Arxiv:1102.1108V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 5 Feb 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arxiv:1102.1108V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 5 Feb 2011 Draft version January 17, 2019 A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 8/13/10 THE STEPPENWOLF: A PROPOSAL FOR A HABITABLE PLANET IN INTERSTELLAR SPACE D. S. Abbot1 and E. R. Switzer2,3 Draft version January 17, 2019 ABSTRACT Rogue planets have been ejected from their planetary system. We investigate the possibility that a rogue planet could maintain a liquid ocean under layers of thermally-insulating water ice and frozen atmosphere as a result of geothermal heat flux. We find that a rogue planet of Earth-like composition and age could maintain a subglacial liquid ocean if it were ≈3.5 times more massive than Earth. If a rogue planet had about ten times higher water mass fraction or a thick cryo-atmospheric layer, it would need to be only ≈0.3 times the mass of Earth to maintain a liquid ocean. Such a planet could be detected from reflected solar radiation and its thermal emission could be characterized in the far-IR if it passed within O(1000) AU of Earth. Subject headings: Steppenwolf planet, rogue planet, free-floater, habitability 1. INTRODUCTION effect of a thermally-insulating frozen cryo-atmosphere. As a planetary system forms, some planets or plan- We reach the perhaps surprising conclusion that it would etesimals, referred to as “rogue” planets, can enter hy- be possible for such a planet to harbor a subglacial ocean. perbolic orbits and be ejected from the system as a re- This point is of interest since a subglacial ocean could sult of gravitational interactions with gas giant plan- serve as a habitat for life which, because of energy sources ets (Lissauer 1987). The ability of a rogue planet to provided by an active mantle, would be more feasible support life is of interest as a sort of pathological ex- than Gaidos et al. (1999) have argued it would be for icy ample of planetary habitability, because such a planet moons such as Europa and Callisto. We will refer to a could potentially represent a viable option for interstel- rogue planet harboring a subglacial ocean as a Steppen- lar panspermia (Durand-Manterola 2010), and because wolf planet, since any life in this strange habitat would such a planet could be the closest source of extrasolar exist like a lone wolf wandering the galactic steppe. life for exploration by humanity in the distant future. We can imagine that the ice layer on top of an ocean Since some sort of starting point is required to discuss on a Steppenwolf planet will grow until either it reaches the issue, a planet is often defined as habitable if it can steady-state or all available water freezes. Geothermal sustain liquid water at its surface (Kasting et al. 1993). heat from the interior of the Steppenwolf planet will be Stevenson (1999) argued that if a rogue planet had an carried through the ice layer by conduction, and poten- extremely high pressure hydrogen atmosphere, pressure- tially by convection in the lower, warmer, and less viscous broadening of far-infrared molecular hydrogen absorp- portion of the ice layer. Since convection transports heat tion could cause a greenhouse effect strong enough that much more efficiently than conduction, the steady-state liquid water could be maintained on the planet’s surface ice thickness will be much larger if convection occurs, as a result of the geothermal heat flux alone, making the making it harder to maintain a subglacial ocean. planet potentially habitable. Here we will calculate steady-state ice thicknesses as- Subglacial liquid water oceans on icy bodies represent suming that heat is lost through conduction alone, then an alternative type of habitat. It is well-known that argue that it is reasonable to assume that heat loss will subglacial oceans are possible around moons of giant be dominated by conduction in the parameter regime planets and trans-neptunian objects in the solar system of interest. We must acknowledge, however, that it is arXiv:1102.1108v1 [astro-ph.EP] 5 Feb 2011 (Hussmann et al. 2006), as well as water exoplanets in very difficult to establish definitively whether convection distant orbits (Ehrenreich et al. 2006; Fu et al. 2010). In would occur without detailed knowledge of conditions in this paper, we will consider whether an Earth-like rogue and microscale composition of the ice (Barr & Showman planet, not attached to any star and receiving negligible 2009). More generally, we will make many simplifi- energy at its surface, could sustain a subglacial liquid cations, including considering the question within the ocean. By Earth-like, we mean specifically within an or- framework of a one-dimensional (vertical) model, since der of magnitude in mass and water complement, similar we wish to establish whether or not a Steppenwolf planet in composition of radionuclides in the mantle, and of sim- is feasible, rather than to make a detailed study of it. ilar age. In addition to standard considerations relating to ice thermodynamics, we also consider the potential 2. GEOPHYSICAL CONSIDERATIONS First we calculate the conductive steady-state thick- ≈ [email protected], [email protected] ness, H. Above 10 K, the temperature de- 1 Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of pendence of the thermal conductivity of water ice Chicago, 5734 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637 −1 2 is well-approximated by k(T ) = AT , where T Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of −1 Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637 is the temperature in Kelvin and A=651 W m 3 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of (Petrenko & Whitworth 2002). Dimensional analysis Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637 shows that thermal steady-state is reached in ∼ 106 2 Abbot and Switzer years, much shorter than the timescale of decay of the that even a layer with thermal conductivity and density geothermal heat flux. Geothermal heat flux through the which are each five times lower than those of solid carbon shell will be constant at steady-state, since no heat is dioxide, to account for possible snow-like behavior, will produced within the ice, as would occur by tidal heating still intersect first with the melting curve at its base, with of a frozen moon. Since the Steppenwolf planets we con- pressure exceeding the triple point’s at 0.52 MPa. Be- sider would be much larger and dryer than the icy moons cause of the weak temperature dependence of the melting on which subglacial oceans are typically studied, we can curve in this regime (Giordano et al. 2006), we find that assume that the ice thickness is much less than the plan- the maximum supportable temperature at the base of a etary radius, which yields an exponential temperature carbon dioxide layer is robustly ≈ 220 K for Earth-like profile through the ice and steady-state-thickness Steppenwolf planets. Setting T0 = 220 K reduces the steady-state water-ice thickness by an order of magni- A T H = log H , (1) tude. F T0 At Earth mass, the temperature at the bottom of a layer of solid CO2 reaches the melting temperature of 6 −2 where TH is the temperature at the ice-water interface CO2 for a layer thickness of ≈ 2 km, or ≈ 3×10 kg m . (the melting temperature), T0 is the temperature at the Venus’ atmosphere has a partial pressure of CO2 of top of the ice, and F is the geothermal heat flux. ≈90 bar (≈ 106 kg m−2), which is roughly the vapor Decay of radioactive elements in Earth’s interior and pressure of carbonate rocks at Venus’ surface tempera- primordial heat remaining from Earth’s formation lead to ture, implying that there may be more carbon locked in an average geothermal heat flux emanating from Earth’s rock in equilibrium with the atmosphere (Pierrehumbert −2 surface of F⊕=0.087 W m (Pollack et al. 1993). This 2010). The store of carbon in carbonate rocks in Earth’s heat flux decays with time such that Earth’s geother- interior is uncertain, but is estimated to be roughly 5 mal heat flux may have been roughly twice its present 10 times that in atmospheric CO2 (Berner 2004), or value 3 Gyr ago (Turcotte 1980). In order to con- ≈ 3 × 105 kg m−2. Therefore it appears reasonable to sider Steppenwolf planets of different sizes, we use the assume that a Steppenwolf planet could have a sufficient radius–mass scaling R ∝ M v for Super-Earths with complement of CO2 to significantly elevate T0, although v =0.27 (Valencia et al. 2006). Heuristically, this yields a Steppenwolf planet might need a larger carbon com- 1−2v a geothermal heat flux that scales as (M/M⊕) , or plement than Earth or Venus for the bottom of the cryo- roughly as the square root of the mass. atmospheric layer to reach the melting point of CO2. The pressure at the bottom of the ice layer is ≈ Finally, we note that to find an upper bound on the im- 9 MPa for each kilometer of ice, scaling with mass as pact of a cryo-atmospheric layer we have ignored possible 1−2v (M/M⊕) . The melting point of pure ice is 250–270 K convection of solid CO2 into the water-ice. at pressures less than 620 MPa (Choukroun & Grasset 2007), although contaminants to pure ice could suppress the melting point (Hussmann et al. 2006). The steady- 240 state thickness is only logarithmically sensitive to TH , so we simply take TH = 260 K in the estimates here. In steady-state, the temperature at the surface of a Step- 120 penwolf planet (Ts), i.e., the top of the ice or cryo- atmospheric layer, will be set by a balance between ther- 4 mal emission and geothermal heat flux, F = σTs , where σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant.
Recommended publications
  • A Lonely Planet Lost in Space
    SPACE SCOOP NEWS FROM ACROSS THE UNIVERSE 14A LonelyНоември Planet2012 Lost in Space A rogue planet has been spotted wandering alone through space with no parent star in sight! The little orphan is thought to have formed in the same way as normal planets: from the leftover material around a young star. But for some reason this planet got kicked out of its home. Planets don't shine with their own light. If you've ever seen Venus, Mars or Jupiter in the night sky, you're actually seeing light from the Sun (the star closest to Earth) reflecting off them. Since rogue planets aren’t close to any stars, they don’t reflect any starlight making them very difficult to spot. Astronomers actually think these wandering worlds might be more common than stars in our Galaxy, but we just have a hard time spotting them! It's always tricky trying to calculate the size of objects so far away in space. Try looking at a boat on the horizon and try to guess how far it is and how big it is! It's even harder when the object is very dark and floating through space. Astronomers admit that they might have misjudged the size of this little rogue — it might not even be a planet at all, but a Brown Dwarf! These are star-like objects that are much bigger than planets — up to about 80 times bigger than Jupiter — but too small to be stars. They don't burn fuel at their cores, like stars do, so they are too cold to shine brightly.
    [Show full text]
  • Exep Science Plan Appendix (SPA) (This Document)
    ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 1 of 61 Created By: David A. Breda Date Program TDEM System Engineer Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Dr. Nick Siegler Date Program Chief Technologist Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Concurred By: Dr. Gary Blackwood Date Program Manager Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology EXOPDr.LANET Douglas Hudgins E XPLORATION PROGRAMDate Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program ScienceScience Plan Mission DirectorateAppendix NASA Headquarters Karl Stapelfeldt, Program Chief Scientist Eric Mamajek, Deputy Program Chief Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program JPL CL#19-0790 JPL Document No: 1735632 ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 2 of 61 Approved by: Dr. Gary Blackwood Date Program Manager, Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory Dr. Douglas Hudgins Date Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Science Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters Created by: Dr. Karl Stapelfeldt Chief Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Dr. Eric Mamajek Deputy Program Chief Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology This research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. © 2018 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Exoplanet Exploration Program JPL CL#19-0790 ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 3 of 61 Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Substellar Objects Below the Deuterium Burning Mass Limit: Planets, Brown Dwarfs Or What?
    geosciences Review A Review on Substellar Objects below the Deuterium Burning Mass Limit: Planets, Brown Dwarfs or What? José A. Caballero Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), ESAC, Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, E-28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain; [email protected] Received: 23 August 2018; Accepted: 10 September 2018; Published: 28 September 2018 Abstract: “Free-floating, non-deuterium-burning, substellar objects” are isolated bodies of a few Jupiter masses found in very young open clusters and associations, nearby young moving groups, and in the immediate vicinity of the Sun. They are neither brown dwarfs nor planets. In this paper, their nomenclature, history of discovery, sites of detection, formation mechanisms, and future directions of research are reviewed. Most free-floating, non-deuterium-burning, substellar objects share the same formation mechanism as low-mass stars and brown dwarfs, but there are still a few caveats, such as the value of the opacity mass limit, the minimum mass at which an isolated body can form via turbulent fragmentation from a cloud. The least massive free-floating substellar objects found to date have masses of about 0.004 Msol, but current and future surveys should aim at breaking this record. For that, we may need LSST, Euclid and WFIRST. Keywords: planetary systems; stars: brown dwarfs; stars: low mass; galaxy: solar neighborhood; galaxy: open clusters and associations 1. Introduction I can’t answer why (I’m not a gangstar) But I can tell you how (I’m not a flam star) We were born upside-down (I’m a star’s star) Born the wrong way ’round (I’m not a white star) I’m a blackstar, I’m not a gangstar I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar I’m not a pornstar, I’m not a wandering star I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar Blackstar, F (2016), David Bowie The tenth star of George van Biesbroeck’s catalogue of high, common, proper motion companions, vB 10, was from the end of the Second World War to the early 1980s, and had an entry on the least massive star known [1–3].
    [Show full text]
  • Perfect Planet?
    Key Stage 3 – Perfect planet? Notes for teachers At a glance This activity for gifted and talented students introduces some of the fascinating worlds outside our own solar system. Students begin by learning about the conditions which might make a planet habitable. They then study data about exoplanets, and evaluate evidence to predict which might harbour life. Learning Outcomes Students outline the conditions that make an exoplanet habitable. Students evaluate evidence to predict which exoplanets might harbour life. Each group of two or three students will need 1 copy of the pupil worksheet 1 copy of the Planet profile to complete 1 copy of the sheet Habitable or not? to complete One Exoplanet information sheet. There are twelve of these, each about a different exoplanet. Each group needs a different one. They are best printed in colour and laminated. www.oxfordsparks.net/planet Possible Lesson Activities 1. Starter activity Show the animation ‘Rogue planet’ to the class. Repeat the viewing, focusing on the section on exoplanets from 1:32 to 2:16. 2. Main activity Divide the class into twelve groups, and outline the activity as described on the pupil worksheet. Allow students time to read Conditions for life and Habitable zone on the pupil worksheet, then check their understanding. Make the link between the term Goldilocks zone and the children’s story of the same name. Give each group one copy of the Planet profile proforma to complete as well as one Exoplanet information sheet. There are twelve Exoplanet information sheets; each group needs a different one. Allow time for each group to complete its Planet profile, then display these around the room.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Results from Gravitational Microlensing
    Recent Results from Gravitational Microlensing • Bound planets • Unbound/Distant planets Takahiro Sumi (Osaka University) MOA collaboration NASA/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt planetary microlensing Microlensing observation global network Survey Group Micro Follow-up Group lensing Alert MOA(NewZealand) PLANET µFUN OGLE(Chile), Robonet-II Anomaly Wide field Alert MiNDSTEp Low cadence • Pointing each candidate • High cadence MOA (since 1995) (Microlensing Observation in Astrophysics) ( New Zealand/Mt. John Observatory, Latitude: 44°S, Alt: 1029m ) Mirror : 1.8m CCD : 80M pix.(12x15cm) FOV : 2.2 deg.2 (10 times as full moon) Observational fields • 50 deg.2 disk Galactic Center • (200x full moon) • 50 M stars 1obs/1hr 1obs/10min. ~600events/yr http://www.massey.ac.nz/~iabond/alert/alert.html Mass measurement of the cold, low-mass planet MOA-2009-BLG-266Lb Muraki et al. 2011 mp = 10.4 +- 1.7 MEarth M* = 0.56 +- 0.09 M a = 3.2 (+1.9 -0.5) AU Orbital period: P=7.6 (+7.7-1.5) yrs. demonstrates the capability to measure microlensing parallax with the Deep Impact (or EPOXI) spacecraft in a Heliocentric orbit. anomaly Summary of Planet candidates • RV • Transit (Kepler) • Direct image • Microlensing:14planets Mass measurements Mass by Bayesian Planet Frequency vs semimajor axis 6planets dN = 0.36 dex"2 dlogq dlogs M~0.5M 7x • Most ice & gas giant planets do not migrate very far in K,M dwarf ! dN/dloga=0.39±0.15 • Amount of migration M~M is a continuous parameter Gould et al. 2010 Planet mass ratio function 4 Neptune, 1 sub-Saturn, dN n "q 5 Jupiter dlogq n = −0.68 ±0.20 (Sumi et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 117, March 2009
    NNASA’sASA’s LunarLunar ScienceScience InstituteInstitute BeginsBegins WorkWork It has been 40 years since humans fi rst set foot upon the Moon, taking that historic “giant step” for mankind. Although interest in our nearest celestial neighbor has waned considerably, it has never disappeared completely and is now enjoying a remarkable resurgence. The Moon was born when our home planet encountered a rogue planet at its birth, and has since recorded the earliest history of the solar system (a record nearly obliterated on Earth). With four spacecraft orbiting the Moon in the past three years (from four separate nation groups) and a fi fth, Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, due to arrive this spring, we are about to remake our understanding of this planetary body. To further contribute to the advancement of our knowledge, NASA recently created a Lunar Science Institute (NLSI) to revitalize the lunar science community and train a new generation of scientists. This spring, NASA has selected seven academic and research teams to form the initial core of the NLSI. This virtual institute is designed to support scientifi c research that supplements and extends existing NASA lunar science programs in coordination with U.S. space exploration policy. The new teams that augment NLSI were selected in a competitive evaluation process that began with the release of a cooperative agreement notice in June 2008. NASA received proposals from 33 research teams. L“We are extremely pleased with the response of the science community and the high quality of proposals received,” said David Morrison, the institute’s interim director at NASA Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2010.00015V3 [Hep-Ph] 26 Apr 2021 Galactic Halo Can Scatter with Exoplanets, Lose Energy, and Gles Are the Same Set of Planets, Without DM Heating
    MIT-CTP/5230 SLAC-PUB-17556 Exoplanets as Sub-GeV Dark Matter Detectors Rebecca K. Leane1, 2, ∗ and Juri Smirnov3, 4, y 1Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 2SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94039, USA 3Center for Cosmology and AstroParticle Physics (CCAPP), The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA 4Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA (Dated: April 27, 2021) We present exoplanets as new targets to discover Dark Matter (DM). Throughout the Milky Way, DM can scatter, become captured, deposit annihilation energy, and increase the heat flow within exoplanets. We estimate upcoming infrared telescope sensitivity to this scenario, finding actionable discovery or exclusion searches. We find that DM with masses above about an MeV can be probed with exoplanets, with DM-proton and DM-electron scattering cross sections down to about 10−37cm2, stronger than existing limits by up to six orders of magnitude. Supporting evidence of a DM origin can be identified through DM-induced exoplanet heating correlated with Galactic position, and hence DM density. This provides new motivation to measure the temperature of the billions of brown dwarfs, rogue planets, and gas giants peppered throughout our Galaxy. Introduction{Are we alone in the Universe? This ques- Exoplanet Temperatures tion has driven wide-reaching interest in discovering a 104 planet like our own. Regardless of whether or not we ever find alien life, the scientific advances from finding DM Heating and understanding other planets will be enormous. From a particle physics perspective, new celestial bodies pro- vide a vast playground to discover new physics.
    [Show full text]
  • 9:00 Pm SFAA ANNUAL AWARDS and MEMBERSHIP DINNER MARIPOSA HUNTER’S POINT YACHT CLUB 405 Terry A
    Vol. 64, No. 1 – January2016 FRIDAY, JANUARY 22, 2015 - 5:00 pm – 9:00 pm SFAA ANNUAL AWARDS AND MEMBERSHIP DINNER MARIPOSA HUNTER’S POINT YACHT CLUB 405 Terry A. Francois Boulevard San Francisco Directions: http://www.yelp.com/map/mariposa-hunters-point-yacht-club-san-francisco Dear Members, our Annual January get-together will be Friday, January 22nd, 2016 from 5:00 to 9:00 at the Mariposa, Hunter's Point Yacht Club. There are many things to celebrate in this fun atmosphere, with tacos served by El Tonayense, salads & more, along with a full cash bar. All members are invited and SFAA will be paying for food. Non-members are welcome at a cost of $25. Telescopes will be set up on the patio, which provides beautiful views of the bay. We will be celebrating a year when we have made a successful transition to the Presidio, have continued the success of the sharing and viewing we have on Mt Tam, expanded and strengthened our City Star Parties and volunteered at many schools. Our Yosemite trip was very successful and the opportunity to tour Lick Observatory will not be soon forgotten. We will also be welcoming new members to our board and commending those whose work and commitment, our club could not function without. We look forward to enjoying the evening with all those who enjoy the night sky with the San Francisco Amateur Astronomers. There is plenty of parking, as well as easy access from the KT line and the 22 bus. Please RSVP at [email protected] Anil Chopra 2016 SAN FRANCISCO AMATEUR ASTRONOMERS GENERAL ELECTION The following members have been elected to serve as San Francisco Amateur Astronomers’ Officers and Directors for calendar year 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • De Natura Rerum: Exoplanets and Exoearths Pierre Léna Que L’Homme Contemple La Nature Dans Sa Haute Et Pleine Majesté… Que La Terre Lui Paraisse Comme Un Point
    De Natura Rerum: Exoplanets and ExoEarths Pierre Léna Que l’homme contemple la nature dans sa haute et pleine majesté… que la Terre lui paraisse comme un point. Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) Pensées Introduction At the 2004 Plenary Session of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences on Paths of Discovery, I presented a paper with the title The case of exoplanets [Léna 2005]. It was then close to the 10th anniversary of the discovery of the first exoplanet in 1995. There is no point in repeating here this paper. But in the last decade, the discoveries on this subject have been so considerable that, the 20th anniversary coming, it is worth addressing the topic again. During the first decade 1995-2004, only 133 exoplanets had been discovered by an indirect method, and the first direct image of an exoplanet was not even confirmed. Today in our Galaxy containing the Earth, statistics begin to indicate that on average every star has a planet, which means over 100 billions of exoplanets for this galaxy alone, of which nearly 2000 are now identified and more or less characterized. How does the subject of exoplanets relate with the Evolving concepts of nature, the title of this Plenary Session? In the 2005 paper, I recalled the long history of a quest which began metaphysically with Democritus, was disputed theologically during the Middle Age, provided phantasies to poets and writers, until it emerged as a scientific problem, to be addressed with the investigative methods of astronomy during the 19th century. Along this path, Giordano Bruno, who expressed ideas close to Lucretius’s ones, was condemned to the fire for multiple reasons, including this one.
    [Show full text]
  • 1202 (Created: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 7:00:12 PM Eastern Standard Time) - Overview
    JWST Proposal 1202 (Created: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 7:00:12 PM Eastern Standard Time) - Overview 1202 - The NIRISS Survey for Young Brown Dwarfs and Rogue Planets Cycle: 1, Proposal Category: GTO INVESTIGATORS Name Institution E-Mail Dr. Aleks Scholz (PI) (ESA Member) University of St. Andrews [email protected] Prof. Ray Jayawardhana (CoI) Cornell University [email protected] Dr. Koraljka Muzic (CoI) (ESA Member) Universidade de Lisboa, Dept. of Fisica [email protected] Dr. David Lafreniere (CoI) (CSA Member) Universite de Montreal [email protected] Dr. Loic Albert (CoI) (CSA Member) Universite de Montreal [email protected] Dr. Rene Doyon (CoI) (CSA Member) Universite de Montreal [email protected] Dr. Doug Johnstone (CoI) (CSA Member) National Research Council of Canada [email protected] Prof. Michael R. Meyer (CoI) (US Admin CoI) University of Michigan [email protected] OBSERVATIONS Folder Observation Label Observing Template Science Target N1333-F1 1 N1333_KH NIRISS Wide Field Slitless Spectroscopy (1) NGC-1333 ABSTRACT How far down in mass the stellar initial mass function (IMF) extends is a fundamental, unresolved question in astrophysics. The shape of the IMF at the lowest masses will not only establish the boundary between objects that form `like stars' and those that form `like planets', but also distinguish among competing theoretical models for the origin of brown dwarfs. Thanks to extensive surveys by us and others, the IMF is now reasonably well characterised in several nearby star-forming regions down to about 10 Jupiter masses, but not below. While these surveys suggest that free-floating planetary-mass objects are relatively scarce, recent microlensing studies claim they may be twice as common as stars.
    [Show full text]
  • Infinite Worlds Supplement to Issue 8
    Infinite Worlds Supplement to Issue 8 The e-magazine of the Exoplanets Division Of the Asteroids and Remote Planets Section Supplement to Issue 8 2020 November 1 Contents Introduction Discoveries Conferences/Meetings/Seminars/Webinars – Scheduled Publications/Videos Astrobiology Space missions Space – stepping stones to other star systems And finally… for the fashionistas out there Introduction There was a considerable amount of material for inclusion in the October issue. So, in order to meet my publication deadline, and keep the issue to a reasonable size, I have included the remainder in this supplement. Discoveries Smallest Earth-sized free-floating planet https://en.uw.edu.pl/an-earth-sized-rogue-planet-discovered-in-the-milky-way/ Scientists announced the discovery of the shortest-timescale microlensing event ever found, called OGLE-2016-BLG-1928, which has the timescale of just 42 minutes. “When we first spotted this event, it was clear that it must have been caused by an extremely tiny object,” says Dr. Radosław Poleski from the Astronomical Observatory of the University of Warsaw, a co-author of the study. Indeed, models of the event indicate that the lens must have been less massive than Earth, it was probably a Mars-mass object. Moreover, the lens is likely a rogue planet. “If the lens were orbiting a star, we would detect its presence in the light curve of the event,” adds Dr. Poleski. “We can rule out the planet having a star within about 8 astronomical units – the astronomical unit is the distance between the Earth and the Sun”. Conferences/Meetings/Seminars/Webinars – Scheduled PLATO Mark Kidger advises that it is quite probable that there will be no PLATO meetings until 2021 Autumn at the earliest.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Planet?
    What is a Planet? Steven Soter Department of Astrophysics, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, and Center for Ancient Studies, New York University [email protected] submitted to The Astronomical Journal 16 Aug 2006, published in Vol. 132, pp. 2513-2519 Abstract. A planet is an end product of disk accretion around a primary star or substar. I quantify this definition by the degree to which a body dominates the other masses that share its orbital zone. Theoretical and observational measures of dynamical dominance reveal gaps of four to five orders of magnitude separating the eight planets of our solar system from the populations of asteroids and comets. The proposed definition dispenses with upper and lower mass limits for a planet. It reflects the tendency of disk evolution in a mature system to produce a small number of relatively large bodies (planets) in non-intersecting or resonant orbits, which prevent collisions between them. 1. Introduction Beginning in the 1990s astronomers discovered the Kuiper Belt, extrasolar planets, brown dwarfs, and free-floating planets. These discoveries have led to a re-examination of the conventional definition of a “planet” as a non-luminous body that orbits a star and is larger than an asteroid (see Stern & Levison 2002, Mohanty & Jayawardhana 2006, Basri & Brown 2006). When Tombaugh discovered Pluto in 1930, astronomers welcomed it as the long sought “Planet X”, which would account for residual perturbations in the orbit of Neptune. In fact those perturbations proved to be illusory, and the discovery of Pluto was fortuitous.
    [Show full text]