DOCSLIB.ORG

How Reproducible Are Surface Areas Calculated from the BET Equation?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How Reproducible Are Surface Areas Calculated from the BET Equation? 1 How reproducible are surface areas calculated from the BET 2 equation? 3 Johannes W. M. Osterrietha, James Rampersada, David Maddena, Nakul Rampala, Luka Skoricb, 4 Bethany Connollya; Mark D. Allendorfc, Vitalie Stavilac, Jonathan L. Sniderc; Rob Amelootd, João 5 Marreirosd; Conchi Aniae; Diana Azevedof, Enrique Vilarrasa-Garciaf, Bianca F. Santosf; Xian-He 6 Bug, Xe Zangg; Hana Bunzenh; Neil R. Champnessi, Sarah L. Griffini; Banglin Chenj, Rui-Biao Linj; 7 Benoit Coasnek; Seth Cohenl, Jessica C. Moretonl; Yamil J. Colonm; Linjiang Chenn, Rob Clowesn; 8 François-Xavier Couderto; Yong Cuip, Bang Houp; Deanna M. D’Alessandroq, Patrick W. Dohenyq; 9 Mircea Dincăr, Chenyue Sunr; Christian Doonans, Michael Thomas Huxleys; Jack D. Evanst; Paolo 10 Falcarou, Raffaele Riccou; Omar Farhav, Karam B. Idreesv, Timur Islamogluv; Pingyun Fengw, 11 Huajun Yangw; Ross S. Forganx, Dominic Barax; Shuhei Furukaway, Eli Sanchezy; Jorge Gasconz, 12 Selvedin Telalovicz; Sujit K. Ghoshaa, Soumya Mukherjeeaa; Matthew R. Hillab, Muhammad Munir 13 Sadiqab; Patricia Horcajadaac, Pablo Salcedo-Abrairaac; Katsumi Kanekoad, Radovan Kukobatad; 14 Jeff Kenvinae; Seda Keskinaf; Susumu Kitagawaag, Kenichi Otakeag; Ryan P. Livelyah, Stephen J. A. 15 DeWittah; Phillip Llewellynaj; Bettina V. Lotschaj,ak, Sebastian T. Emmerlingaj,ak, Alexander M. 16 Pützaj,ak; Carlos Martí-Gastaldoal, Natalia M. Padialal; Javier García-Martínezam, Noemi Linaresam; 17 Daniel Maspochan,ao, Jose A. Suárez del Pinoao; Peyman Moghadamap, Rama Oktavianap; Russel 18 E. Morrisaq, Paul S. Wheatleyaq; Jorge Navarroar; Camille Petitas, David Danacias; Matthew J. 19 Rosseinskyat, Alexandros P. Katsoulidisat; Martin Schröderau, Xue Hanau, Sihai Yangau; Christian 20 Serreav, Georges Mouchahamav; David S. Shollah, Raghuram Thyagarajanah; Daniel Sideriusψ,φ,aw; 21 Randall Q. Snurrax, Rebecca B. Goncalvesay; Shane G. Telferaz, Seok J. Leeaz; Valeska P. Tinba, 22 Jemma L. Rowlandsonba; Takashi Uemurabb, Tomoya Iiyukabb; Monique A. van der Veenbc, Davide 23 Regabc; Veronique Van Speybroeckbd, Sven M. J. Roggebd, Aran Lamairebd; Krista S. Waltonah, 24 Lukas W. Bingelah; Stefan Wuttkebe,bf, Jacopo Andreobe,bf; Omar Yaghibg,bh, Bing Zhangbg; Cafer T. 25 Yavuzbi, Thien S. Nguyenbi; Felix Zamorabj, Carmen Montorobj; Hongcai Zhoubk, Angelo Kirchonbk; 26 and David Fairen-Jimeneza,* 27 28 a Adsorption & Advanced Materials Laboratory (A2ML), Department of Chemical Engineering & Biotechnology, 29 University of Cambridge, Philippa Fawcett Drive, Cambridge CB3 0AS, UK 30 b Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, JJ Thomson Avenue, CB3 0HE, Cambridge, United 31 Kingdom 32 c Sandia National Laboratories, 7011 East Avenue, Livermore, California 94550, United States 33 d cMACS, Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems (M²S), KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium 34 e CEMHTI, CNRS (UPR 3079), Université d’Orléans, 45071 Orléans, France 35 f LPACO2/GPSA, Department of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, 60455-760 Fortaleza 36 (CE), Brazil 37 g School of Materials Science and Engineering, National Institute for Advanced Materials, Nankai University, 38 Tianjin 300350, China 1 39 h Chair of Solid State and Materials Chemistry, Institute of Physics, University of Augsburg, 40 Universitaetsstrasse 1, Augsburg 86159, Germany 41 I School of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK 42 j Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249- 43 0698, USA 44 k Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LIPhy, 38000 Grenoble, France 45 l Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093 46 USA 47 m Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, 48 USA 49 n Leverhulme Research Centre for Functional Materials Design, Materials Innovation Factory and Department 50 of Chemistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK 51 o Chimie ParisTech, PSL University, CNRS, Institut de Recherche de Chimie Paris, 75005 Paris, France 52 p School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, 53 Minhang District, Shanghai 54 q School of Chemistry, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia 55 r Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA 56 s Centre for Advanced Nanomaterials and Department of Chemistry, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, 57 Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia 58 t Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Technische Universität Dresden, Bergstrasse 66, 01062, Dresden, 59 Germany 60 u Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria 61 v Department of Chemistry and International Institute of Nanotechnology, Northwestern University, 2145 62 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States 63 w Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA 64 x WestCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK 65 y Institute for Integrated Cell-Material Sciences, Kyoto University, Yoshida, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan 66 z KAUST Catalysis Center (KCC), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, P.O.Box 4700, 23955- 67 6900, Thuwal-Jeddah, Kingdom od Saudi Arabia 68 aa Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune, Dr. Homi 69 Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune 411008, India 70 ab CSIRO, Private Bag 33, Clayton South MDC, VIC 3169, Australia and Department of Chemical Engineering, 71 Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia 72 ac Advanced Porous Materials Unit (APMU), IMDEA Energy, Avda. Ramón de la Sagra 3, E-28935 Móstoles, 73 Madrid, Spain 74 ad Research Initiative for Supra-Materials, Shinshu University, Nagano, Japan 75 ae Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, Norcross, GA 30093, USA 76 af Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Koc University, Rumelifeneri Yolu 34450 Sariyer, 77 Istanbul, Turkey 78 ag Institute for Integrated Cell-Material Sciences (WPI-iCeMS), Kyoto University Institute for Advanced Study 79 (KUIAS), Kyoto University, Yoshida Ushinomiya-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan 80 ah School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA 2 81 ai CNRS / Aix-Marseille Univ. / TOTAL 82 aj Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research, Heisenbergstrasse 1, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany 83 ak Department of Chemistry, University of Munich (LMU), Butenandtstrasse 5-13, 81377 Munich, Germany 84 al Instituto de Ciencia Molecular (ICMol), Universitat de València, Paterna 46980, València, Spain 85 am Laboratorio de Nanotecnología Molecular, Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Universidad de Alicante, 86 Ctra. San Vicente-Alicante s/n, E-03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain 87 an ICREA, Pg. Lluís Companys 23, Barcelona, 08010, Spain 88 ao Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), CSIC and the Barcelona Institute of Science 89 and Technology. Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain 90 ap Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK 91 aq School of Chemistry, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9ST, UK 92 ar Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain 93 as Barrer Centre, Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, U.K., SW7 2AZ 94 at Materials Innovation Factory, Department of Chemistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L7 3NY, UK 95 au School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K. M13 9PL 96 av Institut des Matériaux Poreux de Paris, Ecole Normale Supérieure, ESPCI Paris, CNRS, PSL University, 97 75005 Paris, France 98 aw Chemical Sciences Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland USA 99 20899-8320 100 ax Departments of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, 101 Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA 102 ay Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA 103 az MacDiarmid Institute of Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, School of Fundamental Sciences, Massey 104 University, Palmerston North, New Zealand 105 ba Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TR, U.K. 106 bb Department of Advanced Materials Science, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 107 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8561, Japan 108 bc Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, 2629HZ Delft, 109 the Netherlands 110 bd Center for Molecular Modeling (CMM), Ghent University, Technologiepark 46, B-9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium 111 be BCMaterials, Basque Center for Materials, Applications and Nanostructures, UPV/EHU Science Park, 112 48940, Leioa, Spain 113 bf IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48009, Bilbao, Spain 114 bg Department of Chemistry, University of California—Berkeley; Kavli Energy Nanoscience Institute at UC 115 Berkeley 116 bh Berkeley Global Science Institute, Berkeley, California 94720, United States 117 bi Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and 118 Technology (KAIST), Yuseong-gu, 34141 Daejeon, Korea 119 bj Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain 120 bk Chemistry Department -Texas A&M University 121 ψ Official contribution of the National
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Use of Nitrogen Adsorption for the Characterisation of Porous Materials
    Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 187–188 (2001) 3–9 www.elsevier.nl/locate/colsurfa Review The use of nitrogen adsorption for the characterisation of porous materials Kenneth Sing * School of Chemistry, Bristol Uni6ersity, Bristol, UK Abstract Problems, which may arise when low-temperature nitrogen adsorption is used for the characterisation of porous materials, are discussed in this review. Continuous or discontinuous manometric techniques can be employed for nitrogen adsorption measurements at 77 K. For pore structure analysis, the nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms should be determined over the widest possible range of relative pressure, while allowing for slow equilibration and other operational problems, particularly at very low pressures. In spite of its artificial nature, the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method is still used for the determination of surface area. In principle, nitrogen isotherms of Types II and IV are amenable to BET analysis provided that pores of molecular dimensions are absent and that the BET plot is obtained over an appropriate range of the isotherm. An empirical method based on the application of standard adsorption data is useful for checking the validity of the BET-area. All the computational procedures for pore size analysis have limitations of one sort or another. The various assumptions include an ideal pore shape, rigidity of the structure and an oversimplified model (capillary condensation or micropore filling). The derived pore widths and pore volumes should be regarded as effective (or apparent) values with respect to the adsorption of nitrogen at 77 K. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Physisorption; Nitrogen adsorption; BET method; Surface area; Pore size analysis 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Area Sample Preparation
    THE IMPORTANCE OF SAMPLE PREPARATION WHEN MEASURING SPECIFIC SURFACE AREA Eric Olson ABSTRACT Specific surface area is a fundamental measurement in the field of fine particle characterization. Specific surface area measurements have numerous pharmaceutical manufacturing and quality applications. Compliance professionals should have a general understanding of the principles, procedures, and instrumentation associated with specific surface area testing, and be vigilant of potential situations that may impact the accuracy of test data. The conditions under which a sample is prepared for a specific surface area measurement can often influence test results. The first step when preparing a sample for specific surface area measurement is to clear the surface of all water and various contaminants. Discussed are the different types of water including surface adsorbed water, porosity and absorbed water, and water of hydration. When preparing a sample for analysis, the primary factor to be controlled is the temperature. The importance of thermal analysis is discussed in regards to specific surface area measurement. During heating, samples may undergo various changes, especially to their surfaces. These changes, including glass transitions, sintering, annealing, melting, and decomposition are discussed. Common materials are divided into groups, and general sample preparation conditions are provided for each group. INTRODUCTION Since the introduction of quality by design and design space in ICH Q8i, it has been apparent that US Food and Drug Administration and the rest of the international regulatory community expect pharmaceutical dosage form developers to establish a thorough, science-based knowledge of its product and processes, and present this knowledge in its application. Where the raw material is a solid, the specific surface area may be important, especially to solubility, dissolution, and bioavailability.
    [Show full text]
  • An Image- and BET-Based Monte-Carlo Approach to Determine Mineral Accessible Surface Areas in Sandstones
    ================================================== This a non-peer reviewed preprint submitted to EarthArXiv: An image- and BET-based Monte-Carlo approach to determine mineral accessible surface areas in sandstones Jin Ma, Geothermal Energy & Geofluids Group, Department of Earth Sciences (D-ERDW), ETH-Z¨urich,CH-8092, Switzerland. email: [email protected] Martin O. Saar, Geothermal Energy & Geofluids Group, Department of Earth Sciences (D-ERDW), ETH-Z¨urich,CH-8092, Switzerland. email: [email protected] Xiang-Zhao Kong, Geothermal Energy & Geofluids Group, Department of Earth Sciences (D-ERDW), ETH-Z¨urich,CH-8092, Switzerland. email: [email protected] ================================================== 1 1 An image- and BET-based Monte-Carlo approach to 2 determine mineral accessible surface areas in sandstones ∗ 3 Jin Ma, Martin O. Saar, Xiang-Zhao Kong 4 Geothermal Energy and Geofluids Group, Department of Earth Sciences, ETH-Z¨urich,CH-8092, 5 Switzerland 6 Abstract 7 Accessible surface areas (ASAs) of individual rock-forming minerals exert a fun- 8 damental control on how minerals react with formation fluids. However, due to 9 lacking adequate quantification methods, determining the ASAs of specific minerals 10 in a multi-mineral rock at the appropriate scale still remains difficult. Whole-rock 11 Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) measurements at atomic scales cannot account for 12 the variability in ASAs of individual minerals, while image-based methods are in- 13 herently limited by the image pixel/voxel resolution. Here, we present a novel joint 14 method that overcomes the aforementioned limitations by appropriately downscal- 15 ing individual image-based ASAs with the support of a Monte-Carlo algorithm and 16 BET measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Adsorption Isotherm A
    Objectives_template Module 5: "Adsoption" Lecture 26: "" The Lecture Contains: BET (Brunauer Emmet Teller) Adsorption Isotherm Assumptions in the BET theory Practically useful form Drawbacks of BET adsorption theory Application in Surface Phenomenon Reference file:///E|/courses/colloid_interface_science/lecture26/26_1.htm[6/16/2012 1:07:58 PM] Objectives_template Module 5: "Adsoption" Lecture 26: "" BET (Brunauer Emmet Teller) Adsorption Isotherm Stephen Brunauer, Paul Emmet and Edward Teller published this theory in 1938. It is a theory for multi-layer physisorption and is of profound significance in the development of this field. Fig. 7.7: Active sites in BET adsorption To derive the BET adsorption isotherm equation let us propose the following: Consider the surface of adsorbent to be made up of sites (in the above figure =20) Let number of sites which have adsorbed 0 molecules be = (in the above figure = 8; viz. site number 1, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 17, 18) Let number of sites which have adsorbed 1 molecule be = (in the above figure = 6; viz. sites number 2, 5, 12, 13, 14, 20 ) Let number of sites which have adsorbed 2 molecules be = (in the above figure = 4; viz. sites number 8, 15, 16, 19 ) …….. …….. (and so on) …….. Let number of sites which have adsorbed molecules be = Therefore, total number of sites has to be In the above example it can be verified that 20 = 8 + 6 + 4 + 1 + 1 ( Also it is easy to note that the total number of molecules adsorbed is given by (7.7) In the above figure N = 0*8 + 1*6 +2*4 + 3*1 + 4*1 = 21 molecules (which can be verified by counting) NOTE: Here, for mathematical completeness and without loss of generality we assume that infinite molecules can be adsorbed on one site though practically it is not possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Brunauer Emmett Teller Isotherm on Research in Science Citation Index Expanded
    Environmental Engineering and Management Journal September 2015, Vol.14, No. 9, 2163-2168 http://omicron.ch.tuiasi.ro/EEMJ/ “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, Romania IMPACT OF BRUNAUER EMMETT TELLER ISOTHERM ON RESEARCH IN SCIENCE CITATION INDEX EXPANDED Moonis Ali Khan1,2, Yuh-Shan Ho3 1Chemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia 2Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Aligarh Muslim University, AMU, Aligarh, India 3Trend Research Centre, Asia University, No. 500, Lioufeng Road, Wufeng, Taichung County 41354, Taiwan Abstract A bibliometric analysis along with a brief historical and modifications overview and scientific applications was carried out to reveal the impact of Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) isotherm on scientific research. The data was based on the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) database of the Thomson Reuters Web of Science. BET isotherm received a total of 10,418 citations from its publication to 2012. Among them, 9,117 (88%) were research articles by 20,108 authors with 95% manuscripts in English. Geographical distribution revealed that North America was the most productive continent, while Africa contributed the least citations. In terms of the institutions and research areas, Spanish National Research Council of Spain and chemistry took the lead. Citations on nanoscience and nanotechnology and environmental science categories increased significantly in the last five years. Journal of Colloids and Interface Science published the most BET isotherm cited articles, while “adsorption”, “surface”, and “properties” were the most frequently used words in title. Key words: adsorption, bibliometric, BET isotherm, physical chemistry Received: June, 2013; Revised final: June, 2014; Accepted: July, 2014 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerogel-Like Materials
    gels Article Influence of Structure-Directing Additives on the Properties of Poly(methylsilsesquioxane) Aerogel-Like Materials Marta Ochoa 1,2, Alyne Lamy-Mendes 1 , Ana Maia 1, António Portugal 1 and Luísa Durães 1,* 1 CIEPQPF, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Coimbra, Pólo II, Rua Sílvio Lima, 3030-790 Coimbra, Portugal; [email protected] (M.O.); [email protected] (A.L.-M.); [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (A.P.) 2 Active Aerogels, Parque Industrial de Taveiro, Lote 8, 3045-508 Coimbra, Portugal * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +351-239-798-737; Fax: +351-239-798-703 Received: 22 December 2018; Accepted: 22 January 2019; Published: 28 January 2019 Abstract: The effect of glycerol (GLY) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) additives on the properties of silica aerogel-like monoliths obtained from methyltrimethoxysilane (MTMS) precursor was assessed. The tested molar ratios of additive/precursor were from 0 to 0.1 and the lowest bulk densities were obtained with a ratio of 0.025. When a washing step was performed in the sample containing the optimum PEG ratio, the bulk density could be reduced even further. The analysis of the material’s microstructure allowed us to conclude that GLY, if added in an optimum amount, originates a narrower pore size distribution with a higher volume of mesopores and specific surface area. The PEG additive played a binder effect, leading to the filling of micropores and the appearance of large pores (macropores), which caused a reduction in the specific surface area. The reduction of the bulk density and the microstructural changes in the aerogels induced by adding a small amount of these additives confirm the possibility of fine control of properties of these lightweight materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Specific Surface Area and Pore-Size Distribution in Clays and Shales Utpalendu Kuila ∗ and Manika Prasad Colorado School of Mines, 1500 Illinois St
    Geophysical Prospecting, 2013, 61 , 341–362 doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.12028 Specific surface area and pore-size distribution in clays and shales Utpalendu Kuila ∗ and Manika Prasad Colorado School of Mines, 1500 Illinois St. Golden, CO 80401 Received February 2012, revision accepted December 2012 ABSTRACT One of the biggest challenges in estimating the elastic, transport and storage properties of shales has been a lack of understanding of their complete pore structure. The shale matrix is predominantly composed of micropores (pores less than 2 nm diameter) and mesopores (pores with 2–50 nm diameter). These small pores in the shale matrix are mainly associated with clay minerals and organic matter and comprehending the controls of these clays and organic matter on the pore-size distribution is critical to understand the shale pore network. Historically, mercury intrusion techniques are used for pore-size analysis of conventional reservoirs. However, for unconventional shale reservoirs, very high pressures ( > 414 MPa (60 000 psi)) would be required for mercury to access the full pore structure, which has potential pitfalls. Current instrumental limitations do not allow reliable measurement of significant portions of the total pore volume in shales. Nitrogen gas-adsorption techniques can be used to characterize materials dominated by micro- and mesopores (2–50 nm). A limitation of this technique is that it fails to measure large pores (diameter >200 nm). We use a nitrogen gas-adsorption technique to study the micro- and mesopores in shales
    [Show full text]
  • Scorption Theories Applied to Wood
    SORPTION THEORIES APPLIED TO WOOD1 W. Simpson Forest Products Technologist Forest Products Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture2 (Received 26 December 1979) ABSTRACT A number of sorption theories are discussed in relation to the wood-water system. The theories are tested in terms of how well they can be made to predict moisture content through curve fitting and how well they can predict heats of adsorption. Theories discussed are the BET (Brunauer, Emmett, Teller). Hailwood and Horrobin, King, and Peirce. Even though the theories can be fitted very closely to experimental sorption data, they do not do well in predicting heat of adsorption. They do, however, all suggest the same general form of adsorption: part of the water is intimately associated with cellulose molecules and part is distinctly less intimately associated. Keywords: sorption, isotherms, moisture content. INTRODUCTION Numerous theories have been derived for sorption of gases on solids, many of which can be applied to the sorption of water vapor by wood. Why has such effort been expended, and what success has been achieved? What can sorption theories tell us, and is what they tell realistic? Can they tell us anything useful about the wood-water system? This paper attempts to answer some of these questions. The paper reviews the nature of sorption and how water is held in wood, sorption isotherms, and thermodynamics of sorption, and how it all relates to sorption theory. A description of some of the theories is presented, and finally some tests of the theories developed. This should lead us to the point where we can answer some questions on the usefulness of sorption theories.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the BET Theory for the Characterization of Meso and Microporous Mofs
    REVIEW BET Theory www.small-methods.com Evaluation of the BET Theory for the Characterization of Meso and Microporous MOFs Filip Ambroz, Thomas J. Macdonald,* Vladimir Martis, and Ivan P. Parkin* together by organic bridging ligands to Surface area determination with the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method form 1D, 2D, or 3D structures as illus- [30] is a widely used characterization technique for metal–organic frameworks trated in Figure 1. Since there are a (MOFs). Since these materials are highly porous, the use of the BET theory variety of different metal ions and organic linkers, essentially an infinite number of can be problematic. Several researchers have evaluated the BET method to possible combinations exist.[31] gain insights into the usefulness of the obtained results and interestingly, Furthermore, since MOFs are also their findings are not always consistent. In this review, the suitability of the relatively simple to prepare, building BET method is discussed for MOFs that have a diverse range of pore widths components can be well designed which can result in the production of targeted below the diameters of N2 or Ar and above 20 Å. In addition, the surface area of products.[33–35] Computational calcula- MOFs that are obtained by implementing different approaches, such as grand tions have proven to be useful in pre- canonical Monte Carlo simulations, calculations from the crystal structures dictions of interactions between guest or based on experimental N2, Ar, or CO2 adsorption isotherms, are compared hosts and the framework leading to pos- and evaluated. Inconsistencies in the state-of-the-art are also noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) Surface Area Analysis Introduction  BET  Gas Adsorption Or Nitrogen Adsorption
    Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area analysis Introduction BET Gas adsorption or Nitrogen adsorption Stephen Brunauer, Paul Hugh Emmett, and Edward Teller Directly measures surface area & pore size distribution BET theory deviates from ideal to actual analysis 2 Basic Principle Ideal PV = nRT Actual No gas molecules Never start from no gas molecules Q Ads P/Po Nitrogen gas molecules Monolayer: Gas molecules clump Q Ads together P/Po Saturated Nitrogen gas molecules Multilayer: Gas molecules clump together Q Ads P/Po Some pores are not filled 3 Basic Principle Cont. BET is an extension of Langmuir model Kinetic behavior of the adsorption process Rate of arrival of adsorption is equal to the rate of desorption Heat of adsorption was taken to be constant and unchanging with the degree of coverage, θ 4 Basic Principle Cont. Assumptions Gas molecules behave ideally Only 1 monolayer forms All sites on the surface are equal No adsorbate-adsorbate interaction Adsorbate molecule is immobile 5 BET Theory Basic Principle Cont. Homogeneous surface No lateral interactions between molecules Uppermost layer is in equilibrium with vapour phase First and Higher layer: Heat adsorption All surface sites have same adsorption energy for adsorbate Adsorption on the adsorbent occurs in infinite layers The theory can be applied to each layer 5 Basic Principle Cont. Pore classification Pore size 5 Basic Principle Cont. Adsorption Mechanism Capillary Monolayer Multilayer condensation 5 Sample preparation Weigh solid sample (200 ≈ 300 mg)
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Water Sorption Isotherm of Summer Onion
    ISSN 0258-7122 Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 40(1): 35-51, March 2015 STUDY ON WATER SORPTION ISOTHERM OF SUMMER ONION MD. MASUD ALAM1 AND MD. NAZRUL ISLAM2 Abstract The water sorption characteristics of dehydrated onion and onion solutes composite by vacuum drying (VD) and air drying (AD) were developed at room temperature using vacuum desiccators containing saturated salt solutions at various relative humidity levels (11-93%). From moisture sorption isotherm data, the monolayer moisture content was estimated by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) and Guggenheim-Anderson-de Boer (GAB) equation using data up to a water activity of 0.52 and 0.93 respectively. Results showed that in case of non treated samples the monolayer moisture content values (Wo) of BET gave slightly higher values than GAB (9.7 vs 8.2) for VD, while GAB gave higher value than BET (11.0 vs 9.8) for AD. It is also seen that the treated and non treated onion slice and onion powder absorbed approximately the same amount of water at water activities below about 0.44 and above 0.44 the treated samples begin to absorb more water than the non treated samples. It was observed that 10-20% added of sugar gave no change in water sorption capacity while the amount of sorbed water increases with increasing amount added salt for mix onion product. Keywords: BET equation, GAB equation, Monolayer moisture content, Water activity Introduction Summer onion (Allium cepa L.) is one of the most important spice crop grown all the year round in Bangladesh. Even any curry cannot be think without onion.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying Surface Morphology of Manufactured Activated Carbon And
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Quantifying surface morphology of manufactured activated carbon and the waste cofee grounds using the Getis‑Ord‑Gi* statistic and Ripley’s K function Sanghoon Lee1, Sukjoon Na2, Olivia G. Rogers3 & Sungmin Youn2* Activated carbon can be manufactured from waste cofee grounds via physical and/or chemical activation processes. However, challenges remain to quantify the diferences in surface morphology between manufactured activated carbon granules and the waste cofee grounds. This paper presents a novel quantitative method to determine the quality of the physical and chemical activation processes performed in the presence of intensity inhomogeneity and identify surface characteristics of manufactured activated carbon granules and the waste cofee grounds. The spatial density was calculated by the Getis‑Ord‑Gi* statistic in scanning electron microscopy images. The spatial characteristics were determined by analyzing Ripley’s K function and complete spatial randomness. Results show that the method introduced in this paper is capable of distinguishing between manufactured activated carbon granules and the waste cofee grounds, in terms of surface morphology. Activated carbon is one of the most widely used absorbents in water and wastewater treatment1. Activated car- bon has been used since ancient Greece to remove contaminants in air and water2. Relatively small amounts of activated carbon can absorb signifcant amounts of contaminants due to its extremely large surface area per unit mass. Te porous structure of activated carbon determines the absorptive capacity 3. Many studies have shown the efectiveness of activated carbon adsorption for a wide range of contaminants. According to the literature, activated carbon can efectively adsorb both organic and inorganic contaminants including biological nutrients, pharmaceuticals, endocrine disruptors, pesticides, dyes, heavy metals, and even persistent organic pollutants like per- and polyfuoroalkyl substances4–11.
    [Show full text]