutôt être évaluées au cas par cas. Une grande partie des progrès que nous avons réalisés au cours du siècle dernier en matière d’amélioration des moyens de subsistance et du bien-être des communautés du monde entier est le résultat de l’accroissement des connaissances acquises grâce à la recherche scientifique.
    [Show full text]
  • MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling
    Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling MRC Centre for ANNUAL REPORT Outbreak Analysis and Modelling www.imperial.ac.uk/medicine/outbreaks 2012 The Centre specialises in quantitative epidemiology encompassing mathematical modelling, statistical analysis and evolutionary epidemiology, to aid the control and Director’s message treatment of infectious diseases. April 2013 sees the Centre renewed for a second 5-year Consortium (led by Tim Hallett) and the Vaccine Modelling term, after we received an unprecedented 10 out of 10 Initiative – are up for renewal. However, grants are only score from the MRC subcommittee, which assessed the one aspect of the relationship. As important are the close performance of the Centre over its first term. Just as the working relationships between staff in the Centre and the work of the Centre over that time has been very much a Foundation, which sees our research increasingly used to team effort, so was the success of the renewal. inform Foundation strategy and delivery. The last few months have seen us start to drive through Despite its title, the Centre’s mission rapidly evolved to our strategy for the next 5 years. A crucial aspect of this encompass delivering innovative epidemiological analysis is to boost capacity in key research areas. It is therefore not only of novel infectious disease outbreaks, but also of my pleasure to welcome new academic staff into the endemic diseases of major global health significance. Our Centre. Xavier Didelot joined us last year as a lecturer in work on polio, malaria and HIV reflects this. However, the pathogen genetics, and our expertise in evolutionary and last few months have highlighted the ongoing relevance of genetic research will be further boosted this year by the our original mission to enhance preparedness and response recruitment of at least one additional member of academic to emerging disease threats.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Roadmap out of Lockdown: Step 3
    2021-05-05 Imperial College London Evaluating the Roadmap out of Lockdown: Step 3 Raphael Sonabend, Lilith K Whittles, Natsuko Imai, Edward S Knock, Pablo N Perez-Guzman, Tara Mangal, Alexandra B Hogan, Erik M Volz, Azra Ghani, Neil M Ferguson, Marc Baguelin, Anne Cori MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London 1. Summary In this report, we summarise the findings of our evaluation of the successive easing of non- pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) as set out in the UK Government’s Roadmap out of Lockdown. Full methods, data used, and parameter values assumed for forward projections are given in the technical appendix. Key parameters relevant to interpretation of findings are provided in the text. Results and assumptions refer to England unless otherwise specified. 1. We estimate the current level of transmission, Reff, is approximately 1 in England. This estimate may not fully capture the impact of schools opening after Easter given the 3-week delay before changes in contact rates are reflected in surveillance data streams. 2. Based on PHE data available to 28 April 2021, 64% of the adult population in England have received at least one vaccine dose and 26% have received two doses. Under our central assumptions on vaccine effectiveness, this translates to 40% of adults (or 31% of the whole population) protected against symptomatic disease and 49% of adults (or 38% of the whole population) protected against severe disease (hospitalisation) via vaccination. Note this also includes individuals who are also protected due to recovery from past infection. 3. We estimate that an additional 15% of the population who are not protected through vaccination are currently protected due to recovery from past infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly COVID-19 Pandemic Briefing – Mathematical Modelling and Response Decisions
    Transcript Webinar: Weekly COVID-19 Pandemic Briefing – Mathematical Modelling and Response Decisions Professor David Heymann CBE Distinguished Fellow, Global Health Programme, Chatham House, Executive Director, Communicable Diseases Cluster, World Health Organization (1998-2003) Professor Azra Ghani Chair of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London Chair: Emma Ross Senior Consulting Fellow, Global Health Programme, Chatham House Event date: 01 July 2020 The views expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the speaker(s) and participants, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Chatham House, its staff, associates or Council. Chatham House is independent and owes no allegiance to any government or to any political body. It does not take institutional positions on policy issues. This document is issued on the understanding that if any extract is used, the author(s)/speaker(s) and Chatham House should be credited, preferably with the date of the publication or details of the event. Where this document refers to or reports statements made by speakers at an event, every effort has been made to provide a fair representation of their views and opinions. The published text of speeches and presentations may differ from delivery. © The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2020. 10 St James’s Square, London SW1Y 4LE T +44 (0)20 7957 5700 F +44 (0)20 7957 5710 www.chathamhouse.org Patron: Her Majesty The Queen Chair: Jim O’Neill Director: Dr Robin Niblett Charity Registration Number: 208223 2 Webinar: Weekly COVID-19 Pandemic Briefing – Mathematical Modelling and Response Decisions Emma Ross Good morning and thank you for joining us for this week’s Chatham House COVID-19 briefing with Distinguished Fellow David Heymann.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19: Moderna Applies for US and EU Approval As Vaccine
    NEWS BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.m4709 on 2 December 2020. Downloaded from The BMJ Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4709 Covid-19: Moderna applies for US and EU approval as vaccine trial http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4709 reports 94.1% efficacy Published: 02 December 2020 Elisabeth Mahase The drug company Moderna has applied for covid-19 disease, the statistical uncertainty in this is emergency use authorisation from the US Food and such that the data are compatible with a true efficacy Drug Administration and conditional approval from of about 87%. the European Medicines Agency for its covid-19 “This is of course, still a very good efficacy. Similarly, vaccine. the 100% efficacy against more severe disease is The move comes after new results were released from compatible with an efficacy of 90%—again, this is its phase III trial, showing vaccine efficacy of 94.1% very good and is some evidence that severe as well based on 196 covid-19 cases, of which 185 were in the as mild disease is prevented.” placebo group. Azra Ghani, infectious disease epidemiology chair at The company expects an FDA meeting to take place Imperial College London, said, “The results have been on 17 December to review the safety and efficacy data. tested across a diverse population and are reported It also plans to submit the phase III data to a peer as being consistent in different subgroups, although reviewed publication. these numbers are not given and we should wait for further information in the scientific article that is By the end of 2020 an estimated 20 million doses of being prepared.
    [Show full text]
  • New Data on Oxford Astrazeneca Vaccine Backs 12 Week Dosing
    NEWS BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.n326 on 3 February 2021. Downloaded from London, UK Cite this as: BMJ 2021;372:n326 Covid-19: New data on Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine backs 12 week http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n326 dosing interval Published: 03 February 2021 Jacqui Wise The UK’s approach of leaving an interval of three reassures us that people are protected from 22 days months between doses of the Oxford AstraZeneca after a single dose of the vaccine.” covid-19 vaccine has been supported by new data, Commenting on the study, Paul Hunter, professor in with the Oxford University researchers also saying medicine at the University of East Anglia, said, the vaccine “may have a substantial impact on “Taking all this evidence together, the 12 week gap transmission.” between first and second dose is clearly the better The paper, a preprint currently under review at the strategy as more people can be protected more Lancet, is an analysis of additional data from trials quickly and the ultimate protective effect is greater. involving 17 177 participants in the UK, Brazil, and Given the poor efficacy at preventing asymptomatic South Africa.1 It includes the results of a further infections, the vaccine will not stop transmission of month of data collection with 332 cases of covid but will still go a long way to reduce the R value symptomatic covid-19—an additional 201 cases than and transmission because there will be far fewer were previously reported.2 symptomatic infections and people who are symptomatic are rather more infectious than those A single standard dose of vaccine provided 76% who are asymptomatic.” protection overall against symptomatic covid-19 in the first 90 days after vaccination with protection not Azra Ghani, chair in infectious disease epidemiology falling in this time frame.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 20: Using Mobility to Estimate the Transmission Intensity of COVID-19 in Italy: a Subnational Analysis with Future Scenarios
    4th May 2020 Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team Report 20: Using mobility to estimate the transmission intensity of COVID-19 in Italy: A subnational analysis with future scenarios Michaela A. C. Vollmer∗, Swapnil Mishra∗, H Juliette T Unwin∗, Axel Gandy∗, Thomas A. Mellan, Valerie Bradley, Harrison Zhu, Helen Coupland, Iwona Hawryluk, Michael Hutchinson, Oliver Ratmann, Melodie Monod, Patrick Walker, Charlie Whittaker, Lorenzo Cattarino, Constance Ciavarella, Lucia Cilloni, Kylie Ainslie, Marc Baguelin, Sangeeta Bhatia, Adhiratha Boonyasiri, Nicholas Brazeau, Giovanni Charles, Laura V Cooper, Zulma Cucunuba, Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg, Amy Dighe, Bimandra Djaafara, Jeff Eaton, Sabine L van Elsland, Richard FitzJohn, Keith Fraser, Katy Gaythorpe, Will Green, Sarah Hayes, Natsuko Imai, Ben Jeffrey, Edward Knock, Daniel Laydon, John Lees, Tara Mangal, Andria Mousa, Gemma Nedjati-Gilani, Pierre Nouvellet, Daniela Olivera, Kris V Parag, Michael Pickles, Hayley A Thompson, Robert Verity, Car- oline Walters, Haowei Wang, Yuanrong Wang, Oliver J Watson, Lilith Whittles, Xiaoyue Xi, Azra Ghani, Steven M Riley, Lucy Okell, Christl A. Donnelly, Neil M Ferguson1, Ilaria Dorigatti3, Seth Flaxman∗ and Samir Bhatt2∗ Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Modelling MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analytics Abdul Latif Jameel Institute for Disease and Emergency Analytics, Imperial College London Department of Statistics, University of Oxford ∗Contributed equally. Correspondence: [email protected] [email protected] 3i.dori- [email protected] Summary Italy was the first European country to experience sustained local transmission of COVID-19. Asof1st May 2020, the Italian health authorities reported 28;238 deaths nationally.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Bayesian Modelling Strategy to Predict Deaths by Covid-19: Amodelandcasestudyforthe State of Santa Catarina,Brazil
    WEEKLY BAYESIAN MODELLING STRATEGY TO PREDICT DEATHS BY COVID-19: A MODEL AND CASE STUDY FOR THE STATE OF SANTA CATARINA,BRAZIL Pedro Henrique da Costa Avelar1,2, Luis C. Lamb2, Sophia Tsoka3, and Jonathan Cardoso-Silva 1,3∗ 1Data Science Brigade, Porto Alegre, Brazil 2Institute of Informatics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil 3Department of Informatics, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom ABSTRACT Background: The novel coronavirus pandemic has affected Brazil’s Santa Catarina State (SC) severely. At the time of writing (24 March 2021), over 764,000 cases and over 9,800 deaths by COVID-19 have been confirmed, hospitals were fully occupied with local news reporting at least 397 people in the waiting list for an ICU bed. Despite initial state-wide measures at the outbreak of the pandemic, the state government passed most responsibilities down to cities local government, leaving them to plan whether and when to apply Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs). In an attempt to better inform local policy making, we applied an existing Bayesian algorithm to model the spread of the pandemic in the seven geographic macro-regions of the state. However, as we found that the model was too reactive to change in data trends, here we propose changes to extend the model and improve its forecasting capabilities. Methods: Our four proposed variations of the original method allow accessing data of daily reported infections and take into account under-reporting of cases more explicitly. Two of the proposed versions also attempt to model the delay in test reporting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feasibility of Malaria Elimination on the Island of Hispaniola, with a Focus on Haiti
    The feasibility of malaria elimination on the island of Hispaniola, with a focus on Haiti An assessment conducted January–June 2013 Photo © 2012 Natalie Briggs/Global Health Outreach, Courtesy of Photoshare In St. Marc, Haiti, two boys play with playdough while their parents are at the dentist. The cover photograph is used for illustrative purposes only; it does not imply any particular health status, attitudes, behaviors, or actions on the part of any person who appears in the photograph. 1 Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Objectives ................................................................................................................................................. 8 History ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 Current response ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Technical assessment ................................................................................................................................ 8 Operational assessment...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Simulations Driving the World's Response to COVID-19
    Special report AFP/GETTY Staff at a car-manufacturing plant in Wuhan, China, observe social-distancing measures during their lunch break. had a day off since mid-January.” Research does not get much more policy-relevant than this. When updated data in the Imperial team’s model1 indicated that the United Kingdom’s health service would soon be overwhelmed with severe cases of COVID-19, MODELLING and might face more than 500,000 deaths if the government took no action, Prime Minister Boris Johnson almost immediately announced stringent new restrictions on people’s move- ments. The same model suggested that, with no action, the United States might face 2.2 million THE PANDEMIC deaths; it was shared with the White House and new guidance on social distancing quickly The simulations driving the world’s followed (see ‘Simulation shock’). response to COVID-19. By David Adam Governments across the world are relying on mathematical projections to help guide deci- sions in this pandemic. Computer simulations account for only a fraction of the data analyses hen Neil Ferguson visited than 36 hours later, he announced on Twitter that modelling teams have performed in the cri- the heart of British govern- that he had a fever and a cough. A positive test sis, Ferguson notes, but they are an increasingly ment in London’s Downing followed. The disease-tracking scientist had important part of policymaking. But, as he and Street, he was much closer become a data point in his own project. other modellers warn, much information about to the COVID-19 pandemic Ferguson is one of the highest-profile faces in how SARS-CoV-2 spreads is still unknown and than he realized.
    [Show full text]
  • Is COVID-19 Magnifying Colonial Attitudes in Global Health?
    Is COVID-19 magnifying colonial attitudes in global health? devex.com/news/is-covid-19-magnifying-colonial-attitudes-in-global-health-97499 Amruta Byatnal June 19, 2020 A medical worker takes a sample for COVID-19 during a community testing in Abuja, Nigeria. Photo by: Afolabi Sotunde / Reuters NEW DELHI — A paper called “The Impact of COVID-19 and Strategies for Mitigation and Suppression in Low- and Middle-Income Countries” was recently released in the journal Science. It lists 49 authors, from 5 prestigious universities in the U.K. and United States. Missing conspicuously was local representation from the countries that the paper talked about. Researchers from low-income countries are “never at the table,” said Senjuti Saha, a microbiologist working at the Child Health Research Foundation in Bangladesh. “There’s not a single author from within our countries. It’s a really good paper but my thing is, who in Bangladesh is going to read a Science paper? Who is going to get that information? Is my policymaker going to read a Science paper unless they have some representation from Bangladesh? Absolutely not,” Saha told Devex. On Twitter, the paper’s authors fielded similar reactions, with many using the hashtag #DecolonizeGlobalHealth 1/7 I absolutely agree and many papers are in preparation that have this. But capacity in this field is limited and most of our partners are busy supporting their country public health response. Our aim is to provide the science and tools to support this. — Azra Ghani (@azraghani) June 13, 2020 Via Twitter. Colonizing in this sense refers to the idea that western researchers and practitioners impose solutions and decisions on countries that are under-resourced without involving people from those places.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Associate .Pdf
    Job Description Job Title: Research Associate Centre/Department/School/Faculty: MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis (MRC GIDA), and Abdul Latif Jameel Institute for Disease and Emergency Analytics (J-IDEA), Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine Campus location: St Mary’s Campus (Paddington) Job Family/Level: Academic & Research, Research Associate Responsible to: Professor Neil Ferguson Key Working Relationships Research groups and department staff (internal): Contract type: Full time and Fixed term until 30 September 2022 Purpose of the Post Understanding SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics, impact of NPIs, and vaccination The current COVID-19 pandemic is the greatest threat posed by a respiratory virus since the 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic. As countries start to roll out mass vaccination programmes, they must balance the parallel lifting of non-pharmaceutical interventions carefully to prevent another wave of cases, hospitalisations, and deaths. Availability and equitable allocation of vaccines within and between countries will be critical. Potential areas of work include: ▪ Real-time modelling of the epidemic in the UK and globally ▪ Comparisons of interventions across countries ▪ Quantifying the potential impact of vaccine roll out strategies on the COVID-19 pandemic and implications for release of non-pharmaceutical interventions ▪ Quantifying the impact of new variants of concern on transmissibility, severity, and the epidemic trajectory ▪ Tracking the COVID-19 epidemic globally to provide epidemic trajectories at country level to support WHO and country situational awareness and planning We are looking for people with experience in: a) Epidemiological analysis – experience in epidemiological analysis of infectious disease data. b) Data collection - experience with systematic literature reviews, data collection, and extraction.
    [Show full text]