Interview with the Hon. Nicola Roxon: Getting Evidence Into Health Policy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Interview with the Hon. Nicola Roxon: Getting Evidence Into Health Policy February 2017; Vol. 27(1):e2711701 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17061/phrp2711701 www.phrp.com.au Perspective – Interview Interview with the Hon. Nicola Roxon: getting evidence into health policy Nicola Roxona,b a Minister for Health and Ageing (2007–2011), Australian Government, Canberra, ACT b Sir Zelman Cowen Centre, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia Article history Introduction Publication date: February 2017 Public health researchers and practitioners want to see their research Roxon N. Interview with the Hon. inform government decision making. It is not always clear to researchers Nicola Roxon: getting evidence into how evidence is used in policy decisions in a highly politicised environment health policy. Public Health Res Pract. with many competing demands. We spoke to the Honourable Nicola Roxon, 2017;27(1):e2711701. doi: http://dx.doi. former Australian Minister for Health and Ageing (2007–2011), to gain some org/10.17061/phrp2711701 insight into the process, and advice on how to engage most productively with government. Q: Often ministers and policy makers must try to make good policy decisions Key points in areas where evidence is incomplete or contested. What strategies or • Working with decision makers to processes did you employ when trying to make good public health decisions implement new health policy often at a federal level when the evidence was insufficient? What were the main involves finding a political ‘sweet spot’ challenges involved and how did you overcome them? where a good policy decision is also A: I think it is very rare for ministers or governments to want to make decisions good politics where evidence is incomplete or contested (provided the contest is real, • When communicating a new idea to not fabricated by vested interests). There are so many competing, worthy, a minister or decision maker, health evidence based causes – especially in health – that these will usually be advocates should aim to capture the given priority. However, in a crowded political agenda, having a worthy cause imagination of the decision maker rather isn’t always enough to capture the imagination of government. The biggest than overwhelm them with years of in- single mistake I saw when I was Health Minister was repeated over and over depth research again, by decent, hard-working researchers, medicos and advocates – and • Plain packaging for tobacco products it was the naive assumption that, because they were working on something is a great example of implementing good, or had developed a worthy project, the government would therefore act good health policy where trusted health organisations worked across political on it. groups, provided expert research and As a minister, I was able to act on some fabulous ideas, and I’m proud of supported the government to take action that. But many good ideas were not acted upon – often because of financial constraints, but also many other reasons played a role. Just because your idea is good, even worthy, isn’t enough. Q: So, how does evidence inform policy decisions in the real world? A: To get real decisions and actions in your area, you must think closely and carefully about who you are putting your evidence to, their needs and priorities, and why your proposal will help them. In a world where most interventions cost money – and, in health, usually a lot of money – simply appealing to their good nature is too simplistic. You need to make it easy for 1 Public Health Research & Practice February 2017; Vol. 27(1):e2711701 • doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17061/phrp2711701 Getting evidence into health policy decision makers to see how acting on your idea is worth Q: What do you say to the researchers who feel that their taking up time, money and political energy. work is ignored? Knowing what is going on in the decision maker’s A: I am frustrated that governments are almost portfolio, what is troubling them, what is taking up their universally criticised for not taking action on public time and giving them sleepless nights helps you find health. Sometimes that criticism of governments is fair a way to fit your issue into their thinking space. Start and well based. We are right to expect courage and by putting yourself in the position of the minister you leadership from our governments. But, in truth, criticism want to take action. Do you know what they are trying to of governments is also sometimes lazy. It can be easier to achieve? Have you read any of their speeches or policies criticise a government for not acting on your issues than or recent interviews? Demonstrating your understanding to ask whether you’ve done all you can to help them take of their issues and pressures is good manners, but also that decision. helps you shape your pitch to their current interests or From the perspective of a former minister, I want to pressures. urge researchers, advocates and clinicians to assess For example, when the Australian Government whether they have done all they can to create a fertile announced health reform negotiations with the states, environment to encourage government leadership. When a few groups came to us with proposals that could they do, governments will provide leadership. be part of those discussions. Not all were successful, but it showed they were tuned in to opportunities, and Q: Can you give an example of this more courageous ready to make the most of them in a way that might suit leadership during your time as minister? government. A: One example is a cause close to my heart: Australia’s Even a scandal or problem can sometimes be a introduction of plain packaging for tobacco products. We chance to offer a helpful solution. It might help solve are proud to be world leaders in introducing our shocking the problem, or detract from it! Either way, this might be and ugly plain packs, and even more proud of the lively welcome. discussion and action it is generating elsewhere around The more in tune you are with the decision maker’s the world on the future of tobacco control. pressures, the more likely you are to be agile and think I have been very flattered, and often overwhelmed, laterally, to find good opportunities to raise your cause at by the recognition I get from introducing this measure. the right time. But the truth that ought to be acknowledged is that Q: When these opportunities present themselves, what is there were many people and many factors that made the best way to communicate? this courageous public health decision a good one for government, and easier than people imagine. A: Are you clear on what you would say and how you What made us choose this courageous path, when would say it if you got a brief chance to pitch your idea? A there were so many other competing issues on the table? lot of people talk about having an ‘elevator pitch’ – this is It offers a good case study about advocacy. the idea of what you would say if you were, by good luck, The work of so many researchers, advocates, doctors, in an elevator with the decision maker. Could you explain past governments, journalists and ordinary Australians your idea simply? And quickly enough? moved this seemingly courageous decision into a political The aim is to first capture the imagination of the ‘sweet spot’. Ultimately, it was a good policy decision that decision maker – get them to be interested in your idea, was good politics too. impressed with your focus and your offer to help them. It was an inexpensive policy with high impact; a I had too many meetings to recall where people policy with lots of supporters and a disliked opponent tried to download 20 years of in-depth research in (the tobacco industry); a highly visible policy that a 10-minute meeting – the minister needs to know it complemented other measures important to the is there, to appreciate your expertise or credibility, government, but perhaps less ‘sexy’. but they don’t need to be able to present a paper on On each of these issues, advocates and supporters it to the next technical meeting of the World Health of the initiative sought to make the necessary links to our Organization (WHO)! broader health reforms, our fresh focus on prevention and Stick to the headline message or your core thesis to our interest in Indigenous health. support a proposal – then you can leave the detailed And it helped that the public had responded well in summary for an adviser or official to mull over. the past to tobacco control interventions, showing the What you want from your meeting is to spark enough huge benefits of a comprehensive approach to tobacco interest that the minister asks for more work to be done control measures. The research was strong, and the on your issue – not that they decide to write a book on it. international treaty on tobacco (the WHO Framework Worse, your clear message will be diluted or lost if you try Convention on Tobacco Control) supportive. to do too much in a short meeting. 2 Public Health Research & Practice February 2017; Vol. 27(1):e2711701 • doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17061/phrp2711701 Getting evidence into health policy Q: What role would you expect from civil society in this Developing alliances across consumers, clinicians, process? advocates and researchers will always be very powerful. The same proposal from multiple groups gives your A: The Cancer Council and Heart Foundation in Australia argument weight and depth. Instead of all asking for were the rolled-gold best examples of this on plain something slightly different, if you can agree on one packaging – they worked across political groups, and major initiative or a good starting point, it is a very much had expert research as well as highly responsive media more convincing request.
Recommended publications
  • Budget Estimates 2011-12
    Senate Standing Committee on Economics ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE Innovation, Industry, Science and Research Portfolio Budget Estimates Hearing 2011-12 30 May 2011 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT: INNOVATION, INDUSTRY, SCIENCE AND RESEARCH TOPIC: PMSEIC REFERENCE: Written Question – Senator Colbeck QUESTION No.: BI-132 Senator COLBECK: Is a list of attendees documented for each of the PMSEIC meetings? If so, could these lists be provided for each of the meetings of 23 April 2008, 9 October 2008, 5 June 2009, 18 March 2010 and 4 February 2011? Alternatively, could you please provide a full breakdown of which Departmental secretaries have attended each of these meetings respectively? ANSWER Yes, full lists of attendees are documented for each of the PMSEIC meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Gillard Gave More on Health Deal: Baillieu Page 1 Of3 ~
    .L.._~ Gillard gave more on health deal: Baillieu Page 1 of3 ~ Gillard gave more on health deal: Baillieu PUBLISHED 02 .. c: .." c:::20c 1: 1: . DAVID CROWE, Mathew Dunckley, Fiona Buffini and AAP Victorian Premier Ted Baillieu has rubbished Prime Minister Julia Gillard's claim that the commonwealth did not grant concessions to win over the states to a proposed overhaul of the health system. s Gillard announced on Tuesday morning that a new model fOD funding hospitals would be established that would lift the federal funding contribution to 50 per cent of the growth in expenses in c]r urn for the states agreeing to introducing, among other things, 'activity-based" funding and local hospital boards. Ms Gillard told reporters that any claim that there had been concessions by the federal government between the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) meeting in February where a heads of agreement was signed and Tuesday's agreement was "simply wrong". Ted Baillieu: "It is clear that we have got significant improvement to the prior Mr Baillieu responded to that assertion by listing the wins he said funding arrangement". Photo: Angela Victoria had secured since that meeting. Wylie They included: • An exemption for Victoria's home and community care (HACC) from a commonwealth takeover • The retention of funding under state legislative and financial control in the state-federal pool that will remit cash to hospitals • $30 million in reward funding. "It is clear that we have got significant improvement to the prior funding arrangement," he said Ms Gillard announced an agreement with most states in February ~ 2011 but West Australian Premier Colin Barnett did not sign up to ~ the plan until this week, after details were negotiated.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HON NICOLA ROXON MP Attorney-General Minister for Emergency Management
    UNCLASSIFIED THE HON NICOLA ROXON MP Attorney-General Minister for Emergency Management SPEECH TO THE SECUIRTY IN GOVERNMENT CONFERENCE: PROTECTIVE SECURITY – POLICY IN ACTION ***CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY*** TUESDAY 4 SEPTEMBER Acknowledgements Thank you Mike (Mike Rothery, First Assistant Secretary, National Security Resilience Policy Division, Attorney-General’s Department) · Roger Wilkins AO, Secretary, Attorney-General’s Department · Security industry leaders and suppliers · Ladies and gentlemen. Introduction It’s great to join you for this year’s Security in Government Conference, my first as Attorney-General. SIG is considered to be Australia’s premier event on protective security, becoming very well established since its first gathering in 1987. That was certainly a different era. I was studying law at the University of Melbourne. And one of the most popular TV shows at the time was LA Law. While it wasn’t necessarily an accurate portrayal of the law or of legal proceedings, it was entertaining. I remember in one episode a teenage computer hacker was hired to fix the law firm’s phones. I thought the story line was intriguing. Could he really be trusted? I must admit, I don’t recall how the story played out. But I did do a bit of research and was amused to find the episode was written by Anonymous. And I think that’s enough said about that… I’ve also been informed that ’87 was the year the first mobile phone call was made in Australia. Today there are more than 29 million mobile phone and internet services in operation in Australia. Times have certainly changed.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Parliamentary Library Publication
    Using e-Research Briefs e-Research Briefs are Queensland Parliamentary Establishing a National Library publications which concisely summarise issues of importance to Registration and Members of Parliament and their constituency. e-Research Briefs are Accreditation Scheme for published in an electronic format and contain links to relevant information, such Health Practitioners: as legislation, news clippings, articles, discussion papers, policy Health Practitioner papers or other relevant information. Links are current at date of publication. Regulation National Law e-Research Briefs are distributed to all Members’ Bill 2009 (Qld) electorate offices via email. They can also be accessed via the Library’s Research Databases (Concord) available on the Queensland Parliament’s website at: www.parliament.qld.gov.au Hard copies of these publications can be obtained from the Library. Ph: 3406 7219 Bill: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Bill 2009 (Qld) Date of 6 October 2009 For further inquiries or introduction: comments contact: Portfolio: Health library.inquiries@ parliament.qld.gov.au or phone (07) 340 67219. Hansard Reference Queensland Parliamentary Debates, 6 October 2009, Second Reading pp 2512-2513 Speech: Mary Westcott* e-Research Brief 2009/27 October 2009 Research Publications are compiled for Members of the Queensland Parliament, for use in parliamentary debates and for related parliamentary purposes. Information in publications is current to the date of publication. Information on legislation, case law or legal policy issues does not constitute legal advice. Research Publications on Bills reflect the legislation as introduced and should not be considered complete guides to the legislation. To determine whether a Bill has been enacted, or whether amendments have been made to a Bill during consideration in detail, the Queensland Legislation Annotations, prepared by the Office of the Queensland Parliamentary Counsel, or the Bills Update, produced by the Table Office of the Queensland Parliament, should be consulted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian Women's Health Movement and Public Policy
    Reaching for Health The Australian women’s health movement and public policy Reaching for Health The Australian women’s health movement and public policy Gwendolyn Gray Jamieson Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Gray Jamieson, Gwendolyn. Title: Reaching for health [electronic resource] : the Australian women’s health movement and public policy / Gwendolyn Gray Jamieson. ISBN: 9781921862687 (ebook) 9781921862670 (pbk.) Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Birth control--Australia--History. Contraception--Australia--History. Sex discrimination against women--Australia--History. Women’s health services--Australia--History. Women--Health and hygiene--Australia--History. Women--Social conditions--History. Dewey Number: 362.1982 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press Contents Preface . .vii Acknowledgments . ix Abbreviations . xi Introduction . 1 1 . Concepts, Concerns, Critiques . 23 2 . With Only Their Bare Hands . 57 3 . Infrastructure Expansion: 1980s onwards . 89 4 . Group Proliferation and Formal Networks . 127 5 . Working Together for Health . 155 6 . Women’s Reproductive Rights: Confronting power . 179 7 . Policy Responses: States and Territories . 215 8 . Commonwealth Policy Responses . 245 9 . Explaining Australia’s Policy Responses . 279 10 . A Glass Half Full… . 305 Appendix 1: Time line of key events, 1960–2011 .
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 35 YEARS
    2019/20 ANNUAL REVIEW Celebrating 35 YEARS THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS PLATINUM SPONSOR CONTENTS King & Wood Mallesons GOLD SPONSORS ANZ BHP National Australia Bank KPMG Australia QBE Insurance Telstra SILVER SPONSORS Allens 4 – PRESIDENT’S REPORT We acknowledge the AMP Limited Traditional Custodians of Ashurst Boston Consulting Group 5 – BOARD MEMBERS the lands on which CEW BroadSpectrum Commonwealth Bank works and pay our respect Dan Murphy’s 6 – CEO’S REPORT to the Elders past, present Deloitte. Egon Zehnder 8 – STRATEGY UPDATE and emerging. CEW EY Gilbert + Tobin recognises their continuing The GPT Group 10 – THOUGHT LEADERSHIP AND connection to land, water Harvey Norman Heidrick + Struggles ADVOCACY FOR CHANGE and community and IAG J.P. Morgan 11 – PUBLICATIONS acknowledges the strength Lendlease of Indigenous women Macquarie Group Microsoft 12 – CELEBRATING 35 YEARS leading their communities. Mirvac We extend that respect Russell Reynolds Associates Spencer Stuart 14 / 19 – LEADERSHIP AND COVID-19 to Aboriginal and Torres Suncorp Sydney Airport Strait Islander people Wesfarmers 18 – HIGHLIGHTS who are part of the Westpac 26 – SCHOLARSHIPS CEW community. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS PARTNER ANZ RESEARCH PARTNER 30 – LEADERS PROGRAM Bain & Company PREMISES PARTNER 32 – FINANCIALS CBRE CEW CONNECT PARTNER 34 – PEOPLE Goldman Sachs CEW PARTNERS Allens 36 – MEMBERS Australian Government Deloitte. 38 – SPONSORS AND PARTNERS EY King & Wood Mallesons KPMG Australia PwC Spencer Stuart CEW ANNUAL REVIEW 2019/20 3 CONTENTS PRESIDENT’S REPORT BOARD MEMBERS A review of FY20 cannot overstate the impact of CEW is governed by a representative board the pandemic on all our lives: in the workplace, comprising President, Treasurer and Chairs of the financially and societally.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hon Nicola Roxon Mp ' Minister for Health and Agein
    THE HON NICOLA ROXON MP PETITIONS COMMITTE'E Received in Secretariat^/^/// MINISTER FOR HEALTH AND AGEIN j Petition No: The Hon John Murphy MP Number of Signatures: Chair Standing Committee on Petitions Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Dear Mr Murphy Thank you for your letter of 22 November 2010 regarding the petition of residents of Goodooga and surrounds about downgrades and reductions to health and emergency services to the area provided by the New South Wales Greater Western Area Health Service (GWAHS) and Ambulance Service of New South Wales. As per Standing Order 209(b), I am providing a written response to you on the matters raised in the petition. I note that the petition calls on the House to pressure the New South Wales Minister for Health, the Hon Carmel Tebbutt MP, and managerial staff of the GWAHS to secure the funding of its 24-hour emergency service and reinstate its ambulance service. The Australian Government is investing a record amount of up to $7.4 billion to implement the most significant reforms to health and hospitals since the introduction of Medicare. Under these reforms, the National Health and Hospitals Network will create a single national unified health system which is nationally funded and locally run to ensure all Australians have access to affordable and high quality health care. In September 2010, the Prime Minister, the Hon Julia Gillard MP, announced further investment through a new regional priority funding round of the Health and Hospitals Fund to improve health services to regional Australia. While the Commonwealth provides support and funding to the states and territories, the current management and delivery of health and hospital services rests with each state and territory government.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2010 Newsletter
    MAY 2010 AUSTRALIAN WOMEN’S HEALTH NETWORK Online Women’s Health News Bulletin May 2010 (www.awhn.org.au) Dear Members The AWHN Network News will be sent to all members three times a year (February, May and December). The AWHN Committee values your input and invites submissions for consideration. Contact details for submissions are provided at the conclusion of this newsletter. INSIDE THIS ISSUE Convenor’s Report Taking Action to Progress the New Agenda Aboriginal Women’s Talking Circle Report th 6 Australian Women’s Health Conference Progress Report State Round Up Articles of Interest State Reports Coming events Membership Form AWHN CONVENOR'S REPORT, December, 2009. PO Box 1160, Melbourne, Victoria, 3001 AWHN CONVENOR'S REPORT, April 2010. This is a quick update on our activities in the final weeks of Conference preparation. The same three projects continue to occupy most of our time: the Conference, lobbying around the new National Women's Health Policy (NWHP) and managing the AWHN Aboriginal Women's Talking Circle Project. The New National Women's Health Policy The consultation and submission processes for the NWHP were completed in 2009. Our understanding is that the policy is being written in the first half of 2010. We have not been able to find out anything about when the policy will be launched. At the beginning of the consultation process, we were told that it would be released in the middle of 2010. Later, we were told we could expect it earlier than that. The Committee thought it would be a great idea if the new policy could be launched at the Conference by the Minister for Health, Nicola Roxon.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HON NICOLA ROXON MP Minister for Health and Ageing
    THE HON NICOLA ROXON MP Minister for Health and Ageing MEDIA RELEASE 20 December 2010 $22m Boost to Australians fighting cancer Cancer treatment and prevention continues to get top priority from the Gillard Government, following two announcements today totalling $22.6 million for high- priority cancer research projects and to extend clinical trials. The Minister for Health and Ageing, Nicola Roxon, explained the Government will invest $7.8 million, with funding partners contributing more than $3 million, to fund 27 new cancer research projects. In addition, the Government will also provide $11.3 for 13 National Cancer Trials Groups and to expand the Regional Trials Networks across 10 regional hospitals. “We have some of the world’s best cancer researchers and research institutes, and have made big inroads into treating the disease,” Ms Roxon said. “This funding will support important research to improve the effectiveness of cancer treatment and prevention for the benefit of all Australians.” The 27 new cancer research projects, underway through Cancer Australia’s Priority- driven Collaborative Cancer Research Scheme, include innovative joint ventures with organisations such as beyondblue, the Prostate Council of Australia, National Breast Cancer Foundation, Leukaemia Foundation, CanTeen and more. Ms Roxon also explained that the Government’s investment in the ten regional cancer centres will make it easier for people who live in regional centres to take part in and benefit from these cancer trials groups––without having to travel to metropolitan
    [Show full text]
  • The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010
    The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010 The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010 Edited by Chris Aulich and Mark Evans Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/rudd_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: The Rudd government : Australian Commonwealth administration 2007 - 2010 / edited by Chris Aulich and Mark Evans. ISBN: 9781921862069 (pbk.) 9781921862076 (eBook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Rudd, Kevin, 1957---Political and social views. Australian Labor Party. Public administration--Australia. Australia--Politics and government--2001- Other Authors/Contributors: Aulich, Chris, 1947- Evans, Mark Dr. Dewey Number: 324.29407 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by ANU E Press Illustrations by David Pope, The Canberra Times Printed by Griffin Press Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2010 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgments . vii Contributors . ix Part I. Introduction 1 . It was the best of times; it was the worst of times . 3 Chris Aulich 2 . Issues and agendas for the term . 17 John Wanna Part II. The Institutions of Government 3 . The Australian Public Service: new agendas and reform . 35 John Halligan 4 . Continuity and change in the outer public sector .
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter SUMMER 2012 Issue
    Newsletter SUMMER 2012 issue Letter from Sophie Could I be a leader? I have spent the last month running a series of leadership seminars for women around Australia. It has been a wonderfully optimistic exercise. As so often happens when groups of women come together, despite them being complete strangers they are chatting within minutes, laughing and then the conversation quickly morphs into serious discussion of global issues. They were an eclectic group of women from the Pilbara, Cairns, Broken Hill and down town Melbourne managing government departments that deliver health, education and police services. Others worked in banks, construction, oil and biotech companies. Not for profits were also well represented. Marita Cheng Engineering Visionary I told stories about my female heroines such as Prof Fiona Stanley, Sheryl 2012 Young Australian of the Year, Sandberg, Marita Cheng and Christine Nixon to illustrate how women manage Marita is currently studying their careers, find mentors, manage difficult workplace situations, and find engineering and computer science their voices. at University of Melbourne. In 2008 Marita founded Robogals Global My strongest impressions were that you can achieve a lot in a day when you to change the way that girls view their capacity to contribute to engineering are focused and give people the chance to reflect on their values, priorities, and technology. Already Robogals style and achievements. The isolation of workplaces is highlighted as people has run robotics workshops for 3,000 are relieved that others experience the same frustrations and anxieties. girls across 80 schools in Australia. Marita is the recipient of a number of Women want to contribute, enjoy their work and make their mark but don’t Fellowship and Awards and was a always covet the top job.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008
    TEN YEARS of ACHIEVEMENT Breast Cancer Network Australia Annual Review 2008 Contents Refl ecting on ten years 1 Organisational structure 2 Board 2 Vision & Mission 3 Meeting our mission In this report we will explore how we have achieved our mission over the last ten years, highlighting ten achievements under each mission statement. To inform 4 To empower 8 To represent 12 To link together 16 Key partners & sponsors 20 Executive team 22 Fundraising 2008 22 Financial summary 23 Mini-Field locations 2008 24 Field of Women locations since 1999 24 Resources 25 Endorsements 25 2008 BCNA Advocate appointments 26 1 Reflecting on ten years ▲ BCNA Chair Patricia Edgar and CEO Lyn Swinburne. It seems somehow surreal for me to take a step back Throughout these past ten years, many women and and see Breast Cancer Network Australia as the thriving, men have helped form our work and can take credit for infl uential organisation it is today, working for the benefi t of maintaining the passion and the focus. At the forefront of thousands of women and families affected by breast cancer. these is Patricia Edgar, our Chair from the very beginning, when we were a fl edgling organisation full of determination My thoughts return to that fi rst Field of Women and our and promise but facing major challenges. Patricia retires launch in Canberra ten years ago. We had great hopes of in mid-2009, and her thorough leadership, wisdom and positively infl uencing the way breast cancer was considered contribution as my personal mentor has been considerable.
    [Show full text]