DOCSLIB.ORG

Of Kenai Peninsula, Alaska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Of Kenai Peninsula, Alaska Series / A' Economic Geology, 65 Bulletin No. 277 series Descriptive Geology) go DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHAELES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR OF KENAI PENINSULA, ALASKA GOLD FIELDS OF THE TURNAGAIN ARM REGION FRED H. MOFFIT. RALPH W. STONE WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1906 CONTENTS. Goui FIELDS OF THE TUKNAGAIN AKM REGION, BY F. H. MOFFIT.... ........ 7 Introduction ..-_........---.-....................................... 1.. 7 ', Location and area ................................................. 7 History............................................... ........... 7 Early explorers .............'................................. 7 Mining....................................:............... 8 Early mining ..........................................'.. 8 Placer development ...................................... 8 Exploration and scientific-investigation ........................ "J.O . Early exploration ........................................ 10 Investigation in 1904 ...................................... 10 Topography.. _........._....................................,.....;.. 12 Shore line ...:..........-......................................... 12 Relief ............................................................ 13 Drainage........................................................ ' 14 General geology...................................................... 16 Sedimentary rocks................................................. 16 Distribution........-.........................;............... 16 Sunrise "series" ............................................. 17 Occurrence ..................................'...,......... 17 Character................................................ 17 Age..................................................... 18 Cherts.................................:..............-...... 19 Occurrence .............................................. 19 . Character................................................ 19 Age ..................................................... 19 Lower Jurassic beds .......................................... 20 Occurrence .......... v................................... 20 Character................................................ 20 Age...................................................... 21 Kenai formation ............................................. 22 Igneous rocks.................................................... 23 Classification.................................................. 23 Diabase.............................. .....................;.. 23 Gabbro...........-................................:......... 24 Dikes................... .-...... ...................'.....;..... 24 Dacite-porphyry ....................................... .. 24 Diabase .................................................. 24 Rhyolite................................................. 24 Granite......................................... ............ 24 Surficial deposits................................................. 25 Classification ................................................ 25 Water-laid deposits........................................... 25 High gravels............................................. 25 Stream deposits .......................................... 27 Glacier deposits ........................'....................., 27 3 4 CONTENTS. GOLD FIELDS OF THE TURN AGAIN ARM REGION Continued. Page. Geologic history .................. s................................... 28 Development of topography....................................... 28 General statement............................................ 28 Formation of peneplain....................................... 28 Uplift and erosion............................................. 28 Beginning of glaciation ....................................... 28 Deformation .......:......................................... 28 Relations of Kenai and Chugach plateaus ........................... 30 Glaciation ........................................................ 31 Summary.......................................................... 33 Economic geology.................................................... 33 Gold ............................................................ 33 Placer deposits............................................... 33 General statement........................................ 33 Resurrection Creek Valley ................................ 34 Resurrection Creek................................... 34 Palmer Creek........................................ 35 Bear Creek .......................................... 36 Sixmile Creek Valley....................................... 36 Sixmile Creek........................................ 37 Canyon Creek........................................_ 37 Mills Creek.......................................... 38 East Fork............................................ 39 Gulch Creek ......................................... 39 Lynx Creek.......................................... 40 Silvertip Creek....................................... 40 Granite Creek........................................ 40 Glacier Creek Valley ..................................... 40 Crow Creek.......................................... 41 California Creek...................................... 43 Winner Creek........................................ 43 ' Miscellaneous localities ................................... 43 Small tributaries'of Tumagain Arm.................... 43 Kenai Eiver Valley................................... 43 Tustumena Lake ..................................... 44 Anchor Point........................................ 44 Source of the placer deposits ......................-..-.-'.. 44 Auriferous lodes.............................................. 46 Bear Creek veins......................................... 46 Sawmill Creek veins...................................... 47 Miscellaneous veins ....................................... 47 Copper ........................................................... 48 Economic conditions................................................... 48 Routes and trails................................................. 48 Climate.......................................................... 49 Timber and vegetation............................................ 50 Natives.......................................................... 51 Game and fish.................................................... 51 Conclusions...................................... 1 ............... 52 COAL FIELDS OF THE KACHEMAK BAY REGION, BY RALPH W. STONE. .......... 53 Introduction................................... ...................... 53 Location......................................................... 53 Investigation..................................................... 53 CONTENTS. 5 COAL FIELDS OF THE KACHEMAK BAY REGION Continued. Page. Introduction Continued. Mining developments............................................. 54 History..........................'............................ 54 Production .................................................. 56 Topography ......................................................... 56 Geology ............................................................. 57 General statement................................................ 57 Kenai formation ................................................. 57 Distribution ................................................. 57 . Character.................................................... 57 Thickness ................................................... 58 Age ......................................................... 58 Stratigraphic relations ........................................ 59 Deformation................................................. 59 The coal.......................... .................................... 59 Occurrence and development..............'.......................... 59 North side of Kachemak Bay. .................................. 59 Anchor Point............................................ 59 Bluff Point.......-.................................:..... 60 Mine camp .......^.........^............................ 61 Fritz Creek .............................................. 62 McNeil Creek............................................. 63 Cottonwood Creek........................................ 64 Eastland Creek........................................... 65 . Falls Creek .............................................. 65 Port Graham................................................. 66 South side of Kachemak Bay.................................. 68 Character........ ; ...........1.-.........-_...................... 68 Analyses-...............I.................................... 68 Tests and conclusions......................... 1.. ............ 70 Future prospects .............................................. 73 Summary............................................................ 73 Index ____..._.----......-.. .-...............................'.-...._. 75 ILLUSTRATIONS. Page. PLATE T. Outline map of Alaska, showing areas covered by larger-scale maps (Pis. Hand XIII)............................................. 7 II. Topographic reconnaissance map of a portion of the northern part of Kenai Peninsula r ....................................... In pocket. III. Head of Turnagain Arm at low tide.............................. 12 IV. A, Jurassic cherty limestone, etc., at Port Graham; B, Contorted cherts at Seldovia Bay......................................... V. A and J3, Panoramic view from head of Resurrection Creek........ VI.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Criteria for Determining an Unusual Marine Mammal Morbidity/Mortality Event (Appendix 1), 4 Apply to the Current Sea Otter Situation
    Marine Mammal Unusual Mortality Event Initiation Protocol The formal determination of a marine mammal Unusual Mortality Event (UME) is made by the Marine Mammal Health and Stranding Response Program, following consultation with the Working Group on Marine Mammal Unusual Mortality Events (WG). The WG considers a suite of information provided by the person reporting the unusual mortalities, relative to a set of Criteria (see Appendix 1, below), and makes recommendations to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). Expeditious determinations require receipt of organized, comprehensive sets of appropriate current and historical data. Submission of minimal or disorganized datasets can delay a formal determination because of the time involved as the WG requests and awaits additional information. The following summary is provided to facilitate the development of an initial data package for consideration. If you have any questions, please contact your NMFS Regional Stranding Coordinator, FWS Species Coordinator, or the WG’s Executive Secretary, Trevor Spradlin, at (301) 713-2322 ext 103 ([email protected]). Information on Current Situation 1. Name and contact information of person reporting unusual mortalities a. Name: Verena A. Gill b. Institution: Marine Mammals Management Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service c. Address: 1011 East Tudor Road, MS 341, Anchorage, Alaska 99503 d. Telephone numbers (office, cell): 907-786-3584/250-3721 e. Fax number: 907-786-3816 f. E-mail address(es): [email protected] g. Collaborating organizations: Alaska SeaLife Center, Alaska Veterinary Pathology Services. Location: (describe full geographic range, give latitude and longitude of limits): Although sea otters strand for a variety of reasons (including disease, boat strikes, starvation, inter- and intra-specific trauma), this mortality event addresses an unusually high number of cases that have been diagnosed as having died from Streptococcus bovis endocarditis/septicemia (SBE/S).
    [Show full text]
  • Deposition and Preservation of Estuarine Sediment, Turnagain Arm, Cook Inlet, Alaska
    DEPOSITION AND PRESERVATION OF ESTUARINE SEDIMENT, TURNAGAIN ARM, COOK INLET, ALASKA by DARRON G DEBOER B.S., Kansas State University, 2007 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Geology College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2009 Approved by: Major Professor Allen W. Archer Copyright DARRON GRANT DEBOER 2009 Abstract Turnagain Arm is the hypertidal (commonly exceeding 9 m) west-east trending extension of Cook Inlet in south-central Alaska. The inlet formed from a drowned glacial valley that was subsequently filled with tidal deposits of silt and fine sand. The tidal system is semidiurnal with a prominent diurnal inequality. There are also variations due to spring and neap tides. Turnagain Arm is home to a tidal bore generated during spring tides that can reach heights of up to 2 m and travel at speeds of up to 5 m/s. Current reversals can be dramatic with ebb tidal velocities of 6 m/s changing to flood velocities of 10 m/s over a period of a few minutes. During the initial flood tide, highly turbid water can rise as fast as 10 cm/min. This combination of elements results in a highly dynamic depositional setting. Measurements taken in the inner estuary during several neap-spring cycles in the summers of 2007-08 documented deposition upon mud bars of as much as 8.9 cm per tidal event. Conversely, erosion of up to 13.5 cm per tidal event has been measured. The highest rates of deposition and erosion occurred during the spring tides while much lower rates occur during the neap tides.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Impacts of Prudhoe Bay Shut Down on Alaska Refinery Output
    KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH Oil & Gas, Mining & Special Projects Office 144 N. Binkley Street Soldotna, Alaska 99669 BUSINESS: (907) 714-2335 FAX: (907) 262-8616 [email protected] www.cookinletoilandgas.org JOHN J. WILLIAMS BOROUGH MAYOR To: Mayor John J. Williams Thru: Tim Navarre, Chief of Staff Date: August 8, 2006 From: Bill Popp, Oil, Gas & Mining Liaison Subject: Possible impacts of Prudhoe Bay shut down on Alaska refinery output This preliminary analysis is a follow up on the “first take” my office provided on August 7th regarding the possible impacts of the Prudhoe Bay oil field closure. In particular, the effects on Alaska’s total refinery output of finished petroleum products and the ripple effects that may be felt in the communities of the Kenai Peninsula Borough. As pointed out in the “first take,” there could be significant impacts on in-state production of motor diesel, home heating fuels, power generation fuels, jet fuels and gasoline. These impacts could lead to price spikes and shortages for these fuels unless the refiners are able to secure either adequate alternative supplies of refined products from outside of Alaska, or alternative supply contracts for North Slope crude oil originating from fields other than Prudhoe Bay. 1. Existing refineries, total through puts and outputs and total Alaska consumption Alaska currently has 6 refineries. Two refineries are based on the North Slope and only serve that region. Two refineries are based in Fairbanks. One is based in Valdez and one is based in Nikiski. The four refineries based in Fairbanks, Valdez and Nikiski serve the major population centers of Alaska and will be the focus of this analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Admiralty Island National Monument
    ADMIRALTY ISLAND NATIONAL MONUMENT DESCRIPTION At a glance: Admiralty Island National Monument (NM) is located on Admiralty Island NM quick facts Admiralty Island, 15 miles southwest of Juneau in south- east Alaska, and is accessible only by water or air. The Date established: Dec. 1, 1978; Dec. 2, 1980 island is characterized by rugged coastline, remote old growth rainforest, towering mountains, and alpine tundra Established by: Presidential proclamation, President with permanent icefields. It hosts the largest concentration Jimmy Carter (1978); Congressional designation, Public of brown bears and nesting bald eagles in the world, as Law 96-487 (1980) well as harbor seals, porpoises and sea lions, humpback Forest Service region: 10, Alaska Region whales, and all five species of Pacific salmon in its waters. More than 90 percent of the monument is designated as State: Alaska the Kootznoowoo Wilderness, nearly 1 million acres. Ad- Associated national forest: Tongass miralty Island has been the home to the Tlingít people for approximately 10,000 years. The monument area continues Total Forest Service acres: 997,226 to provide subsistence for these Alaskan Natives. Angoon, Reasons designated: “archaeological, cultural, and Admiralty Island’s only permanent community, continues historical resources, ecological and scientific value” to be an important cultural base. (Presidential Proclamation, 1978) BACKGROUND The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANSCA) of 1971 honored the rights of Alaska Natives to select approxi- People and visitors mately 44 million acres of Federal land in Alaska and au- thorized the Secretary of the Interior to withdraw 80 mil- Nearest metropolitan area: no metro areas within lion acres of land to be studied for possible additions to 500 miles the National Park, Wildlife Refuge, Wild and Scenic Rivers, and National Forest systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 4.3 TURNAGAIN
    Anchorage WetlandsManagement Plan -2012Public HearingDraft Page97 Table 4.3 TURNAGAIN ARM WETLAND DESIGNATIONS, ENFORCEABLE AND ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES Note: General Permits: The Corps of Engineers issued five separate General Permits (GPs) to the Municipality that covers development projects in “C” wetlands in Anchorage. The GPs are reviewed and renewed every five years. The most recent Anchorage GPs were issued in April, 2010. Under current GP procedures, the Municipality determines whether a proposed fill project in “C” wetlands is consistent with the GP terms and conditions. The Anchorage GPs are applied to only “C” wetlands as designated in the AWMP. The GPs do not apply to “A” or “B” wetlands and some “C” sites are excluded. Attachment A-Table 1 of the Anchorage GPs identifies which “C” wetland parcels are eligible for and which are excluded from the GPs. Attachment B-Table 3 of the GPs assigns site specific restrictions and design criteria to each eligible “C” wetland. The AWMP Table 4.1 management strategies notes which “C” wetlands are eligible for the GPs and references applicable site-specific restrictions and design criteria assigned to each site in the GPs. Refer to the current GPs for details and explanations of these requirements. Link: http://www.muni.org/departments/ocpd/planning/physical/envplanning/Pages/default.aspx. During the issuance of the current General Permits, the Corps included several previously unmapped wetlands as eligible for the GP. These are referenced as “U” wetlands in the General Permit documents. This AWMP revision includes these “U” sites and designates them as “C.” *(New sites now classified as “D” or “P” and former “U” sites now designated “C” are listed in blue.) Site #, listed in column 1 of the table, references individual wetland sites or collective groups of wetlands that are in the same geographic area and perform similar functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Region, Alaska
    Geology of the Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Region, Alaska Including the Kenai, Seldovia, Seward, Blying Sound, Cordova, and Middleton Island 1:250,000-scale quadrangles By Frederic H. Wilson and Chad P. Hults Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3110 View looking east down Harriman Fiord at Serpentine Glacier and Mount Gilbert. (photograph by M.L. Miller) 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Geographic, Physiographic, and Geologic Framework ..........................................................................1 Description of Map Units .............................................................................................................................3 Unconsolidated deposits ....................................................................................................................3 Surficial deposits ........................................................................................................................3 Rock Units West of the Border Ranges Fault System ....................................................................5 Bedded rocks ...............................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Kachemak Bay State Park and Kachemak Bay State Wilderness Park
    Management Plan For Kachemak Bay State Park And Kachemak Bay State Wilderness Park ~NAruRAL 01 March 1995 ~RESOURCES This publication was released by the Department of Natural Resources, produced at a cost of $8.96 per copy to provide a Cover photo by: Jeffrey S. Johnson Kachemak Bay State Park management plan View of the Kenai Mountains from for the public and other agencies. It was Nuka Island printed in Anchorage, Alaska. Management Plan for Kachemak Bay State Park and Kachemak Bay State Wilderness Park March 1995 State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks & Outdoor Recreation TONYKNOWLE~GOVERNOR 3601 C STREET, SUITE 1200 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503-5921 PHONE: (907) 762-2600 FAX: (907) 762-2535 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION April 6, 1995 Dear Alaskan: Kachemak Bay State Park, Alaska's first state park, is known for its scenic beauty, richness of wildlife, and a grand variety of recreation opportunities. Those who visit Kachemak Bay State Park and Wilderness Park are richly rewarded by their experience. The park's last management plan was written in 1989. Since then, several important events have occurred. • In March of 1989, the Exxon Valdez oil spill hit the beaches of the wilderness park. • That same year, the legislature added more than 50,000 acres of state land to the park, including Nuka Island. • The long-standing threat of logging within the park was resolved with the purchase of more than 24,000 acres of private lands and timber rights, with funds from the civil and criminal settlements against Exxon.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Otter Surivival and Movements
    MONITORING SURVIVAL AND MOVEMENT PATTERNS OF SEA OTTERS (ENHYDRA LUTRIS KENYONI) IN KACHEMAK BAY, ALASKA AUGUST 2007-APRIL 2010 BY ANGELA M. DOROFF AND ORIANA BADAJOS FINAL REPORT TO: MARINE MAMMALS MANAGEMENT U. S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 1011 E. TUDOR ROAD ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 30 JUNE 2010 Kachemak Bay Research Reserve, 95 Sterling Highway Suite 2 Homer, Alaska 99603 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................... iii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 2 METHODS ................................................................................................................................................. 2 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................................. 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Regions by Zip Code
    Alaska Zip Codes Region Borough / Census Area Community Zipcode Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99501 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99502 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99503 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99504 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99505 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99507 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99508 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99509 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99510 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99511 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99512 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99513 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99514 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99515 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99516 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99517 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99518 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99519 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99520 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99521 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99522 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99523 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99524 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99540 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99599 Anchorage Anchorage Anchorage 99695 Anchorage Anchorage Chugiak 99567 Anchorage Anchorage Eagle River 99577 Anchorage Anchorage Elmendorf AFB 99506 Anchorage Anchorage Fort Richardson 99505 Anchorage Anchorage Girdwood 99587 Anchorage Anchorage Girdwood 99693 Anchorage Anchorage Indian 99540 Northern Bethel Akiachak 99551 Northern Bethel Akiak 99552 Alaska Zip Codes Region Borough / Census Area Community Zipcode Northern Bethel Aniak 99557 Northern Bethel Atmautluak 99559 Northern Bethel Bethel 99559 Northern Bethel Bethel 99637 Northern Bethel Bethel 99679 Northern Bethel Bethel 99680 Northern
    [Show full text]
  • Physiography, Texture, and Bedforms in Knik Arm, Upper Cook Inlet, Alaska
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PHYSIOGRAPHY, TEXTURE, AND BEDFORMS IN KNIK ARM, UPPER COOK INLET, ALASKA DURING JUNE AND JULY, 1980 by Susan Bartsch-Winkler Open File Report 82 - 464 1982 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature INTRODUCTION Knik Arm is located in upper Cook Inlet, and extends from the mouths of the Knik and Matanuska rivers on its northeastern end to the narrows formed by Point MacKenzie and Point Woronzof on its southwest­ ern end (figure 1). The Knik Arm estuary is approximately 50 km long and 6 km wide. It is surrounded by low-lying glacial debris of Pleist­ ocene and Holocene ages (Karlstrom, 1964). The city of Anchorage and its outlying suburban communities are located along the southern shore, and the rural expansion into the Matanuska Valley, including the small village of Knik, flank its northeastern and northern shoreline. The areas to the north and northwest are currently undergoing rapid commer­ cial and industrial expansion, and feasibility studies of several sites are underway for the Knik Arm bridge crossing to link the larger communities on the south shore with the rapidly developing areas to the north and northwest. This textural study represents baseline data for Knik Arm sedi­ ments prior to any major man-made alteration of the upper Inlet region. The setting is macrotidal, with tide ranges in excess of 35 feet (10 meters). A small tidal bore less than 1/3 meter in height accompanies each incoming tide, forming near the limit of the intertidal zone near Goose Bay and the Eagle River mudflats and then moves slowly northeast­ ward up the Arm (figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Seward Alaska
    2017 community services directory health, recreation & community organizations seward alaska Seward Prevention Coalition wellness | education | advocacy | support Table of Contents Emergency Services 1-3 Health Services 3-6 Community Resources 6-11 Community Service Organizations 11-12 Recreation 12-14 Education 14-16 Parent & Youth Resources 16-19 Fellowships 19-20 Tourism, Information & Media 21-22 Transportation & Housing 22-23 Alaska Resources 23-24 Facebook Listings 25 Emergency Services IN CASE OF EMERGENCY DIAL 911 LAW ENFORCEMENT Alaska State Troopers .............................................................. 224-3346 201 Third Avenue, Suite 202 Soldotna Dispatch ................................................................907-262-4453 www.dps.state.ak.us/ast Seward Police Department ...................................................... 224-3338 410 Adams Street / P.O. Box 167 www.cityofseward.us FIRE SERVICES Bear Creek Volunteer Fire & Emergency Medical Services 224-3345 13105 Seward Hwy, Mile 5.5 www.kpb.us/service-areas/bcfsa Moose Pass Volunteer Fire Co. 491-5776 Moose Pass, www.moosepassfire.com Seward Volunteer Fire Department 224-3445 316 Fourth Avenue, www.cityofseward.us MEDICAL SERVICES Providence Emergency Clinic 224-2846 417 First Avenue, P.O. Box 365 www.alaska.providence.org/locations/p/psmcc Seward Community Health Center ...... 224-2273 417 First Avenue, www.sewardhealthcenter.org Seward Volunteer Ambulance Corps ... 224-3987 200 D Street, P.O. Box 1136 www.sewardambulance.com 1 ANIMAL CONTROL Alaska SeaLife Center Rescue & Rehabilitation Hotline ......................................888-774-7325 Report stranded marine mammals and birds: www.alaskasealife.org/stranding_guidelines Pet Poison Helpline ...........................................................855-764-7661 www.petpoisonhelpline.com Seward Animal Shelter ............................................................ 224-7495 412 Sixth Avenue, P.O. Box 167 www.petfinder.com/shelters/AK10 Seward Animal Clinic .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Of 18 STATE of ALASKA DEPARTMENT
    STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Seward Highway MP 105-107 Windy Corner Proposed Commissioner’s Finding ADL 232839 (DOT&PF) ADL 232892 (ARRC) ADL 233527 (Closure of Section Line Easement) OSL 1632 (ARRC relinquished lands) 1. Proposed Action The Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT&PF) is proposing to improve the Seward Highway (highway) by relocating the rights-of-way and the railroad rights- of-way of the Alaska Railroad Corporation (ARRC) between highway mileposts (MP) 105 and 107 also known as “Windy Corner,” (project) within Chugach State Park (CSP). The purpose of this project is to implement safety upgrades and improve traffic operations. The highway segment within CSP proposed for improvement supports heavy commercial, recreational, and residential traffic and is located in one of five designated safety corridors in Alaska, due to the elevated rate of high-severity (e.g., fatal and major injury) crashes. As a popular area for viewing wildlife and recreating along the highway, traffic operations are frequently disrupted by motorists slowing and parking along the shoulder of the highway. This creates a high differential in speeds combined with limited sight distance and uncontrolled movements of traffic entering and exiting the highway that results in an elevated rate of severe crashes in the highway corridor. The objective of the project is to address long-standing traffic safety concerns. This will be done by realigning and dividing the highway to meet current design standards, in addition to adding auxiliary lanes for accelerating, decelerating and turning traffic, and constructing a recreational and parking area.
    [Show full text]