Revitalisation of Urban River Spaces
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Eleventh Session of the World Urban Forum
Newsletter 02 - June 2021 ARABIC | CHINESE | FRENCH | RUSSIAN | SPANISH eleventh session The Eleventh Session of the World Urban Forum One year to go until the eleventh World Urban Forum opens in Katowice The countdown to the opening of the eleventh World Urban Forum (WUF11), the premier global meeting on urban issues, has begun. WUF11 will open in the City of Katowice, Poland on 26 June 2022. The Forum will run to 30 June under the theme “Transforming Our Cities for a Better Urban Future.” Over the next twelve months we will open the registration for the huge number of events and meetings taking place during WUF11 including dialogues, special sessions, side events, exhibitions and much more. This will be followed by registration for thousands of delegates including policy makers, mayors, academics, business people, community leaders, urban planners and many others. For more information see the Press Release. Launch event in Katowice, Poland Katowice hosted a special launch event on 12 May 2021 to mark the calendar for the dates and theme of WUF11. WUF11 is being co-organized by Poland’s Ministry of Development Funds and Regional Policy and the Municipal Office of Katowice. During the launch they signed an agreement on the preparation of WUF11 in June 2022. The UN-Habitat Executive Director, Maimunah Mohd Sharif, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, Małgorzata Jarosińska-Jedynak, and the Mayor of Katowice, Marcin Krupa, made a joint video to mark the occasion. The Executive Director also sent her best wishes in a video speech. What do you know about Katowice? Katowice is a city in Upper Silesia in southern Poland, on the Kłodnica and Rawa rivers. -
Action Plan Lower Silesia, Poland
Smart and Green Mining Regions of EU Action Plan Lower Silesia, Poland Leading the European policies Research innovation towards more sustainable mining www.interregeurope.eu/remix Action Plan Lower Silesia, Poland Contents Go to the content by clicking the section title 1. General information 3 2. Policy context 4 3. Action 1: Impact on the changes in the Regional 7 Innovation Strategy of the Lower Silesian Voivodeship for 2011–2020 in the area of mining and raw materials 3.1. Relevance to the REMIX project 7 3.2. Nature of the action 9 3.3. Stakeholders involved 12 3.4. Timeframe 14 3.5. Costs 15 3.6. Funding sources 15 4. Action 2: Improving the governance of the RIS3 16 and raising public awareness of the importance of innovative mining in regional economic development 4.1. Relevance to the REMIX project 16 4.2. Nature of the action 18 4.3. Stakeholders involved 19 4.4. Timeframe 20 4.5. Costs 21 4.6. Funding sources 21 Back to Contents 1. General information Project: REMIX – Smart and Green Mining Regions of EU Partner organisation: The Marshal’s Office of Lower Silesian Voivodeship Country: Poland NUTS2 region: PL51 Lower Silesia Contact person: Ewa Król Email address: [email protected] Phone number: +48 71 776 9396 REMIX Interreg Europe . Action plan 3 Back to Contents 2. Policy context The Action Plan aims to impact: Investment for Growth and Jobs programme European Territorial Cooperation programme Other regional development policy instrument Name of the policy instrument addressed: Regional Innovation Strategy of Lower Silesian Voivodeship The Marshal’s Office of Lower Silesian Voivodeship is the regional authority responsible for the management of regional development policy on the territory of Lower Silesia pursuant to Article 3 of the Act of 6 December 2006 (Dziennik Ustaw [Journal of Laws] 2006, No. -
Czech Republic
WELCOME TO ČESKÝ T ĚŠÍN/CIESZYN - a one city in two countries Těšín lies at the edge of the Silesian Beskids on the banks of the Olza River, at an elevation of about 300m above sea level. The inhabitants of the original fortifies site belonged to the Lusatian culture. In the years from 1287 to 1653 Tesin was the capitl town of a principality under the rule of the Piast Dynasty (Mieszko I.) A “Religious Order” issued in 1568 confirmed the Evangelical religion of the Augsburg Confession in the town and principality. In 1610, the Counter-Reformation. In 1653 Tesin came under the rule of the Czech kings – the Habsburgs. After a great fire in 1789, the town was rebuilt. An industrial quarter arose on the left bank of the Olza River. In 1826, the Chamber of Tesin was established. At the time the objects on Chateau Hill were rebuilt. The revolutionary events of 1848 aggravated social and national problems. At the end of the First World War the Polish National Council of the Duchy of Tesin (Ducatus Tessinensis). In January 1919 – an attack by the Czech Army. In 1920 – Tesin Silesia as well as the town of Tesin was divided by a state border on the basis of a decision by the Council of Ambassadors in Paris. The western suburbs became an independent town called Český T ěšín. The tenement buildings and public facilities built after the year 1920 following the Art Nouveau are in perfect harmony with older edifices, such as the raiway station or the printing house (1806). -
Numbers and Distribution
Numbers and distribution The brown bear used to occur throughout the whole Europe. In the beginning of XIX century its range in Poland had already contracted and was limited to the Carpathians, the Białowieża Forest, the currently non-existent Łódzka Forest and to Kielce region (Jakubiec and Buchalczyk 1987). After World War I bears occurred only in the Eastern Carpathians. In the 1950’ the brown bears was found only in the Tatra Mountains and the Bieszczady Mountains and its population size was estimated at 10-14 individuals only (Buchalczyk 1980). In the following years a slow population increase was observed in the Polish Carpathians. Currently the brown bear’s range in Poland is limited to the Carpathians and stretches along the Polish-Slovak border. Occasional observations are made in the Sudetes where one migrating individual was recorded in the 1990’ (Jakubiec 1995). The total range of the brown bear in Poland is estimated at 5400-6500 km2. The area available for bears based on the predicative model for the habitat is much larger and may reach 68 700km2 (within which approx. 29000 km2 offers suitable breeding sites) (Fernández et al. 2012). Currently experts estimate the numbers of bears in Poland at merely 95 individuals. There are 3 main area of bear occurrence: 1. the Bieszczady Mountains, the Low Beskids, The Sącz Beskids and the Gorce Mountains, 2. the Tatra Mountains, 3. the Silesian Beskids and the Żywiec Beskids. It must be noted, however, that bears only breed in the Bieszczady Mountains, the Tatra Mountains and in the Żywiec Beskids. Poland is the north limit range of the Carpathian population (Swenson et al. -
CHARAKTERYSTYKA JCWP Kategoria JCWP JCW Rzeczna Nazwa JCWP Brynica Od Zb
CHARAKTERYSTYKA JCWP Kategoria JCWP JCW rzeczna Nazwa JCWP Brynica od zb. Kozłowa Góra do ujścia Kod JCWP RW2000921269 Typ JCWP 9 Długośd JCWP [km] 28,02 Powierzchnia zlewni JCWP [km2] 93,21 Obszar dorzecza obszar dorzecza Wisły Region wodny region wodny Małej Wisły Zlewnia bilansowa Przemsza RZGW GL RDOŚ RDOŚ w Katowicach WZMIUW Śląski Zarząd Melioracji i Urządzeo Wodnych w Katowicach Województwo 24 (ŚLĄSKIE) Powiat 2401 (będzioski), 2462 (Bytom), 2469 (Katowice), 2470 (Mysłowice), 2471 (Piekary Śląskie), 2474 (Siemianowice Śląskie), 2475 (Sosnowiec) Gmina 240101_1 (Będzin), 240102_1 (Czeladź), 240103_1 (Wojkowice), 240104_2 (Bobrowniki), 240106_2 (Psary), 246201_1 (Bytom), 246901_1 (Katowice), 247001_1 (Mysłowice), 247101_1 (Piekary Śląskie), 247401_1 (Siemianowice Śląskie), 247501_1 (Sosnowiec) Inne informacje/dane dotyczące JCWP Warunki referencyjne Fitoplankton (wskaźnik fitoplanktonowy IFPL) Fitobentos (Multimetryczny Indeks Okrzemkowy IO) Makrofity (Makrofitowy indeks rzeczny MIR) Makrobezkręgowce bentosowe 0.931 Ichtiofauna Status JCWP Podsumowanie informacji w zakresie wstępnego/ostatecznego wyznaczenia Wstępne wyznaczenie Ostateczne wyznaczenie statusu Status SZCW SZCW Powiązanie JCWP z JCWPd (w rozumieniu ekosystemu zależnego od wód podziemnych) Kody powiązanych JCWPd PLGW2000111 Ocena stanu JCWP Czy JCWP jest monitorowana? M Kod i nazwa podobnej monitorowanej JCWP RW20009213749 (Prądnik od Garliczki (bez Garliczki) do ujścia) Ocena stanu za Stan/potencjał SŁABY lata 2010 - 2012 ekologiczny Wskaźniki Fitobentos, Zawiesina ogólna, BZT5, Przewodnośd, Siarczany, determinujące stan Chlorki, Twardośd ogólna, Azot amonowy, Azot Kjeldahla, Fosfor ogólny Stan chemiczny DOBRY Wskaźniki determinujące stan Stan (ogólny) ZŁY Presje antropogeniczne na stan wód Rodzaj użytkowania części wód rolno-zantropogenizowana Presje/oddziaływania i zagrożenia gospodarka komunalna, przemysł antropogeniczne Ocena ryzyka nieosiągnięcia celu zagrożona środowiskowego Obszary chronione wymienione w zał. IV RDW Obszary wyznaczone na mocy art. -
Silesia, Poland - Regional Profile 1
SILESIA, POLAND - REGIONAL PROFILE 1 REGIONAL PROFILE Silesia GENERAL INFORMATION Country: Poland Region Name: Silesia Region NUTS2 code*: PL22 - Silesia Region NUTS3 code PL22A - Katowicki / PL228 Bytomski PL229 - Gliwicki / PL227 - Rybnicki PL22B - Sosnowiecki / PL22C - Tyski Main urban centres in the region (by population): Katowice - 294,510 / Częstochowa - 222,292 Sosnowiec - 202,036 / Gliwice - 179,806 Zabrze - 173,374 / Bielsko-Biała - 171,259 Bytom - 166,795 / Rybnik - 138,696 Ruda Śląska - 138,000 / Tychy - 127,831 *NUTS: Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics NOTICE ON COVID-19 The data contained within this regional profile was primarily gathered prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is recognised that the pandemic has had an adverse impact on energy demand. Although the consequences and implications are significant, they remain emergent and dynamic. An update to this document should be considered, once these consequences and implications are clearer and more quantifiable. INITIATIVE FOR COAL REGIONS IN TRANSITION SILESIA, POLAND - REGIONAL PROFILE 2 Overview Silesia is the most populated and urbanised region in Poland with over 4.5 million inhabitants. 78% of its population live in cities and its population density is 370 people/km2. The region comprises of eight NUTS-3 subregions, out of which six are notably affected by coal mining and related industries. The communities where the majority of the miners live are located in central and western subregions - namely Katowicki subregion, Bytomski subregion, Gliwicki subregion, Rybnicki subregion, Sosnowiecki subregion, and Tyski subregion. Silesia is the most coal-dependent region in Poland with mining playing an important role in the regional economy. However, its gradual decline in recent years is also apparent as production is declining in view of falling productivity and low profitability. -
Probabilistic Approach of the Upper and Middle Odra Basin Daily Rainfall Modeling
E3S Web of Conferences 17, 00096 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20171700096 EKO-DOK 2017 Probabilistic approach of the Upper and Middle Odra basin daily rainfall modeling Marcin Wdowikowski1,*, Andrzej Kotowski2, Paweł B. Dąbek3, and Bartosz Kaźmierczak2 1Institute of Meteorology and Water Management – National Research Institute, 01-673 Warsaw, Podlesna Street 61, Poland 2Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland 3Institute of Environmental Protection and Development, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Poland pl. Grunwaldzki 24, 50-363 Wroclaw, Poland Abstract. The aim of this study was to obtain the maximum daily rainfall descriptions based on 9 probability distributions in 12 meteorological stations located in Upper and Middle Odra river basin. Analysis included long-term period from 1961 to 2010. Regarding to AIC and BIC informational criterions Gamma distribution that appeared to be best fitted probability distribution to measurement rainfall data series. For several stations, Pareto, Weibull and generalized exponential distributions were also possible to use. For practical purposes it is necessary to carry out a similar analysis for much shorter rainfall intervals. The final evaluation of the suitability of individual probability distributions for constructing maximum rainfall probabilistic models requires further research. 1 Introduction The reliability of urban drainage systems is not fully achievable due to the random nature of precipitation. However, it must be designed in the way that fulfill the contemporary standards of drainage, which is defined as the adaptation of the system to receive the maximum (predicted) storm water streams with a frequency of appearance equal to the acceptable (socially acceptable) frequency of spillage into the terrain [1]. -
JESSICA Evaluation Study for Silesia Disclaimer
Developed for the European Investment Katowice ul. Karłowicza 13 Bank Tel: 32 730 2510, 32 730 2509, 32 730 2511 Fax: 32 730 2512, [email protected] JESSICA Evaluation Study for Silesia Disclaimer This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. City Consulting Institute Sp. z o.o. C i t y C o nsulting Institute Page 2 Table of Contents 1. Review of the market for urban regeneration projects in the Silesia region ................................ 14 1.1. Regeneration projects implemented in Silesia ...................................................................... 14 1.1.1. Financing sources of regeneration projects .................................................................. 14 1.1.2. Principles of financing regeneration projects ............................................................... 14 1.1.3. Formal conditions necessary to implement regeneration projects .............................. 16 1.1.4. Availability of resources for regeneration projects ....................................................... 18 1.1.5. Characteristics of the completed projects .................................................................... 19 1.1.6. Conclusions for JESSICA ................................................................................................ -
From the City District to the Coal Mine and Back Silesia City Center
Smart strategies for the transition in coal intensive regions Project No: 836819 Fact Sheet: From the city district to the coal mine and back Silesia City Center APRIL 2020 Description The Katowice district of Dąb, where Silesia City Center stands today, is the oldest of the districts. Its origins date back to the end of 13th century. In the 17th century the first mine in Katowice was established there. The district developed intensively in the 19th century when the metallurgical boom caused an increase in demand for coal and so in 1838 the "Waterloo" mine was established. At the beginning of the 20th century, the “Eminence” mine began mining - exactly in its place today is Silesia City Center. In 1953 the name "Eminence" disappeared. In honor of the Czechoslovak Prime Minister Klement Gottwald, the mine was named "Gottwald" and then merged with the "Kleofas" mine. The mine was closed down in the 1990s. The area of this mine was revitalized at the beginning of the 21st century. The revitalization plan assumed the construction (on the area of 30 ha) of a complex of modern urban architecture consisting of commercial, recreational and entertainment facilities, a housing estate and office and multi-service facilities. The site of the former “Kleofas” mine has become one of the largest restructured and revitalized areas in Europe. The site's reclamation through the construction of the Silesia City Center was carried out in the years 2004 - 2005, restoring the area's possibilities of performing new urban functions for Katowice, the conurbation and the region, while maintaining its historical and mining character. -
7.Prezentacja 29.11.2011
PrzedsiPrzedsięębiorstwobiorstwo GospodarkiGospodarki WodnejWodnej ii RekultywacjiRekultywacji S.A.S.A. 4444 – –335 335 Jastrz Jastrz ęębiebie Zdr Zdrójój , , ul. ul. Chlebowa Chlebowa22 22 tel.tel. 032 032 / /47 47-- 630 630– –73 73 (do (do 79) 79) fax: fax: 032 032 / /47 47-- 630 630 - -70 70 IstotnyIstotnyIstotny problemproblemproblem gospodarkigospodarkigospodarki wodnej:wodnej:wodnej: ---zasoleniezasolenie zasolenie w w wódóódd powierzchniowych powierzchniowychpowierzchniowych ---odprowadzanieodprowadzanie odprowadzanie zasolonych zasolonychzasolonych w w wódóódd kopalnianychkopalnianychkopalnianych ZespZespółół autorski: autorski: in in ŜŜ. .Gra GraŜŜynayna Szwarc Szwarc mgrmgr in in ŜŜ. .Barbara Barbara Widenka Widenka mgrmgr in in ŜŜ. .Grzegorz Grzegorz Mrowiec Mrowiec mgrmgr in in ŜŜ. .Jacek Jacek Pustelnik Pustelnik mgrmgr in in ŜŜ. .Andrzej Andrzej Sok Sokółół www.pgwir.pl e -mail: [email protected] , www.pgwir.pl e -mail: [email protected] , www.pgwir.pl Warto ść graniczna wska źnika jako ści wody, w łaściwa dla kasy 200 [mg Cl/l] 150 [mg SO 4/l] I Rozporz ądzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 20 sierpnia Warto ść graniczna wska źnika 2008 r. w sprawie sposobu klasyfikacji stanu jednolitych jako ści wody, w łaściwa dla kasy 300 [mg Cl/l] 250 [mg SO 4/l] cz ęś ci wód powierzchniowych II Dz. U. 2008 Nr 162 poz. 1008 - za łącznik nr 1 Przekroczenie warto ści granicznych dla klasy II, klasyfikuje wody pod kątem elementów fizykochemicznych poni Ŝej stanu dobrego § 17 ust.1 pkt 2 Warto ść graniczna wska źnika jako ści wody, 1 000 [mg Cl+SO 4/l] dopuszczalna w przypadku odprowadzania ścieków (przy za łoŜeniu ą Rozporz ądzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 24 lipca 2006 przemys łowych oraz wód pochodz cych z pe łnego wymieszania) odwodnienia zak adów górniczych r. -
Dual Citizenship in Opole Silesia in the Context of European Integration 701
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series: Philosophy, Sociology and Psychology Vol. 2, No 10, 2003, pp. 699 - 716 DUAL CITIZENSHIP IN OPOLE SILESIA IN THE CONTEXT OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION UDC 342.718(=112.2)(438.19):341.215.2(4-672 EU) Tomasz Kamusella Opole University, Opole, Poland E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. In Poland’s region of Opole Silesia, ethnic Germans constitute one-third of the populace. Most of them (re-)acquired German citizenship in the 1990s. This also meant obtaining EU citizenship. Thus, they form the largest compact group of German/EU citizens residing outside Germany/the EU. Should Poland join the EU with too long a derogation period on the free movement of its citizens throughout the Union, it would create EU citizenship of two classes in Opole Silesia. With the full set of privileges for German citizens and a restricted one for Polish citizens. I argue that it may lead to resurfacing of the nationalist tension with widespread international repercussions. Key words: dual citizenship, Opole Silesia, Germany, Poland, European Union. OPOLE SILESIA, ETHNICITY AND STATEHOOD This article focuses on a territorial unit which emerged as a distinctive region quite re- cently. The name of Silesia refers to the historical province that extended from Gör- litz/Zgorzelec in the west, to Katowice (Kattowitz)1 in the east, along the banks of the Oder River. In the 15th century it became the usual practice to speak about Silesia's west- ern half centered on the city of Breslau (Wrocław) as Lower Silesia, and to dub its eastern part governed from Oppeln (Opole) as Upper Silesia. -
Interpelacje Poselskie W Sejmie Śląskim 1922—1939 Regulacja Prawna I Praktyka
Interpelacje poselskie w Sejmie Śląskim 1922—1939 Regulacja prawna i praktyka Pamiatke mojich Rodičov a Brata NR 3443 Józef Ciągwa Interpelacje poselskie w Sejmie Śląskim 1922—1939 Regulacja prawna i praktyka Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego • Katowice 2016 Redaktor serii: Prawo Andrzej Matan Recenzent Tomasz Kruszewski Spis treści Wykaz skrótów 9 Wstęp 11 1. Interpelacje poselskie w I Sejmie Śląskim (10 października 1922— 23 stycznia 1929) 17 1.1. Regulacja prawna interpelacji poselskich w I Sejmie Śląskim (10 października 1922—23 stycznia 1929) 17 1.1.1. Formy prawne regulacji prawa interpelowania 17 1.1.2. Regulacja prawna interpelowania w projektach ustawy o autonomii województwa śląskiego 18 1.1.3. Regulacja prawna interpelowania w projekcie Komisji Konstytu- cyjnej i w ustawie konstytucyjnej z dnia 15 lipca 1920 roku, zawie- rającej statut organiczny województwa śląskiego (Dz.U.R.P. Nr 73, poz. 497) 20 1.1.4. Geneza art. 44 regulaminów obrad I Sejmu Śląskiego: tymczasowego (z 13 października 1922 roku) i stałego (z 31 stycznia 1923 roku) 21 1.1.5. Systematyka i analiza prawna art. 44 regulaminów obrad I Sejmu Śląskiego: tymczasowego (z 13 października 1922 roku) i stałego (z 31 stycznia 1923 roku) 31 1.1.5.1. Systematyka art. 44 regulaminów obrad I Sejmu Śląskiego 31 1.1.5.2. Analiza prawna art. 44 regulaminów I Sejmu Śląskiego 35 1.1.5.2.1. Regulacja prawna interpelowania w pierwszym okresie 38 1.1.5.2.2. Regulacja prawna interpelowania w drugim okresie 41 1.1.5.2.3. Regulacja prawna interpelowania w trzecim okre- sie 43 1.1.6.