DOCSLIB.ORG

Analyst and Investor Event New York May 30, 2019 Disclaimer 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analyst and Investor Event New York May 30, 2019 Disclaimer 2 Analyst and Investor Event New York May 30, 2019 Disclaimer 2 This presentation contains certain statements that are deemed to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable U.S. federal securities laws. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, (including, without limitation, statements that address activities, events or developments that Ardmore Shipping Corporation (“Ardmore,” “ASC,” or the “Company”) “estimates”, “expects,” “projects,” “believes,” or “anticipates” will, or may occur in the future) are forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements about: future operating or financial results; global and regional economic conditions and trends; tanker market fundamentals, including the balance of supply and demand in the tanker market, the estimated growth in the world tanker fleet, the amount of tanker deliveries and scrapping, estimated growth in global oil and refined products demand and supply, tanker demand and future charter rates; improvements in the tanker market; the effect of the IMO 2020 regulations on tanker demand and rates, and refining throughput and maintenance levels; the location and timing of refining capacity growth; the Company’s business strategy, market outlook and fleet performance; future vessel acquisitions; the potential effect on the Company’s earnings per share of tanker rate increases; estimated revenue days and the timing of drydockings and ballast water treatment system installations; and the Company’s financial condition and liquidity. The following factors are among those that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties, and that should be considered in evaluating any such statement: changes in the production of, or demand for, oil or refined products; changes in trading patterns significantly affecting overall vessel tonnage requirements; greater, or less than anticipated levels of tanker newbuilding orders and deliveries and greater, or less than anticipated rates of tanker scrapping; changes in global oil prices; changes in applicable industry laws and regulations and the timing of implementation of new laws and regulations, and the actual effect of the IMO 2020 regulations; the actual timing and location of any changes in refining capacity; changes in factors that would affect the Company’s earnings per share, including, among other things, the number of the Company’s outstanding common shares and fleet size; the availability on acceptable terms of second-hand vessels; increased costs; increased vessel off-hire; the amount of future cash flows and earnings of the Company; and other factors discussed in the Company’s filings from time to time with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including its Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. The Company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in the Company’s expectations with respect thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. For more complete information about the Company, the information in this presentation should be read together with the Company’s filings with the SEC which may be accessed on the SEC website at www.sec.gov . 2 Welcome 3 3 Panel and Presenters 4 Name Experience . CEO of Industrial Shipping Enterprises, COO of MTM Group and CFO of Teekay Shipping Anthony Gurnee Corp. CEO . Shipping financier with Citicorp and U.S. Naval Officer Ardmore Shipping . MBA, CFA, Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers . Trader with Vitol S.A. (Crude and Refined Products), General Manager at Basis Petroleum Andy Lipow Inc., Refinery Engineer with Amoco Oil Company President . Contributor to various media outlets including CNBC, Bloomberg TV and Fox Lipow Oil Associates . BSc in Chemistry and MSc in Chemical Engineering . Formerly at Ernst & Young, Financial Services Advisory Paul Tivnan . BA, MBS, Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants and Irish Taxation Institute CFO . Member of the Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers Ardmore Shipping . Graduate of INSEAD and London Business School; Executive Leadership Programmes . Tanker Broker at Poten & Partners Gernot Ruppelt . Trade Manager Maersk Broker / AP Møller-Maersk (Copenhagen, Singapore, Germany) CCO . Graduate of Hamburg Shipping School and Member of the Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers Ardmore Shipping . Chairman of INTERTANKO’s Commercial & Markets Committee 4 Introduction and Agenda 5 I. Welcome and Presenter Introduction Anthony Gurnee II. Ardmore Shipping Anthony Gurnee and Paul Tivnan o Company Overview o Finance and Operations o Recent Market Activity and Performance o Product Tanker Fundamentals III. Market Outlook and IMO 2020 Anthony Gurnee and Andy Lipow o Introduction to IMO 2020 and Impact on Product Tanker Demand o IMO 2020: Refining Process, Compliant Fuel Production and Logistics IV. Question and Answers Panel Discussion V. Closing Remarks Anthony Gurnee 5 Agenda 6 I. Welcome and Presenter Introduction II. Ardmore Shipping III. Market Outlook and IMO 2020 IV. Questions and Answers V. Closing Remarks 6 Company Overview 7 7 Our Company 8 High Quality Fleet: 25 x “Eco” Product Tankers Financial Discipline Fully Integrated and Focus Shipping on ROIC Company Highly Shareholder Attractive Friendly Market Outlook Corporate Governance Low Cost Platform & Focus on Performance 8 Our Business 9 9 High Quality Fleet of “Eco” MRs 10 High Quality Vessels Vessel Name Type Dwt Tonnes IMO Built Country Flag Specification Ardmore Seavaliant Product/Chemical 49,998 2/3 Feb-13 Korea MI Eco-design Modern, highly fuel efficient Ardmore Seaventure Product/Chemical 49,998 2/3 Jun-13 Korea MI Eco-design fleet of MRs Ardmore Seavantage Product/Chemical 49,997 2/3 Jan-14 Korea MI Eco-design Ardmore Seavanguard Product/Chemical 49,998 2/3 Feb-14 Korea MI Eco-design Average age of 5.9 years(1) Ardmore Sealion Product/Chemical 49,999 2/3 May-15 Korea MI Eco-design Ardmore Seafox Product/Chemical 49,999 2/3 Jun-15 Korea MI Eco-design Ardmore Seawolf Product/Chemical 49,999 2/3 Aug-15 Korea MI Eco-design Built at high-quality yards in Ardmore Seahawk Product/Chemical 49,999 2/3 Nov-15 Korea MI Eco-design Korea and Japan Ardmore Endeavour Product/Chemical 49,997 2/3 Jul-13 Korea MI Eco-design Ardmore Enterprise Product/Chemical 49,453 2/3 Sep-13 Korea MI Eco-design Quality fleet = lower operating Ardmore Endurance Product/Chemical 49,466 2/3 Dec-13 Korea MI Eco-design costs, higher utilization and Ardmore Explorer Product/Chemical 49,494 2/3 Jan-14 Korea MI Eco-design maximum value appreciation Ardmore Encounter Product/Chemical 49,478 2/3 Jan-14 Korea MI Eco-design Ardmore Exporter Product/Chemical 49,466 2/3 Feb-14 Korea MI Eco-design Complementary fleet Ardmore Engineer Product/Chemical 49,420 2/3 Mar-14 Korea MI Eco-design Ardmore Seamariner Product/Chemical 45,726 3 Oct-06 Japan MI Eco-mod Ardmore Sealancer Product 47,451 — Jun-08 Japan MI Eco-mod Ardmore Sealeader Product 47,463 — Aug-08 Japan MI Eco-mod Ardmore Sealifter Product 47,472 — Jul-08 Japan MI Eco-mod Ardmore Dauntless Product/Chemical 37,764 2 Feb-15 Korea MI Eco-design Ardmore Defender Product/Chemical 37,791 2 Feb-15 Korea MI Eco-design Ardmore Cherokee Product/Chemical 25,215 2 Jan-15 Japan MI Eco-design Ardmore Cheyenne Product/Chemical 25,217 2 Mar-15 Japan MI Eco-design Ardmore Chinook Product/Chemical 25,217 2 Jul-15 Japan MI Eco-design Ardmore Chippewa Product/Chemical 25,217 2 Nov-15 Japan MI Eco-design Total 25 1,111,294 5.9 1. Average age as at May 30, 2019 10 MRs are the “Yellow Cabs” of the World Tanker Fleet(1) 11 MR VLCC LR1 LR2 MRs Trade Everywhere And Are The Ship Of Choice For Oil Traders Due To Their Versatility 1. Vessels Value AIS Data, November 9, 2018 11 Industry Leading Corporate Governance 12 Commentary Shipping Corporate Governance Ranking(1) 1 Eagle Bulk Shipping EGLE 2 International Seaways INSW 3 Overseas Shipholding Group OSG . Corporate governance and transparency remain key to the 4 Triton TRTN 5 Ardmore Shipping Corporation ASC company and our investors 6 Matson MATX 7 Euronav EURN Quartile 1 8 Kirby Corporation KEX 9 Genco Shipping and Trading GNK (1) 10 Navigator Gas NVGS . ASC ranked in the top tier of public shipping companies 11 World Fuel Services INT 12 Gaslog GLOG 13 Double Hull Tankers DHT 14 CAI International CAI (2) 15 Textainer Group Holdings TGH . Fully independent Board of Directors ; decades of 16 Seacor Holdings CKH 17 Teekay Tankers TNK experience in shipping and finance 18 Grindrod GRIN 19 Golar GLNG 20 Golden Ocean Group GOGL 21 Teekay TK Quartile 2 . 22 Flex LNG FLEX No related party and affiliated transactions 23 Frontline FRO 24 New Fortress Energy NFE 25 Ship Finance International SFL 26 Gaslog Partners LP GLOP 27 Hunter Group ASA OB:HUNT 28 Dorian LPG 29 Teekay Offshore TOO 30 Hoegh LNG Partners HMLP 31 Torm TRMD 32 Avance Gas AVANCE 33 Seaspan SSW 34 BW LPG BWLPG 35 Nordic American Tankers NAT Quartile 3 36 Golar LNG Partners GMLP 37 Teekay LNG Partners TGP 38 Diamond S DSSI 39 Navios Maritime Holdings NM 40 Seadrill Partners SDLP 41 Star Bulk SBLK 42 Costamare CMRE 43 Navios Maritime Partners NMM 44 Navios Maritime Acquisition Corp. NNA 45 Scorpio Bulkers SALT 46 Global Ship Lease GSL 47 Knot Offshore Partners LP KNOP 48 Capital Product Partners CPLP 49 Scorpio Tankers STNG Quartile 4 50 Dynagas DLNG 51 Diana Shipping Inc. DSX 52 Tsakos Energy Navigation TNP 53 Stealth Gas Inc. GASS 54 Safe Bulkers SB 55 Danaos Corporation DAC 56 Dry Ships DRYS 1. Wells Fargo Corporate Governance Scorecard Volume VI issued May 6, 2019 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Filing Port Code Filing Port Name Manifest Number Filing Date Last
    Filing Last Port Call Sign Foreign Trade Official Voyage Vessel Type Dock Code Filing Port Name Manifest Number Filing Date Last Domestic Port Vessel Name Last Foreign Port Number IMO Number Country Code Number Number Vessel Flag Code Agent Name PAX Total Crew Operator Name Draft Tonnage Owner Name Dock Name InTrans 5301 HOUSTON, TX 5301-2021-01647 1/1/2021 - GOLDENGATE PARK RIO JAINA D5EL2 9493145 DO 1 16098 64 LR 150 NORTON LILLY INTL 0 23 MADDSIN SHIPPING LTD. 18'0" 6115 MADDSIN SHIPPING LTD. ITC DEER PARK DOCK NO 7 L 2002 NEW ORLEANS, LA 2002-2021-00907 1/1/2021 HOUSTON, TX AS Cleopatra - V2DV3 9311787 - 6 4550 051N AG 310 NORTON LILLY INTERNATIONAL 3 17 AS CLEOPATRA SCHIFFAHRTSGESELLSCHAFT MBH & CO., KG 37'9" 13574 AS CLEOPATRA SCHIFFAHRTSGESELLSCHAFT MBH & CO., KG NASHVILLE AVENUE WHARVES A, B AND C DFLX 4106 ERIE, PA 4106-2021-00002 1/1/2021 - ALGOMA BUFFALO HAMILTON, ONT WXS6134 7620653 CA 1 841536 058 CA 600 WORLD SHIPPING INC. 0 20 ALGOMA CENTRAL CORPORATION CANADA 22'6" 5107 ALGOMA CENTRAL CORPORATION CANADA DONJON SHIPBUILDING & REPAIR N 2002 NEW ORLEANS, LA 2002-2021-00906 1/1/2021 HOUSTON, TX TEMPANOS - A8VP9 9447897 - 6 92780 2044N LR 310 NORTON LILLY INTERNATIONAL 2 26 HAPAG-LLOYD/ GERMANY 39'4" 42897 HULL 1794 CO. LTD NASHVILLE AVENUE WHARVES A, B AND C DFLX 1103 WILMINGTON, DE 1103-2021-00185 1/1/2021 PORTSMOUTH, NH HOURAI MARU - V7A2157 9796585 - 4 8262 1 MH 210 MORAN SHIPPING AGENCIES, INC 0 24 SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED 23'4" 7638 SOUTHERN PACIFIC HOLDING CORPORATION SUNOCO MARCUS HOOK L 2904 PORTLAND, OR 2904-2021-00150 1/1/2021 - PAN TOPAZ KUSHIRO 3FMZ5 9625827 JP 1 43732-12-B 52 PA 229 transmarine navigation corp.
    [Show full text]
  • SHORT SEA SHIPPING INITIATIVES and the IMPACTS on October 2007 the TEXAS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: TECHNICAL Published: December 2007 REPORT 6
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-08/0-5695-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date SHORT SEA SHIPPING INITIATIVES AND THE IMPACTS ON October 2007 THE TEXAS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: TECHNICAL Published: December 2007 REPORT 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. C. James Kruse, Juan Carlos Villa, David H. Bierling, Manuel Solari Report 0-5695-1 Terra, Nathan Hutson 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project 0-5695 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report: Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2006-August 2007 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Short Sea Shipping Initiatives and the Impacts on the Texas Transportation System URL: http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-5695-1.pdf 16. Abstract This report examines the potential effects of short sea shipping (SSS) development on the Texas transportation system. The project region includes Texas, Mexico, and Central America. In the international arena, the most likely prospects are for containerized shipments using small container ships. In the domestic arena, the most likely prospects are for coastwise shipments using modified offshore service vessels or articulated tug/barges. Only three Texas ports handle containers consistently (Houston accounts for 95% of the total), and three more handle containers sporadically.
    [Show full text]
  • (AGCS) Safety & Shipping Review 2021
    ALLIANZ GLOBAL CORPORATE & SPECIALTY Safety and Shipping Review 2021 An annual review of trends and developments in shipping losses and safety SAFETY AND SHIPPING REVIEW 2021 About AGCS Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty (AGCS) is a leading global corporate insurance carrier and a key business unit of Allianz Group. We provide risk consultancy, Property‑Casualty insurance solutions and alternative risk transfer for a wide spectrum of commercial, corporate and specialty risks across 10 dedicated lines of business. Our customers are as diverse as business can be, ranging from Fortune Global 500 companies to small businesses, and private individuals. Among them are not only the world’s largest consumer brands, tech companies and the global aviation and shipping industry, but also satellite operators or Hollywood film productions. They all look to AGCS for smart answers to their largest and most complex risks in a dynamic, multinational business environment and trust us to deliver an outstanding claims experience. Worldwide, AGCS operates with its own teams in 31 countries and through the Allianz Group network and partners in over 200 countries and territories, employing around 4,400 people. As one of the largest Property‑ Casualty units of Allianz Group, we are backed by strong and stable financial ratings. In 2020, AGCS generated a total of €9.3 billion gross premium globally. www.agcs.allianz.com 2 PAGE 4 Executive summary PAGE 10 Losses in focus: 2011 to 2020 Trends PAGE 18 1. The Covid factors PAGE 28 2. Larger vessels PAGE 38 3. Supply chains and ports PAGE 42 4. Security and sanctions PAGE 48 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Turbidity and Suspended Sediment Concentrations Using an Unmanned Surface Vehicle
    UNCLASSIFIED Estimating turbidity and suspended sediment concentrations using an unmanned surface vehicle Justin Wilkens*, Andrew McQueen, and Burton Suedel Research Biologist Environmental Laboratory U.S. Army Engineering Research and Development Center WEDA DREDGING SUMMIT & EXPO June 4-7, 2019 UNCLASSIFIED DISCOVER | DEVELOP | DELIVER File Name UNCLASSIFIED Why use an unmanned surface vehicle (USV)? Potential for USVs to perform routine monitoring and survey missions autonomously Potential to reduce equipment procurement and operating costs while maintaining capability levels and in some cases increasing them The purchase and deployment of USVs within the USACE is growing. US Army Corps of Engineers • Engineer Research and Development Center UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Introduction Inland and intracoastal waterways, and coastal channels occur in relatively shallow waters. US Army Corps of Engineers • Engineer Research and Development Center UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Introduction Monitoring US Army Corps of Engineers • Engineer Research and Development Center UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Study Goal What are the characteristics of using a USV to measure water quality in shallow water? 1) Measure influence of vessel wake on re-suspension of sediments 2) Measure relationship between vessel type and sediment disturbances 3) Application for dredge plume monitoring US Army Corps of Engineers • Engineer Research and Development Center UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Study Area US Army Corps of Engineers • Engineer Research and Development Center UNCLASSIFIED
    [Show full text]
  • Risk and Cost Assessment of Emergency Towing and Salvage
    DET NORSKE VERITAS Report No: MS/314/2004/145, rev. 1 REPORT Table of Contents Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................. 1 2 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................. 2 3 OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF WORK ............................................................................................. 3 4 APPROACH........................................................................................................................................ 4 4.1 General ................................................................................................................................ 4 4.1.1 Review of DNV 2000 risk model................................................................................ 4 4.1.2 Baseline for Risk Evaluations ..................................................................................... 4 4.1.3 Study Areas................................................................................................................. 4 4.2 TASK 1: Incident Trends from Historical Data.................................................................. 6 4.2.1 Data Gathering............................................................................................................6 4.2.2 Incident Patterns and Importance of Towing and Salvage Vessels ............................ 6 4.3 TASK 2: Mapping of Emergency Resources.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Clarkson Full Year Results 2020
    8 March 2021 Clarkson PLC (Clarksons) is the world’s leading provider of integrated shipping services. From offices in 23 countries on six continents, we play a vital intermediary role in the movement of the majority of commodities around the world. Preliminary results Clarkson PLC today announces preliminary results for the 12 months ended 31 December 2020. Summary • Robust underlying financial performance, ahead of market expectations • Strong performance in Broking more than offset weakness in Financial services • Continued strong free cash flow generation • 18th consecutive year of dividend growth • One-off, non-cash impairment charge of £60.6m in relation to securities and offshore • Forward order book going into 2021 is larger than at the same time last year • Robust balance sheet with free cash resources1 of £81.1m (31 December 2019: £68.7m) • Rapid transition to remote working expedited rollout of our Sea/ products to clients • Medium-term macro environment for shipping favourable as demand / supply dynamics set to improve post pandemic • Well positioned to support the green transition in shipping and benefit from the expected economic and global trade recovery ¹ Free cash resources are cash and cash equivalents and current investment deposits, after deducting amounts accrued for performance- related bonuses, outstanding loans and monies held by regulated entities. Year ended Year ended 31 December 2020 31 December 2019 Revenue £358.2m £363.0m Underlying profit before taxation* £44.7m £49.3m Reported (loss)/profit before taxation (£16.4m) £0.2m Underlying earnings per share* 106.0p 118.8p Reported loss per share (95.2p) (42.4p) Dividend per share 79p 78p** * Before exceptional item of £60.6m and acquisition related costs of £0.5m (2019: exceptional item of £47.5m and acquisition related costs of £1.6m).
    [Show full text]
  • OCIMF Report Template VIQ7 - Chemical
    OCIMF Report Template VIQ7 - Chemical 4402 7.0.07 4402 7.0.07 VIQ7 - Chemical General Information General Information 1.1 Name of the vessel: Note: Prefixes (MT, MV, SS etc.) must not be used unless they are actually a part of the registered name of the vessel. The name must be entered exactly as it appears on the Certificate of Registry. 1.2 Vessel IMO Number: 1.3 Date the inspection was completed: If the inspection took place over two or more days, in two or more sessions, or was carried out by more than one inspector, record the arrival and departure details in comments. 1.4 Was a full inspection of the vessel completed If a full inspection of the vessel was not completed, please note the reasons why, and also the areas of the ship that were not inspected 1.5 Port of inspection: 1.6 Flag: If a change of flag has taken place within the past 6 months, record the date of change and the previous flag in Comments. 1.7 Deadweight: (metric tonnes) Note: For vessels with multiple load line certificates, record the maximum of the assigned deadweight’s. 1.8 Date the vessel was delivered: Any periods of lay up since delivery should be recorded in Comments. The date of delivery from the original builder as listed in the IOPPC must be recorded. If the date of delivery is not recorded in the IOPPC Form A or Form B, the date of delivery as contained in Safety Construction Certificate must be recorded. If the vessel has been 're-aged', the original build date must be recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipping Under the Jones Act: Legislative and Regulatory Background
    Shipping Under the Jones Act: Legislative and Regulatory Background Updated November 21, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45725 SUMMARY R45725 Shipping Under the Jones Act: November 21, 2019 Legislative and Regulatory Background John Frittelli The Jones Act, which refers to Section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (P.L. 66-261), Specialist in requires that vessels transporting cargo from one U.S. point to another U.S. point be U.S.-built, Transportation Policy and owned and crewed by U.S. citizens. The act provides a significant degree of protection for U.S. shipyards, domestic carriers, and American merchant sailors. It is a subject of debate because some experts argue that it leads to high domestic ocean shipping costs and constrains the availability of ships for domestic use. The Jones Act has come into prominence amid debates over Puerto Rico’s economic challenges and recovery from Hurricane Maria in 2017; in the investigation into the sinking of the ship El Faro with 33 fatalities during a hurricane in 2015; and in discussions about domestic transportation of oil and natural gas. The law’s effectiveness in achieving national security goals has also been the subject of attention in conjunction with a congressional directive that the Administration develop a national maritime strategy, including strategies to increase the use of short sea shipping and enhance U.S. shipbuilding capability. Defense officials have stated that while the Jones Act helps preserve a baseline of shipyard capability, the dwindling size of the fleet indicates a need to reassess current policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The LNG Fuel Solution in Shipping Dr Gerd Würsig (Segment Director)
    The LNG fuel solution in shipping Dr Gerd Würsig (Segment Director), 1 DNV GL © SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER Gas for propulsion- before year 2000 . CNG as fuel in ships in Russia, Netherlands, US, Canada, Australia . Gas engine installations offshore (FPSOs) . LNG carriers (dual fuel boiler / steam turbine propulsion) . Today about 400 LNG Carriers DNV GL © 2 The development trend is moving from LOCAL … 2000 – 2013 Norway 3 DNV GL © … to GLOBAL … 4 DNV GL © 59 LNG fuelled ships in operation worldwide (1/2) Ships in operation Year Type of vessel Owner Class Year Type of vessel Owner Class 2000 Car/passenger ferry Fjord1 DNV 2012 PSV Eidesvik DNV 2003 PSV Simon Møkster DNV 2012 PSV Olympic Shipping DNV 2003 PSV Eidesvik DNV 2012 PSV Island Offshore DNV 2006 Car/passenger ferry Fjord1 DNV 2012 General Cargo Nordnorsk Shipping DNV 2007 Car/passenger ferry Fjord1 DNV 2012 PSV Eidesvik Shipping DNV 2007 Car/passenger ferry Fjord1 DNV 2012 PSV Island Offshore DNV 2007 Car/passenger ferry Fjord1 DNV 2012 Car/passenger ferry Torghatten Nord DNV 2007 Car/passenger ferry Fjord1 DNV 2012 Car/passenger ferry Torghatten Nord DNV 2008 PSV Eidesvik Shipping DNV 2012 Car/passenger ferry Torghatten Nord DNV 2009 PSV Eidesvik Shipping DNV 2013 PSV REM DNV 2009 Car/passenger ferry Tide Sjø DNV 2013 RoPax Viking Line LR 2009 Car/passenger ferry Tide Sjø DNV 2013 Car/passenger ferry Torghatten Nord DNV 2009 Car/passenger ferry Tide Sjø DNV 2013 Tug Incheon Port Authority KR 2009 Patrol vessel Remøy Management DNV 2013 General Cargo Eidsvaag DNV 2009 Car/passenger
    [Show full text]
  • Tanker Technology: Limitations of Double Hulls
    (A37851) TANKER US Coast Guard TECHNOLOGY : LIMITATIONS OF DOUBLE HULLS photo A Report by Living Oceans Society www.livingoceans.org photo: Natalia Bratslavsky limitations (A37851) o f d o u b l e - h u l l ta n k e r s Acknowledgements This report was made possible through the generous support of the Tar Sands Campaign Fund of Tides Foundation. Living Oceans Society would also like to thank Dave Shannon for his many valuable 2 contributions and insights into the writing of this report. Living Oceans Society Box 320 Sointula, BC V0N 3E0 Canada 250 973 6580 [email protected] www.livingoceans.org © 2011 Living Oceans Society Terhune, K. (2011). Tanker Technology: limitations of double hulls. A Report by Living Oceans Society. Sointula, BC: Living Oceans Society. (A37851) Contents Executive Summary . 4 Sole owner responsibility . 12 Introduction . 5 Corrosion . 12 Background . 6 Protective coatings . 14 Double hull design . 6 Fatigue cracks . 14 Regulation . 7 Inspection . 15 Oil Pollution Act of 1990 . 7 Human Factors . 16 International Convention for the Double-Hull Tanker Spills . 17 Prevention of Pollution from Ships . 7 Bunga Kelana 3 . 17 Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations . 7 Eagle Otome . 17 Limitations of Double Hulls . 8 Krymsk . 17 Design and construction issues . 8 Conclusion . 18 Lack of experience . 8 Glossary . 19 Factory techniques . 8 Bibliography . 21 Limited warranty . 8 Appendix A . 23 Weakened class rules . 9 Double-Hull, Double-Bottom and Use of high tensile steel . 10 Double-Sided Spills . 23 Operational issues . 10 Higher stress levels . 10 Cargo leaks . 10 Gas detection . 11 Intact stability . 12 Mud build-up .
    [Show full text]
  • (Emergency Towing Arrangements) (Tankers) Regulations 1997
    Statutory Document no. 132/97 MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT 1985 MERCHANT SHIPPING (EMERGENCY TOWING ARRANGEMENTS) (TANKERS) REGULATIONS 1997 Coming into operation : 1st April, 1997 In exercise of the powers conferred on the Department of Transport by sections 1 and 2 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1985 (a), and of all other enabling powers, after consultation with the Secretary of State and those persons referred to in section 2(2) of the Merchant Shipping Act 1985, the following Regulations are hereby made:- Citation and commencement 1. These Regulations may be cited as the Merchant Shipping (Emergency Towing Arrangements) (Tankers) Regulations 1997 and shall come into operation on 1st April, 1997. Interpretation 2. In these Regulations - "chemical tanker" means a ship constructed or adapted primarily to carry a cargo of noxious liquid substances in bulk and includes an oil tanker when carrying a cargo or part cargo of noxious liquid substances in bulk; "combination carrier" means a ship designed to carry either oil or solid cargoes in bulk; "Department" means the Department of Transport; "gas carrier" means a self-propelled cargo ship constructed or adapted and used for the carriage in bulk of any liquefied gas or any other substance listed in Chapter 19 of the IGC Code; "1986-1994 gas carrier" means - (a) a gas carrier which was constructed on or after 1st July 1986 but before 1st October 1994; (b) a ship which was converted to being a gas carrier in that period; or (c) (to the extent that the Department considers reasonable and practicable) a gas carrier which was constructed before 1st July 1986, but which underwent repairs, alterations or modifications of a major character in that period; (a) 1985 c.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Printed in Japan in Printed
    KAWASAKI KISEN KAISHA, LTD. Annual Report 2013 for the year ended March 31, 2013 Iino Building, 1-1, Uchisaiwaicho 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8540, Japan Phone : (+81) 3-3595-5063 (IR & PR Group) Fax : (+81) 3-3595-5001 http://www.kline.co.jp/en/ E-book Information 2013 REPORT ANNUAL Annual Report 2013 is also available in e-book format. ▲ ▲ http://www.kline.co.jp/en/ir/library/annual/index.html Choosing Our Opportunities Wisely Printed in Japan Profi le Outline of the Company/Stock Information “K” Line is an integrated world-class shipping company that owns and operates a diverse fl eet of ships adapted to the world’s marine transport Outline of the Company (As of March 31, 2013) Stock Information (As of March 31, 2013) needs. As of March 31, 2013, the “K” Line Group included 29 domestic Name Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. (“K” Line) Authorized 2,000,000,000 shares of common stock and 286 overseas consolidated subsidiaries. Approximately 7,700 Established April 5, 1919 Issued 939,382,298 shares of common stock Paid-in Capital ¥75,457.64 million Number of Shareholders 57,966 employees work at sea and on land representing the “K” Line brand President Jiro Asakura Shareholder Registry Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank, Limited with the aim of growing “K” Line as a trusted global carrier. Employees On-land Duty 481 Administrator 1-4-1, Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo At-sea Duty 178 Listing of Shares Tokyo, Nagoya and Fukuoka The starting point of the “K” Line Group’s business activities is Total 659 Business Lines Marine transportation, Land transportation, the conviction that we create added value and contribute to more Air transportation, Through transportation involving marine, fulfi lling lives for people everywhere by transporting cargo of every land and air transportation, Harbor transportation, etc.
    [Show full text]