MINERAGRAPHIC IDENTIFICATION OF PSILO- MELANE AND MANGANITE1

S. R. B. Coore,2 WannBN Hownss eNn Ar.neN H. Eurnva

In the course of some recent mineragraphic work on the man- ganiferous iron of the Cuyuna Range, Minnesota, undertaken by the Mississippi Valley Experiment Station of the United States Bureau of Mines in cooperation with the Missouri School of Mines and Metallurgy, Rolla, Missouri, it was necessaryto make quick identification of the various oxides ol iron and . Hem- atite and psilomelanewere found to be the predominating , although the occurrence of and was impor- tant to the problem in hand. The mineragraphic characteristics of these four minerals are shown in Table 1. Pyrolusite can be readily distinguished from the other minerals on the basis of its luster, color, surface characteristics and hard- ness.The pitted surface of the and its creamy white color usually serve to make its identification positive. Psilomelane and manganite jointly can be distinguished from the hematite and py- rolusite, but difficulty was encountered in this investigation in vis- ually distinguishing between the two. Psilomelane pseudomorphs after manganite were often confusing. Although the hardness and reactions with HNOa and HCI are apparently diagnostic, the results in practice were not distinctive enough to permit certain identifi- cation at all times. The action of other etchants was therefore studied. The results are shown in Table 2.

I This paper has resulted from cooperative work between the U. S. Bureau of Mines and the Missouri School of Mines and Metallurgy, Rolla, Missouri' Pub- Iished by permission of the Director, U. S. Bureau of Mines. (Not subject to copy- right). 2 Graduate Research Student, Missouri School of Mines and Metallurgy, Rolla, Missouri. s Assistant Research Metallurgist, Missouri School of Mines and Metallurgy, Rolla, Missouri. a Geologist and Assistant to Chief Eirgineer, Experiment Stations Division, U. S. Bureau of Mines, Washington, D.C. 209 2IO THE AMEKICAN MINERALOGIST

T.rsre I Mrwrnecnapgrc Cn,nacrrrrsrrcs ol Salcner Mrxtner,s

Characteristics Hematite Psi.lomelane Manganite Pyrol,usi.te

Bright, between Bright, but lesr Bright when Luster Bright hematite and than hematite well polished psilomelane

Brown when not well polished; Color Creamy white Gray Gray Sray with good polish

Rough; some Muchrelief,con- specimensvery Surface Smooth Smooth siderable pitting difficult to polish

Hardness 5.5to 6.5,brittle 5 to 6, brittle i 2 to 2.5

Pitted, irregula Radiating Varied, Structure Varied sorne gralns needles times banded

Iarnishes; rubs HNOa Negative Negative nearly clean Negative

farnishes; rubr arnishes; rubs HCI Negative Negative faint brown pale

zU per, cent so- lution - nega- KCN Negative Negative Negative a tive; dilute - rapid tarnish Fi

FeCls Negative Negative Negative ,hes dark ; rubs pale TOURNAL MINERALOGICAL SOCIETV OF AMERICA 211

Taer,e If ErcgrNo ol Hnuarrrr, PsnouuANr, Mnmcnnrrn lso Pvnor-surre

Efect oJ Reagent on Reagent Hem.otite Psilomel.one Manganite PyrolusiLe

)arkens,with Darkens very H2SOB(6_8per cent Darkens rapid- Negative iorbitic pat- slightly with SOz) ty;deeplyetched tern long contact

iimilar to a Equal volumes of bove but HNO3,H2Os,H2O do do do much more used cold rapid

FeSOr'(NHr)zSOr (0.3N) Darkens do do do 10 per cent H2SOr rapidly used hot

Accentuates HF do do do cracks

Becauseof its moderate rate of attack and characteristicetch pattern on psilomelane, sulphurous acid is recommended as a dis- tinguishing etching reagent to those desiring to differentiate rap- idly between the manganeseminerals. Figs. 1 and 2 are photographs of the same field in a polished sec- tion of a briquet containing hematite, psilomelane, manganite, and pyrolusite.The specimenin Fig. 1 wasunetched, but in Fig. 2 it was etched for 90 secondsin a solution of 8 per cent sulphurous acid. Comparison between the two figures showsthat the hematite and manganite are unattacked, the psilomelane is darkened with a spotted or sorbitic pattern, and the pyrolusite is blackened. The etch readily brings out the componentsof the mixed grains. The true nature of the grain of psilomelane pseudomorphic after manganite [Ps(a)] is also shown. Sulphurous acid is a very convenient etching reagent for dif- ferentiating between manganeseminerals, especially in ores where pseudomorphismis encountered. 212 TH E AMERICAN MI NERAI.OGIST

Frc. 1. Unetched.Magnification 50 x.

Frc. 2. Iitched for 90 seconds in HzSOa. Magnification 50 x. Legend: B :bakelite matrix; P :pyrolusite; ps:psilomelane; M :manganite; H :hematite; Ps(a) :psilomelane pseudomorphic af ter manganite