Sculpture 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sculpture 2019 ADVENTURES IN 3 DIMENSIONS: 20TH CENTURY SCULPTURE IN BRITAIN ! Michael Ayrton: Arkville Minotaur 1968-9 I became a sculptor to make things real. (Henry Moore) ARTISTS" Alfred Gilbert 1854-1934 Anthony Caro 1924-2013 Frederic Leighton 1830-96 Elisabeth Frink 1930-93 Hamo Thorneycroft 1850-1925 Barbara Hepworth 1903-75 George Frederic Watts 1817-1904 Henry Moore 1898-1986 Eduardo Paolozzi 1924-2005 Jacob Epstein 1880-1959 Frank Dobson 1888-1963 Tony Cragg b.1949 Henri Gaudier-Brzeska 1891-1915 Antony Gormley b.1950 Eric Gill 1882-1986 David Nash b.1945 Cornelia Parker b.1956 Michael Ayrton 1921-75 FURTHER READING Susan Beattie The New Sculpture 1983 Yale University Press Andrew Causey Sculpture since 1945 (Oxford History of Art) 1998 Oxford University Press Penelope Curtis Sculpture 1900-1945 (Oxford History of Art) 1999 Oxford University Press Penelope Curtis & Keith Wilson Modern British Sculpture 2011 Royal Academy Herbert George The Elements of Sculpture 2014 Phaidon D.J. Getsey Sculpture and the Pursuit of a Modern Ideal in Britain Ashgate Publishing 2004 Alison Stace Sculpture Parks and Trails of Great Britain and Ireland 2013 A&C Black Visual Arts William Tucker The Language of Sculpture (new ed.) Thames & Hudson 1992 There is also an excellent series published by Lund Humphries in association with the Henry Moore Foundation: British Sculptors and Sculpture, which includes monographs of many less familiar artists. FURTHER EXPLORATIONS The increasing number of Sculpture Parks in this country provide opportunities to see sculpture in what many of the makers regarded as its natural habitat – the landscape. Among the best are: • The Barbara Hepworth Museum and Sculpture Garden, St Ives, Cornwall • The Cass Sculpture Foundation, Goodwood. • The Henry Moore Foundation, Perry Green, Hertfordshire • The Ironbridge Open Air Museum of Steel Sculpture, Telford, Shropshire • The New Art Centre Sculpture Park and Gallery, Roche Court, Wiltshire • Sausmarez Manor Art Park, Guernsey • The Yorkshire Sculpture Park, Wakefield (you might also take the opportunity to visit the Hepworth Wakefield - not a sculpture park, but with a wonderful collection of modern art and many of Hepworth’s maquettes and working models.) And in addition – keep your eyes open wherever you go. City, town and country – there’s more sculpture out there than you might think! SLIDE LIST Slide 1: Leslie Illingworth ‘Inspiration’ (Modern British Sculpture) 1953 [Daily Mail] Slide 2: It takes courage to be a sculptor Henri Gaudier-Brzeska Hieratic Head of Ezra Pound 1914 (marble) [National Gallery of Art, Washington DC] Michael Ayrton Watching Figure 1954 (bronze) [Private Collection] Henry Moore Hill Arches 1972-3 (bronze) [Henry Moore Foundation, Herts] Slide 3: How something feels Hamo Thorneycroft Oliver Cromwell 1895-99 (bronze) [Houses of Parliament] Elisabeth Frink Walking Madonna 1981 (bronze) [Salisbury Cathedral] Slide 4: Because I have something to say Frederic Leighton Athlete Wrestling with a Python 1877 (bronze) [Tate Britain] George Frederic Watts Physical Energy 1902 (bronze) [Kensington Gardens] Slide 5: Stay what is fleeting Alfred Gilbert Shaftsbury Memorial (Eros) 1886-93 (bronze & aluminium) George Frampton Peter Pan 1912 (bronze) [Kensington Gardens] Slide 6: Stone in its inmost being Hamo Thorneycroft Joy of Life 1895 (bronze) [Private Collection] Eric Gill Joie de Vivre (A Roland for an Oliver) 1910 (Hoptonwood stone) [University of Hull] Slide 7: Synonymous with art atrocity Jacob Epstein Infancy 1908 (plaster model for stone) [Original carvings on Zimbabwe House, The Strand] Figure in Flenite 1913 (Serpentine stone) [Tate Britain] Portrait of Einstein 1933 (bronze) [V&A] Slide 8: Sculptural energy ... Sculptural feeling Henri Gaudier-Brzeska Red Stone Dancer 1913-14 (Red Mansfield stone) [Tate Britain] Sleeping Fawn 1913 (painted plaster from original marble) [Tate Britain] Bird Swallowing Fish 1914 (painted plaster) [Kettle’s Yard, Cambridge] Slide 9: Each piece is a sort of vessel Jacob Epstein Rock Drill (Torso) 1913-16 (bronze) [Tate Britain] Frank Dobson Manchild 1921 (marble) [Tate Britain] Slide 10: Art should have a certain mystery Henry Moore Large Upright Internal/External Form 1981-2 (bronze) [Henry Moore Foundation] A Suckling Child 1930 (alabaster) [Pallant House, Chichester] Stringed Figure 1958-60 (bronze & strings) [Tate Britain] Slide 11: An expression of the significance of life Henry Moore King and Queen 1952-3 (bronze) [Glenkiln Estate, Dumfries & [Tate Britain] Slide 12: A deep, strong, fundamental struggle Henry Moore Recumbent Figure 1938 (Green Hornton stone) [Tate Britain] Barbara Hepworth Mother and child 1934 (Cumberland alabaster) [Tate Britain] Slide 13: Forms conveying emotion Barbara Hepworth Ball, Plane and Hole 1936 (teak & oak) [Tate Britain] Monolith (Empyrean) 1953 (blue Irish limestone) [Kenwood House] Stringed Figure (Curlew II) 1956 (brass & strings) [Tate Britain] Slide 14: Art feeds the spirit Anthony Caro Early One Morning 1962 (painted steel & aluminium) [Tate Britain] Slide 15: Something watching Elisabeth Frink Bird 1952 (bronze) [Tate Britain] Riace I 1986-9 (bronze) [Yorkshire Sculpture Park] Goggle Head 1969 (bronze) [Ingram Collection, Woking] Prisoner 1988 (bronze) [Bristol City Museum] Slide 16: An accumulation of ideas Eduardo Paolozzi Cyclops 1957 (bronze) [Tate Britain] Michael Ayrton Arkville Minotaur 1968-9 (bronze) [Guildhall School of Music terrace, Barbican] Slide 17: A kind of semi-organised flux Cornelia Parker Cold, Dark Matter ~ An Exploded View 1991 [Tate Britain] Antony Gormley Quantum Cloud 2000 (steel) [River Thames, Greenwich] Slide 18: To push and move and grow Tony Cragg Here Today, Gone Tomorrow 2002 (stone) [Cass Sculpture Foundation, Goodwood] David Nash Black Dome 1986 (charred oak) [Forest of Dean, Glos.] Andy Goldsworthy Ice Spiral (Treesoul) 1988 (river ice, tree, leaves and snow) [created Dumfriesshire, Scotland; ephemeral] Slide 18: An instrument for thinking Jacob Epstein Jacob and the Angel 1940-41 (alabaster) [Tate Britain] Antony Gormley Angel of the North 1995-8 (steel & concrete) [Gateshead] Slide 19: Sufficient explanation in itself Barbara Hepworth Conversation with Magic Stones 1973 (bronze) [Tate Gallery ~ Hepworth Museum, St Ives] FINAL THOUGHTS: My sculpture is sufficient explanation in itself. (Jacob Epstein) A sculpture might, and sculptures do, reside in emptiness, but nothing happens until the living human encounters the image. (Barbara Hepworth) Art is an instrument for thinking. (Antony Gormley).
Recommended publications
  • Rhodes Memorial the Immense and Brooding Spirit Still Shall Quicken and Control
    FREE Please support our advertisers who make this free guide possible PLEASE TIP Cape Town EMPOWERMENT VENDORS GATEWAYGUIDES Rhodes Memorial The immense and brooding spirit still shall quicken and control. Living he was the land, and dead, his soul shall be her soul! Muizenberg Rhodes Memorial Rudyard Kipling 1 False Bay To advertise here contact Hayley Burger: 021 487 1200 • [email protected] Earl Grey, the Colonial Secretary, Rhodes did not ‘miss the bus’ as Neville Chamberlain said; he started 100 YEAR proposed a massive statue of a company, ‘The Gold Fields of South Africa Ltd’. His next move was to Cape Point ANNIVERSARY a human figure on the summit turn over all properties and interests to shareholders to run the business, 2012 of Signal Hill, overlooking Cape and in return, Rhodes and his partner, Charles Rudd, would receive Town, that would rival the statue a ‘founders share’ which was two-fifteenths of the profits. This of Christ in Rio de Janeiro and the worked out to up to 400,000 pounds a year. The shareholders, Statue of Liberty in New York. The after a number of years, resented this arrangement - as a idea was met with horror and was result, Rhodes became a ordinary shareholder with a total squashed immediately. The figure of 1,300,000 pounds worth of shares. He also invested in was to be of Cecil John Rhodes, other profitable mining companies on the Rand. In 1890, a man of no royalty, neither hero the first disaster hit the gold industry. As the mines 2 nor saviour; so, who was this became deeper, they hit a layer of rock containing To advertise here contact Hayley Burger: man and what did he do that a pyrites which retarded the then recovery process.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Abstract' Portraits
    ‘Abstract’ portraits A learning resource featuring works from the National Portrait Gallery Collection, one of a series focusing on particular artists or themes which has changed the way we think about the art of portraiture. Page 2 of 16 National Portrait Gallery ‘Abstract’ portraits Contents Introduction ⁄ 2 1: A conceptual portrait ⁄ 3 2: Dominant features ⁄ 6 3: Mixed media and text ⁄ 8 4: Pattern and form ⁄ 10 5: Mass and material ⁄ 12 General enquiry questions ⁄ 14 Further research ⁄ 15 Introduction This resource looks at the broad themes encapsulated in the idea of an ‘abstracted’ portrait and questions whether such a portrait is possible and viable. A variety of themes group different types of portraits that could be termed ‘abstract’. The portraits selected in this resource are all in the Collection of the National Portrait Gallery. The resource is aimed primarily at teachers of pupils studying GCSE and A level art. Those studying art history may also find the images, concepts and discussions of relevance to their study. The content aims to give teachers information on the significance and stories of the sitter and artist, the purpose of the image and its impact at the time, and to examine connections between those sitters, artists and their images. The general enquiry questions together with themes and ideas for further discussion between teachers and students are designed to encourage ways to research, develop and record ideas and personal responses. Finally, there are web links for additional research. This resource complements and supports the learning programmes developed by the National Portrait Gallery. ‘Abstract’ portraits in context Can men and women be represented in ‘abstract ways’? Is the essential function of a portrait that it communicates what the sitter looks like and that it can be used for identity purposes? If this factor is subverted and the portrait no longer has this function, can it be true to the genre? Recognisable features from distinctive and famous faces can help make an ‘abstract’ portrait look more realistic and believable.
    [Show full text]
  • Dante Gabriel Rossetti and the Italian Renaissance: Envisioning Aesthetic Beauty and the Past Through Images of Women
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2010 DANTE GABRIEL ROSSETTI AND THE ITALIAN RENAISSANCE: ENVISIONING AESTHETIC BEAUTY AND THE PAST THROUGH IMAGES OF WOMEN Carolyn Porter Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/113 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Carolyn Elizabeth Porter 2010 All Rights Reserved “DANTE GABRIEL ROSSETTI AND THE ITALIAN RENAISSANCE: ENVISIONING AESTHETIC BEAUTY AND THE PAST THROUGH IMAGES OF WOMEN” A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Virginia Commonwealth University. by CAROLYN ELIZABETH PORTER Master of Arts, Virginia Commonwealth University, 2007 Bachelor of Arts, Furman University, 2004 Director: ERIC GARBERSON ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF ART HISTORY Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia August 2010 Acknowledgements I owe a huge debt of gratitude to many individuals and institutions that have helped this project along for many years. Without their generous support in the form of financial assistance, sound professional advice, and unyielding personal encouragement, completing my research would not have been possible. I have been fortunate to receive funding to undertake the years of work necessary for this project. Much of my assistance has come from Virginia Commonwealth University. I am thankful for several assistantships and travel funding from the Department of Art History, a travel grant from the School of the Arts, a Doctoral Assistantship from the School of Graduate Studies, and a Dissertation Writing Assistantship from the university.
    [Show full text]
  • HENRY MOORE: Late Large Forms
    G A G O S I A N G A L L E R Y November 26, 2012 PRESS RELEASE GAGOSIAN GALLERY 522 WEST 21ST STREET T. 212.741.1717 NEW YORK, NY 10011 F. 212.741.0006 GALLERY HOURS: Tue–Sat: 10:00am–6:00pm HENRY MOORE: Late Large Forms Tuesday, November 20, 2012–Saturday, January 19, 2013 Everything I do, I intend to make on a large scale... Size itself has its own impact, and physically we can relate more strongly to a big sculpture than to a small one. —Henry Moore Gagosian Gallery, in collaboration with The Henry Moore Foundation, is pleased to present a major exhibition of large-scale sculptures by Henry Moore, which opened at Larry Gagosian’s Britannia Street location in London earlier this year. A pioneer of modern British sculpture, Moore engaged the abstract, the surreal, the primitive and the classical in vigorous corporeal forms that are as accessible and familiar as they are avant- garde. His monumental sculptures celebrated the power of organic forms at a time when traditional representation was largely eschewed by the vanguard art establishment. The overwhelming physicality of their scale and forceful presence promotes a charged relation between sculpture, site and viewer. Reclining Figure: Hand (1979) is immediately identifiable as a human form despite its modulated stylization. The rounded, cloud-like body, which contrasts with a “knife-edge” head derived from bird bone, attests to Moore’s more exploratory impulses when compared to Reclining Connected Forms (1969), where he alludes to body parts using the vocabulary of mechanical components.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 21 2012/13: a Julia Margaret Cameron Photo Album
    Case 21 2012/13: A Julia Margaret Cameron Photo Album Expert adviser’s statement Reviewing Committee Secretary’s note: Please note that any illustrations referred to have not been reproduced on the Arts Council England Website SUMMARY OF WORK Julia Margaret Cameron (1815-1879) – (Compiler) THE "SIGNOR 1857" ALBUM, 1857 Sotheby’s Sale L12408, 12 December, 2012, Lot 65) 35 photographs by various photographers, including Cameron, Reginald Southey, Rejlander, and 2nd Earl Brownlow, all mounted individually on within an album (one leaf now loose), comprising 3 salted paper prints and 32 albumen prints, 24 images with later inscriptions in pencil by Mary Seton Watts identifying the sitters and occasionally with other notes, one inscription in ink by George Frederic Watts, a few annotations by Julia Margaret Cameron, and with further pencil inscriptions in two further hands, one providing children’s ages, the other identifying sitters, also with a later inscription on the front pastedown giving an (incorrect) summary of the content, four stubs, one page with adhesive residue where a photograph or other insertion has apparently been removed, 35 pages, plus blanks, 4to (246 x 197mm), green morocco, marbled endpapers, gilt borders and gilt stamped on upper cover “Signor.1857”. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Julia Margaret Cameron (1815-1879) was one of the greatest nineteenth century artists in any medium and one of the greatest photographers that Britain has ever produced. She took her first photograph in 1864 but was actively involved with photography prior to this, compiling a number of albums. The Signor 1857 album is the earliest of eight recorded photographic albums assembled by Cameron in the period before she took up photography herself.
    [Show full text]
  • Fallen Woman Or Fallen Man? Representations of Moral
    XVIII Fallen Woman or Fallen Man? Representations of moral responsibility, punishment and reward in George Frederic Watts’s painting Found Drowned (1848-50) and Charles Dickens’s novel Our Mutual Friend (1864-5). SUSAN KNIGHTS This article will examine gendered representations of moral responsibility by comparing its treatment of fallen women in the above artefacts. George Frederic Watts evinces sympathy and condemnation for the plight of a drowned woman, alone bearing the punishment for her fall from prevalent societal expectations of female behaviour. Charles Dickens appears to go further in challenging the distribution of moral responsibility, inverting the stereotypic trope of the fallen woman by instead punishing a fallen man for his moral failure. Both artefacts, however, remain trapped in the dominant cultural model of the time, with its privileging of the patriarchal home as the best protector of female propriety. They thus re-enforce stereotypic inscriptions of gender. Read together as social documents, they reflect a society in transition, in which attitudes towards morality, class and gender, far from being universal and absolute, were fraught with paradox, uncertainty and ambivalence. he Victorians were much exercised by perceived essentialist gender differences, Tadvocating separate public or private spheres for men and women even as a burgeoning urban female workforce increasingly complicated strict delineations. Traditionally, women were expected to maintain the highest moral standards, but were disproportionately castigated
    [Show full text]
  • Sheila Watson Fonds Finding Guide
    SHEILA WATSON FONDS FINDING GUIDE SPECIAL COLLECTIONS JOHN M. KELLY LIBRARY | UNIVERSITY OF ST. MICHAEL’S COLLEGE 113 ST. JOSEPH STREET TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA M5S 1J4 ARRANGED AND DESCRIBED BY ANNA ST.ONGE CONTRACT ARCHIVIST JUNE 2007 (LAST UPDATED SEPTEMBER 2012) TABLE OF CONTENTS TAB Part I : Fonds – level description…………………………………………………………A Biographical Sketch HiStory of the Sheila WatSon fondS Extent of fondS DeScription of PaperS AcceSS, copyright and publiShing reStrictionS Note on Arrangement of materialS Related materialS from other fondS and Special collectionS Part II : Series – level descriptions………………………………………………………..B SerieS 1.0. DiarieS, reading journalS and day plannerS………………………………………...1 FileS 2006 01 01 – 2006 01 29 SerieS 2.0 ManuScriptS and draftS……………………………………………………………2 Sub-SerieS 2.1. NovelS Sub-SerieS 2.2. Short StorieS Sub-SerieS 2.3. Poetry Sub-SerieS 2.4. Non-fiction SerieS 3.0 General correSpondence…………………………………………………………..3 Sub-SerieS 3.1. Outgoing correSpondence Sub-SerieS 3.2. Incoming correSpondence SerieS 4.0 PubliShing records and buSineSS correSpondence………………………………….4 SerieS 5.0 ProfeSSional activitieS materialS……………………………………………………5 Sub-SerieS 5.1. Editorial, collaborative and contributive materialS Sub-SerieS 5.2. Canada Council paperS Sub-SerieS 5.3. Public readingS, interviewS and conference material SerieS 6.0 Student material…………………………………………………………………...6 SerieS 7.0 Teaching material………………………………………………………………….7 Sub-SerieS 7.1. Elementary and secondary school teaching material Sub-SerieS 7.2. UniverSity of BritiSh Columbia teaching material Sub-SerieS 7.3. UniverSity of Toronto teaching material Sub-SerieS 7.4. UniverSity of Alberta teaching material Sub-SerieS 7.5. PoSt-retirement teaching material SerieS 8.0 Research and reference materialS…………………………………………………..8 Sub-serieS 8.1.
    [Show full text]
  • 19Th Century European Paintings I New York I November 7, 2018 24960
    New York I November 7, 2018 New York 19th Century European Paintings European 19th Century 19th Century European Paintings I New York I November 7, 2018 24960 19th Century European Paintings New York | Wednesday 7 November 2018, at 2pm BONHAMS BIDS INQUIRIES ILLUSTRATIONS 580 Madison Avenue +1 (212) 644 9001 Mark Fisher, Director Front cover: Lot 53 New York, New York 10022 +1 (212) 644 9009 fax +1 (323) 436 5488 Inside front cover: Lot 26 bonhams.com [email protected] [email protected] Facing page: Lot 41 Back cover: Lot 34 PREVIEW To bid via the internet please Madalina Lazen, Director Inside back cover: Lot 21 Saturday 3 November 12-5pm visit www.bonhams.com/24960 +1 (212) 644 9108 Index ghost image: Lot 32 Sunday 4 November 12-5pm [email protected] Monday 5 November 10am-5pm Please note that telephone bids REGISTRATION Tuesday 6 November 10am-5pm must be submitted no later Rocco Rich, Specialist IMPORTANT NOTICE than 4pm on the day prior to +1 (323) 436 5410 Please note that all customers, the auction. New bidders must [email protected] SALE NUMBER: 24960 irrespective of any previous activity also provide proof of identity with Bonhams, are required to and address when submitting London complete the Bidder Registration CATALOG: $35 bids. Telephone bidding is only Charles O’Brien Form in advance of the sale. The available for lots with a low +44 (0) 20 7468 8360 form can be found at the back estimate in excess of $1000. [email protected] of every catalogue and on our website at www.bonhams.com Please contact client services Peter Rees and should be returned by email or with any bidding inquiries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Henry Moore Foundation Review Contents
    Issue Number Fifteen Winter 2006 The Henry Moore Foundation Review Contents 3 Chairman’s Introduction Sir Ewen Fergusson 4 Director’s Report Tim Llewellyn 7 Financial Statement 2005 – 2006 8 Henry Moore Collections and Exhibitions Anita Feldman Bennet 11 Restoration of Hoglands David Mitchinson 12 Henry Moore Institute Penelope Curtis 15 Publishing Sculpture Studies at the Henry Moore Institute Martina Droth 16 Grants Programme 20 Publications 23 General Information Front Cover: Sheep Piece 1971–72 (LH 627) at Perry Green. Photo: Michael Phipps Tim Llewellyn in 1994 with Moore’s Large Figure in a Shelter 1985– 86 (LH 652c). Photo: Michel Muller Chairman’s Introduction This year has been rich in achievements and there is much Whatever has been achieved over the past year, I must to excite us for the future, but I start with the bad news. now look ahead to a most significant event. Next May, after While last year’s Review was being printed, thieves succeeded thirteen years of extraordinary activity on behalf of the in stealing a large bronze from Perry Green. No trace has Foundation, Timothy Llewellyn will be retiring from the since been found. It is hard to imagine a motive for this post of Director. audacious crime, which inevitably has influenced the Tim Llewellyn came to the Foundation early in 1994 conditions under which we and others will be able to show after a highly successful career at Sotheby’s. He brought sculpture to the public in the future. with him experience in management, a knowledge of finan- In spite of this discouraging beginning, the year has seen cial affairs and, above all, a genuine feel for works of art, many exciting projects brought to fruition, including the historic and contemporary.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Raphaelite List John Everett Millais, Christina Rossetti, Dante Gabriel Rossetti, William Michael Rossetti, George Frederic Watts, Thomas Woolner
    Pre-Raphaelite List John Everett Millais, Christina Rossetti, Dante Gabriel Rossetti, William Michael Rossetti, George Frederic Watts, Thomas Woolner, Also includes: General Reference & Friends of the Pre-Raphaelites John Everett Millais English painter and illustrator Sir J. E. Millais (1829 - 1896) is credited with founding the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood along with D.G. Rossetti and William Holman Hunt in 1848. An artistic prodigy, he entered the Royal Academy at age eleven, the youngest student to enroll. He later became one of the wealthiest artists of the time. 1. Reid, J. Eadie. Sir J. E. Millais, P.R.A. London: The Walter Scott Publishing Co., Ltd, 1909. Illustrated with 20 plates and a photogravure frontispiece. Focusing on the biographical details and artworks of Millais, this book describes his involvement with the Pre-Raphaelites, portrait paintings, landscape paintings, ailments, travel, and more. Bound in full blue leather prize binding with the Watford Grammar School’s insignia in bright gilt on the front board. Red leather title label with gilt title to spine. Gilt decoration and raised bands to spine. Gilt rules to edges of boards and embossed turn-ins. Minor rubbing to hinges, spine ends, raised bands, and edges of boards. Marbled paper end pages and marbled edges. A certificate stating that this book was awarded to C.T. Sharman for drawing in July 1910 is affixed to the front pastedown. There are a few spots of foxing to the interior, else very clean. An attractive book. Appendices and Index, 193 pages. In very good condition. (#22060) $100 2. Trollope, Anthony Illustrated by, J.E.
    [Show full text]
  • George Frederic WATTS (London 1817 - Compton 1904)
    George Frederic WATTS (London 1817 - Compton 1904) Vesuvius Watercolour and gouache on blue-grey paper, laid down. Inscribed Naples in pencil on the verso. 72 x 145 mm. (2 7/8 x 5 3/4 in.) [sheet] The four years that Watts spent in Italy in the 1840s were crucial to his artistic development. As Barbara Bryant has noted of this period, ‘Landscape painting first engaged Watts during this time in Italy and it continued to feature in his work ever after…Travel often prompted him to turn to landscape; one visitor to his studio observed that he ‘filled his portfolios with precious memories of foreign lands’…For Watts such landscape studies provided the raw materials for his imagination.’ Artist description: One of the most famous artists of his day, George Frederic Watts followed a childhood apprenticeship in the studio of the sculptor William Behnes with studies at the Royal Academy Schools. His early years as an independent artist were largely devoted to portraiture, and among his first significant patrons was the Anglo-Greek merchant Alexander Constantine Ionides. In 1843 he travelled to Italy and spent the next four years living and working in Florence, where his first hosts were Lord and Lady Holland, and also visited Perugia, Milan, Rome and Naples. Back in London in 1847, Watts continued to paint both history subjects and portraits, and enjoyed considerable commercial success, aided by his association with a large circle of eminent and influential society patrons. In 1852 he won a commission for a fresco for the new Palace of Westminster.
    [Show full text]
  • “Uproar!”: the Early Years of the London Group, 1913–28 Sarah Macdougall
    “Uproar!”: The early years of The London Group, 1913–28 Sarah MacDougall From its explosive arrival on the British art scene in 1913 as a radical alternative to the art establishment, the early history of The London Group was one of noisy dissent. Its controversial early years reflect the upheavals associated with the introduction of British modernism and the experimental work of many of its early members. Although its first two exhibitions have been seen with hindsight as ‘triumphs of collective action’,1 ironically, the Group’s very success in bringing together such disparate artistic factions as the English ‘Cubists’ and the Camden Town painters only underlined the fragility of their union – a union that was further threatened, even before the end of the first exhibition, by the early death of Camden Town Group President, Spencer Gore. Roger Fry observed at The London Group’s formation how ‘almost all artist groups’, were, ‘like the protozoa […] fissiparous and breed by division. They show their vitality by the frequency with which they split up’. While predicting it would last only two or three years, he also acknowledged how the Group had come ‘together for the needs of life of two quite separate organisms, which give each other mutual support in an unkindly world’.2 In its first five decades this mutual support was, in truth, short-lived, as ‘Uproar’ raged on many fronts both inside and outside the Group. These fronts included the hostile press reception of the ultra-modernists; the rivalry between the Group and contemporary artists’
    [Show full text]