Aerotropolis Atlanta Brownfield Redevelopment Health Impact Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aerotropolis Atlanta Brownfield Redevelopment Health Impact Assessment Aerotropolis Atlanta Brownfield Redevelopment Health Impact Assessment Produced for Health Impact Project, an initiative of The Pew Charitable Trusts and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Prepared by Center for Quality Growth and Regional Development at the Georgia Institute of Technology Catherine L. Ross, Ph.D., Director and Harry West Chair Michael L. Elliott, Ph.D., Associate Director Michelle Marcus Rushing & Jason Barringer, Research Scientists Sarah Cox, Alexandra Frackelton, John Kent, & Arthi Rao, Research Assistants December 2011 Atlanta Aerotropolis Brownfield Redevelopment Health Impact Assessment About the Health Impact Table of Contents Project Acknowledgements ........................................................................... 1 The Health Impact Project, a collaboration of the Robert Executive Summary........................................................................... 2 Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts, is a Understanding the Aerotropolis HIA ............................................. 5 national initiative designed to promote the use of health impact assessments (HIAs) as HIA Results and Recommendations ............................................ 6 a decision-making tool for policymakers. HIAs use a Reading the Report ..................................................................... 10 flexible, data-driven approach that identifies the health Using the Results and Recommendations ................................ 11 consequences of new policies and develops practical Resources .................................................................................... 12 strategies to enhance their health benefits and minimize Introduction ..................................................................................... 14 adverse effects. For more information, visit About Health Impact Assessment .............................................. 16 www.healthimpactproject.org. What is health? ....................................................................... 16 What is a Health Impact Assessment? .................................. 17 About the Center for Quality About Aerotropolis ....................................................................... 20 Growth and Regional Development HIA and Aerotropolis ................................................................... 25 The Center for Quality Growth Screening ................................................................................. 25 and Regional Development (CQGRD) is an applied research Why conduct an HIA on the Atlanta Aerotropolis Brownfield center of the Georgia Institute of Technology. The Center Redevelopment? ..................................................................... 30 serves communities— particularly those in the Scoping & Methodology .................................................................. 33 Southeast United States—by producing, disseminating, and Community Assessment ............................................................. 33 helping to implement new ideas and technologies that Demographic Profile ............................................................... 33 improve the theory and practice of quality growth. For Health Profile ........................................................................... 36 more information about CQGRD, visit Geographic Profile ................................................................... 45 www.cqgrd.gatech.edu. Stakeholders Who Influence Project Outcome ..................... 47 Stakeholder Engagement ........................................................... 50 © 2011 by Center for Quality Introduction ............................................................................. 50 Growth and Regional Development (CQGRD). All The Advisory Committee ......................................................... 50 rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two Stakeholder Survey ................................................................. 55 paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission Stakeholder Summary ............................................................ 57 provided that full credit, including the © notice, is given Methodology ................................................................................ 58 to source. Available electronically at Connecting Environmental and Policy Determinants with http://www.cqgrd.gatech.edu/ Health ...................................................................................... 58 Healthy Places Audit ............................................................... 58 Cover Credit: Center for Quality Growth and Regional Latent Demand Scores ........................................................... 60 Development Walkability Audit ...................................................................... 67 Mapping Access ...................................................................... 70 Literature Review Purpose and Procedure ............................ 70 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Recommendations .................................................................. 71 Numerous people advised on this project, including the City Aerotropolis Site Plan Review..................................................... 73 of Hapeville, the City of Atlanta, Fulton County Department of Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ............................................ 74 Health, Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, Traffic and Transportation ...................................................... 76 and members of Southside Concerned Citizens. Housing .................................................................................... 78 Site Evolution ........................................................................... 79 Assessment of Impacts .................................................................. 81 Safe, Active, Multimodal Transportation Environments ............... 82 Background: Health and Transportation ................................... 82 Planning Environment ................................................................. 84 Connectivity ............................................................................. 84 Trip Generation & Mode Choice ............................................. 94 Traffic safety ............................................................................ 98 Level of service/ infrastructure ........................................... 106 Healthy Places Audit: Transportation ...................................... 110 Implementing a safe, pleasant, and functional pedestrian environment ......................................................................... 110 Livable Streets ...................................................................... 113 Distance to destinations ...................................................... 117 Bicycle Infrastructure ........................................................... 120 Institutional support ............................................................. 121 Economic Activities and Opportunities ....................................... 123 Background: Health and Access ............................................. 123 Planning Environment .............................................................. 125 Access to retail ..................................................................... 125 Activity nodes........................................................................ 131 Access to jobs ....................................................................... 133 Property values and tax revenue......................................... 138 Healthy Places Audit: Economy ............................................... 142 Vibrant activity nodes........................................................... 142 Parking supply and pricing .................................................. 145 Enable access to nutritious food ......................................... 147 Community Preservation and Revitalization .............................. 150 Background: Health and Community ...................................... 150 Planning Environment .............................................................. 151 Re-energizing Communities ................................................. 151 Social connections ............................................................... 154 Healthy Places Audit: Community ........................................... 159 Housing Balance .................................................................. 159 Public safety ......................................................................... 161 Environmental Exposures ............................................................ 164 Background: Health and the Environment ............................. 164 Planning Environment .............................................................. 165 Transportation emissions .................................................... 165 Noise ..................................................................................... 169 Brownfields ........................................................................... 172 Healthy Places Audit: Environment ......................................... 176 Pollutant Mitigation .............................................................. 176 Greenspace .......................................................................... 177 Environmental Tobacco Smoke........................................... 180 Overarching Issues ......................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Optimizing EEC Development Via the Aerotropolis Strategy
    Presentation to EEC Stakeholders Bangkok, Thailand 20 December 2018 Optimizing EEC Development via the Aerotropolis Strategy U-Tapao Airport City John D. Kasarda, Director Center for Air Commerce BUSINESS CONCEPTS LLC TM Kenan-Flagler Business School JOHN D. KASARDA, PRESIDENT University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill aerotropolisbusinessconcepts.aero© Dr. John D. Kasarda, 2018 Setting the Competitive Context • Thailand and its Eastern Economic Corridor are at an industrial development crossroads as an increasingly fast-paced, globally networked economy is changing the rules of competition and business location. • Strategic decisions and development initiatives being taken today will determine the 21st-century direction the EEC and the entire nation will go in terms of industrial mix, business competitiveness, foreign investment, job creation, and citizen prosperity. © Dr. John D. Kasarda, 2018 2 Four Critical Challenges 1. Will Thailand and the EEC continue to successfully develop “new economy” high-tech (S-Curve) industries and high-value business services sectors complementing their traditional agriculture, manufacturing, and tourist sectors? 2. Will the EEC’s S-Curve industries and modern business services sectors be able to compete effectively throughout Asia and worldwide in the decades ahead? © Dr. John D. Kasarda, 2018 3 Critical Challenges (cont’d) 3. Will job creation in the EEC over the next ten years achieve the goals in quantity, quality, and equitable opportunity set by government leaders? 4. Will logistics, industrial, and commercial development at and around U-Tapao International Airport be economically efficient, attractive, and environmentally sustainable presenting a positive first and last impression to air travelers and becoming an enduring magnet for new economy businesses and their talented workers? How these four interwoven challenges are met will go a long way in determining the EEC’s future economic success and its leadership role in executing Thailand 4.0 policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Aerotropolis Visioning Study Infrastructure Development for the Colorado Aerotropolis Study Area
    Colorado Aerotropolis Visioning Study Infrastructure Development for the Colorado Aerotropolis Study Area Prepared by May 2016 Table of Contents Introduction and Overview ................................................................................. 1 Study Vision ................................................................................................ 1 Study Objectives .......................................................................................... 1 Study Area .................................................................................................. 2 Working Paper Organization ............................................................................. 2 Infrastructure Needs Assessment .......................................................................... 3 Purpose for Infrastructure Development .............................................................. 3 Support for Infrastructure Development .............................................................. 4 Aerotropolis Scenario Infrastructure Needs ........................................................... 5 Utilities .................................................................................................. 5 Water Supply ......................................................................................... 5 Wastewater ........................................................................................... 7 Power Utilities ....................................................................................... 8 Communications
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of Critical Success Factors for In-Town Check-In in Taiwan
    sustainability Article The Analysis of Critical Success Factors for In-Town Check-In in Taiwan Cheng-Hua Yang 1 , Huei-Ju Chen 2,* , Li-Chu Lin 3 and Alastair M. Morrison 4 1 Department of Airline and Transport Service Management, National Kaohsiung University of Hospitality and Tourism, Kaohsiung City 812, Taiwan; [email protected] 2 Department of Leisure and Recreation Management, National Kaohsiung University of Hospitality and Tourism, Kaohsiung City 812, Taiwan 3 Department of Tourism and Hospitality, Private Chung-Hsin High School, Hsinchun County 304, Taiwan; [email protected] 4 Department of Marketing, Events and Tourism, Business School, University of Greenwich in London, London SE10 9LS, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +886-7806-0505 (ext. 31405) Abstract: The Taoyuan International Airport in Taiwan encountered service capacity bottlenecks for insufficient facilities before COV-19 break. In order to increase the service capacity efficiency on check-in, security checks, and customs clearance, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications R.O.C. (MOTC), Taiwan, rerouted the airport traffic flow by implementing the in-town check-in (ITCI) concept to decrease crowding in the airport waiting hall. This research examined the structure of critical success factors (CSFs) for ITCIs, deriving three hierarchies of three dimensions, eight criteria, and 18 evaluation indexes from the previous literature, expert interviews, and analysis results from Analytic Network Process (ANP) via Super Decisions software. The three CSF dimensions were: first- level hierarchy “advantageous environments,” followed by “marketing” and “service value,” which is a second-level hierarchy. The study concluded that the third level item of “transferred vehicles system and management” can play an important key role in ITCTs and “users’ usage preference” has a high correlation to ITCT management strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadmap for Auto Community Revitalization
    REVITALIZATION RD SUSTAINABLE WAY ROADMAP FOR AUTO COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION A Toolkit for Local Officials Seeking to Clean Up Contamination, Revive Manufacturing, Improve Infrastructure & Build Sustainable Communities iii Roadmap for Auto Community Revitalization Acknowledgements This document is the result of the combined efforts of a partnership between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization (OBLR), the Department of Labor’s (DOL) Office of Recovery for Auto Communities and Workers, and the Manufacturing Alliance of Communities (formerly the Mayors Automotive Coalition (MAC)). DOL, EPA, and the Manufacturing Alliance of Communities acknowledge the assistance provided by OBLR’s contractor, Environmental Management Support (EMS), Inc. In addition, several organizations and individuals provided valuable assistance to the authors of this report. We acknowledge the cooperation of the mayors, city managers, economic development directors, and other officials from localities across the nation that are the drivers of automotive community revitalization. These leaders dedicate themselves to better communities and a better nation. Their struggles, stories and successes form the basis of this roadmap. DOL, EPA and the MAC also acknowledge the cooperation of The Funders’ Network for Smart Growth & Livable Communities, The Ford Foundation, and the Surdna Foundation in their collective efforts to support communities in the revitalization of brownfields. Please note that DOL and EPA do not endorse
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Feasibility of an Aerotropolis Around Cleveland Hopkins International Airport
    Prepared for: Assessing the Berea Community Development Corporation Feasibility of Prepared by: an The Center for Public Management Aerotropolis Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs Cleveland State University Around Cleveland August 2010 Hopkins International Airport: Executive Report Feasibility of an Aerotropolis ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Center for Public Management would like to acknowledge the contribution of the advisory group who provided valuable input during all phases of the project. Michelle Boczek Economic Development Commissioner, City of Brook Park Rebecca Corrigan Executive Director, Berea Community Development Corporation Shelley Cullins Economic Development Officer, Grant Writer, City of Parma John Hoose Manager, Policy and Research/Acting Development Manager, City of Cleveland, Department of Port Control Roseann Jones Economic Development Director, City of Olmsted Falls Tom Lehman Manager, Real Estate and Noise Abatement, Cleveland Airport System Tracey Nichols Economic Development Director, City of Cleveland We also thank Robert Peterson and Jeremy Levine with the IX Center for hosting the stakeholder discussion sessions, and the many participants of these sessions for sharing their time, input, and ideas toward this project. The Center for Public Management 2 Feasibility of an Aerotropolis TABLE OF CONTENTS Assessing the Feasibility of an Aerotropolis ..............................................................5 The Aerotropolis Concept .............................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Global Aerotropolis Versus Local Aqua-Community: Conflicting Landscapes in the Extended Bangkok Metropolitan Region, Thailand
    The Sustainable World 205 Global aerotropolis versus local aqua-community: conflicting landscapes in the extended Bangkok Metropolitan Region, Thailand S. Nasongkhla1 & S. Sintusingha2 1Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, University Technology Malaysia, Malaysia 2Landscape Architecture Program, Faculty of Architecture Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Australia Abstract Samutprakan province, located in the alluvial flood plain that once formed part of the pre-existing mangrove forests of the lower Chao Phraya River, has been affected by rapid urbanization from Bangkok since the 1980s, which has had significant impacts upon the hydrological system. Today, Samutprakan could be further transformed by the discourse of global city branding through the initiative of the Suvarnabhumi Aerotropolis. We conducted a time-series analysis of aerial photographs of the Bang Pli and Bang Pla districts of Samutprakan province to investigate how the landscape has been changed over time and the results indicate that the intensified industrial and higher density residential developments exacerbated the deteriorating ecological conditions of the waterway. Despite the proposal of an environmentally friendlier alternative of aquatic modern living, the strong tendency is that traditional aquatic cultural livelihoods and urban agriculture are being displaced and gentrified by the new town development. Keywords: environmental sustainability, landscape change, local livelihoods, city branding, urban expansion. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol 142, © 2010 WIT Press www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 (on-line) doi:10.2495/SW100191 206 The Sustainable World 1 Introduction Panitchpakdi [8] noted that the ribbon development in the eastern region of Bangkok is highly significant in terms of population, industrial growth and national economic development that link to the Eastern Sea Board Project further down the Gulf of Thailand’s east coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiwan's Taoyuan Aerotropolis Project on Track to Begin in 2018
    Taiwantrade News Taiwan's Taoyuan Aerotropolis Project on track to begin in 2018 The Taoyuan International Airport and the government are gearing up for a massive infrastructure expansion project set to begin in 2018; The Taoyuan Aerotropolis project. The massive infrastructure development plan is set to receive final approval in March, and then the Taoyuan City Government will have the clear to begin seeking contractors to start construction. Located in Taoyuan City in northwestern Taiwan, the Taoyuan Aerotropolis will essentially create a modern industrial logistics center, development zone as well as a modern urban residential neighborhood, all surrounding the current Taoyuan International Airport. Concept plans for the massive 4,500 hectare project have been in the works since as early as 2009, and the project will possibly be the largest infrastructure project in Taiwan’s history. Promoted as a “Gateway to Taiwan and to Asia,” the project calls for new rail lines, including a new MRT line for the Aerotropolis zone itself. In addition to the Taoyuan International Airport, the new complex will include the following five key zones; a Green Innovation Zone, a Logistics and Trading Zone, a LOHAS Residential Zone, a Passenger Transportation and Retail Zone, and an Administration and Business Service Zone. Taiwantrade News The current plans are also being promoted in step with the government’s “5+2" Industrial Innovation program, and will be integrated into the Asia Silicon Valley Development initiative. The entire project will also be a fertile ground for investment in smart technologies, Internet of Things, and the development of “green” technology and design.
    [Show full text]
  • Governing Airport Cities
    Global Airport Cities Spring 2009 Governing the aerotropolis How are today’s airport regions being administered? The Kenan Institute’s Dr Stephen Appold and Dr John Kasarda investigate. Aviation-linked commercial development, once confined largely to airport property and its immediate environs, is rapidly spreading outward. In the process, a new airport- anchored urban economic region is forming – the aerotropolis. The aerotropolis encompasses the airport city and the air commerce driven areas surrounding it. Some of these airport-linked developments primarily serve passenger-driven retail, restaurants, accommodations, and conference and exhibition facilities. Other airport areas have a heavy concentration of freight-handling facilities, while others are oriented towards filling regional office space needs. Indeed, most large airports now anchor an extensive region with multiple aviation- oriented functions. Given that these functions often encompass multiple jurisdictions, planning and co- ordinating aerotropolis development is frequently intertwined with issues of governance (administrative control). A successful aerotropolis requires co-ordinated investments in land use and ground transportation that leverage each other to the economic and environmental benefit of businesses, land owners, local governments, and the broader region. Three types of governance structures have evolved over time. These can be categorised as market, hierarchy and network. In practice, hybrid forms are most common. Market-driven The earliest aerotropolis forms to appear were market-based. That is, individual firms located near airports to maximise their own economic benefit given the evolving real estate supply and demand situation. In the US, airport cities surrounding Atlanta, Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW) and Chicago O’Hare international airports typify marked-based processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Sustainability Measures for Airports By
    Environmental Sustainability Measures for Airports by Maha Mousavi Sameh & Juliana Scavuzzi Occasional Paper Series: Sustainable International Civil Aviation The attached Occasional Papers have been prepared by a group of scholars associated with the Institute of Air and Space Law (IASL) at McGill University. They are the result of a collaborative effort between the IASL and the Centre for International Sustainable Development Law and are designed to be part of a book prepared by authors from both groups which will eventually be published by the Cambridge University Press under the title Sustainable International Civil Aviation. As the title of the book suggests, bringing together these various scholars and papers is the central theme of the sustainable development of international aviation. In particular, the work of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), the primary United Nations body tasked with regulating the environmental aspects of international aviation, and the provisions of the Chicago Convention which lays down powers of the Organization and the fundamental rules of international air law, form the primary focus of this collection. At the next ICAO Assembly in September-October of 2016, ICAO has the ambitious mandate to finalise a global scheme to limit CO2 emissions from international aviation. As many of the articles contained in the book are of immediate relevance to the discussions due to take place at ICAO, publishing and disseminating these draft chapters will contribute to the growing interest and debates on the issue of the environmental impact of aviation. It is hoped that these papers will contribute to the work of the Assembly and that informed readers and delegates participating at the ICAO Assembly will have constructive comments to share with the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Sydney Aerotropolis Special Infrastructure Contributions Analysis
    Western Sydney Aerotropolis Special Infrastructure Contributions Analysis Department of Planning Industry and Environment October 2020 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation All care and diligence has been exercised in the preparation of this report. Forecasts or projections developed as part of the analysis are based on adopted assumptions and can be affected by unforeseen variables. Consequently, Atlas Urban Economics Pty Ltd does not warrant that a particular outcome will result and accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage that may be suffered as a result of reliance on this information Western Sydney Aerotropolis Executive Summary BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW The Aerotropolis is a 11,200ha precinct surrounding the future Western Sydney International (Nancy-Bird Walton) Airport (WSA) and falls within the Liverpool and Penrith local government areas (LGAs). The planning package for the Aerotropolis was finalised in September 2020 and includes - the Western Sydney Aerotropolis Plan (WSAP), the Western Sydney Aerotropolis State Environmental Planning Policy (the Aerotropolis SEPP) and Stage 1 of the Western Sydney Aerotropolis Development Control Plan 2020 (the DCP). Six of 10 precincts in the Aerotropolis have been rezoned - the Initial Precincts (Aerotropolis Core, Badgerys Creek, Northern Gateway, Wianamatta-South Creek, Agribusiness Precinct) and the Mamre Road Precinct. Atlas Urban Economics (Atlas) is engaged by the NSW Department of Planning, Infrastructure and Environment (DPIE) to examine the potential for a Special Infrastructure Contribution (SIC) in the following areas (referred to as ‘the Study Area’): • Initial Precincts: Lands within 1200m of proposed Metro stations (WS Aerotropolis and Luddenham) and Mixed Use zones within the Initial Precincts (referred to as ‘Station Precincts’) Lands in the Aerotropolis outside the Station Precincts • The Mamre Road Precinct.
    [Show full text]
  • Participant Biographies
    Co-sponsored by: The White House Council on Automotive Communities and Workers United States Department of Labor The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Funders’ Network for Smart Growth and Livable Communities MAY 18, 2010 SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES Ellen Alberding Ellen Alberding is president and a board member of the Joyce Foundation, which has assets of $750 million and makes grants of $40 million a year for projects to improve the quality of life in the Great Lakes region. The foundation is a major funder of environmental groups in the Midwest, with a particular focus on water and air quality. Other foundation priorities include improving educational outcomes for low-income children; employment and workforce issues; and other initiatives that promote democracy and a diverse and thriving culture. Ms. Alberding is a founder and board member of Advance Illinois, which advocates for public education reform in Illinois. She is a board member of Independent Sector, where she has worked to establish improved accountability and governance standards for non-profits. She is a board member of the Economic Club of Chicago as well as a trustee of the National Park Foundation. She has served as president and chairman of the investment committee for the Chicago Park District pension fund (1993–2001); trustee of Aon Funds (2000–2003); trustee of the American University of Paris (2007–2008); treasurer of Grantmakers in the Arts (a national organization of arts funders); member of the Public Trust Task Force for the Donors Forum of Chicago; and member of the Cultural Advisory Board for the City of Chicago. She is a member of the Commercial Club, the Chicago Network, and serves on the advisory boards of several nonprofit organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Easterninfluence
    Sunday Edition December 2, 2018 BARTOW COUNTY’S ONLY DAILY NEWSPAPER $1.50 MPO touches $1.4B economic corridor plan unveiled upon Cass- BY JAMES SWIFT include 900 single family units, 2,100 active adult [email protected] facility units, 300 townhomes and 75,000 square White Road feet of medical office. The completed development Bartow County got its first glimpse of a pro- is projected to top out at around 3,700 residential posed tax allocation district (TAD) in and around units and 565,000 square feet of commercial and improvements, Emerson Wednesday morning, as plans for the residential property. $1.4 billion Etowah-Allatoona Economic Corridor The Allatoona Landing project would include a sidewalk work were revealed to the public. 100-key hotel, 500 marina expansion slips and an The plans largely revolve around two major pro- 8,000-square-foot amphitheater. grant monies posed economic developments — a 1,000 acre- The plan was presented as part of a public hear- plus commercial and residential mixed-use site, ing concerning a resolution to authorize a TAD BY JAMES SWIFT called Etowah Highlands, and a revamped Alla- “down around the proposed Jacoby development [email protected] toona Landing project with 30,000 square feet of at Paga Mine Road,” said Bartow County Admin- retail and 200 vacation rental units. istrator Peter Olson. Bartow Transportation Planner Tom Sills ran down a lengthy list RANDY PARKER/THE DAILY TRIBUNE NEWS The Etowah Highlands project would be con- Jim Jacoby, the Atlanta-based real estate devel- The proposed Etowah Highlands project would create 3,700 structed atop the old Paga Mine property, abutting oper referenced by Olson, hasn’t been secretive of updates at Wednesday’s residential units and 565,000 square feet of commercial and the Etowah River to the north and Red Top Moun- Cartersville-Bartow Metropolitan residential properties on the old Paga Mine site.
    [Show full text]