DOCSLIB.ORG

Kiust .&Ll•Salongen. Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kiust .&Ll•Salongen. Program KIUST.&LL•SALONGEN. PROGRAM: Löl'd.agen den 8 Augustt 1896. hpellmüt&rt: Re!T OJm. DAtrBI. ·10. 2.ac, •• JIS,1 :I. • 1:· lntAga-Mal'llCI} ....................... , .............. ·crnu~" 2. Onverture till ,Mnritana, .. ........................ \\"11.lliwe. 1:! The 5 Sisters W:interburn, 1);.rn~arti:-;.li-r. ., lle ftuomrpn], 111l,1hl.:1 liladi:1torrrPa l., 1 ROSARIO & RAFAEL. 1i. BrödermanaJr.a. Opera.kvartetton. • Pro.r. 1\11:C>R.J:EU.:X:. • 1.-,. fr:un•t,illnu,~ ,if el,·Lln•l-1 W JAttoJXJ.ill.nt.nsa.r.._ "~''" Dr fritbiof Nan11111 Nordpol.ditcl. f<inud.linc1bllder. 1 ld 1 ti. rLUh 1UlAU"""1-I Bumoriatit• f:lt,•. l" lc. ! E:C5A.MrCnsAWAR& \ ~Vnil-lf i, ro Kristall-Salongen, Stockholm, advertisement (BAN 143 5/r 12) JANELLE BLANKENSHIP » Leuchte der Kultur« - lmperialism, Imaginary Travel and the Skladanowsky Welt-Theater In his unfinished Passagen-Werk, Walter Benjamin writes that Daguerre's dio­ rama gradually effaced or replaced magic lantern projection in the 19'h cen­ tury.' This seems to be a false, rather hasty assumption; in reality, dissolving views - the final stage of magic lantern projection, using the sciopticon, bi­ unial, or even tri-unial lantern - flourished alongside the Kaiserpanorama and early cinema at the previous turn-of-the-century, often preceding or follow­ ing the presentation of ,living pictures<. Nowhere is this balancing act better documented than in the eclectic variety the.ater programs or broadsides weil preserved in the German Federal Archives, above all in the records that pertain to the showmen Max and Emil Skladanowsky, who first exhibited their spec­ tacle of circus attraction moving pictures in Berlin in 1895. Of course, it was not cinema, but the Nebelbilder lantern career of Carl Skladanowsky & Sons which was the real family business.2 Even after their debut with their Bioscop dual projector, Max and Emil Skladanowsky still included the magic lantern within their variety theater number as a successful stock act. This double billing, living pictures and magic lantern, is enumerated in a program for the Kristall-Salongen Variety Theater Tivoli (Stockholm), dated August 8, 1896.J Nine months after their Wintergartenprogramm debut of cir­ cus act cinema in Berlin, the popularity of the Bioscop dual projector is already waning. As the novelty of the Bioscop fades, Max and Emil Skladanowsky fall back on their familiar repertoire of Nebelbilder. In act one of the Tivoli program the brothers appear with their dual projector and loop films or »liv­ ing pictures«: dancers, wresders, the »boxing kangaroo«, etc. The art nouveau program page, like the stage, · is resplendent with an overwhelming number of visual curiosities, a flood of advertisements for whisky, clothing, and pho­ tography. Arrows scribbled in pencil on the archival program highlight for a discerning eye the important sensation of the Bioscop. Yet it is precisely what is hidden or not >pointed out< to the researcher that is of greatest importance. In act I 5 of the variety theater program the brothers reappear under Swedish alias as »Professor Morieux« to present another electric attraction, a dissolv­ ing view presentation of chromatropes, comic slides, and a spectacular current event, Dr. Nansen's expedition to the North Pole: »Framställning af elektriska [ ... ] Dr. Frithjof Nansens Nordpolsfärd. Förvandlingsbilder.« 4 The Tivoli 37 program thus documents not only the importance of invention or novelty to the cinema of attractions; it also attests to the momentary decline of film in the face of the forceful persistence of older lantern themes, showmanship guises and magical >tricknologies<. lt is all too easy to read media history as a strict linear evolution of old and new, agame of substitution and Aufhebung. But a closer analysis of the Tivoli program highlights the uneven temporality of ear­ ly cinema, with its competing stages of attraction. Should we see the dissolving view practice of C. Skladanowsky & Sons only as a curious techno-predeces­ sor to the even more curious projector of the Bioscop, that dark machine of 1895 that suddenly set free the specters of the 19'h century, paving the way for a new entertainment industry and a new mode of perception? Questioning the teleology that places the Skladanowsky dual projector as the logical outcome or revision of the magic lantern, let us reverse the terms, viewing the dissolv­ ing view program of C. Skladanowsky & Sons not as >pre-cinema<, but as ,late magic<, as a perfected visual display that at the height of its powers made peo­ ple think, dream and look.S Through the magical enlarging lens, spectators of the Skladanowsky Welt­ Theater or Original-Riesen-Welt-Tableaux6 could catch glimpses of new colo­ nial dominions, solar eclipses (»Die Sonnenfinsternis am 19. August 1887«), the heavens (»Bilder aus der Sternenwelt«), the cartography of America and the new world, China, India, the King's Castles (» Königs-Phantasien, Prachtschlößer König Ludwigs II. von Bayern«), Dutch windmills, the Eisen­ bahn, ornithocopter, or hot air balloon. In Prague, the imperial travels of bis royal highness Franz Ferdinand were also thrown up on the screen.7 Fantastic travels and the newest scientific marvels and technological wonders, such as the X-ray or the Eiffel tower display at the 1889 World's Fair, were catalogued alongside other sensational »media events«.8 The broadsides for the first Nebelbildervorstellung in the Berlin Flora in November, 1879 already claimed that the Skladanowsky »Welt-Diophra­ ma« [sie] boasted »the greatest sightseeing of the earth from the north to the south.«9 An act highlighting »out-standing German men and women in past and present« was also part of this lantern exhibition. In 18 82, a patriotic tone was again set for the world theater, with a final act entitled »Deutschlands Ruhmeshalle«. '0 Anticipating the Kaiser's Kintop, the magic lantern of C. Skla­ danowsky & Sons over time became more actively involved in documenting world affairs and projecting images of the monumental glory of the German Empire, presenting the public with sensational programs on »Weiland Kaiser Wilhelm I in Berlin«, »Weiland Kaiser Friedrich III von Deutschland« (1889), and »Berlin während der Kaiserillumination«." The importance of Tagespolitik to the geo-political »worlding« (Gayatri Spivak) of the Skladanowsky dissolving view lantern repertoire is indeed wor­ thy of closer analysis, as this dissolving view theater aspired to uphold and advertise the tenants of late 19'h century imperial modernity. lt is all the more important to shed light on the connections between nationalism and show­ manship, since the creation of a Skladanowsky archive by Max Skladanowsky himself was part and parcel of National-Socialist film historiography and politics. For example, on the thirty-year >anniversary< of the German Win­ tergartenprogramm, the Skladanowsky 1895 living pictures were screened alongside Leni Riefenstahl's TRIUMPH DES WILLENS, in German cities such as Stuttgart." To date, researchers have remained remarkably silent on the project of commemorating the 1895 Wintergartenprogramm during the Third Reich. In this context, the phrase »Skladanowsky travels« also receives new meaning. Max Skladanowsky's touring archival presentations in the 1930s included not only earlier lantern slides but also an anti-Semitic parody of the Wandering ]ew, one of his Projektion für Alle! flip-books.' 1 lt seems fitting, then, to shift our attention away from the inventor's argument (Skladanowsky vs. Messter) and instead focus on the cultural and political implications of what it means to archive, specifically what it means to insert Germany into an image archive as Welt-Theater. During the Spanish-American War early cinematic apparatuses battling for economic dominance in the United States were transformed, almost overnight, into » War-Graphs« what scholars of >pre-cinema< and early cinema have ter­ med »signifying war machines«.' 4 Yet already in the 1890s in US magic lantern projection there were presentations that filled a similar function: »Our New Possessions: The Philippines, The Ladrones, Hawaii and Puerto Rico«, and »Free Cuba«. In concluding his study The Emergence of Cinema: The Ame­ rican Screen to 1907, Charles Musser gives us pause to reflect on the imperial fantasies of power that resonated with audiences in the darkened hall of the theater: [During the Spanish-American War] cinema had found a role beyond narrow amu­ sement, and this sudden prominence coincided with a new era of overseas expan­ sion and military intervention. Who can say what fantasies of power audiences experienced in those darkened halls, and how these emotions continued to resonate outside the theater?11 In Germany as weil, prior to colonial cinema and the cinematic >war-graph,, the Welt-Theater of C. Skladanowsky & Sons, in addition to displaying chroma­ trope color wheels, fairy tales, solar eclipses and new technological triumphs, also documented colonial battles, ethnographic spectacles, and the empire­ building extensions of the German Reich. As we read in the surviving broad­ sides and lectures, close attention in Skladanowsky lantern shows was often paid to the exotic spectacle of the racialized body and the Western encounter with the >primitive< Other.'6 Even within European borders, there was in the late 19•h century a craze for uncharted territory,'7 accompanied by a racializing gaze. On this point, consider the spoken commentary for the presentation »Der Kampf um den Nordpol«. In the surviving lecture, there is a curious 39 shift in narrative perspective and identification from the J'd person »sie« of the adventurer or Polarforscher to the 1" person »we« of anthropological know­ ledge that classifies and measures its object. What becomes obvious is not only the importance of aesthestics to racial theories, but also the proliferation of discourses on ,dying races< within imperial anthropology: Im äußersten Norden Europas treffen wir auf einen eigenartigen Menschenschlag, die Lappen, deren Heimat das nordische Skandinavien ist, und die von Genera­ tion zu Generation im Aussterben begriffen sind.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moving Pictures: the History of Early Cinema by Brian Manley
    Discovery Guides Moving Pictures: The History of Early Cinema By Brian Manley Introduction The history of film cannot be credited to one individual as an oversimplification of any his- tory often tries to do. Each inventor added to the progress of other inventors, culminating in progress for the entire art and industry. Often masked in mystery and fable, the beginnings of film and the silent era of motion pictures are usually marked by a stigma of crudeness and naiveté, both on the audience's and filmmakers' parts. However, with the landmark depiction of a train hurtling toward and past the camera, the Lumière Brothers’ 1895 picture “La Sortie de l’Usine Lumière à Lyon” (“Workers Leaving the Lumière Factory”), was only one of a series of simultaneous artistic and technological breakthroughs that began to culminate at the end of the nineteenth century. These triumphs that began with the creation of a machine that captured moving images led to one of the most celebrated and distinctive art forms at the start of the 20th century. Audiences had already reveled in Magic Lantern, 1818, Musée des Arts et Métiers motion pictures through clever uses of slides http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Magic-lantern.jpg and mechanisms creating "moving photographs" with such 16th-century inventions as magic lanterns. These basic concepts, combined with trial and error and the desire of audiences across the world to see entertainment projected onto a large screen in front of them, birthed the movies. From the “actualities” of penny arcades, the idea of telling a story in order to draw larger crowds through the use of differing scenes began to formulate in the minds of early pioneers such as Georges Melies and Edwin S.
    [Show full text]
  • Leuchte Der Kultur« - Imperialism, Imaginary Travel and the Skladanowsky Welt-Theater 2006
    Repositorium für die Medienwissenschaft Janelle Blankenship »Leuchte der Kultur« - Imperialism, Imaginary Travel and the Skladanowsky Welt-Theater 2006 https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/16033 Veröffentlichungsversion / published version Sammelbandbeitrag / collection article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Blankenship, Janelle: »Leuchte der Kultur« - Imperialism, Imaginary Travel and the Skladanowsky Welt-Theater. In: Frank Kessler, Sabine Lenk, Martin Loiperdinger (Hg.): Quellen und Perspektiven / Sources and Perspectives. Frankfurt am Main: Stroemfeld/Roter Stern 2006 (KINtop. Jahrbuch zur Erforschung des frühen Films 14/15), S. 36– 51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/16033. Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Creative Commons - This document is made available under a creative commons - Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0/ Attribution - Share Alike 4.0/ License. For more information see: Lizenz zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu dieser Lizenz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ finden Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ KIUST.&LL•SALONGEN. PROGRAM: Löl'd.agen den 8 Augustt 1896. hpellmüt&rt: Re!T OJm. DAtrBI. ·10. 2.ac, •• JIS,1 :I. • 1:· lntAga-Mal'llCI} ....................... , .............. ·crnu~" 2. Onverture till ,Mnritana, .. ........................ \\"11.lliwe. 1:! The 5 Sisters W:interburn, 1);.rn~arti:-;.li-r. ., lle ftuomrpn], 111l,1hl.:1 liladi:1torrrPa l., 1 ROSARIO & RAFAEL. 1i. BrödermanaJr.a. Opera.kvartetton. • Pro.r. 1\11:C>R.J:EU.:X:. • 1.-,. fr:un•t,illnu,~ ,if el,·Lln•l-1 W JAttoJXJ.ill.nt.nsa.r.._ "~''" Dr fritbiof Nan11111 Nordpol.ditcl. f<inud.linc1bllder. 1 ld 1 ti. rLUh 1UlAU"""1-I Bumoriatit• f:lt,•.
    [Show full text]
  • Innenseite Von Max Skladanowskys Kofferdeckel
    Innenseite von Max Skladanowskys Kofferdeckel 122 HAUKE LANGE-FUCHS Die Reisen des Projektionskunst­ Unternehmens Skladanowsky InK!Ntop 8 macht Ludwig Vogl-Bienek 1 auf die oft übersehene Tätigkeit der Familie Skladanowsky als Nebelbilder-Vorführer aufmerksam. Diese ist für die Filmgeschichtsschreibung allein schon deshalb bedeutsam, weil die im 19. Jahrhundert hoch entwickelte Projektionstechnik dieser Vorführungen mit Doppelprojektoren erklärt, warum sich Max Skladanowsky für die Ent­ wicklung eines Film-Doppelprojektors entschied, was Filmhistoriker mit­ unter noch immer als Irrweg abtun. Die Filmgeschichte beginnt nicht mit dem Siegeszug von Ein-Linsen-Projektoren im Jahr 1895. Aus guten Grün• den haben viele Filmpioniere - wie etwa Louis Aime Augustin Le Prince, William Friese Greene, Birt Acres und auch die Gebrüder Louis und Auguste Lumiere - mit Doppel- oder Mehrlinsensystemen experimentiert. Die Skla­ danowskys benutzten für ihre Nebelbildervorführungen Doppel- und Drei­ linsenprojektoren. Sie waren als Projektionskünstler auf der Höhe der Tech­ nik ihrer Zeit und projizierten sogar mit bis zu acht Projektoren gleichzeitig - gewissermaßen als Vorläufer moderner Multi-Media-Shows. 2 Die Verwen­ dung von Filmprojektoren mit nur einer Linse war 189 5 keine Selbstverständ• lichkeit. Sie konnte sogar als Rückschritt erscheinen. Mit Recht verweist Vogl-Bienek als erfahrener Projektionist auf die Vorzüge der Doppelprojek­ tion: flimmerfreie Überblendung und höhere Lichtausbeute (welche den Skla­ danowskys eine Projektion auf eine gut dreimal größere Leinwandfläche im Vergleich zu den Brüdern Lumiere ermöglichte). Von Vogl-Bienek erfahren wir auch etwas über die Nebelbilder, welche die Skladanowskys vorführten. Selbst Joachim Castans Monographie zu Max Skladanowsky behandelt die langjährigen Laterna magica-Vorführungen der Familie nur en passant.3 Vogl-Bienek stützt sich auf die in dem fragmentari­ schen Nachlaß im Bundesarchiv erhaltenen Nebelbilder.4 Hier finden sich auch Programmzettel, die fast zwei Jahrzehnte an Nebelbilderaufführungen umspannen.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 1
    THE PROMISE OF CINEMA GERMAN FILM THEORY 1907–1933 EDITED BY ANTON KAES, NICHOLAS BAER, AND MICHAEL COWAN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu. University of California Press Oakland, California © 2016 by The Regents of the University of California For credits, permissions, and acknowledgments, please see page 639. The editors and publisher are grateful to the copyright owners for permission to republish material in this book. Despite great efforts, it has not been possible in every case to locate all rights holders and estates. The editors and publisher apologize in advance for any unintended errors and omissions, which they will seek to correct in future printing. Please address all inquiries to: University of California Press, 155 Grand Avenue, Suite 400, Oakland, California 94612. library of congress cataloging-in-publication data Names: Kaes, Anton, editor. | Baer, Nicholas, 1985–editor. | Cowan, Michael J., 1971–editor. Title: The promise of cinema: German fi lm theory, 1907–1933 / edited by Anton Kaes, Nicholas Baer, Michael Cowan. Other titles: Weimar and now ; 49. Description: Oakland, California : University of California Press, [2016]. | “2016 | Series: Weimar and now: German cultural criticism ; 49 | Includes bibliographical reference. Identifi ers: lccn 2015049570| isbn 9780520219076 (cloth : alk. paper) | isbn 9780520219083 (pbk. : alk. paper) | isbn 9780520962439 (ebook). Subjects: lcsh: Motion pictures—Germany—History—20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Medial Visuality in the Contemporary Indian English Novel
    THE POETICS OF THE REAL AND AESTHETICS OF THE REEL ― MEDIAL VISUALITY IN THE CONTEMPORARY INDIAN ENGLISH NOVEL Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) vorgelegt der Philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Potsdam von Anna Maria Reimer POTSDAM 2015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License: Attribution – Noncommercial – Share Alike 4.0 International To view a copy of this license visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Published online at the Institutional Repository of the University of Potsdam: URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-95660 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-95660 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. A passage beyond ― writing India now ............................................................................. 3 1.1 Envisioned Pasts ― Imag(in)ed Futures .................................................................. 11 2. Trac(k)ing the real ................................................................................................................. 18 2.1 Aesthetics and poetics in an Indian perspective ..................................................... 28 2.2 An analytical sketch ..................................................................................................... 33 3. No God in Sight ..................................................................................................................... 42 3.1 Memento India ............................................................................................................. 48 3.2 Spec(tac)ularizing
    [Show full text]
  • Cinematic Histospheres on the Theory and Practice of Historical Films Rasmus Greiner Cinematic Histospheres Rasmus Greiner Cinematic Histospheres
    Cinematic Histospheres On the Theory and Practice of Historical Films Rasmus Greiner Cinematic Histospheres Rasmus Greiner Cinematic Histospheres On the Theory and Practice of Historical Films Dr. Rasmus Greiner Inst. f. Kunstwissenschaft – Filmwissenschaft – Kunstpädagogik Universität Bremen Bremen, Germany SKY WITHOUT STARS: neue deutsche Filmgesellschaft mbH / Beta Film, screenshots (cover, 1.1–1.4, 2.1–2.6, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1–4.4, 5.2–5.15, 6.1–6.8, 7.5)—KU’DAMM 56: UFA Fiction GmbH, screenshots (2.7-2.10, 3.3-3.7, 5.1, 5.16, 5.17, 5.19–5.23, 6.11–6.18, 8.1)—YEARS OF HUNGER: Jutta Brückner-Filmproduktion / ZDF, screenshots (2.11–2.16, 6.9, 6.10, 7.3, 7.6) – Berlin 1967: Manfred Niermann, Commons Wikimedia CC-BY-SA-4.0 (5.18)—THE PIANO: Jan Chapman Production, screenshots (7.1, 7.2)—THE RULES OF THE GAME: Nouvelle Édition Française, screenshot (7.4) ISBN 978-3-030-70589-3 ISBN 978-3-030-70590-9 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70590-9 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2021. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly 1 · 2008
    German Films Quarterly 1 · 2008 AT BERLIN in Competition FEUERHERZ by Luigi Falorni KIRSCHBLUETEN – HANAMI by Doris Doerrie PORTRAITS Leander Haussmann, Ute Wieland, Corazón International, Hannah Herzsprung SPECIAL REPORT Silent Cinema German Films Quarterly 1 · 2008 4 focus on SILENT CINEMA directors’ portraits 16 A GOOD LAUGH GOES A LONG WAY A portrait of Leander Haussmann 18 COMING FULL CIRCLE A portrait of Ute Wieland producers’ portrait 20 ONES FOR THE HEART A portrait of Corazón International actress’ portrait 22 “I JUST WANT TO ACT” A portrait of Hannah Herzsprung 24 news in production 28 7 ODER WARUM ICH AUF DER WELT BIN Antje Starost, Hans-Helmut Grotjahn 28 EFFI Hermine Huntgeburth 29 ENTSORGTE VAETER Douglas Wolfsperger 30 GANZ NAH BEI DIR Almut Getto 31 JOHN RABE Florian Gallenberger 32 KAIFECK MURDER Esther Gronenborn 33 KRONOS Olav F. Wehling 33 LIEBESLIED Anne Hoegh Krohn 34 MEIN VATER, MEIN ONKEL Christoph Heller 35 MITTE ENDE AUGUST Sebastian Schipper 36 DER MOND UND ANDERE LIEBHABER Bernd Boehlich 37 MR NOBODY Jaco van Dormael 38 PHANTOMSCHMERZ Matthias Emcke 39 ROBERT ZIMMERMANN WUNDERT SICH UEBER DIE LIEBE Leander Haussmann 40 SANKT PAULI – AUFBRUCH IN DEN SUEDEN Joachim Bornemann 41 ZWEIER OHNE Jobst Christian Oetzmann 42 ZWERG NASE Felicitas Darschin new german films 44 ABSURDISTAN Veit Helmer 45 APHRODITES NACHT APHRODITE’S NIGHT Carolin Otto 46 AUF DER STRECKE ON THE LINE Reto Caffi 47 BEAUTIFUL BITCH Theo Martin Krieger 48 BERLIN – 1. MAI BERLIN – 1ST OF MAY Carsten Ludwig, Jan-Christoph Glaser, Sven Taddicken,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Serpentine Dance: Inter-National
    1 Serpentine Dance: Inter-National Connections in Early Cinema by Deac Rossell (Text for the Honorary Research Fellow Lecture given at Goldsmith’s College, University of London, 27 October 1998, and later published under the above title as Occasional Papers in Modern Languages, Culture and Society, Issue No. 1, May 1999, by the Department of European Languages, Goldsmiths College, University of London.) For the past hundred years, the history of the invention of moving pictures has been told, in both scholarly and popular works, almost exclusively from a nationalist perspective. For the Germans, it was Max Skladanowsky, the first inventor to give a public performance of moving pictures to a paying audience in Europe, at the Wintergarten Theatre on November 1, 1895, who was the true inventor of the cinema. The French have always chosen a different date for this important European event, namely December 28, 1895, when the brothers August and Louis Lumière began public exhibitions of their Cinématographe in the cellar of the Grand Café on the Boulevard des Capucines, at the corner of the rue Auber in Paris. To the French, it is only the extraordinary dissemination of the Lumière Cinématographe, which reached six continents over the next year, that established moving pictures as a new medium. Not to be outdone by the Continent, the British produced a major theatrical film about their candidate for the role of true inventor of the movies, William Friese-Greene, most of whose interesting work was done in the period between 1893 and 1895. The Magic Box, made in 1951 for the Festival of Britain, is in fact quite a fine film, notwithstanding that in portraying the work of Friese-Greene it chose as its central figure someone whose work was decisively discredited later in the 1950s by the historian Brian Coe.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrocellulose from Gun-Cotton to Early Cinema by Deac Rossell Version: 6 June 2000
    Exploding Teeth, Unbreakable Sheets and Continuous Casting: Nitrocellulose from Gun-cotton to Early Cinema by Deac Rossell version: 6 June 2000 [Originally a lecture given at the Congress of the Fédération International des Archivs du Film, June 2-7, 2000 during their symposium “And God Created Nitrate....”, at the British Film Institute, London. Then published (with revisions) in This Film Is Dangerous!, ed. Roger Smither and Carol Surowiec (Brussels, 2002: International Federation of Film Archives [FIAF]). Text version before FIAF editing for publication.] I: The Origins of Celluloid The origins of celluloid lie in the discovery of a method of nitrating cellulose fibres, or, in plain words, soaking cellulose fibres, usually taken from cotton or wood or one of their many products, in nitric acid and adding any one of a number of solvents. This process was first experimentally investigated in the 1830s and 1840s, and led directly to the formation of the field of organic chemistry, the combination of naturally-occurring materials with a solvent or catalyst to produce synthetic materials that do not appear in nature and which have a wide variety of different properties. Two pioneering French scientists conducted experiments in the 1830s which in themselves were only hesitant steps towards the formation of a practical discipline of organic compounds, but which bequeathed the names of their experimental materials to the later history of celluloid manufacture. Henri Bracconot combined nitric acid and potato starch into a material he called “xyloidine” in 1833, and Théophile-Jules Pelouzé used nitric acid and paper to make a material he called “pyroxyline” in 1838.1 The first scientist to generate a useful material by combining nitric acid and cellulose, in the form of cotton, was Christian Friedrich Schönbein, a professor at the University of Basle.
    [Show full text]
  • Titel Kino 2/2002
    EXPORT-UNION OF GERMAN CINEMA 2/2002 AT CANNES in Competition RUSSIAN ARK by Alexander Sokurov in Un Certain Regard TEN MINUTES OLDER by Werner Herzog, Wim Wenders, et al GERMAN FILM AWARD … and the nominees are … SPECIAL REPORT Animation – Made in Germany Kino oduction) Charles Esten in Wim Wender’s episode of ”Ten Minutes Older“ episode of ”Ten Wender’s Wim Charles Esten in (an Odyssey Film London, Pr & Road Movies Matador Pictures GERMAN CINEMA German Films IN THE in Competition Russian Ark (Germany/Russia) by Alexander Sokurov World Sales: Celluloid Dreams, Paris/France phone +33-1-49 70 03 70 fax +33-1-49 70 03 71 in Competition The Man Without a Past (Finland/Germany/France) by Aki Kaurismaeki German co-producer: Pandora Film, Cologne/Germany phone +49-2 21-97 33 20 fax +49-2 21-97 33 29 World Sales: Bavaria Film International, Geiselgasteig/Germany phone +49-89-64 99 26 86 fax +49-89-64 99 37 20 in Competition The Pianist (Germany/France/Poland/United Kingdom) by Roman Polanski German co-producer: Studio Babelsberg, Potsdam/Germany phone +49-3 31-7 21 30 01 fax +49-3 31-7 21 25 25 in Competition Sweet Sixteen (United Kingdom/Germany/Spain) by Ken Loach German co-producer: Road Movies, Berlin/Germany phone +49-30-8 80 48 60 fax +49-30-88 04 86 11 OFFICIAL PROGRAM OF THE Cannes Festival in Un Certain Regard Ten Minutes Older by By Aki Kaurismaeki, Víctor Erice, Werner Herzog, Jim Jarmusch, Wim Wenders, Spike Lee, Chen Kaige, et al World Sales: Road Sales, Berlin/Germany phone +49-30-8 80 48 60 fax +49-30-88 04 86 11 in Directors’
    [Show full text]
  • FILM AFTER NEW MEDIA by MARGIT GRIEB a DISSERTATION
    TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE (SILVER) SCREEN: FILM AFTER NEW MEDIA By MARGIT GRIEB A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2003 Copyright 2003 by Margit Grieb For Don ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my dissertation committee chair, Prof. Nora M. Alter, for providing me with many invaluable years of mentoring and diligent assistance and guidance in every stage of this dissertation. It was her remarkable scholarly expertise that guided my first steps into academic research and her encouragement and knowledge that helped me continue with my studies. I also thank the other members of my committee, Prof. Keith Bullivant, Prof. Franz Futterknecht, and Prof. Gregory Ulmer, for their valuable comments and suggestions. A special note of thanks goes to Prof. Ulmer for sharing with me his creative and insightful perspective on issues concerning new media. I am also grateful to the Department of Germanic and Slavic Studies for providing me with many years of financial and intellectual support. I owe special gratitude to the members of the departmental office staff, Sophia Kurzweg and Annemarie Sykes, who have contributed in many ways to making my life as a graduate student more bearable. Many thanks go also to my friends Yves Clemmen and Will Lehman for patiently listening to my ideas and providing constructive criticism. Most of all, I am grateful to Don Wilder, without whom I never may have developed the interest in technology which served as the foundation for this project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of Cinema, 1894 - 1901
    First Light The Birth of Cinema, 1894 - 1901 Wednesday, November 16, 2011 Northwest Film Forum Presented by The Sprocket Society Seattle, WA Due to circumstances beyond our control, the films of Max Skladanowsky will not be shown this evening as had been previously announced. We deeply regret this change to the program, and the omission of these historically important films. All films this evening are presented from 16mm prints. Titles [in brackets] are provisional, attributed to films with no known official title. Thomas A. Edison began thinking about the development of motion pictures in 1888 after studying the successful motion-sequence still photographic experiments of Eadweard Muybridge and Étienne-Jules Marey. By early 1889, Edison had conceived the ambitious notion that it must be possible to record motion as perceived by the human eye and play it back in real time. His idea was to go beyond his predecessors, who had adapted the existing photographic equipment of the day to record brief sequences of motion, and invent an entirely new technology to do “for the eye what the phonograph does for the ear.” To turn his new invention into reality, Edison assigned responsibility for day-to-day development to one of his best assistants, a young Englishman named W. K. L. Dickson. By June of 1891, Dickson produced a series of successful experimental motion pictures that were shown to visiting groups at the Edison laboratory in New Jersey. Over the next two years Dickson worked to perfect the two basic machines required for successful motion pictures: a device to record moving images, which he and Edison called the Kinetograph; and a machine to view the results, which they called the Kinetoscope.
    [Show full text]