DOCSLIB.ORG

Siebert Brandford Shank & Co., L.L.C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Siebert Brandford Shank & Co., L.L.C NEW ISSUE — BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Moody’s: “Aa3” S&P: “AA-” Fitch: “AAA” (See “MISCELLANEOUS – Ratings” herein.) In the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Bond Counsel to the District, based upon an analysis of existing laws, regulations, rulings, and court decisions, and assuming, among other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and is exempt from State of California personal income taxes. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Bonds is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal individual or corporate alternative minimum taxes, although Bond Counsel observes that such interest is included in adjusted current earnings when calculating corporate alternative minimum taxable income. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any other tax consequences related to the ownership or disposition of, or the amount, accrual or receipt of interest on, the Bonds. See “TAX MATTERS.” $65,000,000 $155,780,000 OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (County of Alameda, California) (County of Alameda, California) General Obligation Bonds (Election of 2006), 2016 General Obligation Refunding Bonds Series 2016A Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on the inside cover page This cover page is not a summary of this issue; it is only a reference to the information contained in this Official Statement. Investors must read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investment decision. The Oakland Unified School District (the “District”) General Obligation Bonds (Election of 2006), Series 2016A (the “Series 2016A Bonds”) were authorized at an election of the registered voters of the District held on June 6, 2006 (the “2006 Election”) at which the requisite 55% or more of persons voting on the bond measure (“Measure B”) voted to authorize the issuance and sale of $435,000,000 principal amount of general obligation bonds of the District. The Series 2016A Bonds are the sixth and last issuance of general obligation bonds of the District authorized at the 2006 Election. The Series 2016A Bonds are being issued and sold by the District (i) to finance specific construction and modernization projects approved by the voters of the District, and (ii) to pay costs of issuance of the Series 2016A Bonds. The Series 2016A Bonds are being issued pursuant to the laws of the State of California (the “State”), a resolution adopted by the Board of Education of the District on June 22, 2016 (the “Series 2016A District Resolution”), and a paying agent agreement, dated as of August 1, 2016 (the “Series 2016A Paying Agent Agreement”), by and among the District, the County of Alameda (the “County”) and U.S. Bank National Association, as paying agent (the “Paying Agent”). See “THE BONDS” herein. The Oakland Unified School District 2016 General Obligation Refunding Bonds (the “Refunding Bonds” and, together with the Series 2016A Bonds, the “Bonds”) are being issued and sold by the District (i) to refund, on a current basis, all of the District’s outstanding General Obligation Bonds Election of 2006, Series 2006 (the “Series 2006 Bonds”), (ii) to refund, on an advance basis, a portion of the District’s outstanding General Obligation Bonds (Election of 2006, Series 2009A) (the “Series 2009A Bonds” and, together with the Series 2006 Bonds, the “Outstanding Bonds”), and (iii) to pay costs of issuance on the Refunding Bonds. The outstanding Series 2006 Bonds and the outstanding Series 2009A Bonds to be refunded and defeased are collectively referred to herein as the “Refunded Bonds.” The Refunding Bonds are being issued pursuant to State laws, a resolution adopted by the Board of Education of the District on June 22, 2016 (the “Refunding District Resolution”), and a paying agent agreement, dated as of August 1, 2016 (the “Refunding Paying Agent Agreement” and, together with the Series 2016A Paying Agent Agreement, the “Paying Agent Agreements”), by and among the District, the County, and the Paying Agent. See “THE BONDS” herein. The Bonds are payable from ad valorem taxes to be levied within the District pursuant to the State Constitution and other State law. The Board of Supervisors is empowered and is obligated to levy ad valorem taxes upon all property subject to taxation by the District, without limitation as to rate or amount (except as to certain personal property which is taxable at limited rates), for the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds, all as more fully described herein. See “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE BONDS” and “RISK FACTORS” herein. The Bonds will be issued as current interest bonds in denominations of $5,000 principal amount and integral multiples thereof as shown on the inside cover page of this Official Statement. Interest on the Bonds is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing on February 1, 2017. The Bonds will be issued in book-entry form only and will be initially issued and registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC”). DTC will act as securities depository for the Bonds. Individual purchases of the Bonds will be made in book-entry form only. Purchasers will not receive physical delivery of the Bonds purchased by them. Payments of the principal of and interest on the Bonds will be made by U.S. Bank National Association, as paying agent, registrar and transfer agent with respect to the Bonds, to DTC for subsequent disbursement through DTC Participants to the beneficial owners of the Bonds. See “THE BONDS – Payment of Principal and Interest” herein. The Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity as described herein. See “THE BONDS – Redemption” herein. The Bonds will be offered when, as and if issued by the District and received by the Underwriter, subject to the approval of legality by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, San Francisco, California, Bond Counsel to the District. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the District by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, San Francisco, California, as Disclosure Counsel to the District. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Underwriter by Curls Bartling P.C., Oakland, California. KNN Public Finance, LLC, Oakland, California, serves as Municipal Advisor to the District in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. It is anticipated that the Bonds, in book-entry form, will be available for delivery through the facilities of DTC on or about August 17, 2016. Siebert Brandford Shank & Co., L.L.C. Dated: August 4, 2016. MATURITY SCHEDULES $65,000,000 OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (County of Alameda, California) General Obligation Bonds (Election of 2006), Series 2016A Maturity Maturity Date Principal CUSIP† Date Principal CUSIP† (August 1) Amount Interest Rate Yield* (672325) (August 1) Amount Interest Rate Yield* (672325) 2020 $1,940,000 4.00% 0.78% YP6 2029 $2,740,000 5.00% 1.94%‡ YY7 2021 1,980,000 4.00 0.93 YQ4 2030 2,115,000 5.00 2.00‡ YZ4 2022 2,060,000 4.00 1.11 YR2 2031 2,850,000 5.00 2.05‡ ZA8 2023 2,145,000 4.00 1.25 YS0 2032 3,125,000 4.00 2.33‡ ZB6 2024 2,230,000 4.00 1.37 YT8 2033 3,250,000 4.00 2.38‡ ZC4 2025 2,320,000 4.00 1.48 YU5 2034 3,380,000 4.00 2.43‡ ZD2 2026 2,410,000 4.00 1.61 YV3 2035 3,515,000 4.00 2.48‡ ZE0 2027 2,505,000 4.00 1.76‡ YW1 2036 3,655,000 4.00 2.53‡ ZF7 2028 2,610,000 5.00 1.86‡ YX9 $20,170,000 3.00% Term Bond due August 1, 2041; Yield 3.07%*; CUSIP† 672325 ZG5 $155,780,000 OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (County of Alameda, California) 2016 General Obligation Refunding Bonds Maturity Maturity Date Principal Interest CUSIP† Date Principal CUSIP† (August 1) Amount Rate Yield* (672325) (August 1) Amount Interest Rate Yield* (672325) 2017 $1,455,000 2.00% 0.49% ZH3 2025 $14,495,000 5.00% 1.48% ZR1 2018 1,550,000 4.00 0.54 ZJ9 2026 16,060,000 5.00 1.61 ZS9 2019 2,020,000 5.00 0.64 ZK6 2027 17,510,000 5.00 1.76‡ ZT7 2020 6,150,000 5.00 0.78 ZL4 2028 19,055,000 5.00 1.86‡ ZU4 2021 7,105,000 5.00 0.93 ZM2 2029 20,720,000 5.00 1.94‡ ZV2 2022 8,125,000 5.00 1.11 ZN0 2030 10,930,000 5.00 2.00‡ ZW0 2023 9,300,000 5.00 1.25 ZP5 2031 11,570,000 5.00 2.05‡ ZX8 2024 9,735,000 5.00 1.37 ZQ3 * Yields certified by the Underwriter. The District takes no responsibility therefor. † CUSIP® is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association. CUSIP Global Services (CGS) is managed on behalf of the American Bankers Association by S&P Capital IQ. Copyright© 2016 CUSIP Global Services. All rights reserved. CUSIP® data herein is provided by CUSIP Global Services. This data is not intended to create a database and does not serve in any way as a substitute for the CGS database. CUSIP® numbers are provided for convenience of reference only. None of the District, the Underwriter or their agents or counsel assumes responsibility for the accuracy of such numbers. ‡ Priced to par call on August 1, 2026.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download the Transcript
    SCHOOL-2017/11/14 1 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION FALK AUDITORIUM OUTCOMES AND CHALLENGES IN U.S. CITIES WITH PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE Washington, D.C. Tuesday, November 14, 2017 The Policy and Politics of Urban School Choice: JON VALANT, Moderator Fellow, Brown Center on Education The Brookings Institution ROBIN LAKE Director, Center on Reinventing Public Education Implementation of School Choice Reforms: JON VALANT, Moderator Fellow, Brown Center on Education The Brookings Institution MAYA BUGG Chief Executive Officer Tennessee Charter School Center BRYAN MORTON Executive Director Parents for Great Camden Schools ANTWAN WILSON Chancellor D.C. Public Schools * * * * * ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 SCHOOL-2017/11/14 2 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. VALANT: Good morning. Welcome to the Brookings Institution. My name is Jon Valant. I’m a fellow here at Brookings in the Brown Center on Education Policy and we’re very happy to have you all with us for the next 90 minutes. That includes both the folks in the room and also those joining through our webcast. And whether you’re in here or out there, you are welcome to follow along the conversation on Twitter with #SchoolChoice. And then we’ll also post a recording of this session after the session’s over on the Brookings site. The topic of today’s conversation is public school choice in U.S. cities. You could make an argument that no modern education reform, with the possible exception of test-based accountability, has fundamentally shaped what his happening in urban schools to the extent that public school choice programs have.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents President’S Welcome Letter
    Table of Contents President’s Welcome Letter .......................................................................................................... 2 Executive Director’s Welcome Letter ........................................................................................ 3 2015 AASA National Conference on Education Program-at-a-Glance ........................4 2015 Focus Zones .............................................................................................................................6 Knowledge Exchange Theater ..................................................................................................... 8 A–Z Conference Information ......................................................................................................12 AASA Awards ...................................................................................................................................16 Sponsor Award Acknowledgments ....................................................................................... 24 Sponsor Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................25 Pre-Conference Workshops .......................................................................................................26 Thursday Conference Sessions-at-a-Glance ........................................................................28 Thursday Conference Session Details ................................................................................... 30 Friday Conference
    [Show full text]
  • Position Statement of Computer Science Education
    X.C. CONNECTICUT STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Hartford TO: State Board of Education FROM: Dr. Dianna R. Wentzell, Commissioner of Education DATE: November 2, 2016 SUBJECT: Position Statement on Computer Science Education Executive Summary Introduction The State Board of Education’s (SBE) focus on equity, high academic achievement, and college and career readiness and its priorities as described in its five-year plan, Ensuring Equity and Excellence for All Connecticut Students –2016-21, supports a call for action in Computer Science Education as evidenced by: 1. The need to have a clear understanding of the principles and practices of computer science in order to be prepared for careers in the 21st century in a computer-intensive world. 2. A lack of access to computer science courses for under-represented minorities and socio-economically challenged groups, as well as a significant gender gap in students enrolling in advanced computer science courses. 3. Computer science being strongly based upon higher tiers of cognitive taxonomy as it involved design, creativity, problem solving, and analysis of solutions to problems. 4. The call in the Every Student Succeeds Act to provide quality computer science instruction as part of a “well-rounded education.” History/Background Over the past few decades, computers have transformed both the world and the workforce in profound ways. The need for such skills across industries continues to grow rapidly, with 51 percent of all science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) jobs projected to be in a computer science-related field by 2018. In addition, according a 2014 study by Gallup and Google, nine in ten parents want computer science taught at their child’s school.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Education and School Choice Discourse in the Washington Post , 2007-2012
    RACE, PLACE, AND POLICY FORMATION: PUBLIC EDUCATION AND SCHOOL CHOICE DISCOURSE IN THE WASHINGTON POST , 2007-2012 A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Kelly Sloane August 2019 Examining Committee Members: Sanjoy Chakravorty, PhD, Advisory Chair, Geography and Urban Studies Kimberly A. Goyette, PhD, Sociology Rickie Sanders, PhD, Geography and Urban Studies Michelle Byng, PhD, External Member, Sociology ABSTRACT As the first city with a majority African American population and a school system that has long served majority low-income African American children, DC offers a compelling case study about public education and school choice in an increasingly affluent city. Using The Washington Post archive, this dissertation considers how discourse about one of the most vital public goods evolved between 2007 and 2012, a period of rapid economic, political, and social change in the city. DC is a civically engaged and diverse city and, The Washington Post has one of the most diverse newsrooms in the country. Post leadership and most writers and contributors were critical of policy and rulings that might cause greater racial segregation in American public schools. Yet, there was no discourse in this archive to suggest that encouraging greater racial or economic integration would be a successful campaign. Instead, The Post advocated for school reform and choice for the neediest students while seemingly absolving families with means who chose to opt out of the public school system. Failing to interrogate the school choices made by middle-class families represents a silence in the archive and illustrates how silence can be productive because it contributes toward the maintenance of a segregated public school system.
    [Show full text]
  • Council of the Great City Schools2015
    COUNCIL OF THE GREAT CITY SCHOOLS 2015- ANNUAL REPORT 2016 OFFICERS Chair of the Board Richard Carranza, San Francisco Superintendent Chair-Elect Felton Williams, Long Beach School Board Secretary/Treasurer Kaya Henderson, District of Columbia Chancellor Immediate Past Chair Jumoke Hinton Hodge, Oakland School Board MEMBERS Thomas Ahart, Des Moines Superintendent José Banda, Sacramento Superintendent JoAnn Brannon, Nashville School Board Juan Cabrera, El Paso Superintendent Marnell Cooper, Baltimore School Board Paul Cruz, Austin Superintendent Executive Committee 2015-2016 Committee Executive Darienne Driver, Milwaukee Superintendent Doretha Edgecomb, Hillsborough County School Board Lawrence Feldman, Miami-Dade County School Board Eric Gordon, Cleveland CEO Michael Hanson, Fresno Superintendent Barbara Jenkins, Orange County Superintendent Pam Knowles, Portland School Board Michael O’Neill, Boston School Committee Ashley Paz, Fort Worth School Board Paula Wright, Duval County School Board Ex Officio Deborah Shanley, Brooklyn College CUNY Dean Report Prepared by: Tonya Harris, Communications Manager Henry Duvall, Director of Communications Marilyn Gates Davis, Graphic Design Consultant Photography by: Alex Jones, Clarence Tabb Jr. and Ron Thomas Cover Photo: Top Row, left: Students from Portland Public Schools; right: Students from Fresno Unified School District; Bottom row: left, Student from Des Moines Public Schools, right: Students from Long Beach Unified School District Page 1 Photo: Student from Long Beach Unified School District;
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2014 | Volume 14, Issue 3
    NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY MAGAZINE CARE | FALL 14 | VOLUME 14, ISSUE 3 An administrator with a From Crisis to knack for turnarounds College-Ready turns his eye to Oakland. PLUS: ANNUAL REPORT OF GIVING It’s All About Community FROM THE PRESIDENT Dear Alumni and Friends, This fall we began using our emblematic sunfl ower in a new way to celebrate its old favor among all who hold Nebraska Wesleyan University dear. We established the Quarter Century Club and inducted into it the members of the faculty and staff , including emeriti and retirees, who’ve served here for 25 years or more. To our delight, a great many were eligible because our school is so mightily blessed by people who come—sometimes imagining just a brief sojourn—and stay for many decades. The sunfl ower has one of those tiny seeds that amaze us with how impressively they grow under the right conditions. For me and I’m sure many of you, the parable of the mustard seed, told by Jesus in the Gospels, comes to mind when I think of a very small seed. “The Kingdom of Heaven is like a grain of mustard seed … when it is grown it is greater than the herbs and becomes a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in its branches” (Matthew 13: 31-32). A sunfl ower seed may lie dormant in the ground for as long as 25 years, until once warmed by the sun it begins its transformation into a tall and lovely fl ower. At my own alma mater, more than a quarter-century ago a group of alumni created an experience much like the generative power of the smallest seeds, whether in the ancient Middle East or on the modern Great Plains of North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Big-City School Districts Address Post-Election Uncertainty
    SPECIAL EDITION Fall Conference • New Leader in D.C., p.3 ANNIVERSARY • Voters Weigh In, p.4 LEGISLATIVE • Expectations, Speculations, p.10 The Nation’s Voice for Urban Education November/December 2016 Vol. 25, No. 8 www.cgcs.org Big-City School Districts Address Post-Election Uncertainty In one of the most contentious and divi- The majority of students in the Des sive presidential campaigns in U.S. history, Moines school system are students of color, Americans reacted with surprise, fear, anxi- and they represent more than 100 different ety and joy following the Nov. 8 election of nations. More than one out of five students business mogul Donald Trump as the na- are English language learners. tion’s 45th president. “The rhetoric of this past election has While former secretary of state Hill- caused many concerns and divisions among Eric Holder ary Clinton won the popular vote count, them, their friends and their families,” the Trump’s electoral college victory was hard Des Moines school district posted in an Former Attorney to swallow by many Americans. online “For the Record” article. A number of urban public school dis- tricts immediately reached out to their Supporting Students General Addresses staffs, faculties, students and parents to address their emotions and uncertainty of The San Diego Unified School District Urban Educators what might lie ahead with a Trump admin- is planning a countywide rally Dec. 14 to istration. support students and their families who MIAMI--Eric Holder’s worst expe- In a letter addressed “Dear Boston may feel vulnerable following the recent rience as attorney general of the United Public Schools Family,” Superintendent presidential election.
    [Show full text]
  • College Promise in California: Strategies, Challenges, and Successes!
    August 30, 2016 | Oakland, California WiFi Log-in: PSAV_Event_Solutions Venue Information Password: CACollegePromise16 2 Welcome to College Promise in California: Strategies, Challenges, and Successes! We are very pleased that you have chosen to join us today as we work together to improve the success of our students and communities. As you know, College Promise programs are designed to expand access to postsecondary education, foster a college-going culture, increase degree and certificate attainment, and strengthen the local community, socially and economically. These community- and state-based models have grown steadily over the years and the momentum has increased both nationally and in California. Today, we will have the opportunity to learn from and collaborate with college, community, and state partners who are implementing, developing, or considering establishing College Promise programs across the California community colleges. Throughout the day, we will provide opportunities for you to: • Gain an understanding of the local, state, and national College Promise movement; • Learn how to design, implement, and improve program elements such as eligibility criteria, financing, student support services, community partnerships, measurement, and community outreach; and • Connect with and build a community of College Promise colleagues across the state. We hope that participation in this event offers you useful ideas and information for developing and strengthening your College Promise program. We look forward to supporting your efforts and engaging in more cross-state College Promise conven- ings and collaboration in the future. Thank you for joining us. Sincerely, Helen Benjamin, California College Promise Campaign Leadership Team Larry Galizio, Community College League of California Martha Kanter, College Promise Campaign Mary Rauner, REL West at WestEd Erik E.
    [Show full text]
  • Nativism in Immigration: the Racial Politics of Educational Sanctuaries
    NGUYỄN NATIVISM IN IMMIGRATION: THE RACIAL POLITICS OF EDUCATIONAL SANCTUARIES DAVID HÒA KHOA NGUYỄN*1 INTRODUCTION While comprehensive immigration reform—specifically the DREAM Act2—has yet to be passed and implemented, President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) has opened access and opportunities for undocumented students.3 However, the election of President Donald Trump has sparked contentious political, societal, and litigious debates, especially concerning undocumented students and the continuation of the DACA program.4 While © 2019 David Hòa Khoa Nguyễn * Assistant Professor of Urban Educational Leadership & Policy Studies at the Indiana Univer- sity School of Education and Adjunct Professor of Law at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, both on the Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) campus. Dr. Nguyễn thanks Amelia King-Kostelac and Alyse Gray-Parker, both doc- toral students in Educational Leadership & Policy Studies program The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA) for their research assistance on this project. He also thanks Carolyn Schorr, Editor-in-Chief of the Journal, and the staff editors for their editorial assistance. 1 Some of the content for this article is adopted from an earlier article on sanctuary campuses. See David H.K. Nguyễn, #ICEOffOurCampus: The Liability and Responsibility of Colleges and Universities for the Educational Attainment of Dreamers, 5 BELMONT L. REV. 152 (2018). 2 See THE DREAM ACT, DACA, AND OTHER POLICIES DESIGNED TO PROTECT DREAMERS, AM. IMMIGR. COUNCIL (Sept. 2017), https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/de- fault/files/research/the_dream_act_daca_and_other_policies_designed_to_protect_dream- ers.pdf (explaining the purpose and history of the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act, which was introduced in 2001 and has seen numerous iterations since); see also S.
    [Show full text]
  • School Desegregation, Resegregation, and Educational Reform
    HOW BROWN BECAME COLOR BLIND: SCHOOL DESEGREGATION, RESEGREGATION, AND EDUCATIONAL REFORM A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of A S The Requirements for 3 G The Degree aoil- Bh[)C B Master of Arts In Education: Special Interest by Emily Starr Bean San Francisco, California May 2017 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read How Brown Became Color Blind: School Desegregation, Resegregation, and Educational Reform by Emily Starr Bean, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree: Master of Arts in Education: Special Interest at San Francisco State University. David Hemphill, Ed.D Professor of Education HOW BROWN BECAME COLOR BLIND. SCHOOL DESEGREGATION, RESEGREGATION, AND EDUCATIONAL REFORM Emily Starr Bean San Francisco, California 2017 In this study, I review the history of school desegregation, the attempts to integrate schooling, and propose renewed efforts in this direction. I begin with the promises of the Brown v. Board o f Education (1954) ruling and an analysis of evolving contemporary segregation patterns. I then provide an overview of the ways in which the failure of the courts, housing segregation, and community resistance have contributed to the continuation of segregated schooling. I next review the current role of privatization within the education reform movement, focusing on school choice policies, and analyze the ways in which these policies contribute to contemporary issues of segregation. I conclude by providing policy suggestions that could, despite the obstacles that have emerged since Brown, continue to make integrated schools a reality in many communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Happy Thoughts Knowledge Is Bliss at NWU from the President
    NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY MAGAZINE SMILE! | WINTER 12-13 | VOLUME 13, ISSUE 4 HAPPY THOUGhtS Knowledge is bliss at NWU FROM THE PRESIDENT Dear Alumni and Friends, What should I write to you by way of introducing a magazine issue with a lead article about happiness? Here are some verbal morsels on the topic from the famous and notable that I find compelling: “Happiness and moral duty are inseparably connected.” —George Washington “So let all give as their hearts guide them, because God loves a cheerful giver.” —2 Corinthians 9:7 “Since you get more joy out of giving joy to others, you should put a good deal of thought into the happiness that you are able to give.” —Eleanor Roosevelt “To enjoy good health, to bring true happiness to one’s family, to bring peace to all, one must first discipline and control one’s own mind.” —The Buddha “True happiness… is not attained through self-gratification, but through fidelity to a worthy purpose.” —Helen Keller “Only buy something that you’d be perfectly happy to hold if the market shut down for 10 years.” —Warren Buffett Leading Nebraska “Happiness often sneaks in through a door you didn’t know you left open.” —John Barrymore Wesleyan University, Wise thoughts from wise people, they all ring true to me in my role. Lead- there is happiness in ing Nebraska Wesleyan University, there is happiness in the formation of minds and the preparation of lives here; happiness in duty fulfilled; happiness in staying the formation of minds a course of excellence in education pursued for 125 years; happiness in shar- ing stories of campus life and learning; happiness in assessing our challenges and and the preparation addressing them; happiness in learning every day about talents, accomplishments, and courageous efforts; happiness in making the case for independent higher edu- cation as a most worthy purpose; happiness in the giving that keeps NWU strong.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoliberal Crisis-Making and the Reconstruction of Public Education
    Selling School Reform: Neoliberal Crisis-Making and the Reconstruction of Public Education by Nirali Jani A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Daniel Perlstein, Chair Professor Janelle Scott Professor Michael Omi Summer 2017 Abstract Selling School Reform: Neoliberal Crisis-Making and the Reconstruction of Public Education by Nirali Saurabh Jani Doctor of Philosophy in Education University of California, Berkeley Professor Daniel Perlstein, Chair This study asks how neoliberal reform became the hegemonic framework for racial justice and educational equity. Using an interdisciplinary methodology, I examine three reform projects that operate on different terrains – or scales – of ‘governmentality’: that of broad public sense-making, that of district policymaking, and that of individual and community-based subjectivities. The first project (Chapter Two) was a national publicity campaign funded by the Broad and Gates foundations. In this chapter, I use Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to understand how reformers used language to shape public consciousness, pointing to the continuity of an educational “crisis discourse” first manufactured in the Reagan era. Chapter Three examines the state takeover and neoliberal reconstruction of an urban school district. Using the theoretical framework of “disaster capitalism” (Klein, 2007), I trace how the neoliberal reform network penetrated the district, fundamentally reshaping its structures and processes. In the fourth chapter, I use ethnographic methods to study the effects of ‘punitive privatization’ on a school site steeped in historical traditions of anti-racist and anti- capitalist critique.
    [Show full text]