DOCSLIB.ORG

The English Eye the French in North America

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE ENGLISH EYE THE FRENCH IN NORTH AMERICA By Lois MULKEARN* T HE French-English dispute which culminated in the French and Indian Wars was as old as the English colonization of North America, and it increased in intensity in direct proportion to the western expansion of those colonies. As early as 1613 the Lord Ambassador of France complained to the English Privy Council "touchinge spoyles and other violences supposed to be committed by His Mates subjects of Great Brittaine upon the subjects of France on the coast of Greenland and Can- nada."1 Captain John Smith in his description of New England written after the voyage of 1614 remarked of the peltry trade: "of Beuers, Otters and Martins, blacke Foxes, and Furres of price, may yeerely be had six or seuen thousand-, and if the trade of the French were preuented, many more: 25,000. this yeere were brought from those northerne parts into France, of which trade we may haue as good part as the French if we take good courses. 2 In 1631 France challenged English right to Virginia by a recapit- ulation of the records of the discoveries of Ribaut and Laudon- niere in Carolina in 1564-66. The English right to Newfoundland they invalidated by citing the discovery of Verazzano in 1523 and Jacques Cartier's voyage up the St. Lawrence River as far as the "Great Sault Saint Louis" in 1535. The French had taken possession of the region around the Great Lakes and the Mississippi and Ohio River valleys. Ac- cording to custom, priests and explorers had erected crosses, at- taching to them the king's coat of arms and a statement of posses- *Mrs. Mulkearn, Librarian of the Darlington Memorial Library, University of Pittsburgh, is editor of the George Mercer Papers and co-author of A Traveler's Guide to Historic Western Pennsylvania, both published by the University of Pittsburgh Press, 1954. 1 Documents Relative to the Colonial History of the State of New Yorl (Albany, 1853-87), III, 2. Hereafter cited N.Y.C.D. 2John Smith, The Generall Historic of Virginia, New-England, and the Summer Isles (London, 1626), p. 213. 316 ENGLISH EYE THE FRENCH IN NORTH AMERICA 317 sion; also, they had built forts and established missions. Although the King of France was pleased with the acquisition of more and more land in the New World, in 1666 he warned Talon not "to embrace too vast a quantity, a portion of which we may perhaps be obliged one day to abandon, to the decrease of his Majesty's reputation and that of his crown." This admonition may have been well founded, for only four years later Talon in a proposal to recover the beaver trade from the west, at the time diverted by the Five Nations to the English and Dutch, remarked that such a check on those Indians "would make the first openings toward Florida across the interior."' With the first acquisition of New York from the Dutch in 1664 the English envisioned an English North America. On July 6, 1666, Governor Nicolls of New York wrote to the Council of Massachusetts. Since he had heard that "His Matie hath author- ized and required yow to reduce Canada to His Maties obedience," Colonel Nicolls wished to inform the Massachusetts governor of the opportune time for "the reduction." The governor had been informed that according to Indian computation 700 Frenchmen were marching on Albany. He remarked that he could not "imagine any reason to the contrary why so faire an advantage against the French, should be let slip, since His Maties directions therein are so positive." By 1673 the English had gained control over all the Dutch possessions which included the Five Nations or Iroquois lands; later the Iroquois reaffirmed this English possession by the Dongan Treaty. The next year the governor "put the Arms of the Duke, now his Maty upon all the Indian Castles near ye Great Lake, and that by their own consent who have submitted to this Government." 4 Always, there were charges and counter- charges by the French and English of infringement upon the rights of the other country. In the beginning the fur trade was of pri- mary interest. Actual possession, of the Ohio Valley by right of settlement came in the eighteenth century. The equilibrium between the two contending powers in North America which should have been established by the Treaty of Neutrality, concluded in November, 1686, did not materialize. By that treaty, France and England were bound to keep peace be- 3N.Y.C.D., IV, 41, 65. 'lbid., III, 120, 363. 318 PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY tween their subjects and "not interfere with the other in his war upon 'wild Indians.' " Since no mention was made of the status of the Five Nations-that they were under British control- France was given a free hand to pursue her war against them and the English were prohibited from interfering in the affair. How- ever, in the conflict the English supplied the Indians with arms and ammunition. Governor Dongan of New York wrote of the affair to the governor in Canada: "Sir, I hope you have a better opinion of me than to think I cannot see as farr as another man, and let me tell Monsr Denonville [the governor] I know what he aims at as well as he does himself and do assure him he shall not obtaine his ends for I will stand by those Indians who have sub- mitted themselves their lands and conquests under the obedience of the King of England to the last . 'tis a very hard thing that all the Countryes a Frenchman walks over in America must belong to Canada." By a warrant issued November 10, 1867, the king vested Governor Dongan with authority to demand of the gover- nor of Canada the release of all Iroquois prisoners. He also in- formed him those tribes were under English jurisdiction and any act of hostility against them was an act of hostility against the English. If the French persisted in "annoying those Indians" the governor was ordered to protect them, even to the extent of levy- ing, arming, and employing all persons residing within New York to resist and withstand the invasion or attempts of the French. The governor was also authorized to erect "Forts, Castles and Platforms" where he needed them.5 With the turn of the century came new English activities. The Earl of Bellomont, royal governor of New York, expressed his views on French expansion. He reported to the English Lords of Trade that the measures recently taken by the king of France would "quickly extend his dominions in this part of the world, further than is consistent with the interest of England." To off- set this expansion the governor suggested that 1,000 regular troops sent to New York and two men-of-war, one each at Boston and New York, would be sufficient help from the mother country. With this assistance Bellomont believed that if another war oc- curred the French could be driven out of Canada. In the same report he suggested that New York should be looked upon as the 'Ibid., 503-504, 513-515. ENGLISH EYE THE FRENCH IN NORTH AMERICA 319 capital province or the "Cittadel" of all the colonies. Although New York did not gain that distinction, it did become foremost in relations between the Indians and the Crown. As late as 1752 the governor of New York complained to Governor Dinwiddie of Virginia that Virginia should not treat with the Six Nations without receiving his permission.' New York, however, was not concerned with the drang nach westen to the upper Ohio Valley so far as settlements were concerned; her interest was the fur trade siphoned from the West through the Six Nations Indians who claimed the region. After almost one hundred years Virginians who had been con- tent in the tidewater region began to move westward. Virginia's first legislative recognition of the region beyond the Blue Ridge was in 1705, when the Assembly passed an act permitting free and open trade with the Indians; also, it provided that, should any- one discover a town or nation of Indians westward of or between the Appalachian Mountains, they would have the sole right to trade with them for fourteen years. Another act of 1705 per- mitted naturalization of aliens and foreigners who had already settled, or would settle, in the colony.7 Governor Alexander Spotswood was responsible for the first organized effort to extend the frontier beyond the Blue Ridge. In 1716 he and other Virginia gentlemen made an Elizabethan Progress over the mountains into the Shenandoah Valley to dis- cover the source of the rivers and to establish favorable trade relations with the Indians, thus checking the rising power of the French. The governor was so pleased with the adventure that he organized the party into a fraternity, the "Knights of the Golden Horse Shoe." Its insignia worn on the breast of the adventurers bore the inscription, Sic juvat transcendere montes (Thus it is a pleasure to cross the mountains).8 The erection of Spotsylvania and Brunswick counties was the outgrowth of Spotswood's exploration. The preamble for the act 'Ibid., IV, 505; New York. Secretary of State, Calendar of Historical Manuscripts, in the Office of the Secretary of State, Albany, N. Y. (Albany, 1866), IT, 602. Virginia. Laws Statutes, etc., The Statutes at Large . of Virginia. edited by W. W. Hening (Richmond, 1809-23), 111, 434, 468-469. 8 Virginia Magazine of History and Biography (Richmond, 1893-date).
Recommended publications
  • Western Pennsylvania Historical Magazine

    Western Pennsylvania Historical Magazine

    Early Development of Transportation 115 EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ON THE MONONGAHELA RIVER By W. Espy Albig* Although the traffic on the Monongahela River from Brownsville to the Ohio had advanced from the canoe of the Indian and the Kentucky boat of the emigrant of Revolu- tionary times, to a water borne traffic of no mean size in passengers and miscellaneous freight, and to more than a million bushels of coal annually before the Monongahela waterway was improved by the installation of locks and dams late in 1841, yet no records remain of the constantly increasing stream of commerce passing over this route be- tween the east and the west. Here and there remains a fragment from a traveller, a ship builder or a merchant giv- ing a glimpse of the river activity of the later years of the 18th century and the early ones of the 19th century. The Ohio Company early recognized the importance of this waterway, and in 1754 Captain Trent on his way to the forks of the Ohio by Nemacolin's and the Redstone trails, built "The Hangard" at the mouth of Redstone Creek. From April 17th, when he surrendered his works to the French and retreated in canoes up the Monongahela, this avenue became more and more important until the steam railways supplanted the slower traffic by water. The easy navigation of this stream led that man of keen insight, George Washington, into error, when, under date of May 27, 1754, he writes: "This morning Mr. Gist ar- rived from his place, where a detachment of fifty men (French) was seen yesterday.
  • The Principal Indian Towns of Western Pennsylvania C

    The Principal Indian Towns of Western Pennsylvania C

    The Principal Indian Towns of Western Pennsylvania C. Hale Sipe One cannot travel far in Western Pennsylvania with- out passing the sites of Indian towns, Delaware, Shawnee and Seneca mostly, or being reminded of the Pennsylvania Indians by the beautiful names they gave to the mountains, streams and valleys where they roamed. In a future paper the writer will set forth the meaning of the names which the Indians gave to the mountains, valleys and streams of Western Pennsylvania; but the present paper is con- fined to a brief description of the principal Indian towns in the western part of the state. The writer has arranged these Indian towns in alphabetical order, as follows: Allaquippa's Town* This town, named for the Seneca, Queen Allaquippa, stood at the mouth of Chartier's Creek, where McKees Rocks now stands. In the Pennsylvania, Colonial Records, this stream is sometimes called "Allaquippa's River". The name "Allaquippa" means, as nearly as can be determined, "a hat", being likely a corruption of "alloquepi". This In- dian "Queen", who was visited by such noted characters as Conrad Weiser, Celoron and George Washington, had var- ious residences in the vicinity of the "Forks of the Ohio". In fact, there is good reason for thinking that at one time she lived right at the "Forks". When Washington met her while returning from his mission to the French, she was living where McKeesport now stands, having moved up from the Ohio to get farther away from the French. After Washington's surrender at Fort Necessity, July 4th, 1754, she and the other Indian inhabitants of the Ohio Val- ley friendly to the English, were taken to Aughwick, now Shirleysburg, where they were fed by the Colonial Author- ities of Pennsylvania.
  • Now Have Taken up the Hatchet Against Them”: Braddock’S Defeat and the Martial Liberation of the Western Delawares

    Now Have Taken up the Hatchet Against Them”: Braddock’S Defeat and the Martial Liberation of the Western Delawares

    We “Now Have Taken up the Hatchet against Them”: Braddock’s Defeat and the Martial Liberation of the Western Delawares N 1755 WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA became the setting for a series of transforming events that resonated throughout the colonial world of INorth America. On July 9, on the banks of the Monongahela River— seven miles from the French stronghold of Fort Duquesne—two regi- ments of the British army, together with over five companies of colonial militia, suffered a historic mauling at the hands of a smaller force of French marines, Canadian militia, and Great Lakes Indians. With nearly one thousand casualties, the defeat of General Edward Braddock’s com- mand signified the breakdown of British presence on the northern Appalachian frontier. This rout of British-American forces also had an immense effect on the future of Indians in the Ohio Country, particularly the peoples of western Pennsylvania referred to as the Delawares. I would like to thank the anonymous readers and my teachers and trusted colleagues, Dr. Holly Mayer of Duquesne University and Dr. Mary Lou Lustig, emeritus West Virginia University, for their constructive criticisms and helpful suggestions as I worked through the revision process for this article. THE PENNSYLVANIA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY Vol. CXXXVII, No. 3 ( July 2013) 228 RICHARD S. GRIMES July From late October 1755 through the spring of 1756, Delaware war parties departing from their principal western Pennsylvania town of Kittanning and from the east in the Susquehanna region converged on the American backcountry. There they inflicted tremendous loss of life and cataclysmic destruction of property on the settlements of Pennsylvania and Virginia.
  • POINT PLEASANT 1774 Prelude to the American Revolution

    POINT PLEASANT 1774 Prelude to the American Revolution

    POINT PLEASANT 1774 Prelude to the American Revolution JOHN F WINKLER ILLUSTRATED BY PETER DENNIS © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CAMPAIGN 273 POINT PLEASANT 1774 Prelude to the American Revolution JOHN F WINKLER ILLUSTRATED BY PETER DENNIS Series editor Marcus Cowper © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 The strategic situation The Appalachian frontier The Ohio Indians Lord Dunmore’s Virginia CHRONOLOGY 17 OPPOSING COMMANDERS 20 Virginia commanders Indian commanders OPPOSING ARMIES 25 Virginian forces Indian forces Orders of battle OPPOSING PLANS 34 Virginian plans Indian plans THE CAMPAIGN AND BATTLE 38 From Baker’s trading post to Wakatomica From Wakatomica to Point Pleasant The battle of Point Pleasant From Point Pleasant to Fort Gower THE AFTERMATH 89 THE BATTLEFIELD TODAY 93 FURTHER READING 94 INDEX 95 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com 4 British North America in1774 British North NEWFOUNDLAND Lake Superior Quebec QUEBEC ISLAND OF NOVA ST JOHN SCOTIA Montreal Fort Michilimackinac Lake St Lawrence River MASSACHUSETTS Huron Lake Lake Ontario NEW Michigan Fort Niagara HAMPSHIRE Fort Detroit Lake Erie NEW YORK Boston MASSACHUSETTS RHODE ISLAND PENNSYLVANIA New York CONNECTICUT Philadelphia Pittsburgh NEW JERSEY MARYLAND Point Pleasant DELAWARE N St Louis Ohio River VANDALIA KENTUCKY Williamsburg LOUISIANA VIRGINIA ATLANTIC OCEAN NORTH CAROLINA Forts Cities and towns SOUTH Mississippi River CAROLINA Battlefields GEORGIA Political boundary Proposed or disputed area boundary
  • Ohio Is Unique Visual Depiction of the Complex and Varied Land Survey Systems in Ohio Attachments

    Ohio Is Unique Visual Depiction of the Complex and Varied Land Survey Systems in Ohio Attachments

    Ohio Is Unique Visual Depiction of the complex and varied Land Survey Systems in Ohio Attachments: Bureau of Land Management Prime Meridian Map Illustrates the original land subdivision systems in the contiguous US, designated by the locations of Prime Meridians. Note Ohio detail. Ohio Original Land Subdivision Map and Key Visually exemplifies the complexity of Ohio’s original land subdivision systems in comparison with other states. Key demonstrates the differences in basic measurement systems of the various regions within Ohio. Provided by the Professional Land Surveyors of Ohio, Inc. 150 E. Wilson Bridge Rd., Suite 300; Worthington, OH 43085 Contact: Melinda Gilpin, Executive Director 614-761-2313 or [email protected] “Ohio is unique among the states of the Union in its variety of its land subdivisions. No other state has so many kinds of original surveys.” C.E. Sherman, Original Ohio Land Subdivisions, Volume III, Final Report, Ohio Cooperative Survey Example of a Metes and Bounds Survey Metes and Bounds Public Land Survey System (PLSS) States Principle Meridians and Baselines Map Bureau of Land Management A Very Brief Summary of Ohio Land Survey Subdivisions Virginia Military District • Only metes and bounds subdivision • Military bounty lands for Virginia soldiers Old Seven Ranges • 6-mi. sq. townships, 1785 section numbering • Surrounds Kimberly Grant Symmes Purchase • 6-mi. sq. townships, 1785 section numbering • Townships/ranges reversed Between the Miamis • Continues Symmes “system” Connecticut Western Reserve • 5-mi. sq. townships, privately subdivided • Includes Firelands, land to compensate residents of several Conn. towns burned during Revolution Ohio Company Purchase • 6-mi. sq. townships, 1785 section numbering • 1st large land purchase from federal government • Site of Marietta, 1st permanent settlement in NW Terr.
  • The Protocols of Indian Treaties As Developed by Benjamin Franklin and Other Members of the American Philosophical Society

    The Protocols of Indian Treaties As Developed by Benjamin Franklin and Other Members of the American Philosophical Society

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (Religious Studies) Department of Religious Studies 9-2015 How to Buy a Continent: The Protocols of Indian Treaties as Developed by Benjamin Franklin and Other Members of the American Philosophical Society Anthony F C Wallace University of Pennsylvania Timothy B. Powell University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/rs_papers Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, Religion Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Wallace, Anthony F C and Powell, Timothy B., "How to Buy a Continent: The Protocols of Indian Treaties as Developed by Benjamin Franklin and Other Members of the American Philosophical Society" (2015). Departmental Papers (Religious Studies). 15. https://repository.upenn.edu/rs_papers/15 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/rs_papers/15 For more information, please contact [email protected]. How to Buy a Continent: The Protocols of Indian Treaties as Developed by Benjamin Franklin and Other Members of the American Philosophical Society Abstract In 1743, when Benjamin Franklin announced the formation of an American Philosophical Society for the Promotion of Useful Knowledge, it was important for the citizens of Pennsylvania to know more about their American Indian neighbors. Beyond a slice of land around Philadelphia, three quarters of the province were still occupied by the Delaware and several other Indian tribes, loosely gathered under the wing of an Indian confederacy known as the Six Nations. Relations with the Six Nations and their allies were being peacefully conducted in a series of so-called “Indian Treaties” that dealt with the fur trade, threats of war with France, settlement of grievances, and the purchase of land.
  • By Robert A. Jockers D.D.S

    By Robert A. Jockers D.D.S

    By Robert A. Jockers D.D.S. erhaps the most significant factor in the settlement of identify the original settlers, where they came from, and Western Pennsylvania was an intangible energy known as specifically when and where they settled. In doing so it was the "Westward Movement.' The intertwined desires for necessary to detail the complexity of the settlement process, as well economic, political, and religious freedoms created a powerful as the political, economic, and social environment that existed sociological force that stimulated the formation of new and ever- during that time frame. changing frontiers. Despite the dynamics of this force, the In spite of the fact that Moon Township was not incorporated settlement of "Old Moon Township" - for this article meaning as a governmental entity within Allegheny County, Pa., until 1788, contemporary Moon Township and Coraopolis Borough - was numerous events of historical significance occurred during the neither an orderly nor a continuous process. Due in part to the initial settlement period and in the years prior to its incorporation. area's remote location on the English frontier, settlement was "Old Moon Township" included the settlement of the 66 original delayed. Political and legal controversy clouded the ownership of land grants that comprise today's Moon Township and the four its land. Transient squatters and land speculators impeded its that make up Coraopolis. This is a specific case study but is also a growth, and hostile Indian incursions during the American primer on the research of regional settlement patterns. Revolution brought about its demise. Of course, these lands were being contested in the 1770s.
  • Route of Meriwether Lewis from Harpers Ferry, Va. to Pittsburgh, Pa

    Route of Meriwether Lewis from Harpers Ferry, Va. to Pittsburgh, Pa

    Route of Meriwether Lewis from Harpers Ferry, Va. to Pittsburgh, Pa. July 8 – July 15, 1803 by David T. Gilbert National Park Service Harpers Ferry, West Virginia May 5, 2003 (Revised September 28, 2015) Introduction The route which Meriwether Lewis traveled from Harpers Ferry, Virginia to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, between July 8 and July 15, 1803, has not been well documented 1. The only primary source we have is a letter Lewis penned to President Jefferson from Harpers Ferry on July 8, 1803: I shall set out myself in the course of an hour, taking the route of Charlestown, Frankfort, Uniontown and Redstone old fort to Pittsburgh, at which place I shall most probably arrive on the 15th.2 Route of Meriwether Lewis July 8-July 15, 1803 Pittsburgh R Elizabeth E V I Petersons R Brownsville Pennsylvania O I H (Redstone old fort) O Uniontown Farmington POT OMA Cumberland C R IV Grantsville E M R O Maryland Forks of N Cacapon Harpers O N Fort Ashby Ferry G Brucetown A (Frankfort) H E Gainesboro L A Winchester R I West Virginia V Charles Town E R Virginia 1. With the exception of quoted primary sources, this document uses the contemporary spelling, Harpers Ferry, and not the 19th century spelling, Harper’s Ferry. Harpers Ferry was part of Virginia until June 20, 1863, when the state of West Virginia was created by Presidential Proclamation. 2. Meriwether Lewis to Thomas Jefferson, July 8, 1803, quoted in Donald Jackson,Letters of the Lewis and Clark Expedition, With Related Documents, 1783-1854 (Champaign, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1979), 106-107.
  • The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730--1795

    The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730--1795

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2005 The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795 Richard S. Grimes West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Grimes, Richard S., "The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795" (2005). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4150. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4150 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730-1795 Richard S. Grimes Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Mary Lou Lustig, Ph.D., Chair Kenneth A.
  • Hog Chains and Mark Twains: a Study of Labor History, Archaeology, and Industrial Ethnography of the Steamboat Era of the Monongahela Valley 1811-1950

    Hog Chains and Mark Twains: a Study of Labor History, Archaeology, and Industrial Ethnography of the Steamboat Era of the Monongahela Valley 1811-1950

    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports - Open Reports 2014 HOG CHAINS AND MARK TWAINS: A STUDY OF LABOR HISTORY, ARCHAEOLOGY, AND INDUSTRIAL ETHNOGRAPHY OF THE STEAMBOAT ERA OF THE MONONGAHELA VALLEY 1811-1950 Marc Nicholas Henshaw Michigan Technological University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Copyright 2014 Marc Nicholas Henshaw Recommended Citation Henshaw, Marc Nicholas, "HOG CHAINS AND MARK TWAINS: A STUDY OF LABOR HISTORY, ARCHAEOLOGY, AND INDUSTRIAL ETHNOGRAPHY OF THE STEAMBOAT ERA OF THE MONONGAHELA VALLEY 1811-1950", Dissertation, Michigan Technological University, 2014. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etds/790 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons HOG CHAINS AND MARK TWAINS: A STUDY OF LABOR HISTORY, ARCHAEOLOGY, AND INDUSTRIAL ETHNOGRAPHY OF THE STEAMBOAT ERA OF THE MONONGAHELA VALLEY 1811-1950 By Marc Nicholas Henshaw A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In Industrial Heritage and Archeology MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2014 This dissertation has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Industrial Heritage and Archeology Department of Social Sciences Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Susan Martin Committee Member: Dr. Hugh Gorman Committee Member: Dr. Carol MacLennan Committee Member: Dr. John Nass Department Chair: Dr.
  • From Indian Women to English Children: the Lenni-Lenape

    From Indian Women to English Children: the Lenni-Lenape

    FROM INDIAN WOMEN TO ENGLISH CHILDREN: THE LENNI-LENAPE AND THE ATTEMPT TO CREATE A NEW DIPLOMATIC IDENTITY RogerM. Carpenter University ofLouisiana at Monroe hile meeting with Pennsylvania representatives in 1757, the Lenni-Lenape sachem Teedyusung bitterly complained that he did not receive the same respect accorded Six Nations' diplomats. Employing the kinship terms that had long been a staple of native diplomacy, Teedyusung noted that his "Uncles"?the Iroquois?"were always stiled Men and had Tomahawks," while he had to carry "a pestle or hominy pounder," the tool of a woman.1 Teedyusung's negative reaction to this bit of gendered symbolism is telling, in that it illustrated the feelings of many Lenni-Lenape (also known as Delaware) concerning their treat ment as metaphorical "women" by the Iroquois. Employed in diplomatic dialogue between the two peoples from the late sev enteenth to themid-eighteenth century, themeaning of the term a as "woman" underwent series of changes, sometimes being used a mark of respect, and at other times being used in a derogatory manner. as on a new The Lenni-Lenape's status "women" took twist when English representatives, who frequently mimicked, PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY: A JOURNALOF MID-ATLANTIC STUDIES, VOL. 74, NO. I, 2007. Copyright ? 2007 The Pennsylvania Historical Association This content downloaded from 128.118.152.206 on Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:38:30 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions PENNSYLVANIA HISTDRY but just as frequently misunderstood, native use of gender and kinship terms brought their own interpretations of these expressions to the council fire.
  • English Duplicates of Lost Virginia Records

    English Duplicates of Lost Virginia Records

    T iPlCTP \jrIRG by Lot L I B RAHY OF THL UN IVER.SITY Of ILLINOIS 975.5 D4-5"e ILL. HJST. survey Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/englishduplicateOOdesc English Duplicates of Lost Virginia Records compiled by Louis des Cognets, Jr. © 1958, Louis des Cognets, Jr. P.O. Box 163 Princeton, New Jersey This book is dedicated to my grandmother ANNA RUSSELL des COGNETS in memory of the many years she spent writing two genealogies about her Virginia ancestors \ i FOREWORD This book was compiled from material found in the Public Record Office during the summer of 1957. Original reports sent to the Colonial Office from Virginia were first microfilmed, and then transcribed for publication. Some of the penmanship of the early part of the 18th Century was like copper plate, but some was very hard to decipher, and where the same name was often spelled in two different ways on the same page, the task was all the more difficult. May the various lists of pioneer Virginians contained herein aid both genealogists, students of colonial history, and those who make a study of the evolution of names. In this event a part of my debt to other abstracters and compilers will have been paid. Thanks are due the Staff at the Public Record Office for many heavy volumes carried to my desk, and for friendly assistance. Mrs. William Dabney Duke furnished valuable advice based upon her considerable experience in Virginia research. Mrs .Olive Sheridan being acquainted with old English names was especially suited to the secretarial duties she faithfully performed.