Consultation Statement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Consultation Statement DERBYSHIRE DALES DISTRICT COUNCIL Consultation Statement The Shopfronts and Commercial Properties Design Guidance Supplementary Planning Document Consultation Proposed Revisions to ‘Paint Colours’ This statement has been prepared in order to comply with Regulation 17 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2004 (as amended 2008 & 2009), for the adoption of Supplementary Planning Documents by Local Planning Authorities Director of Planning and Housing Services Paul Wilson MCD, Dip TP, Dip Mgmt, MRTPI, MIMgt Derbyshire Dales District Council Town Hall Matlock Derbyshire DE4 3NN Tel: 01629 761100 Email : [email protected] Preamble Design guidance in the existing Shopfront and Commercial Properties SPD, specifically that relating to ‘Paint Colours’ on pages 16 and 17, was intended to ensure that the colours used on individual properties reflected the historic period from which the property originated. More recently this guidance has been reviewed in the light of architectural paint research undertaken by English Heritage, and other heritage paint manufacturers, including Little Greene (English Heritage), Dulux (Heritage range), and Farrow and Ball with reference also made to the paint ranges set out in the British Standards. This research has identified that many shop fronts from the period 1780 to 1840 (Georgian/Regency) were painted in lighter, more neutral ‘stone’ coloured shades including greys, creams, beige/fawn along with imitation wood, and shades of brown and green. Shop fronts from the period 1840 to 1920 (Victorian/Edwardian) generally used darker, richer colours including blues, greens, reds and black. However the neutral shades of grey, beige/fawn and dark cream from the previous era may also have been used. Based on this research it is therefore considered that the advice contained within the SPD on paint colours should reflect more flexibility in the palette of colours that are considered to be acceptable. Whilst the recommended changes would allow greater flexibility they still seek to preclude the use of colours that do not reflect the historical context of an individual property. This review has been undertaken on the basis that any amendment to the advice within the Shopfront and Commercial Properties SPD would not lead to a detrimental impact upon the special character and appearance of listed buildings, would continue to preserve or enhance conservation areas and would ensure objectivity in the considerations of relevant planning and listed building applications. 1. Introduction 1.1 Under the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2004 it is a requirement to prepare and publish a Consultation Statement for a range of planning policy documents, including Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs). This is a reflection of Government’s desire “to strengthen community and stakeholder involvement in the development of local communities”. 1.2 Regulation 17 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2004 relates to public participation and requires local planning authorities to prepare a Consultation Statement when undertaking consultation on a Supplementary Planning Guidance, or on any proposed revisions to that guidance document. 1.3 This statement is intended to meet the requirements of Regulation 17 and seeks to provide a clear public statement to enable the community to know how they can be involved in the proposed revisions to the Shopfront Design Guidance SPD. The Statement sets out: • The programme for public consultation; • Who will be consulted; • The consultation process and where and how the consultation will take place; • How representations will be incorporated into the process. 2 Programme for Public Consultation 2.1 In order for the District Council to revise the Shopfront SPD, the document must be subject to a formal public consultation process. The Council has resolved that this will be for a period of six weeks. This will enable all interested parties, including statutory organisations, private developers, consultants, amenity groups and the public, to comment on the proposals. 2.2 The six-week formal public consultation process on Proposed Revisions to the Shopfront & Commercial Properties Design Guidance SPD in respect to the section relating to ‘Paint Colours’, will commence on Wednesday 14 th March 2012 and will finish on Wednesday 25 th April 2012. 2.3 Planning Policy Statement 12 (PPS12) recommends that SPD’s should be prepared taking into consideration the process of continuous community involvement. The Council’s Statement of Community Involvement sets out how people will be involved in the consideration of SPDs and it requires the Council to undertake the following consultation for revisions affecting the SPD: • Make the documents available for review at Council offices; • Send the SPD to an existing network of organisations; • Prepare press releases (including a Statutory Notice); • Place information and documents on the Council’s websites. 2.4 Any comments on the proposed revisions to the SPD will need to be received by the District Council by 5.00pm on Wednesday 25 th April 2012. Any representations made after this time will not be accepted. 2.5 Any comments should made in writing and sent to: Mike Hase, Planning Policy Manager, Derbyshire Dales District Council, Town Hall, Matlock, Derbyshire, DE4 3NN Telephone: 01629 761251 Fax: 01629 761163 Email: [email protected] When submitting your representations on the proposed revisions you may also request to be notified at a specified address of the progress and of the future progress and final adoption of the SPD. 3 Who will be Consulted? 3.1 The Council will re-consult, those bodies and individuals previously consulted on the currently adopted SPD: • Parish and Town Councils, within and adjoining Derbyshire Dales; • Statutory consultees identified in relevant planning legislation and guidance; • Planning consultants who work in the District; • Other non-statutory groups such as local civic societies; • Associations representing shop-fitters and Insurance Companies. A list of all the organisations that the Council is consulting is set out in Appendix 1 4 The Public Consultation Process 4.1 In addition to the consultees listed in Appendix 1, the general public are invited to comment on the proposed revisions. In accordance with Regulation 17 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2004 the Council has published a statutory notice in local newspapers advertising the publication of these proposed revisions. 4.2 Copies of the SPD on Shop Fronts and Commercial Properties Design Guidance, the related Existing Extract, the Revised Text and the Consultation Statement will be available for inspection at the following locations: • Derbyshire Dales District Council, Town Hall, Matlock DE3 4NN 09:00 to 17:00 Mon- Fri. • Derbyshire Dales District Council, Leisure Centre, Leisure Way, Ashbourne DE6 1AA - 09.00 to 17.00 Mon - Fri. • Derbyshire Dales District Council, ARC Leisure Matlock, Bakewell Road, Matlock DE4 3AZ - 09.00 to 17.00 Mon - Fri. • Derbyshire Dales District Council, Leisure Centre, Off Hannage Way, Wirksworth DE4 4JG - 09.00 to 17.00 Mon - Fri. • Matlock Town Council, The Imperial Rooms, Imperial Road, Matlock - 09.00 to 15.30 Mon-Fri • Ashbourne Town Council, Town Hall, Ashbourne - 09.00 to 13.00 Mon - Wed • Wirksworth Town Council, Town Hall, Wirksworth - 09.00 to 13.00 Mon -Thu The documents can also be viewed and downloaded from the Council’s website www.derbyshiredales.gov.uk/sfgr . Printed copies of the document will be available upon request. 5 How will Comments and Responses on the Draft SPD be incorporated into the process? The District Council will formally record any written representations on the proposed revisions received within the specified consultation period. Following the closure of the six-week public consultation period, all written responses will be summarised and recorded in a single document. A report will then be produced listing all representations received, a response to each representation and a recommendation as to what changes, if any, should be made to the revisions as proposed on ‘Paint Colours’. This document will be presented to the District Council’s Partnership & Regeneration Committee, and if necessary, amendments will be made prior to adoption. APPENDIX 1 Sudbury Parish Council Tansley Parish Council List of consultees that will be sent the Wirksworth Town Council proposed revisions affecting the section on ‘Paint Colours’ of the Shopfronts and All surrounding Parish Councils Commercial Properties Design Guidance Alderwasley Parish Council Supplementary Planning Document: Ashleyhay & Idridgehay, Alton Parish Council Dethick, Lea & Holloway Parish Council All Parish and Town Councils Kirk Langley Parish Council Alkmonton & Hungry Bentley Parish Council Turnditch & Windley Parish Council Ashbourne Town Council Ashover Parish Council Parish Council Atlow Parish Meeting Trusley Parish Council Ballidon and Bradbourne Parish Council Osleston & Thurvaston Parish Council Biggin by Hulland Parish Meeting Sutton on the Hill Parish Council Bonsall Parish Council Barton Blount Parish Council Boylestone Parish Council Church Broughton Parish Council Bradley Parish Council Foston and Scropton Parish Council Brailsford Parish Council Ellastone Parish Council Brassington Parish Council Mayfield Parish Council Callow Parish Meeting Okeover Parish Council Carsington
Recommended publications
  • Derbyshire Parish Registers. Marriages
    942.51019 M. L; Aalp v.4 1379092 GENEALOGY COLLECTION ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00727 4241 DERBYSHIRE PARISH REGISTERS. flDarriagea, IV. phiiximore's parish register series. vol. xc. (derbyshire, vol. iv.) One hundred and fifty only printed. I0.ip.cj : Derbyshire Parish Registers, flftat triages. Edited by W. P. W. PHILLIMORE, M.A., B.C.L., AND LL. LL. SIMPSON. £,c VOL. IV. ILon&on Issued to the Subscribers by Phillimore & Co., 124, Chancery Lane. 1908. — PREFACE. As promised in the last volume of the Marriage Registers of Derbyshire, the marriage records of St. Alkmund's form the first instalment of the Registers of the County Town. The Editors do not doubt that these will prove especially interesting to Derbyshire people. In Volume V they hope to print further instalments of town registers in the shape of those of St. Michael's and also some village registers. It will be noticed that St. Alkmund's register begins at the earliest possible date, 1538, but of the remainder, two do not start till the seventeenth century and one, that of Quarndon, synchronizes with the passing of Lord Hardwicke's Marriage Act. 1379092 It will be convenient to give here a list of the Derby- shire parishes of which the Registers have been printed in this series: Volume I. Volume II. Dale Abbey Boulton Brailsford Duffield Stanton-by-Dale Hezthalias Lownd Volume III. Stanley or Lund Duffield Spondon Breaston Church Broughton Mellor Kirk Ireton Sandiacre Hault Hucknall Volume IV. Risley Mackworth Derby— St. Alkmund's Ockbrook Allestree Quarndon Tickenhall Foremark It has not been thought needful to print the entries — verbatim.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Broughton Parish, Derbyshire
    Church Broughton Parish, Derbyshire: An oral history, 1900-1940 Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Janet Arthur De Montfort University June 2019 Abstract This study is an oral history of a Derbyshire dairying parish during the first forty years of the twentieth century. The aim was to discover the nature and cohesion of society in a parish with no resident lord of the manor, the effects on the parish of changes in agricultural practice and the impact of government interventions on the lives of individuals. The lives of residents were affected by the history and layout of the parish, based on the geography and previous ownership. Having no resident lord of the manor generated a social structure with three layers: firstly, seven key people, outsiders who did not own land, secondly, networks of small landowners and artisans, who had lived there for generations, finally, labourers, many also families of long standing. Religion was important in supporting this social structure. Being an ‘open’ parish had enabled a chapel to be built and the provision of a school, though not all children attended this school. Through widespread ownership, there was a freedom to live and work without being beholden to neighbouring estates, as alternative employment could be found elsewhere for any surplus workers. Mechanisation improved farming practice, but, though government intervention during the First World War helped, the downturn afterwards and competition between farmers meant dairying was precarious, until the foundation of the Milk Marketing Board in 1933 to control production and price. The sale of the Duke of Devonshire’s farms in 1918 to the occupiers and the County Council removed the prestige that his tenants had enjoyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Etwall Area Meeting
    OPEN ETWALL AREA MEETING 30th April 2002 PRESENT:- District Council Representatives Councillor Whyman (Chair), Councillor Hood (Vice-Chair) and Councillors Lemmon and Mrs. Walton. I. Reid (Deputy Chief Executive), P. Spencer (Members’ Services) and B. Jones (Helpdesk). Derbyshire County Council Representative Councillor Mrs. Littlejohn. Derbyshire Constabulary PC R. Frost. Parish Council Representatives H. Thornton (Burnaston Parish Council), N. Ireland and Mrs. J. Newton (Etwall Parish Council), J. Chisnall and Mrs. L Nash (Findern Parish Council), C. Woodward (Foston and Scropton Parish Council) and J. Cumpstone (Hilton Parish Council). South Derbyshire CVS D. Rider and L. Williams. Members of the Public S. Avery, S. Bell, W.P. Black, B. Cowley, A. Crossley, J. Dove, R. Grimmett, D. Parkinson, J. Smith, I. Smith, S. Salt and G. Wale. APOLOGIES Apologies for absence from the Meeting were received from Inspector Hargreaves (Derbyshire Constabulary), Mrs. H. Hague and Mrs. B. Smedley. EA/25. MINUTES The Minutes of the Area Meeting held on 30th January 2002 were noted. EA/26. CHAIR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS The Chair gave an update on the Lottery funding being sought to provide new leisure facilities in Etwall. Following recent press articles, it was confirmed that the amount of Lottery funding from any successful application was unlikely to meet the costs of building a new Leisure Centre. This information had been reported to the Council’s Community Services Committee, the Leisure Centre Joint Management Committee and its Community Group. The news had been met with disappointment and these views were shared by the Chair, County Councillor Mrs. Littlejohn and others present at the Meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • White's 1857 Directory of Derbyshire
    328 REPTON AND GRESLEY HUNDRED. This Hundred forms the south extremity of the county, and is bounded on the north and west by the river Trent, on the south and east by Leicestershire, having at the south-east extremity a considerable portion detached and completely surrounded by Leicestershire, where No Man’s Heath, in the chapelry of Chilcote, connects the four counties of Leicester, Derby, Stafford and Warwick. It consists 65,677 statue acres, generally a rich red loamy soil, considered the finest agricultural district in the county. The following table is an enumeration of its 27 parishes, showing their territorial extent, the annual value, and their population from 1801 to 1851, as returned at the five decennial periods of the parliamentary census. * The letters after the names signify P for Parish, C for Chapelry, and T for Township. Rate- POPULATION. 1851. Parishes. Acres able Value 1801 1811 1821 1831 1841 Hses Males. Fmles. Total. Appleby, p. 2748 £2075 935 1123 1185 1150 1075 270 576 605 1181 Bretby, p. 1760 2400 265 341 302 325 298 66 188 181 369 * Burton-on-Trent, — — — — — — — — — — — Winshall, t. 1150 2313 309 317 357 342 377 88 196 209 405 Calke, p. 720 1200 96 67 63 58 55 11 32 47 79 Chellaston, p. 816 1250 205 261 338 352 461 113 257 242 499 Chilcote, c. 1320 1920 168 194 192 191 162 33 85 75 160 Church Gresley, p. 1075 2890 245 235 306 671 993 258 655 602 1257 Castle Gresley, t 570 1034 114 119 129 126 164 36 102 88 190 Donisthorpe & 344 92 189 203 392 Oakthorpe, t.
    [Show full text]
  • <5Regfe~G of ~Raflefon,E
    t~t <5regfe~g of ~raflefon,e An Account of the Family, and Notes of its connexions by Marriage and Descent from the Norman Conquest to the Present Day With Appendixes, Pedigrees and lllustratz"ons COMPILED BY FALCONER MADAN, M.A. FELLOW OF BRASENOSE COLLEGE, OXFORD PRINTED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ~1forb HORACE HART, PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY THE GRESLEYS OF DRAKELOWE DERBYSHIRE. aF SIR R0BEiltT GRESLEY. BT. THE DRAKELOWE ESTATE. 1 MILE BURTON-OK-":RE~T. 10 MILES DERBY, 22 :,.nLEil NOTTINGHA:'.l. 30 MILES LEICESTEiR. 33 MILES BIRML'\GHAM. DRAKELOWE SOLD BY SIR ROBERT GRESLEY OWNERSHIP SINCE THE CONQUEST ENDED FROM OUR CORRESPONDENT BURTON-ON-TRENT, DEC. 19 Drakelowe Hall. an Elizabethan man­ sion with a park and estate of 760 acres, near Burton-on-Trent, was bought to-day by Marshall Brothers, timber merchants, of Lenton, Nottingham, and Sir Alb_ert. Ball a Nottingham landowner, actmg jointly. The price was £12,5,00. Thus ended the Gresley family ,; ownership of . Drakelowe, which had lasted for 28 generations, 1 since the Norman Conquesl. i Mr. E. Marshall, senior, a partner In the_ firm, I said that it was strictly a business deal without sentiment. The vendor was Sir Robert Gresley. ' Gres/eys rif Drake/owe Plate I SIR PETER DE GRESLEY d. about A.D. r3ro (From Brit. Mus. MS. Harl. 4205, fol. n2, of the IJth cent.: seep. 43) £1l@dfore jffl:ie quam jfortuna GRESLEY MOTTO, More Faz'thful than Fortunate. IN what old story far away, In what great action is enshrined, The sad sweet motto which to-day Around the Gresleys' name is twined? Was it for country or for crown They played a grand tho' tragic part? Or did they lay their fortune down To strive to win one careless heart? vVe cannot tell: but this we know, That they who chose in that dim past Those noble words,-come weal come woe­ Stood by.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Strategic Director (Service Delivery)
    REPORT OF THE STRATEGIC DIRECTOR (SERVICE DELIVERY) SECTION 1: Planning Applications SECTION 2: Appeals In accordance with the provisions of Section 100D of the Local Government Act 1972, BACKGROUND PAPERS are the contents of the files whose registration numbers are quoted at the head of each report, but this does not include material which is confidential or exempt (as defined in Sections 100A and D of that Act, respectively). -------------------------------- 1. PLANNING APPLICATIONS This section also includes reports on applications for: approvals of reserved matters, listed building consent, work to trees in tree preservation orders and conservation areas, conservation area consent, hedgerows work, advertisement consent, notices for permitted development under the General Permitted Development Order 2015 (as amended) responses to County Matters and strategic submissions to the Secretary of State. Reference Item Place Ward Page 9/2018/0839 1.1 Church Broughton Hilton 5 9/2018/0451 1.2 Swadlincote Swadlincote 18 9/2018/0966 1.3 Hatton Hilton 47 9/2018/1040 1.4 Melbourne Melbourne 59 9/2018/0493 1.5 Weston on Trent Aston 65 9/2018/0857 1.6 Melbourne Melbourne 75 9/2016/1068 1.7 Melbourne Melbourne 85 CW9/2018/0012 1.8 Swadlincote Linton / Newhall 89 and Stanton When moving that a site visit be held, Members will be expected to consider and propose one or more of the following reasons: 1. The issues of fact raised by the report of the Strategic Director (Service Delivery) or offered in explanation at the Committee meeting require further clarification by a demonstration of condition of site.
    [Show full text]
  • Foston Pig Farm Objection
    Objection to Planning Application by Midland Pig Producers for development involving a pig rearing unit together with anaerobic digestion facility and associated infrastructures at land off Uttoxeter Road, Foston, for Midland Pig Producers; Planning Application Code CW9/0311/174 Prepared by DPDS Consulting Group 3 Gleneagles House Vernon Gate Derby DE1 1UP On behalf of Foston Community Forum & Farms Not Factories October 2011 DPDS Ref: C9721 CONTENTS PAGE NO I Executive Summary i 1.0. Introduction 1 2.0. Contravention with National Planning Policies 2 3.0. Contravention with Regional Planning Policies 11 4.0. Contravention with Adopted Local Plan Policies 13 5.0. Site Evaluation Exercise 20 6.0. Landscape and Visual Impact 21 7.0. Impact on Amenity of Adjacent Residential Properties 26 8.0. Transport/Traffic Issues 27 9.0. Public Fears 28 10.0. Conclusions 30 Appendix A: Letter from V.A.A D’Elia BSc, MSc Analytical Chemistry – 9 July 2011-10-26 Appendix B: Paper by Jens Seedorf on ‘Emissions and dispersion of livestock-related biological aerosols’ I. OBJECTION – PLANNING APPLICATION BY MIDLAND PIG PRODUCERS (REF. CW4/0609/77) – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I.1. DPDS Consulting Group are instructed by Foston Community Forum and Farms not Factories to object to the planning application by Midland Pig Producers (ref. CW4/0609/77) for the “ erection of a 2,500 breeding sow pig rearing unit with grain store, feed mill, feed hoppers, mess block, water treatment buildings together with storage buildings feeding an associated anaerobic digestion facility, service building, digestate and methane gas storage tanks supplying an electricity generation facility and incorporating a visitor centre, 4 agriculture workers dwellings with garaging, strategic landscaping, including the formation of bunds, a surface water attenuation pond, and rainwater retention area with site parking facilities, weighbridges, security fencing and associated infrastructure .
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire County Council
    DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL Further Electoral Review of Derbyshire County Council Submission of Proposals for New Patterns of Divisions to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England 2 Table of Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................5 2. GUIDANCE ON PROPOSING A PATTERN OF DIVISIONS.......................5 3. THE COUNCIL’S APPROACH.....................................................................6 4. THE COUNCIL’S PROPOSALS...................................................................7 4.1. AMBER VALLEY .......................................................................................8 4.1.1. ALFRETON AND SOMERCOTES.........................................................9 4.1.2. ALPORT AND DERWENT...................................................................10 4.1.3. BELPER...............................................................................................11 4.1.4. DUFFIELD AND BELPER SOUTH ......................................................11 4.1.5. GREATER HEANOR ...........................................................................12 4.1.6. HEANOR CENTRAL............................................................................13 4.1.7. HORSLEY............................................................................................13 4.1.8. RIPLEY EAST AND CODNOR ............................................................14 4.1.9. RIPLEY WEST AND AMBERGATE.....................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 165 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton, GCB.KBE. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin,QC. MEMBERS The Countess Of Albemarle, DBE. Mr T C Benfield. Professor Michael Chisholm. Sir Andrew Wheatley,CBE. To the Rt Son Boy Jenkins* HP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DERBYSHIRE 1* We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangementa for the district of South Derbyshire, in accordance with the requirements of section 6}..of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that district* 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 19 August 197^ that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the South Derbyshire District Council, copies of which were circulated to Derbyshire County Council, Clerks to the Parish Councils, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of the local newspapers circulating in the area and of the Local Government press* Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies* 3* The South Derbyshire District Council were invited to prepare a draft scheme of representation for our consideration* When doing so, they were asked to observe the rules laid down in Schedule 11 to the Local Government Act 1972, and the guidelines which we set out in our Report No 6 about the proposed size of the council and the proposed number of councillors for each ward* They were also asked to take into account any views expressed to them following their consultation with local interests.
    [Show full text]
  • F B Mcardle, Chief Executive, South Derbyshire District Council, Civic Offices, Civic Way, Swadlincote, Derbyshire DE11 0AH
    F B McArdle, Chief Executive, South Derbyshire District Council, Civic Offices, Civic Way, Swadlincote, Derbyshire DE11 0AH. www.south-derbys.gov.uk @SDDC on Twitter Please ask for Democratic Services Phone (01283) 595722 / 595848 Typetalk 18001 DX 23912 Swadlincote [email protected] Our Ref: DS Your Ref: Date: 18 June 2018 Dear Councillor, Planning Committee A Meeting of the Planning Committee will be held in the Council Chamber, Civic Offices, Civic Way, Swadlincote on Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 18:00. You are requested to attend. Yours faithfully, Chief Executive To:- Conservative Group Councillor Mrs Brown (Chairman), Councillor Mrs Coe (Vice-Chairman) and Councillors Coe, Mrs Hall, Harrison, Muller, Stanton and Watson Labour Group Councillors Dr Pearson, Shepherd, Southerd and Tilley Independent / Non-Grouped Member Councillor Tipping Page 1 of 89 AGENDA Open to Public and Press 1 Apologies and to note any Substitutes appointed for the Meeting. 2 To note any declarations of interest arising from any items on the Agenda 3 To receive any questions by Members of the Council pursuant to Council procedure Rule No. 11. 4 REPORT OF THE STRATEGIC DIRECTOR (SERVICE DELIVERY) 3 - 89 Exclusion of the Public and Press: 5 The Chairman may therefore move:- That in accordance with Section 100 (A)(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended) the press and public be excluded from the remainder of the Meeting as it is likely, in view of the nature of the business to be transacted or the nature of the proceedings, that there would be disclosed exempt information as defined in the paragraph of Part I of the Schedule 12A of the Act indicated in the header to each report on the Agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands Derby
    Archaeological Investigations Project 2008 Desk-based Assessment East Midlands Derby Derby UA (B.56.1/2008) SK35793597 Parish: Breadsall Postal Code: DE1 2PY LAND AT SIDDALS ROAD AND COPELAND STREET, DERBY Archaeological Desk-based Assessment of Land at Siddals Road and Copeland Street, Derby May, R Sheffield : ARCUS, Report: 1204.2(1) 2008, 42pp, pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: ARCUS The site and its immediate environs appeared to have been developed between 1835 and 1852. The development included terraced housing, shops and public houses, a brass foundry and a timber yard, a Methodist chapel, a gasometer and two schools, the gasometer was replaced in 1879. The site was partially redeveloped in the 1930s with a new road laid out along the western boundary. The 1840s buildings were all demolished by 1968 with the 1879 school having been demolished after 1987.Geotechnical investigations suggested that there was the potential for the survival of 19th century archaeological remains in Area 1, whereas Area 2 contained substantial areas of made ground. [Au(abr)] SMR primary record number: 1114 Archaeological periods represented: PM OASIS ID: arcus2-44750 (B.56.2/2008) SK38023641 Parish: Chaddesden Postal Code: DE216LZ LAND AT CHADDESDEN PARK, DERBY An Archaeological Desk-based Assessment of Land at Chaddesden Park, Derby May, R Sheffield : ARCUS, Report: 1249.1(1) 2008, 29pp, colour pls, figs, refs Work undertaken by: ARCUS The site lay adjacent to a postulated 1st century AD Roman road. A Roman coin was found in the park in the 1970s and a large number of coins were recorded to be found in the parish in the 17th century.
    [Show full text]
  • London and Beyond Essays in Honour of Derek Keene
    London and beyond Essays in honour of Derek Keene Edited by Matthew Davies and James A. Galloway London and beyond Essays in honour of Derek Keene London and beyond Essays in honour of Derek Keene Edited by Matthew Davies and James A. Galloway LONDON INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH Published by UNIVERSITY OF LONDON SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU First published in print in 2012. This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY- NCND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN 978 1 909646 44 5 (PDF edition) ISBN 978 1 905165 70 4 (hardback edition) Contents Preface vii List of contributors xi List of gures xv List of tables xvii I. Markets, hinterlands and environments 1. Feeding another city: provisioning Dublin in the later middle ages Margaret Murphy 2. Did peasants need markets and towns? e experience of late medieval England Christopher Dyer 3. e proliferation of markets revisited Richard Britnell 4. ‘Tempests of weather and great abundance of water’: the ooding of the Barking marshes in the later middle ages James A. Galloway II. Luxury, innovation and skill 5. A taste for the Orient? Cosmopolitan demand for ‘exotic’ durable consumables in late medieval Bruges Peter Stabel 6. Hartlib’s world Rob Ilie 7. Hiding in the forest … e Gilberts’ rural scientic instrument manufactory Anita McConnell v London and beyond III. Suburbs, neighbourhoods and communities 8.
    [Show full text]