A Basic Understanding of the Mechanics of Rolling Mill Rolls

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Basic Understanding of the Mechanics of Rolling Mill Rolls A BASIC UNDERSTANDING OF THE MECHANICS OF ROLLING MILL ROLLS Dr. Karl Heinrich Schröder K. H. Schröder: A BASIC UNDERSTANDING OF THE MECHANICS OF ROLLING MILL ROLLS File: SCHROEDER_ROLLS_010703.DOC PREFACE TO THE 1st REVISION I published this e-book in March 2003, for free downloads from ESW homepage http://www.esw.co.at. Immediately some friends and also myself found some spelling - of course - and even worse, real errors, sorry. Some colleagues claimed, “my material toughness” was not precise enough, and they made proposals for improvement. So I tried to eliminate (reduce) errors and to do definitions better. In April 20003, I joined the conference ROLLS 2003 in Birmingham, GB, and some presentations stimulated me to re-think and re-write chapter 4.6. “Roll Damage Caused by Fatigue”. The description of the impact of "particle cleanliness" on sup-surface starting, particularly "crumply" (high cycle) fatigue spalling was so far missing in this chapter totally. After the first release of this book, I was hoping for more stimulations and proposals for improvements, corrections, supplementations and additions by friends, customers, competitors or … Indeed, I am grateful for any comment - this helps to make it better - but in fact, there have been only very few messages. This leaves me waiting for more feedback. I expect to edit some more re-written chapters later. Especially I am waiting for results from "roll cooling simulation" to give my theory of fire-cracks more background. Secondary scale on hot strip and the impact on wear is another issue. Stresses from Hertzian pressure in 4-high cold mill back up rolls were measured years ago, the results were never published, but of high interest - also, maybe later. K. H. Schröder July 2003 K. H. Schröder: A BASIC UNDERSTANDING OF THE MECHANICS OF ROLLING MILL ROLLS File: SCHROEDER_ROLLS_010703.DOC CONTENTS 1. PREFACE / INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 2. WHERE DO WE COME FROM AND WHERE WE ARE GOING? .................................................... 4 2.1. GENERAL OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................. 4 2.2. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ROLLING MILLS.................................................................... 5 2.3. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF MATERIALS USED IN ROLLING MILLS............................... 8 3. BASIC BUT IMPORTANT KNOWLEDGE FROM MATERIAL SCIENCE ........................................ 11 3.1. HARDNESS .................................................................................................................................. 11 3.1.1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.2. PRINCIPLES OF HARDNESS READINGS .......................................................................... 12 3.1.3. HARDNESS CONVERSION.................................................................................................. 14 3.1.4. FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS OF HARDNESS READINGS................................................ 14 3.2. MATERIAL PROPERTIES FROM STATIC TESTING.................................................................. 16 3.2.1. ELASTIC DEFORMATIONS.................................................................................................. 16 3.2.2. TENSILE TEST...................................................................................................................... 19 3.2.2.1. TENSILE TEST WITH STRAIGHT TEST BAR............................................................. 19 3.2.2.2. TENSILE TEST WITH NOTCHED TEST BAR ............................................................. 22 3.2.3. TENSILE TESTS USING GREY IRON WITH LAMELLAR GRAPHITE SPECIMENS ......... 24 3.2.4. TENSILE STRENGTH ........................................................................................................... 28 3.2.5. WORK-HARDENING............................................................................................................. 30 3.2.6. COMPRESSION STRENGTH............................................................................................... 34 3.2.7. TORSIONAL STRENGTH ..................................................................................................... 36 3.3. FATIGUE....................................................................................................................................... 37 3.3.1. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND .............................................................................................. 37 3.3.2. FATIGUE STRENGTH .......................................................................................................... 39 3.3.3. THE IMPACT OF PRE-STRESS/RESIDUAL STRESS ON FATIGUE STRENGTH ............ 41 3.4. FRACTURE MECHANICS............................................................................................................ 43 3.5. WEAR ........................................................................................................................................... 47 3.6. FRICTION ..................................................................................................................................... 51 3.7. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES ............................................................................................................ 53 3.8. REMARKS ON MATERIALS USED FOR ROLLS........................................................................ 54 4. ROLLS .............................................................................................................................................. 57 4.1. DEMAND FOR ROLLING-MILL ROLLS....................................................................................... 57 4.2. REMARKS ON ROLL MAKING .................................................................................................... 59 4.3. HARDNESS OF ROLLS ............................................................................................................... 63 4.4. RESIDUAL STRESS..................................................................................................................... 66 4.5. ROLL DAMAGE CAUSED BY ONE SINGLE LOAD .................................................................... 71 4.5.1. THERMAL BREAKAGE......................................................................................................... 71 4.5.2. TORSIONAL BREAKAGE OF DRIVEN ROLL NECKS......................................................... 73 4.5.3. "FIRE-CRACKS".................................................................................................................... 74 4.5.4. LOCAL OVERLOAD .............................................................................................................. 76 4.6. ROLL DAMAGE CAUSED BY FATIGUE ..................................................................................... 77 4.6.1. FATIGUE BREAKAGE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF DESIGNED NOTCHES .................. 78 4.6.1.1. FATIGUE BREAKAGE OF SECTION MILL ROLLS..................................................... 78 4.6.1.2. FILLETS OF ROLLS ..................................................................................................... 79 4.6.2. FATIGUE ON ROLLS WITHOUT INFLUENCE OF DESIGNED NOTCHES........................ 81 4.6.2.1. SADDLE SPALLS IN WORK ROLLS ........................................................................... 81 4.6.2.2. EDGE SPALLING ......................................................................................................... 81 4.6.2.3. SPALLS, SPALLING IN GENERAL .............................................................................. 83 K. H. Schröder: A BASIC UNDERSTANDING OF THE MECHANICS OF ROLLING MILL ROLLS File: SCHROEDER_ROLLS_010703.DOC 4.7. DAMAGE OF STEEL ROLLS DUE TO HYDROGEN................................................................... 85 4.8. WEAR AND FRICTION OF ROLLS.............................................................................................. 87 4.8.1. WEAR AND ROLL PERFORMANCE.................................................................................... 87 4.8.2. WEAR ON ROLL NECKS...................................................................................................... 90 4.8.3. BITE ANGLE AND COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION................................................................ 92 4.9. ROLL REPAIR .............................................................................................................................. 94 4.9.1. ROLL INSPECTION AND REDRESSING OF BARREL SURFACE ..................................... 94 4.9.2. SPALLS ................................................................................................................................. 96 4.9.2.1. SPALLS IN WORK ROLLS........................................................................................... 96 4.9.2.2. SPALLS IN BACK-UP ROLLS ...................................................................................... 96 4.9.3. WEAR ON NECKS ................................................................................................................ 97 4.9.3.1. WEAR ON NECKS AT THE BEARING AREA ............................................................. 97 4.9.3.2. WEAR ON THE DRIVING ELEMENT........................................................................... 97 4.9.4. CRACKS IN NECKS.............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Rolling Process Bulk Deformation Forming
    Rolling Process Bulk deformation forming (rolling) Rolling is the process of reducing the thickness (or changing the cross-section) of a long workpiece by compressive forces applied through a set of rolls. This is the most widely used metal working process because it lends itself high production and close control of the final product. Bulk deformation forming (rolling) Bulk deformation forming (rolling) Rolling typically starts with a rectangular ingots and results in rectangular Plates (t > 6 mm), sheet (t < 3 mm), rods, bars, I- beams, rails etc Figure: Rotating rolls reduce the thickness of the incoming ingot Flat rolling practice Hot rolled round rods (wire rod) are used as the starting material for rod and wire drawing operations The product of the first hot-rolling operation is called a bloom A bloom usually has a square cross-section, at least 150 mm on the side, a rolling into structural shapes such as I-beams and railroad rails . Slabs are rolled into plates and sheets. Billets usually are square and are rolled into various shapes Hot rolling is the most common method of refining the cast structure of ingots and billets to make primary shape. Hot rolled round rods (wire rod) are used as the starting material for rod and wire drawing operations Bars of circular or hexagonal cross-section like Ibeams, channels, and rails are produced in great quantity by hoe rolling with grooved rolls. Cold rolling is most often a secondary forming process that is used to make bar, sheet, strip and foil with superior surface finish and dimensional tolerances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ductility Number Nd Provides a Rigorous Measure for the Ductility of Materials Failure
    XXV. THE DUCTILITY NUMBER ND PROVIDES A RIGOROUS MEASURE FOR THE DUCTILITY OF MATERIALS FAILURE 1. Introduction There was just one decisive, really pivotal occurrence throughout the entire history of trying to develop general failure criteria for homogenous and isotropic materials. The setting was this: Coulomb [1] had laid the original groundwork for failure and then a great many years later Mohr [2] came along and put it into an easily usable form. Thus was born the Mohr- Coulomb theory of failure. There was broad and general enthusiasm when Mohr completed his formulation. Many people thought that the ultimate, general theory of failure had finally arrived. There was however a complication. Theodore von Karman was a young man at the time of Mohr’s developments. He did the critical experimental testing of the esteemed new theory and he found it to be inadequate and inconsistent [3]. Von Karman’s work was of such high quality that his conclusion was taken as final and never successfully contested. He changed an entire course of technical and scientific development. The Mohr-Coulomb failure theory subsided and sank while von Karman’s professional career rose and flourished. Following that, all the attempts at a general materials failure theory remained completely unsatisfactory and unsuccessful (with the singular exception of fracture mechanics). Finally, in recent years a new theory of materials failure has been developed, one that may repair and replace the shortcomings that von Karman uncovered. The present work pursues one special and very important aspect of this new theory, the ductile/brittle failure behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Ductility at the Nanoscale: Deformation and Fracture of Adhesive Contacts Using Atomic Force Microscopy ͒ N
    APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 91, 203114 ͑2007͒ Ductility at the nanoscale: Deformation and fracture of adhesive contacts using atomic force microscopy ͒ N. Pradeepa and D.-I. Kim National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA J. Grobelny National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA and University of Lodz, 90-236 Lodz, Poland T. Hawa National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA and University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA B. Henz U.S. Army Research Laboratory, APG, Maryland 21005, USA M. R. Zachariah National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA and University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA ͑Received 13 September 2007; accepted 30 October 2007; published online 15 November 2007͒ Fracture of nanosize contacts formed between spherical probes and flat surfaces is studied using an atomic force microscope in an ultrahigh vacuum environment. Analysis of the observed deformation during the fracture process indicates significant material extensions for both gold and silica contacts. The separation process begins with an elastic deformation followed by plastic flow of material with atomic rearrangements close to the separation. Classical molecular dynamics studies show similarity between gold and silicon, materials that exhibit entirely different fracture behavior at macroscopic scale. This direct experimental evidence suggests that fracture at nanoscale occurs through a ductile process. © 2007 American Institute of Physics. ͓DOI: 10.1063/1.2815648͔ The nanomechanical properties of materials become in- gold and silica ͑radius ϳ12.5 ␮m͒ were used to form con- creasingly important as they are used for the fabrication of tacts with flat gold and silica samples in separate experi- micro- and nanometer-sized structures with the advent of ments.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Thixocasting and Rheocasting
    A Comparison of Thixocasting and Rheocasting Stephen P. Midson The Midson Group, Inc. Denver, Colorado USA Andrew Jackson Arthur Jackson & Co., Ltd. Brighouse UK Abstract The first semi-solid casting process to be commercialized was thixocasting, where a pre-cast billet is re-heated to the semi-solid solid casting temperature. Advantages of thixocasting include the production of high quality components, while the main disadvantage is the higher cost associated with the production of the pre-cast billets. Commercial pressures have driven casters to examine a different approach to semi-solid casting, where the semi-solid slurry is generated directly from the liquid adjacent to a die casting machine. These processes are collectively referred to as rheocasting, and there are currently at least 15 rheocasting processes either in commercial production or under development around the world. This paper will describe technical aspects of both thixocasting and rheocasting, comparing the procedures used to generate the globular, semi-solid slurry. Two rheocasting processes will be examined in detail, one involved in the production of high integrity properties, while the other is focusing on reducing the porosity content of conventional die castings. Key Words Semi-solid casting, thixocasting, rheocasting, aluminum alloys 22 / 1 Introduction Semi-solid casting is a modified die casting process that reduces or eliminates the porosity present in most die castings [1] . Rather than using liquid metal as the feed material, semi-solid processing uses a higher viscosity feed material that is partially solid and partially liquid. The high viscosity of the semi-solid metal, along with the use of controlled die filling conditions, ensures that the semi-solid metal fills the die in a non-turbulent manner so that harmful gas porosity can be essentially eliminated.
    [Show full text]
  • Heat Treating of Aluminum Alloys
    ASM Handbook, Volume 4: Heat Treating Copyright © 1991 ASM International® ASM Handbook Committee, p 841-879 All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1361/asmhba0001205 www.asminternational.org Heat Treating of Aluminum Alloys HEAT TREATING in its broadest sense, • Aluminum-copper-magnesium systems The mechanism of strengthening from refers to any of the heating and cooling (magnesium intensifies precipitation) precipitation involves the formation of co- operations that are performed for the pur- • Aluminum-magnesium-silicon systems herent clusters of solute atoms (that is, the pose of changing the mechanical properties, with strengthening from Mg2Si solute atoms have collected into a cluster the metallurgical structure, or the residual • Aluminum-zinc-magnesium systems with but still have the same crystal structure as stress state of a metal product. When the strengthening from MgZn2 the solvent phase). This causes a great deal term is applied to aluminum alloys, howev- • Aluminum-zinc-magnesium-copper sys- of strain because of mismatch in size be- er, its use frequently is restricted to the tems tween the solvent and solute atoms. Conse- specific operations' employed to increase quently, the presence of the precipitate par- strength and hardness of the precipitation- The general requirement for precipitation ticles, and even more importantly the strain hardenable wrought and cast alloys. These strengthening of supersaturated solid solu- fields in the matrix surrounding the coher- usually are referred to as the "heat-treat- tions involves the formation of finely dis- ent particles, provide higher strength by able" alloys to distinguish them from those persed precipitates during aging heat treat- obstructing and retarding the movement of alloys in which no significant strengthening ments (which may include either natural aging dislocations.
    [Show full text]
  • Define Malleability and Ductility with Example
    Define Malleability And Ductility With Example Ministrant and undergrown Kim never unbarred upright when Isador purveys his Rameses. Distaff See busy no basset singe allegro after imbrownsJoe bunch so eightfold, afoul. quite unnoted. Calcinable Parsifal mutiny animatingly while Antony always knock his Perspex vaporizes greyly, he Malleability is its substance's ability to deform under pressure compressive stress. New steel alloy is both turnover and ductile Materials Today. How all you identify a ductile fracture? Malleable Definition of Malleable by Merriam-Webster. RUBBER IS DUCTILE DUE date ITS all PROPERTY OF ELASTICITY. ELI5 difference between Ductility & malleability and Reddit. Malleability and ductility Craig Cherney Expert Witness. An increase the high temperatures the ice a dry up energy by malleability refers to save my answer and malleability ductility example, and is used for example sentence contains offensive content variations in. How can use malleable in a sentence WordHippo. Ductility is the percent elongation reported in a tensile test is defined as the maximum elongation of the gage length divided by paper original gage length. Malleable Meaning in tamil what is meaning of malleable in tamil dictionary. 1 the malleability of something enough can be drawn into threads or wires or. Clay not Play-Doh is however best novel of sale with high malleability it does be sculpted into account anything so might's very malleable A cinder block cart no. Examples of malleable metals are still iron aluminum copper silver may lead Ductility and malleability don't invariably correlate to one. Ductile Failure an overview ScienceDirect Topics. MALLEABLE definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary.
    [Show full text]
  • Prediction of Strength and Ductility in Partially Recrystallized Cocrfeniti0.2 High-Entropy Alloy
    entropy Article Prediction of Strength and Ductility in Partially Recrystallized CoCrFeNiTi0.2 High-Entropy Alloy Hanwen Zhang 1, Peizhi Liu 2, Jinxiong Hou 1, Junwei Qiao 1,2,* and Yucheng Wu 2,* 1 College of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; [email protected] (H.Z.); [email protected] (J.H.) 2 Key Laboratory of Interface Science and Engineering in Advanced Materials, Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.Q.); [email protected] (Y.W.) Received: 24 February 2019; Accepted: 28 March 2019; Published: 11 April 2019 Abstract: The mechanical behavior of a partially recrystallized fcc-CoCrFeNiTi0.2 high entropy alloys (HEA) is investigated. Temporal evolutions of the morphology, size, and volume fraction of ◦ the nanoscaled L12-(Ni,Co)3Ti precipitates at 800 C with various aging time were quantitatively evaluated. The ultimate tensile strength can be greatly improved to ~1200 MPa, accompanied with a tensile elongation of ~20% after precipitation. The temporal exponents for the average size and number density of precipitates reasonably conform the predictions by the PV model. A composite model was proposed to describe the plastic strain of the current HEA. As a consequence, the tensile strength and tensile elongation are well predicted, which is in accord with the experimental results. The present experiment provides a theoretical reference for the strengthening of partially recrystallized single-phase HEAs in the future. Keywords: high entropy alloys; precipitation kinetics; strengthening mechanisms; elongation prediction 1. Introduction High entropy alloys (HEAs), a new class of structural materials, have attracted a great deal of attention in recent years on account of their special intrinsic characteristics [1–9], such as high configuration entropy [10], sluggish atomic diffusion [11], and large lattice distortion [12].
    [Show full text]
  • Solid Solution Softening and Enhanced Ductility in Concentrated FCC Silver Solid Solution Alloys
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works Title Solid solution softening and enhanced ductility in concentrated FCC silver solid solution alloys Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7d05p55k Authors Huo, Yongjun Wu, Jiaqi Lee, Chin C Publication Date 2018-06-27 DOI 10.1016/j.msea.2018.05.057 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Materials Science & Engineering A 729 (2018) 208–218 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Materials Science & Engineering A journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/msea Solid solution softening and enhanced ductility in concentrated FCC silver T solid solution alloys ⁎ Yongjun Huoa,b, , Jiaqi Wua,b, Chin C. Leea,b a Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2660, United States b Materials and Manufacturing Technology University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2660, United States ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The major adoptions of silver-based bonding wires and silver-sintering methods in the electronic packaging Concentrated solid solutions industry have incited the fundamental material properties research on the silver-based alloys. Recently, an Solid solution softening abnormal phenomenon, namely, solid solution softening, was observed in stress vs. strain characterization of Ag- Twinning-induced plasticity In solid solution. In this paper, the mechanical properties of additional concentrated silver solid solution phases Localized homologous temperature with other solute elements, Al, Ga and Sn, have been experimentally determined, with their work hardening Advanced joining materials behaviors and the corresponding fractography further analyzed. Particularly, the concentrated Ag-Ga solid so- lution has been discovered to possess the best combination of mechanical properties, namely, lowest yield strength, highest ductility and highest strength, among the concentrated solid solutions of the current study.
    [Show full text]
  • Microalloyed Structural Plate Rolling Heat Treatment and Applications
    MICROALLOYED STRUCTURAL PLATE ROLLING HEAT TREATMENT AND APPLICATIONS A. Streisselberger, V. Schwinn and R. Hubo AG der Dillinger Huettenwerke 66748 Dillingen, Germany Abstract Structural plates with a superior combination of mechanical properties and weldability are the result of a synergistic effect of microalloyed low carbon equivalent composition plus sophisticated thermo-mechanical control process variants or heat treatment during production in the plate mill. The paper considers both the production routes of such plate and the applications based on the beneficial type of microstructure and property profile. Introduction At the beginning of the 21st century sophisticated materials are used in the challenging field of civil engineering, construction and architecture. As an important type of material modern structural heavy plates are considered in this paper in terms of their development, production and use. The understanding of the role of microstructural features in relation to alloying elements, in particular microalloying elements, will be explored. In addition the exploitation of modern facilities in a plate mill, the tayloring of property combinations and the resulting possibilities for the construction industries are explained and illustrated with selected examples. Production of Structural Plates Requirements Made on the Plate Production Process The following requirements are generally made on heavy plate: It must possess: · The specified dimensions within narrow tolerances and with good flatness (thicknesses may range from 5 to 500mm and widths from around 1 to 5m ); · The yield and tensile strength required by the designers (yield strengths from around 235N/mm² to above 1100N/mm² can be specified); · The toughness required by designers which may include low temperature; · Ease the fabrication (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Rolling Temperatures on Sticking Behavior of Ferritic Stainless Steels
    ISIJ International, Vol. 38 (1998), No. 7, pp. 739-743 Effect of Roll and Rolling Temperatures on Sticking Behavior of Ferritic Stainless Steels WonJIN. Jeom-YongCHOIand Yun-YongLEE Stainless Steel Research Team, Technical Research Laboratories, Pohanglron & Steel Co,, Ltd.. PohangP.O. Box 36, 1, Koedong-dong, Pohang-shi. Kyungbuk, Korea, E-mail: pc543552@smail,posco.kr (Received on December5. 1997.• accepted in final form on February 23. 1998) The sticking behavior of several austenitic and ferritic stainless steels under the hot roiling conditions wasexaminedin detail using a two disk type hot rolling simulator. Thesticking of bare metal to roll surfaces wasstrong!y dependenton the high temperature tensile strength and the oxidation resistance of the stainless steel, Asteel having higher tensile strength and lower oxidation resistance exhibited better resistance against sticking. The sticking occurred in increasing severity in the order of 430J1 L, 436L, 430 and 409L. It was clarified that a high speedsteel (HSS) rol[ wasmorebeneficial to prevent sticking compared to a Hi-Cr roll. KEYWORDS: ferritic stainless steel; sticking behavior; hot rolling; high speedsteel roll; high chromiumroll. l. Introduction 2. Experiments Thesticking phenomenonoccurs frequently during the A sticking simulator wasused to investigate the effect hot rolling of ferritic stainless steels, causing surface of hot rolling conditions on sticking behavior. Figure 1 defects on the mill product andscoring on the roll surface. showsthe schematic diagram of the sticking
    [Show full text]
  • Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2
    Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2 February 15, 2006 . DRAFT Cambridge-MIT Institute Multidisciplinary Design Project This Dictionary/Glossary of Engineering terms has been compiled to compliment the work developed as part of the Multi-disciplinary Design Project (MDP), which is a programme to develop teaching material and kits to aid the running of mechtronics projects in Universities and Schools. The project is being carried out with support from the Cambridge-MIT Institute undergraduate teaching programe. For more information about the project please visit the MDP website at http://www-mdp.eng.cam.ac.uk or contact Dr. Peter Long Prof. Alex Slocum Cambridge University Engineering Department Massachusetts Institute of Technology Trumpington Street, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge. Cambridge MA 02139-4307 CB2 1PZ. USA e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] tel: +44 (0) 1223 332779 tel: +1 617 253 0012 For information about the CMI initiative please see Cambridge-MIT Institute website :- http://www.cambridge-mit.org CMI CMI, University of Cambridge Massachusetts Institute of Technology 10 Miller’s Yard, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Mill Lane, Cambridge MA 02139-4307 Cambridge. CB2 1RQ. USA tel: +44 (0) 1223 327207 tel. +1 617 253 7732 fax: +44 (0) 1223 765891 fax. +1 617 258 8539 . DRAFT 2 CMI-MDP Programme 1 Introduction This dictionary/glossary has not been developed as a definative work but as a useful reference book for engi- neering students to search when looking for the meaning of a word/phrase. It has been compiled from a number of existing glossaries together with a number of local additions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ductility & Bend Formality
    Wire Facts / Ductility and Bend Formability There are several measures of ductility for metallic materials. Elongation indicates ductility in tension. However, formed parts may require bending, coining, folding, heading, etc., and one measure such as elongation, may not adequately represent other ductility requirements, such as bend formability. Bend formability indicates the ability of a material to form around a radius without crack- ing. The minimum bend radius is the minimum radius over which a sample can be formed without fracturing. Bend formability values are expressed by the ratio of the minimum bend radius (MBR) divided by the thickness (t) of the material, MBR/t. Test procedures for measuring bend formability can be found in ASTM E 290 and B 820. Bend testing of strip material is performed in the longitudinal, i.e. rolling direction, as well as the transverse direction as illustrated. Typical solid solution alloys have superior bend properties (Good Way Bends) in the longitudinal direction relative to the transverse direction (Bad Way Bends). Wire naturally bends in the Good Way, longitudinal direction. Hence, there are no Bad Way bends in wire. Another factor that allows for better bend formability in wire as compared to strip relates to the width to thickness ratios of the materials. Wire typically has a width to thickness ratio of one (1). Therefore, the deformation mode for wire is plane stress which allows for more formability before fracture. Strip, however, commonly has a width to thickness ratio of eight (8) or greater. These high width to thickness ratios assure plane strain deformation, which by limiting localized strain, adversely affects ductility.
    [Show full text]