Honicknowle Neighbourhood

AREA PROFILE: HONICKNOWLE NEIGHBOURHOOD Author: Office of the Director of Public Health, Plymouth City Council Date: June 2016 This profile is produced as part of Plymouth’s Joint Strategic Needs Assessment. Document information Document status Draft Author Office of the Director of Public Health Document version V2.0 Orginal document date Amendment record Version Date Reason(s) for change Pages affected V2.0 Mar-16 Updates to the indicators All Office of the Director of Public Health Plymouth City Council Windsor House Plymouth PL6 5UF Tel: 01752 307346 [email protected] Date: Mar 2016 (V2.0) Prepared by: Office of the Director of Public Health For queries relating to this document please contact: [email protected] Acknowledgements: We are grateful to those colleagues and partners that have contributed to this report. In particular The Policy, Performance and Partnerships Team © Public Health 2016 This profile is intended to provide a summary of the key health and social care indicators in the area. It is anticipated that the profiles will be of use to anyone with an interest in the area and how it compares with the city as a whole. Updated versions of the profiles will be produced as new information becomes available and in response to requests for additional data items or categories. Contents 1. Area summary 1 2. Area table 2 3. Area maps 3 4. Demography 4 5. Deprivation 5 6. Benefits uptake 6 7. Crime 7 8. Education and children 8 9. Health 9 10. Housing 10 11. Social care 11 1. Area summary Honicknowle had a total population of 9,578 in 2014. Of these 47.3% were male and 52.7% were female. 7.7% of the population were aged 0-4 years and 2.2% were aged 85+. The overall IMD 2015 deprivation score for Honicknowle is 38.7. Honicknowle ranks at number 9 (where 1 is the most deprived and 39 is the least deprived of the city's neighbourhoods 22.2% of the population were claiming some form of benefit in 2015. This is above the city-wide figure of 15.4%. 2.5% of the working age population were claiming jobseekers allowance in 2015. This is above the city-wide figure of 2.0%. The rate of anti-social behaviour was 40.7 per 1,000 population in 2014/15. This is above the city-wide figure of 38.5. The rate of all crime was 66.2 per 1,000 population in 2014/15. This is below the city-wide figure of 72.0. The rate of children in need was 1,188.4 per 10,000 population aged 0-17 during 2014/15. This is above the city-wide figure of 1126.7. 39.3% of pupils achieved five or more A*-C grades at GCSE (including English and Maths) in 2014/15. This is below the city-wide figure of 50.4%. Life expectancy in 2012-14 was 78.2 years. This is below the city-wide figure of 80.6 years. The rate of emergency hospital admissions was 1,176.0 per 10,000 population in 2013/14. This is above the city-wide figure of 1,042.7. The all age, all cause mortality rate was 81.7 per 10,000 population in 2014. This is below the city-wide figure of 96.8. 29.0% of the private sector housing stock was classed as 'non-decent homes' in 2010. This is below the city-wide figure of 33.3%. 9.3% of the private sector housing stock was not in a reasonable state of repair in 2010. This is below the city-wide figure of 11.1%. The rate of all clients in receipt of packages of care was 250.7 per 10,000 population aged 18+ during 2014/15. This is above the city-wide figure of 220.1. The rate of clients with a learning disability was 69.9 per 10,000 population aged 18-64 during 2014/15. This is above the city-wide figure of 52.5. 1 of 12 2. Area table Category Indicator RAG Category Indicator RAG Overall IMD score 1 Life expectancy 1 Barriers to housing and services score 0 Smoking in pregnancy 1 Crime and disorder score 1 Breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks 1 Education skills and training score 1 Vulnerable families 1 Employment score 1 Excess weight (reception) 1 Deprivation Health deprivation and disability score 1 Excess weight (year 6) 1 Income score 1 Adult smoking 1 Living environment score 0 Excess weight in adults 1 Health Claimants 1 Outpatient DNAs 1 Jobseekers 1 Emergency hospital admissions 1 Employment and support allowance / incapacity benefit 1 Cancer mortality <75s 1 Lone parent 1 CVD mortality <75s 1 Carer benefit 1 All age all cause mortality 0 Income related 1 Mortality rate for cancer, CHD, COPD & stroke - all ages 1 Disabled 1 Non-decent homes 0 Bereaved 1 Thermal comfort 0 Benefits uptake Male - employment benefits 1 Category 1 hazards 0 Female - employment benefits 1 Disrepair 0 Housing 16-24 employment benefits 1 Non-modern amenities 0 25-49 employment benefits 1 Category 1 excess cold 0 50 and over employment benefits 1 All clients 1 Anti-social behaviour 1 Community based service clients 1 care Social Criminal damage 1 Learning disabilities 18-64 clients 1 Domestic abuse incidents 1 Serious acquisitive crime 0 Crime Violence with injury 0 All crime 0 Child protection 1 Children in care 0 Children in need 1 Key stage 2 pupils who achieved required Level 4 in English and Maths 1 children Key stage 2 pupils with free school meal eligibility who achieved required 1 Education and Level 4 in English and Maths Pupils achieving five or more A*-C grades at GCSE (including English and Maths) 1 Key Better than Plymouth Same as Plymouth Worse than Plymouth Data has been supressed N/A Please note that the Red/Amber/Green rating applied in this table simply indicates whether the value for the area is worse, equal to, or better than Plymouth as a whole. It gives no indication of how much ‘better’ or ‘worse’ the area is than the city as a whole for that specific indicator. The definitions of each of these indicators are given on the subsequent topic-specific pages. 3. Area maps 2 of 12 4. Demography 3 of 12 Honicknowle population pyramid 90+ 85-89 80-84 70-79 70-74 60-69 60-64 50-59 50-54 Female 40-49 Male 40-44 Plymouth 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 05-09 00-04 6% 4% 2% 0% 2% 4% 6% Population (number) Population (percentage) Plymouth (percentage) Age group Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total 00-04 366 372 738 3.8 3.9 7.7 3.1 3.0 6.1 05-09 351 334 685 3.7 3.5 7.2 2.8 2.7 5.5 10-19 614 624 1,238 6.4 6.5 12.9 5.8 5.5 11.2 20-34 911 966 1,877 9.5 10.1 19.6 12.4 11.4 23.8 35-44 505 559 1,064 5.3 5.8 11.1 5.8 5.9 11.7 45-64 1,029 1,207 2,236 10.7 12.6 23.3 11.9 12.3 24.2 65-74 442 521 963 4.6 5.4 10.1 4.6 4.9 9.5 75-84 232 337 569 2.4 3.5 5.9 2.5 3.2 5.7 85+ 79 129 208 0.8 1.3 2.2 0.8 1.5 2.3 All ages 4,529 5,049 9,578 47.3 52.7 100.0 49.7 50.3 100.0 Source: ONS Mid-Year Estimates, 2014 4 of 12 5. Deprivation Area Index of Multiple Deprivation 2015 Plymouth Domain scores Value Rank average Overall IMD score 38.7 9 26.6 Barriers to housing and services score 19.1 22 19.8 Crime and disorder score 0.7 14 0.2 Education, skills and training score 44.1 4 24.1 Employment score 0.2 8 0.1 Health deprivation and disability score 1.1 9 0.7 Income score 0.3 8 0.2 Living environment score 20.5 19 26.7 Deprivation measures attempt to identify communities where the need for healthcare is greater, material resources are less and as such the capacity to cope with the consequences of ill-health are less. Areas are therefore deprived if there is inadequate education, inadequate housing, unemployment, insufficient income, poor health, and low opportunities for enjoyment. A deprived area is conventionally understood to be a place in which the residents tend to be relatively poor and are relatively likely to suffer from misfortunes such as ill-health. The Index of Multiple Deprivation 2015 (IMD 2015) is the current official measure of deprivation. The IMD 2015 combines a number of indicators, chosen to cover a range of economic, social and housing issues, into a single deprivation score for each small area in England. This allows each area to be ranked relative to one another according to their level of deprivation. The IMD 2015 is not routinely available at neighbourhood level, analysis has therefore been carried out by Plymouth City Council, Office of the Director of Public Health to produce IMD 2015 scores for each of the city's 39 neighbourhoods. The higher the score, the more deprived the area is on that measure.

Load more