Ziba Peterson: from Missionary to Hanging Sheriff H
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Doctrine and Covenants Stories
CHAPTER 15 A Mission to the Lamanites September 1830 esus wanted more people to hear about the gospel. J He wanted some of the Saints to go on missions. He called Oliver Cowdery to go on a mission to the American Indians. These Indians were also called Lamanites because some of them were descended from the Lamanites in the Book of Mormon. Doctrine and Covenants 28:8 Jesus wanted the Lamanites to read the Book of Mormon. The Book of Mormon tells the Lamanites about their He had promised many prophets that the Lamanites ancestors who lived hundreds of years ago. It tells them would have the Book of Mormon. Now it was time to about important promises Jesus made to them. It helps keep that promise. them believe in Jesus. It teaches them to repent and be Doctrine and Covenants 3:19–20 baptized. Doctrine and Covenants 3:19–20 58 Other men wanted to go with Oliver Cowdery to preach First the missionaries went to some tribes in New York. the gospel to the Lamanites. The Lord said three of the The missionaries gave the people the Book of Mormon, men could go. but only a few of them could read. Then the missionaries went to preach to some Lamanites The missionaries left Ohio and went to a town named in Ohio. These people were happy to hear about the Independence in Jackson County, Missouri. Book of Mormon and learn about their ancestors. 59 There were many Lamanites in Missouri. The missionaries Other people in Missouri did not believe the restored preached the gospel to them and gave them the Book of gospel or the Book of Mormon. -
Family Stories: Handle with Care, Especially the Most Dramatic Ones
BYU Family Historian Volume 5 Article 4 9-1-2006 Family Stories: Handle With Care, Especially the Most Dramatic Ones William G. Hartley Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byufamilyhistorian BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Hartley, William G. (2006) "Family Stories: Handle With Care, Especially the Most Dramatic Ones," BYU Family Historian: Vol. 5 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byufamilyhistorian/vol5/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Family Historian by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. FAMILY STORIES: HANDLE WITH CARE, ESPECIALLY THE MOST DRAMATIC ONES WILLIAM G. HARTLEY Rare is the family story that does not get “better” as retold over time. A few families have in them characters who like to tell tall tales, or at least embellish information they relate about their parents or grandparents. Most often, however, misinformation gains currency unintentionally. People assume they have the story right, but in fact they misunderstood minor and sometimes major details. We need to record and treasure family stories that come to us, even though most are wheat with chaff. Folklorist Bert Wilson has shown us that repeatedly told family stories, be they true or false, convey a truth about what the family values. He suggests we ask why that story matters so much to the family that it continues to be told.1 But, as history students are taught early, we need to keep an attitude of skepticism about how accurate our sources of historical information are. -
Life and Times of Mormon (Pdf)
THE LIFE AND TIMES M O R M O N Creating A Sense of Place Prepared by John Lefgren July 23, 2019 The Life and Times of Mormon From Shim to Cumorah -- AD 321 to AD 385 Year Age Event 321 10 Ammaron visits Mormon and instructs him that in Shim there are sacred records engraved on gold. 322 11 Mormon is carried into the land southward to the land of Zarahemla by his father. 326 15 Mormon is visited by the Lord at the age of fifteen, "and taste[s] and [knows] of the goodness of Jesus" (Mormon 1:15). 327 16 Mormon becomes head of the Nephite armies and leads them in battle against the Lamanites. 331 20 Mormon and his army of 42,000 defeats the Lamanite king, Aaron, and his army of 44,000. 335 24 Mormon goes to the hill called Shim in the land Antum, takes the plates of Nephi, and begins his abridgment of the records. 345 34 Nephites retreat to the land of Jashon, but are driven forth again northward to the land of Shem. 346 35 A Nephite army of 30,000 beats a Lamanite army of 50,000. 350 39 The Nephites make a treaty with the Lamanites and the Gadianton Robbers, giving the Nephites the land northward up "to the narrow passage which led into the land southward", and giving the Lamanites the land southward (Mormon 2:28-9). No battles fought between the Nephites and the Lamanites from AD 350 to AD 360. 360 49 Lamanites again come to battle the Nephites. -
The Witness of the King and Queen Astonished the Specta- Jesus According to His Timing
Published Quarterly by The Book of Mormon Foundation Number 119 • Summer 2006 Now the people which were not Lamanites, were Nephites; nevertheless, they were called Nephites, Jacobites, Josephites, Zoramites, Lamanites, Lemuelites, and Ishmaelites. But I, Jacob, shall not hereafter Sam, the Son distinguish them by these names, but I shall call them Lamanites, that seek to destroy the people of Nephi; and those who are friendly to Nephi, I shall call Nephites, or the people of Nephi, according to the reigns of the kings. (Jacob 1:13-14; see also 4 Nephi 1:40-42; of Lehi Mormon 1:8 RLDS) [Jacob 1:13-14, see also 4 Nephi by Gary Whiting 1:36-38, Mormon 1:8 LDS] he opening pages of the Book of Mormon describe Each of the sons of Lehi had families that developed the faith and struggles of the prophet Lehi as seen into tribes known by the name of the son who fathered them. T through the eyes of his son, Nephi. Nephi describes Thus the tribal names were Lamanites, Lemuelites, Nephites, his family’s departure from Jerusalem and the trial of their long Jacobites and Josephites. Even Zoram (Zoramites) and Ishmael journey to the Promised Land. Through the pages of Nephi’s (Ishmaelites) had their names attached to tribal families. spiritual journey, the family and friends of Lehi are introduced. However, never in the Book of Mormon is a tribe named As the story begins, Lehi has four sons: Laman, Lemuel, Sam after Sam. Why is this? and Nephi. The first introduction of the family is given by Although he is somewhat of a mystery, Sam’s life and faith Nephi shortly after they left the land of Jerusalem. -
"Lamanites" and the Spirit of the Lord
"Lamanites" and the Spirit of the Lord Eugene England EDITORS' NOTE: This issue of DIALOGUE, which was funded by Dora Hartvigsen England and Eugene England Sr., and their children and guest-edited by David J. Whittaker, has been planned as an effort to increase understanding of the history of Mor- mon responses to the "Lamanites" — native peoples of the Americas and Poly- nesia. We have invited Eugene England, Jr., professor of English at BYU, to document his parents' efforts, over a period of forty years, to respond to what he names "the spirit of Lehi" — a focused interest in and effort to help those who are called Lamanites. His essay also reviews the sources and proper present use of that term (too often used with misunderstanding and offense) and the origins and prophesied future of those to whom it has been applied. y parents grew up conditioned toward racial prejudice — as did most Americans, including Mormons, through their generation and into part of mine. But something touched my father in his early life and grew con- stantly in him until he and my mother were moved at mid-life gradually to consecrate most of their life's earnings from then on to help Lamanites. I wish to call what touched them "the spirit of Lehi." It came in its earliest, somewhat vague, form to my father when he left home as a seventeen-year-old, took a job as an apprentice Union Pacific coach painter in Pocatello, Idaho, and — because he was still a farmboy in habits and woke up each morning at five — read the Book of Mormon and The Discourses of Brigham Young in his lonely boarding room. -
The Political Dimension in Nephi's Small Plates
BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 27 Issue 4 Article 3 10-1-1987 The Political Dimension in Nephi's Small Plates Noel B. Reynolds Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq Recommended Citation Reynolds, Noel B. (1987) "The Political Dimension in Nephi's Small Plates," BYU Studies Quarterly: Vol. 27 : Iss. 4 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol27/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Studies Quarterly by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Reynolds: The Political Dimension in Nephi's Small Plates the political dimension in nephis small plates noel B reynolds every people needs to know that its laws and rulers are legitimate and authoritative this is why stories of national origins and city founfoundingssoundingsdings are so important to human societies throughout the world such stories provide explanations of the legitimate origins of their laws and their rulers not untypically such traditions also deal with ambiguous elements of the founding explaining away possibly competing accounts when nephi undertook late in his life to write a third account of the founding events of the lehitelehine colony it appears that he wanted to provide his descendants with a document that would serve this function his small plates systematically defend the nephite -
Julia Murdock Smith
On Being Adopted: Julia Murdock Smith Sunny McClellan Morton JULIA MURDOCK SMITH WAS ONE OF THE INFANT TWINS adopted by Joseph and Emma Smith. She was raised as the oldest child in the Smith household. In re- cent years, biographers have claimed Julia as primary subject material, and her fascinating character and life have begun to take shape. However, in some ways Julia remains an enigma, even to devotees of the prophet and his family—as if even after her death, she has been touched by the same disconnectedness that in- fluenced her relationships and sense of self during her life. She was adopted: not quite a Smith, not quite a Murdock, and to historians of Mormonism, not quite a Mormon. In this paper, I examine the ways adoption may have shaped Julia's life, drawing on modern psychological literature that characterizes the experiences of those who have been adopted. I ground my approach in the theory that the human response to being given away by one's birthparents transcends genera- tional effects.1 In other words, Julia's feelings about being adopted shouldn't dif- fer significantly from those of modern adoptees. I will first provide biographical information on Julia. A description of nineteenth-century adoption practices and modern closed adoptions will follow, with comments on their relevance to Julia's experiences. These materials will provide context for an exploration of Julia's relationships with her adoptive and biological families and a discussion 1. A model and rationale for this approach may be found in Paul C. Rosenblatt's Bitter, Bitter Tears: Nineteenth-Century Diarists and Twentieth-Century Grief Theories (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983). -
Doctrine and Covenants Student Manual Religion 324 and 325
Doctrine and Covenants Student Manual Religion 324 and 325 Prepared by the Church Educational System Published by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Salt Lake City, Utah Send comments and corrections, including typographic errors, to CES Editing, 50 E. North Temple Street, Floor 8, Salt Lake City, UT 84150-2722 USA. E-mail: <[email protected]> Second edition © 1981, 2001 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America English approval: 4/02 Table of Contents Preface . vii Section 21 Maps . viii “His Word Ye Shall Receive, As If from Mine Own Mouth” . 43 Introduction The Doctrine and Covenants: Section 22 The Voice of the Lord to All Men . 1 Baptism: A New and Everlasting Covenant . 46 Section 1 The Lord’s Preface: “The Voice Section 23 of Warning”. 3 “Strengthen the Church Continually”. 47 Section 2 Section 24 “The Promises Made to the Fathers” . 6 “Declare My Gospel As with the Voice of a Trump” . 48 Section 3 “The Works and the Designs . of Section 25 God Cannot Be Frustrated” . 9 “An Elect Lady” . 50 Section 4 Section 26 “O Ye That Embark in the Service The Law of Common Consent . 54 of God” . 11 Section 27 Section 5 “When Ye Partake of the Sacrament” . 55 The Testimony of Three Witnesses . 12 Section 28 Section 6 “Thou Shalt Not Command Him Who The Arrival of Oliver Cowdery . 14 Is at Thy Head”. 57 Section 7 Section 29 John the Revelator . 17 Prepare against the Day of Tribulation . 59 Section 8 Section 30 The Spirit of Revelation . -
Early Marriages Performed by the Latter-Day Saint Elders in Jackson County, Missouri, 1832-1834
Scott H. Faulring: Jackson County Marriages by LDS Elders 197 Early Marriages Performed by the Latter-day Saint Elders in Jackson County, Missouri, 1832-1834 Compiled and Edited with an Introduction by Scott H. Faulring During the two and a half years (1831-1833) the members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints lived in Jackson County, Missouri, they struggled to establish a Zion community. In July 1831, the Saints were commanded by revelation to gather to Jackson County because the Lord had declared that this area was “the land of promise” and designat- ed it as “the place for the city of Zion” (D&C 57:2). During this period, the Mormon settlers had problems with their immediate Missourian neighbors. Much of the friction resulted from their religious, social, cultural and eco- nomic differences. The Latter-day Saint immigrants were predominantly from the northeastern United States while the “old settlers” had moved to Missouri from the southern states and were slave holders. Because of the Missouri Compromise of 1820, Missouri was a slave state. Eventually, by mid-July 1833, a militant group of Jackson County Missourians became intolerant of the Mormons and began the process of forcefully expelling them from the county.1 And yet in spite of these mounting hostilities, a little-known aspect of the Latter-day Saints’ stay in Jackson County is that during this time, the Mormon elders were allowed to perform civil marriages. In contrast to the legal difficulties some of the elders faced in Ohio, the Latter-day Saint priest- hood holders were recognized by the civil authorities as “preachers of the gospel.”2 Years earlier, on 4 July 1825, Missouri enacted a statute entitled, “Marriages. -
Opening the Heavens: Seventy-Six Accounts of Joseph Smith's
Desk in the room of the restored John Johnson home, Hiram, Ohio, in which “The Vision,” now known as Doctrine and Covenants 76, was received con- currently by Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon. Courtesy John W. Welch. Seventy-six Accounts of Joseph Smith’s Visionary Experiences Alexander L. Baugh oseph Smith the seer ushered in the dispensation of the fullness of Jtimes. His role was known and prophesied of anciently. The Lord promised Joseph of Egypt that in the last days a “choice seer” would come through his lineage and would bring his seed to a knowledge of the covenants made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (2 Ne. 3:7; jst Gen. 50:27–28). “That seer will the Lord bless,” Joseph prophesied, specifi- cally indicating that “his name shall be called after me” (2 Ne. 3:14–15; see also jst Gen. 50:33). Significantly, in the revelation received dur- ing the organizational meeting of the Church on April 6, 1830, the first title given to the first elder was that of seer: “Behold, there shall be a record kept . and in it thou [Joseph Smith] shalt be called a seer, a translator, a prophet, an apostle of Jesus Christ” (D&C 21:1). In the Book of Mormon, Ammon defined a seer as one who pos- sessed “a gift from God” to translate ancient records (Mosiah 8:13; see also 28:11–16). However, the seeric gift is not limited to translation, hence Ammon’s additional statement that “a seer is a revelator and a prophet also; and a gift which is greater can no man have” (Mosiah 8:16). -
The Church in Northern Missouri, 1836–38
The Church in Northern Missouri, 1836–38 Time Line Date Significant Event Summer 1836 Saints began settling Far West 26 December 1836 Caldwell County was created November 1837 Joseph Smith briefly visited Far West 14 March 1838 Prophet arrived to settle in Far West May 1838 Adam-ondi-Ahman was founded June 1838 Town of DeWitt was settled 19 June 1838 Sidney Rigdon gave his “Salt Sermon” 4 July 1838 Sidney Rigdon gave his Independence Day speech 8 July 1838 Four new Apostles were called, and the law of tithing was revealed The Prophet and other leaders of the Church left only along the streams and rivers. At that time only for- Kirtland in January 1838. Most other members followed ested land was considered good for settlement. W. W. later in the year. There was no decision to abandon Phelps reported that “nearly every skirt of timber to the Kirtland, but clearly the focal point of the Church was state line on the north … has some one in it.” But the switching to northern Missouri. Perhaps a few mem- brethren found an uninhabited area in northern Ray bers recalled the revelation given in 1831: “I, the Lord, County along Shoal Creek, although they feared there will to retain a strong hold in the land of Kirtland, for was not enough timber available to support a large pop- the space of five years” (D&C 64:21). By early 1838 the ulation.1 Nevertheless, the brethren began purchasing years of Kirtland’s glory had passed. The members in land in the Shoal Creek area on 3 May. -
John R. Murdocklehi's Third Mayor by Richard Van Wagoner
John R. MurdockLehi’s Third Mayor By Richard Van Wagoner 186163 The American system of democratic government developed, in some degree, from early town meetings where men elected their officials and freely debated personal beliefs. During the first forty years of municipal elections in Lehi and elsewhere in Utah, the People’s party ran unopposed, and were always elected unanimously since there was no opposition. An example of how this system worked can be studied in the diary of Lorenzo Hill Hatch, who served in the Lehi Ward bishopric from 185263. On February 6, 1856, under the direction of Mayor/Bishop David Evans, Hatch “made out a list of names for the City officers to be elected if the people chose to do so”. On August 1, 1858 he was “called up by bishop Evans to go call the teachers together to arrange for the election”, and on February 13, 1859 he noted that he “was appointed or elected as Alderman”, As Lehi historian Hamilton Gardner put it in 1913, “nomination on the People’s Party ticket always insur(ed) election.” This procedure, closely resembling the Mormon custom of sustaining leaders with an “uplifted hand” rather than by secret ballot, remained in force until after the June 10, 1891 dissolution of the People’s Party. Thus when I tell you that John Riggs Murdock, People’s Party candidate, was “elected” Lehi mayor on February 11, 1861, you have a better understanding of what that statement truly means. Mayor Murdock, perhaps Lehi’s best known early citizen outside the community, was born September 13, 1826 in Orange township, Ohio.