272-2177 Tfully .Ubmitted: ~" Thompson

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

272-2177 Tfully .Ubmitted: ~ ) 151991 '- * SUBSURFACE \ RELIMINARY ASSESSMENc^SSMENTT ERA PROJECT 190043 Prepared For LEHMAN SUNOCO B* EARTH RESOURCE ASSOCIA* 335 South Eighth Street Lebanon, Pennsylvania 1.. (717) 272-2177 tfully .ubmitted: Respec ~" Thompso8 P n* * Geologist 0043.RPT fage rfl INTRODUCTION In respons n Octobea , 199o t e17 r 0 lette re Pennsylvani th fro f o m a Department of Environmental Resources (DER) an assessment of hydrocarbon contamination associated with leakag unleadef eo d gasoline fro a formem r underground storage tank (UST thein )o r propertn i y Lehman, Pennsylvania, Lehman Sunoco contracted Earth Resource Associates, Inc. (ERA). The following report has been prepared by ERA n behalo , f Lehmao f n Sunoco o present , l findinge al t th f o s required assessment. Specifically addressed by the report are: o Background information including site locatiod an n setting; soils; geology; hydrogeology; circumstances concernin e discoverth ge th f o y leaking UST; and, a review of available information concerning a prior hydrocarbon release at a former gasoline station located on an adjacent property. o Procedures use instalo t d networa l eighf k) ^p (8 t shallow gr,QUndwate.fvi^monJ.^o^jing^^oints 4#*° *A« unconsolj_dated 'aqtjife d procedurean r s useo t d collect groundwater samples from these points. o Procedures used to collect groundwater samples from the existing, on-site leak detection monitoring wells whic beed hha n previously installe Lehman di n both the old UST field and the new UST field* EARTH RESOURCE ASSOCIATES, INC, HRI00002 )43,RPT Procedures use colleco dt t groundwater samples from Lehman Sunoco 's on -site bedrock drinking vater suppl frod yan m fj^yJs.^(S) "nearby bedrock domestic: drinking water supply wells. o Procedures use colleco t d surfacta e water sample fro a smalm l pond located east-southease th f o t ^ Sunoco Station. o Analytical resultl surfacal groundwated f o san e r samples collected. ' SITE LOCATION AND SETTING -*, I'Lehman Sunoco operates a gasoline service station and garage on an .{approximately i-acre site, alon soute gth h sid Statf eo en i Rout 8 e11 * .. ' ... rthe Tow f Lehmanno , Lehman Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania - • » -" * H> properte $ (FigurTh . situates 1) ei y "thet da " head "6"f *smala l northeast '•OilS^aa^trending valley, which vas artificially backfilled prior to i^ - , u constructio statioe th f 1959n o ni . Becaus topographie th f eo c relief of the area, the fill area drops off quickly in the form of steep embankment n botso e eas th ht 'and sout he stationsideth f o s , before merging wit naturale hth , gentl moderatelyo yt , eastward sloping land surface. Elevations range from approximately 1,300 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) in the vicinity of the station to approximately 1,275 EARTH RESOURCE' ASSOCIATES, INC. G R0000I 3 043.RPT Page #4 ;et AMSL in the vicinity of the small pond and wetland area located ,. >proximately 500 feet east of the station. Surface Drainage 3 the site is situated immediately eaat-of- a .majorrregiohal^aurface" ater drainage. divJLde_i surface drainage from the property is in an easterl nortlieastlo t y y direction, with most flow dischargina o gt ;etland area and snail pond. This wetland area forms the headwaters of in unnamed tributary to The Huntsville Reservoir. Flow from the reservoir is southeast to Huntsville Creek, which flows into Toby Creek» which in. turn flows into the Susquehanna River just south of Kingston, PA. 0 Cultural Setting The Lehman Sunoco site is situated in a rural- village setting, with much of the surrounding area consisting of farmland, open undeveloped [land, forested land, private residences , and small commercial J facilities. To the North, the site is bordered by several small 1 commercial and residential properties, one of which used to be a Sinclair- gasoline service station; to the East, the isite^ia bordered ,-• ^t-t* ...-..-..-. 'primaril undevelopey yb d scrub-shrub fores wetlandsd tan Wese th t , o ;t 7 the site is bordered by residential properties; . and to the South, by 7 open grass covered fields* residential properties, and forested land. i .. f - 5 . T I 5 - , ft EARTH RESOURCEI ASSOCIATESn 0 0 n I O ,» INC. )43.RPT Procedures use colleco dt t tfroundvater samples from V Lehman Sunoc s oon-sit' e bedrock drinking water suppl frod yan m JfiX£,.f,5J "nearby T bedrock\domcstic: drinking water supply wells. o Procedures use colleco t d a surfact e water sample fro snaia m l pond located east-southease th f o t Sunoc' o Station. o Analytical resultl surfacal d £roundwatef o san e r samples collected. SITE LOCATIO D SETTINNAN L G t - '. - • - • : • i••Lehma: n Sunoco operates a gasoline service station and garage on an japproximately |-acre site, along the south side of State Route 118 in fthI e Town of Lehman, Lehman Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania ) (Figure 1). The property is situated at the" head "o'f"a. small northeast " ' ' •-••:- valley, which was artificially backfilled prior to 'constructio statioe th f n1959o n n i * Becaus topographie th f eo c relief . : •'"•'•• - : -•I ' of the area, the fill area drops off quickly in the form of steep embankments on both the east and south sides of the station, before merging wit naturale hth , gentl o moderatelyt y , eastward sloping land surface. Elevations range from^approximately 1,300 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) in the vicinity'of the station to approximately 1,275 EARTH RESOURCE'ASSOCIATES! INC. RRI 00005 90043.RPT Pag5 #1 e the earth's surface. The matrix material containing the coarse rock fragments usually ranges from clayey to sandy; however, overall textur dependens i e t upopercentage nth coarsf eo e fragmentsa s a d ,an result n rangca i e from claye o stonyt y n thiI .s portio f Luzerno n e County equal amounts of clay, silt, and sand normally comprise the matrix* The color of Olean till is strongly dependent on local bedroc rangn k ca typ ed ean fro m yellowis h5/6R Y brow reddiso )0 t (1 n h R 4/4)browY 5 .( n Lateral differences base n coloro d , matrix composition, and pebble content are also common (Growl and Sevon, r 1980). In additio tilo t n l deposits, other type unconsolidatef so d sediments whicaree exisy th ahma n i tinclud e various sand, mixture gravelf so , pts*t, clad alluviayan l deposits. Bedrock Geology Bedrock underlying the Lehman Sunoco site has been mapped by the f Pennsylvania Topographi d Geologian c c Surve * the^Deyorii'aa y n aged c*,*iyAL^.Fprmation (Figure 3) (Hollowell and Koester, 1975) * The Catskill Formatio complea s ni x unit consistin darf go k grayiso t d hre reddish brown shale, claystone siltstoned ,an ; greenish gradard yan k grayish red, fine to medium "grained sandstone; and yellowish to . •*-*•.•*•"*•••«••———..- ". ———^•^.__———«.- - • - •• **..!. I greenish gray* medium to coarse grained sandstone and conglomerate. it. ? Small amounts of grayish brown calcareous conglomerate and greenish gray conglomeritic mudston n alsca eo occur. Siltstone predominates within the lower portion of the Catskill clastic suite and quartz is tne predominant minera thin i l s formation e rocTh k. colo d graian r n EARTH RESOURCE ASSOCIATES, INC. ARIQ0006 lunlley Mtn. Formotion BBS i•JTTP^^f?^^ * ' ' *- «™KIKKK " Formation BS — LEHMAN SUKOCO Hydrocarbon Contamination Assessment *• L<hmon. R Mapping R.productd Fron Tht ^yc^ PrtUnlnary Gfologic Quadranpif PtnnsyUan.f -o » Harv.y'a- _ _ 5 Lak. Quad __ ::__-i 1 Isiik [SCAL -"-i E1 - RRI00007 90043.RP . T Pag7 #1 e size alternate frequentl a typica n i y l e sectioCatakilth d an s ni l believed to be approximately 8,000 feet thick. Both the thickness and the abundance of red beds decrease in a westward direction (Hollowell and Koester, 1975)* Sedimentary features common in the sandstone and conglomerate units include crossbedding, channeling, and cut and fill features, with fossils also common. The shale portion of the Catskill Formation disintegrates rapidly when exposed to moisture, weathering to small, platy, triangular fragments; while the sandstone, siltstone, and conglomerate units are moderately resistant to weathering and weather to medium and large-sized blocks* The mantle created by weathering is thickes n glaciatei t df variablo area d an s e thickness elsewhere. Surface drainage is moderate to good for unglaciated portions of the Catskill and poor in glaciated regions (Geyer and Wilshusen, 1982). Bedding in the Catskill Formation is generally non-distinct in the shale, claystone, and siltstone units, but is well developed in the sandston conglomeratd ean e units. Bedding thickness ranges from less than one foot in the finer-grained units to between 10 and 16 feet in the coarser-grained units. Bedrock Structure • * The trend"(strike) of bedr.ock in-this. region generally ranges between N.40'E. and N.50*E. and the (inclination) dip of these bedrock units range s degree5 e 2 southeasbetwee th d o an t s 1 nnorthwestr to e .Th . -ike of the bedrock was measured by ERA on an outcrop adjacent to the site and found to range from N;.39aE..; to^N.SS'E; The dip of the EARTH RESOURCE ASSOCIATES, INC. ARIQQQQfl 90043 T .RP Pag8 #1 e • • " rocd _i k expose y thib d s outcro s e shallowfounb pwa o t d , ranging from 9* to 12* to the northwest. Based on these measurements, it appears as e situate b e northwes e sity th ith f ma e n o d t flana smal f o kl anticlinal form. ' , ; . Rupture deformation has produced joints, faults, and certain types of cleavage in all rock units of the Catskill Formation; however, joints are the most common type of fracture observed in this formation.
Recommended publications
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • PA Trout Spring 2019
    Spring 2019 Publication of the Pa. Council of Trout Unlimited www.patrout.org Coldwater Heritage Partnership distributes $75,000 in grants The Coldwater Heritage Partnership has announced that more than $75,000 in grants have been awarded to local organi- zations to protect and conserve Pennsyl- vania’s coldwater streams. Grant funds for the Coldwater Heritage Partnership are provided by Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Community Conservation Partnerships Program Environmental Stewardship Fund, the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, the Foundation for Pennsylvania Watersheds and Pennsylva- nia Trout Unlimited. Kelly Williams Photo The purpose of the CHP is to provide Fishery surveys revealed that native brook trout are present in many areas of the Potts Run watershed. Once AMD restoration activities are complete, these popula- leadership, coordination, technical assis- tions should be able to expand as they utilize restored habitat. tance, and funding support for the conser- vation and protection of Pennsylvania’s coldwater streams. The program awards Perseverance pays off in See , page 5 GRANTS the Potts Run watershed Annual PATU By Rachel Kester find a stream that had at least a few tolerant TU Project Coordinator macroinvertebrate species present despite award nominations the AMD influences. As a college intern at the Clearfield I remember thinking that if any streams due by July 31 County Conservation District, I first sam- in the Clearfield Creek watershed could Pennsylvania Council of Trout Unlim- pled Potts Run in the summer of 2002 as be restored, Potts Run was one of them. ited will present its annual awards during part of an assessment of Clearfield Creek, a It had relatively good water quality, intact the fall meeting at the Shavers Creek Fire- tributary to the West Branch Susquehanna habitat, and at least some aquatic life.
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion and Sediment Control Plans Narrative Atlantic Sunrise Project
    An Employee-Owned Company Erosion and Sediment Control Plans Narrative Atlantic Sunrise Project Phase 2 North Diamond Regulator Station Lehman Township Luzerne County Pennsylvania Prepared For: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC 2800 Post Oak Blvd Houston, TX, 77251 Issued: August 2015 Revised: October 2016 BL Project No. 14C4909 Prepared By: BL Companies 4242 Carlisle Pike, Suite 260 Camp Hill, PA 17011 Alaric J Busher, PE P.E. 60320 4242 Carlisle Pike, Suite 260 ▪ Camp Hill, PA 17011 ▪ T (717) 651-9850 ▪ F (717) 651-9858 ▪ www.blcompanies.com BL Companies Pennsylvania, Inc. ° Michael A. Lozanoff, PE ° Rainer A. Muhlbauer, AIA ° Stanley C. Novak, PE An Employee-Owned Company CONTENTS Part Description Page 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION .................................................................................. 1 1.1 Topographic Features USGS Site Location Map ........................................................................... 2 Aerial Location Map ................................................................................... 3 1.2 Soil Characteristics .................................................................................... 4 1.3 Earth Disturbance Activity .......................................................................... 6 1.4 Project Site Runoff ..................................................................................... 8 1.5 Surface Water Classification ...................................................................... 8 1.6 BMP Description Narrative ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Toby Creek Coldwater Conservation Plan
    Upper Toby Creek Coldwater Conservation Plan Photo Credit: Dr. Joseph Simons, III- Wild Brown Trout caught on Toby Creek Prepared and written by Robert “Bobby” E. Hughes, EPCAMR Executive Director & North Atlantic Aquatic Connectivity Collaborative (NAACC) Lead 1 Coordinator Technical Assistance, Mapping, Monitoring, Assessment, & Sampling Conducted by: EPCAMR Staff Michael A. Hewitt, Program Manager Shawnese Taylor, GIS Watershed Outreach Specialist & NAACC Lead Observer Steve Cornia, GIS Watershed Outreach Specialist & NAACC Lead Observer Laura Rinehimer, Environmental Education/Outreach Specialist & NAACC Lead Observer Denise Hernandez, Urban Environmental Education & Outreach Specialist Rachael Grube, GIS Watershed Outreach Specialist & NAACC Lead Observer Gavin Pellitteri, GIS Watershed Outreach Specialist & NAACC Lead Observer Gabby Zawacki, GIS Watershed Outreach Specialist & NAACC Lead 1 Coordinator Conal Herron, Watershed Outreach & Education Specialist Intern & NAACC Lead Observer Lauren Elizabeth Perry, Watershed Outreach & Education Specialist Intern, SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry-Environmental Resources Engineering & NAACC Lead Observer Jessica Britten, Watershed Outreach & Education Specialist Intern- King’s College & NAACC Lead Observer Sean Banul, Watershed Outreach & Education Specialist Intern- The Pennsylvania State University, Wilkes-Barre Campus & NAACC Lead Observer Jason Zubris-Watershed Outreach & Education Specialist Intern- The Pennsylvania State University, Main Campus-State College & NAACC
    [Show full text]
  • November 6, 2004 (Pages 6007-6118)
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 34 (2004) Repository 11-6-2004 November 6, 2004 (Pages 6007-6118) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2004 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "November 6, 2004 (Pages 6007-6118)" (2004). Volume 34 (2004). 45. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2004/45 This November is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 34 (2004) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 34 Number 45 Saturday, November 6, 2004 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 6007—6118 Agencies in this issue: The Courts Department of Agriculture Department of Community and Economic Development Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Department of Education Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Department of Transportation Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Liquor Control Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Philadelphia Regional Port Authority Public School Employees’ Retirement Board State Board of Nursing Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 360, November 2004 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publication and effectiveness of Com- monwealth Documents).
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Plan Guide for Small Projects in Luzerne County
    Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Plan Guide For Small Projects in Luzerne County Conditions for use of this guide: • Total earth disturbance must be 0.5 acres or less to qualify. • Submissions not including a complete package (pages 1-17 of this document plus the District’s 2-page E&SCP Plan Review Application) will not be reviewed. • The District may request more detailed plans (i.e. engineered E&SPC plans), based on scope of earthwork being proposed. • Please include your municipal stormwater management permit application when submitting this guide to the District. 325 Smiths Pond Road Shavertown, PA 18708 570-674-7991 (phone) 570-674-7989 (fax) [email protected] www.luzernecd.org Rev. 9/2017 Introduction All earth disturbance activities in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania are regulated by the requirements of the erosion and sediment pollution control regulations found in Title 25, Chapter 102 of the Pennsylvania Code. All earth disturbance activities, including those that disturb less than 5,000 square feet, must implement and maintain Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control erosion and sediment pollution. A written Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control (E&SPC) Plan is required if one or more of the following apply: the total area of disturbance is 5,000 square feet or greater, or if the activity has the potential to discharge to a water classified as a High Quality (HQ) or Exceptional Value (EV) water published in Chapter 93 regulations (relating to water quality standards). This document is intended to assist in the development of an E&SPC Plan where the total area of earth disturbance is 5,000 square feet or greater and less than 21,780 square feet (half an acre) on slopes that are less than 10%.
    [Show full text]
  • NPDES) INDIVIDUAL PERMIT to DISCHARGE STORMWATER from SMALL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS (Ms4s
    3800-PM-BCW0200e Rev. 8/2019 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Permit DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) INDIVIDUAL PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER FROM SMALL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS (MS4s) NPDES PERMIT NO. PAI132282 In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. Section 1251 et seq. (“the Act”) and Pennsylvania’s Clean Streams Law, as amended, 35 P.S. Section 691.1 et seq., Luzerne County 20 North River Street Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711 is authorized to discharge from a regulated small municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) located in Plains Township, Luzerne County to Unnamed Tributary to Huntsville Creek (CWF, MF), Unnamed Tributary to Sutton Creek (CWF, MF), Culver Creek (CWF, MF), Marsh Creek (CWF, MF), Roaring Brook (CWF, MF), Unnamed Tributary to Hunlock Creek (CWF, MF), Unnamed Tributary to Nescopeck Creek (CWF, MF), East Fork Harveys Creek (CWF, MF), Huntsville Creek (CWF, MF), Unnamed Tributary to East Fork Harveys Creek (CWF, MF), Balliet Run (HQ-CWF (existing use)), Unnamed Tributary of Nescopeck Creek (CWF, MF), Unnamed Tributary to Little Nescopeck Creek (CWF, MF), Black Ash Creek (CWF, MF), Unnamed Tributary to Balliet Run (HQ-CWF (existing use)), Unnamed Tributary to Big Wapwallopen Creek (CWF, MF), and Unnamed Tributary to Toby Creek in Watershed(s) 5-D, 4-G, 5-B, and 5-C in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth herein. THIS PERMIT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 1, 2020 THIS PERMIT SHALL EXPIRE AT MIDNIGHT ON MAY 31, 2025 The authority granted by coverage under this Permit is subject to the following further qualifications: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • State Council Adopts Policy on Trout Management
    Winter 2019 Publication of the Pa. Council of Trout Unlimited www.patrout.org Comment now to sustain protection of clean water By Rob Shane TU Mid-Atlantic Organizer Clean water starts at the source. Thanks to the 2015 Clean Water Rule, the wetlands and intermittent streams that provide this clean water to our favorite fisheries are protected from short-sighted, thoughtless development. At the end of 2018, however, the EPA proposed revisions of this rule that would dismantle many years of scientific data, ignore overwhelming public support, Brad Isles Photo and defy common sense. PATU strongly favors conservation programs and projects that preserve or en- The proposed Waters of the United hance existing populations of wild trout. States rule would strip Clean Water Act See WATER, page 7 State Council adopts Submit comments to the EPA: http://standup.tu.org/ Policy on Trout Management stand-up-for-clean-water Periodically, PA Council reviews its 49 local chapters representing over 14,000 various policies to incorporate updates members. Our mission is, “To conserve, Keystone/TUTeens that reflect current views on these guiding protect, restore, and sustain Pennsylvania’s Conservation Camp principles. The following Policy on Trout coldwater fisheries and their watersheds, Management prepared by the Trout Man- especially our wild trout resources.” registration opens agement Committee was approved and Both PATU and its parent organization, Registration for the Keystone/TUTeens adopted by Council’s Executive Committee National Trout Unlimited, believe that Conservation Camp is now open and can on Feb. 9, 2019. conservation should be a true partnership be completed at www.flyfishingsummer- Trout Unlimited was founded as a between landowners, agencies, municipali- camp.org.
    [Show full text]
  • HUNTSVILLE CREEK COLDWATER CONSERVATION PLAN Including the Lower Toby Creek Watershed
    Looking upstream on Huntsville Creek below The Lands at Hillside Farms HUNTSVILLE CREEK COLDWATER CONSERVATION PLAN Including the Lower Toby Creek Watershed Prepared by: Technical Assistance, Mapping, Monitoring, Assessment, & Sampling Conducted by: EPCAMR Staff Robert “Bobby” E. Hughes, Executive Director & NAACC Lead 1 Coordinator Michael A. Hewitt, Program Manager, GISP Shawnese Taylor, GIS Watershed Outreach Specialist & NAACC Lead Observer Steve Cornia, GIS Watershed Outreach Specialist & NAACC Lead Observer Gavin Pellitteri, GIS Watershed Outreach Specialist (former employee) Rachel A. Grube, GIS Watershed Outreach Specialist (former employee) Laura Rinehimer, Environmental Education/Outreach Specialist & NAACC Lead Observer Denise Hernandez, Urban Environmental Education & Outreach Specialist Levi Sunday-Lefkowitz, EPCAMR Summer Watershed Outreach Specialist Intern-University of Rochester, NY & NAACC Lead Observer Sean Michael Asher Banul, EPCAMR Summer Watershed Outreach Specialist Intern- The Pennsylvania State University student & NAACC Lead Observer Jessica Britten, King’s College-EPCAMR Summer Watershed Outreach Specialist Intern & NAACC Lead Observer Lauren Elizabeth Perry, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, NY- EPCAMR Summer Watershed Outreach Specialist Intern & NAACC Lead Observer EPCAMR Volunteers Marissa Loftus, Kutztown University student, seasonal EPCAMR Summer Watershed Outreach Specialist Intern, & NAACC Lead Observer Jason Zubris, The Pennsylvania State University student, EPCAMR Volunteer, & NAACC
    [Show full text]
  • Muddy Creek Watershed Restoration Initiative
    MUDDY CREEK WATERSHED RESTORATION INITIATIVE Feasibility Report and Restoration Plan for The Muddy Creek Watershed Burke and McDowell Counties, North Carolina Catawba River Basin Sediment plume from Muddy Creek enters Catawba River. December, 2003 Feasibility Report and Restoration Plan for the Muddy Creek Watershed McDowell and Burke Counties, NC Catawba River Basin Table of Contents Executive Summary i List of Tables and Figures iii Chapter 1: Introduction to the Muddy Creek Watershed and the Muddy 1 Creek Watershed Restoration Partners Introduction 1 A. Project Goals and Objectives 2 B. Economic Benefits of Watershed Conservation 3 C. Ecological Benefits of Watershed Conservation 6 Chapter 2: The Feasibility of a Restored Muddy Creek Watershed 8 A. Goal 1: Establish Trout Fishery on Catawba River Tailrace 8 B. Goal 2: Fully Supporting Uses for All Waterbodies in Muddy Creek 8 Watershed C. Program Success 11 Chapter 3: Results from the Watershed Assessment 13 A. Biological Condition of the Muddy Creek Watershed 13 B. Chemical Condition of the Muddy Creek Watershed 14 C. Physical Condition of the Muddy Creek Watershed 15 Chapter 4: Conservation Priorities 22 A. Stream Restoration 22 B. Riparian Reforestation 25 C. Livestock Exclusion 26 D. Riparian Forest Preservation 27 Chapter 5: Conclusions and Recommendations 31 References Cited R-1 Appendix A: Maps of Muddy Creek Watershed A-1 Muddy Creek Watershed Restoration Plan Muddy Creek Restoration Partners Executive Summary The Muddy Creek watershed is impaired. Fish and benthic macroinvertebrate data from the NC Division of Water Quality, NC Wildlife Resources Commission, and Duke Energy Corporation all indicate “fair” to “good-fair” water quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover and Annual Report Form
    3800-FM-BPNPSM0491 Rev. 4/2014 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA MS4 Annual/Progress Report DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF POINT AND NON-POINT SOURCE MANAGEMENT MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) ANNUAL/PROGRESS REPORT For the Reporting Period: 1/01/15 to 12/30/15 Annual Report Progress Report Due Date: 12/30/15 New Permittee Renewal Permittee GENERAL INFORMATION Permittee Name: Dallas Township NPDES Permit No.: PAPAI132232 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 518 Effective Date: 05/01/14 City, State, Zip: Dallas, Pa 18612 Expiration Date: 4/30/19 MS4 Contact Person: Ryan Doughton Renewal Due Date: 10/01/18 Title: Township Eng. Rep. Admin. Extended? Yes No Phone: 570-287-3178 Municipality: Dallas Township Email: [email protected] County: Luzerne Co-Permittees (if applicable): n/a WATER QUALITY INFORMATION Are there any discharges to waters within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed? Yes No Identify all surface waters that receive stormwater discharges from storm sewers within the MS4 urbanized area and provide the requested information (see instructions). Receiving Water Name Ch. 93 Class. Impaired? Cause(s) TMDL? WLA? Abrahams Creek CWF, MF No n/a N n/a Huntsville Creek CWF, MF No n/a N n/a Leonard Creek HQ, CWF, MF No n/a N n/a Sutton Creek CWF, MF No n/a N n/a Toby Creek CWF, MF No n/a N n/a Trout Creek CWF, MF No n/a N n/a Identify any Wasteload Allocations (WLAs) identified in TMDLs for the MS4, if applicable. Identify the pollutant(s) and mass load(s)): n/a - 1 - 3800-FM-BPNPSM0491 Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality of Water
    Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 108. Series L, Quality of Tater, 7 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIEECTOE QUALITY OF WATER IN THE BY MARSHALL ORA LEIGHTON WITH AN INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER ON PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES BY GEORGE BUELL HOLLISTER WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PBINTING OFFICE 1904 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittal-......._-._..-..____.___. .....-.-_-____---.--.------ 7 Physiographic features of Susquehanna basin, by G. B. Hollister ........... 9 Allegheny Plateati _____ ________._____.___________.-_--__----_--_---- 11 Allegheny Mountain region _____ ___.__-.________________---.--_.--_- 13 Allegheny Valley________---_-----______...--------.-_--.------------ 14 Piedmont Plateau ...............................^.................... 15 Summary of slopes, ---.-___---____,_____. ________.____-_-------._---- 16 Popnlation and indtistrial development in New York ...................... 18 Character of surface waters--_.-_---_____.______._-_..----------.-------- 21 Susquehanna River in New York_____ __ -__.____,-_______---_------- 21 Stisquehamia River above northern anthracite coal basin _._.......... 22 Susquehanna River in northern anthracite coal basin .................. 23 Sewage pollution. -_____.______...__--___._.______.___....______- .. 23 Coal-mine waste-_------_.--_-___ .____---_-__._-__---------__---- 24 Culm waste-____-.---._.---_____________._____-------.-... ....--- 26 Effect of mine wastes ______.__..._._._._._............--..--.-.-- 27 Important ingredients and their variation
    [Show full text]