Urban Renewal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Urban Renewal VICTORIA 197 4-75 TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING BOARD OF VICTORIA THIRTIETH ANNUAL REPORT FINANCIAL YEAR 1974-1975 PRESENTED TO BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION S (2) OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1961 By Authority: No. 79.-11166/75.-PRICB $1.00 C. H. RIXON, GOVERNMENT PRINTER. MELBOURNE. Contents 5 The year in review 7 Legislation 8 Delegation of the Board's powers and functions 9 State Planning Council 12 AlburyjWodonga 14 Melton and Sunbury 18 Urban renewal 20 Strategic planning 20 Investigation and designated area studies 21 Regional planning 23 Co-operative activities with Commonwealth Government agencies 24 Statements of planning policy 26 Other studies 27 Statutory planning 27 Planning schemes being prepared by the Board 30 Planning schemes approved 31 Melbourne Metropolitan planning area 32 Interim development orders 32 Permits 32 Revocations 33 Committees 36 Promotion of planning 38 Planning and Privacy 42 Board members and staff 43 Appendices THIRTIETH ANNUAL REPORT 235 Queen Street, Melbourne, 3000 The Honorable the Minister for Planning, 480 Collins Street, Melbourne, 3000. Sir, In accordance with the prov1s1ons of Section 5 (2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1961, the Board has pleasure in submitting to you for presentation to Parliament the following report on its activities during the twelve months ended 30th June, 1975. The Year in Review This has been yet another important year for planning in Victoria. New concepts introduced last year changed the scope and direction of planning considerably involving the Board in a greater range of activities. The recent involvement of the Commonwealth Government in urban and regional planning has continued. The first joint planning project in which the Governments of Victoria and the Commonwealth were involved was the commitment, together with the New South Wales Government, to the development of a new city in the AI bury JWodonga area. The initial agreement was signed in January, 1973, and the Board has been heavily involved in the subsequent periods. In addition to the AI bury JWodonga project, the Board has been engaged directly and indirectly in wide ranging activities with Commonwealth agencies principally the Cities Commission and the Department of Urban and Regional Development. A second major factor contributing to the increased depth and scope of planning was the passage of the Development Areas Act 1973. In the first four months of its operation, three designated and thirteen investigation areas were declared. For each investigation area, the Board is required to prepare a report within the period specified by the Governor in Council, such period being not longer than one year. The declared areas are largely within the planning areas of the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works, the Western Port Regional Planning Authority and the Geelong Regional Planning Authority. The Board employed a consulting firm to undertake the necessary studies and prepare the Board's reports under the surveillance of a steering committee appointed by the Board. Reports on twelve of the areas were released during this year. As a result of the findings of the Melton and Sunbury Investigation Area studies, Melton and Sun bury were declared Designated Areas for the purposes of accelerated growth and their selection as satellite cities was reaffirmed. The Board has consequently been heavily involved in the early development prior to the establishment of a development corporation. In addition to this new work, the Board has continued with its State-wide strategic studies. The State Planning Council, its Advisory Committee and Co-ordinating Groups met regularly, a statement of planning policy for Central Gippsland (Brown Coal Deposits) was approved, those on Western Port and Mornington Peninsula were the subject of review and others are in course of preparation. The Board was also involved in reporting on urban renewal proposals pursuant to the Urban Renewal Act 1970. 6 Regional planning studies continued. There is a regional planning authority in the Loddon-Campaspe region and a provisional committee in East Gippsland. The Board provides supportive services for both. Investigations are currently taking place in the Yarra Valley jDandenongs and Central Gippsland regions. The Board believes it should promote the early establishment of regional planning authorities and has sought staff and finance for this purpose. An increasing volume of statutory planning was executed. Planning schemes were approved for Phillip Island, City of Benalla, Shire of Colac (Colac Environs) and Shire of Maffra (Heyfield Township). Twenty-one interim development orders were approved, one to be administered by the Board and the balance by councils. Seven councils and a development corporation resolved to prepare schemes for all or part of their areas. In the metropolitan area, following the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works' Report on Concept Objections to Amendment Nos. 3 and 21 and its review last year by the Board, processing and adoption of parts of these amendments has begun. Several other amendments to the Melbourne Metropolitan Planning Scheme were approved and others are being processed. Work in the preparation of the Board's own schemes advanced well. The hearings of objections to the Maldon scheme and the Wangaratta Sub-Regional scheme were completed, the schemes for Lake Cairn Curran and Lake Glenmaggie and Wangaratta Sub-Regional were exhibited and the Lorne scheme is approaching that stage. Significant steps continue to be taken in the planning of the Gippsland Lakes with the refinement of interim development controls. A considerable amount of work has been involved in the adminstration of the Board's interim development order over the Ovens-Upper Murray area, within which the new growth complex of AI bury fWodonga will be developed. The committee established to advise the Board on the preservation of places of historic interest met as required and the Board's representation on various other committees was maintained. Board members and staff continued with their promotion of planning: visiting many areas to discuss and explain to councils and the public the advantages of plan.ning ; assisting municipalities contemplating planning control or preparing interim development orders or planning schemes and maintaining liaison with regional planning authorities and the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works. A growing awareness of the importance of planning has been reflected in the increasing number of requests for speakers, articles, project material and general information. The Chairman, Deputy Chairman and senior officers have been invited to speak at many conferences and seminars in the metropolitan area and country centres, and to prepare articles for publication in various journals. The Board's programme of publishing material and conducting seminars to stimulate interest and develop an understanding of planning has continued and for the first time a display was staged at the Royal Agricultural Show. The staff continued to carry out their duties with efficiency and enthusiasm despite the increasing work load which all officers have been called upon to bear. Although the Board benefited by several staff Increases during the year, the additions were inadequate to enable the Board to discharge its responsibilities as fully as it would wish. The Board believes that staff, equipment and financial resources must be provided to meet the continuing and increasing planning commitment within the State otherwise important work must be deferred or set aside. 7 Legislation Cluster Titles Act 1974 (No. 8661} The Cluster Titles Act was passed by Parliament in December, 1974 and is to be proclaimed during the second half of 1975. This Act is a significant piece of legislation and is likely to have a profound effect on housing development in Victoria in the future. A committee comprising planners, architects, developers and others was formed in 19n to recommend the manner in which cluster development should proceed. The Committee's recommendations have resulted in this Act and also a Model Cluster Code which is a guideline for municipalities administering cluster development. At present, subdivision of land is undertaken in two ways, by conventional sub­ division pursuant to the Local Government Act or in accordance with the Strata Titles Act. The Strata Titles Act was not appropriate for some concepts of group housing because no subdivision could occur until the whole building complex had been completed and insufficient flexibility of siting was available under the Uniform Building Regulations. The Cluster Titles Act has overcome these problems. Cluster development allows the free siting of individual houses, private gardens, public and communal open space and public and private roads to enable the best possible relationship between buildings and open space. The legislation contains amongst other things, the following basic concepts : a cluster subdivision subdivides land into separately owned lots and common property, the addition of common property being the major difference from a conventional subdivision. This concept creates new possibilties for the planning of private roads and open space. duster lots do not have to be contiguous with one another nor need they have a conventional street frontage. the Act will not permit the preparation of a mixed strata and cluster subdivision. because owners of the lots will also own the common property as tenants in common, the owners will
Recommended publications
  • Electronic Gaming Machines Strategy 2015-2020
    Electronic Gaming Machines Strategy 2015-2020 Version: 1.1 Date approved: 22 December 2015 Reviewed: 15 January 2019 Responsible Department: Planning Related policies: Nil 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................. 3 2 Definitions ............................................................................................................. 3 3 Acronyms .............................................................................................................. 5 4 Scope .................................................................................................................... 5 5 Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 5 6 Gambling and EGMs in the City of Casey ........................................................... 6 7 City of Casey Position on Electronic Gaming Machines ................................... 7 7.1 Advocacy & Partnerships ....................................................................................... 7 7.2 Local Economy ....................................................................................................... 8 7.3 Consultation & Information Provision ...................................................................... 9 7.4 Community Wellbeing ............................................................................................ 9 7.5 Planning Assessment ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Engagement Advisory Committees in the Goulburn Broken
    Community Engagement Advisory Groups in the Goulburn Broken Catchment An overview Reviewed November 2011 1 | P a g e “Healthy, resilient and increasingly productive landscapes supporting vibrant communities” www.gbcma.vic.gov.au Vision Healthy, resilient and increasingly productive landscapes supporting vibrant communities Purpose Through its leadership and partnerships the Goulburn Broken CMA will improve the resilience of the Catchment’s people, land, biodiversity and water resources in a rapidly changing environment. Goulburn Broken CMA’s Values and Behaviours Environmental Sustainability - we will passionately contribute to improving the environmental health of our catchment. Safety - we vigorously protect and look out for the safety and wellbeing of ourselves, our colleagues and our workers. Partnerships – we focus on teamwork and collaboration across our organisation to develop strategic alliances with partners and the regional community. Leadership – we have the courage to lead change and accept the responsibility to inspire and deliver positive change. Respect – we embrace diversity and treat everyone with fairness, respect, openness and honesty. Achievement, Excellence and Accountability – we do what we say we will do, we do it well and we take responsibility and accountability for our actions. Continuous learning, innovation and improvement – we are an evidence and science-based organisation and we test and challenge the status quo. We learn from our successes and failures and we are continually adapting using internal and external feedback from stakeholders and the environment. We are an agile, flexible and responsive organisation. 2 | P a g e “Healthy, resilient and increasingly productive landscapes supporting vibrant communities” www.gbcma.vic.gov.au At A Glance What: The Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority (CMA) was established as one of 10 CMAs in 1997 under the Catchment and Land Protection Act (CaLP Act) and covering the State of Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Various Planning Scheme Amendments 8 Dec 2020
    Form 1 Section 38(1) NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO A PLANNING SCHEME TO BE PRESENTED TO PARLIAMENT On 24 November 2020 the Minister approved Amendment No. C222ball to the Ballarat Planning Scheme. The amendment was prepared by Ballarat City Council. The Ballarat City Council will be responsible for administering the scheme. The Amendment applies a Heritage Overlay (HO225) to parts of the former Ballarat Saleyards, 1020 La Trobe Street, Delacombe and makes other consequential changes to the Ballarat Planning Scheme. The Minister did not exempt the planning authority from any of the requirements of sections 17, 18 or 19 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. The Minister did not exempt the planning authority from any of the requirements of the Planning and Environment Regulations 2015. The Minister did not prepare the amendment under section 20A of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. Stuart Menzies Director, State Planning Services Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning For the Minister Date: 07 December 2020 Planning and Environment Regulations 2015 Form 1 Section 38(1) OFFICIAL Form 1 Section 38(1) NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO A PLANNING SCHEME TO BE PRESENTED TO PARLIAMENT On 16 November 2020 the Minister approved Amendment No. C97cola to the Colac Otway Planning Scheme. The amendment was prepared by the Colac Otway Shire Council. The Colac Otway Shire Council will be responsible for administering the scheme. The changes to the scheme are: implementation of the strategic land use directions of the Colac 2050 Growth Plan (2019) by updating the Municipal Planning Strategy, relevant clauses in the Planning Policy Framework, and the schedules to the Operational Provisions 72.08 Background Documents and 74.02 Further Strategic Work.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo Bay Community Capacity Project
    AAPOLLOPOLLO BBAYAY CCOMMUNITYOMMUNITY CCAPACITYAPACITY PPROJECTROJECT ‘Community capacity building: measuring social capital to improve health in Apollo Bay’ FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 2001 Deborah Jennings and Peter McNair Victorian Public Health Training Scheme Charles Gibson and Leanne Madden Performance and Quality Improvement Department of Human Services, Barwon-South Western Region Under the direction of the Apollo Bay Community Consultative Committee AAPOLLOPOLLO BBAYAY CCOMMUNITYOMMUNITY CCAPACITYAPACITY PPROJECTROJECT ‘Community capacity building: measuring social capital to improve health in Apollo Bay’ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FINAL REPORT—DECEMBER 2001 Deborah Jennings and Peter McNair Victorian Public Health Training Scheme Charles Gibson and Leanne Madden Performance and Quality Improvement Department of Human Services, Barwon-South Western Region Under the direction of the Apollo Bay Community Consultative Committee Executive Summary Introduction The Apollo Bay Community Capacity Project (ABCCP) resulted from the keen interest of the Barwon-South West Region of the Department of Human Services (DHS) to explore the measurement of social capital and apply the community capacity building model to improve health outcomes in small rural communities. Strengthening community capacity is considered a method of empowering communities to respond to the compounding effects of infrastructure decline, rapid change and increasing social difficulties. Measuring Social Capital and Health The study has drawn on the range of issues being considered by government and academics with regard to community capacity building as a means to improve health outcomes. Increasingly, there is a strong role for government to support regional initiatives for growth and economic viability. Through access to educational opportunities, skills development, technological capacity, diversification of industry and promotion of rural areas as worthy investment choices, rural areas are able to readjust and be opportunist in the face of change.
    [Show full text]
  • Ÿþm Icrosoft W
    COLAC OTWAY PLANNING SCHEME 22 LOCAL PLANNING POLICIES 18/06/2009 C55 22.01 HERITAGE PLACES AND AREAS 18/06/2009 C55 This policy applies to all places and areas affected by a Heritage Overlay. 22.01-1 Policy Basis 18/06/2009 C55 Throughout Colac Otway are buildings, streetscapes, sites and precincts that represent a significant asset and resource for the Western District of Victoria. Protecting cultural heritage assets is important in maintaining the Shire’s character and sense of place. The Municipal Strategic Statement includes an objective to enhance and conserve the Shire’s cultural heritage resources while facilitating adaptation and development which does not detract from their significance. Recognition and protection of heritage places and areas is a crucial component of planning in Colac Otway. The development of good conservation practices will ensure the retention and viable re-use of Colac Otway’s significant and contributory heritage places and areas. This policy relates to the heritage strategies and objectives found in the State Planning Policy Framework and the Municipal Strategic Statement. 22.01-2 Objectives 18/06/2009 C55 . To encourage the retention of locally significant and contributory heritage places within Heritage Overlay areas. To ensure that new land uses and developments and external alterations of existing buildings are sympathetic with the appearance and character of heritage places and areas and are consistent with the Statement of Significance and Physical Description of the relevant heritage place or area as listed in the ‘Colac Otway Heritage Study (2003)’. To support the demolition of buildings that are ‘non-contributory’ in a heritage precinct as identified in the ‘Colac Otway Heritage Study (2003)’.
    [Show full text]
  • Main History
    The chronology of Bowls 1844 – First green laid at Mr. Lipscombe’s Beach Tavern at Sandy Bay Tasmania – Bowling Green Hotel Sandy Bay Tasmania 1845 – First recorded game of bowls at the back of the Beach Tavern (Sandy Bay, TAS). 1846 – First bowling club in Australia is established alongside the Bowling Green Hotel in Sandy Bay. (TAS) – This club was closed in 1853. 1848 - Aberdeen Sports and Recreation Club (NSW) 1852 – 1000 spectators paid to watch a match at the Bowling Green Hotel green between civilians and the military. 1864 – Melbourne Bowls Club is formed (oldest existing bowling club in Australia)(Vic) . – First bowls made in Australia, turned by Mr Alcock, Russell Street, Melbourne. – Ballarat Bowling Club (Vic) – Fitzroy (North Fitzroy) Bowling Club (Vic) 1865 – St Kilda Sporting Club (formerly St Kilda Bowling Club) (Vic) – City of Melbourne Bowling Club (Vic) – Fitzroy (North Fitzroy) Bowling Club (Vic) 1866 – City of Melbourne Bowling Club (Vic) 1868 – Carlton Bowling Club (Vic) – Learmonth Bowling Club (Vic) – Richmond Union Bowling Club (Vic) 1872 – George S. Coppin entrepreneur, suggested first bowling carnival in Australia. This was not taken up. – Buninyong Bowls Club Inc (Vic) – Cambridge College Club – (Private Club) 1873 – Albert Park Bowls Club Inc -(Formerly -South Melbourne Bowling Club (1873-1929), Albert Park Bowling Club (1929- 1942), Albert Park VRI Bowls Club (1942-2011) – Creswick Bowling Club (Vic) 1876 – First game of bowls in SA on green put down by Andrew Thomson at Kapund – Kyneton Bowling Club (Vic)
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria
    SURVEY OF POST-WAR BUILT HERITAGE IN VICTORIA STAGE TWO: Assessment of Community & Administrative Facilities Funeral Parlours, Kindergartens, Exhibition Building, Masonic Centre, Municipal Libraries and Council Offices prepared for HERITAGE VICTORIA 31 May 2010 P O B o x 8 0 1 9 C r o y d o n 3 1 3 6 w w w . b u i l t h e r i t a g e . c o m . a u p h o n e 9 0 1 8 9 3 1 1 group CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background 7 1.2 Project Methodology 8 1.3 Study Team 10 1.4 Acknowledgements 10 2.0 HISTORICAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONTEXTS 2.1 Funeral Parlours 11 2.2 Kindergartens 15 2.3 Municipal Libraries 19 2.4 Council Offices 22 3.0 INDIVIDUAL CITATIONS 001 Cemetery & Burial Sites 008 Morgue/Mortuary 27 002 Community Facilities 010 Childcare Facility 35 015 Exhibition Building 55 021 Masonic Hall 59 026 Library 63 769 Hall – Club/Social 83 008 Administration 164 Council Chambers 85 APPENDIX Biographical Data on Architects & Firms 131 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O 3 4 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O group EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this survey was to consider 27 places previously identified in the Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria, completed by Heritage Alliance in 2008, and to undertake further research, fieldwork and assessment to establish which of these places were worthy of inclusion on the Victorian Heritage Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Benalla LGA Profile
    Benalla LGA Profile VicHealth Indicators Survey 2011 Results This profile provides an overview of wellbeing in this LGA. It is designed to provide local governments with population health data to undertake comprehensive, evidence-based municipal public health and Victorian Health wellbeing planning. Promotion Foundation PO Box 154 Benalla highlights* Carlton South, VIC 3053 Australia T +61 3 9667 1333 • Residents of the Rural City of Benalla reported • Benalla City residents were significantly more F +61 3 9667 1375 significantly greater wellbeing than the Victorian likely to volunteer at least once a month (46.6%) [email protected] average. Residents gave their wellbeing an and to report some type of citizen engagement in www.vichealth.vic.gov.au average score of 80.7 out of 100, compared with the previous 12 months (64.4%), compared with the state average of 77.5. Victorian averages (34.3% and 50.5% respectively). October 2012 • Benalla residents who purchased alcohol at • Compared with the state average (88.8%), Publication number: K-041-KN licensed premises in the previous week spent a significantly lower proportion of Benalla ISBN number: 978-1-922133-07-6 significantly less money ($25) than the Victorian residents (84.4%) had internet access at home. average ($45). © Copyright Victorian Health * Significance has been calculated to the 95% level of Promotion Foundation 2012 • Residents of Benalla were significantly less likely probability. Significant difference is indicated when confidence intervals for an LGA estimate do not overlap to report an adequate work–life balance (42.3%), with confidence intervals for the Victorian average.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Industrial Report Rural City of Benalla ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    Regional Industrial Report Rural City of Benalla ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Urban Development Program was undertaken by Spatial Economics Pty Ltd, and commissioned by the Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure. The Urban Development Program (Benalla) would not have been possible if it were not for the invaluable contribution made by staff from the Rural City of Benalla and the Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure’s Hume Regional Office. Published by the Urban Development Program Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure 1 Spring Street Melbourne Victoria 3000 Telephone (03) 9223 1783 September 2013 Unless indicated otherwise, this work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au Urban Development Program, State of Victoria through the Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure 2013 Authorised by Matthew Guy, 1 Spring Street Melbourne Victoria 3000. This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for an error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an accessible format, please telephone (03) 9223 1783 or email [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Hume Regional Growth Plan Summary, May 2014
    SUMMARY The Hume region councils are: Alpine Shire Council, Benalla Rural City Council, Greater Shepparton City Council, Indigo Shire Council, Mansfield Shire Council, Mitchell Shire Council, Moira Shire Council, Murrindindi Shire Council, Strathbogie Shire Council, Towong Shire Council, Wangaratta Rural City Council and Wodonga Council. This document is a summary of the Hume Regional Growth Plan. The full plan is available at www.dtpli.vic.gov.au/regionalgrowthplans Authorised and published by the Victorian Government, 1 Treasury Place, Melbourne Printed by Finsbury Green, Melbourne If you would like to receive this publication in an accessible format, please telephone 1300 366 356. This document is also available in Word format at www.dtpli.vic.gov.au/regionalgrowthplans Unless indicated otherwise, this work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. To view a copy of the licence, visit creativecommons.org/licences/by/3.0/au It is a condition of this Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence that you must give credit to the original author who is the State of Victoria. Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you, but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. May 2014 CONTENTS MINISTER'S MESSAGE i WHY WE NEED
    [Show full text]
  • SCG Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation
    Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation September 2019 spence-consulting.com Spence Consulting 2 Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation Analysis by Gavin Mahoney, September 2019 It’s been over 20 years since the historic Victorian Council amalgamations that saw the sacking of 1600 elected Councillors, the elimination of 210 Councils and the creation of 78 new Councils through an amalgamation process with each new entity being governed by State appointed Commissioners. The Borough of Queenscliffe went through the process unchanged and the Rural City of Benalla and the Shire of Mansfield after initially being amalgamated into the Shire of Delatite came into existence in 2002. A new City of Sunbury was proposed to be created from part of the City of Hume after the 2016 Council elections, but this was abandoned by the Victorian Government in October 2015. The amalgamation process and in particular the sacking of a democratically elected Council was referred to by some as revolutionary whilst regarded as a massacre by others. On the sacking of the Melbourne City Council, Cr Tim Costello, Mayor of St Kilda in 1993 said “ I personally think it’s a drastic and savage thing to sack a democratically elected Council. Before any such move is undertaken, there should be questions asked of what the real point of sacking them is”. Whilst Cr Liana Thompson Mayor of Port Melbourne at the time logically observed that “As an immutable principle, local government should be democratic like other forms of government and, therefore the State Government should not be able to dismiss any local Council without a ratepayers’ referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Historic Western Victorian Lake Conditions in Relation to Fish Deaths
    A REVIEW OF HISTORIC WESTERN VICTORIAN LAKE CONDITIONS IN RELATION TO FISH DEATHS Publication 1108 March 2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Eel deaths occurred in waterways across Victoria from 2004 to 2006. EPA Victoria worked with responsible agencies to investigate the cause of the deaths. An information gap was identified regarding changes throughout the catchments over time. Much of this knowledge had not been documented formally and was difficult to assess. It is important to note that this report is based on a number of published accounts of the historical timeline as well as utilising personal accounts of history. Therefore there may be small discrepancies in exact dates. Anecdotal evidence and unpublished reports of the history of lakes Modewarre, Bolac and Colac indicate that, over the past 150 years, all lakes in the Western District have shown a distinct pattern of drying out during periods of extended drought. As early as 1846 the lakes showed signs of drying, which would indicate that any fish within those lakes also died due to lack of good quality water. The three lakes examined have been stocked by landholders, recreational anglers or commercial eel fishermen to hold the current stock of fish and eels. The catchments in which each lake sits have undergone changes, including culverts being developed to reduce flooding, the size of water storage reservoirs being increased and changes in agricultural practices. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS EPA would like to formally acknowledge the contribution of all those who assisted with the research into the Western District lakes. Much information was held in the minds of those who visit the lakes regularly for recreation, farming and lifestyle, and it is this that has provided such broad insight into one of Victoria’s precious resources.
    [Show full text]