DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 Shell Annual Report and Form 20-F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016 Shell Annual Report and Form 20-F ANNUAL REPORT Royal Dutch Shell plc Annual Report and Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 CONTENTS 01 104 INTRODUCTION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 01 Form 20-F AND SUPPLEMENTS 02 Cross reference to Form 20-F 104 Independent Auditors’ Reports related 04 Terms and abbreviations to the Consolidated and Parent Company 05 About this Report Financial Statements 117 Consolidated Financial Statements 06 153 Supplementary information – oil and gas STRATEGIC REPORT (unaudited) 171 Parent Company Financial Statements 06 Chair’s message 180 Independent Auditors’ Reports related 07 Chief Executive Officer’s review to the Royal Dutch Shell Dividend Access 08 Strategy and outlook Trust Financial Statements 10 Business overview 183 Royal Dutch Shell Dividend Access Trust 12 Risk factors Financial Statements 16 Market overview 18 Summary of results 20 Performance indicators 187 22 Integrated Gas ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 27 Upstream 187 Shareholder information 33 Oil and gas information 194 Section 13(r) of the US Securities 41 Downstream Exchange Act of 1934 disclosure 48 Corporate 195 Non-GAAP measures reconciliations 49 Liquidity and capital resources 197 Index to the Exhibits 53 Environment and society 198 Signatures 59 Our people E1 Exhibits 61 GOVERNANCE Cover image 61 The Board of Royal Dutch Shell plc 63 Senior Management The cover shows how Shell works 64 Directors’ Report with innovators, communities, 67 customers and partners worldwide Corporate governance to provide more and cleaner energy 79 Audit Committee Report solutions. 82 Directors’ Remuneration Report Designed by Conran Design Group carbon neutral natureOffice.com | NL-001-379387 Typeset by Donnelley Financial Solutions print production Printed by Tuijtel under ISO 14001 01. IFC and IBC Cover.indd 1 16/03/2017 12:17:06 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 Commission file number 001-32575 Royal Dutch Shell plc (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) England and Wales (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organisation) Carel van Bylandtlaan 30, 2596 HR, The Hague, The Netherlands Tel. no: 011 31 70 377 9111 royaldutchshell.shareholders@shell.com (Address of principal executive offices) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered American Depositary Shares representing two A ordinary shares New York Stock Exchange of the issuer with a nominal value of €0.07 each American Depositary Shares representing two B ordinary shares New York Stock Exchange of the issuer with a nominal value of €0.07 each 1.125% Guaranteed Notes due 2017 New York Stock Exchange 1.25% Guaranteed Notes due 2017 New York Stock Exchange 5.2% Guaranteed Notes due 2017 New York Stock Exchange Floating Rate Guaranteed Notes due 2017 New York Stock Exchange 1.625% Guaranteed Notes due 2018 New York Stock Exchange 1.9% Guaranteed Notes due 2018 New York Stock Exchange 2.0% Guaranteed Notes due 2018 New York Stock Exchange Floating Rate Guaranteed Notes due 2018 New York Stock Exchange 1.375% Guaranteed Notes due May 2019 New York Stock Exchange 1.375% Guaranteed Notes due September 2019 New York Stock Exchange 4.3% Guaranteed Notes due 2019 New York Stock Exchange Floating Rate Guaranteed Notes due 2019 New York Stock Exchange 2.125% Guaranteed Notes due 2020 New York Stock Exchange 2.25% Guaranteed Notes due 2020 New York Stock Exchange 4.375% Guaranteed Notes due 2020 New York Stock Exchange Floating Rate Guaranteed Notes due 2020 New York Stock Exchange 1.75% Guaranteed Notes due 2021 New York Stock Exchange 1.875% Guaranteed Notes due 2021 New York Stock Exchange 2.375% Guaranteed Notes due 2022 New York Stock Exchange 2.25% Guaranteed Notes due 2023 New York Stock Exchange 3.4% Guaranteed Notes due 2023 New York Stock Exchange 3.25% Guaranteed Notes due 2025 New York Stock Exchange 2.5% Guaranteed Notes due 2026 New York Stock Exchange 2.875% Guaranteed Notes due 2026 New York Stock Exchange 4.125% Guaranteed Notes due 2035 New York Stock Exchange 6.375% Guaranteed Notes due 2038 New York Stock Exchange 5.5% Guaranteed Notes due 2040 New York Stock Exchange 3.625% Guaranteed Notes due 2042 New York Stock Exchange 4.55% Guaranteed Notes due 2043 New York Stock Exchange 4.375% Guaranteed Notes due 2045 New York Stock Exchange 3.75% Guaranteed Notes due 2046 New York Stock Exchange 4.00% Guaranteed Notes due 2046 New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: none Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: none Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report. Outstanding as of December 31, 2016: 4,406,063,759 A ordinary shares with a nominal value of €0.07 each. 3,739,277,889 B ordinary shares with a nominal value of €0.07 each. P Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to P Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such P reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) P during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer ✓P Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing: P U.S. GAAP International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Other If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 Item 18 If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the P Exchange Act). Yes No Copies of notices and communications from the Securities and Exchange Commission should be sent to: Royal Dutch Shell plc Carel van Bylandtlaan 30 2596 HR, The Hague, The Netherlands Attn: Linda M. Szymanski CROSS REFERENCE TO FORM 20-F Part I Pages Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers N/A Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable N/A Item 3. Key Information A. Selected financial data 19, 189 B. Capitalisation and indebtedness 49-52 C. Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds N/A D. Risk factors 12-15 Item 4. Information on the Company A. History and development of the company 8, 10, 18, 22-32, 41-44, 50-52, 187, 195 B. Business overview 8-19, 22-48, 53-58, 153-161, 168-170, 194 C. Organisational structure 10, E1-E19 D. Property, plant and equipment 8-9, 12-15, 18-19, 22-47, 53-58, 153-170 Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments N/A Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects A. Operating results 12-15, 18-48, 143-148 B. Liquidity and capital resources 8-9, 18-19, 22-23, 27-28, 41-42, 49-52, 126-127, 136-138, 143-148, 176 C. Research and development, patents and licences, etc. 11 D. Trend information 8-9, 12-15, 16-21, 22-25, 27-32, 41-44 E. Off-balance sheet arrangements 52 F. Tabular disclosure of contractual obligations 52 G. Safe harbour 52 Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees A. Directors and senior management 61- 63, 68-71 B. Compensation 85-95 C. Board practices 61-63, 67-72, 79-81, 85, 94-95, 101-102 D. Employees 59, 151 E. Share ownership 59-60, 82-103, 148-149, 187 Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions A. Major shareholders 187-188 B. Related party transactions 65, 124, 134, 151-152, 178-179, 186 C. Interests of experts and counsel N/A Item 8. Financial Information A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information 49-52, 104-152, 171-186 B. Significant changes 11, 6 4 - 6 6 Item 9. The Offer and Listing A. Offer and listing details 190 B. Plan of distribution N/A C. Markets 187 D. Selling shareholders N/A E. Dilution N/A F. Expenses of the issue N/A Item 10. Additional Information A. Share capital 49, 59-60, 66, 90-92, 120, 148-149, 173, 176-177, 185, 187 B. Memorandum and articles of association 72-78 C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conversion Strategies for Dutch Primary Schools: Practice and Refinement
    Journal of Architecture and Urbanism ISSN 2029-7955 / eISSN 2029-7947 2020 Volume 44 Issue 1: 69–77 https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2020.11448 CONVERSION STRATEGIES FOR DUTCH PRIMARY SCHOOLS: PRACTICE AND REFINEMENT 1* 2 Dolf BROEKHUIZEN , Monique ARKESTEIJN , Peter de JONG 3, Frido van NIEUWAMERONGEN 4 1 Dolf Broekhuizen Architecture Historian, Rotterdam, the Netherlands 2, 3 Department of Management in the Built Environment, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands 4Arconiko, Rotterdam, the Netherlands Received 31 October 2019; accepted 11 June 2020 Abstract. Handbooks on strategic real estate management are generally based on four strategies for functional adjustment of the building: conversion, expansion, renovation and adaptive reuse. And on a strategic level, this classification in adjust- ment strategies does work for real estate in general. But when looking at Dutch primary schools as a specific type of real estate, reality can be and is more nuanced. Other accommodation strategies came to the fore in a study into the spatial adaptation of primary schools and children’s centres in the Netherlands. An analysis of 100 school buildings studied in the Atlas of School Building (published in Dutch as Scholenbouwatlas) revealed that nine main strategies were prevalent in prac- tice. This refinement of the strategies fits (better) with integrated conversion actions of primary schools in which several aspects are solved together. In the following article these strategies are analysed and discussed in a theoretical context. The conclusion of the analyses is that the existing general models in the strategic handling of the building stock in the case of specific real estate of primary schools can be refined.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Practice Collection Civil Society Involvement in Drug Policy
    csidp Good Practice Collection Civil Society Involvement in Drug Policy csidp Good Practice Collection Colophon This Good Practice Collection is developed in the framework of the European Civil Society Involvement Project – CSIDP, with financial support of the European Union. More information via: www.csidp.eu csidp Authors: Susanna Ronconi, Lelle Casmaro, Marcus Kea- ne, Diana Castro, Matej Košir, Anna Lyubenova, Roberto Perez Gayo Support: All partners of the CSFD Project – De Regenboog Groep (NL), Ana Liffey Foundation, (Ireland), Forum Drogue and LILA (Italy), APDES (Portugal), UTRIP (Slovenia) Initiative for Health (Bulgaria) Copyright © 2018 Copyright remains with the publisher De Regenboog Groep / Correlation Network PO Box 10887 1001 EW Amsterdam Correlation The Netherlands Euroean ar edction Phone: +31 20 5707829 C etor administration@correlation-net.org www.correlation-net.org This publication has been produced with the financial support of the Migration and Home Affairs Programme of the European Union (Home/2015/JDRU/AG/DRUG/8842). The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Correlation and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Commission. 2 Good Practice Collection csidp Contents 1. Bulgaria 4 1.1. An example of strategic cooperation: Setting up a working group to discuss a platform for change in drug policy in Bulgaria 4 1.2. An example of media advocacy actions: Advocacy for medical cannabis in Bulgaria 5 2. Ireland 8 2.1. An example of CSO leadership: Supporting the implementation of supervised injecting facilities in Ireland 8 2.2. An example of a coalition: CityWide and Decriminalisation in Ireland 8 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • To Arrive at the Total Scores, Each Company Is Marked out of 10 Across
    BRITAIN’S MOST ADMIRED COMPANIES THE RESULTS 17th last year as it continues to do well in the growing LNG business, especially in Australia and Brazil. Veteran chief executive Frank Chapman is due to step down in the new year, and in October a row about overstated reserves hit the share price. Some pundits To arrive at the total scores, each company is reckon BG could become a take over target as a result. The biggest climber in the top 10 this year is marked out of 10 across nine criteria, such as quality Petrofac, up to fifth from 68th last year. The oilfield of management, value as a long-term investment, services group may not be as well known as some, but it is doing great business all the same. Its boss, Syrian- financial soundness and capacity to innovate. Here born Ayman Asfari, is one of the growing band of are the top 10 firms by these individual measures wealthy foreign entrepreneurs who choose to make London their operating base and home, to the benefit of both the Exchequer and the employment figures. In fourth place is Rolls-Royce, one of BMAC’s most Financial value as a long-term community and environmental soundness investment responsibility consistent high performers. Hardly a year goes past that it does not feature in the upper reaches of our table, 1= Rightmove 9.00 1 Diageo 8.61 1 Co-operative Bank 8.00 and it has topped its sector – aero and defence engi- 1= Rotork 9.00 2 Berkeley Group 8.40 2 BASF (UK & Ireland) 7.61 neering – for a decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing for Carbon Pricing: Case Studies from Company Experience
    TECHNICAL NOTE 9 | JANUARY 2015 Preparing for Carbon Pricing Case Studies from Company Experience: Royal Dutch Shell, Rio Tinto, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Acknowledgments and Methodology This Technical Note was prepared for the PMR Secretariat by Janet Peace, Tim Juliani, Anthony Mansell, and Jason Ye (Center for Climate and Energy Solutions—C2ES), with input and supervision from Pierre Guigon and Sarah Moyer (PMR Secretariat). The note comprises case studies with three companies: Royal Dutch Shell, Rio Tinto, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E). All three have operated in jurisdictions where carbon emissions are regulated. This note captures their experiences and lessons learned preparing for and operating under policies that price carbon emissions. The following information sources were used during the research for these case studies: 1. Interviews conducted between February and October 2014 with current and former employees who had first-hand knowledge of these companies’ activities related to preparing for and operating under carbon pricing regulation. 2. Publicly available resources, including corporate sustainability reports, annual reports, and Carbon Disclosure Project responses. 3. Internal company review of the draft case studies. 4. C2ES’s history of engagement with corporations on carbon pricing policies. Early insights from this research were presented at a business-government dialogue co-hosted by the PMR, the International Finance Corporation, and the Business-PMR of the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) in Cologne, Germany, in May 2014. Feedback from that event has also been incorporated into the final version. We would like to acknowledge experts at Royal Dutch Shell, Rio Tinto, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)—among whom Laurel Green, David Hone, Sue Lacey and Neil Marshman—for their collaboration and for sharing insights during the preparation of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • BP Code of Conduct – English
    Our Code Our responsibility Code of Conduct Guiding you to make the right decisions Our values and behaviours are the foundation of our Code What we value Safety Safety is good business. Everything we do relies upon the safety of our workforce and the communities around us. We care about the safe management of the environment. We are committed to safely delivering energy to the world. Respect We respect the world in which we operate. It begins with compliance with laws and regulations. We hold ourselves to the highest ethical standards and behave in ways that earn the trust of others. We depend on the relationships we have and respect each other and those we work with. We value diversity of people and thought. We care about the consequences of our decisions, large and small, on those around us. Excellence We are in a hazardous business and are committed to excellence through the systematic and disciplined management of our operations. We follow and uphold the rules and standards we set for our company. We commit to quality outcomes, have a thirst to learn and to improve. If something is not right, we correct it. Courage What we do is rarely easy. Achieving the best outcomes often requires the courage to face difficulty, to speak up and stand by what we believe. We always strive to do the right thing. We explore new ways of thinking and are unafraid to ask for help. We are honest with ourselves and actively seek feedback from others. We aim for an enduring legacy, despite the short-term priorities of our world.
    [Show full text]
  • 19-1189 BP PLC V. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus BP P. L. C. ET AL. v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19–1189. Argued January 19, 2021—Decided May 17, 2021 Baltimore’s Mayor and City Council (collectively City) sued various en- ergy companies in Maryland state court alleging that the companies concealed the environmental impacts of the fossil fuels they promoted. The defendant companies removed the case to federal court invoking a number of grounds for federal jurisdiction, including the federal officer removal statute, 28 U. S. C. §1442. The City argued that none of the defendants’ various grounds for removal justified retaining federal ju- risdiction, and the district court agreed, issuing an order remanding the case back to state court. Although an order remanding a case to state court is ordinarily unreviewable on appeal, Congress has deter- mined that appellate review is available for those orders “remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed pursuant to section 1442 or 1443 of [Title 28].” §1447(d). The Fourth Circuit read this provision to authorize appellate review only for the part of a remand order deciding the §1442 or §1443 removal ground.
    [Show full text]
  • BP Plc Vs Royal Dutch Shell
    FEBRUARY 2021 BP plc Vs Royal Dutch Shell 01872 229 000 www.atlanticmarkets.co.uk www.atlanticmarkets.co.uk BP Plc A Brief History BP is a British multinational oil and gas company headquartered in London. It is one of the world’s oil and gas supermajors. · 1908. The founding of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, established as a subsidiary of Burmah Oil Company to take advantage of oil discoveries in Iran. · 1935. It became the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company · 1954. Adopted the name British Petroleum. · 1959. The company expanded beyond the Middle East to Alaska and it was one of the first companies to strike oil in the North Sea. · 1978. British Petroleum acquired majority control of Standard Oil of Ohio. Formerly majority state-owned. · 1979–1987. The British government privatised the company in stages between. · 1998. British Petroleum merged with Amoco, becoming BP Amoco plc, · 2000-2001. Acquired ARCO and Burmah Castrol, becoming BP plc. · 2003–2013. BP was a partner in the TNK-BP joint venture in Russia. Positioning BP is a “vertically integrated” company, meaning it’s involved in the whole supply chain – from discovering oil, producing it, refining it, shipping it, trading it and selling it at the petrol pump. BP has operations in nearly 80 countries worldwide and has around 18,700 service stations worldwide. Its largest division is BP America. In Russia, BP also own a 19.75% stake in Rosneft, the world’s largest publicly traded oil and gas company by hydrocarbon reserves and production. BP has a primary listing on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 100 Index.
    [Show full text]
  • The Netherlands' National Air Pollution Control Programme (NAPCP-NL)
    The Netherlands’ national air pollution control programme (NAPCP-NL) This NAPCP has been drawn up in accordance with Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1522 of 11 October 2018 laying down a common format for national air pollution control programmes in accordance with article 6 of Directive (EU) 2016/2284 1. FIELD DESCRIPTIONS All fields in this common format that are marked (M) are mandatory and those marked (O) are optional. 2 COMMON FORMAT 2.1 Title of the programme, contact information and websites 2.1.1. Title of the programme, contact information and websites (M) Title of the programme: NAPCP-NL Date: 29 March 2019 Member State: The Netherlands Name of competent authority responsible for drawing up the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management AVT19/IW127934A 1 programme: Telephone number of responsible service: - Email address of responsible service: - Link to website where the programme is published: www.rijksoverheid.nl and www.platformparticipatie.nl/nec Link(s) to website(s) on the consultation(s) on the programme: www.platformparticipatie.nl/nec 2.2 Executive summary Background Over the past 20 years, partly as a result of EU policy, Europe has seen a significant improvement in anthropogenic atmospheric emissions and air quality. Directive 2001/81/EC on national emission ceilings for certain atmospheric pollutants (NECD) has been instrumental in that progress by setting limits for 2010 onwards. As set out in the 7th Environment Action Programme, the European Union is aiming to achieve levels of air quality that do not give rise to significant negative impacts on, and risks to, human health and the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Terms and Conditions
    Domestic Terms and Conditions Energy and telecoms supply terms (domestic) ALL SERVICES WARNING: Your attention is drawn to clause 17, Data Protection, which sets out the way in which we may use your personal data and the people we may disclose it to. If you do not wish us to disclose your personal information to our approved partners as referred to in clause 17.1 please contact customer services on 01926 320 700 if you are a utilities customer or 01926 320 701 if you are a Telecoms customer. 1. Introduction These terms and conditions apply if you are a customer using our gas, electricity, telecoms and/or broadband services at your domestic premises at which a supply is taken wholly or mainly for domestic purposes. You must inform us if you start using your property for business purposes and we will provide you with an alternative contract. Please read the terms and conditions carefully so that you fully understand your commitments and our obligations. No contract will be formed between us until we receive your acceptance of our quotation in writing, online or verbally (where you are subscribing for the services online or by telephone respectively), or on the date of completion (where you are purchasing a property in a new development). If you subscribe online or by telephone and there are any problems with your application prior to us commencing the registration process we will contact you and attempt to resolve any issues. We reserve the right to reject your request on reasonable grounds. Reasonable grounds for our rejection could include but are not limited to your premises being found to have unsuitable metering equipment (for instance those offering half hourly metering) in the case of energy services, or, in the case of broadband services, that you do not have a BT telephone landline (we will test this for you using the telephone number given on your application) or your premises cannot be connected for any other technical reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Meningococcal Disease in the Netherlands Background Information for the Health Council
    Meningococcal disease in the Netherlands Background information for the Health Council RIVM Report 2017-0031 M.J.Knol et al. Meningococcal disease in the Netherlands Background information for the Health Council RIVM Report 2017-0031 RIVM Report – 2017-0031 Colophon © RIVM 2017 Parts of this publication may be reproduced, provided acknowledgement is given to: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, along with the title and year of publication. DOI 10.21945/RIVM-2017-0031 M.J. Knol (author), RIVM H.E. de Melker (author), RIVM G.A.M. Berbers (author), RIVM M.B. van Ravenhorst (author), RIVM W.L.M. Ruijs (author), RIVM J.A. van Vliet (author), RIVM J.M. Kemmeren (author), RIVM A. Suijkerbuijk (author), RIVM E.A. van Lier (author), RIVM E.A.M Sanders (author), RIVM A. van der Ende (author), Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Contact: M.J. Knol Center for Epidemiology and Surveillance of Infectious Diseases mirjam.knol@rivm.nl This investigation has been performed by order and for the account of the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport and the Health Council, within the framework of V/151103/17/EV, Surveillance of the National Immunization Programme, Meningococcal vaccination. This is a publication of: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment P.O. Box 1 | 3720 BA Bilthoven The Netherlands www.rivm.nl/en Page 2 of 55 RIVM Report – 2017-0031 Synopsis Meningococcal disease in the Netherlands Background information for the Health Council Meningococcal disease is a very serious infectious disease caused by a bacterium, the meningococcus.
    [Show full text]
  • BG Group's LNG Business
    FACT SHEET – LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS BG Group’s LNG business BG Group’s LNG activities are founded on a deep understanding of our target markets and customers, along with a unique combination of infrastructure, flexible supply, shipping capacity and marketing capabilities. We have a strong presence in all segments of the chain, from upstream exploration and production, through liquefaction, shipping and regasification, to the end market. In liquefaction, we have a track record of execution, having been materially involved in the delivery of six liquefaction trains at projects in Trinidad and Tobago and Egypt. In shipping, we have one of the largest LNG fleets of any international oil and gas company consisting of (as of March 2012) around 25 owned or chartered modern vessels that are able to meet BG Group LNG sales terminal equity and/or capacity BG Group LNG sales terminal short/medium term BG Group LNG long term contracted sources BG Group LNG short term sources the needs of a rapidly changing market. In regasification, we have supply rights or terminal capacity in the UK, the US and Singapore, valuable entry points for agreement for LNG exports from the LNG supply position by around 50% LNG into these markets, as well as long- US, with a purchase of 5.5 mtpa from above current levels over the next three term sales to customers in Chile, Japan the Sabine Pass LNG terminal being years, targeting 20 million tonnes per and China. developed by Cheniere Energy Partners, annum (mtpa) by 2015. In light of our L.P., and are progressing plans for export progress at QCLNG, together with the The Group has developed an industry from the Lake Charles facility, where we growth potential inherent within the leading portfolio of flexible long-term hold 100% of the import capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • FTSE Factsheet
    FTSE COMPANY REPORT Share price analysis relative to sector and index performance Argos Resources ARG Oil Gas and Coal — GBP 0.03 at close 16 April 2021 Absolute Relative to FTSE UK All-Share Sector Relative to FTSE UK All-Share Index PERFORMANCE 21-Apr-2015 1D WTD MTD YTD Absolute - - - - Rel.Sector - - - - Rel.Market - - - - VALUATION Data unavailable Trailing PE -ve EV/EBITDA -ve PB 0.2 PCF +ve Div Yield 0.0 Price/Sales - Net Debt/Equity -ve Div Payout 0.0 ROE -ve DESCRIPTION Data unavailable The principal activity of the Group is that of oil and gas exploration. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please see the final page for important legal disclosures. 1 of 4 FTSE COMPANY REPORT: Argos Resources 16 April 2021 Valuation Metrics Price to Earnings (PE) EV to EBITDA Price to Book (PB) 31-Mar-2021 31-Mar-2021 31-Mar-2021 100 ‖ ‖ 1 0.8 0.9 0.7 80 0.8 +1SD 0.7 0.6 60 0.6 0.5 +1SD 0.5 40 Avg 0.4 0.4 Avg 0.3 0.3 20 0.2 0.2 -1SD 0.1 -1SD 0 ‖ ‖ ‖ ‖ 0 ‖ ‖ ‖ ‖ 0.1 Apr-2016 Apr-2017 Apr-2018 Apr-2019 Apr-2020 Apr-2016 Apr-2017 Apr-2018 Apr-2019 Apr-2020 Apr-2016 Apr-2017 Apr-2018 Apr-2019 Apr-2020 Petrofac 5.8 Energean 73.2 Energean 2.0 Harbour Energy PLC -0.2 BP 45.5 Lamprell 1.3 EnQuest -0.6 Hunting 31.5 Diversified Gas & Oil 1.2 Tullow Oil -0.7 Diversified Gas & Oil 11.3 BP 1.1 Lamprell -1.4 Oil Gas and Coal 9.5 Oil Gas and Coal 1.1 Oil Gas and Coal -5.2 Tullow Oil 7.9 Cairn Energy 1.0 Cairn Energy -9.4 Harbour Energy PLC 2.8 Pharos Energy 0.3 Wood Group (John) -10.4 Pharos Energy 1.5 Argos Resources 0.2 Argos Resources -17.2
    [Show full text]