DOCSLIB.ORG

Ventral Hippocampal Input to the Prelimbic Cortex Dissociates the Context from the Cue Association in Trace Fear Memory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ventral Hippocampal Input to the Prelimbic Cortex Dissociates the Context from the Cue Association in Trace Fear Memory Research Articles: Systems/Circuits Ventral hippocampal input to the prelimbic cortex dissociates the context from the cue association in trace fear memory https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1453-19.2020 Cite as: J. Neurosci 2020; 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1453-19.2020 Received: 19 June 2019 Revised: 2 March 2020 Accepted: 5 March 2020 This Early Release article has been peer-reviewed and accepted, but has not been through the composition and copyediting processes. The final version may differ slightly in style or formatting and will contain links to any extended data. Alerts: Sign up at www.jneurosci.org/alerts to receive customized email alerts when the fully formatted version of this article is published. Copyright © 2020 Twining et al. 1 Title: Ventral hippocampal input to the prelimbic cortex dissociates the context from the cue 2 association in trace fear memory 3 4 Running Title: VH-PL communication mediates contextual fear learning 5 6 Authors: Robert C. Twining*, Katie Lepak, Adam J. Kirry, Marieke R. Gilmartin* 7 Affiliation: Department of Biomedical Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA. 8 *Corresponding Authors: 9 Marieke R. Gilmartin, Ph.D. 10 E-mail: [email protected] 11 12 Robert C. Twining, Ph.D. 13 E-mail: [email protected] 14 15 16 Number of pages: 44 17 Number of figures: 6 18 Number of words: Abstract: 238 Introduction: 682 Discussion: 1916 19 20 Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing financial interests. 21 22 Author Contributions: RCT and MRG designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. RCT 23 performed the surgeries and analyzed the data. RCT and KL ran the experiments. KL and AJK 24 performed histological analysis. AJK provided critical feedback on the manuscript. 25 26 Acknowledgments: This work was supported by the Whitehall Foundation (2014-8-67 to MRG) and 27 the National Science Foundation (IOS:1558121 to MRG). 28 29 30 Twining et al. 31 Abstract 32 The prefrontal cortex, through its high degree of interconnectivity with cortical and subcortical 33 brain areas, mediates cognitive and emotional processes in support of adaptive behaviors. This 34 includes the formation of fear memories when the anticipation of threat demands learning about 35 temporal or contextual cues, as in trace fear conditioning. In this variant of fear learning, the 36 association of a cue and shock across an empty trace interval of several seconds requires sustained 37 cue-elicited firing in the prelimbic cortex (PL). However, it is unknown how and when distinct PL 38 afferents contribute to different associative components of memory. Among the prominent inputs to PL, 39 the hippocampus shares with PL a role in both working memory and contextual processing. Here we 40 tested the necessity of direct hippocampal input to the PL for the acquisition of trace cued fear memory 41 and the simultaneously acquired contextual fear association. Optogenetic silencing of ventral 42 hippocampal (VH) terminals in the PL of adult male Long-Evans rats selectively during paired trials 43 revealed that direct communication between the VH and PL during training is necessary for contextual 44 fear memory, but not for trace cued fear acquisition. The pattern of the contextual memory deficit and 45 the disruption of local PL firing during optogenetic silencing of VH-PL suggest that the VH continuously 46 updates the PL with the current contextual state of the animal, which when disrupted during memory 47 acquisition is detrimental to the subsequent rapid retrieval of aversive contextual associations. 48 49 50 51 Keywords: memory formation, fear conditioning, optogenetics, working memory 52 53 2 Twining et al. 54 Significance Statement 55 56 Learning to anticipate threat from available contextual and discrete cues is crucial for survival. 57 The prelimbic cortex is required for forming fear memories when temporal or contextual complexity is 58 involved, as in trace fear conditioning. However, the respective contribution of distinct prelimbic 59 afferents to the temporal and contextual components of memory is not known. We report that direct 60 input from the ventral hippocampus enables the formation of the contextual, but not trace cued, fear 61 memory necessary for the subsequent rapid expression of a fear response. This finding dissociates the 62 contextual and working memory contributions of prelimbic cortex to the formation of a fear memory and 63 demonstrates the crucial role for hippocampal input in contextual fear learning. 64 3 Twining et al. 65 Introduction 66 The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is an integral component of a neural system that mediates cognitive 67 and emotional processes and regulates a wide range of adaptive behaviors (Euston et al., 2012; Godsil 68 et al., 2013; Hiser and Koenigs, 2018). Through its interconnectivity with cortical and subcortical areas, 69 the PFC integrates previously learned information with current emotional and motivational states of the 70 animal to guide behavior. However, it is increasingly clear that the PFC is crucial for the initial encoding 71 of some memories, including associative fear memories. The prelimbic (PL) and anterior cingulate 72 cortices of the rodent are necessary for fear learning when temporal or contextual processing is needed 73 (Han et al., 2003; Zhao et al., 2005; Gilmartin and Helmstetter, 2010; Guimarais et al., 2011; Gilmartin 74 et al., 2013b; Gilmartin et al., 2014; Heroux et al., 2017; Robinson-Drummer et al., 2017; Kirry et al., 75 2019). The acquisition of trace fear memory includes both temporal and contextual components for 76 which the PL is necessary, but how these components are regulated by afferent input to PL is 77 unknown. Trace fear conditioning requires subjects to associate an auditory conditional stimulus (CS) 78 and an aversive footshock unconditional stimulus (UCS) that are separated in time. The presence of 79 this temporal gap recruits episodic memory systems, including the hippocampus and PFC. Functional 80 disruption of either area severely impairs the acquisition of fear to the trace-CS and also the 81 background context-shock association formed at the same time (Yoon and Otto, 2007; Czerniawski et 82 al., 2009; Esclassan et al., 2009; Gilmartin and Helmstetter, 2010; Czerniawski et al., 2011; Guimarais 83 et al., 2011; Gilmartin et al., 2012, 2013a). In PL, a subset of neurons exhibit sustained increases in 84 firing in response to a trace-CS and throughout the trace interval, similar to cue-elicited delay-cell 85 activity in primate dorsolateral PFC during working-memory tasks (Baeg et al., 2001; Gilmartin and 86 McEchron, 2005). Optogenetic inhibition of PL firing selectively during the trace interval prevented 87 animals from learning the predictive cue-shock relationship while leaving contextual learning intact 88 (Gilmartin et al., 2013b). Thus, a specific PL signal promotes the anticipation of threat through a 89 working-memory-like function, but how specific inputs to the PFC contribute to the nature of this signal 90 and learning is unknown. 4 Twining et al. 91 Among the major afferents to the PFC, the ventral hippocampus (VH) is a likely partner in 92 memory formation for salient events. The VH receives valence-encoded information from both CS- 93 responsive and appetitive UCS-responsive amygdala neurons (Beyeler et al., 2016; Beyeler et al., 94 2018), and VH neurons respond robustly to an aversive UCS (Weible et al., 2006). The PL PFC 95 receives monosynaptic input from the VH, which is glutamatergic (Jay et al., 1989; Jay and Witter, 96 1991; Cenquizca and Swanson, 2007; Hoover and Vertes, 2007; Parent et al., 2010). A functional 97 interaction between the hippocampus and PFC has been implicated, but not demonstrated, in cue 98 encoding during a related associative paradigm, trace eyeblink conditioning. Prefrontal firing was 99 phase-locked to hippocampal theta, and sustained prefrontal firing to the CS was observed only on 100 trials delivered during hippocampal theta (Darling et al., 2011). Disrupted hippocampal-prefrontal 101 connectivity is associated with working-memory deficits in humans diagnosed with schizophrenia 102 (Sigurdsson and Duvarci, 2015; Schneider et al., 2017) and with poor spatial working-memory 103 performance in genetic mouse models of schizophrenia (Sigurdsson et al., 2010). Moreover, 104 optogenetic inhibition of the VH-PL pathway in wild-type mice produced similar working-memory deficits 105 (Spellman et al., 2015). These deficits were specific to the encoding of spatial cues, consistent with 106 recent work highlighting the importance of VH-PL for contextual processing. Inhibition of VH input 107 disrupted prefrontal encoding of aversive locations in anxiety-provoking contexts (Padilla-Coreano et 108 al., 2016), and silencing VH-IL impaired context-modulated fear renewal after extinction (Marek et al., 109 2018). These findings raise the question of whether VH-PL mediates prefrontal encoding of cues more 110 generally to include non-spatial temporal associative learning in addition to spatial working memory or if 111 VH-PL input preferentially conveys contextual information. Here we use projection-specific 112 optogenetics to selectively silence VH terminals in PL during trace fear conditioning and test the 113 hypothesis that both cued and contextual fear memory acquisition depends on VH input to PL. 114 115 Materials & Methods 116 Subjects 5 Twining et al. 117 Adult male Long-Evans rats (325 g; Envigo, Indianapolis, IN) were housed individually in an 118 AAALAC-accredited vivarium and maintained on a 14h:10h light:dark cycle. Rats received food and 119 water ad libitum throughout the experiment. Twenty-eight rats were used in this study: twenty-four for 120 behavior and four for electrophysiological verification of optogenetic terminal silencing. All procedures 121 were in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guidelines and approved by the Marquette 122 University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. 123 Optogenetic viral constructs 124 The adeno-associated viral vector containing the light-sensitive archaerhodopsin from 125 Halorubrum strain TP009 (ArchT; rAAV9/CAG-ArchT-GFP) was prepared by Dr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 613638V1.Full.Pdf
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/613638; this version posted April 18, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Hippocampal network reorganization underlies the formation of a temporal association memory Mohsin S. Ahmed1,2,*, James B. Priestley2,3,4,*, Angel Castro1,2, Fabio Stefanini3,4, Elizabeth M. Balough2,3, Erin Lavoie1,2, Luca Mazzucato2,4,5,6, Stefano Fusi2,4,5, Attila Losonczy2,5y 1 Department of Psychiatry 2 Department of Neuroscience 3 Doctoral Program in Neurobiology and Behavior 4 Center for Theoretical Neuroscience 5 Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 USA 6 Departments of Mathematics and Biology University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 USA ∗ These authors contributed equally to this work y To whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/613638; this version posted April 18, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract 1 Episodic memory requires linking events in time, a function dependent on the hippocampus. In 2 \trace" fear conditioning, animals learn to associate a neutral cue with an aversive stimulus despite 3 their separation in time by a delay period on the order of tens of seconds. But how this temporal 4 association forms remains unclear. Here we use 2-photon calcium imaging to track neural 5 population dynamics over the complete time-course of learning and show that, in contrast to 6 previous theories, the hippocampus does not generate persistent activity to bridge the time delay.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Sleep in Fear Conditioning and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
    Biological Psychiatry: Commentary CNNI The Importance of Sleep in Fear Conditioning and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Robert Stickgold and Dara S. Manoach Abnormal sleep is a prominent feature of Axis I neuropsychia- fear and distress are extinguished. Based on a compelling tric disorders and is often included in their DSM-5 diagnostic body of work from human and rodent studies, fear extinction criteria. While often viewed as secondary, because these reflects not the erasure of the fear memory but the develop- disorders may themselves diminish sleep quality, there is ment of a new safety or “extinction memory” that inhibits the growing evidence that sleep disorders can aggravate, trigger, fear memory and its associated emotional response. and even cause a range of neuropsychiatric conditions. In this issue, Straus et al. (3 ) report that total sleep Moreover, as has been shown in major depression and deprivation can impair the retention of such extinction mem- attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, treating sleep can ories. In their study, healthy human participants in three improve symptoms, suggesting that disrupted sleep contri- groups successfully learned to associate a blue circle (condi- butes to the clinical syndrome and is an appropriate target for tioned stimulus) with the occurrence of an electric shock treatment. In addition to its effects on symptoms, sleep (unconditioned stimulus) during a fear acquisition session. disturbance, which is known to impair emotional regulation The following day, during extinction learning, the blue circle and cognition in otherwise healthy individuals, may contribute was repeatedly presented without the shock. The day after to or cause disabling cognitive deficits. For sleep to be a target that, extinction recall was tested by again repeatedly present- for treatment of symptoms and cognitive deficits in neurop- ing the blue circle without the shock.
    [Show full text]
  • The Amygdala, Fear and Reconsolidation
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences 140 The Amygdala, Fear and Reconsolidation Neural and Behavioral Effects of Retrieval-Extinction in Fear Conditioning and Spider Phobia JOHANNES BJÖRKSTRAND ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1652-9030 ISBN 978-91-554-9863-4 UPPSALA urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-317866 2017 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Gunnar Johansson salen, Blåsenhus, von Kraemers allé 1A, Uppsala, Friday, 12 May 2017 at 13:00 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Emily Holmes (Karolinska institutet, Institutionen för klinisk neurovetenskap; University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry). Abstract Björkstrand, J. 2017. The Amygdala, Fear and Reconsolidation. Neural and Behavioral Effects of Retrieval-Extinction in Fear Conditioning and Spider Phobia. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences 140. 72 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-554-9863-4. The amygdala is crucially involved in the acquisition and retention of fear memories. Experimental research on fear conditioning has shown that memory retrieval shortly followed by pharmacological manipulations or extinction, thereby interfering with memory reconsolidation, decreases later fear expression. Fear memory reconsolidation depends on synaptic plasticity in the amygdala, which has been demonstrated in rodents using both pharmacological manipulations and retrieval-extinction procedures. The retrieval-extinction procedure decreases fear expression also in humans, but the underlying neural mechanism have not been studied. Interfering with reconsolidation is held to alter the original fear memory representation, resulting in long-term reductions in fear responses, and might therefore be used in the treatment of anxiety disorders, but few studies have directly investigated this question.
    [Show full text]
  • Noradrenergic Blockade Stabilizes Prefrontal Activity and Enables Fear
    Noradrenergic blockade stabilizes prefrontal activity PNAS PLUS and enables fear extinction under stress Paul J. Fitzgeralda,1, Thomas F. Giustinoa,b,1, Jocelyn R. Seemanna,b,1, and Stephen Marena,b,2 aDepartment of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843; and bInstitute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 Edited by Bruce S. McEwen, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, and approved June 1, 2015 (received for review January 12, 2015) Stress-induced impairments in extinction learning are believed to preferentially involved in fear extinction (32–34). Stress-induced sustain posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Noradrenergic sig- alterations in the balance of neuronal activity in PL and IL as a naling may contribute to extinction impairments by modulating consequence of noradrenergic hyperarousal might therefore con- medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) circuits involved in fear regula- tribute to extinction impairments and the maintenance of PTSD. tion. Here we demonstrate that aversive fear conditioning rapidly To address this question, we combine in vivo microelectrode re- and persistently alters spontaneous single-unit activity in the cording in freely moving rats with behavioral and pharmacological prelimbic and infralimbic subdivisions of the mPFC in behaving manipulations to determine whether β-noradrenergic receptors rats. These conditioning-induced changes in mPFC firing were mediate stress-induced alterations in mPFC neuronal activity. mitigated by systemic administration of propranolol (10 mg/kg, Further, we examine whether systemic propranolol treatment, i.p.), a β-noradrenergic receptor antagonist. Moreover, proprano- given immediately after an aversive experience, rescues stress- lol administration dampened the stress-induced impairment in ex- induced impairments in fear extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Fear Memory Requires Two Stages of Protein Synthesis in Mice
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Communication Social Fear Memory Requires Two Stages of Protein Synthesis in Mice Johannes Kornhuber 1 and Iulia Zoicas 1,2,* 1 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; [email protected] 2 Department of Behavioural and Molecular Neurobiology, University of Regensburg, 93040 Regensburg, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-9131-85-46005 Received: 10 June 2020; Accepted: 1 August 2020; Published: 2 August 2020 Abstract: It is well known that long-term consolidation of newly acquired information, including information related to social fear, require de novo protein synthesis. However, the temporal dynamics of protein synthesis during the consolidation of social fear memories is unclear. To address this question, mice received a single systemic injection with the protein synthesis inhibitor, anisomycin, at different time-points before or after social fear conditioning (SFC), and memory was assessed 24 h later. We showed that anisomycin impaired the consolidation of social fear memories in a time-point-dependent manner. Mice that received anisomycin 20 min before, immediately after, 6 h, or 8 h after SFC showed reduced expression of social fear, indicating impaired social fear memory, whereas anisomycin caused no effects when administered 4 h after SFC. These results suggest that consolidation of social fear memories requires two stages of protein synthesis: (1) an initial stage starting during or immediately after SFC, and (2) a second stage starting around 6 h after SFC and lasting for at least 5 h. Keywords: social fear; social anxiety; anisomycin; protein synthesis; social investigation; fear learning; fear acquisition; fear extinction; fear memory; memory consolidation 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in a Model of Traumatic Stress: Fear Inhibition Or Contextual Processing?
    Downloaded from learnmem.cshlp.org on October 4, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Research The ventromedial prefrontal cortex in a model of traumatic stress: fear inhibition or contextual processing? Zachary T. Pennington,1 Austin S. Anderson,1 and Michael S. Fanselow1,2 1Department of Psychology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA; 2Brain Research Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) has consistently appeared altered in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Although the vmPFC is thought to support the extinction of learned fear responses, several findings support a broader role for this structure in the regulation of fear. To further characterize the relationship between vmPFC dysfunction and responses to traumatic stress, we examined the effects of pretraining vmPFC lesions on trauma reactivity and enhanced fear learning in a rodent model of PTSD. In Experiment 1, lesions did not produce differences in shock reactivity during an acute traumatic episode, nor did they alter the strength of the traumatic memory. However, when lesioned animals were subsequently given a single mild aversive stimulus in a novel context, they showed a blunting of the enhanced fear response to this context seen in traumatized animals. In order to address this counterintuitive finding, Experiment 2 assessed whether lesions also attenuated fear responses to discrete tone cues. Enhanced fear for discrete cues following trauma was preserved in lesioned animals, indicating that the deficit observed in Experiment 1 is limited to contextual stimuli. These findings further support the notion that the vmPFC contributes to the regulation of fear through its influence on context learning and contrasts the prevailing view that the vmPFC directly inhibits fear.
    [Show full text]
  • NEUROBIOLOGY of PAVLOVIAN FEAR CONDITIONING Stephen
    P1: FQP April 4, 2001 18:39 Annual Reviews AR121-29 Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2001. 24:897–931 Copyright c 2001 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved NEUROBIOLOGY OF PAVLOVIAN FEAR CONDITIONING Stephen Maren Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1109; e-mail: [email protected] Key Words learning, memory, amygdala, hippocampus, synaptic plasticity ■ Abstract Learning the relationships between aversive events and the environmen- tal stimuli that predict such events is essential to the survival of organisms throughout the animal kingdom. Pavlovian fear conditioning is an exemplar of this form of learning that is exhibited by both rats and humans. Recent years have seen an incredible surge in interest in the neurobiology of fear conditioning. Neural circuits underlying fear con- ditioning have been mapped, synaptic plasticity in these circuits has been identified, and biochemical and genetic manipulations are beginning to unravel the molecular machinery responsible for the storage of fear memories. These advances represent an important step in understanding the neural substrates of a rapidly acquired and adaptive form of associative learning and memory in mammals. INTRODUCTION To sum up, we may legitimately claim the study of the formation and properties of conditioned reflexes as a special department of physiology. I. P. Pavlov, 1927 Seventy-five years ago, Ivan Petrovich Pavlov advocated the physiological anal- ysis of the simple form of associative learning that carries his name: Pavlovian or classical conditioning (Pavlov 1927). If Pavlov were alive today, he would most certainly be impressed with the amazing progress we have made in delineating the brain circuits and neuronal mechanisms underlying Pavlovian conditioning in a variety of behavioral systems and species (Holland & Gallagher 1999, Krasne & Glanzman 1995, Thompson & Krupa 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Fear Conditioning Fear Conditioning in C57BL/6J Male Mice Using
    Stanford Behavioral and Functional Neuroscience Lab Fear Conditioning in C57BL/6J Male Mice using Scopolamine Title: Procedure Fear Conditioning Stanford Behavioral and Functional Neuroscience Lab Fear Conditioning Fear Conditioning (FC) is a type of associative learning task in which mice learn to associate a particular neutral Conditional Stimulus (CS; often a tone) with an aversive Unconditional Stimulus (US; often a mild electrical foot shock) and show a Conditional Response (CR; often as freezing). After repeated pairings of CS and US, the animal learns to fear both the tone and training context. FC is learned rapidly, and after one conditioning session, a very stable and long-lasting behavioral change is produced which is useful for neurobehavioral, genetic, and pharmacological studies. In Trace FC the CS and the US are separated by a certain time interval. It has been shown that the frontotemporal amygdala has an important role in both acquisition and expression of conditional fear and that the hippocampus is necessary for contextual and trace FC. Two different contexts, Context A and B, are used in FC. In the first day, the subjects are placed in Context A, and after 3 min, they receive five tone-shock pairings. The shock (0.5 mA, 2 sec) is delivered 18 sec after the end of the tone (75dB, 2 kHz, 20 sec). An empty trace interval interposes between the tone and the shock in each CS-US pairing. In the second day, mice are placed in Context B (new olfactive cue, floor texture, and visual cues) for 3 min and subsequently given three tone presentations without any shocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Functions of SK Channels in Central Neurons
    Proceedings of the Australian Physiological Society (2007) 38: 25-34 http://www.aups.org.au/Proceedings/38/25-34 ©E.S.L. Faber 2007 Functions of SK channels in central neurons E.S. Louise Faber and Pankaj Sah Queensland Brain Institute,University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia Summary only share significant homology with voltage-gated potassium channels in the pore region3 (Figure 1b). SK 1. SK channels are small conductance calcium- channels lack an obvious calcium-binding domain and their activated potassium channels that are widely expressed in calcium sensitivity is conferred by calmodulin, which is neurons. The traditional viewofthe functional role of SK constitutively bound to the C terminus of the channel and channels is in mediating one component of the causes channel opening upon binding of calcium.9-11 afterhyperpolarisation that follows action potentials. In situ hybridisation3,12,13 and Calcium influx via voltage-gated calcium channels active immunohistochemistry14,15 have shown that SK channels during action potentials opens SK channels and the are widely expressed throughout the central nervous resultant hyperpolarisation lowers the firing frequencyof system. SK1 and SK2 subunits are expressed at their action potentials in manyneurons. highest density in the hippocampus and cortex, whereas 2. Recent advances have shown that in addition to SK3 subunits are expressed at their highest levels in regions controlling action potential firing frequency, SKchannels such as the hypothalamus, thalamus and midbrain. When are also important in regulating dendritic excitability, expressed as homomultimers,3 SK channel subunits form synaptic transmission and synaptic plasticity. ion channels that have functional characteristics typical of 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Basolateral Amygdala Regulation of Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis
    Molecular Psychiatry (2012) 17, 527–536 & 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1359-4184/12 www.nature.com/mp ORIGINAL ARTICLE Basolateral amygdala regulation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis and fear-related activation of newborn neurons ED Kirby1, AR Friedman2, D Covarrubias3, C Ying2, WG Sun2, KA Goosens4, RM Sapolsky5 and D Kaufer1,2 1Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA; 2Department of Integrative Biology, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA; 3Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA; 4McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA and 5Department of Biological Sciences, Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA Impaired regulation of emotional memory is a feature of several affective disorders, including depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder. Such regulation occurs, in part, by interactions between the hippocampus and the basolateral amygdala (BLA). Recent studies have indicated that within the adult hippocampus, newborn neurons may contribute to support emotional memory, and that regulation of hippocampal neurogenesis is implicated in depressive disorders. How emotional information affects newborn neurons in adults is not clear. Given the role of the BLA in hippocampus-dependent emotional memory, we investigated whether hippocampal neurogenesis was sensitive to emotional stimuli from the BLA. We show that BLA lesions suppress adult neurogenesis, while lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala do not. Similarly, we show that reducing BLA activity through viral vector-mediated overexpression of an outwardly rectifying potassium channel suppresses neurogenesis. We also show that BLA lesions prevent selective activation of immature newborn neurons in response to a fear-conditioning task.
    [Show full text]
  • Fear Conditioning in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Evidence for Delayed Extinction of Autonomic, Experiential, and Behavioural Responses
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Behaviour Research and Therapy 45 (2007) 2019–2033 www.elsevier.com/locate/brat Fear conditioning in posttraumatic stress disorder: Evidence for delayed extinction of autonomic, experiential, and behavioural responses Jens BlechertÃ, Tanja Michael, Noortje Vriends, Ju¨rgen Margraf, Frank H. Wilhelm Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute for Psychology, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 60/62, CH-4055 Basel, Switzerland Received 29 August 2006; received in revised form 26 February 2007; accepted 28 February 2007 Abstract Aversive conditioning has been proposed as an important factor involved in the etiology of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, it is not yet fully understood exactly which learning mechanisms are characteristic for PTSD. PTSD patients (n ¼ 36), and healthy individuals with and without trauma exposure (TE group, n ¼ 21; nTE group, n ¼ 34), underwent a differential fear conditioning experiment consisting of habituation, acquisition, and extinction phases. An electrical stimulus served as the unconditioned stimulus (US), and two neutral pictures as conditioned stimuli (CSþ, paired; CSÀ, unpaired). Conditioned responses were quantified by skin conductance responses (SCRs), subjective ratings of CS valence and US-expectancy, and a behavioural test. In contrast to the nTE group, PTSD patients showed delayed extinction of SCRs to the CSþ. Online ratings of valence and US-expectancy as well as the behavioural test confirmed this pattern. These findings point to a deficit in extinction learning and highlight the role of affective valence appraisals and cognitive biases in PTSD. In addition, there was some evidence that a subgroup of PTSD patients had difficulties in learning the CS–US contingency, thereby providing preliminary evidence of reduced discrimination learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Exposure Therapy for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Factors of Limited Success and Possible Alternative Treatment
    brain sciences Opinion Exposure Therapy for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Factors of Limited Success and Possible Alternative Treatment Sara Markowitz and Michael Fanselow * Psychology Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +310-206-3891 Received: 13 February 2020; Accepted: 10 March 2020; Published: 13 March 2020 Abstract: Recent research indicates that there is mixed success in using exposure therapies on patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Our study argues that there are two major reasons for this: The first is that there are nonassociative aspects of PTSD, such as hyperactive amygdala activity, that cannot be attenuated using the exposure therapy; The second is that exposure therapy is conceptualized from the theoretical framework of Pavlovian fear extinction, which we know is heavily context dependent. Thus, reducing fear response in a therapist’s office does not guarantee reduced response in other situations. This study also discusses work relating to the role of the hippocampus in context encoding, and how these findings can be beneficial for improving exposure therapies. Keywords: post-traumatic stress disorder; exposure therapy; fear extinction; nonassociative 1. Introduction Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental disorder affecting up to 9% of the US population [1]. It can best be described as a heightened arousal response after experiencing an extremely stressful event or trauma. Distress due to and avoidance of reminders of the trauma are common, as are negative alterations in mood [2]. It is theorized that PTSD is strongly related to fear learning and conditioned fear, and therefore, fear conditioning is often used as a model in anxiety-related studies [3].
    [Show full text]