Researching Corporeality in Education: an Investigation of Knowledge Production in Gender and Education Research on Boys and Masculinities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Researching Corporeality in Education: an Investigation of Knowledge Production in Gender and Education Research on Boys and Masculinities RESEARCHING CORPOREALITY IN EDUCATION: AN INVESTIGATION OF KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION IN GENDER AND EDUCATION RESEARCH ON BOYS AND MASCULINITIES A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2019 OMAR A KAISSI SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENT, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT MANCHESTER INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION List of Contents List of abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ 7 List of tables ........................................................................................................................................ 8 List of figures ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. 10 Declaration of original contribution ................................................................................................. 11 Copyright statement ......................................................................................................................... 12 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 1: Toward creating a collective story of scholarship in the field of education ................... 16 1.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 16 1.2. Rationale ............................................................................................................................... 19 1.2.1. Gender identity, the body and extra-rational, corporeal knowing ............................... 20 1.2.2. Neoliberalism, higher education and knowledge production ...................................... 22 1.2.3. Recognising positionality: a tit-for-tat with the field .................................................... 25 1.3. Structure of the thesis .......................................................................................................... 27 Chapter 2: Scoping the landscape of sociological knowing in the field of education ...................... 32 2.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 32 2.2. Sociology: a troubled and troubling profession .................................................................... 32 2.3. From certainty to uncertainty and back again: sociological knowing in education ............. 37 2.3.1. Political Arithmetic: knowing as replication ................................................................. 38 2.3.2. New Sociology of Education: knowing as reflective ..................................................... 40 2.3.3. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: knowing as demonstration ............... 44 2.4. Corporeality and corporeal knowing: past, present and future ........................................... 47 2.4.1. The location of corporeality in the sociology of education .......................................... 48 2.4.2. The future of corporeal knowing: demise or continuity? ............................................. 52 2.5. Summary of chapter two ...................................................................................................... 54 Chapter 3: Methodology ................................................................................................................... 55 3.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 55 3.2. Critical realism: a methodology for investigating knowledge production ............................ 56 3.2.1. Ontological and epistemological assumptions ............................................................. 57 3.2.2. Operationalising critical realism ................................................................................... 61 3.3. Phase one: knowing and knowledge .................................................................................... 64 2 3.3.1. Rationale ....................................................................................................................... 64 3.3.2. Data generation ............................................................................................................ 65 3.3.3. Data analysis ................................................................................................................. 68 3.4. Phase two: knowing and knowers ........................................................................................ 70 3.4.1. Rationale ....................................................................................................................... 70 3.4.2. Population list and sample ............................................................................................ 73 3.4.3. Access ............................................................................................................................ 74 3.4.4. Designing and conducting the interviews ..................................................................... 76 3.4.5. Analysis and interpretation ........................................................................................... 78 3.5. From documents to interviews: writing a collective story of scholarship ............................ 81 3.6. Trustworthiness and research integrity ................................................................................ 83 3.7. Constructing the thesis ......................................................................................................... 85 3.7.1. A critical realist investigation of knowledge production in gender and education research on boys (chapter four) ................................................................................................... 85 3.7.2. Corporeal knowing and the participation-protection dilemma in gender and education research on boys (chapter five) .................................................................................................... 86 3.7.3. Knowledge, the body and the challenges of doing intellectual work in gender and education research (chapter six) .................................................................................................. 86 3.7.4. On corporeal knowing, educational research and state-led hysteresis in the neoliberal university (chapter seven) ............................................................................................................ 87 3.8. Summary of chapter three .................................................................................................... 87 Chapter 4: A critical realist investigation of knowledge production in gender and education research on boys ............................................................................................................................... 89 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. 89 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 89 Investigating ways of knowing in research on boys and masculinities............................................. 91 Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 92 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 93 The predominance of agency............................................................................................................ 96 Examining the shift from sociological to social theory in the field ................................................... 98 Sociological theory and the view of the social from above ........................................................... 99 Social theory and the views of the social from below and from within ...................................... 101 The corporeal, the sociological and the persistent tensions of gender theorising ..................... 102 Summary and concluding thoughts for future research ................................................................. 104 3 References ...................................................................................................................................... 106 Chapter 5: Corporeal knowing and the participation-protection dilemma in gender and education research on boys ............................................................................................................................. 114 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 114 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 115 Investigating potential limitations to knowing about boys and gender ......................................... 116 Methods ...................................................................................................................................... 118 Researching boys as
Recommended publications
  • Celebrating Diversity and Promoting Equality in Schools
    5TH ANNUAL NATIONAL SMSC CONFERENCE 23RD FEBRUAry 2017, LONDON #oeSMSC Celebrating Diversity and Promoting Equality in Schools Deliver effective SMSC, promote British values and embed steps to character education across your whole school deliver successful SMSC, promote British values and embed character education www.oego.co/SMSC Expert speakers include: Andrew Moffat Assistant Headteacher, Parkfield Community School Joshua Hunt Chaplain, Felixstowe Academy Hanif Qadir Counter-Terrorism Strategist, Active Change Foundation OPTIMUS UNLIMITED CPD MEMBERS CAN ATTEND THIS EVENT FOR FREE* KEY BENEFITS WHOLE-SCHOOL APPROACH currIculum OFSTED Ensure all staff Embed SMSC, character Clarify Ofsted’s actively promote diversity education and British values expectations and equality across the school for SMSC in 2017 Supported by: Celebrating Diversity and Promoting Equality in Schools E: [email protected] • T: 0207 265 4107 • F: 0845 450 6410 Supporting the Progress of the More able Celebrating Diversity and This year’s speakers include... Promoting Equality in Schools Andrew Moffat Values and character education are nothing new. But with a rise in Assistant Headteacher, Parkfield Community School Andrew is Assistant Headteacher at a large inner city hate crime, an uncertain political climate and growing reports of primary in Birmingham. He is the author of “No Outsiders rudderless children and young people without a sense belonging, in our school: Teaching the Equality Act in Primary Schools” and is noted for work with faith communities on pressure falls to your school to ensure you celebrate diversity and LGBT equality. promote respect amongst all students. Effective SMSC, character education and the promotion Jane Leary Head of Personal Development, Prestwich Arts College of values, alongside a determined whole-school culture which Jane’s experience of working with young people spans promotes respect, are powerful tools to help you achieve this.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenging Homophobia in Primary Schools
    CHALLENGING HOMOPHOBIA IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS AN EARLY YEARS RESOURCE Written by Andrew Moffat Published by Birmingham's Bullying Reduction Action Group (BRAG) Birmingham is for Everyone • networking; Birmingham City Council is proud of • facilitating others to take action to prevent Birmingham's great diversity and wants our and tackle bullying; and city to be a place where everyone is welcome • disseminating good practice. and can play a positive and active part. Stonewall Education Champion We believe that all children, young people BRAG has been a Stonewall Education and adults have the right to learn and work in Champion since the scheme began in 2007 an environment that is free from harassment and works with Stonwall and other Local and bullying so that they feel safe. Authority and School Champions to establish ways in which we can address homophobic We believe that bullying for any reason is bullying and promote a safe and inclusive unacceptable and are working hard to tackle learning environment for all young people. all types of bullying, including bullying on account of people's race, creed, colour, sexual orientation or disability. We are also finding ways to address new and emerging forms of bullying, such as cyber- bullying. Website Bullying Reduction Action Group (BRAG) Working closely with Birmingham Across Birmingham many people are working Safeguarding Children Board, BRAG has hard to reduce bullying of children and young developed some web pages to point you in people in the city. The Bullying Reduction the direction of all the information, support, Action Group (BRAG) is a group of advice and services you need to help you professionals from different agencies working prevent and tackle bullying of children and with children and young people across young people, wherever you are in Birmingham.
    [Show full text]
  • SSAT Journal 12 Summer 2018 Contents
    SSAT Journal 12 Summer 2018 Contents 1 Welcome 24 Changing lives through learning Sue Williamson, SSAT Abby Deeks, West Lakes Academy 2 Restructuring lessons for rapid pace 27 Under staffed: reflections on how best and metacognitive practice to integrate non-specialists into a Claire Bishop, department Sir Christopher Hatton Academy Russell Coombes, Haydon School 5 Why we haven’t all got a growth 31 Addressing teacher recruitment at mindset… yet academy level Chris Hildrew, Thomas Bayston, Churchill Academy & Sixth Form The Priory Academy LSST 8 How we embedded formative 36 LGBT inclusivity in schools: teaching assessment children there are ‘no outsiders’ Annabelle Taylor, Andrew Moffat, Ricards Lodge High School Parkfield Community School 11 Teaching and learning: it’s about 38 Preparing for life after school – knowing the young people especially relevant to young people Daniella McManamon, with special needs Elthorne Park High School Peter Chambers, SSAT 15 Desirable difficulties: creating the 42 Why is visible leadership so important conditions to stretch and challenge the in schools? most able learners Laura Clash, Cambourne Village College Lucy Greenwood and Jodie Goulding, 45 Consider your ‘why’ to build and Skipton Girls’ High School develop the school’s culture 18 Progress based on collaborative Dr Patricia Thompson, learning, innovative engagement – Sir Jonathan North Community College and challenge 48 Where students are empowered to Senior Team, Pendle Vale College improve teaching and learning 21 Engaging teacher stakeholders in their Chris Stephens, The Romsey School own professional learning Neil Feist, Sackville School Contents page Welcome Sue Williamson, Chief Executive, SSAT Welcome to the last journal of the 2017/18 Also in this edition, you can read about the learning academic year.
    [Show full text]
  • Backlash, Conspiracies & Confrontation
    STATE OF HATE 2021 BACKLASH, CONSPIRACIES & CONFRONTATION HOPE ACTION FUND We take on and defeat nazis. Will you step up with a donation to ensure we can keep fighting the far right? Setting up a Direct Debit to support our work is a quick, easy, and secure pro- cess – and it will mean you’re directly impacting our success. You just need your bank account number and sort code to get started. donate.hopenothate.org.uk/hope-action-fund STATE OF HATE 2021 Editor: Nick Lowles Deputy Editor: Nick Ryan Contributors: Rosie Carter Afrida Chowdhury Matthew Collins Gregory Davis Patrik Hermansson Roxana Khan-Williams David Lawrence Jemma Levene Nick Lowles Matthew McGregor Joe Mulhall Nick Ryan Liron Velleman HOPE not hate Ltd PO Box 61382 London N19 9EQ Registered office: Suite 1, 3rd Floor, 11-12 St. James’s Square, London SW1Y 4LB United Kingdom Tel.: +44 (207) 9521181 www.hopenothate.org.uk @hope.n.hate @hopenothate HOPE not hate @hopenothate HOPE not hate | 3 STATE OF HATE 2021 CONTENTS SECTION 1 – OVERVIEW P6 SECTION 3 – COVID AND CONSPIRACIES P36 38 COVID-19, Conspiracy Theories And The Far Right 44 Conspiracy Theory Scene 48 Life After Q? 6 Editorial 52 UNMASKED: The QAnon ‘Messiah’ 7 Executive Summary 54 The Qanon Scene 8 Overview: Backlash, Conspiracies & Confrontation 56 From Climate Denial To Blood and Soil SECTION 2 – RACISM P14 16 Hate Crimes Summary: 2020 20 The Hostile Environment That Never Went Away 22 How BLM Changed The Conversation On Race 28 Whitelash: Reaction To BLM And Statue Protests 31 Livestream Against The Mainstream
    [Show full text]
  • FAR RIGHT TERROR GOES GLOBAL MAGAZINE RELAUNCHED L More Pages L More Exclusives ESSENTIAL READING from the UK’S LEADING ANTI-FASCIST CAMPAIGN
    STATE OF HATE 2020 FAR RIGHT TERROR GOES GLOBAL MAGAZINE RELAUNCHED l more pages l more exclusives ESSENTIAL READING FROM THE UK’S LEADING ANTI-FASCIST CAMPAIGN Providing a positive antidote Providing a positive antidote to hate and intolerance to hate and intolerance hopenothate.org.uk hopenothate.org.uk EXTREME WEATHER EXTREME DENIAL 2020: in search ofhope EXTREME POLITICS Price £7.00 Issue 41 – Winter 2019-20 Price £7.00 Issue 40 – Autumn 2019 SUBSCRIBE NOW hopenothate.org.uk/magazine £25 / year (quarterly) DON’T MISS YOUR COPY STATE OF HATE 2020 Editor: Nick Lowles Deputy editor: Nick Ryan Sub-editor: Jemma Levene Contributors: Rosie Carter Matthew Collins Gregory Davis Patrik Hermansson David Lawrence Joe Mulhall Simon Murdoch Liron Velleman HOPE not hate Ltd PO Box 61382 SUBSCRIBE NOW London N19 9EQ Registered office: Suite 1, 3rd Floor, 11-12 St. James’s Square, London SW1Y 4LB hopenothate.org.uk/magazine United Kingdom Tel.: +44 (207) 9521181 £25 / year (quarterly) www.hopenothate.org.uk @hope.n.hate @hopenothate HOPE not hate @hopenothate DON’T MISS YOUR COPY HOPE not hate | 3 STATE OF HATE 2020 CONTENTS SECTION 1 – OVERVIEW P6 SECTION 3 – TERRORISM P24 Livestreamed Terror 26 Terrorgram Network 30 2019 Far-Right Terrorists 34 A Case To Ban The O9A 35 Editorial: An Evolving Threat 6 Investigation: Order of Nine Angles 36 Executive Summary 8 Inside Iron March 42 Combat 18: Old School Threat 48 SECTION 2 – ESSAYS P10 C18 International 50 Worldwide Overview of Hate 12 C18’s Catalogue of Terror 54 European Map 16 Inspiring Nazi Terror
    [Show full text]
  • Equality, Diversity and Cohesion Framework for Schools in Birmingham
    Spring 2018 WE’RE ALL DIFFERENT BUT EQUAL AN EQUALITY, DIVERSITY AND COHESION FRAMEWORK FOR SCHOOLS IN BIRMINGHAM A great city to grow up in 3 AN EQUALITY, DIVERSITY, AND COHESION FRAMEWORK Contents 4 INTRODUCTION 17 DEFINITIONS VISIONS AND VALUES 4 DISCRIMINATION 17 COMMITMENTS AND PRINCIPLES 4 INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION 17 HARASSMENT 17 7 THE FRAMEWORK POSITIVE ACTION 18 ORGANISATIONAL COMMITMENT PROTECTED CHARACTERISTICS 18 AND COMPLIANCE 7 VICTIMISATION 18 KNOWING YOUR PUPILS RESPONSIBILITIES FOR DELIVERING AND COMMUNITY 7 THIS FRAMEWORK 18 CONSULTING WIDELY 8 THE GOVERNING BODY 19 SAFEGUARDING AND EQUALITY 8 THE HEAD TEACHER 20 A SKILLED AND COMMITTED ALL STAFF 20 WORKFORCE 8 TEACHING STAFF 20 BIRMINGHAM CURRICULUM VISITORS 21 STATEMENT 9 GOOD PRACTICE IN SUPPORTING SCHOOLS 22 11 LEGAL DUTIES AND UNICEF RIGHTS RESPECTING OTHER REQUIREMENTS SCHOOLS 22 PROTECTED CHARACTERISTICS 11 NO OUTSIDERS IN OUR SCHOOL; 23 PUBLIC SECTOR EQUALITY DUTY 14 FAITH MAKES A DIFFERENCE 24 UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD 1990 23 APPENDIX A: EQUALITY HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 14 AND COHESION TooLKIT EDUCATION AND INSPECTIONS ACT 2006 s 38(1) 15 32 EQUALITY, DIVERSITY EDUCATION ACT 1996 s 406-7 15 AND COMMUNITY EDUCATION ACT 2002 s78 15 COHESION AUDIT COUNTER TERRORISM AND SECURITY ACT 2015 s 64 15 45 APPENDIX B: GUIDES, TOOLS, EDUCATION ACT 2002 s176 16 AND GOOD PRACTICE BIRMINGHAM CURRICULUM STATEMENT 16 4 AN EQUALITY, DIVERSITY, AND COHESION FRAMEWORK INTRODUCTION This local guidance should be read alongside the non-statutory advice produced by the Department for Education; The Equality Act for Schools 2014. It has been produced to help schools to understand how the Equality Act affects them and how to fulfil their duties under the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • School Leaders' Parliamentary Briefing on Relationships
    School leaders’ Parliamentary briefing on Relationships Education, Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) and Health Education Tuesday 11 June 2019 #equalitiesineducation NAHT is the largest trade union and professional association for school leaders in the UK: www.naht.org.uk Introduction Paul Whiteman General secretary NAHT Over the past few months, a small number of schools have found themselves at the centre of high-profile protests against the teaching of equality and diversity. LGBT+ inclusion has been the focus of these protests. Protesters have argued that this learning should not happen in primary schools and parents should be able to withdraw their children from it. The secretary of state, the Head of Birmingham City Council, the head of the police in Birmingham, and now the schools minister, have all backed NAHT’s calls for these protests to stop. The truth is, without meaning to, the government has put school leaders in an extremely difficult position. They and their staff have had to endure threats against their careers and their personal safety. The government is encouraging schools to adopt the new regulations on Relationships Education from September 2019, but I have concerns that some will think twice about doing this unless the government issues immediate, clear and public assurances in three key areas. To start, the government must make it clear that Relationships Education in primary schools must be inclusive of all protected characteristics and treat the different types of relationships in our society equally, reflecting their equal status under the law and so promoting tolerance and respect for diversity. Following on from this, we need a clear message that Relationships Education in all schools will include LGBT content as set out in the statutory guidance that has already been published.
    [Show full text]
  • Order of the Companions of Honour Members of the Order of the Companions of Honour
    Order of the Companions of Honour Members of the Order of the Companions of Honour Sir Terence Orby CONRAN For services to Design. (Berkshire) Sir Mark Philip ELDER, CBE Musical Director, The Hallé Orchestra. For services to Music. (London) Dame Beryl GREY, DBE For services to Dance. (West Sussex) Sir James Paul MCCARTNEY, MBE Musician. For services to Music. (London) Ms Joanne Kathleen ROWLING, OBE Author. For services to Literature and Philanthropy. (Edinburgh) Dame Vera Stephanie SHIRLEY, DBE FREng Entrepreneur and Philanthropist. For services to the IT Industry and Philanthropy. (Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire) Delia Ann, Mrs SMITH, CBE Cook and Writer. For services to Cookery. (Stowmarket, Suffolk) Nicholas Herbert, Lord STERN OF BRENTFORD, FRS FBA For services to Economics, International Relations and Tackling Climate Change. (Midhurst, West Sussex) Sir John Edward SULSTON, FRS For services to Science and Society. (Stapleford, Cambridgeshire) 1 Knights Bachelor Knighthoods George William John BENJAMIN, CBE Composer, Conductor and Performer. For services to Music. (London) Leonard BLAVATNIK For services to Philanthropy. (London) Mark John BOLEAT Lately Chairman, Policy and Resources Committee, City of London Corporation. For services to the Financial Services Industry and to Local Government in London. (Moor Park (Northwood), Hertfordshire) William (Billy) CONNOLLY, CBE For services to Entertainment and charity. (East Sussex) Professor Hugh Charles Jonathan GODFRAY, CBE Hope Professor of Zoology, University of Oxford. For services to Scientific Research and for Scientific Advice to Government. (Mapledurham, Oxfordshire) Professor Simon LOVESTONE Professor of Translational Neuroscience, University of Oxford. For services to Neuroscience Research. (London) Dr John Menzies LOW, CBE Chief Executive, Charities Aid Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Homosexuality, Religion and the Contested Legal Framework Governing Sex Education in England
    This is a repository copy of Homosexuality, religion and the contested legal framework governing sex education in England. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/83357/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Vanderbeck, RM and Johnson, P (2015) Homosexuality, religion and the contested legal framework governing sex education in England. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 37 (2). pp. 161-179. ISSN 0964-9069 https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2015.1028152 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Homosexuality, religion and the contested legal framework governing sex education in England Robert M. Vanderbeck Senior Lecturer in Human Geography School of Geography University
    [Show full text]