HANA ROSS, Phd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HANA ROSS, Phd HANA ROSS, PhD. MARCH 2015 Tobacconomics is a collaboration of leading researchers Melinda Gates Foundation and the African Capacity Building who have been studying the economics of tobacco control Foundation. The aim of this project is to expand current policy for nearly 30 years. The team is dedicated to helping research efforts in the economics of tobacco control and to researchers, advocates and policymakers access the latest enhance the knowledge of economic and tax issues among and best research about what’s working—or not working— tobacco control advocates and policymakers to strengthen to curb tobacco consumption and the impact it has on support for tobacco tax and price increases in sub-Saharan our economy. As a program of the University of Illinois at Africa. Visit www.tobaccoecon.org. Chicago, Tobacconomics is not affiliated with any tobacco manufacturer. Visit www.tobacconomics.org or follow us on Ross H (2015). Understanding and measuring tax avoidance Twitter www.twitter.com/tobacconomics. and evasion: A methodological guide. Prepared for the The Economics of Tobacco Control Project is hosted Economics of Tobacco Control Project¸ School of Economics, by the South African Labour and Development Research University of Cape Town and Tobacconomics, Health Policy Unit at the School of Economics, University of Cape Town Center, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University in partnership with the American Cancer Society, the Bill & of Illinois at Chicago. Acknowledgements The author would like to thank the following individuals for their assistance in reviewing drafts of this document: Johanna Birckmayer, PhD, MPH, Frank Chaloupka, PhD, Grieve Chelwa, PhD, David Merriman, PhD, and Guillermo Paraje, PhD. The guide is available at: http://tobaccoecon.org/publications/reports/ http://tobacconomics.org/research/ Design by Parrilla Design Workshop MARCH 2015 Contents Executive Summary 2 Introduction 4 Definitions 5 Chapter 1: Theory of Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion and Its Impact 7 1.1 Overview 1.2 Theory of Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion 1.3 Impact of Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion Chapter 2: How to Measure the Scope of Tax Avoidance and Evasion 12 2.1 Survey of Tobacco Users 2.2 Examination of Cigarette Packs 2.3 Compare Tobacco Sales and Consumption (gap analysis) 2.4 Econometric Modeling 2.5 Other Methods 2.6 Summary and Recommendations for Estimating the Scope of Tax Avoidance and/or Evasion Chapter 3: Assessing the Quality of the Estimates 32 Conclusions and Summary 47 References 48 -1- illegally econometric transported modeling consumption full-taxExecutive Summary tobacco tax paid sales This Methodological Guide updates and expands the It concludes that tax avoidance/evasion may reduce, monitoring smuggling 13-year old World Bank Toolkit on how to estimate the but do not eliminate the effectiveness of tobacco tax low-tax tobacco tax scopeExecutive of tobacco smuggling. It draws Summary on the results of increases in reducing tobacco use and raising revenues. numerous empirical studies that tested the applicability The motivation for a government to address tax trade evasion illicit trade of five methods described in the Toolkit while critically avoidance/evasion is directly linked to the size of the evaluating new methods that emerged in response to revenue loss while the effectiveness of the interventions thethis evolving methodological nature of illicit tobacco trade, the policy dependsthe definitions on the level of enforcement. The level of guidedebates surrounding the issue, and the development of sectionenforcement is directly linked to the level of investment new technologies. to combat tax evasion/avoidance. updates and expands the 13-year-old World Bank begins by defining key variables. It explains the ThisToolkit guide on howcovers to notestimate only smugglingthe scope ofof tobacco tobacco difference between “smuggling”, “illicit trade”, products,smuggling. but It drawsalso tax on evasion the results related of numerous to illicit tobacco the“tax evasion” second and “tax chapteravoidance”, and is describes central to the tradeempirical and studieslegal tax that avoidance, tested the since applicability the methods to behaviorsGuide and that describes constitute eleven either methods tax evasion of measuring or tax estimatesof five methods these phenomena described in are the often Toolkit intertwined. while It avoidance.the scope of Tobacco tax avoidance products and that tax avoid/evade evasion: surveys all or ofa alsocritically provides evaluating guidance new on methods how to assessthat emerged the quality in portiontobacco ofusers, the requiredexamination taxes of are cigarette defined packs as “low-tax” obtained ofresponse existing to estimates, the evolving including nature thoseof illicit offered tobacco by the products,from smokers, while examination the rest of tobacco of discarded products cigarette fall into tobaccotrade, the industry. policy debates Unlike surroundingthe World Bank the Toolkit, issue, this thepacks, category examination of “full-tax” of cigarette products. packs obtained from guideand the does development not cover theof new topic technologies. of how to reduce tax retail, comparison of sales with consumption (Gap avoidance and tax evasion and instead refers the reader Analysis), econometric modeling, comparison of tax This guide covers not only smuggling of tobacco paid sales with estimated consumption, comparison products,to the WHO but FCTC also tax Protocol evasion torelated Eliminate to illicit Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products. of actualthe and firstprojected tobacco tax revenue, key tobacco trade and legal tax avoidance, since the informant interviews, monitoring tobacco trade, and methods to estimates these phenomena are often 1analyzingchapter seizures of illegally transported tobacco. theintertwined. definitions It also provides guidance section on how beginsto Thelays thechapter theoretical begins foundation with a brief for overview the methods of the andmain byassess defining the quality key variables. of existing It estimates,explains the including difference principlesdescribes theof conductingimpact of tax research, avoidance which and are tax applicable evasion betweenthose offered “smuggling”, by the tobacco “illicit trade”,industry. “tax Unlike evasion” the and toon allthe methods. supply of Then and demandthe Guide for provides tobacco a products, step-by-step “taxWorld avoidance”, Bank Toolkit, and this describes guide doesbehaviors not cover that constitute descriptionon tax revenue, of the on specifics the price ofelasticity each the of demand,method, starting eitherthe topic tax ofevasion how to or reduce tax avoidance. tax avoidance Tobacco and products tax withand onthose the mostaffordability frequently of discussedtobacco products. in the literature, thatevasion avoid/evade and instead all orrefers a portion the reader of the to required the WHO taxes followedWe provide by insightapproaches into thethat economic, are unique social, to certain areFCTC defined Protocol as “low-tax” to Eliminate products, Illicit Tradewhile thein rest of marketand political conditions determinants and approaches of tax avoidance suffering and from tobaccoTobacco products Products. fall into the category of “full-tax” multipletax evasion, weaknesses. including Each factors method such ashas price/tax a background products. sectiondifferences, that linksthe tax it tostructure, theory, athe list costsof pros of andobtaining cons, andlow-tax a recommendation products, the costs when of aovercoming particular methodlegal shouldand regulatory be used. obstacles, The application informal of distributioneach method is the first chapter lays the theoretical demonstratednetworks, and bythe examples. level of corruption. This chapter foundation for the methods and describes the impact demonstrates how tax avoidance and tax evasion of tax avoidance and tax evasion on the supply of and impactThe chapter average concludes cigarette that prices, there the is pricenot a elasticitysingle method demand for tobacco products, on tax revenue, on the ofthat tobacco will produce demand, a definitive brand proliferation, estimate, becauseand other all of price elasticity of demand, and on the affordability of tobaccothem have control advantages policies. and disadvantages. Since the tobacco products. We provide insight into the economic, weakness of a particular approach can be exacerbated social, and political determinants of tax avoidance byThis specific chapter marketconcludes conditions, that tax it avoidance/evasion is important to use and tax evasion, including factors such as price/tax localmay reduce,specific but knowledge do not eliminate, and creativity the effectiveness when applying differences, the tax structure, the costs of obtaining theseof tobacco methods. tax increases Given the in complexity reducing tobacco of tobacco use taxand low-tax products, the costs of overcoming legal and avoidanceraising revenues. and evasion The motivation and the methods’ for a government limitations, to it regulatory obstacles, informal distribution networks, isaddress important tax avoidance/evasion to triangulate the isestimates directly oflinked the scopeto the and the level of corruption. This chapter demonstrates ofsize the of problemthe revenue using loss different while the methods.effectiveness Many ofstudies the how tax avoidance and tax evasion impact average applyinterventions the same depends method on over the time level in of order enforcement. to capture cigarette
Recommended publications
  • Project SUN: a Study of the Illicit Cigarette Market In
    Project SUN A study of the illicit cigarette market in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland 2017 Results Executive Summary kpmg.com/uk Important notice • This presentation of Project SUN key findings (the ‘Report’) has been prepared by KPMG LLP the UK member firm (“KPMG”) for the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies (RUSI), described in this Important Notice and in this Report as ‘the Beneficiary’, on the basis set out in a private contract dated 27 April 2018 agreed separately by KPMG LLP with the Beneficiary (the ‘Contract’). • Included in the report are a number of insight boxes which are written by RUSI, as well as insights included in the text. The fieldwork and analysis undertaken and views expressed in these boxes are RUSI’s views alone and not part of KPMG’s analysis. These appear in the Foreword on page 5, the Executive Summary on page 6, on pages 11, 12, 13 and 16. • Nothing in this Report constitutes legal advice. Information sources, the scope of our work, and scope and source limitations, are set out in the Appendices to this Report. The scope of our review of the contraband and counterfeit segments of the tobacco market within the 28 EU Member States, Switzerland and Norway was fixed by agreement with the Beneficiary and is set out in the Appendices. • We have satisfied ourselves, so far as possible, that the information presented in this Report is consistent with our information sources but we have not sought to establish the reliability of the information sources by reference to other evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2003 Agency Financial Report
    Report on Performance and Accountability Table of Contents 4 Management Discussion & Analysis 5 Secretary’s Message 8 Mission, Vision and Organization 9 Executive Summary 24 Annual Performance Report 25 Strategic Goal 1: A Prepared Workforce 27 Outcome Goal 1.1 – Increase Employment, Earnings, and Assistance 49 Outcome Goal 1.2 – Increase the Number of Youth Making A Successful Transition to Work 61 Outcome Goal 1.3 – Improve the Effectiveness of Information and Analysis On The U.S. Economy 69 Strategic Goal 2: A Secure Workforce 71 Outcome Goal 2.1 – Increase Compliance With Worker Protection Laws 81 Outcome Goal 2.2 – Protect Worker Benefits 99 Outcome Goal 2.3 – Increase Employment and Earnings for Retrained Workers 107 Strategic Goal 3: Quality Workplaces 109 Outcome Goal 3.1 – Reduce Workplace Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities 127 Outcome Goal 3.2 – Foster Equal Opportunity Workplaces 135 Outcome Goal 3.3 – Reduce Exploitation of Child Labor and Address Core International Labor Standards Issues 143 Departmental Management Goals 145 Outcome Goal HR – Establish DOL as a Model Workplace 153 Outcome Goal PR – Improve Procurement Management 158 Outcome Goal FM – Enhance Financial Performance through Improved Accountability 163 Outcome Goal IT – Provide Better and More Secure Service to Citizens, Businesses, Government, and DOL Employees to Improve Mission Performance 168 Financial Performance Report 169 Chief Financial Officer’s Letter 171 Management of DOL’s Financial Resources 171 Chief Financial Officers Act (CFOA) 172 Inspector General
    [Show full text]
  • Current Population Survey, July 2018: Tobacco Use Supplement File That Becomes Available After the File Is Released
    CURRENT POPULATION SURVEY, July 2018 Tobacco Use Supplement FILE Version 2, Revised September 2020 TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION CPS—18 This file documentation consists of the following materials: Attachment 1 Abstract Attachment 2 Overview - Current Population Survey Attachment 3a Overview – July 2018 Tobacco Use Supplement Attachment 3b Overview-Tobacco Use Supplement NCI Data Harmonization Project Attachment 4 Glossary Attachment 5 How to Use the Record Layout Attachment 6 Basic CPS Record Layout Attachment 7 Current Population Survey, July 2018 Tobacco Use Supplement Record Layout Attachment 8 Current Population Survey, July 2018 Tobacco Use Supplement Questionnaire Attachment 9 Industry Classification Codes Attachment 10 Occupation Classification Codes Attachment 11 Specific Metropolitan Identifiers Attachment 12 Topcoding of Usual Hourly Earnings Attachment 13 Tallies of Unweighted Counts Attachment 14 Countries and Areas of the World Attachment 15 Allocation Flags Attachment 16 Source and Accuracy of the July 2018 Tobacco Use Supplement Data Attachment 17 User Notes NOTE Questions about accompanying documentation should be directed to Center for New Media and Promotions Division, Promotions Branch, Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C. 20233. Phone: (301) 763-4400. Questions about the CD-ROM should be directed to The Customer Service Center, Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C. 20233. Phone: (301) 763-INFO (4636). Questions about the design, data collection, and CPS-specific subject matter should be directed to Tim Marshall, Demographic Surveys Division, Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C. 20233. Phone: (301) 763-3806. Questions about the TUS subject matter should be directed to the National Cancer Institute’s Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Behavior Research Program at [email protected] ABSTRACT The National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • July 16, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION and HAND DELIVERY Division of Dockets Management Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishe
    Jose Luis Murillo Vice President Regulatory Affairs July 16, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION AND HAND DELIVERY Division of Dockets Management Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 Re: Docket No. FDA-2017-N-6189 (83 Fed. Reg. 11,818, March 16, 2018) Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Tobacco Product Standard for Nicotine Level of Certain Tobacco Products Altria Client Services (“ALCS”), on behalf of Philip Morris USA Inc. (“PM USA”), John Middleton Company (“JMC”), and Sherman Group Holdings LLC and its subsidiaries (“Nat Sherman”),1 submits these comments to the Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA’s” or the “Agency’s”) Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“ANPRM”) on a Tobacco Product Standard for Nicotine Level of Certain Tobacco Products. The ANPRM comes within the context of an industry in the midst of transformative change. Cigarette smoking is at historically low levels and continues to decline. At the same time, a new market is emerging in innovative noncombustible tobacco products that are potentially less harmful than cigarettes. There is now a scientific consensus that noncombustible products, like e-vapor, are substantially less risky than conventional cigarettes. It is smoke, and not nicotine, that causes most tobacco- related harm. And adult smokers are increasingly expressing interest in switching from cigarettes to less risky alternatives. We agree that a nicotine product standard of some sort may make sense in a future regulatory system, but this requires the pre-existence of a marketplace with alternative, FDA-authorized, reduced risk products; more information about the relative risks of those products; and a regulatory system that respects the rights of adults to make decisions based on accurate information.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa Directory of Certified Tobacco Product Manufacturers and Brands PLEASE NOTE Flavored Cigarettes & RYO Are Now Illegal
    Iowa Directory of Certified Tobacco Product Manufacturers and Brands PLEASE NOTE Flavored Cigarettes & RYO are now illegal. Regardless of being on this List. See footnote *(3) 8/12/20 Iowa Additions to the Directory (within the last six months) PM Philip Morris USA Nat's cigarettes 8/12/20 PM Liggett Group Inc. Montego cigarettes 6/8/20 Deletions to the Directory (within the last six months) PM Sherman 1400 Broadway NYC, Ltd. Nat's cigarettes 8/12/20 PM Japan Tobacco International Wings cigarettes 5/7/20 PM King Maker Marketing Ace cigarettes 5/7/20 PM King Maker Marketing Gold Crest cigarettes 5/7/20 PM Kretek International Dreams cigarettes 5/7/20 Type of Manufacturer is for Participating (PM) or Non-Participating (NPM) with the Master Settlement Agreement. TYPE MANUFACTURER BRAND PRODUCT DATE NPM Cheyenne International, LLC Aura cigarettes 8/4/10 NPM Cheyenne International, LLC Cheyenne cigarettes 2/1/05 NPM Cheyenne International, LLC Decade cigarettes 2/1/05 PM Commonwealth Brands Inc Crowns cigarettes 5/31/11 PM Commonwealth Brands Inc Montclair cigarettes 7/22/03 PM Commonwealth Brands Inc Sonoma cigarettes 7/22/03 PM Commonwealth Brands Inc USA Gold cigarettes 7/22/03 PM Farmers Tobacco Company of Cynthiana, Inc. Baron American Blend cigarettes 9/20/05 PM Farmers Tobacco Company of Cynthiana, Inc. Kentucky's Best cigarettes 7/22/03 PM Farmers Tobacco Company of Cynthiana, Inc. Kentucky's Best roll your own 1/4/08 PM Farmers Tobacco Company of Cynthiana, Inc. VB - Made in the USA cigarettes 9/20/05 PM ITG Brands, LLC Fortuna cigarettes 12/21/18 PM ITG Brands, LLC Kool cigarettes 6/12/15 PM ITG Brands, LLC Maverick cigarettes 6/12/15 PM ITG Brands, LLC Rave cigarettes 12/12/14 PM ITG Brands, LLC Salem cigarettes 6/12/15 PM ITG Brands, LLC Winston cigarettes 6/12/15 PM Japan Tobacco International Export 'A' cigarettes 5/24/12 PM Japan Tobacco International LD cigarettes 2/22/17 PM Japan Tobacco International Wave cigarettes 7/22/03 PM King Maker Marketing Wildhorse cigarettes 12/13/18 NPM KT&G Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Interventions for Preventing Smoking in Young People (Review)
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Community interventions for preventing smoking in young people (Review) Carson KV, Brinn MP, Labiszewski NA, Esterman AJ, Chang AB, Smith BJ Carson KV, Brinn MP, Labiszewski NA, Esterman AJ, Chang AB, Smith BJ. Community interventions for preventing smoking in young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD001291. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001291.pub2. www.cochranelibrary.com Community interventions for preventing smoking in young people (Review) Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS HEADER....................................... 1 ABSTRACT ...................................... 1 PLAINLANGUAGESUMMARY . 2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR THE MAIN COMPARISON . ..... 3 BACKGROUND .................................... 5 OBJECTIVES ..................................... 5 METHODS ...................................... 5 RESULTS....................................... 8 Figure1. ..................................... 9 Figure2. ..................................... 13 DISCUSSION ..................................... 17 AUTHORS’CONCLUSIONS . 19 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 20 REFERENCES ..................................... 20 CHARACTERISTICSOFSTUDIES . 27 DATAANDANALYSES. 98 Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Reported tobacco use, Outcome 1 Smoking - Daily. 100 Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Reported tobacco use, Outcome 2 Smoking-weekly. 101 Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Reported tobacco use, Outcome 3 Smoking - monthly. 102 Analysis 1.4. Comparison
    [Show full text]
  • Standardised Packaging of Cigarettes and Tobacco Products Smokefree Action Coalition Briefing
    Standardised Packaging of Cigarettes and Tobacco Products Smokefree Action Coalition briefing Children and Families Bill: House of Lords Report Stage The Smokefree Action Coalition (SFAC) is an alliance of over 250 organisations committed to promoting public health. This briefing note for MPs and peers sets out the case for legislation requiring cigarettes and other tobacco products to be sold in standardised (sometimes called “plain”) packaging. The first two pages summarise the key arguments, set out in full in the more detailed briefing that follows. The Smokefree Action Coalition supports the Government’s amendment to the Bill (No 57B: New Clause before Clause 80). This has essentially the same effect as the cross-Party and crossbench amendment previously tabled by Lord Faulkner, Baroness Finlay, Lord McColl and Baroness Tyler, which will now not be pressed to a vote. Contacts: Deborah Arnott, Chief Executive, ASH [email protected] 020 7404 0242, 07976 935987 (m) Laura Williams, Senior Public Affairs Manager, Cancer Research UK [email protected] 020 3469 8499, 07918 677168 (m) What is Standardised Packaging? 1. Standardised packaging would remove the attractive promotional aspects of existing tobacco packaging, and require that the appearance of all tobacco packs would be uniform, including the colour of the pack. Standardised packaging would also allow the promotion of strong anti-smoking and health messages. 2. In April 2012, the UK Government launched a consultation on whether to introduce standardised packaging, following a commitment in its Tobacco Control Plan for England.1 On Friday 12th July 2013 the Government announced in a written ministerial statement that it had 1 | Page “decided to wait until the emerging impact of the decision in Australia can be measured before we make a final decision on this policy in England”.
    [Show full text]
  • North Dakota Office of State Tax Commissioner Tobacco Directory List of Participating Manufacturers (Listing by Brand) As of May 24, 2019
    North Dakota Office of State Tax Commissioner Tobacco Directory List of Participating Manufacturers (Listing by Brand) As of May 24, 2019 **RYO: Roll-Your-Own Brand Name Manufacturer 1839 U.S. Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers, Inc. 1839 RYO U.S. Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers, Inc. 1st Class U.S. Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers, Inc. American Bison RYO Wind River Tobacco Company, LLC Amsterdam Shag RYO Peter Stokkebye Tobaksfabrik A/S Ashford RYO Von Eicken Group Bali Shag RYO Commonwealth Brands, Inc. Baron American Blend Farmer’s Tobacco Co of Cynthiana, Inc. Basic Philip Morris USA, Inc. Benson & Hedges Philip Morris USA, Inc. Black & Gold Sherman’s 1400 Broadway NYC, LLC Bo Browning RYO Top Tobacco, LP Bugler RYO Scandinavian Tobacco Group Lane Limited Bull Brand RYO Von Eicken Group Cambridge Philip Morris USA, Inc. Camel R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Camel Wides R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Canoe RYO Wind River Tobacco Company, LLC Capri R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Carlton R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company CF Straight Virginia RYO Von Eicken Group Charles Fairmon RYO Von Eicken Group Chesterfield Philip Morris USA, Inc. Chunghwa Konci G & D Management Group (USA) Inc. Cigarettellos Sherman’s 1400 Broadway NYC, LLC Classic Sherman’s 1400 Broadway NYC, LLC Classic Canadian RYO Top Tobacco, LP Commander Philip Morris USA, Inc. Crowns Commonwealth Brands Inc. Custom Blends RYO Wind River Tobacco Company, LLC Brand Name Manufacturer Danish Export RYO Peter Stokkebye Tobaksfabrik A/S Dark Fired Shag RYO Von Eicken Group Dave’s Philip Morris USA, Inc. Davidoff Commonwealth Brands, Inc. Djarum P.T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Illegal Cigarette Trade
    Published in: Mangai Natarajan (ed.), International Criminal Justice, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 148-154 The Illegal Cigarette Trade Klaus von Lampe Introduction The smuggling and illegal distribution of cigarettes is a global phenomenon in a dual sense. It can be observed in some form or other on every continent, and there are some schemes that span the globe, connecting distant places such as a clandestine factory in China producing counterfeit cigarettes with a street corner in London where these cigarettes are eventually sold to consumers. Cigarettes are essentially a legal good. What makes the trade in cigarettes illegal is the evasion of excise and customs duties. Excise duties are taxes levied on certain goods produced or sold within the country. Customs duties are charged on goods imported from another country. Cigarettes are among the highest taxed commodities and provide a significant source of revenue for governments. While the level of taxation varies across jurisdictions, in many countries taxes account for as much as 70 to 80 percent of the price smokers have to pay for a pack at a legal retail outlet store. Through a number of different schemes, suppliers and customers circumvent the taxation of cigarettes. As a result, cigarettes are being made available at a cost below legal retail prices, providing both lucrative profits for suppliers and significant savings for consumers, while causing substantial losses of revenue to governments, estimated at around forty billion USD globally in 2007, and at the same time undermining public health policies that aim to discourage smokers through high tobacco taxation (Joossens et al., 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Wzwbopyugkcmn5l7v Aiog.Pdf
    Testimony before the Minnesota House Committee on Taxes Regarding Increasing the Tax on Tobacco and Vapor Products Lindsey Stroud, Policy Analyst Taxpayers Protection Alliance February 18, 2021 Chairwoman Marquat and Members of the Committee, Thank you for your time today to discuss the issue of increasing the state excise tax on tobacco and vapor products. My name is Lindsey Stroud and I am a Policy Analyst with the Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA). TPA is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to educating the public through the research, analysis and dissemination of information on the government’s effects on the economy. As the nation continues to deal with the economic impact of COVID-19, many lawmakers are considering increasing excise taxes on tobacco and vapor products. Although, excise tax increases on such products do result in an immediate surge in revenue, sin taxes are unreliable and decrease over time. Further, lawmakers should refrain from increasing taxes on tobacco harm reduction products – including heat-not-burn and electronic cigarettes and vapor products – as such products are significantly less harmful than combustible cigarettes and have helped millions of American adults quit smoking. Tobacco and Vapor Product Use Among Minnesota Youth The most recent data on youth e-cigarette use in Minnesota comes from the 2019 Minnesota Student Survey (MSS).1 In 2019, according to the MSS, 89 percent of 8th graders, 84 percent of 9th graders and 74 percent of 11th graders reported not using an e-cigarette or vapor product in the 30 days prior to the survey. Further, only 7 percent of 11th graders, 2 percent of 9th graders, and 1 percent of 8th graders reported daily e-cigarette use.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Gouvernementaux Canada 1 1 RETURN BIDS TO: Title - Sujet RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: CSTADS Bid Receiving - PWGSC / Réception Des Solicitation No
    Public Works and Government Services Travaux publics et Services Canada gouvernementaux Canada 1 1 RETURN BIDS TO: Title - Sujet RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: CSTADS Bid Receiving - PWGSC / Réception des Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Date soumissions - TPSGC H4133-122931/A 2013-07-17 11 Laurier St. / 11, rue Laurier Client Reference No. - N° de référence du client Place du Portage , Phase III H4133-122931 Core 0A1 / Noyau 0A1 GETS Reference No. - N° de référence de SEAG Gatineau, Québec K1A 0S5 PW-$$SS-071-26261 Bid Fax: (819) 997-9776 File No. - N° de dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME 071ss.H4133-122931 Solicitation Closes - L'invitation prend fin Time Zone Fuseau horaire at - à 02:00 PM Eastern Daylight Saving REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL on - le 2013-08-19 Time EDT DEMANDE DE PROPOSITION F.O.B. - F.A.B. Proposal To: Public Works and Government Services Canada Plant-Usine: Destination: Other-Autre: We hereby offer to sell to Her Majesty the Queen in right Address Enquiries to: - Adresser toutes questions à: Buyer Id - Id de l'acheteur of Canada, in accordance with the terms and conditions Pageau, Francois 006sq set out herein, referred to herein or attached hereto, the Telephone No. - N° de téléphone FAX No. - N° de FAX goods, services, and construction listed herein and on any (819) 956-3563 ( ) (819) 956-7994 attached sheets at the price(s) set out therefor. Destination - of Goods, Services, and Construction: Proposition aux: Travaux Publics et Services Destination - des biens, services et construction: Gouvernementaux Canada Nous offrons par la présente de vendre à Sa Majesté la Reine du chef du Canada, aux conditions énoncées ou Specified Herein incluses par référence dans la présente et aux annexes Précisé dans les présentes ci-jointes, les biens, services et construction énumérés ici sur toute feuille ci-annexée, au(x) prix indiqué(s).
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH DAKOTA TOBACCO CONTROL STATE PLAN 2020-2025 SOUTH DAKOTA 600 East Capitol Avenue | Pierre, SD 57501 P605.773.3361 F605.773.5683 DEPARTMENT of HEALTH
    SOUTH DAKOTA TOBACCO CONTROL STATE PLAN 2020-2025 SOUTH DAKOTA 600 East Capitol Avenue | Pierre, SD 57501 P605.773.3361 F605.773.5683 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Office of the Secretary March 2020 Dear Fellow South Dakotans: Tobacco use remains the single most preventable cause of disease and death in the United States and in South Dakota. Of all deaths in South Dakota in 2018, 18.8% were in part caused by tobacco use, including 17.7% of all heart disease deaths and 29% of cancer deaths. The South Dakota Department of Health and its partners are pleased to present the 2020-2025 Tobacco Control State Plan. The plan was developed in collaboration with Tobacco Control Program staff, key partners and stakeholders. The 2016 Surgeon General’s report, E-cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults called youth use of e-cigarettes an epidemic, and data from the 2019 National Youth Tobacco Survey shows 1 in 4 high school students use e-cigarettes. While cigarette use rates among high school students are at an all-time low, the rise in e-cigarettes has brought overall tobacco product use up. The South Dakota Tobacco Control Program is dedicated to decreasing e-cigarette use among youth in South Dakota and will act to protect our young people from all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes. Smoking cessation improves health status and enhances quality of life. The 2020 Surgeon General’s report, Smoking Cessation: A Report of the Surgeon General, found that smoking cessation, at any age, is beneficial. Smoking places a substantial financial burden on smokers, healthcare systems, and society.
    [Show full text]