Major Depressive Disorder As a Co-Morbid Diagnosis in Schizophrenia Versus the Diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder – Depressed Type

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Major Depressive Disorder As a Co-Morbid Diagnosis in Schizophrenia Versus the Diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder – Depressed Type REVIEW S Afr Psychiatry Rev 2005;8:134-139 Major depressive disorder as a co-morbid diagnosis in schizophrenia versus the diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder – depressed type Renata Ronelle du Preez, William Charles Griffith, Mark Page Department of Psychiatry, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to focus on the importance of depressive symptoms in patients suffering from schizophrenia, and the dilemma posed by hierarchical classification methods, which exclude co-morbid diagnoses such as Major Depressive Disorder in patients with schizophrenia. The question arises that if Major Depressive Disorder is only categorized under the diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder (depressed type), are we able to recognize these symptoms promptly and treat them sufficiently? The duration of the substantial period of depressed mood referred to in the DSM IV TR criteria for Schizoaffective Disorder is unspecified. We suggest that one should only allocate the latter diagnosis if the substantial period is that of one third or more of the whole duration of the illness. Identification of the optimal cutoff point can generate further hypothesis testing research and refinement of the diagnostic model. It is not only important to refine the diagnosis, but it is even more important to detect these symptoms and treat promptly and effectively. According to the latest literature, the best possible treatment for depression in schizophrenia appears to be the combination of a second-generation antipsychotic and cognitive psychotherapy. Keywords: Major depression; Schizophrenia; Schizoaffective; Depressed Received: 29.11.04 Accepted: 28.12.04 Introduction in considering psychiatric diagnoses. Diagnostic categories At present, psychiatry is in a state of flux and advances in defined by their syndromes should be regarded as valid neuroscience and genetics are soon likely to challenge only if they have been shown to be discrete entities with many of its current theoretical underpinnings, particularly natural boundaries that separate them from other disorders. those related to the causation and definition of mental Although most psychiatric diagnostic concepts have not disorders. It is increasingly recognized that the validity of been shown to be valid in this sense, many possess high the diagnostic concepts enshrined in contemporary utility by virtue of the information about outcome, treat- classifications of mental disorders cannot be taken for ment response and etiology that they convey and are granted.1 Indeed Goodwin and Guze2 went so far as to therefore invaluable working concepts for the clinician.1 assert that ‘diagnosis is prognosis’ and referred approvingly According to the diagnostic and statistical manual of to P.D.Scott’s observation that the ‘follow up is the great mental disorders (DSM IV TR)3 diagnostic criteria for exposer of truth…..’ It is to the psychiatrist what the post- schizophrenia, major depressive disorder is excluded and mortem is to the physician. should rather be diagnosed under schizoaffective disorder It is important to distinguish between validity and utility (depressed type). Criteria for schizoaffective disorder (depressed type) state that mood symptoms must be Correspondence: present for a substantial portion of the total duration of the Dr RR du Prezz, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pretoria, active and residual periods of the illness, but they do not PBag X113, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa specify the time period.3 It is suggested that this period email: [email protected] must be clearly defined so as to distinguish between South African Psychiatry Review • November 2005 134 REVIEW S Afr Psychiatry Rev 2005;8:134-139 schizoaffective disorder and the possibility of major Depression may occur in the different phases of the disease, depressive disorder as co-morbid diagnosis. either during the prodromal phase, psychotic phase or post Previously the diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder was psychotic phase. considered confusing and controversial. The different For the latter we at least have the better definition of classifications (ICD-104 and DSMIV TR3) agree that post psychotic depression in schizophrenia in the research schizoaffective disorder presents a combination of schizo- criteria in the DSM IV TR.3 Kohler16 and Jeczmien17 discuss phrenia-like and affective symptoms, but differ as to the post psychotic depression in schizophrenia in their respec- quality, number and time sequence of the symptoms. tive publications and highlight the significant prevalence Hierarchical assumptions at the foundation of the estimated at 25%. Criteria for a major depressive episode diagnostic system stand in the way of recognizing associ- must be met and this episode is superimposed on the ated psychiatric syndromes. It is unclear if associated residual phase of schizophrenia. psychiatric syndromes are separate and distinct co-occur- With regard to depression in the prodromal phases, recent ring or co-morbid syndromes or whether they are part of the research has increasingly focused on the early course of patients’ schizophrenic disorder, i.e. dimensions of schizo- schizophrenia, extending from onset of symptoms to the phrenia that need further attention.5 first treatment contact. A high prevalence of depressive Co-occurring or associated psychiatric syndromes such as symptoms in the early course of schizophrenia has been depression may have been hidden from view by exclusion established in several studies. criteria, which prohibited their being diagnosed in the Hafner et al18 did the so-called ABC schizophrenia study, presence of schizophrenia. a population-based, first –episode study. To study depres- Hierarchical thinking has been present in virtually all sion in the early course of schizophrenia, Hafner’s study systems of psychiatric nosology and has been traced back looked at symptom appearance and accumulation. For this to the tendency in medicine to give each patient only one purpose, four depressive symptoms, without overlap with diagnosis, an approach found in the 17th century. negative symptoms of schizophrenia, namely depressed Bogenschutz6 also emphasized the importance of recogniz- mood, guilt feelings, lack of self-confidence and attempted ing multiple diagnoses in one patient to clarify our thinking suicide were used. about categories of illness and the boundaries between Their findings showed that the prodromal phases lasted them as well as the relationship among these categories. on average for 5 years and in total 81% of patients with first With respect to the categorical versus dimensional episode psychosis did suffer from depressed mood for at argument one false assumption is that the disorder is either least 2 weeks before admission. On average depressive categorical or dimensional whereas in a real sense every mood emerged as early as 52 months before first admission. disorder is both. It is either present or not, but when the Important reasons for investigating depression in schizo- disorder is present patients may vary with respect to age- phrenia involve the influence of these additional symptoms of-onset, severity, symptomatology, impairment, resistance on the quality of life of these patients, as well as the to treatment and the variety of other disorder characteris- introduction of the second- generation antipsychotics with tics. One of the important issues in using categorical their possible antidepressant effect is another important approaches pertains to the choice of a cutoff point from reason.8,109 which the categorical classification is generated.7 The choice for a cutoff point of the duration of depression is The difficulties in diagnosing depression in unclear in schizoaffective disorder and this can lead to schizophrenia erroneous conclusions regarding outcome and stage of Whilst one includes the assessment of hopelessness, illness. suicidality and the degree of depression as central tasks in Identification of an optimal cutoff point must generate a treating affective disorders, this is not always the case for hypothesis, with subsequent research and refinement of patients with schizophrenia. the diagnostic model. Schizophrenic patients present with a myriad of distur- bances in perception, cognition and communication, and The impact of depression in schizophrenia depression can go unnoticed especially during the acute It is a fact that depression occurs in patients with schizo- phase as noted by Knights and Hirsch.19 They introduced phrenia.8,9,10 The studies on depressive symptoms and signs the term “[un] revealed depression” and argued that these in schizophrenia show a variation from between 7 and 65%, symptoms may be unrecognized because of florid psychotic with a modal rate of 25%.11,12 It is clear that these symptoms symptoms. are of considerable clinical relevance and compromise the It is also the legacy of Kraeplin’s division of psychotic level of functioning of these patients, even to the extent of conditions into affective psychoses and dementia praecox. an increased risk of relapse and suicide.9,10,11 This contributed to the belief that schizophrenia and We all are familiar with the facts that schizophrenia depression were and are distinct and non-overlapping reduces the life span of those afflicted by an average of 10 - entities. Yet again this may influence the threshold for 15 years, and suicide is the leading cause of premature diagnosing important depressive symptoms in patients death among patients with schizophrenia.12,13,14,15
Recommended publications
  • Is Your Depressed Patient Bipolar?
    J Am Board Fam Pract: first published as 10.3122/jabfm.18.4.271 on 29 June 2005. Downloaded from EVIDENCE-BASED CLINICAL MEDICINE Is Your Depressed Patient Bipolar? Neil S. Kaye, MD, DFAPA Accurate diagnosis of mood disorders is critical for treatment to be effective. Distinguishing between major depression and bipolar disorders, especially the depressed phase of a bipolar disorder, is essen- tial, because they differ substantially in their genetics, clinical course, outcomes, prognosis, and treat- ment. In current practice, bipolar disorders, especially bipolar II disorder, are underdiagnosed. Misdi- agnosing bipolar disorders deprives patients of timely and potentially lifesaving treatment, particularly considering the development of newer and possibly more effective medications for both depressive fea- tures and the maintenance treatment (prevention of recurrence/relapse). This article focuses specifi- cally on how to recognize the identifying features suggestive of a bipolar disorder in patients who present with depressive symptoms or who have previously been diagnosed with major depression or dysthymia. This task is not especially time-consuming, and the interested primary care or family physi- cian can easily perform this assessment. Tools to assist the physician in daily practice with the evalua- tion and recognition of bipolar disorders and bipolar depression are presented and discussed. (J Am Board Fam Pract 2005;18:271–81.) Studies have demonstrated that a large proportion orders than in major depression, and the psychiat- of patients in primary care settings have both med- ric treatments of the 2 disorders are distinctly dif- ical and psychiatric diagnoses and require dual ferent.3–5 Whereas antidepressants are the treatment.1 It is thus the responsibility of the pri- treatment of choice for major depression, current mary care physician, in many instances, to correctly guidelines recommend that antidepressants not be diagnose mental illnesses and to treat or make ap- used in the absence of mood stabilizers in patients propriate referrals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Implications of Hypersomnia in the Context of Major Depression: Results from a Large, International, Observational Study
    ARTICLE IN PRESS JID: NEUPSY [m6+; March 2, 2019;10:45 ] European Neuropsychopharmacology (2019) 000, 1–11 www.elsevier.com/locate/euroneuro The implications of hypersomnia in the context of major depression: Results from a large, international, observational study a a, b c a A. Murru , G. Guiso , M. Barbuti , G. Anmella , a, d ,e a ,f , g g h N. Verdolini , L. Samalin , J.M. Azorin , J. Jules Angst , i j k a, l C.L. Bowden , S. Mosolov , A.H. Young , D. Popovic , m c a, ∗ a M. Valdes , G. Perugi , E. Vieta , I. Pacchiarotti , For the BRIDGE-II-Mix Study Group a Barcelona Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain b Clinica Psichiatrica, Dipartimento di Igiene e Sanità, Università di Cagliari, Italy c Division of Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Edificio Ellisse, 8 Piano, Sant’Andrea delle Fratte, 06132, Perugia, Italy d FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries Research Foundation, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain e Division of Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy f CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France g Fondation FondaMental, Hôpital Albert Chenevier, Pôle de Psychiatrie, Créteil, France h Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics,
    [Show full text]
  • Specificity of Psychosis, Mania and Major Depression in A
    Molecular Psychiatry (2014) 19, 209–213 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1359-4184/14 www.nature.com/mp ORIGINAL ARTICLE Specificity of psychosis, mania and major depression in a contemporary family study CL Vandeleur1, KR Merikangas2, M-PF Strippoli1, E Castelao1 and M Preisig1 There has been increasing attention to the subgroups of mood disorders and their boundaries with other mental disorders, particularly psychoses. The goals of the present paper were (1) to assess the familial aggregation and co-aggregation patterns of the full spectrum of mood disorders (that is, bipolar, schizoaffective (SAF), major depression) based on contemporary diagnostic criteria; and (2) to evaluate the familial specificity of the major subgroups of mood disorders, including psychotic, manic and major depressive episodes (MDEs). The sample included 293 patients with a lifetime diagnosis of SAF disorder, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder (MDD), 110 orthopedic controls, and 1734 adult first-degree relatives. The diagnostic assignment was based on all available information, including direct diagnostic interviews, family history reports and medical records. Our findings revealed specificity of the familial aggregation of psychosis (odds ratio (OR) ¼ 2.9, confidence interval (CI): 1.1–7.7), mania (OR ¼ 6.4, CI: 2.2–18.7) and MDEs (OR ¼ 2.0, CI: 1.5–2.7) but not hypomania (OR ¼ 1.3, CI: 0.5–3.6). There was no evidence for cross-transmission of mania and MDEs (OR ¼ .7, CI:.5–1.1), psychosis and mania (OR ¼ 1.0, CI:.4–2.7) or psychosis and MDEs (OR ¼ 1.0, CI:.7–1.4).
    [Show full text]
  • Depression and Anxiety: a Review
    DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY: A REVIEW Clifton Titcomb, MD OTR Medical Consultant Medical Director Hannover Life Reassurance Company of America Denver, CO [email protected] epression and anxiety are common problems Executive Summary This article reviews the in the population and are frequently encoun- overall spectrum of depressive and anxiety disor- tered in the underwriting environment. What D ders including major depressive disorder, chronic makes these conditions diffi cult to evaluate is the wide depression, minor depression, dysthymia and the range of fi ndings associated with the conditions and variety of anxiety disorders, with some special at- the signifi cant number of comorbid factors that come tention to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). into play in assessing the mortality risk associated It includes a review of the epidemiology and risk with them. Thus, more than with many other medical factors for each condition. Some of the rating conditions, there is a true “art” to evaluating the risk scales that can be used to assess the severity of associated with anxiety and depression. Underwriters depression are discussed. The various forms of really need to understand and synthesize all of the therapy for depression are reviewed, including key elements contributing to outcomes and develop the overall therapeutic philosophy, rationale a composite picture for each individual to adequately for the choice of different medications, the usual assess the mortality risk. duration of treatment, causes for resistance to therapy, and the alternative approaches that The Spectrum of Depression may be employed in those situations where re- Depression represents a spectrum from dysthymia to sistance occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Delusion and Hallucination Types on Treatment
    Dusunen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences 2016;29:29-35 Research / Araştırma DOI: 10.5350/DAJPN2016290103 The Effect of Delusion and Esin Evren Kilicaslan1, Guler Acar2, Sevgin Eksioglu2, Sermin Kesebir3, Hallucination Types on Ertan Tezcan4 1Izmir Katip Celebi University, Ataturk Training and Treatment Response in Research Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Izmir - Turkey 2Istanbul Erenkoy Mental Health Training and Research Schizophrenia and Hospital, Istanbul - Turkey 3Uskudar University, Istanbul Neuropsychiatry Hospital, Istanbul - Turkey Schizoaffective Disorder 4Istanbul Beykent University, Department of Psychology, Istanbul - Turkey ABSTRACT The effect of delusion and hallucination types on treatment response in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder Objective: While there are numerous studies investigating what kind of variables, including socio- demographic and cultural ones, affect the delusion types, not many studies can be found that investigate the impact of delusion types on treatment response. Our study aimed at researching the effect of delusion and hallucination types on treatment response in inpatients admitted with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Method: The patient group included 116 consecutive inpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder according to DSM-IV-TR in a clinical interview. Delusions types were determined using the classification system developed by Gross and colleagues. The hallucinations were recorded as auditory, visual and auditory-visual. Response to treatment was assessed according to the difference in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores at admission and discharge and the duration of hospitalization. Results: Studying the effect of delusion types on response to treatment, it has been found that for patients with religious and grandiose delusions, statistically the duration of hospitalization is significantly longer than for other patients.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Disorders Bob Boland MD Slide 1
    The Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Disorders Bob Boland MD Slide 1 Psychotic Disorders Slide 2 As with all the disorders, it is preferable to pick Archetype one “archetypal” disorder for the category of • Schizophrenia disorder, understand it well, and then know the others as they compare. For the psychotic disorders, the diagnosis we will concentrate on will be Schizophrenia. Slide 3 A good way to organize discussions of Phenomenology phenomenology is by using the same structure • The mental status exam as the mental status examination. – Appearance –Mood – Thought – Cognition – Judgment and Insight Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Disorders. Slide 4 Motor disturbances include disorders of Appearance mobility, activity and volition. Catatonic – Motor disturbances • Catatonia stupor is a state in which patients are •Stereotypy • Mannerisms immobile, mute, yet conscious. They exhibit – Behavioral problems •Hygiene waxy flexibility, or assumption of bizarre • Social functioning – “Soft signs” postures as most dramatic example. Catatonic excitement is uncontrolled and aimless motor activity. It is important to differentiate from substance-induced movement disorders, such as extrapyramidal symptoms and tardive dyskinesia. Slide 5 Disorders of behavior may involve Appearance deterioration of social functioning-- social • Behavioral Problems • Social functioning withdrawal, self neglect, neglect of • Other – Ex. Neuro soft signs environment (deterioration of housing, etc.), or socially inappropriate behaviors (talking to themselves in
    [Show full text]
  • Schizophrenia
    Schizophrenia The upcoming fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) makes several key changes to the category of schizophrenia and highlights for future study an area that could be critical for early detection of this often debilitating condition. Changes to the Diagnosis Schizophrenia is characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech and behavior, and other symptoms that cause social or occupational dysfunction. For a diagnosis, symptoms must have been present for six months and include at least one month of active symptoms. DSM-5 raises the symptom threshold, requiring that an individual exhibit at least two of the specified symptoms. (In the manual’s previous editions, that threshold was one.) Additionally, the diagnostic criteria no longer identify subtypes. Subtypes had been defined by the predominant symptom at the time of evaluation. But these were not helpful to clinicians because patients’ symptoms often changed from one subtype to another and presented overlapping subtype symptoms, which blurred distinc- tions among the five subtypes and decreased their validity. Some of the subtypes are now specifiers to help provide further detail in diagnosis. For example, catatonia (marked by motor immobility and stupor) will be used as a specifier for schizophrenia and other psychotic conditions such as schizoaffec- tive disorder. This specifier can also be used in other disorder areas such as bipolar disorders and major depressive disorder. Area for Further Study Attenuated psychosis syndrome is included in Section III of the new manual; conditions listed there require further research before their consideration as formal disorders. This potential category would identify a person who does not have a full-blown psychotic disorder but exhibits minor versions of relevant symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Depressive Episode
    Molina Healthcare Coding Education Major Depressive Episode Documentation Examples: Initial Diagnosis: 65 year old Latina presenting with new onset depressive symptoms for past 2 months including daily depressed mood, loss of energy and inability to concentrate. PHQ9 score of 12 (moderate depression). Assessment: Patent is newly diagnosed with major depression, single episode, moderate; needing medical and cognitive therapy Accurately diagnosing Major Depression requires distinguishing between a single depressive episode Plan: Start Citalopram 20 mg and refer for psychotherapy and recurrent depression. Hence, it is necessary to ICD-10 Code: F32.1 Major Depressive Disorder, single episode, moderate identify and document the manifestations of the disease burden. Another key consideration is noting OR the term “chronic” can apply to both recurrent and Initial Diagnosis: single depressive episodes. A single or first time event should be coded as F32.0-F32.9 (severity 73 year old female with many known episodes of Major specification required) and any patient who has Depression now complaining of worsening symptoms experienced subsequent episodes should be coded as including increased loss of interest in activities, hypersomnia, increased tearfulness and sadness. Denies F33.9. thoughts of self-harm ICD-10: F32.0-F32.5 Major Depressive Disorder, Assessment: Patient diagnosed with Major Depression, recurrent, single episode, specifier required (e.g., mild; unspecified; currently symptoms not controlled moderate; severe with or without psychotic Plan: Increase SSRI dosage and close follow- up recommended symptoms; in partial or full remission) ICD-10 Code: F33.9, Major Depressive Disorder, OR recurrent, unspecified ICD-10: F33.9 Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent, unspecified The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression.
    [Show full text]
  • Association Between Schizophrenia Polygenic Score and Psychotic Symptoms In
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/528802; this version posted January 26, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Association between schizophrenia polygenic score and psychotic symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease: meta-analysis of 11 cohort studies. Byron Creese1,2*, Evangelos Vassos3*, Sverre Bergh2,4,5*, Lavinia Athanasiu6,7, Iskandar Johar8,2, Arvid Rongve9,10,,2, Ingrid Tøndel Medbøen5,11, Miguel Vasconcelos Da Silva1,8,2, Eivind Aakhus4, Fred Andersen12, Francesco Bettella6,7 , Anne Braekhus5,11,13, Srdjan Djurovic10,14, Giulia Paroni16, Petroula Proitsi17, Ingvild Saltvedt18,19, Davide Seripa16, Eystein Stordal20,21, Tormod Fladby22,23, Dag Aarsland2,8,24, Ole A. Andreassen6,7, Clive Ballard1,2*, Geir Selbaek4,5,25*, on behalf of the AddNeuroMed consortium and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative** 1. University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK 2. Norwegian, Exeter and King's College Consortium for Genetics of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Dementia 3. Social Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London 4. Research centre of Age-related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Pb 68, Ottestad 2312, Norway 5. Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway 6. NORMENT, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 7. NORMENT, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway 8. Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychotic Symptoms in Post Traumatic Stress Disorder: a Case Illustration and Literature Review
    CASE REPORT SA Psych Rev 2003;6: 21-24 Psychotic symptoms in post traumatic stress disorder: a case illustration and literature review Adekola O Alao, Laura Leso, Mantosh J Dewan, Erika B Johnson Department of Psychiatry, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, USA ABSTRACT Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a condition being increasingly recognized. The diagnosis is based on the re-experiencing of a traumatic event. There have been reports of the presence of psychotic symptoms in some cases of PTSD. This may represent in- creased severity or a different diagnostic clinical entity. It has also been suggested that psychotic symptoms may be over-represented in the Hispanic population. In this manuscript, we describe a case to illustrate this relationship and we review the current literature on the relationship of psychotic symptoms among PTSD patients. The implications regarding diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis are discussed. Keywords: Psychosis; PTSD; Trauma; Hallucinations; Delusions; Posttraumatic stress disorder. INTRODUCTION the best of our knowledge is the first report of psychotic symp- Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a psychiatric illness for- toms in a non-veteran adult with PTSD. mally recognized with the publication of the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric CASE ILLUSTRATION Association in 1980.1 Re-experiencing of traumatic events as A 37 year-old gentleman was admitted to a state university hos- recurrent unpleasant images, nightmares, and intrusive feelings pital inpatient setting after alerting his wife of his suicidal is a core characteristic of PTSD.2 Most PTSD research has oc- thoughts and intent to slit his throat with a kitchen knife.
    [Show full text]
  • A Postmortem Neuropathologic Study of 100 Cases
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Alzheimer Disease and Related Neurodegenerative Diseases in Elderly Patients With Schizophrenia A Postmortem Neuropathologic Study of 100 Cases Dushyant P. Purohit, MD; Daniel P. Perl, MD; Vahram Haroutunian, PhD; Peter Powchik, MD; Michael Davidson, MD; Kenneth L. Davis, MD Background: Clinical studies suggest that severe cognitive im- nile plaques or neurofibrillary tangles was not different pairment is common among elderly patients with schizophrenia in the group with schizophrenia compared with the age- who reside in long-stay psychiatric institutions; however, previ- matched controls or the group with nonschizophrenic ous autopsy-based neuropathologic investigations have provided psychiatric disorders. The higher Clinical Dementia Rat- conflicting results about the occurrence of Alzheimer disease (AD) ing Scale scores lacked correlation with neuropatho- in elderly patients with schizophrenia. We report the results of a logic evidence of dementing disorders. In the 87 cases comprehensive neuropathologic study performed to identify AD lacking a neuropathologic diagnosis of AD or other de- and other dementing neurodegenerative diseases in elderly pa- menting disorders, the mean (±SD) Clinical Dementia Rat- tients with schizophrenia. ing Scale score was 2.21 (±1.14), with 43 of the cases scor- ing 3 or higher (indicating severe, profound, or terminal Methods: A neuropathologic examination was per- cognitive impairment). formed on 100 consecutive autopsy brain specimens of patients aged 52 to 101 years (mean, 76.5 years). A cog- Conclusions: This study provides evidence that el- nitive assessment of these cases was also done by em- derly patients with schizophrenia are not inordinately ploying the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale. For com- prone to the development of AD or to increased senile parison, we included 47 patients with nonschizophrenic plaques or neurofibrillary tangle formation in the brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurodevelopmental Disorders B
    DSM-5 Training for DJJ Clinicians and Staff Preparing for DSM-5 Rajiv Tandon, M.D. Professor Of Psychiatry University of Florida May 12, 2014 Florida Hotel and Conference Center - Orlando 1 1 Disclosure Information NO RELEVANT FINANCIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST MEMBER OF THE DSM-5 WORKGROUP ON PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS CLINICIAN AND CLINICAL RESEARCHER 2 2 3 Program Outline • Introduction – Evolution of DSM and Why DSM-5 • Major Changes in DSM-5 – Structure – Content – Implications for Clinical Practice 4 4 What Characteristics Must A Medical Disorder Have? VALIDITY Must define a “Real” entity with distinctive etiology, pathophysiology, clinical expression, treatment, & outcome UTILITY Must be useful in addressing needs of various stakeholders, particularly patients and clinicians Must predict treatment response, guide treatment selection, and predict course and outcome Must be simple and easy to apply RELIABILITY Different groups of people who need to diagnose this condition must be able to do so in a consistent manner 5 5 Validating a Mental Disorder • Approaches to validating diagnostic criteria for discrete categorical mental disorders have included the following types of evidence: – antecedent validators (unique genetic markers, family traits, temperament, and environmental exposure); [ETIOLOGY] – concurrent validators (defined neural substrates, biomarkers, emotional and cognitive processing, symptom similarity); [PATHOPHYSIOLOGY/CLIN.] – and predictive validators (similar clinical course & treatment response [TREATMENT/PROGNOSIS] 6 6
    [Show full text]