Characterizing Kepler Objects of Interest Using the Algorithm EXONEST
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Lonely Planet Lost in Space
SPACE SCOOP NEWS FROM ACROSS THE UNIVERSE 14A LonelyНоември Planet2012 Lost in Space A rogue planet has been spotted wandering alone through space with no parent star in sight! The little orphan is thought to have formed in the same way as normal planets: from the leftover material around a young star. But for some reason this planet got kicked out of its home. Planets don't shine with their own light. If you've ever seen Venus, Mars or Jupiter in the night sky, you're actually seeing light from the Sun (the star closest to Earth) reflecting off them. Since rogue planets aren’t close to any stars, they don’t reflect any starlight making them very difficult to spot. Astronomers actually think these wandering worlds might be more common than stars in our Galaxy, but we just have a hard time spotting them! It's always tricky trying to calculate the size of objects so far away in space. Try looking at a boat on the horizon and try to guess how far it is and how big it is! It's even harder when the object is very dark and floating through space. Astronomers admit that they might have misjudged the size of this little rogue — it might not even be a planet at all, but a Brown Dwarf! These are star-like objects that are much bigger than planets — up to about 80 times bigger than Jupiter — but too small to be stars. They don't burn fuel at their cores, like stars do, so they are too cold to shine brightly. -
Life Beyond Earth the Search for Habitable Worlds in the Universe
C:/ITOOLS/WMS/CUP-NEW/4181325/WORKINGFOLDER/COEN/9781107026179HTL.3D i [1–2] 27.6.2013 10:59AM Life Beyond Earth The Search for Habitable Worlds in the Universe With current missions to Mars and the Earth-like moon Titan, and many more missions planned, humankind stands on the verge of exciting progress and possible major discoveries in our quest for life in space. What is life and where can it exist? What searches are being made to identify conditions for life on other worlds? If extraterrestrial inhabited worlds are found, how can we explore them? Could humans survive beyond the Earth? In this book, two leading astrophysicists provide an engaging account of where we stand in our quest for habitable environments, in the Solar System and beyond. Starting from basic concepts, the narrative builds up scientifically, including more in-depth material as boxed additions to the main text. The authors recount fascinating recent discoveries, arising from space missions and from observations using ground-based telescopes, of possible life-related artefacts in Martian meteorites, of extrasolar planets, and of subsurface oceans on Europa, Titan and Enceladus. They also provide a forward look to exciting future missions, including the return to Venus, Mars and the Moon; further explorations of Pluto and Jupiter’s icy moons; and placing giant planet-seeking telescopes in orbit beyond Jupiter. showing how we approach the question of finding out whether the life that teems on our own planet is unique. This is an exciting, informative read for anyone interested in the search for habitable and inhabited planets, and makes an excellent primer for students keen to learn about astrobiology, habitability, planetary science and astronomy. -
Curriculum Vitae - 24 March 2020
Dr. Eric E. Mamajek Curriculum Vitae - 24 March 2020 Jet Propulsion Laboratory Phone: (818) 354-2153 4800 Oak Grove Drive FAX: (818) 393-4950 MS 321-162 [email protected] Pasadena, CA 91109-8099 https://science.jpl.nasa.gov/people/Mamajek/ Positions 2020- Discipline Program Manager - Exoplanets, Astro. & Physics Directorate, JPL/Caltech 2016- Deputy Program Chief Scientist, NASA Exoplanet Exploration Program, JPL/Caltech 2017- Professor of Physics & Astronomy (Research), University of Rochester 2016-2017 Visiting Professor, Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester 2016 Professor, Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester 2013-2016 Associate Professor, Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester 2011-2012 Associate Astronomer, NOAO, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory 2008-2013 Assistant Professor, Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester (on leave 2011-2012) 2004-2008 Clay Postdoctoral Fellow, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 2000-2004 Graduate Research Assistant, University of Arizona, Astronomy 1999-2000 Graduate Teaching Assistant, University of Arizona, Astronomy 1998-1999 J. William Fulbright Fellow, Australia, ADFA/UNSW School of Physics Languages English (native), Spanish (advanced) Education 2004 Ph.D. The University of Arizona, Astronomy 2001 M.S. The University of Arizona, Astronomy 2000 M.Sc. The University of New South Wales, ADFA, Physics 1998 B.S. The Pennsylvania State University, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Physics 1993 H.S. Bethel Park High School Research Interests Formation and Evolution -
Distribution of Nitrifying Bacteria Under Fluctuating Environmental Conditions
Distribution of Nitrifying Bacteria Under Fluctuating Environmental Conditions Joseph M. Battistelli Stratford, Connecticut B.S., Rutgers, the State Universi ty of New Jersey, New Brunswick Campus, 2002 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Environmental Sciences University of Virginia December, 2012 ii Abstract Engineered systems that mimic tidal wetlands are ideal for point-of-source treatment of wastewater due to their low energy requirements and small physical footprint. In this study, vertical columns were constructed to mimic the flood-and-drain cycles of tidal wetland treatment systems (TWTS) in order to study how variations in the frequency and duration of flooding affect the efficiency of microbially-mediated nitrogen + removal from synthetic wastewater (containing whey protein and NH 4 ). Altering the frequency of flooding, which determines the temporal juxtaposition of aerobic and anaerobic conditions in the reactor, had a significant effect on overall nitrogen removal; + columns more frequent cycling were very efficient at converting the NH4 in the feed to - - NO 3 . At a flooding frequency of 8-cycles per day, NO 3 began to disappear from the systems in both High- and Low - N treatments. The longer flooding duration appeared to increased anaerobiosis and allowed denitrification to proceed more effectively, while allowing nitrification to proceed when oxygen was available. Analysis of depth profiles of abundance revealed distinct differences between the tidal and trickling systems abundance profiles. Overall, these results demonstrate a tight coupling of environmental conditions with the abundance of ammonium oxidizing bacteria and suggest several experimental modifications, such variable tidal cycles, could be implemented to enhance the functioning of TWTS. -
Planets Transiting Non-Eclipsing Binaries
A&A 570, A91 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323112 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Planets transiting non-eclipsing binaries David V. Martin1 and Amaury H. M. J. Triaud2;? 1 Observatoire Astronomique de l’Université de Genève, Chemin des Maillettes 51, CH-1290 Sauverny, Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] 2 Kavli Institute for Astrophysics & Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Received 22 November 2013 / Accepted 28 August 2014 ABSTRACT The majority of binary stars do not eclipse. Current searches for transiting circumbinary planets concentrate on eclipsing binaries, and are therefore restricted to a small fraction of potential hosts. We investigate the concept of finding planets transiting non-eclipsing binaries, whose geometry would require mutually inclined planes. Using an N-body code we explore how the number and sequence of transits vary as functions of observing time and orbital parameters. The concept is then generalised thanks to a suite of simulated circumbinary systems. Binaries are constructed from radial-velocity surveys of the solar neighbourhood. They are then populated with orbiting gas giants, drawn from a range of distributions. The binary population is shown to be compatible with the Kepler eclipsing binary catalogue, indicating that the properties of binaries may be as universal as the initial mass function. These synthetic systems produce transiting circumbinary planets occurring on both eclipsing and non-eclipsing binaries. Simulated planets transiting eclipsing binaries are compared with published Kepler detections. We find 1) that planets transiting non-eclipsing binaries are probably present in the Kepler data; 2) that observational biases alone cannot account for the observed over-density of circumbinary planets near the stability limit, which implies a physical pile-up; and 3) that the distributions of gas giants orbiting single and binary stars are likely different. -
Exep Science Plan Appendix (SPA) (This Document)
ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 1 of 61 Created By: David A. Breda Date Program TDEM System Engineer Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Dr. Nick Siegler Date Program Chief Technologist Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Concurred By: Dr. Gary Blackwood Date Program Manager Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology EXOPDr.LANET Douglas Hudgins E XPLORATION PROGRAMDate Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program ScienceScience Plan Mission DirectorateAppendix NASA Headquarters Karl Stapelfeldt, Program Chief Scientist Eric Mamajek, Deputy Program Chief Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program JPL CL#19-0790 JPL Document No: 1735632 ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 2 of 61 Approved by: Dr. Gary Blackwood Date Program Manager, Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory Dr. Douglas Hudgins Date Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Science Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters Created by: Dr. Karl Stapelfeldt Chief Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Dr. Eric Mamajek Deputy Program Chief Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology This research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. © 2018 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Exoplanet Exploration Program JPL CL#19-0790 ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 3 of 61 Table of Contents 1. -
Astrobiologia E a Busca Científica De Vida Fora Da Terra
Astronomia ao Meio Dia – IAG-USP 05/10/2017 Astrobiologia e a busca científica de vida fora da Terra Fabio Rodrigues Instituto de Química - USP Núcleo de Pesquisa em Astrobiologia - USP [email protected] Vida Extraterrestre • Prêmio Guzman (1900): 100.000 francos oferecido pela Académie des sciences (França) para quem conseguisse estabelecer comunicação extraterrestre. Curiosidade: Em seu texto, o prêmio excluia explícitamente a comunicação com Marte, pois neste planeta era óbvio que havia vida!! Evolução das observações de Marte! Christiaan Huygens, 1659 Telescopic view, 1960s Giovanni Schiaparelli, 1888 Hubble Space Telescope, 1997 Mars Global Surveyor, 2002 Furo com 1,6 cm de diâmetro! Especulativa Experimental / observacional Foto obtida pelo Mars Science Laboratoy (Curiosity) em 12 de Maio de 2014! O que é astrobiologia? Não é uma nova disciplina, mas um novo enfoque a antigos temas Origem e evolução da vida Distribição da vida, na Terra e fora dela Futuro da vida O que é astrobiologia? Não é uma nova disciplina, mas um novo enfoque a antigos temas Astrobiólogo?? - Físicos, químicos, biólogos, astrônomos, geólogos, cientistas planetários, filósofos, etc. - Interessados nos problemas e com o enfoque proposto pela astrobiologia! Big Bang Estrelas e supernovas Formação dos elementos Big Bang Estrelas e supernovas Moléculas Formação dos elementos (Astroquímica) + + - + + + 2 átomos: AlO, C2, CH, CH , CN, CN , CN , CO, CO , CS, FeO, H2, HCl, HCl , HO, OH , KCl, NH, + + N2, NO, NO , NaCl, MgH , O2, PO, SH, SO, SiC, SiN, SiO, TiO etc. + + 3 átomos: AlOH, C3, C2H, C2O, C2P, CO2, H3 , H2C, H2O, H2O , HO2, H2S, HCN, HNC, HCO, + + HCO+, HCP, HNC, HN2 , MgCN, NH2, N2H , N2O, NaOH, O3, SO2, SiC2, SiCN, TiO2 etc. -
Exoplanet.Eu Catalog Page 1 # Name Mass Star Name
exoplanet.eu_catalog # name mass star_name star_distance star_mass OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L b 13.6 OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L 4500.0 0.048 11 Com b 19.4 11 Com 110.6 2.7 11 Oph b 21 11 Oph 145.0 0.0162 11 UMi b 10.5 11 UMi 119.5 1.8 14 And b 5.33 14 And 76.4 2.2 14 Her b 4.64 14 Her 18.1 0.9 16 Cyg B b 1.68 16 Cyg B 21.4 1.01 18 Del b 10.3 18 Del 73.1 2.3 1RXS 1609 b 14 1RXS1609 145.0 0.73 1SWASP J1407 b 20 1SWASP J1407 133.0 0.9 24 Sex b 1.99 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 24 Sex c 0.86 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 2M 0103-55 (AB) b 13 2M 0103-55 (AB) 47.2 0.4 2M 0122-24 b 20 2M 0122-24 36.0 0.4 2M 0219-39 b 13.9 2M 0219-39 39.4 0.11 2M 0441+23 b 7.5 2M 0441+23 140.0 0.02 2M 0746+20 b 30 2M 0746+20 12.2 0.12 2M 1207-39 24 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1207-39 b 4 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1938+46 b 1.9 2M 1938+46 0.6 2M 2140+16 b 20 2M 2140+16 25.0 0.08 2M 2206-20 b 30 2M 2206-20 26.7 0.13 2M 2236+4751 b 12.5 2M 2236+4751 63.0 0.6 2M J2126-81 b 13.3 TYC 9486-927-1 24.8 0.4 2MASS J11193254 AB 3.7 2MASS J11193254 AB 2MASS J1450-7841 A 40 2MASS J1450-7841 A 75.0 0.04 2MASS J1450-7841 B 40 2MASS J1450-7841 B 75.0 0.04 2MASS J2250+2325 b 30 2MASS J2250+2325 41.5 30 Ari B b 9.88 30 Ari B 39.4 1.22 38 Vir b 4.51 38 Vir 1.18 4 Uma b 7.1 4 Uma 78.5 1.234 42 Dra b 3.88 42 Dra 97.3 0.98 47 Uma b 2.53 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma c 0.54 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma d 1.64 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 51 Eri b 9.1 51 Eri 29.4 1.75 51 Peg b 0.47 51 Peg 14.7 1.11 55 Cnc b 0.84 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc c 0.1784 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc d 3.86 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc e 0.02547 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc f 0.1479 55 -
A Review on Substellar Objects Below the Deuterium Burning Mass Limit: Planets, Brown Dwarfs Or What?
geosciences Review A Review on Substellar Objects below the Deuterium Burning Mass Limit: Planets, Brown Dwarfs or What? José A. Caballero Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), ESAC, Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, E-28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain; [email protected] Received: 23 August 2018; Accepted: 10 September 2018; Published: 28 September 2018 Abstract: “Free-floating, non-deuterium-burning, substellar objects” are isolated bodies of a few Jupiter masses found in very young open clusters and associations, nearby young moving groups, and in the immediate vicinity of the Sun. They are neither brown dwarfs nor planets. In this paper, their nomenclature, history of discovery, sites of detection, formation mechanisms, and future directions of research are reviewed. Most free-floating, non-deuterium-burning, substellar objects share the same formation mechanism as low-mass stars and brown dwarfs, but there are still a few caveats, such as the value of the opacity mass limit, the minimum mass at which an isolated body can form via turbulent fragmentation from a cloud. The least massive free-floating substellar objects found to date have masses of about 0.004 Msol, but current and future surveys should aim at breaking this record. For that, we may need LSST, Euclid and WFIRST. Keywords: planetary systems; stars: brown dwarfs; stars: low mass; galaxy: solar neighborhood; galaxy: open clusters and associations 1. Introduction I can’t answer why (I’m not a gangstar) But I can tell you how (I’m not a flam star) We were born upside-down (I’m a star’s star) Born the wrong way ’round (I’m not a white star) I’m a blackstar, I’m not a gangstar I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar I’m not a pornstar, I’m not a wandering star I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar Blackstar, F (2016), David Bowie The tenth star of George van Biesbroeck’s catalogue of high, common, proper motion companions, vB 10, was from the end of the Second World War to the early 1980s, and had an entry on the least massive star known [1–3]. -
Exoplanet Meteorology: Characterizing the Atmospheres Of
Exoplanet Meteorology: Characterizing the Atmospheres of Directly Imaged Sub-Stellar Objects by Abhijith Rajan A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved April 2017 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Jennifer Patience, Co-Chair Patrick Young, Co-Chair Paul Scowen Nathaniel Butler Evgenya Shkolnik ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2017 ©2017 Abhijith Rajan All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT The field of exoplanet science has matured over the past two decades with over 3500 confirmed exoplanets. However, many fundamental questions regarding the composition, and formation mechanism remain unanswered. Atmospheres are a window into the properties of a planet, and spectroscopic studies can help resolve many of these questions. For the first part of my dissertation, I participated in two studies of the atmospheres of brown dwarfs to search for weather variations. To understand the evolution of weather on brown dwarfs we conducted a multi- epoch study monitoring four cool brown dwarfs to search for photometric variability. These cool brown dwarfs are predicted to have salt and sulfide clouds condensing in their upper atmosphere and we detected one high amplitude variable. Combining observations for all T5 and later brown dwarfs we note a possible correlation between variability and cloud opacity. For the second half of my thesis, I focused on characterizing the atmospheres of directly imaged exoplanets. In the first study Hubble Space Telescope data on HR8799, in wavelengths unobservable from the ground, provide constraints on the presence of clouds in the outer planets. Next, I present research done in collaboration with the Gemini Planet Imager Exoplanet Survey (GPIES) team including an exploration of the instrument contrast against environmental parameters, and an examination of the environment of the planet in the HD 106906 system. -
Vida En Otros Planetas Eduardo Battaner Universidad De Granada
Vida en otros planetas Eduardo Battaner Universidad de Granada Estudiantes de Física y Electrónica EFE. Vida. Granada, 2011 ¿Vida en otros planetas? ● Sólo tenemos una prueba observacional. ● No sabemos cómo se produce la vida. Muchas gracias EFE. Vida. Granada, 2011 Hay planetas extrasolares ● Se han descubierto unos 500. ● Técnicas: Observación directa, efecto Doppler, astrometría, tránsitos. ● Corot, Kepler, Darwin (>2014) (espectrometría de atmósferas de planetas terrestres). ● Pero tienen vida? EFE. Vida. Granada, 2011 Misión Darwin ● ESA, 2014 ● 3 telescopios de 3m en interferometría, mili arcsec. ● Situado en L2 ● Infrarrojo. La estrella brilla sólo 1 millón de veces más. ● La estrella se anula interferométricamente. ● Espectro IR, oxígeno? Agua? ● La fotosíntesis produce oxígeno en La Tierra. ● Aunque puede producirse por fotodisociación del CO2. EFE. Vida. Granada, 2011 EFE. Vida. Granada, 2011 Titan ● Descubierto por Huygens (1655) ● Tiene atmósfera, Comás Solá (1908), por medio de ocultación. ● Diámetro 2000 km. Temperatura 90K ● Atmósfera de nitrógeno (94%) y metano. ● Orbitador Cassini, Sonda Huygens (2005) ● Montañas, ríos y mares (metano), islas ● Guijarros de hielo EFE. Vida. Granada, 2011 Titán Hicrocarburos procedentes de disociación de CH4 ¿Cuál es la fuente de CH4? Vientos muy rápidos como en Venus Tormentas: Sánchez Lavega, con descargas bruscas de metano. El CH4 se filtra por el suelo. EFE. Vida. Granada, 2011 EFE. Vida. Granada, 2011 ● ¿Fórmula de Drake ? ● ¿ªZona de habitabilidadº? ● ¿Oparin y Haldane? ● ¿Experimento de Miller y Urey? ● ¿Panspermia? ● Paradoja de Fermi. ● La ausencia de evidencia ¿es la evidencia de la ausencia? EFE. Vida. Granada, 2011 Gliese 581g ● Catálogo de Wilhelm Gliese (1957) < 25 pc ● Gliese 581 es de tipo M2 (-31ë , -12ë), 37 días. -
Goldilocks Planet
Not too hot, not too cold: New Earth-like planet could sustain life By Steve Connor 2:07 PM Thursday Sep 30, 2010 Gliese 581g is a prime spot for the potential existence of extraterrestrial life, scientists say. Photo / AP The search for a faraway planet that could support life has found the most promising candidate to date, in the form of a distant world some 193,000 billion kilometres away from Earth. Scientists believe that the planet is made of rock, like the Earth, and sits in the "Goldilocks zone" of its sun, where it is neither too hot nor too cold for water to exist in liquid form - widely believed to be an essential precondition for life to evolve. It is unlikely that anyone would be able to visit planet Gliese 581g in the near future as it would take 20 years travelling at the speed of light to reach it, and many thousands of years in a spacecraft built using the best-available rocket technology. The planet is named after its star, Gliese 581, a red dwarf found in the constellation Libra, and is the sixth planet in its solar system. Scientists said last night that it is the most habitable planet yet found beyond our own Solar System, and a prime spot for the possible existence of extraterrestrial life. Two previous claims for the existence of earth-like planets in the same solar system were subsequently found to be overstated in that they were either too far away or too near to Gliese 581, making it too cold or too hot for liquid water and life to exist.