DOCSLIB.ORG

The Town of Brookhaven

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Town of Brookhaven DRAFT FORGE RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN NOVEMBER 2011 The Town of Brookhaven Prepared by In Association with Forge River Watershed Management Plan November 2011 Attribution This plan was prepared for the New York State Department of State Division of Coastal Resources with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. Cameron Engineering & Associates, LLP and CH2M Hill i Forge River Watershed Management Plan November 2011 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION AND SUBWATERSHED PRIORITIZATION ............................................... 1-1 1.3 EVALUATION AND RANKING OF MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ................................................................... 1-2 1.4 SHORT-TERM MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ................................................................................................ 1-3 1.4.1 Land Use Management ................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.4.2 Stormwater Management .............................................................................................................. 1-3 1.4.3 Nitrogen Reduction ....................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4.4 Water Quality Improvements and Habitat Restoration ................................................................. 1-4 1.4.5 Research and Data Collection ...................................................................................................... 1-4 1.4.6 Training, Education, and Stewardship Programs ......................................................................... 1-4 1.5 MID-TERM MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES .................................................................................................... 1-5 1.5.1 Land Use Management ................................................................................................................. 1-5 1.5.2 Stormwater Management .............................................................................................................. 1-5 1.5.3 Nitrogen Reduction ....................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.5.4 Water Quality Improvements and Habitat Restoration ................................................................. 1-6 1.5.5 Research and Data Collection ...................................................................................................... 1-6 1.6 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ................................................................................................. 1-7 1.6.1 Land Use Management ................................................................................................................. 1-7 1.6.2 Nitrogen Reduction ....................................................................................................................... 1-7 1.6.3 Water Quality Improvements and Habitat Restoration ................................................................. 1-7 1.7 PHASING OF MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES .................................................................................................. 1-8 1.7.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................... 1-8 1.8 PHASING OF SHORT-TERM MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ............................................................................ 1-9 1.9 PHASING OF MID-TERM MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES .............................................................................. 1-11 1.10 PHASING OF LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ........................................................................... 1-13 Cameron Engineering & Associates, LLP and CH2M Hill ii Forge River Watershed Management Plan November 2011 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION 2 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 2-1 3 WATERSHED AND SUBWATERSHED DELINEATIONS ..................................................................... 3-1 3.1 DELINEATION METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 GROUNDWATER CONTRIBUTING AREAS ................................................................................................... 3-3 3.3 STORMWATER CONTRIBUTING AREAS ...................................................................................................... 3-3 3.3.1 Stormwater Collection and Infiltration Systems ........................................................................... 3-3 3.3.2 Stormwater Collection and Direct Outfall Systems ...................................................................... 3-5 3.3.3 Direct Runoff Contributing Areas ................................................................................................. 3-5 3.4 SUBWATERSHED AREAS ............................................................................................................................ 3-6 4 GEOGRAPHIC SETTING ............................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 DATA SOURCES AND MAPS ....................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.2 TOPOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................................ 4-3 4.3 HYDROLOGY ............................................................................................................................................. 4-5 4.4 FLOOD ZONES ........................................................................................................................................... 4-9 4.5 PRECIPITATION .......................................................................................................................................... 4-9 4.6 INFRASTRUCTURE ..................................................................................................................................... 4-9 4.6.1 Drainage ....................................................................................................................................... 4-9 4.6.2 Sanitary ....................................................................................................................................... 4-10 4.7 GEOGRAPHIC SETTING SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 4-10 5 LAND USE ...................................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 CURRENT LAND USE ................................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 PROJECTED LAND USE / BUILD-OUT ANALYSIS ........................................................................................ 5-3 5.3 LAND USE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 5-5 6 LAND COVER ................................................................................................................................................ 6-1 6.1 CLASSIFICATION METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 6-1 6.2 LAND COVER CHARACTERISTICS AND DISTRIBUTION ............................................................................... 6-2 6.3 LAND COVER SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 6-6 7 SOCIOECONOMICS ..................................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 POPULATION ............................................................................................................................................. 7-1 7.2 INCOME ..................................................................................................................................................... 7-3 7.3 ECONOMIC IMPACTS .................................................................................................................................. 7-4 7.3.1 Housing Values ............................................................................................................................. 7-4 7.3.2 Recreational Fishing ..................................................................................................................... 7-6 7.3.3 Economic Impact Summary........................................................................................................... 7-6 8 LIVING AQUATIC RESOURCES ............................................................................................................... 8-1 8.1 KEY AQUATIC HABITATS .........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Open PDF File, 1.14 MB, for Taunton River Watershed 2001
    APPENDIX A TAUNTON RIVER WATERSHED DWM YEAR 2001 WATER QUALITY MONITORING DATA Technical Memorandum TM-62-6 DWM Control Number: 94.1 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ELLEN ROY HERZFELDER, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ROBERT W. GOLLEDGE JR., COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GLENN HAAS, DIRECTOR Taunton River Watershed 2001 Water Quality Assessment Report Appendix A A1 62wqar.doc DWM CN 94.0 Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................A3 Project Objectives .............................................................................................................................A3 Field and Analytical Methods .............................................................................................................A4 Survey Conditions...........................................................................................................................A12 Water Quality Data .........................................................................................................................A17 References Cited ............................................................................................................................A34 Appendix 1 - Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data Validation .......................................................A35 Appendix 2 - 2001 Data Symbols and Qualifiers ..............................................................................A42
    [Show full text]
  • Taunton, MA Waterbody Assessment, 305(B)/303(D)
    MA62-10_2008 MA62-22_2008 MA62-32_2008 Matfield River (5) Satucket River (2) Coweeset Brook (3) 106 West 28 123 MA62-13_2008 Bridgewater Town River (3) Mansfield Easton MA62106_2008 MA62-12_2008 MA62-13_2008 Hockomock River Little Cedar Swamp (3) Town River (3) Town River (3) MA62203_2008 Town Black Brook River Fuller Hammond Ward Pond (3) MA62-35_2008 TownTown RiverRiver Pond Hockomock River (3) MA62134_2008 MA62158_2008 MA62-11_2008 Norton Reservoir (5) Reservoir (3) Town River (3) MA62-27_2008 South Brook 138 South Brook Canoe River (2) MA62-31_2008 Mulberry Meadow Brook (3) Carver Canoe River Pond MA62033_2008 Norton MA62213_2008 Carver Pond (4c) Reservoir Winnecunnet Pond (4c) MA62131_2008 Norton Lake Nippenicket (4c) (TMDL) 140 Bridgewater Winnecunnet MA62-28_2008 Lake 18 Pond Nippenicket MA62-40_2008 Snake River (3) 495 Rumford River Rumford River Rumford River (2) Watson Sawmill Brook SnowsBrook 104 SnowsBrook Pond MA62007_2008 MA62-56_2008 MA62-36_2008 Barrowsville Pond (3) Three Mile River (5) MA62166_2008 MA62088_2008 Sawmill Brook (3) Barrowsville MA62084_2008 MA62205_2008 Lake Sabbatia (5) Hewitt Pond (3) Gushee PondMA62-49_2008 Pond Gushee Pond (4c) Watson Pond (5) Otis Pratt Brook Wading River (5) Meadow Sabbatia Lake Kings Brook Pond Prospect Hill MA62101_2008 Pond Pond MA62228_2008 Mill Kings Pond (3) 24 MA62113_2008 River Johnson Bassett Brook Whittenton Impoundment (4c) Pond Meadow Brook Pond (3) MA62149_2008 Birch Brook Prospect Hill Pond (3) MA62097_2008 Middleborough MA62-56_2008 Three Mile River (5) MA62136_2008
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of New York State Interdepartmental Committee on Indian Affairs, 1973-74
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 103 184 RC 008 414 AUTHOR Hathorn, John R. TITLE Annual Report of New York State Interdepartmental Committee on Indian Affairs, 1973-74. INSTITUTION New York State Interdepartmental Committee on Indian Affairs, Albany. PUB DATE 74 NOTE 35p.; For related documents, see ED 032 959; ED 066 279-280; ED 080 267 EDRS PRICE NF-$0.76 HC-$1.95 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTJRS *American Indians; *Innual Reports; Clinics; Committees; Educational Finance; Expenditures; Health Services; Leadership; Legislation; *Reservations (Indian); *Services; Social Services; *State Programs; Transportation IDENTIFIERS *New York ABSTPACT The purpose and function of the New York State Interdepartmental Committee on Indian Affairs is to render, through the several state departments and agencies represented, various services to the 8 American Indian reservations (Cattaraugus, St. Regis, Tonawanda, Tuscarora, Allegany, Onandaga, Shinpecock, and Poospatuck) located within the boundaries of New York. This 1973-74 annual report describes the various services rendered by the State Departments of Commerce, Education, Health, Transportation, and Social Services. Information is given on educational programs, clinic services, general nursing services, dental services, transportation, social services, housing, and foster care. The 1973 post-session and the 1974 legislative session activities of the State Assembly Subcommittee on Indian Affairs, which serves as advocate for the Indian people, are briefly discussed. Addresses of the Interdepartmental Committee members and of the Indian Reservation leaders and officials are included. (NQ) a BEST COPY AVAILABLE r ANNUAL REPORT \ Ui of NEW YORK STATE INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE on INDIAN AFFAIRS 19731974 us otomermaNY OF WEALTH InluontoPi aWEIS AO* NATIONAL INSTITUTEor EDUCATION DOCUMENT HAS BEEN IIrrRO O's.,CEO fxAtit,v AS REtt IvEo 1;oM 1HE PERSON OR ORGANIZA T1ON OalcoN A +NG IT POINTS Or VIEW OR °Pt N IONS STATED DO NOT NtcEssmaiLv REPRE SENT erg ictm.
    [Show full text]
  • Stony Brook University
    SSStttooonnnyyy BBBrrrooooookkk UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy The official electronic file of this thesis or dissertation is maintained by the University Libraries on behalf of The Graduate School at Stony Brook University. ©©© AAAllllll RRRiiiggghhhtttsss RRReeessseeerrrvvveeeddd bbbyyy AAAuuuttthhhooorrr... Indigenous Identity at the Poospatuck Reservation: Implications for Culturally Grounded Social Work Practice and Policy A Dissertation Presented by Catherine A. Carballeira to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Social Welfare Stony Brook University May 2011 Copyright by Catherine Carballeira 2011 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Catherine A. Carballeira We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation. Joel Blau, DSW, Dissertation Advisor Professor of Social Policy and Director of the Ph.D. Program, School of Social Welfare Angel Campos, Ed.D. Chairperson of Defense Associate Professor and Executive Associate Dean, School of Social Welfare Ruth Brandwein, Ph.D. Professor of Social Policy and former Dean, School of Social Welfare Carolyn G. Peabody, Ph.D. Clinical Assistant Professor and Assistant Dean for Eastern LI sites, School of Social Welfare John Strong, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Department of History, Southampton College This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School Lawrence Martin Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Dissertation Indigenous
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 106-318 106Th Congress An
    114 STAT. 1278 PUBLIC LAW 106-318—OCT. 19, 2000 Public Law 106-318 106th Congress An Act n f IQ 9nnn "^^ amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the Taunton — ' — River in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for study for potential addition [H.R. 2778] to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of Taunton River the United States of America in Congress assembled. Wild and Scenic River Study Act SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 16 use 1271 This Act may be cited as the "Taunton River Wild and Scenic note. River study Act of 2000". SEC. 2. FINDINGS. Congress finds that— (1) the Taunton River in the Commonwealth of Massachu­ setts possesses important resource values (including wildlife, ecological, and scenic values), historic sites, and a cultural past important to the heritage of the United States; (2) there is strong support among State and local officials, area residents, and river users for a cooperative wild and scenic river study of the area; and (3) there is a longstanding interest among State and local officials, area residents, and river users in undertaking a con­ certed cooperative effort to manage the river in a productive and meaningful way. SEC. 3. DESIGNATION FOR STUDY. Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(a)) is amended— (1) by designating the undesignated paragraph following (135) as paragraph (136); and (2) by adding at the end the following: "(137) TAUNTON RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS.—^The segment down­ stream from the headwaters, from the confluence of the Town River and the Matfield River in Bridgewater to the confluence with the Forge River in Rajniham, Massachusetts.".
    [Show full text]
  • Your Source for Summer News on the South Shore
    Compliments of Volume 64 | Issue Two FREE ® Fire Island’s Longest Running News Source Since 1957 July 24, 2020 Your Source for Summer News on the South Shore www.fireisland-news.com THE FIRE ISLAND NEWSPAPER • July 24, 2020 • PAGE 3 Volume 64 | Issue Two ® Fire Island’s Longest Running News Source Since 1957 July 24, 2020 IN THIS ISSUE IN EVERY ISSUE 7 INTERVIEW: 21 ADULT COLORING VANOY HARRIS PAGE Emma Boskovski Lauren Stevens 8 FALLEN IDOLS OF FIRE 18 BOOK REVIEW ISLAND (PART 2) Rita Plush Emma Boskovski 12 DAY IN THE LIFE 10 OBITUARIES: OF FIRE ISLAND GRETCHEN STANG Contributed Photos Joey Macellaro 22 ENVIRONMENT LILLIAN BARBASH Karl Grossman Rebecca Hoey 17 POLICE BLOTTER 16 DESTROYING FI PINES Shoshanna McCollum MEDIA BACKLASH Laura Schmidt 19 FIFLIX: “LAST FERRY” ONLINE THIS Hugh O’Brien ISSUE 20 ISLAND MERMAID: www.fireisland-news.com REFLECTING UPON 30 YEARS > CORONAVIRUS AND Scott Hirsch THE FERRIES Mariana Dominguez > DINING REVIEW: COMMUNITY MATTHEW’S SEAFOOD HOUSE COLUMNS Shoshanna McCollum 9 SALTAIRE Hugh O’Brien > EYE ON FI Timothy Bolger 11 OCEAN BEACH AREA Joey Macellaro > HISTORY Thomas McGann 13 OCEAN BAY PARK Barbara Gaby Placilla > NYC THEATRE: IN MEMORIAM 15 CHERRY GROVE/ Leonard Feigenblatt FIRE ISLAND PINES Robert Levine Fire Island’s Longest Running News Source since 1957 Cartoons by Eric Pedersen PUBLISHER ...................................Craig Low EDITOR ........................................Shoshanna McCollum @finews MANAGING EDITOR ..................Lorna Luniewski REPORTERS Emma Boskovski, Mariana Dominguez,
    [Show full text]
  • Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Draft Report and Environmental Assessment June 2007
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Draft Report and Environmental Assessment June 2007 National Park Service 1 Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Draft Report and Environmental Assessment 2007 Prepared by National Park Service, Northeast Region In Cooperation with: » Southeast Region Planning and Economic Development District » Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Committee Project Manager: Jamie Fosburgh, Rivers Program Manager, NER-Boston Poject Team: Bill Napolitano Project Leader, SRPEDD Rachel Calabro Principal Author, Taunton River Stewardship Plan, SRPEDD/ MA Riverways Nancy Durfee Outreach & Volunteers, SRPEDD Karen Porter & Maisy McDarby-Stanovich Mapping & Web Page, SRPEDD Special Thanks: Jim Ross Chair, Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Committee Comments on this Draft Report can be sent to: Jamie Fosburgh National Park Service 15 State Street Boston MA 02109 (617) 223-5191 [email protected] Please visit www.tauntonriver.org for more information and links related to the Wild and Scenic River Study, Wild and Scenic River Study Committee, Taunton River Stewardship Plan, and the Taunton River. Companion Document: Taunton River Stewardship Plan, July 2005 Cover Photo: Rachel Calabro. Broad Cove, Dighton. Table of Contents Taunton Wild and Scenic Rivers Study Draft Report and Environmental Assessment 2-4 Summary of Findings 5-7 Chapter I. 5 Background and Need 8-14 Chapter II. 8 Eligibility and Classification Findings (The Affected Environment) 15-19 Chapter III. 15 Suitability Findings (Management Context) 20-25 Chapter IV. 20 Identification and Comparison of Alternatives 27-35 Maps 28-29 Study Area Map 30-31 Eligibility and Classification Findings 32-33 Alternative B: Full Designation 34-35 Alternative C: Designation to Steep Brook (N.
    [Show full text]
  • PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Volume 1 of 4
    PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Volume 1 of 4 COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ABINGTON, TOWN OF 250259 BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250260 BROCKTON, CITY OF 250261 CARVER, TOWN OF 250262 DUXBURY, TOWN OF 250263 EAST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250264 HALIFAX, TOWN OF 250265 HANOVER, TOWN OF 250266 HANSON, TOWN OF 250267 HINGHAM, TOWN OF 250268 HULL, TOWN OF 250269 KINGSTON, TOWN OF 250270 LAKEVILLE, TOWN OF 250271 MARION, TOWN OF 255213 MARSHFIELD, TOWN OF 250273 MATTAPOISETT, TOWN OF 255214 MIDDLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250275 NORWELL, TOWN OF 250276 PEMBROKE, TOWN OF 250277 PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF 250278 PLYMPTON, TOWN OF 250279 ROCHESTER, TOWN OF 250280 ROCKLAND, TOWN OF 250281 SCITUATE, TOWN OF 250282 WAREHAM, TOWN OF 255223 WEST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250284 WHITMAN, TOWN OF 250285 REVISED NOVEMBER 4, 2016 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25023CV001C NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this Preliminary FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS
    [Show full text]
  • Reservation Prices: an Economic Analysis of Cigarette
    Reservation Prices: An Economic Analysis of Cigarette Purchases on Indian Reservations1 Philip DeCicca NBER & Department of Economics McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario Canada [email protected] Donald Kenkel NBER Department of Policy Analysis & Management Department of Economics Cornell University Ithaca NY 14850 [email protected] Feng Liu School of Economics Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Shanghai 200433, China [email protected] April 2013 1This research was supported by # R21 CA131600-01A1 from the National Institutes of Health. We thank Daniel Kenkel for excellent legal research assistance. ABSTRACT The special legal status of Indian tribes in the U.S. means that state excise taxes are not necessarily collected on cigarette purchases on Indian reservations. We focus on two under- studied but basic empirical economic questions this raises. Using novel data from national and New York surveys that asked directly about cigarette prices and purchases from reservations, we first ask: What is the economic incidence of the tax break? In national data, we find evidence that the tax break is often approximately fully shifted to the consumer. However, the patterns are complex due to the variety of approaches different states have taken towards taxing reservation purchases. In data from New York over a period when the state did not attempt to collect taxes on reservation purchases, our estimates suggest that the tax break is usually fully shifted to the consumer. The notable exception is on one reservation where a tribal monopoly captures almost half of the tax break. Second, we ask: Has the tax break increased consumer demand for low- quality cigarettes relative to high-quality cigarettes? New York’s cigarette tax is a fixed amount per pack, providing an opportunity to test the Alchian and Allen substitution theorem.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol 1, Number 1 July 22-29, 2006
    The Long Island Native & Black History UPDATE Volume 1, Number 1 July 22 – 29, 2006 [Reprint] Jul 25, 2006 On NY1 Now: News All Morn (http://www.ny1.com/ny1/OnTheAir/program_guide.jsp) Memorial To Be Built At African, Native American Burial Ground In Queens By Roger Clark A Queens’s playground is being transformed, as the city pays homage to the ancestors of both African and Native Americans. NY1's Roger Clark has more in the following report. Across the street from the Flushing cemetery is the final resting place for 1,000 people. But there are no headstones or landscaping - it's a playground built over a graveyard in the 1930's by the city. “It was inconceivable that you would make a playground out of a cemetery,” says activist Mandingo Tshaka of Bayside. “I’ve never heard of such a thing.” Beneath the asphalt is the burial place of mostly African and Native Americans buried in a potter's field from the 19th century. Now, a 15-year campaign to make the site a memorial park by Tshaka, who has ancestors buried in the field, is becoming a reality. “We're going to have lots of planting, benches, pathways, a new playground, [and] I think it’s going to be a wonderful amenity for the neighborhood," says Angelyn Chandler of the Parks Department. The 3.5-acre site will be surrounded by iron fencing, and there will also be a memorial to those buried there. Getting to this point wasn't easy because some residents weren't happy about losing a playground.
    [Show full text]
  • Mastic Beach/Smith Point of Shirley
    NY Rising Community Reconstruction Program NY Rising Community Reconstruction Plan MASTIC BEACH/SMITH POINT OF SHIRLEY VILLAGE BOATING FISHING HISTORY SCHOOL SPORTS YMCA SKATE PARK WETLANDS THE LIBRARYHISTORY MANOR AT ST GEORGE PEOPLE close to ocean VILLAGE HARD WORKING PEOPLE WILDLIFE WERTHEIM WILDLIFE REFUGE TRI HAMLET NEWS THE THE WM FLOYD COMMUNITY SUMMIT NATURAL PRESERVES LIBRARY WETLANDS OSPREY POINTE HARD WORK waterfront & beachesWETLANDS THE WETLANDS PEOPLE POOSPATUCK RESERVATION OSPREY POINTE WILLIAM FLOYD HARD WORK FISHING AND ESTATE THE THE OUR PEOPLE THE LIBRARYschool sports BOATING YMCA LIBRARY THE VILLAGE william floyd estate GREAT HISTORY SKATE PARK THE POOSPATUCK COLONIAL YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES WILDLIFE FAMILIES NATURAL WILDLIFE WILLIAM RESERVATION CLOSE TO SCHOOL FLOYD SCHOOLS MANOR AT CARING COMMUNITY SPORTS PRESERVES GREAT FAMILIES THE OCEAN BEAUTIFUL THE WETLANDS ST GEORGE great families THE VILLAGE OUR HISTORY PEOPLE MB PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE HISTORYWETLANDS WILDLIFE close to the OSPREY POINTEBEACHES GREAT FAMILIES WATERFRONT OSPREY POINT POOSPATUCK RESERVATION SCHOOL SPORTS GREAT FAMILIES VILLAGEOCEANTRI HAMLET NEWS THE WETLANDS NATURAL PRESERVES WERTHEIM WILDLIFE REFUGE LIBRARY MASTIC SPORTS CLUB BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE FISHING AND BOATING YMCA SKATE PARK WILLIAM FLOYD SCHOOLS CLOSE TO OCEAN MANOR AT ST GEORGE THE WILDLIFE HISTOR BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE CARING COMMUNITY TRI-HAMLET SPORTS CLUB HARD WORKING PEOPLE MARCH 2014 Mastic Beach and Smith Point of Shirley ‐ NY Rising Community Reconstruction Plan This document was developed by the Mastic Beach and Smith Point of Shirley Planning Committee as part of the NY Rising Community Reconstruction (NYRCR) Program within the Governor’s Office of Storm Recovery (GOSR). The NYRCR Program is supported by NYS Homes and Community Renewal, NYS Department of State, and NYS Department of Transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Continuity Assessment in the Taunton River Watershed
    Stream Continuity Assessment in the Taunton Watershed June 2017 Stream Continuity Assessment in the Taunton River Watershed Table of Contents Executive Summary p. 5 1. The Importance of Stream Continuity p. 8 2. The Taunton River, its Tributaries and Watershed p. 12 3. Regulatory Standards to Protect Streams p. 18 4. Programs to Identify Priorities for Crossing Upgrade/Replacement p. 19 in Massachusetts A. Geographic Roadway Runoff Inventory Program B. BioMap2 C. Conservation Assessment and Prioritization System (CAPS) D. Critical Linkages Project E. River and Stream Continuity Project/NAACC 5. Stream Crossing Assessment Procedure p. 24 6. Overview of Findings of the Taunton River Watershed Stream Crossing p. 27 Surveys 7. Taunton River Watershed Sites with Significant Potential for Ecological p. 35 Restoration 8. Stream Crossing Success Story p. 45 9. What Cities and Towns Can Do p. 47 Appendix A: Stream Crossings Listed by Town Appendix B: Stream Crossings Listed by Sub-watershed Appendix C: Additional Tables: Table 9. Crossings in Poor or Damaged Condition Table 10. Crossings with Severe Constriction Table 11. Crossings with Skewed Alignment Table 12. Crossings with Inlet and Outlet Drops Table 13. Unassessed Sites Ranked as Tier 1 or 2 1 List of Tables1 Table 1. Number of Sites Surveyed by Municipality with Barrier Evaluation p. 28 Table 2. Crossings Identified as Severe or Significant Barriers to Aquatic p. 29 Passage Table 3. Number of Crossings Surveyed and Barrier Evaluation by p. 31 Sub-watershed Table 4. Example of Information from Database p. 34 Table 5. Highest Priority Sites for Ecological Restoration p. 35 Table 6.
    [Show full text]