The Concluding Sentences of Margaret Ormsby's 1958 Opus
Pluralism, Institutionalism, and the Theories of BC Politics Mark Crawford he concluding sentences of Margaret Ormsby’s 1958 opus, British Columbia: A History, express belief in a singular west Tcoast identity: The name chosen for the Gold Colony by Queen Victoria seemed to the Duke of Newcastle in 1858 to be neither “very felicitous” nor “very original.” But one hundred years later, “British Columbia” still suggests more aptly than any other name could do, the sentiment and 1 the outlook of the Canadian people who live in the furthest west. Ormsby’s description has a colonial ring that is jarring to the ears of many Canadians today, especially First Nations and New Canadians; nonetheless, it does seem to capture the sense that something about the imposition of a British parliamentary and legal system upon the frontier political economy and culture beyond the Rockies produced a unique compound. Those who sought to explain the political dimensions of that uniqueness focused on the nature of the provincial party system, asking, for instance, why the Social Credit Party and the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (ccf)/New Democratic Party (ndp) pre- dominated provincially, and why the former was particularly dominant. But such discussion also led to a consideration of British Columbia’s unique political economy, political culture, and ideological features as well as its styles of public policy, leadership, and citizen-state relations. The early 1970s, in particular, produced a burst of scholarship on these questions, much of it in the pages of BC Studies. In a series of articles, book reviews, and exchanges that produced much heat as well as light, professors Black, Robin, Sproule-Jones, Blake, Ruff, and Cairns debated 1 Margaret A.
[Show full text]