DOCSLIB.ORG

William M. Bass Page 1 CURRICULUM VITAE NAME

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

William M. Bass Page 1 CURRICULUM VITAE NAME: William Marvin Bass, III DATE AND PLACE OF BIRTH: August 30, 1928; Staunton, Virginia MARRIED: August 8, 1953. Mary Ann (Owen) Bass, Ph.D. 1971 Kansas State University, Food Science and Nutrition. DECEASED March 27, 1993 Three sons, March 1, 1956; November 2, 1962; July 14, 1964. Married May 21, 1994. Annette C. Blackbourne. DECEASED May 25, 1997. Married December 17, 1997. Carol H. Miles. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: B.A. 1951 (Psychology) University of Virginia M.S. 1956 (Anthropology) University of Kentucky Ph.D. 1961 (Anthropology) University of Pennsylvania Dissertation title: Variation in the physical types of the prehistoric Plains Indians. Written in connection with the Smithsonian Institution and published as Memoir I of the Plains Anthropologist. D.A.B.F.A. 1978 Diplomate American Board of Forensic Anthropology Psychological (and Anthropological) Research Assistant, (Army), Army Medical Research Laboratory, Fort Knox, Kentucky, 1951-53. Psychophysiologist, (Civilian), Army Medical Research Laboratory, search in applied physical anthropology (Human Engineering), 1953-54. Personnel Counselor, Counseling Office, University of Kentucky, September, 1954 - June, 1955. Administrative Assistant, Counseling Office, University of Kentucky, June, 1955 - November, 1955. Acting Director of Counseling Office (upon death of Dr. Lyle W. Croft, Director, and until a Ph.D. could be obtained to fill the position), November, 1955 - June, 1956. FORMAL TEACHING EXPERIENCE: Instructor in Physical Anthropology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, September, 1956 - January, 1960. Teaching Physical Anthropology and Anatomy and research in growth and development of children. Instructor in Anthropology, Department of Anthropology, University of Nebraska, January, 1960 - August, 1960. Instructor in Anthropology, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Kansas, September, 1960 - June, 1961. Assistant Professor of Anthropology, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Kansas, July, 1961 - June, 1964. Associate Professor of Anthropology, Department of Anthropology, University of Kansas, July, 1964 - June, 1967. Professor of Anthropology, Department of Anthropology, University of Kansas, July, 1967 - June, 1971. Professor and Head, Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, June, 1971 – May, 1992. Professor and Director, Forensic Anthropology Center, University of Tennessee, May, 1992 - December, 1994. Professor Emeritus and Director, Forensic Anthropology Center, University of Tennessee, December, 1994 - August 1998. Professor Emeritus, September 1998 - Present. William M. Bass Page 2 RESEARCH EXPERIENCE: Summers 1956 - 1959 Physical Anthropologist, River Basin Surveys, Smithsonian Institution. Laboratory analysis in Washington, D.C. and supervisor of burial excavations in South Dakota. 1960 Laboratory and field research for University of Nebraska. 1961 - 1970 Field Director for National Science Foundation and National Geographic Society funded field excavations of human skeletons in Northern and Central Plains area. 1964 Three months excavating burials in Azerbaijan, Iran. 1974 Two months removing a historic German-Lutheran cemetery for Tennessee Department of Highways. GRANTS AND FELLOWSHIPS Graduate Research Grant, University of Pennsylvania, Summer 1959. Faculty Research Grant, University of Nebraska, Summer 1960. General Research Grant, University of Kansas, Academic years 1961-68. National Park Service Grant 1963, 1966. NSF Undergraduate Research Program 1963, 1964, 1966, 1968. Wenner-Gren Travel Grant to Iran 1964. NSF grants to excavate in South Dakota 1962, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1970. National Geographic grant to excavate in South Dakota 1968, 1969. HONORS University of Kansas "Hill Teacher" - Outstanding Teacher Award 1964. 1,000 H. Bernerd Fink Award for excellence in classroom teaching 1965, University of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Alumni Public Service Award 1975. Alumni Distinguished Professor 1978 - $3,000 annual salary supplement. Macebearer, University of Tennessee 1985-86. Omicron Delta Kappa, National Leadership Honor Society 1984. American Academy of Forensic Sciences Physical Anthropology Award in Recognition of Outstanding Contributions to the Forensic Sciences 1985. Professor of the Year Finalist by The Council for Advancement and Support of Education 1984-85. National Professor of the Year by The Council for Advancement and Support of Education 1985-86. Honored at a joint session of the Senate and House of Representatives of the State of Tennessee for Outstanding Contribution to Higher Education 1986. Phi Kappa Phi, National Honor Society 1985-present. National College of District Attorneys - Lecturer of Merit Award, 1986. Sigma Xi National Lecturer 1987-88; 1988-89. Ida Beam Distinguished Visiting Professor, University of Iowa, Spring 1987. Eminent Scholar - Jacksonville State University, Jacksonville, Alabama 1988. Phi Kappa Phi, Academic Scholar Award $500, Spring 1991. Phi Betta Kappa, Elected Member, Spring 1993. Alexander Prize, Ideal Undergraduate teacher-scholar award from University of Tennessee $5000, Spring 1993. Distinguished Fellow Award, American Academy of Forensic Sciences, San Antonio Meeting, 1994. Chancellor's Citation: Extraordinary Service to the University, April 1994. Faculty Study in Hodges Library named in my honor, September 1995. William M. Bass Page 3 Halbert E. Fillinger Lifetime of Distinguished Service in Forensic Research, Vidocq Society 2003. University of Kentucky Distinguished Alumni. Total number of alumni honored has been 263 out of 232,187 graduates, 2004. Seventh recipient of the Adelaide Medal from the International Association of Forensic Sciences for “your work, dedication, and service to forensic sciences over the many years of your long and distinguished career.” 2008. Inductee into the Class of 2008 University of Kentucky “College of Arts and Sciences Hall of Fame.” 2008. BOOK DEDICATION In recognition for my research in the prehistory of the Plains Area the following book was dedicated to me. Jantz, Richard L. and Douglas W. Owsley 1994 Skeletal Biology in the Great Plains: Migration, Warfare, Health, and Subsistence. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Symposium in Honor of William M. Bass by his students. Friday, February 18, 1994, American Academy of Forensic Sciences. Papers presented at this symposium published in the Vol. 40, No. 5 issue of the Journal of Forensic Sciences, pages 727-788. CONTINUING PUBLIC SERVICE 1971-Present Consultant to Tennessee State Medical Examiners Systems as State Forensic Anthropologist. 1973-2000 Visiting Faculty to The Tennessee Law Enforcement Training Academy. 1982-Present Consultant to Tennessee Bureau of Investigation in Forensic Anthropology. 1984-Present Consultant to United States Air Force Mortuary Services. 1986-Present Consultant to United States Armed Services Graves Registration Office (ASGRO). MILITARY SERVICE Entered Army November 15, 1951. Basic training Infantry. Transferred to Medical Corps in March, 1952 and served as Research Assistant in Audition and Vibration Branch, Army Medical Research Laboratory, Fort Knox, Kentucky. Honorable discharge November 16, 1953. PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS American Academy of Forensic Sciences (Fellow), President, Physical Anthropology Section 1983 Distinguished Fellow Award 1994 Plains Conference for Anthropology Tennessee Archaeological Society, Secretary-Treasurer and Editor Tennessee Archaeologist, 1972-75. Tennessee Anthropological Association, Secretary-Treasurer 1975- present. Sigma Xi, UT Chapter Vice President 1982; President 1983 EDITORIAL BOARDS William M. Bass Page 4 American Journal of Physical Anthropology 1986-1991. Journal of Forensic Sciences 1989-2004. Forensic Science Review 1989-Present. ETHICS COMMITTEE American Academy of Forensic Sciences 1989-1992. William M. Bass Page 5 PUBLICATIONS 1. Loeb, M., W. M. Bass, E. E. Roberts and M. L. Samuelsen 1955 A further investigation of the influence of whole-body vibration and noise on tremor and visual acuity. Report No. 165, A.M.R.L. Project No. 6-95-20-001. Army Medical Research Laboratory, Ft. Knox, Kentucky. 2. Bass, William M. 1958 The application of physical anthropology to the question of differential maturation in relation to race. Bulletin of the Philadelphia Anthropological Society, Vol. II, No. 3, May. Philadelphia. 3. 1958 Addendum to the skeletal report of the Sweat Bee Mound Site, 14PO14. Abstract. River Basin Survey Papers B.A.E. Bulletin 169, p. 78, Washington. 4. 1960 Variation in physical types of the Aboriginal Plains Indians. Abstract of a paper given at the Seventieth Annual Meeting of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences. Proceedings of the Seventieth Annual Meeting of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences. April. 5. 1960 Human skeletal remains from Pictograph and Ghost Caves by Snodgrasse. A book review. Plains Anthropologist 5(10):90. 6. 1960 A comparative study of the sequence and time of appearance of maturity indicators in the hand of White, Negro and Chinese children in the U. S. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 18(4):339-340. 7. 1961 A preliminary study of human skeletal material from archaeological sites in Nebraska. Plains Anthropologist 6(12):Part 1 and 2, pp. 59-60 and 108-109. 8. 1961 The laboratory excavation of a Woodland type ossuary. Abstract of a paper read at the 18th Plains Conference, Norman, Oklahoma. Plains Anthropologist 6(12):60. 9. 1961 Human skeletal material from
Recommended publications
  • Tiffany B. Saul

    Tiffany B. Saul

    Tiffany B. Saul Middle Tennessee State University Forensic Institute for Research and Education 1301 East Main Street Box 89 Wiser-Patten Science Hall 106H Murfreesboro, TN 37132 [email protected] Education 2013-2017 Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Anthropology, University of Tennessee 2010-2013 Master of Science (MS) in Biology, Middle Tennessee State University 1998-2002 Bachelor of Science (BS) in Anthropology, Middle Tennessee State University Academic Appointments 2017-present Research Assistant Professor, Middle Tennessee State University (Forensic Institute for Research and Education and Dept. of Anthropology) 2015-2017 Graduate Research Assistant, University of Tennessee (Dept. of Anthropology) 2014-2015 Graduate Teaching Assistant, University of Tennessee (Anthropology & Biology) 2013 (Fall) Graduate Research Assistant, University of Tennessee (Dept. of Anthropology) 2012-2013 Graduate Research Assistant, Forensic Institute for Research and Education 2010-2012 NSF Graduate Fellow, Middle Tennessee State University Teaching Experience 2017 World Prehistory (ANTH 2210/ 1 section-MTSU), Instructor 2016 Basic Forensic Crime Scene Processing School (TBI), Presenter 2016 Forensic Skeletal Search and Recovery Course (MTSU), Instructor 2016 Biometrics Field Training (FBI Fly Team), Instructor 2015 Human Origins (ANTH 110/1 section-UTK), Instructor 2014-2015 Human Osteology Lab (ANTH 480/3 sections-UTK), Teaching Assistant 2014 General Biology for Non-majors Lab (BIOL 102/ 2 sections-UTK), Instructor 2013 Career and Technical Education (CTE) Workshop, Session Director 2012 Basic Forensic Crime Scene Processing School (TBI), Presenter 2012-2013 NSF TRIAD GK-12 Program, Program Master Fellow 2011-2012 Career and Technical Education (CTE) Workshop, Curriculum Developer 2011 Homicide Investigation Course (TBI), Instructor Assistant 2011-2014 CSI: MTSU Summer Camp, Curriculum Developer and Instructor 2010-2012 NSF TRIAD GK-12 Program, Visiting Scientist/Research Mentor 2010 CSI: MTSU Summer Camp, Assistant Instructor T.
  • Str Analysis of Human Dna from Maggots Fed on Decomposing Bodies: Assessment on the Time Period for Successful Analysis

    Str Analysis of Human Dna from Maggots Fed on Decomposing Bodies: Assessment on the Time Period for Successful Analysis

    STR ANALYSIS OF HUMAN DNA FROM MAGGOTS FED ON DECOMPOSING BODIES: ASSESSMENT ON THE TIME PERIOD FOR SUCCESSFUL ANALYSIS M.Sc. Thesis By: Njau Daniel Gachuiri Reg. No. H56/65991/2010 Department of Biochemistry A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of a Masters degree of Science in Biochemistry Department of Biochemistry School of Medicine, College of Health Science University of Nairobi September 2013 DECLARATION This is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other university. Mr. Njau Daniel Gachuiri, BSc. Biochemistry (UON). Department of Biochemistry University of Nairobi Signature: …………………………………….Date: …………………………………….. This Thesis has been submitted with our approval as university supervisors Dr. E. K. Muge Department of Biochemistry, University of Nairobi Signature……………………………………...Date:…………………………………….. Ms Sophie Mukwana Biotech Forensics Signature...........................................................Date: ……………………………………. Prof. C. O. A. Omwandho Department of Biochemistry, University of Nairobi Signature……………………………………..Date: ……………………………………. Prof. P.W. Kinyanjui Department of Biochemistry, University of Nairobi Signature……………………………………..Date: …………………………………….. i Chairman Department of Biochemistry, University of Nairobi Signature……………………………………...Date: …………………………………….. ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my family members and friends who provided me with moral and financial support throughout my studies. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I am very grateful to the following individuals and organizations that contributed towards successful completion of this research work. First and foremost, I would like to thank God for His wisdom and guidance throughout my life and studies. I express my sincere gratitude to my supervisors Ms Sophie Mukwana (Biotech Forensics- Kenya) and Dr. E. K. Muge, Prof. C. O. A. Omwandho and Prof. P.W. Kinyanjui (Department of Biochemistry-University of Nairobi) for their patience, guidance, suggestions, encouragement, support and excellent advice through the course of this study.
  • Forensic Facial Reconstruction SUBJECT FORENSIC SCIENCE

    Forensic Facial Reconstruction SUBJECT FORENSIC SCIENCE

    SUBJECT FORENSIC SCIENCE Paper No. and Title PAPER No. 11: Forensic Anthropology Module No. and Title MODULE No. 21: Forensic Facial Reconstruction Module Tag FSC_P11_M21 FORENSIC SCIENCE PAPER No. 11: Forensic Anthropology MODULE No. 21: Forensic Facial Reconstruction TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Learning Outcomes 2. Introduction 2.1. History 3. Types of Identification 3.1. Circumstantial Identification 3.2. Positive Identification 4. Types of Reconstruction 4.1. Two-Dimensional Reconstruction 4.2. Three- Dimensional Reconstruction 4.3. Superimposition 5. Techniques for creating facial reconstruction 6. Steps of facial reconstruction 7. Limitations of Facial Reconstruction 8. Summary FORENSIC SCIENCE PAPER No. 11: Forensic Anthropology MODULE No. 21: Forensic Facial Reconstruction 1. Learning Outcomes After studying this module, you will be able to know- About facial reconstruction About types of identification and reconstruction About various techniques of facial reconstruction and steps of facial reconstruction. About limitations of facial reconstruction 2. Introduction Amalgamation of artistry with forensic science, osteology, anatomy and anthropology to recreate the face of an individual from its skeletal remains is known as Forensic Facial reconstruction. It is also known as forensic facial approximation. It recreates the individual’s face from features of skull. It is used by anthropologists, forensic investigators and archaeologists to help in portraying historical faces, identification of victims of crime or illustrate the features if fossil human ancestors. Two and three dimensional approaches are available for facial reconstruction. In forensic science, it is one of the most controversial and subjective technique. This method is successfully used inspite of this controversy. There are two types of methods of reconstruction which are used i.e.
  • The Body Farm 1 the Body Farm Rachel Hilton Salt Lake Community College Mortuary Science Department

    The Body Farm 1 the Body Farm Rachel Hilton Salt Lake Community College Mortuary Science Department

    The Body Farm 1 The Body Farm Rachel Hilton Salt Lake Community College Mortuary Science Department The Body Farm 2 The Body Farm The Body Farm, a strange and eerie term you may have heard in a book or on a television show, meaning exactly what it sounds like: an outdoor research facility where bodies are strategically placed in the sun, in the shade, in ponds and in trunks and examined to see the effects of time and certain elements. Why do we have several body farms in the United States and what purpose do they serve? One day the students and staff of body farms across the U.S. hope to aide law enforcement in catching criminals by making an atlas of what happens to the human body after death. By developing this atlas equipped with pictures, copious amounts of time will be saved by law enforcement, time that would otherwise be wasted on trying to develop a time of death. The education a body farm can provide for aspiring forensic anthropology students is endless. Many teachers have tried to simulate crime scenes in classrooms, and while they do work and give students a broader spectrum of inquiries, to have an actual body to study over time is the ultimate gift. Body Farms in the U.S Dr. William M. Bass’ inspiration for starting the body farm stemmed from a possible murder case presented to him by local police where they asked him to approximate time of death of a body whose resting place was disturbed when a couple decided to remodel their home.
  • A Multidisciplinary Validation Study of Nonhuman Animal Models For

    A Multidisciplinary Validation Study of Nonhuman Animal Models For

    The author(s) shown below used Federal funding provided by the U.S. Department of Justice to prepare the following resource: Document Title: A Multidisciplinary Validation Study of Nonhuman Animal Models for Forensic Decomposition Research Author(s): Dawnie Wolfe Steadman, Ph.D., D-ABFA Document Number: 251553 Date Received: March 2018 Award Number: 2013-DN-BX-K037 This resource has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. This resource is being made publically available through the Office of Justice Programs’ National Criminal Justice Reference Service. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Grant # 2013-DN-BX-K037 A Multidisciplinary Validation Study of Nonhuman Animal Models for Forensic Decomposition Research Submitted by: Dawnie Wolfe Steadman, Ph.D., D-ABFA Director of the Forensic Anthropology Center Professor of Anthropology 865-974-0909; [email protected] DUNS: 00-388-7891 EIN: 62-6--1636 The University of Tennessee 1 Circle Park Drive Knoxville, TN 37996-0003 Recipient Account: #R011005404 Final Report This resource was prepared by the author(s) using Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Purpose and Objectives of the Project Over the past century of scientific inquiry into the process of decomposition, nearly every mammal (and other taxa) has been studied.
  • Forensic Anthropology

    Forensic Anthropology

    ADJ14 Advanced Criminal Investigations Forensic Anthropology Forensic Anthropology In any field operation involving human remains, four main tasks may need to be performed: 1. Location a. Finding remains (individual, multiple, visible or buried, informant or search) 2. Mapping a. Placement of remains and associated materials must be mapped in relation to a permanent structure, set as a datum point, and location on a larger map must be pinpointed 3. Excavation a. If remains are interred, must use principles of archaeology to remove. 4. Collection a. Remains must be collected using accepted procedures and must be properly packaged for analysis. Chain of custody is vital. PRELIMINARY ISSUES “A major problem surrounding the recovery of remains is the noninvolvement of forensic anthropologists” (Byers, 2011, p. 75). Investigators often forget to collect/search for all bones – including hand or foot bones. Komar & Potter (2007) demonstrate that the rate of victim identification and determination of cause and manner of death are directly related to the proportion of the body collected on scene. Ensure a proper perimeter is set up as soon as possible. Secure the scene. Watch where you step – bones can be brittle if left in the elements. Watch time – if you are doing an excavation, you are dealing with a death. You can take your time on scene, and these scenes tend to be lengthy – there is no need to rush medical attention. LOCATING REMAINS 1. Determine the location 2. Develop a search plan that is tailored to the unique circumstances of the search area; be aware of what resources you have and what you will need.
  • List of Entries

    List of Entries

    Volume 1.qxd 9/13/2005 3:29 PM Page ix GGGGG LIST OF ENTRIES Aborigines Anthropic principle Apes, greater Aborigines Anthropocentrism Apes, lesser Acheulean culture Anthropology and business Apollonian Acropolis Anthropology and Aquatic ape hypothesis Action anthropology epistemology Aquinas, Thomas Adaptation, biological Anthropology and the Third Arboreal hypothesis Adaptation, cultural World Archaeology Aesthetic appreciation Anthropology of men Archaeology and gender Affirmative action Anthropology of religion studies Africa, socialist schools in Anthropology of women Archaeology, biblical African American thought Anthropology, careers in Archaeology, environmental African Americans Anthropology, characteristics of Archaeology, maritime African thinkers Anthropology, clinical Archaeology, medieval Aggression Anthropology, cultural Archaeology, salvage Ape aggression Anthropology, economic Architectural anthropology Agricultural revolution Anthropology, history of Arctic Agriculture, intensive Future of anthropology Ardrey, Robert Agriculture, origins of Anthropology, humanistic Argentina Agriculture, slash-and-burn Anthropology, philosophical Aristotle Alchemy Anthropology, practicing Arsuaga, J. L. Aleuts Anthropology, social Art, universals in ALFRED: The ALlele FREquency Anthropology and sociology Artificial intelligence Database Social anthropology Artificial intelligence Algonquians Anthropology, subdivisions of Asante Alienation Anthropology, theory in Assimilation Alienation Anthropology, Visual Atapuerca Altamira cave
  • A Look at the History of Forensic Anthropology: Tracing My Academic Genealogy

    A Look at the History of Forensic Anthropology: Tracing My Academic Genealogy

    ISSN 2150-3311 JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ANTHROPOLOGY RESEARCH ARTICLE VOLUME I 2010 ISSUE 1 A Look at the History of Forensic Anthropology: Tracing My Academic Genealogy Stephanie DuPont Golda Ph.D. Candidate Department of Anthropology University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri Copyright © Stephanie DuPont Golda A Look at the History of Forensic Anthropology: Tracing My Academic Genealogy Stephanie DuPont Golda Ph.D. Candidate Department of Anthropology University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri ABSTRACT Construction of an academic genealogy is an important component of professional socialization as well as an opportunity to review the history of subdisciplines within larger disciplines to discover transitions in the pedagogical focus of broad fields in academia. This academic genealogy surveys the development of forensic anthropology rooted in physical anthropology, as early as 1918, until the present, when forensic anthropology was recognized as a legitimate subfield in anthropology. A historical review of contributions made by members of this genealogy demonstrates how forensic anthropology progressed from a period of classification and description to complete professionalization as a highly specialized and applied area of anthropology. Additionally, the tracing of two academic genealogies, the first as a result of a master’s degree and the second as a result of a doctoral degree, allows for representation of the two possible intellectual lineages in forensic anthropology. Golda: A Look at the History of Forensic Anthropology 35 INTRODUCTION What better way to learn the history of anthropology as a graduate student than to trace your own academic genealogy? Besides, without explicit construction of my own unique, individual, ego-centered genealogy, according to Darnell (2001), it would be impossible for me to read the history of anthropology as part of my professional socialization.
  • Identifying Individuals Through Proteomic Analysis: a New

    Identifying Individuals Through Proteomic Analysis: a New

    The author(s) shown below used Federal funding provided by the U.S. Department of Justice to prepare the following resource: Document Title: Identifying Individuals through Proteomic Analysis: A New Forensic Tool to Rapidly and Efficiently Identify Large Numbers of Fragmentary Human Remains Author(s): City of New York, Office of Chief Medical Examiner Document Number: 254583 Date Received: March 2020 Award Number: 2014-DN-BX-K014 This resource has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. This resource is being made publically available through the Office of Justice Programs’ National Criminal Justice Reference Service. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Final Summary NIJ Grant 2014-DN-BX-K014 Identifying Individuals through Proteomic Analysis: A New Forensic Tool to Rapidly and Efficiently Identify Large Numbers of Fragmentary Human Remains Final Summary: NIJ Grant 2014-DN-BX-K014, Identifying Individuals through Proteomic Analysis: A New Forensic Tool to Rapidly and Efficiently Identify Large Numbers of Fragmentary Human Remains. This summary follows the NIJ Post Award Reporting Requirements issued March 28, 2019 and is divided into the four prescribed sections: 1) Purpose, 2) Research Design & Methods, 3) Data Analysis & Findings, and 4) Implications for Criminal Justice Policy and Practice. ABBREVIATIONS ACN = Acetonitrile mse = mean square error ADD = accumulated degree days MS/MS = tandem mass
  • Forensic Entomology: the Use of Insects in the Investigation of Homicide and Untimely Death Q

    Forensic Entomology: the Use of Insects in the Investigation of Homicide and Untimely Death Q

    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. Winter 1989 41 Forensic Entomology: The Use of Insects in the Investigation of Homicide and Untimely Death by Wayne D. Lord, Ph.D. and William C. Rodriguez, Ill, Ph.D. reportedly been living in and frequenting the area for several Editor’s Note weeks. The young lady had been reported missing by her brother approximately four days prior to discovery of her Special Agent Lord is body. currently assigned to the An investigation conducted by federal, state and local Hartford, Connecticut Resident authorities revealed that she had last been seen alive on the Agency ofthe FBi’s New Haven morning of May 31, 1984, in the company of a 30-year-old Division. A graduate of the army sergeant, who became the primary suspect. While Univercities of Delaware and considerable circumstantial evidence supported the evidence New Hampshin?, Mr Lordhas that the victim had been murdered by the sergeant, an degrees in biology, earned accurate estimation of the victim’s time of death was crucial entomology and zoology. He to establishing a link between the suspect and the victim formerly served in the United at the time of her demise. States Air Force at the Walter Several estimates of postmortem interval were offered by Army Medical Center in Reed medical examiners and investigators. These estimates, Washington, D.C., and tire F however, were based largely on the physical appearance of Edward Hebert School of the body and the extent to which decompositional changes Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland. had occurred in various organs, and were not based on any Rodriguez currently Dr.
  • Experimental Investigations of Blunt Force Trauma in the Human Skeleton

    Experimental Investigations of Blunt Force Trauma in the Human Skeleton

    EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF BLUNT FORCE TRAUMA IN THE HUMAN SKELETON By Mariyam I. Isa A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Anthropology—Doctor of Philosophy 2020 ABSTRACT EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF BLUNT FORCE TRAUMA IN THE HUMAN SKELETON By Mariyam I. Isa In forensic anthropology, skeletal trauma is a growing area of analysis that can contribute important evidence about the circumstances of an individual’s death. In bioarchaeology, patterns of skeletal trauma are situated within a cultural context to explore human behaviors across time and space. Trauma analysis involves transforming observations of fracture patterns in the human skeleton into inferences about the circumstances involved in their production. This analysis is based on the foundational assumption that fracture behavior is the nonrandom result of interactions between extrinsic factors influencing the stresses placed on bone and intrinsic factors affecting bone’s ability to withstand these stresses. Biomechanical principles provide the theoretical foundation for generating hypotheses about how various extrinsic and intrinsic factors affect the formation of fracture patterns, and about how these factors can be read from fracture patterns. However, research is necessary to test and refine these hypotheses and, on a more basic level, to document the relationships between “input” variables of interest and fracture “outputs.” One research approach involves the use of forensic and/or clinical case samples. Case- based approaches are important because they provide data from real scenarios and contexts that may be similar to those encountered in unknown cases. However, a limitation is that input variables are not directly measured or controlled and therefore cannot be precisely known.
  • Solving Crimes by Using Forensic Entomology Dr

    Solving Crimes by Using Forensic Entomology Dr

    Solving Crimes by Using Forensic Entomology Dr. Deborah Waller Associate Professor of Biology Old Dominion University The Scenario The following is a hypothetical crime that was solved using insect evidence. Although fictional, this crime represents a compilation of numerous similar forensic entomology cases tried in the legal system where insects helped identify the murderer. The Crime Scene Pamela Martin, a 55 year-old woman, was found deceased in a state of advanced decomposition on March 30th. The body was discovered by her husband John on a path leading to a mountain cabin owned by the couple. The Martins had driven up to the cabin on March 1st, and John had left Pamela there alone while he completed a job in the northeastern region of the state. The Victim Pamela Martin was a former school librarian who devoted her retirement years to reading and gardening. She took medication for a heart condition and arthritis and generally led a quiet life. Pamela was married for 30 years to John Martin, a truck driver who was often gone for months at a time on his rounds. They had no children. The Cabin The cabin was isolated with closest neighbors several kilometers away. There was no internet access and cell phone service was out of range. The couple frequently drove up there to do repairs, and John often left Pamela alone while he made his rounds throughout the state. "Cabin and Woods" by DCZwick is licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0 The Police The police and coroner arrived on the scene March 30th after John called them using his Citizen Band radio when he discovered Pamela’s body.