DOCSLIB.ORG

AAFP Chronic Pain Toolkit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AAFP Chronic Pain Toolkit AAFP Chronic Pain Toolkit PAIN ASSESSMENT | Section 1 OVERVIEW Assessment of chronic pain should be multidimensional. Consideration should be given to several domains, including the physiological features of pain and its contributing factors, with physicians and other clinicians assessing patients for function, quality of life, mental health, and emotional health. In addition to a complete medical and medication history typically obtained at an office visit, documentation should be obtained about pain intensity, location, duration, and factors that aggravate or alleviate pain. A physical exam should include musculoskeletal and neurological components, as appropriate. Diagnostic testing and imaging may also be considered for some types of chronic pain. Many organizations, including the AAFP, recommend against imaging for low back pain within the first six weeks of treatment unless there are reasons for the imaging. These reasons may include concerns of underlying conditions, such as severe or progressive neurological deficits, or if osteomyelitis is suspected.1 Periodic reassessments of chronic pain and treatment should focus on evaluating improvements in physical health; mental and emotional health; progress towards functional treatment goals; and effectiveness and tolerability of medications for chronic pain treatment. Currently, there are no universally adopted guidelines or recommendations for assessment of chronic pain. The use of appropriate assessment tools can assist in diagnostic assessment, management, reassessment, and monitoring of treatment effects. Multiple tools are available, with many embedded in electronic health record (EHR) systems. Pain Assessment Tools The table on the next page includes selected tools for pain assessment included in this toolkit, along with links and reference to additional tools. Assessments about other relevant domains are covered in Functional and Other Assessments (Section 2). 2 AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS AAFP Chronic Pain Toolkit Pain Assessment Tools in Toolkit Name Use Scoring Description Location Brief Pain Assess pain severity • Worst pain score: 1-4 = mild pain Fillable PDF completed in Jump to tool in toolkit. Inventory and impact on daily • Worst pain score: 5-6 = moderate pain approximately five minutes (BPI) Short function • Worst pain score: 7-10 = severe pain with the patient Form Pain severity can be calculated by averaging responses of questions 3-6. Pain interference can be calculated by averaging responses of questions 9a-9g. Pain, Assess pain • Mild pain = 0-11 or 0 to <4 Three-question assessment Jump to tool in toolkit. Enjoyment interference with • Moderate pain = 12-20 or 4 to <7 of pain takes 1-2 minutes of Life and enjoyment of life and • Severe pain = 21-30 or 7-10 General general activity Activity PEG score is calculated by an average of (PEG) Scale questions 1-3 Additional Pain Assessment Tools Numeric Pain Rate pain intensity Scores range from 0-10 points, with Evaluates one aspect of www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/ Rating Scale higher scores indicating greater pain pain—intensity numeric-pain-rating-scale (NPRS)2 intensity. Evaluates pain experienced only in the past 24 hours or “an average pain intensity” Verbal Rating Describe pain intensity • No pain Word options describe pain www.oxfordclinicalpsych.com/view/10.1093/ Scale (VRS)3 • Mild pain intensity med:psych/9780199772377.001.0001/med- Use when the NPRS • Moderate pain 9780199772377-interactive-pdf-003.pdf cannot be used • Severe pain Wong-Baker Describe pain intensity Series of faces range from 0 for a happy Faces depict the pain the https://wongbakerfaces.org/ FACES® Pain face (no hurt) to 10 for a crying face patient experiences Rating Scale4 Used for children and (hurts worst) adults Evaluates one aspect of pain—intensity McGill Pain Assess quality and Scores are calculated by summing values Numerical intensity scale www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/ Questionnaire intensity of pain associated with each word mcgill-pain-questionnaire (MPQ)5 Set of descriptor words Monitor pain over Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 78 and a pain drawing time and determine (severe pain) effectiveness of interventions For additional resources on assessment algorithms, visit the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement’s guideline, Pain; Assessment, Non-Opioid Treatment Approaches and Opioid Management. References 1. American Academy of Family Physicians. Imagining for low back pain. Choosing Wisely®. Accessed January 7, 2021. www.aafp.org/family-physician/patient- care/clinical-recommendations/all-clinical-recommendations/cw-back-pain.html 2. Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Accessed January 7, 2021. www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/numeric-pain-rating-scale 3. Jensen MP. The 0-3 Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). Accessed January 7, 2021. www.oxfordclinicalpsych.com/view/10.1093/med:psych/9780199772377.001.0001/ med-9780199772377-interactive-pdf-003.pdf 4. Wong-Baker FACES Foundation (2020). Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale. Accessed January 7, 2021. https://wongbakerfaces.org/ 5. Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. McGill Pain Questionnaire. Accessed January 7, 2021. www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/mcgill-pain-questionnaire 3 AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS AAFP Chronic Pain Toolkit Chronic Pain Management Brief Pain Inventory Toolkit ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ £ ¦ § ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ © ¥ ¡ ¦ § ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ £ § ¡ ! § ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ! § " ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ # # ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨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` Y a b c d U VW X Y Z [ \Y Z [ \Y U VW X Y e 2 S := B > = 5 B 9 = J 6 7 5 D B ; E f J G ; 5 G : ; E 8 9 4 = 6 E = E 7 @ f = 5 9 4 B 9 f = > 9 C = > G 5 ; f = > J 6 7 5 D B ; E B 9 ;9 > R 6 5 > 9 ; E 9 4 = :B > 9 O g 4 6 7 5 > 2 h 1 O e g i j k l m 1 h n o p q r s q t u q v q t o x y q s r z q { r s | p q r s w g 2 S := B > = 5 B 9 = J 6 7 5 D B ; E f J G ; 5 G : ; E 8 9 4 = 6 E = E 7 @ f = 5 9 4 B 9 f = > 9 C = > G 5 ; f = > J 6 7 5 D B ; E B 9 ;9 > := B > 9 ; E 9 4 = :B > 9 O g 4 6 7 5 > 2 h 1 O e g i j k l m 1 h n o p q r s q t u q v q t o x y q s r z q { r s | p q r s w i 2 S := B > = 5 B 9 = J 6 7 5 D B ; E f J G ; 5 G : ; E 8 9 4 = 6 E = E 7 @ f = 5 9 4 B 9 f = > 9 C = > G 5 ; f = > J 6 7 5 D B ; E 6 E 9 4 = B < = 5 B 8 = 2 h 1 O e g i j k l m 1 h n o p q r s q t u q v q t o x y q s r z q { r s | p q r s w j 2 S := B > = 5 B 9 = J 6 7 5 D B ; E f J G ; 5 G : ; E 8 9 4 = 6 E = E 7 @ f = 5 9 4 B 9 9 = : :> 4 6 R @ 7 G 4 D B ; E J 6 7 4 B < = 5 ;8 4 9 E 6 R 2 h 1 O e g i j k l m 1 h n o p q r s q t u q v q t o x y q s r z q { r s | p q r s w S B 8 = 1 6 A O Used by permission of Charles S. Cleeland, PhD., Pain Research Group Copyright © 2021. All rights reserved. HOP 20012003 4 AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS AAFP Chronic Pain Toolkit Brief Pain Inventory, page 2 © ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ £ ¦ § ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¥ ¡ ¦ § £ § ¡ ! § ¨ ¨ ¨ # ¨ ¨ ¨ # ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ! § " ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # $ % & ' ( ) * & ' + ) , , - . / 0 )' ) % - k 2 } 4 B 9 9 5 = B 9 @ = E 9 > 6 5 @ = C ;G B 9 ;6 E > B 5 = J 6 7 5 = G = ;< ; E 8 A 6 5 J 6 7 5 D B ; E M l 2 ~ E 9 4 = :B > 9 O g 4 6 7 5 > ? 4 6 R @ 7 G 4 5 = : ;= A 4 B < = D B ; E 9 5 = B 9 @ = E 9 > 6 5 @ = C ;G B 9 ;6 E > D 5 6 < ;C = C M S := B > = G ; 5 G := 9 4 = 6 E = D = 5 G = E 9 B 8 = 9 4 B 9 @ 6 > 9 > 4 6 R > 4 6 R @ 7 G 4 5 = : ;= A J 6 7 4 B < = 5 = G = ;< = C 2 h 1 h O h e h g h i h j h k h l h m h 1 h h n o o z | | | r | | r | m 2 ; 5 G := 9 4 = 6 E = E 7 @ f = 5 9 4 B 9 C = > G 5 ; f = > 4 6 R ? C 7 5 ; E 8 9 4 = D B > 9 O g 4 6 7 5 > ? D B ; E 4 B > ; E 9 = 5 A = 5 = C R ;9 4 J 6 7 5 2 = E = 5 B : G 9 ;< ;9 J h 1 O e g i j k l m 1 h o | t s o o z | | w s | | | s | | | t 2 6 6 C h 1 O e g i j k l m 1 h o | t s o o z | | w s | | | s | | | t 2 } B : L ; E 8 f ; : ;9 J h 1 O e g i j k l m 1 h o | t s o o z | | w s | | | s | | | t 2 P 6 5 @ B : } 6 5 L F ; E G : 7 C = > f 6 9 4 R 6 5 L 6 7 9 > ;C = 9 4 = 4 6 @ = B E C 4 6 7 > = R 6 5 L H h 1 O e g i j k l m 1 h o | t s o o z | | w s | | | s | | | t 2 = :B 9 ;6 E > R ;9 4 6 9 4 = 5 D = 6 D := h 1 O e g i j k l m 1 h o | t s o o z | | w s | | | s | | | t 2 := = D h 1 O e g i j k l m 1 h o | t s o o z | | w s | | | s | | | t 2 E 6 J @ = E 9 6 A : ;A = h 1 O e g i j k l m 1 h o | t s o o z | | w s | | | s | | | t ¡¢ £ ¤ ¥ ¡¢ ¢ ¡ ¦ § ¨ © ª © ¦ « ¢ £ ¢ ¬ ­ ® ¡¡ £ ¢ £ ¢ ° ¢ § ¯ S B 8 = O 6 A O Used by permission of Charles S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Opioid-Induced Hyperalgesia in Humans Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Considerations
    SPECIAL TOPIC SERIES Opioid-induced Hyperalgesia in Humans Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Considerations Larry F. Chu, MD, MS (BCHM), MS (Epidemiology),* Martin S. Angst, MD,* and David Clark, MD, PhD*w treatment of acute and cancer-related pain. However, Abstract: Opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) is most broadly recent evidence suggests that opioid medications may also defined as a state of nociceptive sensitization caused by exposure be useful for the treatment of chronic noncancer pain, at to opioids. The state is characterized by a paradoxical response least in the short term.3–14 whereby a patient receiving opioids for the treatment of pain Perhaps because of this new evidence, opioid may actually become more sensitive to certain painful stimuli. medications have been increasingly prescribed by primary The type of pain experienced may or may not be different from care physicians and other patient care providers for the original underlying painful condition. Although the precise chronic painful conditions.15,16 Indeed, opioids are molecular mechanism is not yet understood, it is generally among the most common medications prescribed by thought to result from neuroplastic changes in the peripheral physicians in the United States17 and accounted for 235 and central nervous systems that lead to sensitization of million prescriptions in the year 2004.18 pronociceptive pathways. OIH seems to be a distinct, definable, One of the principal factors that differentiate the use and characteristic phenomenon that may explain loss of opioid of opioids for the treatment of pain concerns the duration efficacy in some cases. Clinicians should suspect expression of of intended use.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidline for the Evidence-Informed Primary Care Management of Low Back Pain
    Guideline for the Evidence-Informed Primary Care Management of Low Back Pain 2nd Edition These recommendations are systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances. They should be used as an adjunct to sound clinical decision making. Guideline Disease/Condition(s) Targeted Specifications Acute and sub-acute low back pain Chronic low back pain Acute and sub-acute sciatica/radiculopathy Chronic sciatica/radiculopathy Category Prevention Diagnosis Evaluation Management Treatment Intended Users Primary health care providers, for example: family physicians, osteopathic physicians, chiro- practors, physical therapists, occupational therapists, nurses, pharmacists, psychologists. Purpose To help Alberta clinicians make evidence-informed decisions about care of patients with non- specific low back pain. Objectives • To increase the use of evidence-informed conservative approaches to the prevention, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment in primary care patients with low back pain • To promote appropriate specialist referrals and use of diagnostic tests in patients with low back pain • To encourage patients to engage in appropriate self-care activities Target Population Adult patients 18 years or older in primary care settings. Exclusions: pregnant women; patients under the age of 18 years; diagnosis or treatment of specific causes of low back pain such as: inpatient treatments (surgical treatments); referred pain (from abdomen, kidney, ovary, pelvis,
    [Show full text]
  • Headache and Chronic Pain in Primary Care
    FAMILY PRACTICE GRAND ROUNDS Headache and Chronic Pain in Primary Care Thomas Greer, MD, MPH, Wayne Katon, MD, Noel Chrisman, PhD, Stephen Butler, MD, Dee Caplan-Tuke, MSW Seattle, W a s h in g t o n R. THOMAS GREER (Assistant Professor, Depart­ automobile accident while vacationing in another state Dment of Family Medicine): The management of pa­ and suffered multiple contusions and rib fractures. Oral tients with chronic headaches is difficult and often a source methadone had been prescribed at her second clinic visit of discord between the patient and his or her physician. when other oral narcotics failed to control her pain. She The patient with chronic headaches presented in this con­ also had a long history of visits for headaches, treated with ference illustrates most of the common problems encoun­ injections of a narcotic, usually meperidine, and oral co­ tered in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pa­ deine. tients with other kinds of chronic pain as well. As her acute injuries healed and she was tapered off the methadone, her chronic headaches emerged as a signifi­ cant problem. Within a few months the patient was reg­ EPIDEMIOLOGY ularly requesting oral codeine for the management of her severe, intractable headaches. More than 40 million Americans consult physicians each In early September she was brought to our emergency year for complaints of headache.1 The National Ambu­ department by ambulance following an apparent seizure. latory Medical Care Survey, which gathered information Witnesses reported that the patient had “jerking move­ on approximately 90,000 patient visits to a nationally ments.” There was no incontinence; and the ambulance representative sample of physicians, determined that personnel found the patient to be irritable and disoriented headache was the second most common chronic pain but with stable vital signs.
    [Show full text]
  • Pain Management in People Who Have OUD; Acute Vs. Chronic Pain
    Pain Management in People Who Have OUD; Acute vs. Chronic Pain Developer: Stephen A. Wyatt, DO Medical Director, Addiction Medicine Carolinas HealthCare System Reviewer/Editor: Miriam Komaromy, MD, The ECHO Institute™ This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under contract number HHSH250201600015C. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government. Disclosures Stephen Wyatt has nothing to disclose Objectives • Understand the complexities of treating acute and chronic pain in patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). • Understand the various approaches to treating the OUD patient on an agonist medication for acute or chronic pain. • Understand how acute and chronic pain can be treated when the OUD patient is on an antagonist medication. Speaker Notes: The general Outline of the module is to first address the difficulties surrounding treating pain in the opioid dependent patient. Then to address the ways that patients with pain can be approached on either an agonist of antagonist opioid use disorder treatment. Pain and Substance Use Disorder • Potential for mutual mistrust: – Provider • drug seeking • dependency/intolerance • fear – Patient • lack of empathy • avoidance • fear Speaker Notes: It is the provider that needs to be well educated and skillful in working with this population. Through a better understanding of opioid use disorders as a disease, the prejudice surrounding the encounter with the patient may be reduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Pain Management Assessment and Reassessment
    North Shore-LIJ Health System is now Northwell Health System Patient Care Services POLICY TITLE: CLINICAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE Pain Management: Assessment and MANUAL Reassessment POLICY #: PCS.1603 CATEGORY SECTION: System Approval Date: 10/20/16 Effective Date: NEW Site Implementation Date: 12/2/16 Last Reviewed/Revised: NEW Prepared by: Notations: System Nursing Policy and Procedure This policy was created by incorporating the Committee Northwell Health’s Geriatric Guidelines for Pain Management into the Northwell Health’s Pain Management : Assessment and Reassessment Policy dated 11/10 that can be found on the Intranet. GENERAL STATEMENT of PURPOSE To establish a standard for routine assessment, reassessment and documentation of pain as appropriate to the patient’s condition and treatment regimen. POLICY 1. Patients are screened and assessed for pain based upon clinical presentation, services sought, and in accordance with the care, treatment, and services provided. Facility personnel use methods to assess pain that are consistent with the patient’s age, condition, and ability to understand. 2. If the patient reports pain to a health care worker other than a licensed health care provider, the health care worker will escalate the report of pain to a licensed health care provider for assessment. 3. Pain assessment performed by health care providers will address individual, cultural, spiritual, and language differences. Pain measurement scales are available in various languages and, if necessary, access to a medical interpreter will be provided to assist in the evaluation of the patient’s pain. 4. The patient’s self-report of pain is considered the “gold standard.” For those patients who are unable to communicate the health care provider will assess pain by using the appropriate pain Measurement Scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Pain
    ASSESSMENT OF PAIN Pediatric Pain Resource Nurse Curriculum © 2017 Renee CB Manworren, PhD, APRN, FAAN and Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago. All rights reserved. Objectives • Critically evaluate pain assessment tools for reliability, validity, feasibility and utility Table of Contents for communicating pediatric patients’ pain experiences • Formulate processes and policies to ensure the organization’s pain assessment and care planning for pediatric patients is sensitive to children’s pain by acknowledging the sensory, cognitive and affective experience of pain and behavioral responses as influenced by social, cultural, spiritual and regulatory context. • Engage in pain assessment demonstrating evidence-based processes, modeling assessment principles, and using valid and reliable tools that are appropriate for the developmental level, cognitive ability, language, and care needs of pediatric patients cared for in your clinical area. page page page page page 3 8 15 17 30 Why Assess Pain in Principles of Pain Pain Assessment Process Initial Assessment Choosing Pain Children? Assessment Assessment Tools page page page page page 35 48 56 63 66 Pain Assessment Tools Assessment of Those Special Populations In Summary References for Self-report Unable to Self-report | 2 Why Assess Pain in Children? Why do you think it is Type your answer here. important to screen for and assess pain in children? | 4 Because… Assessment and treatment of pain is a fundamental human right. Declaration of Montreal , The International Association for the Study of Pain., 2011 Pain in children occurs across a spectrum of conditions including everyday pains, acute injuries and medical events, recurrent or chronic pain, and pain related to chronic or life-limiting conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Perioperative Pain Management for the Chronic Pain Patient with Long-Term Opioid Use
    1.5 ANCC Contact Hours Perioperative Pain Management for the Chronic Pain Patient With Long-Term Opioid Use Carina Jackman In the United States nearly one in four patients present- patterns of preoperative opioid use. Approximately one ing for surgery reports current opioid use. Many of these in four patients undergoing surgery in the study re- patients suffer from chronic pain disorders and opioid ported preoperative opioid use (23.1% of the 34,186-pa- tolerance or dependence. Opioid tolerance and preexisting tient study population). Opioid use was most common chronic pain disorders present unique challenges in regard in patients undergoing orthopaedic spinal surgery to postoperative pain management. These patients benefi t (65%). This was followed by neurosurgical spinal sur- geries (55.1%). Hydrocodone bitartrate was the most from providers who are not only familiar with multimodal prevalent medication. Tramadol and oxycodone hydro- pain management and skilled in the assessment of acute pain, chloride were also common ( Hilliard et al., 2018 ). but also empathetic to their specifi c struggles. Chronic pain Given this signifi cant population of surgical patients patients often face stigmas surrounding their opioid use, with established opioid use, it is imperative for both and this may lead to underestimation and undertreatment nurses and all other providers to gain an understanding of their pain. This article aims to review the challenges of the complex challenges chronic pain patients intro- presented by these complex patients and provide strate- duce to the postoperative setting. gies for treating acute postoperative pain in opioid-tolerant patients. Defi nitions Common pain terminology as defined by the Chronic Pain and Long-Term International Association for the Study of Pain, a joint Opioid Use consensus statement by the American Society of Addiction Medicine, the American Academy of Pain The burden of chronic pain in the United States is stag- Medicine and the American Pain Society (2001 ), and the gering.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanical Low Back Pain Joshua Scott Will, DO; ​David C
    Mechanical Low Back Pain Joshua Scott Will, DO; David C. Bury, DO; and John A. Miller, DPT Martin Army Community Hospital, Fort Benning, Georgia Low back pain is usually nonspecific or mechanical. Mechanical low back pain arises intrinsically from the spine, interverte- bral disks, or surrounding soft tissues. Clinical clues, or red flags, may help identify cases of nonmechanical low back pain and prompt further evaluation or imaging. Red flags include progressive motor or sensory loss, new urinary retention or overflow incontinence, history of cancer, recent invasive spinal procedure, and significant trauma relative to age. Imaging on initial presentation should be reserved for when there is suspicion for cauda equina syndrome, malignancy, fracture, or infection. Plain radiography of the lumbar spine is appropriate to assess for fracture and bony abnormality, whereas magnetic resonance imaging is better for identifying the source of neurologic or soft tissue abnormalities. There are multiple treatment modalities for mechanical low back pain, but strong evidence of benefit is often lacking. Moderate evidence supports the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, and topiramate in the short-term treatment of mechanical low back pain. There is little or no evidence of benefit for acetamin- ophen, antidepressants (except duloxetine), skeletal muscle relaxants, lidocaine patches, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the treatment of chronic low back pain. There is strong evidence for short-term effectiveness and moderate-quality evidence for long-term effectiveness of yoga in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Various spinal manipulative techniques (osteopathic manipulative treatment, spinal manipulative therapy) have shown mixed benefits in the acute and chronic setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronic Pelvic Pain & Pelvic Floor Myalgia Updated
    Welcome to the chronic pelvic pain and pelvic floor myalgia lecture. My name is Dr. Maria Giroux. I am an Obstetrics and Gynecology resident interested in urogynecology. This lecture was created with Dr. Rashmi Bhargava and Dr. Huse Kamencic, who are gynecologists, and Suzanne Funk, a pelvic floor physiotherapist in Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada. We designed a multidisciplinary training program for teaching the assessment of the pelvic floor musculature to identify a possible muscular cause or contribution to chronic pelvic pain and provide early referral for appropriate treatment. We then performed a randomized trial to compare the effectiveness of hands-on vs video-based training methods. The results of this research study will be presented at the AUGS/IUGA Joint Scientific Meeting in Nashville in September 2019. We found both hands-on and video-based training methods are effective. There was no difference in the degree of improvement in assessment scores between the 2 methods. Participants found the training program to be useful for clinical practice. For both versions, we have designed a ”Guide to the Assessment of the Pelvic Floor Musculature,” which are cards with the anatomy of the pelvic floor and step-by step instructions of how to perform the assessment. In this lecture, we present the video-based training program. We have also created a workshop for the hands-on version. For more information about our research and workshop, please visit the website below. This lecture is designed for residents, fellows, general gynecologists,
    [Show full text]
  • Pain Assessment and Documentation (Adult)
    Department: PATIENT CARE Policy/Procedure: PAIN ASSESSMENT AND DOCUMENTATION (ADULT) Refer to policy MC.E.48 for neonatal to pediatric pain assessment and management. Definition: Pain can be described as an unpleasant sensory or emotional experience associated with actual and potential tissue damage, disease, trauma, surgery or certain therapeutic procedures. Policy: 1. Patients and their families shall be educated and informed that pain management is an important part of their care. Education should include pain assessment process, pain plan of care, and the importance of effective pain management 2. Each patient shall have the right to pain management through assessment, intervention and reassessment. Each patient has the right to expect his/her report of pain to be accepted, to have the pain assessed and reassessed, to have interventions provided and to achieve and maintain an optimal level of pain relief. The patient's self-report will be the primary means to determining pain. Torrance Memorial Medical Center (TMMC) employees shall assess and report the patients' pain across the continuum and intervene, as appropriate. 3. Ability to understand pain shall be assessed using an age or condition specific assessment tool. See Appendix B and C. 4. Pain assessments: a. A comprehensive pain assessment will be performed during the admission process and will include: a physical examination, patient’s acceptable level of pain, pain history (including acute and chronic pain identification and assessment), medication, and non-medication pain interventions used at home or in the past. b. A routine pain assessment will include time, intensity of pain (level of pain) or behavior scale score, quality of pain (pain type) and location.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronic Low Back Pain: Evaluation and Management ALLEN R
    Chronic Low Back Pain: Evaluation and Management ALLEN R. LAST, MD, MPH, and KAREN HULBERT, MD, Racine Family Medicine Residency Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Racine, Wisconsin Chronic low back pain is a common problem in primary care. A history and physical exami- nation should place patients into one of several categories: (1) nonspecific low back pain; (2) back pain associated with radiculopathy or spinal stenosis; (3) back pain referred from a nonspinal source; or (4) back pain associated with another specific spinal cause. For patients who have back pain associated with radiculopathy, spinal stenosis, or another specific spinal cause, magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography may establish the diagnosis and guide management. Because evidence of improved outcomes is lacking, lumbar spine radiog- raphy should be delayed for at least one to two months in patients with nonspecific pain. Acet- aminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are first-line medications for chronic low back pain. Tramadol, opioids, and other adjunctive medications may benefit some patients who do not respond to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Acupuncture, exercise therapy, multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs, massage, behavior therapy, and spinal manipula- tion are effective in certain clinical situations. Patients with radicular symptoms may benefit from epidural steroid injections, but studies have produced mixed results. Most patients with chronic low back pain will not benefit from surgery. A surgical evaluation may be
    [Show full text]
  • To Ease Pain and Suffering Is Simply Divine
    The Essentials of Pain Management Presenter JoAnne M. Skillman, FNP-C, MSN, RN Pain/Palliative Care Specialist Christiana Care Health System TO EASE PAIN AND SUFFERING IS SIMPLY DIVINE Joanne Skillman FNP-C,MSN,RN Objectives • Describe the classifications of pain. • Perform initial and ongoing pain assessment. • Describe WHO organization standards by selecting step one, two and three agents for different patient conditions. • Assess and recognize the potential for somatic, visceral, and neuropathic pain. • Understand the difference between addiction and tolerance. 1 Pain management is comprised of initial and ongoing assessment of pain, implementation of appropriate interventions to relieve pain, and measurement of outcomes. What is Pain? Pain is described as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage.” Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States, Inc. Model Guidelines for the Use of Controlled Substances for the Treatment of Pain. Euless, TX: 1998) What is Pain? • Pain is “Whatever the experiencing person says it is, existing whenever he says it does.” • There is only one pain that is easy to bear: it is the pain of others. (Leriche, 1939,p.24) • Pain is a nursing diagnosis. 2 A Vicious Cycle • Unrelieved pain leads to anxiety Depression and depression. Pain Anxiety The Gold Standard • The clinician must accept the patient’s report of pain. • The single most reliable indicator of the existence and intensity of pain, and any resultant distress, is the patient’s self report. JACHO Says . “The management of pain is appropriate for all patients, not just the dying patient.
    [Show full text]