DOCSLIB.ORG

Current Developments in Language Testing. Anthology Series 25

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Current Developments in Language Testing. Anthology Series 25 DOCUMENT RESUME ED 365 144 FL 021 757 AUTHOR Anivan, Sarinee, Ed. TITLE Current Developments in Language Testing. Anthology Series 25. INSTITUTION Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization (Singapore). Regional Language Centre. REPORT NO ISBN-9971-74-037-0; ISSN-0129-8895; RELCP383-91 PUB DATE 91 NOTE 271p.; Selected papers presented at the Regional Language Centre Seminar on Language Testing and Language Programme Evaluation (April 9-12, 1990). For selected individual papers, see also ED 328 072; ED 350 819, ED 322 725, ED 342 211, ED 317 073, ED 322 729. PUB TYPE Collected Works General (020) Collected Works Serials (022) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC11 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Communicative Competence (Languages); Comparative Analysis; Computer Assisted Testing; Cues; English (Second Language); Evaluation CriterCa; Instructional Materials; International Programs; Interviews; Item Response Theory; Language Aptitude; *Language Proficiency; Language Research; *Language Tests; *Second Languages; Simulation; Sociocultural Patterns; Speech Skills; Teacher Developed Materials; *Test Format; *Testing; Testing Programs; Test Validity; Trend Analysis; Writing Evaluation; Writing Exercise IDENTIFIERS *Oral Proficiency Testing ABSTRACT The selection of papers on language testing includes: "Language Testing in the 1990s: How Far Have We Come? How Much Further Have We To Go?" (J. Charles Alderson); "Current Research/Development in Language Testing" (John W. 011er, Jr.); "The Difficulties of Difficulty: Prompts in Writing Assessment" (Liz Hamp-Lyons, Sheila Prochnow); "The Validity of Writing Test Tasks" (John Read); "Affective Factors in the Assessment of Oral Interaction: Gender and Status" (Don Porter); "Authenticity in Foreign Language Testing" (Peter Doye); "Evaluating Communicative Tests" (Keith Morrow); "Materials-Based Tests: How Well Do They Work?" (Michael Milanovic); "Defining Language Ability: The Criteria for Criteria" (Geoff Brindley); "The Role of Item Response Theory in Language Test Validation" (T. F. McNamara); "The International English Language Testing System IELTS: Its Nature and Development" (D. E. Ingram); "A Comparative Analysis of Simulated and Direct Oral Proficiency Interviews" (Charles W. Stansfield); "Southeast Asian Languages Proficiency Examinations" (James Dean Brown, H. Gary Cook, Charles Lockhart, Teresita Ramos); "Continuous Assessment in the Oral Communication Class: Teacher Constructed Test" (Shanta Nair-Venugopal); and "What We Can Do with Computerized Adaptive Testing...And What We Cannot Do!" (Michel Laurier). (MSE) CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS INLANGUAGE TESTING REGIONAL LANGUAGE CENTRE Edited by SARINEE ANIVAN SEAMEO ANTHOLOGY SERIES25 fill 11 1111111 III111 till PERMISSION 1 0 REPRODUCE. T HIS U S. DEPAWTMENT OF EDUCATION Othce or EctucahonaIResevch and Improvement MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) 9,17.../us document has been reproduced as rece.ne4 from the person or organization originating 0 Mmor changes have been made to improve reproduction duality Pthntsol ,/vr Or opinions stated in this docu- TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES ment do not neCessanly rnpresentotfrthal INFORMATION CENTER IERICI- OERI ouseton cr ooliCy III 40 .., CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS IN LANGUAGE TESTING CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS IN LANGUAGE TESTING Edited by Sarin= Anivan Anthology Series 25 Published by SEAMEO Regional Language Centre c.4. RELCP383-91 se. Copyright 1991 by SEAMEO Regional Language Centre 30 Orange Grove Road Singapore 1025 ISBN 9971-74-037-0 ISSN 0129-8895 Printed by Fong & Sow, Printets Pte. 1.td. () CONTENTS Page Foreword iv Introduction Language Testing in the 1990s: How Far Have 1 We Come? How Much Further Have We To Go? I Charles Alderson Current Research/Development in Language 27 Testing John W 01 ler Jr The Difficulties of Difficulty: Prompts in 58 Writing Assessment Liz Hamp-Lyons and Sheila Prochnow The Validity of Writing Test Tasks 77 John Read Affective Factors in the Assessment of Oral 92 Interaction: Gender and Status Don Porter Authenticity in Foreign Language Testing 103 Peter Dove Evaluating Communicative Tests 111 Keith Morrow Materials-13a=! Tests: How Well Do They 119 Work? Michael Milanovic Defining Language Ability: T ne Criteria 139 For Criteria Geoff Brindley The Role of Item Resporse Theory in 165 Language Test Validation T F McNamara The International English Language Testing 185 System 1ELTS: Its Nature and Development D E Ingrain A Comparative Analysis of Simulated and 199 Direct Oral Proficiency Interviews Charles W Stansfield 7 Southeast Asian Languages Proficiency 210 Examinations James Dean Brown H Gary Cook Charles Lockhart Teresita Ramos Continuous Assessment in the Oral 230 Communication Class: Teacher Constructed Test Shanta Nair-Venugopal What We Can Do with Computerized Adaptive 244 Testing... And What We Cannot Do! Michel Laurier List of Contributors 256 iii FOREWORD Considerable interest in current language testing and the evaluation of language teaching programmes amongst both researchers and language educators was evidenced by the excellent and wide-ranging attendance at RELC's Regional Seminar on Language Testing and Language Programme Evaluation held from 9-12 April 1990. Many well-known personalities in the field, from within and outside the SEAMEO member colntries, attended and gave papers or workshops.I am happy that RELC is able to publish selected papers that appear in this volume. The importance of language testing is recognized by virtualiy all professionals in the field of language education. It is of special importance in education systems that are highly competitive, as education systems in Southeast Asia tend to be, as testing is not only an indirect stimulus to learning, but plays a crucial role in determining the success or failure of an individual's career, with direct implications for his future earning power. Moreover, in countries where education is seen as central tosocio- economic development, it is important that tests be valid and reliable.It is our belief that where validity and reliability arc lacking, individuals as well as educational programmes suffer, and society at large is the loser. Thus, testing is an important tool in educational research and for programmeevaluation, and may even throw light on both thc nature of language proficiencyand language learning. Although the theme of the 1990 Seminar encompassed both testing and programme evaluation, it has not been possible to coverboth areas in one anthology, and the present volume deals with papers on testing. Thosethat deal with programme evaluation will be published in a separatevolume later. Thc papers presented hcrc are inevitably a selection, limitations of space having forced us to omit a number of papers.However, I am confident that the papers offered all make worthwhile contributions to the importantfield of language testing, and that thcy will be of interest to languageeducators both within and beyond Southeast Asia. Eatnest Lau Director, RELC 9 iv INTRODUCTION The hoped-for developments in language testing did not materialiseduring the 1980s.In spite of rapid growth in the field, many of the problemsthat existed a decade ago arc still with us. Alderson in his paper inthis volume sums up the past decade as one in which,"there has been much movement, a lot of it sideways and backwards and not much of it ... forwards% Hedescribes areas where language testing has made progress, but also lists problemswhich are as yet intractable, and includes recommendationsfor a wide range of topics on which research can bc target*.ed. Naturally, as in all research, thc approach taken and thebasis of the research is crucial to the findings. Oiler points out some ofthe fundamental problems of research in language testing. He argues for a greaterunderstanding of language proficiency from the point of view of semioticabilities and processes, as well as thc different perspectivesof the various people that are involved in the test making and test taking processes. Thevariances that show up in language proficiency tests could thus be correctly identified and their sourcesproperly attributed and controlled. The validity of the tests wouldbe more secure and their significance unambiguous. Language testing couldthen be a "proving ground" for language theories, and hence hdp to define the natureof language proficiency. A number of writers in this collection discuss sourcesof variance in tcst results-prompts arc discussed by Prochnow andHamp-Lyons, experience by Read, affective factors by Porter. Prochnow andHamp-Lyons report that prompts such as topic assignment andselection make a difference in grades. Read similarly shows that tcst type makes adifference in getting different performance from test takers. Porter argues that the genderof the interviewer is anothcr source of variance in tcst results. v According to Oiler, language learning will take place when learners can connect their text (discourse) with their own experience, and it is the congruence between tests and experience that is crucial in determining the validity of tests. So long a ; this congruence or connection exists, there is less need for real world experience or authenticity to be inserted into the tests. Boyé similarly offers the view that complete authenticity is neither possible nor desirable. He calls for some balance between authenticity and abstraction, since hc believes that what we gain in validity through authenticity may result in a loss in tcrms of generalisability. Broader educational traditions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Why Is Language Typology Possible?
    Why is language typology possible? Martin Haspelmath 1 Languages are incomparable Each language has its own system. Each language has its own categories. Each language is a world of its own. 2 Or are all languages like Latin? nominative the book genitive of the book dative to the book accusative the book ablative from the book 3 Or are all languages like English? 4 How could languages be compared? If languages are so different: What could be possible tertia comparationis (= entities that are identical across comparanda and thus permit comparison)? 5 Three approaches • Indeed, language typology is impossible (non- aprioristic structuralism) • Typology is possible based on cross-linguistic categories (aprioristic generativism) • Typology is possible without cross-linguistic categories (non-aprioristic typology) 6 Non-aprioristic structuralism: Franz Boas (1858-1942) The categories chosen for description in the Handbook “depend entirely on the inner form of each language...” Boas, Franz. 1911. Introduction to The Handbook of American Indian Languages. 7 Non-aprioristic structuralism: Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) “dans la langue il n’y a que des différences...” (In a language there are only differences) i.e. all categories are determined by the ways in which they differ from other categories, and each language has different ways of cutting up the sound space and the meaning space de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1915. Cours de linguistique générale. 8 Example: Datives across languages cf. Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison 9 Example: Datives across languages 10 Example: Datives across languages 11 Non-aprioristic structuralism: Peter H. Matthews (University of Cambridge) Matthews 1997:199: "To ask whether a language 'has' some category is...to ask a fairly sophisticated question..
    [Show full text]
  • Manual for Language Test Development and Examining
    Manual for Language Test Development and Examining For use with the CEFR Produced by ALTE on behalf of the Language Policy Division, Council of Europe © Council of Europe, April 2011 The opinions expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe. All correspondence concerning this publication or the reproduction or translation of all or part of the document should be addressed to the Director of Education and Languages of the Council of Europe (Language Policy Division) (F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex or [email protected]). The reproduction of extracts is authorised, except for commercial purposes, on condition that the source is quoted. Manual for Language Test Development and Examining For use with the CEFR Produced by ALTE on behalf of the Language Policy Division, Council of Europe Language Policy Division Council of Europe (Strasbourg) www.coe.int/lang Contents Foreword 5 3.4.2 Piloting, pretesting and trialling 30 Introduction 6 3.4.3 Review of items 31 1 Fundamental considerations 10 3.5 Constructing tests 32 1.1 How to define language proficiency 10 3.6 Key questions 32 1.1.1 Models of language use and competence 10 3.7 Further reading 33 1.1.2 The CEFR model of language use 10 4 Delivering tests 34 1.1.3 Operationalising the model 12 4.1 Aims of delivering tests 34 1.1.4 The Common Reference Levels of the CEFR 12 4.2 The process of delivering tests 34 1.2 Validity 14 4.2.1 Arranging venues 34 1.2.1 What is validity? 14 4.2.2 Registering test takers 35 1.2.2 Validity
    [Show full text]
  • Does Washback Exist?
    DOCUMENT RESUME FL 020 178 ED 345 513 AUTHOR Alderson, J. Charles; Wall,Dianne TITLE Does Washback Exist? PUB DATE Feb 92 Symposium on the NOTE 23p.; Paper presented at a Educational and Social Impactsof Language Tests, Language Testing ResearchColloquium (February 1992). For a related document, seeFL 020 177. PUB TYPE Reports - Evaluative/Feasibility(142) Speeches/Conference Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Classroom Techniques;Educational Environment; Educational Research; EducationalTheories; Foreign Countries; Language Research;*Language Tests; *Learning Processes; LiteratureReviewa; Research Needs; Second LanguageInstruction; *Second Languages; *Testing the Test; Turkey IDENTIFIERS Nepal; Netherlands; *Teaching to ABSTRACT The concept of washback, orbackwash, defined as the influence of testing oninstruction, is discussed withrelation to second second language teaching andtesting. While the literature of be language testing suggests thattests are commonly considered to powerful determiners of whathappens in the classroom, Lheconcept of washback is not well defined.The first part of the discussion focuses on the concept, includingseveral different interpretations of the phenomenon. It isfound to be a far more complextopic than suggested by the basic washbackhypothesis, which is alsodiscussed and outlined. The literature oneducation in general is thenreviewed for additional information on theissues involved. Very little several research was found that directlyrelated to the subject, but studies are highlighted.Following this, empirical research on language testing is consulted forfurther insight. Studies in Turkey, the Netherlands, and Nepal arediscussed. Finally, areas for additional research are proposed,including further definition of washback, motivation and performance,the role of educational explanatory setting, research methodology,learner perceptions, and factors. A 39-item bibliography isappended.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing L2 Academic Speaking Ability: the Need for a Scenario-Based Assessment Approach
    Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 36-40 The Forum Assessing L2 Academic Speaking Ability: The Need for a Scenario-based Assessment Approach Yuna Seong Teachers College, Columbia University In second language (L2) testing literature, from the skills-and-elements approach to the more recent models of communicative language ability, the conceptualization of L2 proficiency has evolved and broadened over the past few decades (Purpura, 2016). Consequently, the notion of L2 speaking ability has also gone through change, which has influenced L2 testers to constantly reevaluate what needs to be assessed and how L2 speaking assessment can adopt different designs and techniques accordingly. The earliest views on speaking ability date back to Lado (1961) and Carroll (1961), who took a skills-and-elements approach and defined language ability in terms of a set of separate language elements (e.g., pronunciation, grammatical structure, lexicon), which are integrated in the skills of reading, writing, listening, and speaking. According to their views, speaking ability could be assessed by test items or tasks that target and measure different language elements discretely to make inferences on one’s speaking ability. On the other hand, Clark (1975) and Jones (1985) put emphasis on communicative effectiveness and the role of performance. Clark (1975) defined speaking ability as one’s “ability to communicate accurately and effectively in real-life language-use contexts” (p. 23), and this approach encouraged the use of performance tasks that replicate real-life situations. However, the most dominant approach to viewing L2 speaking ability and its assessment has been influenced by the models of communicative competence (Canale, 1983; Canale & Swain, 1980) and communicative language ability (Bachman, 1990; Bachman & Palmer, 1996), which brought forth a multicomponential approach to understanding speaking ability in terms of various underlying and interrelated knowledge and competencies.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Get Published in ESOL and Applied Linguistics Serials
    How to Get Published in TESOL and Applied Linguistics Serials TESOL Convention & Exhibit (TESOL 2016 Baltimore) Applied Linguistics Editor(s): John Hellermann & Anna Mauranen Editor/Journal E-mail: [email protected] Journal URL: http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/ Journal description: Applied Linguistics publishes research into language with relevance to real-world problems. The journal is keen to help make connections between fields, theories, research methods, and scholarly discourses, and welcomes contributions which critically reflect on current practices in applied linguistic research. It promotes scholarly and scientific discussion of issues that unite or divide scholars in applied linguistics. It is less interested in the ad hoc solution of particular problems and more interested in the handling of problems in a principled way by reference to theoretical studies. Applied linguistics is viewed not only as the relation between theory and practice, but also as the study of language and language-related problems in specific situations in which people use and learn languages. Within this framework the journal welcomes contributions in such areas of current enquiry as: bilingualism and multilingualism; computer-mediated communication; conversation analysis; corpus linguistics; critical discourse analysis; deaf linguistics; discourse analysis and pragmatics; first and additional language learning, teaching, and use; forensic linguistics; language assessment; language planning and policies; language for special purposes; lexicography; literacies; multimodal communication; rhetoric and stylistics; and translation. The journal welcomes both reports of original research and conceptual articles. The Journal’s Forum section is intended to enhance debate between authors and the wider community of applied linguists (see Editorial in 22/1) and affords a quicker turnaround time for short pieces.
    [Show full text]
  • Call for Proposals: Language Testing Special Issue 2021
    February 28, 2019 Call for Proposals: Language Testing Special Issue 2021 The editors of Language Testing invite proposals from prospective guest editors for the 2021 special issue of the journal. Each year Language Testing devotes a special issue to papers focused on an area of current importance in the field. Guest editors are responsible for overseeing the solicitation, review, editing, and selection of articles for their special issue. Upcoming and past special issue topics have included the following: 2020: Repeated Test Taking and Longitudinal Test Score Analysis, edited by Anthony Green and Alistair Van Moere 2018: Interactional Competence, edited by India Plough, Jayanti Banerjee and Noriko Iwashita 2017: Corpus Linguistics and Language Testing, edited by Sara Cushing 2016: Exploring the Limits of Authenticity in LSP testing: The Case of a Specific-Purpose Language Tests for Health Professionals, edited by Cathie Elder 2015: The Future of Diagnostic Language Assessment, edited by Yon Won Lee 2014: Assessing Oral and Written L2 Performance: Raters’ Decisions, Rating Procedures and Rating Scales, edited by Folkert Kuiken and Ineke Vedder 2013: Language Assessment Literacy, edited by Ofra Inbar-Lourie 2011: Standards-Based Assessment in the United States, edited by Craig Deville and Micheline Chalhoub-Deville 2010: Automated Scoring and Feedback Systems for Language Assessment and Learning, edited by Xiaoming Xi The Language Testing editors will be happy to consider proposals on any coherent theme pertaining to language testing and
    [Show full text]
  • British Council, London (England). English Language *Communicative Competence
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 258 440 FL 014 475 AUTHOR Alderson, J. Charles, 54.; Hughes, Arthur, Ed. TITLE Issues in Language Testing. ELT Documents 111. INSTITUTION British Council, London (England). English Language and Literature Div. REPORT NO ISBN-0-901618-51-9 PUB DATE 81 NOTE 211p, PUB TYPE Collected Works - General (020)-- Reports - Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Communicative Competence (Languages); Conference Proceedings; *English (Second Language); *English for Special Purposes; *Language Proficiency; *Language Tests; Second Language Instruction; Test Validity ABSTRACT A symposium focusing on problems in the assessment of foreign or second language learning brought seven applied linguists together to discuss three areas of debate: communicative language testing, testing of English for specific purposes, and general language proficiency assessment. In each of these areas, the participants reviewed selected papers on the topic, reacted to them on paper, and discussed them as a group. The collected papers, reactions, and discussion reports on communicative language testing include the following: "Communicative Language Testing: Revolution or Evolution" (Keith Morrow) ancl responses by Cyril J. Weir, Alan Moller, and J. Charles Alderson. The next section, 9n testing of English for specific purposes, includes: "Specifications for an English Language Testing Service" (Brendan J. Carroll) and responses by Caroline M. Clapham, Clive Criper, and Ian Seaton. The final section, on general language proficiency, includes: "Basic Concerns /Al Test Validation" (Adrian S. Palmer and Lyle F. Bachman) and "Why Are We Interested in General Language Proficiency'?" (Helmut J. Vollmer), reactions of Arthur Hughes and Alan Davies, and the `subsequent response of Helmut J. Vollmer.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Development Language Development
    Language Development rom their very first cries, human beings communicate with the world around them. Infants communicate through sounds (crying and cooing) and through body lan- guage (pointing and other gestures). However, sometime between 8 and 18 months Fof age, a major developmental milestone occurs when infants begin to use words to speak. Words are symbolic representations; that is, when a child says “table,” we understand that the word represents the object. Language can be defined as a system of symbols that is used to communicate. Although language is used to communicate with others, we may also talk to ourselves and use words in our thinking. The words we use can influence the way we think about and understand our experiences. After defining some basic aspects of language that we use throughout the chapter, we describe some of the theories that are used to explain the amazing process by which we Language9 A system of understand and produce language. We then look at the brain’s role in processing and pro- symbols that is used to ducing language. After a description of the stages of language development—from a baby’s communicate with others or first cries through the slang used by teenagers—we look at the topic of bilingualism. We in our thinking. examine how learning to speak more than one language affects a child’s language develop- ment and how our educational system is trying to accommodate the increasing number of bilingual children in the classroom. Finally, we end the chapter with information about disorders that can interfere with children’s language development.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Language Variation and Universals: a Survey on Typological Linguistics for Natural Language Processing
    Modeling Language Variation and Universals: A Survey on Typological Linguistics for Natural Language Processing Edoardo Ponti, Helen O ’Horan, Yevgeni Berzak, Ivan Vulic, Roi Reichart, Thierry Poibeau, Ekaterina Shutova, Anna Korhonen To cite this version: Edoardo Ponti, Helen O ’Horan, Yevgeni Berzak, Ivan Vulic, Roi Reichart, et al.. Modeling Language Variation and Universals: A Survey on Typological Linguistics for Natural Language Processing. 2018. hal-01856176 HAL Id: hal-01856176 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01856176 Preprint submitted on 9 Aug 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Modeling Language Variation and Universals: A Survey on Typological Linguistics for Natural Language Processing Edoardo Maria Ponti∗ Helen O’Horan∗∗ LTL, University of Cambridge LTL, University of Cambridge Yevgeni Berzaky Ivan Vuli´cz Department of Brain and Cognitive LTL, University of Cambridge Sciences, MIT Roi Reichart§ Thierry Poibeau# Faculty of Industrial Engineering and LATTICE Lab, CNRS and ENS/PSL and Management, Technion - IIT Univ. Sorbonne nouvelle/USPC Ekaterina Shutova** Anna Korhonenyy ILLC, University of Amsterdam LTL, University of Cambridge Understanding cross-lingual variation is essential for the development of effective multilingual natural language processing (NLP) applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Research on Language and Learning: Implications for Language Teaching
    Research on Language and Learning: Implications for Language Teaching EVA ALCÓN' Universitat Jaume 1 ABSTRACT Taking into account severa1 limitations of communicative language teaching (CLT), this paper calls for the need to consider research on language use and learning through communication as a basis for language teaching. It will be argued that a reflective approach towards language teaching and learning might be generated, which is explained in terms of the need to develop a context-sensitive pedagogy and in terms of teachers' and learners' development. KEYWORDS: Language use, teaching, leaming. INTRODUCTION The limitations of the concept of method becomes obvious in the literature on language teaching methodology. This is also referred to as the pendulum metaphor, that is to say, a method is proposed as a reform or rejection of a previously accepted method, it is applied in the language classroom, and eventually it is criticised or extended (for a review see Alcaraz et al., 1993; Alcón, 2002a; Howatt, 1984; Richards & Rodgers, 1986; Sánchez, 1993, 1997). Furthermore, * Addressfor correspondence: Eva Alcón Soler, Dpto. Filología Inglesa y Románica, Facultat Cikncies Humanes i Socials, Universitat Jaume 1, Avda. Sos Baynat, s/n, 12071 Castellón. Telf. 964-729605, Fax: 964-729261. E-mail: [email protected] O Servicio de Publicaciones. Universidad de Murcia. All rights reserved. IJES, VOL 4 ((1,2004, pp. 173-196 174 Eva Alcón as reported by Nassaji (2000), throughout the history of English language teaching methodology, there seems to be a dilema over focused analytic versus unfocused experiential language teaching. While the former considers learning as the development of formal rule-based knowledge, the latter conceptualises learning as the result of naturalistic use of language.
    [Show full text]
  • Aurora Tsai's Review of the Diagnosis of Reading in a Second Or Foreign
    Reading in a Foreign Language April 2015, Volume 27, No. 1 ISSN 1539-0578 pp. 117–121 Reviewed work: The Diagnosis of Reading in a Second or Foreign Language. (2015). Alderson, C., Haapakangas, E., Huhta, A., Nieminen, L., & Ullakonoja, R. New York and London: Routledge. Pp. 265. ISBN 978-0-415-66290-1 (paperback). $49.95 Reviewed by Aurora Tsai Carnegie Mellon University United States http://www.amazon.com In The Diagnosis of Reading in a Second or Foreign Language, Charles Alderson, Eeva-Leena Haapakangas, Ari Huhta, Lea Nieminen, and Riikka Ullakonoja discuss prominent theories concerning the diagnosis of reading in a second or foreign language (SFL). Until now, the area of diagnosis in SFL reading has received little attention, despite its increasing importance as the number of second language learners continues to grow across the world. As the authors point out, researchers have not yet established a theory of how SFL diagnosis works, which makes it difficult to establish reliable procedures for accurately diagnosing and helping students in need. In this important contribution to reading and diagnostic research, Alderson et al. illustrate the challenges involved in carrying out diagnostic procedures, conceptualize a theory of diagnosis, provide an overview of SFL reading, and highlight important factors to consider in diagnostic assessment. Moreover, they provide detailed examples of tests developed specifically for diagnosis, most of which arise from their most current research projects. Because this book covers a wide variety of SFL reading and diagnostic topics, researchers in applied linguistics, second language acquisition, language assessment, education, and even governmental organizations or military departments would consider it an enormously helpful and enlightening resource on SFL reading.
    [Show full text]
  • Essentials of Language Typology
    Lívia Körtvélyessy Essentials of Language Typology KOŠICE 2017 © Lívia Körtvélyessy, Katedra anglistiky a amerikanistiky, Filozofická fakulta UPJŠ v Košiciach Recenzenti: Doc. PhDr. Edita Kominarecová, PhD. Doc. Slávka Tomaščíková, PhD. Elektronický vysokoškolský učebný text pre Filozofickú fakultu UPJŠ v Košiciach. Všetky práva vyhradené. Toto dielo ani jeho žiadnu časť nemožno reprodukovať,ukladať do informačných systémov alebo inak rozširovať bez súhlasu majiteľov práv. Za odbornú a jazykovú stánku tejto publikácie zodpovedá autor. Rukopis prešiel redakčnou a jazykovou úpravou. Jazyková úprava: Steve Pepper Vydavateľ: Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika v Košiciach Umiestnenie: http://unibook.upjs.sk Dostupné od: február 2017 ISBN: 978-80-8152-480-6 Table of Contents Table of Contents i List of Figures iv List of Tables v List of Abbreviations vi Preface vii CHAPTER 1 What is language typology? 1 Tasks 10 Summary 13 CHAPTER 2 The forerunners of language typology 14 Rasmus Rask (1787 - 1832) 14 Franz Bopp (1791 – 1867) 15 Jacob Grimm (1785 - 1863) 15 A.W. Schlegel (1767 - 1845) and F. W. Schlegel (1772 - 1829) 17 Wilhelm von Humboldt (1767 – 1835) 17 August Schleicher 18 Neogrammarians (Junggrammatiker) 19 The name for a new linguistic field 20 Tasks 21 Summary 22 CHAPTER 3 Genealogical classification of languages 23 Tasks 28 Summary 32 CHAPTER 4 Phonological typology 33 Consonants and vowels 34 Syllables 36 Prosodic features 36 Tasks 38 Summary 40 CHAPTER 5 Morphological typology 41 Morphological classification of languages (holistic
    [Show full text]