Gender, Nature, and Nurture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gender, Nature, and Nurture Gender, Nature, and Nurture Gender, Nature, and Nurture Richard A.Lippa California State University, Fullerton LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES, PUBLISHERS Mahwah, New Jersey London Senior Editor: Debra Riegert Textbook Marketing Manager: Marisol Kozlovski Editorial Assistant: Jason Planer Cover Design: Kathryn Houghtaling Lacey Textbook Production Manager: Paul Smolenski Full-Service & Composition: Pre-Press Company, Inc. Text and Cover Printer: Hamilton Printing Company This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2008. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to http://www.ebookstore.tandf.co.uk/.” Copyright © 2002 by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by photostat, microfilm, retrieval system, or any other means, without prior written permission of the publisher. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers 10 Industrial Avenue Mahwah, New Jersey 07430 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lippa, Richard A. Gender, nature, and nurture/Richard A.Lippa p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8058-3605-5 (alk. paper) ISBN 0-8058-3606-3 1. Sex differences (Psychology) 2. Gender identity. 3. Nature and nurture. I. Title. BF692.2 .L555 2001 155.3′3–dc21 2001033505 ISBN 1-4106-0279-6 Master e-book ISBN In loving memory of my aunt and uncle, Mitzi and Ed Levy, who lived their lives to the fullest and who faced illness with dignity and courage. Contents Preface xiii CHAPTER 1: WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE ANYWAY? 1 The Study of Sex Differences 4 Combining the Results of Many Studies: Meta-Analysis 9 What Do Meta-Analyses Tell Us About Sex Differences? 11 Are There Sex Differences in Personality? 11 Are There Sex Differences in Risk Taking? 13 Are There Sex Differences in Social Behaviors? 15 Aggression 15 Helping Behavior 15 Conformity and Susceptibility to Persuasion 16 Group Behavior and Leadership 17 Are There Sex Differences in Nonverbal Behavior and Nonverbal 18 Perceptiveness? Are There Sex Differences in Sexuality and Mate Preferences? 20 Are There Sex Differences in Occupational Preferences and Interests? 23 Are There Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities? 23 Are There Sex Differences in Physical Abilities? 24 Beyond Meta-Analyses: Other Possible Sex Differences 25 Sex Differences in Mental and Behavioral Disorders 25 Sex Differences in Emotional Experience 27 vii viii Contents Sex Differences in the Self-Concept 28 Sex Differences in Children’s Friendship Patterns 29 Summary 30 CHAPTER 2: MASCULINITY AND FEMININITY: GENDER 33 WITHIN GENDER The Search Commences: Terman and Miles’s Early Work at Stanford 34 The Analogy Between Masculinity-Femininity and Intelligence 34 The Bipolar Assumption 36 What Is Masculinity-Femininity Related To? 40 Masculinity and Femininity as Separate Dimensions 41 Cracks In Terman and Miles’s Edifice 42 The Rise of Androgyny: Masculine Instrumentality and Feminine 43 Expressiveness Putting Androgyny to the Test 45 Masculinity, Feminity and Psychological Adjustment 48 Whither Androgyny? 49 But Don’t Masculinity and Femininity Make Sense to Most of Us? 51 Components of Masculinity and Femininity 51 Masculinity and Feminity as “Fuzzy Concepts” 52 Deconstructing and Reconstructing Masculinity-Femininity 54 Recapitulatlon 54 Resurrecting Masculinity-Femininity: Gender Diagnosticity 55 What Is GD Related To? 58 Is There a “Deep Structure” to Masculinity-Femininity? 62 Summary 64 CHAPTER 3: THEORIES OF GENDER 65 Levels of Explanation Applied to Gender 65 Contents ix Biological Theories 68 Evolutionary Theory 69 Genetics and Prenatal Hormonal Factors 76 Structural Differences Between Male and Female Nervous Systems 80 From Nature to Nurture 82 Social Learning Theories 83 Cognitive Theories of Gender 84 Kohlberg’s Cognitive-Developmental Theory 85 Gender Schema Theories 86 Social Psychological Theories of Gender 88 Gender Stereotypes 88 Social Role Theory 90 Gender Stereotypes as Self-Fulfilling Prophecies 92 Stereotype Threat 92 Self-Presentation Theory 93 Summary 94 CHAPTER 4: THE CASE FOR NATURE 96 Animal Experiments 96 Humans with Unusual Early Exposure to Sex Hormones 98 CAH Females 98 Androgen-lnsensitive Males 99 Reductase-Deficient Males 100 Effects of Estrogen: DES Children and Turner’s Syndrome Women 101 Females Exposed to DES 101 Turner’s Syndrome 102 x Contents Correlational Studies of Hormones and Behavior in Humans 103 Testosterone and Human Behavior 103 Physical Characteristics Related to Prenatal Testosterone 106 Other Hormones and Gender-Related Behaviors 107 “Natural Experiments” and Sex Reassignment 108 Biology and Human Sex Differences 109 The Case For Biological Influences 111 Physical Aggression 111 Visual-Spatial Ability 113 Sexual Behavior 115 Demonstrating Biological Influences on Individual Differences in 119 Masculinity and Femininity: Behavior Genetic Studies Summary 122 CHAPTER 5: THE CASE FOR NURTURE 123 Learning to “Do Gender” 125 Boys’ and Girls’ Toy Preferences 126 Parental Treatment and the Social Learning of Gender 126 Teacher Influences 130 Peer Influences 132 Learning Gender After Early Childhood 133 Modeling Gender 133 Learning Gender from the Mass Media 135 Self-Socialization of Gender 137 Gender Knowledge 138 Gender Knowledge and Sex-Typed Behavior 139 Social Influences on Gender Knowledge 143 Contents xi Consequences of Gender Stereotypes 144 Enacting Stereotypes 144 Self-Fulfilling Prophecies and Behavioral Confirmation 145 Stereotype Threat: When Negative Stereotypes Undermine 147 Performance Broader Social Factors: Social Roles and Status Differences 148 Coda 151 Summary 151 CHAPTER 6: CROSS-EXAMINATIONS 154 “Nature” and “Nurture” Debate the Evidence Presented in Chapters 154 4 and 5 Summary 184 CHAPTER 7: GENDER, NATURE, AND NURTURE: LOOKING 186 TO THE FUTURE Causal Cascades and Causat Thickets 188 Gender as a Complex Causal Cascade 188 Causal Cascades and the Nature-Nurture Debate 191 Cascades, Fulcrums, and Social Interventions 193 Causal Cascades and the Two Faces of Gender 196 Gender, Nature, and Nurture: Some Real-Life Concerns 199 Rearing Girls and Boys 200 Childhood Gender Segregation: Can It Be Reduced? 202 Gender in the Classroom 203 Solutions for Problems Faced by Girls and Boys in the Classroom 204 The Value of Same-Sex Schooling 205 Sexual Harassment and Assault: Are They Male Problems? 207 Husbands and Wives: The Nature and Nurture of Close Relationships 208 xii Contents Rearing Children 208 Divisions of labor 209 Harmony, Disharmony, and Divorce 210 Child Custody 211 Gender in the Workplace: Parental Leave, Day Care, and “Mommy 212 Tracks” Political Animals: Men and Women Who Govern 215 Women and Men in the Military: The Battles of the Sexes 217 Coda 220 Summary 220 References 221 Author Index 253 Subject Index 263 Preface I don’t know about you, but throughout my life I have been puzzled by the behavior of both men and women. When I go to the gym, I am bemused by men’s animated conversations about football games and cars, and when I go to the local gift shop, I am equally bemused by women who endlessly discuss how “darling” various ceramic figurines are. I don’t think I am alone in finding both men and women somewhat inscrutable, each in their own way. And I’m certainly not alone in pondering the nature and nurture of gender. Most of us try hard to understand what makes individual boys, girls, men, and women “tick,” so most of us constantly grapple with gender, either consciously or unconsciously. We live and work and play with members of both sexes, and inevitably, we love and loathe individual males and females. If nothing else, the topic of gender carries immense egocentric appeal, for we all possess gender, in one form or another. And of course, the topic of gender is intimately tied to other favorite topics—like love, sex, and romance. In a more serious and political vein, our personal views of gender are linked to other important attitudes—about affirmative action, sexual harassment, women in the military, and a host of other topics. For all these reasons, gender is a “hot” topic—in everyday conversations, on talk shows, and in popular books. Gender is also a hot topic among scientists. It has long been the focus of a veritable cottage industry of empirical research in the social and biological sciences. And after decades of concerted effort, scientists now have a lot to say about the causes and consequences of gender. The book you are about to read— Gender, Nature, and Nurture—presents a straightforward and accessible summary of scientific findings on gender. It offers a balanced, fair-minded account of what science currently does and does not know about the behavior of males and females, and it describes the major theories that attempt to explain gender differences, gender similarities, and gender variations. Because Gender, Nature, and Nurture is, on one level, a “primer” of gender research, it is ideally suited for classes on the psychology of women, the psychology of men, sex roles, and gender. It can also serve as a stimulating accompaniment to introductory psychology and critical thinking classes, for it addresses a host of mainstream topics in psychology (personality, social behavior, cognitive abilities, biological psychology, behavioral genetics, evolutionary psychology) from the vantage point of a single unifying theme— gender. Students who read the book will exercise their critical thinking skills as they evaluate competing theories and
Recommended publications
  • Intellectual Precocity: What Have We Learned Since Terman?
    Article Gifted Child Quarterly 0(0) 1–26 Intellectual Precocity: What Have ! 2020 National Association for Gifted Children We Learned Since Terman? Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/0016986220925447 journals.sagepub.com/home/gcq David Lubinski1 and Camilla P. Benbow1 Abstract Over the past 50 years, eight robust generalizations about intellectual precocity have emerged, been empirically docu- mented, and replicated through longitudinal research. Within the top 1% of general and specific abilities (mathematical, spatial, and verbal) over one third of the range of individual differences are to be found, and they are meaningful. These individual differences in ability level and in pattern of specific abilities, which are uncovered by the use of above-level assessments, structure consequential quantitative and qualitative differences in educational, occupational, and creative out- comes. There is no threshold effect for abilities in predicting future accomplishments; and the concept of multipotentiality evaporates when assessments cover the full range of all three primary abilities. Beyond abilities, educational/occupational interests add value in identifying optimal learning environments for precocious youth and, with the addition of conative variables, for modeling subsequent life span development. While overall professional outcomes of exceptionally precocious youth are as exceptional as their abilities, educational interventions of sufficient dosage enhance the probability of them leading exceptionally
    [Show full text]
  • Here Stanley Taught
    NEWS FEATURE How to raise a genius A long-running study of exceptional children reveals what it takes to produce the scientists who will lead the twenty-first century. BY TOM CLYNES 152 | NATURE | VOL 537 | 8 SEPTEMBER 2016 ǟ ƐƎƏƖ !,(++- 4 +(2'#12 (,(3#"Ʀ /13 .$ /1(-%#1 341#ƥ ++ 1(%'32 1#2#15#"ƥ ǟ ƐƎƏƖ !,(++- 4 +(2'#12 (,(3#"Ʀ /13 .$ /1(-%#1 341#ƥ ++ 1(%'32 1#2#15#"ƥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ ɥ FEATURE NEWS n a summer day in 1968, professor Julian Stanley met and academics, our Fortune 500 CEOs and federal judges, senators and a brilliant but bored 12-year-old named Joseph Bates. billionaires,” he says. The Baltimore student was so far ahead of his class- Such results contradict long-established ideas suggesting that expert mates in mathematics that his parents had arranged performance is built mainly through practice — that anyone can get for him to take a computer-science course at Johns to the top with enough focused effort of the right kind. SMPY, by con- Hopkins University, where Stanley taught. Even that trast, suggests that early cognitive ability has more effect on achievement wasn’t enough. Having leapfrogged ahead of the adults in the class, than either deliberate practice or environmental factors such as socio- Othe child kept himself busy by teaching the FORTRAN programming economic status. The research emphasizes the importance of nurturing language to graduate students. precocious children, at a time when the prevailing focus in the United Unsure of what to do with Bates, his computer instructor introduced States and other countries is on improving the performance of strug- him to Stanley, a researcher well known for his work in psycho metrics gling students (see ‘Nurturing a talented child’).
    [Show full text]
  • Camilla Persson Benbow
    CAMILLA PERSSON BENBOW March 2019 Patricia and Rodes Hart Dean of Education and Human Development Peabody College MSC 329, Peabody Station Office: (615) 322-8407 Vanderbilt University Fax: (615) 322-8501 Nashville, TN 37203 [email protected] Educational Background BA (1977-Psychology), MA (1978-Psychology), MS (1980-Education), and EdD (1981-Gifted), Johns Hopkins University Dissertation Development of Mathematical Talent Academic Background Dean, Peabody College of Education and Human Development, 7/98-present Professor, Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, 7/98-present Interim Dean, College of Education, Iowa State University, 7/96-6/98 Chair, Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, 7/92-6/98 Distinguished Professor, Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, 7/95-6/98 Professor, Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, 8/90-6/95 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, 7/85-8/90 Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology (part-time), Johns Hopkins University, 7/83-4/86 Associate Research Scientist, Department of Psychology, Johns Hopkins University, 5/81-4/86 Administrative Positions (Not Listed Above) Director, Iowa Talent Search Program, Iowa State University, 8/89-6/98 Director, Office of Precollegiate Programs for Talented and Gifted, Iowa State University, 9/87-6/98 Director, CY-TAG (Challenges for Youth - Talented and Gifted), Iowa State University, 9/86-6/98 Co-Director, Iowa Governor's Institute for the Gifted and Talented, Iowa State University, 10/89-91 Co-Director, Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY), 7/91-present Director, Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY), Iowa State University, 5/86-6/91 Co-Director of Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY), Johns Hopkins University, 7/85-4/86 Associate Director, Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY), Johns Hopkins University, 5/81- 7/85 Assistant Director, Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth, Johns Hopkins University, 6/79-6/81 Benbow 2 Books Benbow, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Critical Thinking Through the Arts
    Developing Critical Thinking Through The Arts DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING THROUGH THE ARTS by MARK L. EUTSLER A thesis for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION at NEWBURGH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY Newburgh, IN USA Submitted to Newburgh Theological Seminary Faculty for Approval 10 October 2017 (33,210) i Developing Critical Thinking Through The Arts Declaration Concerning Thesis Presented for the Degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION I, Mark L. Eutsler, of 215 N. Main St., P.O. Box 61, Linden, IN USA Solemnly and sincerely declare, in relation to the Ph.D. thesis entitled: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING THROUGH THE ARTS (a) That work was done by me, personally (b) The material has not previously been accepted for any other degree or diploma Signature:__________________________________________ Date:_10 October 2017 2013 Copyright © 2017 Mark L. Eutsler ii Developing Critical Thinking Through The Arts ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It’s a great privilege to have conducted this research and prepare this dissertation involving a triune of topics—God, the arts, and critical thinking. Knowing that we are created in God’s image and, as followers of Jesus, have the mind of Christ and are part of the priesthood of all believers, it is excited to tout the benefits of honing critical thinking. Linking critical thinking with the arts broaches a unique relationship, symbiotic in essence. When one considers to what degrees the arts drive critical thinking and vice versus one is instantly transported to a realm where the interrelatedness of all genres and subject areas come forth in intradisciplinary, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary ways. Thanks to those mentors in my life (known and unknown—in the spirit realm—to me) who have helped me achieve a way of thinking that has caused me to explore Developing Critical Thinking Through The Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise David Lubinski and Camilla Persson Benbow
    PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Special Section: Doing Psychological Science Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise David Lubinski and Camilla Persson Benbow Vanderbilt University ABSTRACT—This review provides an account of the Study (e.g., administration, law, medicine, and the social sci- of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) after 35 ences). By their mid-30s, the men and women appeared to years of longitudinal research. Findings from recent be happy with their life choices and viewed themselves as 20-year follow-ups from three cohorts, plus 5- or 10-year equally successful (and objective measures support these findings from all five SMPY cohorts (totaling more than subjective impressions). Given the ever-increasing im- 5,000 participants), are presented. SMPY has devoted portance of quantitative and scientific reasoning skills in particular attention to uncovering personal antecedents modern cultures, when mathematically gifted individuals necessary for the development of exceptional math-science choose to pursue careers outside engineering and the careers and to developing educational interventions to physical sciences, it should be seen as a contribution to facilitate learning among intellectually precocious youth. society, not a loss of talent. Along with mathematical gifts, high levels of spatial ability, investigative interests, and theoretical values form a par- Society is becoming more knowledge based, technological, and ticularly promising aptitude complex indicative of poten- tial for developing scientific expertise and of sustained international (Friedman, 2005); the physical and social systems commitment to scientific pursuits. Special educational within which people operate are increasingly complex and dy- opportunities, however, can markedly enhance the devel- namic, and economies are built upon ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise David Lubinski and Camilla Persson Benbow
    PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Special Section: Doing Psychological Science Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise David Lubinski and Camilla Persson Benbow Vanderbilt University ABSTRACT—This review provides an account of the Study (e.g., administration, law, medicine, and the social sci- of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) after 35 ences). By their mid-30s, the men and women appeared to years of longitudinal research. Findings from recent be happy with their life choices and viewed themselves as 20-year follow-ups from three cohorts, plus 5- or 10-year equally successful (and objective measures support these findings from all five SMPY cohorts (totaling more than subjective impressions). Given the ever-increasing im- 5,000 participants), are presented. SMPY has devoted portance of quantitative and scientific reasoning skills in particular attention to uncovering personal antecedents modern cultures, when mathematically gifted individuals necessary for the development of exceptional math-science choose to pursue careers outside engineering and the careers and to developing educational interventions to physical sciences, it should be seen as a contribution to facilitate learning among intellectually precocious youth. society, not a loss of talent. Along with mathematical gifts, high levels of spatial ability, investigative interests, and theoretical values form a par- ticularly promising aptitude complex indicative of poten- Society is becoming more knowledge based, technological, and tial for developing scientific expertise and of sustained international (Friedman, 2005); the physical and social systems commitment to scientific pursuits. Special educational within which people operate are increasingly complex and dy- opportunities, however, can markedly enhance the devel- namic, and economies are built upon ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Raise a Genius: Lessons from a 45-Year Study of Super-Smart Children
    1 ﻋ ر ﺑ ﻲ How to raise a genius: lessons from a 45-year study of super-smart children A long-running investigation of exceptional children reveals what it takes to produce the scientists who will lead the twenty-first century. • Tom Clynes 07 September 2016 NATURE, 537 Issue 7619 On a summer day in 1968, professor Julian Stanley met a brilliant but bored 12-year-old named Joseph Bates. The Baltimore student was so far ahead of his classmates in mathematics that his parents had arranged for him to take a computer-science course at Johns Hopkins University, where Stanley taught. Even that wasn't enough. Having leapfrogged ahead of the adults in the class, the child kept himself busy by teaching the FORTRAN programming language to graduate students. Unsure of what to do with Bates, his computer instructor introduced him to Stanley, a researcher well known for his work in psychometrics — the study of cognitive performance. To discover more about the young prodigy's talent, Stanley gave Bates a battery of tests that included the SAT college-admissions exam, normally taken by university-bound 16- to 18-year-olds in the United States. Early child development: Body of knowledge Bates's score was well above the threshold for admission to Johns Hopkins, and prompted Stanley to search for a local high school that would let the child take advanced mathematics and science classes. When that plan failed, Stanley convinced a dean at Johns Hopkins to let Bates, then 13, enrol as an undergraduate. Stanley would affectionately refer to Bates as “student zero” of his Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY), which would transform how gifted children are identified and supported by the US education system.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing E V I S N E H E R P M
    NoN-Profit U.S. PoStage PAID NaShville tN Permit No. 293 Office of the Dean Vanderbilt University, Peabody College Peabody #620 230 Appleton Place Nashville, Tennessee 37203-5721 Behavior Programs c o Developing mprehensive f A ll 2009 Contents Are you seeing “green shoots”? 2 Peabody Columns > Peabody College Ranked No. 1 in Nation At Vanderbilt’s Peabody College, as with other institutions, we see them all the time. > New Pre-Doctoral Fellows Program to Assist With Shifting Job Market Paradoxically, they seem to be most visible in the fall. > Peabody Hosts National Conference on Teacher Retirement Benefit Systems > Peabody Research Institute to Conduct First Assessment of Tennessee's We see them, for example, in the nine new faculty members who have joined our Pre-K Program Dean’s ranks, including two new endowed chair holders. This year’s hires underline existing > Peabody Welcomes New Faculty for 2009–2010 strengths in such areas as educational neuroscience, math and science education, > Peabody Receives Funding for Two New International Programs From Message and visual impairments. U.S. State Department > Vanderbilt Serving as Research Partner to New Tennessee Education Initiative Students are perennial green shoots. This year we have welcomed a bumper crop of > Notes and Honors new master’s students along with another class of truly outstanding doctoral students. Peabody’s population of graduate and professional students is at a modern high. 6 Findings > Cognitive Behavioral Program May Help Teens At Risk for Depression Our garden of research initiatives is also looking strong. Having weathered a great > Early Assessment of NYC's School-Wide Performance Bonus Program Released deal of climate change at the federal level, we were pleased to learn that external > Down Syndrome and Ethnicity funding for research in fiscal 2009 was six percent higher than the prior year.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Issues in Science/Math Education (GISME): Over 700 Annotated References & 1000 URL’S – Part 1: All References in Alphabetical Order * † § 
    Gender Issues in Science/Math Education (GISME): Over 700 Annotated References & 1000 URL’s – Part 1: All References in Alphabetical Order * † § Richard R. Hake, Physics Department (Emeritus), Indiana University, 24245 Hatteras Street, Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Jeffry V. Mallow, Physics Department (Emeritus), Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60626 Abstract This 12.8 MB compilation of over 700 annotated references and 1000 hot-linked URL’s provides a window into the vast literature on Gender Issues in Science/Math Education (GISME). The present listing is an update, expansion, and generalization of the earlier 0.23 MB Gender Issues in Physics/Science Education (GIPSE) by Mallow & Hake (2002). Included in references on general gender issues in science and math, are sub-topics that include: (a) Affirmative Action; (b) Constructivism: Educational and Social; (c) Drivers of Education Reform and Gender Equity: Economic Competitiveness and Preservation of Life on Planet Earth; (d) Education and the Brain; (e) Gender & Spatial Visualization; (f) Harvard President Summers’ Speculation on Innate Gender Differences in Science and Math Ability; (g) Hollywood Actress Danica McKellar’s book Math Doesn’t Suck; (h) Interactive Engagement; (i) International Comparisons; (j) Introductory Physics Curriculum S (for Synthesis); (k) Is There a Female Science? – Pro & Con; (l) Schools Shortchange Girls (or is it Boys)?; (m) Sex Differences in Mathematical Ability: Fact or Artifact?; (n) Status of Women Faculty at MIT. In this Part 1 (8.2 MB), all references are in listed in alphabetical order on pages 3-178. In Part 2 (4.6 MB) references related to sub-topics “a” through “n” are listed in subject order as indicated above.
    [Show full text]
  • Benbow and Lubinski
    PSSXXX10.1177/0956797612457784Kell et al.Who Rises to the Top? 457784research-article2013 Research Article Psychological Science 24(5) 648 –659 Who Rises to the Top? Early Indicators © The Author(s) 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0956797612457784 pss.sagepub.com Harrison J. Kell, David Lubinski, and Camilla P. Benbow Vanderbilt University Abstract Youth identified before age 13 (N = 320) as having profound mathematical or verbal reasoning abilities (top 1 in 10,000) were tracked for nearly three decades. Their awards and creative accomplishments by age 38, in combination with specific details about their occupational responsibilities, illuminate the magnitude of their contribution and professional stature. Many have been entrusted with obligations and resources for making critical decisions about individual and organizational well-being. Their leadership positions in business, health care, law, the professoriate, and STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) suggest that many are outstanding creators of modern culture, constituting a precious human-capital resource. Identifying truly profound human potential, and forecasting differential development within such populations, requires assessing multiple cognitive abilities and using atypical measurement procedures. This study illustrates how ultimate criteria may be aggregated and longitudinally sequenced to validate such measures. Keywords cognitive abilities, creativity, human capital, intelligence, profoundly gifted, STEM
    [Show full text]
  • A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back America’S Brightest Students
    DeceivedA Nation How Schools Hold Back : A NationAmerica’s Brightest Students V O L U M E I The Templeton National Report on Acceleration DeceivedA Nation : How Schools Hold Back America’s Brightest Students V O L U M E I Nicholas Colangelo Susan G. Assouline Miraca U. M. Gross The Templeton National Report on Acceleration Endorsed by the National Association for Gifted Children © 2004 The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development Designed by Benson and Hepker Design, Iowa City, Iowa Cover art by Joan Benson Published at The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa October 2004 The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development College of Education The University of Iowa 600 Blank Honors Center Iowa City, Iowa 52242-0454 800.336.6463 http://www.education.uiowa.edu/belinblank Gifted Education Research, Resource and Information Centre (GERRIC) The University of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2052 http://gerric.arts.unsw.edu.au/ http://nationdeceived.org A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back America’s Brightest Students Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... vii Guest Foreword.............................................................................................................................. ix Message to Schools........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Talent Search Book Chapter
    Talent Search Paula Olszewski-Kubilius and Dana Thomson Abstract This chapter discuss the practices of, research in, and important issues regarding talent search, a well-established and researched model of identification and programming for gifted learners. This chapter consists of five main sections. First, it describes three defining features of the the talent search model, which includes (a) an emphasis of domain-specific assessments over general cognitive ability testing (e.g., IQ testing) and highlight above-grade level or off-level assessments (e.g., tests designed for older students) over grade-level tests; (b) providing a variety of outside-of-school programming matched to students’ domain and level of talent as shown in the above-grade level tests; and (c) offering parents many academic advising and counseling resources, such as future course taking and education programs for their children, parenting, and academic and career planning. Second, this chapter briefly discusses the prevalence of talent search practices in the United States. Third, It presents some existing data concerning the performance of talent search students on above-grade level tests compared with the performance of average older students on grade-level tests. Fourth, it summarizes some empirical research that investigated whether talent search scores predict long-term outcomes such as achievement in higher education or early career success. In particular, it elaborates on some existing research on the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY), a talent search program that has been extensively study. Lastly, this chapter discusses the implications of talent search programs and research as well as the limitations of talent search models.
    [Show full text]