Chalk Rivers & Streams
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appendix 5 Defining Reference Conditions for Chalk Stream and Fenland Natural Channels
Appendix 5 Defining reference conditions for chalk stream and Fenland natural channels Chalk stream geomorphology is poorly understood, and under-researched. What studies exist appear to confirm that the majority of UK and European chalk streams have been modified in form and hydraulics by a long history of river management (Sear and others 1999, WRc 2000). The overriding control these modifications exert on the geomorphology and processes operating within the channel, make it difficult to establish what features and physical habitat diversity a natural, unmodified chalk stream should display. In the absence of semi-natural chalk stream habitats from which reference conditions can be determined, the Water Framework Directive specifies the use of palaeoecological information (Logan and Furze 2002). However much of this research is focussed on interpretations of human activity or climatic reconstruction rather than on the specific determination of river form and associated habitats (Davies and Griffiths 2005; French and Lewis 2002). Despite this, it is possible to reconstruct some information of relevance to characterising the floodplain habitats associated with relatively undisturbed chalk streams and rivers. French and others 2005 report a complex suite of landscape changes in the Dry valley and upper reaches of a chalk stream in Dorset. Their results suggest the presence of a relatively wide shallow low sinuosity meandering channel throughout the Holocene into the early historic period, between 30 - 50m in width and 1.5 – 3m in depth with a width:depth ratio of between 10 and 33. The authors stress that the development of each chalk valley is best considered individually rather than to expect a common history of landscape evolution hence the precise form of the channel system and floodplain habitats is also likely to be valley specific. -
Protecting Wildlife for the Future
CINDERELLA SCORES A HAT-TRICK! 3 years, 3 projects, 3km of winterbourne chalkstream restored Introduction The Dorset Wild Rivers project and the Monitoring & Results Environment Agency have created three successful winterbourne restoration projects In order to measure the impacts of that have delivered a number of outcomes our work, pre and post work including Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) macroinvertebrate and fish targets, working towards Good Ecological monitoring is being carried out as Status (GES under the Water Framework part of the project. Directive (WFD) and building resilience to climate change. A more diverse habitat supporting diverse wildlife has been created. Winterbournes are rare chalk streams which The bankside vegetation has been are groundwater fed and only flow at certain manipulated to provide a mixture of times of the year as groundwater levels in the both shaded and more open sections aquifer fluctuate. They support a range of of channel and a more species rich specialist wildlife adapted to this unusual margin. flow regime, including a number of rare or scarce invertebrates. Our macro invertebrate sampling indicates that the work has been a So called “Cinderella” chalkstreams because great success: the rare mayfly larva they are so often overlooked. Their Paraleptophlebia werneri (Red Data ecological value is often degraded as a result Book 3), and the notable blackfly of pressures from agricultural practices, land larva Metacnephia amphora, were drainage, urban and infrastructure found in the stream only 6 months development, abstraction and flood after the work was completed. defences. The Conservation value of the new Over centuries, the spring-fed South channel was reassessed using the Winterbourne in Dorset has been degraded. -
Orchard House, West Worthing, West Sussex, Bn11 4Pu Worthing Office 01903 216219 | [email protected]
ORCHARD HOUSE, WEST WORTHING, WEST SUSSEX, BN11 4PU WORTHING OFFICE 01903 216219 | [email protected] AN INCREDIBLE OPPORTUNITY TO PURCHASE A MOST DESIREABLE HOME THAT IN OUR OPINION TICKS ALL THE BOXES. Orchard House is a hidden gem To the rear of the property is a representing an incredible superb kitchen diner with clearly opportunity to purchase a most defined areas for seating and desirable home that has it all. The cooking with a large central island property sits at the end of a surrounded by a recently refitted private lane in approximately kitchen. Off of the kitchen is a quarter of an acre of gardens with useful boot room with side access a very private feel yet moments which in turn leads to a partially from local amenities. The house is converted integral garage and a Arts and Crafts style believed built utility room with a shower and W.C in the early 1930's sitting central plus space for a washing machine. to the picturesque plot. Internally To the first floor are four double the two floors of interiors are both bedrooms all with different aspects spacious and bright with well the second largest having a step balanced accommodation. down en suite shower room and The ground floor has an inviting the master a triple aspect with a entrance hall with original beautiful en suite and separate paneling and glazed doors giving dressing area. views over the garden. The Externally the gardens are of a reception room is dual aspect with superb size with a large graveled a welcoming Inglenook fireplace drive leading to a double car port housing a wood burner, the second with separate workshop. -
Flood Risk from Groundwater: Examples from a Chalk Catchment in 2 Southern England 3 4 A.G
1 Flood risk from groundwater: examples from a Chalk catchment in 2 southern England 3 4 A.G. Hughes1, T. Vounaki1, D.W. Peach1, A.M. Ireson2, C.R. Jackson1, A.P. Butler2, J.P. Bloomfield3, 5 J. Finch4 and H.S. Wheater2 6 1 British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottinghamshire, UK 7 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK 8 3 British Geological Survey, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK 9 4 Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK 10 11 12 13 14 Correspondence Abstract A.G. Hughes, British Geological Survey, 15 Groundwater flooding has moved up the policy-makers’ agenda as a result of the 16 Keyworth, Nottinghamshire, UK Email: [email protected] United Kingdom experiencing extensive groundwater flooding in winter 2000/ 17 2001. However, there is a lack of appropriate methods and data to support 18 DOI:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01095.x groundwater flood risk assessment. The implications for flood risk assessment of 19 groundwater flooding are outlined using a study of the Chalk aquifer underlying 20 Key words the Pang and Lambourn catchments in Berkshire, UK. Groundwater flooding in 21 Q2 ’; ’; ’. the Chalk results from the water table reaching the land surface and producing 22 long-duration surface flows (weeks to months), causing significant disruption to 23 transport infrastructure and households. By analyzing existing data with a farmers’ 24 survey, it was found that groundwater flooding consists of a combination of 25 intermittent stream discharge and anomalous springflow. This work shows that 26 there is a significant challenge involved in drawing together data and under- 27 standing of groundwater flooding, which includes vital local knowledge, reason- 28 able risk assessment procedures and deterministic modelling. -
WEST SUSSEX JOINT DEMENTIA STRATEGY 2020 to 2023 Developed in Partnership with West Sussex County Council and NHS Clinical Commissioning Group
www.westsussex.gov.uk WEST SUSSEX JOINT DEMENTIA STRATEGY 2020 TO 2023 Developed in partnership with West Sussex County Council and NHS Clinical Commissioning Group www.westsussex.gov.uk ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CONTENTS Foreword………………………………………. 3 Introduction……………………………... 4-6 • What is dementia? • Audience for the strategy • Purpose of the strategy • How we will get there • Understanding the challenge • Strategy development process • Our vision Where we are now…………………... 7-8 National & Local Pictures……….. 9-10 We are very grateful to the residents of National & Local Context…………... 11 The Economic Cost……………………. 12 West Sussex, our partners, staff and other The Dementia Well Pathway……… 13 stakeholders who were instrumental in the Preventing well section……..… 14-16 successful development of this strategy Diagnosing well section……….. 17-20 through their participation and feedback. Supporting well section……….. 23-29 Living well section……………..… 30-35 Particular thanks go to Alzheimer’s Dying well section……………….. 36-40 Society’s Chichester & Bognor Positive Thinkers, Horsham Rusty Brains and A joint strategic approach to dementia Worthing Town Cryer’s. Age UK West in West Sussex……………………… 41 Sussex’s K2 Club members, Sangam Monitoring delivery and impact Women’s Group and Carers Support West across the pathway…………….… 42 Appendices………………………..… 43-46 Sussex East Grinstead carers group. Photos here!!! 2 | West Sussex Joint Dementia Strategy 2020-23 FOREWARD With the ageing population of the county expected to rise exponentially in the next 10 years, a timely diagnosis for those with dementia is vital not only for them, but also for their family and friends. A timely diagnosis enables them to maximise control over their lives by planning ahead and accessing support to ensure that they can enjoy an active and independent life for as long as possible. -
The Natural Capital of Temporary Rivers: Characterising the Value of Dynamic Aquatic–Terrestrial Habitats
VNP12 The Natural Capital of Temporary Rivers: Characterising the value of dynamic aquatic–terrestrial habitats. Valuing Nature | Natural Capital Synthesis Report Lead author: Rachel Stubbington Contributing authors: Judy England, Mike Acreman, Paul J. Wood, Chris Westwood, Phil Boon, Chris Mainstone, Craig Macadam, Adam Bates, Andy House, Dídac Jorda-Capdevila http://valuing-nature.net/TemporaryRiverNC Suggested citation: Stubbington, R., England, J., Acreman, M., Wood, P.J., Westwood, C., Boon, P., The Natural Capital of Mainstone, C., Macadam, C., Bates, A., House, A, Didac, J. (2018) The Natural Capital of Temporary Temporary Rivers: Rivers: Characterising the value of dynamic aquatic- terrestrial habitats. Valuing Nature Natural Capital Characterising the value of dynamic Synthesis Report VNP12. The text is available under the Creative Commons aquatic–terrestrial habitats. Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) Valuing Nature | Natural Capital Synthesis Report Contents Introduction: Services provided by wet and the natural capital of temporary rivers.............. 4 dry-phase assets in temporary rivers................33 What are temporary rivers?...................................... 4 The evidence that temporary rivers deliver … services during dry phases...................34 Temporary rivers in the UK..................................... 4 Provisioning services...................................34 The natural capital approach Regulating services.......................................35 to ecosystem protection............................................ -
The Nelson Ranch Located Along the Shasta River Has Two Flow Gaging
Baseline Assessment of Salmonid Habitat and Aquatic Ecology of the Nelson Ranch, Shasta River, California Water Year 2007 Jeffrey Mount, Peter Moyle, and Michael Deas, Principal Investigators Report prepared by: Carson Jeffres (Project lead), Evan Buckland, Bruce Hammock, Joseph Kiernan, Aaron King, Nickilou Krigbaum, Andrew Nichols, Sarah Null Report prepared for: United States Bureau of Reclamation Klamath Area Office Center for Watershed Sciences University of California, Davis • One Shields Avenue • Davis, CA 95616-8527 Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................................2 2. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................6 3. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................6 4. SITE DESCRIPTION.........................................................................................................................................7 5. HYDROLOGY.....................................................................................................................................................8 5.1. STAGE-DISCHARGE RATING CURVES .......................................................................................................9 5.2. PRECIPITATION........................................................................................................................................11 -
CHAPTER 3: What Is Distinctive About East Sussex?
CHAPTER 3: What is Distinctive about Poor access to services in some rural areas Coastal towns and economies in need of regeneration East Sussex? Low wages, skills and aspirations and high part-time employment Few high earners in East Sussex, most working outside the county East Sussex has a population of An ageing population with an increasing demand for services just over half a million and Poor health, high rates of long term limiting illness in some areas covers an area of 1725 square Significant areas of poverty and of deprivation kilometres (666 square miles), 64% falling within two nationally A weak local economy, dominated by small businesses employing fewer designated Areas of Outstanding than 10 people, with lack of space in which to grow Natural Beauty. The county Flood risk in some rural and coastal areas comprises the Boroughs of Social issues, including crime and social change. Eastbourne and Hastings, and the Districts of Lewes, Rother A County of Extremes and Wealden. East Sussex is a county of extremes. Whilst the landscape is predominantly Local Distinctiveness rural in character, nearly three quarters of the population live in urban areas (58% live in the coastal urban areas and a further 18% live in market towns). Many people in East Sussex identify most strongly with their local Four of our five urban centres are located on the coast, of which Eastbourne neighbourhood, village, parish, town, district or borough. Each of these has a and Hastings are the largest and most densely populated. As noted in the distinct history, community and identity and with it, distinctive strengths, Government’s review of Sub-Regional Economic Development and problems and opportunities. -
SUSSEX COUNTY OFFICE of the SURROGATE Fee Schedule
SUSSEX COUNTY OFFICE OF THE SURROGATE Fee Schedule PROBATE OF WILLS AND COPIES • PROBATE: $100.00 • Probate of a will of not more than two pages. • Each additional page $5.00 • Probate of each codicil, not exceeding one page, $25.00. • Where codicil requires an additional witness, $5.00. • To reopen probate proceedings for qualification of executor or taking proof of extra witness, $25.00. • One witness in the above probate proceedings, no charge. • Each additional witness, $5.00. • Recording and comparing, microfilming or photostating, each additional page of will or codicil, $5.00. • Filing, entering, issuing and recording, microfilming or photostating, proceedings in commission for deposition of foreign witness to a will or codicil, $35.00. Plain extra copy of will, $3.00 for each page. • Certified copy of will with proofs for New Jersey county, not exceeding two pages including will and codicil, $50.00. For pages in excess of two, $5.00 for each page. • Wills filed but not probated (as, where there are no asset), $10.00 for first two pages, $5.00 for each additional page, $5.00 for cover letter stating no assets, $5.00 for death certificate. • Exemplifying will for another state, not exceeding two pages including will and codicil, plus cost of certificate of Secretary of State when requisite, $75.00 (not including $9.00 fee for exemplified forms). For pages in excess of two, $5.00 for each page. • Recording, microfilming or photostating, docketing, indexing, filing and reporting to the Division of Taxation in the Department of the Treasury an exemplified copy of will and probate proceedings from another state, $5.00 for each page. -
18 an Interdisciplinary and Hierarchical Approach to the Study and Management of River Ecosystems M
18 An Interdisciplinary and Hierarchical Approach to the Study and Management of River Ecosystems M. C. THOMS INTRODUCTION Rivers are complex ecosystems (Thoms & Sheldon, 2000a) influenced by prior states, multi-causal effects, and the states and dynamics of external systems (Walters & Korman, 1999). Rivers comprise at least three interacting subsystems (geomorphological, hydro- logical and ecological), whose structure and function have traditionally been studied by separate disciplines, each with their own paradigms and perspectives. With increasing pressures on the environment, there is a strong trend to manage rivers as ecosystems, and this requires a holistic, interdisciplinary approach. Many disciplines are often brought together to solve environmental problems in river systems, including hydrology, geomor- phology and ecology. Integration of different disciplines is fraught with challenges that can potentially reduce the effectiveness of interdisciplinary approaches to environmental problems. Pickett et al. (1994) identified three issues regarding interdisciplinary research: – gaps in understanding appear at the interface between disciplines; – disciplines focus on specific scales or levels or organization; and, – as sub-disciplines become rich in detail they develop their own view points, assumptions, definitions, lexicons and methods. Dominant paradigms of individual disciplines impede their integration and the development of a unified understanding of river ecosystems. Successful inter- disciplinary science and problem solving requires the joining of two or more areas of understanding into a single conceptual-empirical structure (Pickett et al., 1994). Frameworks are useful tools for achieving this. Established in areas of engineering, conceptual frameworks help define the bounds for the selection and solution of problems; indicate the role of empirical assumptions; carry the structural assumptions; show how facts, hypotheses, models and expectations are linked; and, indicate the scope to which a generalization or model applies (Pickett et al., 1994). -
River Restoration and Chalk Streams
River Restoration and Chalk Streams Monday 22nd – Tuesday 23rd January 2001 University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB Organised by the River Restoration Centre in partnership with University of Hertfordshire Environment Agency, Thames Region Report compiled by: Vyv Wood-Gee Countryside Management Consultant Scabgill, Braehead, Lanark ML11 8HA Tel: 01555 870530 Fax: 01555 870050 E-mail: [email protected] Mobile: 07711 307980 ____________________________________________________________________________ River Restoration and Chalk Streams Page 1 Seminar Proceedings CONTENTS Page no. Introduction 3 Discussion Session 1: Flow Restoration 4 Discussion Session 2: Habitat Restoration 7 Discussion Session 3: Scheme Selection 9 Discussion Session 4: Post Project Appraisal 15 Discussion Session 5: Project Practicalities 17 Discussion Session 6: BAPs, Research and Development 21 Discussion Session 7: Resource Management 23 Discussion Session 8: Chalk streams and wetlands 25 Discussion Session 9: Conclusions and information dissemination 27 Site visit notes 29 Appendix I: Delegate list 35 Appendix II: Feedback 36 Appendix III: RRC Project Information Pro-forma 38 Appendix IV: Project summaries and contact details – listed 41 alphabetically by project name. ____________________________________________________________________________ River Restoration and Chalk Streams Page 2 Seminar Proceedings INTRODUCTION Workshop Objectives · To facilitate and encourage interchange of information, views and experiences between people working with projects and programmes with strong links to chalk streams and activities or research that affect this environment. · To improve the knowledge base on the practicalities and associated benefits of chalk stream restoration work in order to make future investments more cost effective. Participants The workshop was specifically targeted at individuals and organisations whose activities, research or interests include a specific practical focus on chalk streams. -
The South Downs National Park
Using evidence to drive strategic approaches to protecting species and habitats A case study from the South Downs Clare Blencowe @SxBRC Record Centre Manager Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre • We are an impartial provider of environmental information services encompassing biodiversity, geodiversity and other aspects of Sussex’s natural capital • We work in partnership with data users and data providers, for public benefit • We are not for profit and hosted by Sussex Wildlife Trust • We are one of many local environmental record centres situated around the UK The South Downs National Park © Nigel Symington Beachy Head © Nigel Symington The Lewes Downs © Graeme Lyons Heyshott Escarpment © Mark Colvin Old Winchester Hill © Herry Lawford (CC BY 2.0) Chalk grassland © Arthur Hoare, Neil Hulme, Graeme Lyons Chalk grassland Lowland Chalk Grassland is one of our most valued and endangered habitats. It is both rich in biodiversity and wholly characteristic of South Downs landscape. It is also under pressure from farming and other land-use change with a risk of becoming increasingly fragmented. Chris Fairbrother – Landscape & Biodiversity Strategy Lead, South Downs National Park Authority Chalk grassland – what do we know about it? 1987 A botanical survey and assessment of the chalk grasslands of Hampshire, Pardon, B. J. 1992 A botanical survey of unimproved grassland of the South Downs in West Sussex, Steven, G. 1992 A botanical survey of unimproved grassland on the South Downs in East Sussex, Steven, G. and Muggeridge, N. 2005 Sussex calcareous grassland dataset created using contributions from the South Downs Conservation Board and Natural England 2010 South Downs National Park established 2012 South Downs Way Ahead Nature Improvement Area (NIA) funded for three years as a Defra pilot 2012 – South Downs NIA Local Wildlife Site Surveys, 2014 Forbes, N.