DOCSLIB.ORG

SBE 2020: White Papers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SBE 2020: White Papers National Science Foundation Directorate of Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences SBE 2020: White Papers Titles, Authors, and Abstracts February 2011 SBE 2020: White Papers http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/sbe_2020 Recommended citation: National Science Foundation, Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences. 2011. SBE 2020: White Papers; Titles, Authors, and Abstracts. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. The abstracts contained in this publication and the works they describe are licensed under Creative Commons licenses (http://creativecommons.org/). The specifications of each license differ; for future use, please consult each work for the details of the license governing it. For more information on the SBE 2020 project, contact: Myron P. Gutmann Assistant Director Amy Friedlander Sr. Advisor Office of the Assistant Director National Science Foundation Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, Virginia 22230, USA Page 2 SBE 2020: White Papers http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/sbe_2020 Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 The White Paper Abstracts ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 Challenges for Social Sciences: Institutions and Economic Development ....................................................................................... 12 Advancing Ethical Research Across Disciplines .......................................................................................................................................... 12 Future Considerations for Archaeology at Altitude ................................................................................................................................... 12 Pushing the Boundaries of Economics............................................................................................................................................................. 13 Multiple Skills, Multiple Types of Education, and the Labor Market: A Research Agenda ....................................................... 13 Endangered Languages and Linguistic Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................. 13 Where They Live: Community Media Centers as Hubs for Building Technological Literacy, Media Literacy, and Active Citizenship ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 How and Why Do Close Relationships Shape Human Behavior? ......................................................................................................... 14 Grand Challenges in the Study of Employment and Technological Change .................................................................................... 15 National Communication Association's Response to Dear Colleague Letter .................................................................................. 15 Documenting Extant Cultural Collections: A Grand Challenge for the Social Sciences .............................................................. 15 Comments on Grand Challenges ......................................................................................................................................................................... 16 SBE 2020: Twenty-first-Century Challenges and Opportunities for the Human Sciences ....................................................... 16 Correcting the Mathematical Foundations of the Social and Economic Sciences ......................................................................... 16 A Grand Challenge for Linguistics: Scaling Up and Integrating Models ............................................................................................ 17 A Proposal for Future SBE/NSF Funding: Refocusing Microeconomic Policy Research ........................................................... 17 Researching Social Media in the 21st Century ............................................................................................................................................. 17 Migration, Multilingualism, and Minorities: New Challenges for the Linguistic Sciences ........................................................ 17 Melding Milk and Iron: The Affective Power of Pre-Colonial Science in Post-Colonial Africa ................................................ 18 Social Technical Congruence: The Link Between Social Science and Technology ....................................................................... 18 White Paper for NSF Grand Challenges ........................................................................................................................................................... 19 Robustness and Fragility of Markets: Research at the Interface of Economics and Computer Science ............................. 19 Semantic Typology as an Approach to Mapping the Nature-Nurture Divide in Cognition ...................................................... 19 SBE 2020: Quantitative Convergence of Lifespan Development, Neuroimaging, and Genetic Epidemiology ................. 19 Complex, Heterogeneous Teams Solving 21st-Century Problems ....................................................................................................... 20 The Grand Challenge of Understanding Group Effectiveness................................................................................................................ 20 The Science of Team Science (SciTS): A Beacon for 21st-Century Scientific Collaboration...................................................... 20 Future NSF Economics Funding Priorities ..................................................................................................................................................... 21 Teaching and Evaluation of Interdisciplinarity ........................................................................................................................................... 21 Expanding Multivariate Models .......................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Integrated Social Science: Exploring the Dark Matter of Human Cultures and Societies ......................................................... 22 Coupling Human System Data with Natural System Data: Laying a Foundation for Sustainability Science .................... 22 Improving Measures of Democracy and Governance ............................................................................................................................... 23 Page 3 SBE 2020: White Papers http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/sbe_2020 Social and Political Dynamics under Intensifying Climate Change: Proposal for a Long-Term Data Collection Project ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Beyond Despair: Next Decade Research Strategies to Promote Health Equity among Racial and Ethnic Minorities .. 23 What Can Animal Cognition Contribute to Cognitive Science? ............................................................................................................. 24 Prescriptive Decision Research: an Interdisciplinary Extension of Normative And Descriptive Decision Theiry Integrated With Decision Aiding Experience. ............................................................................................................................................... 24 Knowledge Development for Mental Health of Older Adults ................................................................................................................ 25 Understanding Standards ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Identifying the Biological Mechanisms Underlying Social Behavior .................................................................................................. 25 Documentation and Analysis of Endangered Languages, Cultures, and Knowledge Systems ................................................ 26 Expanding Access to Administrative Data for Research in the United States ................................................................................ 26 Dirty Jobs: Fitting a Statistical Model to a Large Data Set with a Large Amount of Missing Data ......................................... 26 The Management and Organization Science Puzzle: Questions from a Metaphorical Comparison of Medicine and Management ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae Professor Shane Mitchell Greenstein the Martin Marshall Professor of Business Administration Harvard Business School Jan, 2021
    Curriculum Vitae Professor Shane Mitchell Greenstein The Martin Marshall Professor of Business Administration Harvard Business School Jan, 2021 Department address: Technology Operation and Management Morgan Hall 439 Harvard Business School Harvard University Boston, MA 02163 Contact Information: E-mail:[email protected] Phone: 617-384-7472 Fax: 617-384-4072 Publications Books and edited volumes 1. 2016, (and Josh Lerner and Scott Stern, editors) Innovation, Policy and the Economy, Volume 17, Special issue devoted to the economics of digitization. NBER conference volume, University of Chicago Press. 2. 2015, How the Internet Became Commercial: Innovation, Privatization, and the Birth of a new Network, Princeton University Press. http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10574.html. Winner of the 2016 Schumpeter Prize. 3. 2015, (and Avi Goldfarb and Catherine Tucker, Editors), Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy, NBER conference book, University of Chicago Press. 4. 2013, (and Avi Goldfarb and Catherine Tucker, Editors), The Economics of Digitization, Edward Elgar; Cheltenham, UK. 5. 2007 (and Victor Stango, Editors), Standards and Public Policy, Cambridge Press. Second edition (paperback), 2011. 6. 2006 (Editor), Computing. Edward-Elgar Press, UK. 7. 2004, Diamonds are Forever, Computers are Not, Economic and Strategic Management in Computing Markets, Imperial College Press: London. 1 8. 2002, (and Lorrie Cranor, Editors), Communications Policy and Information Technology: Promises, Problems, Prospects, MIT Press. 9. 2001, (and Ben Compaine, Editors), Communications Policy in Transition: The Internet and Beyond, MIT Press. Articles in Refereed Journals 1. 2021. (Ran Zhuo, Bradley Huffaker, kc Claffy), The Impact of the General Data Protection Regulation on Internet Interconnection. Telecommunication Policy, (Also NBER Working paper 2648.) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Experts Or Crowd-Based Models Produce More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopædia Britannica and Wikipedia
    Do Experts or Crowd-Based Models Produce More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopædia Britannica and Wikipedia The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Greenstein, Shane, and Feng Zhu. "Do Experts or Crowd-Based Models Produce More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopædia Britannica and Wikipedia." MIS Quarterly 42, no. 3 (September 2018): 945–959. Published Version https://misq.org/do-experts-or-crowd-based-models-produce- more-bias-evidence-from-encyclopedia-britannica-and- wikipedia.html?SID=mmkpfmtqmf3a82vaiqqhilan31 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41946110 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP Do Experts or Crowd-based Models Produce More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopædia Britannica and Wikipedia* Shane Greenstein Feng Zhu [email protected] [email protected] Organizations today can use both crowds and experts to produce knowledge. While prior work compares the accuracy of crowd-produced and expert-produced knowledge, we compare bias in these two models in the context of contested knowledge, which involves subjective, unverifiable, or controversial information. Using data from Encyclopædia Britannica, authored by experts, and Wikipedia, an encyclopedia produced by an online community, we compare the slant and bias of pairs of articles on identical topics of US politics. Our slant measure is less (more) than zero when an article leans towards Democratic (Republican) viewpoints, while bias is the absolute value of the slant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Compatibility Standards: an Introduction to Recent Research1 . .;
    Econ. Innov. New Techn., !990, Vol. I, pp. 3-41 © 1990 Harwood Academic Publishers GmbH Reprints available directly from the publisher Printed in Great Britain Photocopying permitted by license only THE ECONOMICS OF COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS: AN INTRODUCTION TO RECENT RESEARCH1 PAUL A. DAVID Stanford University and SHANE GREENSTEIN University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana This paper surveys the contributions that economists have made to understanding standards-setting processes and their consequences for ijldustry structure and economic welfare. Standardization processes of four kinds are examined, namely: (1) market competition involving products embodying unsponsored standards, (2) market competition amo'llg sponsored (proprietary) standards, (3) agreements within volun­ tary standards-writing organizations, a11d (4) direct governmental promulgation. The major trajectories along which research has been moving are described and related to both the positive and the normative issues concerning compatibility standards that remain to be studied. ~- . .; 1. INTRODUCTION Recent and ongoing advances in microelectronics and communications technologies have made the formerly esoteric subject of technical compatibility standards a fami­ liar matter in our everyday experience, as well as a perennial topic for discussion in the industry press (see, e.g., Arnold (1985), Bartik (1985), Cropper (1980), Kass (1981), SJMN (1986), Teresko (1986), Witten (1983)), Today, many people- includ­ ing academic economists - would readily acknowledge that considerable importance attaches to the existence and nature of technical standards for the encoding, storage, processing and transmission of information. Questions concerning compatibility and voluntary standards-setting have emerged as having central strategic significance in the development and marketing of computer operating systems and software (e.g. DOS and UNIX), value added data networks (e.g., TELENET and TYMNET), local 2 ...
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Technology at Penn
    FIRST CLASS MAIL U.S. POSTAGE P A I D 3501 Sansom Street PERMIT NO. 2563 Philadelphia, PA 19104-6204 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-6204 Law and Technology at Penn | 2016-2017 | CTIC | 2016-2017 | Penn at Technology and Law at Penn Technology Law and 2016 –2017 Center for Technology, Innovation and Competition University of Pennsylvania Law School 3501 Sansom Street Philadelphia, PA 19104-6204 www.law.upenn.edu/institutes/ctic/ Law and Technology at Penn 2016 – 2017 The mission of the University of Pennsylvania Law School’s Center for Technology, Innovation and Competition (CTIC) is to create the nation’s foremost program in law and technology through pathbreaking scholarship and innovative educational programs. Our faculty is generating foundational research that is helping to shape and reshape the way policymakers think about technology-related issues. To accomplish this mission, CTIC delivers programming that explores the full range of scholarly perspectives, engages with technology policy and practice, and produces student programming designed to create the next generation of technology law scholars, policymakers, and practitioners. This scholarship often taps into the vast interdisciplinary expertise both within the Law School and in other parts of Penn, including the Wharton School, the Annenberg School for Communication, and the School of Engineering and Applied Science. CTIC is also pioneering new joint degree programs designed to create a new type of professional with advanced training in both law and engineering. For more information
    [Show full text]