SDO 2005 Macfarlane Datasets

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SDO 2005 Macfarlane Datasets Identification and evaluation of standardised datasets for measuring and monitoring access to health care Identification and evaluation of standardised datasets for measuring and monitoring access to health care Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO) August 2004, revised November 2005 Prepared by Alison Macfarlane Nicholas Drey Sylvia Godden Allyson Pollock Anita Sims Address for Correspondence Alison Macfarlane Professor of Perinatal Health Department of Midwifery St Bartholomew School of Nursing & Midwifery Institute of Health Sciences, City University 24 Chiswell St London EC1Y 4TY Email: [email protected] Telephone 020 7040 5832 © NCCSDO 2006 1 Identification and evaluation of standardised datasets for measuring and monitoring access to health care Contents Tables 6 Executive Summary Introduction 10 Aims and objectives 10 Methods 11 Results 12 Conclusions 14 Recommendations 14 The Report Section1 Introduction 16 1.1 Background 16 1.2 Aims and objectives 17 1.3 Scope 17 1.4 What are standardised datasets? 17 1.4.1 Routinely collected data 17 1.4.2 Standardised datasets 17 1.4.3 Central returns 18 1.4.4 Official statistics 18 Section 2 Methods ....................................................................19 2.1 Identification of routine datasets......................................... 19 2.1.1 Literature review ......................................................20 2.1.2 Survey of data collection requirements by personal letter..........................................................21 2.1.3 Contact with a range of data users and providers through consultation....................................21 2.2 Defining access to health care and developing a framework for access............................................................22 2.2.1 Definitions of access .................................................22 2.2.2 An operational definition of access ..............................25 2.2.3 Application of the framework to a range of data sources relevant to access to health care ..............27 2.2.4 Application of the framework to selected case studies .............................................................27 2.3 Monitoring changes during the project ................................. 27 Section 3 Health service data 29 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 Hospital Episode Statistics and episode based inpatient data 29 3.2.1 Hospital Inpatient Enquiry (HIPE) and Hospital Activity Analysis (HAA) 30 3.2.2 Episode-based data: HES and the Admitted Patient Care Commissioning Dataset 33 3.2.3 Strengths and limitations of HES and hospital activity data collections for monitoring © NCCSDO 2006 2 Identification and evaluation of standardised datasets for measuring and monitoring access to health care access to health care 43 3.3 Aggregated health service activity data 46 3.3.1. Aggregated hospital data 46 3.3.2 Aggregated primary care data 49 3.3.3 NHS and local authority community datasets 56 3.3.4 Waiting times data 59 3.3.5 Staffing and workforce data 62 3.4 Communicable disease reporting 65 3.4.1 Data currently collected 66 3.4.2 Recent developments 71 3.4.3 Strengths and limitations of communicable disease data to measure access to health care 72 3.5 Access to health care and health service data 73 3.6 Discussion 78 Section 4 Population-based data 80 4.1 Introduction 80 4.2 Population-based censuses and continuous surveys 80 4.2.1 The Census of Population 82 4.2.2 The Health Survey for England 85 4.2.3 The General Household Survey 88 4.2.4 Other population surveys 90 4.2.5 Future developments in the population surveys 92 4.2.6 Strengths and limitations of survey data 93 4.3 Cancer registration 94 4.3.1 Summary of the strengths and limitations of cancer registration data to monitor and measure access 98 4.4 Registration and notification of vital events 98 4.4.1 Registration of births and deaths 99 4.4.2 Notification of congenital anomalies 105 4.4.3 Notification of abortions 105 4.4.4 Confidential enquiries 106 4.4.5 Access to health care in population-based registration and notification data 111 4.5 Discussion 119 Section 5 Consultation with data users 122 5.1 Conclusion 125 Section 6 Case studies 127 6.1 The mental health of older people 130 6.1.1 Introduction 130 6.1.2 Types of mental illness 131 6.1.3 Who provides services for older people with mental illness? 132 6.1.4 Policy issues for older people’s mental health services............................................. 134 6.1.5 Routine datasets relating to older people’s mental health 135 6.1.6 To what extent can existing data be used to measure and monitor access to older people’s mental health services 136 6.1.7 Application of the Framework for Access to data sources for the mental health of older people 137 © NCCSDO 2006 3 Identification and evaluation of standardised datasets for measuring and monitoring access to health care 6.2 Maternity and neonatal care 152 6.2.1 Introduction 152 6.2.2 Who provides maternity and neonatal care? 152 6.2.3 Policy issues relating to access to maternity and neonatal care 152 6.2.4 Routine datasets relating to maternity and neonatal health care 155 6.2.5 Adequacy of existing data sources for measuring and monitoring access to maternity and neonatal health care 155 6.3 Cancer 175 6.3.1 Introduction 175 6.3.2 Definition of cancer and its prevalence 175 6.3.3 Who provides cancer services? 176 6.3.4 Government targets and policies relating to cancer 177 6.3.5 Major policies of the last ten years 177 6.3.6 Routine datasets relating to cancer 180 6.3.7 Summary of the extent to which existing data sources can be used to measure and monitor access to cancer services 180 6.4 Coronary Heart Disease 185 6.4.1 Introduction 185 6.4.2 Policy issues relating to access to Coronary Heart Disease care 185 6.4.3 Routine datasets relating to Coronary Heart Disease health care 189 6.4.4 Adequacy of existing data for measuring and monitoring access to coronary heart disease care 190 6.4.5 Conclusions 192 6.5 Charging for NHS services 207 6.5.1 Introduction 209 6.5.2 The impact of NHS prescription charges on access to treatment 210 6.5.3 Information sources on prescribing charges to monitor and measure access to health care 210 6.5.4 The impact of charging for dental services on access to treatment 212 6.5.5 Information sources on dental service charges to monitor and measure access to health care 214 6.5.6 The impact of charging for ophthalmic services on access to treatment 214 6.5.7 Information sources on ophthalmic services charges to monitor and measure access to health care 214 6.5.8 The impact of charging for non clinical services on access to treatment 215 6.5.9 Information sources on non clinical service charges to monitor and measure access to health care 215 6.5.10 The impact of charging on access to social care 215 6.5.11 Information sources on local authority charges to monitor and measure access to health care 216 6.5.12 Summary 217 6.6 Transport and access to health care 221 6.6.1 Introduction 221 © NCCSDO 2006 4 Identification and evaluation of standardised datasets for measuring and monitoring access to health care 6.6.2 Issues relating to transport and access to health care 221 6.6.3 Routine datasets relating to transport and access to health care 223 6.6.4 Adequacy of existing data sources for measuring and monitoring transport and access to health care 225 6.6.5 Conclusions 227 Section 7 Summary, discussion and recommendations 233 7.1 Summary of findings and issues identified in each section 233 7.1.1 Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) 233 7.1.2 Data from Primary Care 235 7.1.3 Community data collections 235 7.1.4 Staffing data collections to measure access 235 7.1.5 Communicable disease data 236 7.1.6 Surveys and the Census 236 7.1.7 Vital statistics 237 7.1.8 Consultation with data users 237 7.1.9 Case studies 237 7.2 Discussion 241 7.3 Conclusions 242 7.4 Recommendations 243 References ..............................................................................245 Appendices Appendix A Letter on data collections from all providers 265 Appendix B Items in datasets described in the Report 295 Appendix C The Framework For Access applied to the datasets reviewed in the Report 347 Appendix D The development of NHS performance ratings 382 Appendix E Glossary 414 © NCCSDO 2006 5 Identification and evaluation of standardised datasets for measuring and monitoring access to health care Tables Table 1 Framework for access: populations 26 Table 2 Minimum standards for admitted patient care data items 36 Table 3 Average daily number of available beds, by sector, England, 1995-96 to 2001-02 47 Table 4 Diseases notifiable (to Local Authority Proper Officers) under the Public Health (Infectious Diseases) Regulations 1988 67 Table 5 Summary of health service data sources and the Access Continuum 76 Table 6 Items in the Psychiatric Morbidity Survey 91 Table 7 The work programmes of CESDI 1993-99 108 Table 8 Summary of population-based data sources and the Access Continuum 115 Table 9 Estimated prevalence of dementia among people aged 65 and over 132 Table 10 Staff and services involved in care of older people with mental illness 133 Table 11 Numbers of hospital beds and places in residential and nursing care homes for people with mental illness, England, 1994-95 to 2000-01 134 Table 12 Admissions to NHS hospitals under mental illness specialties by sex and age group, rate per 1000 population, England 1994-95 to 2001-02 134 Table 13 Case study 1 - Data sources relating to the mental
Recommended publications
  • Private Finance Initiative in the UK Health Sector Introduction
    Private Finance Initiative in the UK Health Sector Professor Allyson Pollock Queen Mary College, University of London 1 Introduction - PFI and PPP (1) In this presentation we shall be talking about the “Private Finance Initiative”, using this term, PFI, to refer to private investment in the public sector. We shall be dealing with PFI as a specific form of “Public-Private Partnership” (PPP) 2 Introduction - PFI and PPP (2) We shall be dealing with private investment in the National Health Service, an “all-national” service in the UK, though, as we shall see there is a trend towards decentralization. We shall not, by an large, be dealing with PFI at local authority level, or with social services that are delivered at local authority level, although PFI is also to be found at this level. 3 Origins of PFI The Private Finance Initiative (PFI) was launched by the Conservative government in 1992 as an alternative to government grant and government borrowing for public sector investment. Programme given impetus in 1995. Private opportunity, public benefit; progressing the private finance initiative 4 Status of PFI Policy now However, the first large projects for hospitals and schools were not signed until the Labour administration came to power in 1997. Private finance has been a major plank of UK government policy and the bulk of most Departmental (Ministerial) capital investment projects are undertaken in this way. By 2010, <<749 deals have been signed at a value of £48.4 billion pounds sterling in the UK (app. $92 billion USD) 5 Previous funding of investment in health sector Government formerly raised investment funds through borrowing, gilts (Government bonds) or through taxation.
    [Show full text]
  • Allyson Pollock & David Price
    Policy Paper Duty to care: In defence of universal health care Prof Allyson M Pollock and David Price May 2013 Series: A Social State for 2015 December 2012 marked the 70th anniversary of the Beveridge Report, significant not only for its content but also for its context. In the midst of World War II, with a budget deficit and national debt that makes today’s look negligible, the Report laid the basis for the radical reforms introduced by the Labour Government in 1945. If war-time Britain could summon up the energy and hope to build a better world in 1945, this generation certainly can too. Seventy years ago the Beveridge Report announced the pursuit of a new settlement, one that would dramatically change the structure of Britain for the better. With this in mind, this series of work looks at what Beveridge’s analysis of society can teach us about the Giant Evils of today and how we use this to chart an alternative course for a welfare state - or Social State - fit for a new settlement in 2015. This paper was commissioned as part of the series to address the Giant Evil of ‘disease’ and to propose new policy priorities for health after the next election. Authors Allyson Pollock is Professor of Public Health Research and Policy at Queen Mary, University of London. Allyson set up and directed the Centre for International Public Health Policy at the University of Edinburgh, and prior to that she was Head of the Public Health Policy Unit at UCL and Director of Research & Development at UCL Hospitals NHS Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health Meets Law: Are There Sufficient Legal Safeguards to Ensure Access to Public Health Care for All?
    Medico-Legal Journal (2008) Vol. 76 Part 4, 118–132 © Medico-Legal Society 2008 118 The Medico-Legal Society A meeting of the Society was held at the Royal Society of Medicine, 1 Wimpole Street, London W1, on Thursday, 8 May 2008. The President, Mr Bertie Leigh, was in the Chair. Public Health Meets Law: Are There Sufficient Legal Safeguards to Ensure Access to Public Health Care for All? Professor Allyson Pollock Professor of International Health Policy and Assistant Principal of the University of Edinburgh The President: Good evening everybody. It gives with Richard Stein, of Leigh Day who brilliantly me enormous pleasure to welcome Professor Pollock helped take this case to judicial review (which failed this evening to lecture to us. I imagine most people initially but succeeded in the Court of Appeal). The in this room are thoroughly familiar with her writ- process was long and very traumatic for the local ings and her valued polemics on behalf of the NHS patients and GP and although the Court of Appeal and I sometimes think she is the only person who found for the public side, the action only delayed the seems to understand what is happening to the health privatisation process. service and to be capable of articulating what we all Today, general practice is being taken over from feel and, as it were, to unzip the disasters that are local doctors and being operated by health care being brought upon us by PFI, which is in my view organisations. Despite protests and a recent BMA damaging our great British institution.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF EPUB} NHS Plc the Privatisation of Our Health Care by Allyson M
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} NHS plc The Privatisation of Our Health Care by Allyson M. Pollock NHS plc: The Privatisation of Our Health Care by Allyson M. Pollock. Pollock AM, Roderick P, Price D. Response to NHSE/I consultation, “Integrating care: next steps to building strong and effective integrated care systems across England”. 08 Jan 2021. download. Pollock AM, Clements L, Harding-Edgar L. Why we need a national care service – and how to build one. Tribune 22 Jun 2020. Pollock AM, Price D. PFI and the National Health Service in England. 2013. download. Godden S, Price D, Pollock AM. The impact of privatisation on the provision of health services in Britain and the implications of market mechanisms for public services. Criminal Justice Alliance 2010. Pollock AM. The privatisation of the UK NHS. Reykjavik: 2008. Leys C, Player S, Pollock AM. Nuclear medicine in the transition to private clinical care. Nuclear Medicine Communications 2007;28:586–7. download. Pollock AM, Price D, Viebrock E, Miller E, Watt G. The market in primary care. BMJ 2007 Sep 6;335(7618):475–7. download: BMJ_2007_Pollock_MarketInPrimaryCare. Pollock AM. The new profiteers. The Guardian. 2007. Pollock AM. What Sicko doesn’t tell you. The Guardian. 2007. Pollock AM, Price D. Privatising primary care. British Journal of General Practice 2006;565–6. download. Pollock AM. NHS plc: the privatisation of our health care. 2nd ed. London: Verso 2005. Pollock AM, Price D, Player S. The private finance initiative: a policy built on sand. London: UNISON 2005. download. Pollock AM. Markets will value cash over caring.
    [Show full text]
  • Why We Should Be Concerned About Accountable Care Organisations in England’S NHS
    Pollock AM, Roderick P. Why we should be concerned about accountable care organisations in England’s NHS. BMJ 2018, 30: k343. DOI link https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k343 ePrints link http://eprint.ncl.ac.uk/pub_details2.aspx?pub_id=245584 Date deposited 06/02/2018 Copyright For personal use only: See rights and reprints http://www.bmj.com/permissions Newcastle University ePrints | eprint.ncl.ac.uk BMJ 2018;360:k343 doi: 10.1136/bmj.k343 (Published 30 January 2018) Page 1 of 5 Analysis ANALYSIS Why we should be concerned about accountable care organisations in England’s NHS The government and NHS England's plans for a major reorganisation of the health and adult social care system must come under greater scrutiny, argue Allyson Pollock and Peter Roderick Allyson M Pollock professor of public health, Peter Roderick principal research associate Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK The introduction of accountable care organisations (ACOs) into documents, although these might now change as a result of the the English NHS signals a major reorganisation of the health recently announced consultation. According to NHS England, and adult social care system. Plans for ACOs were proceeding the “ACO model simplifies governance and decision making, without the usual public consultation followed by an act of brings together funding streams and allows a single provider parliament. However, after the launch of a judicial review (in organisation to make most decisions about how to allocate which AMP is a claimant and PR is assisting the claimants), resources and design care for its local population.”8 the government and NHS England have now announced there The draft ACO contract is intended to facilitate the use of two 1 will be a national public consultation in the spring.
    [Show full text]
  • (PFI) Public Private Partnerships
    TheThe useuse ofof PrivatePrivate FinanceFinance InitiativeInitiative (PFI)(PFI) PublicPublic PrivatePrivate PartnershipsPartnerships (PPPs)(PPPs) inin NorthernNorthern IrelandIreland Mark Hellowell, David Price and Allyson M Pollock, Centre for International Public Health Policy, University of Edinburgh Northern Ireland Map by permission of Land & Property Services © Crown Copyright 2008 This report was commissioned by NIPSA Northern Ireland Public Service Alliance, 54 Wellington Park, Belfast BT9 6DP Index Page(s) Executive Summary ................................................................................................1 Introduction .............................................................................................................2 i What is PPP? ......................................................................................................2 ii Financing and funding in the public sector ..........................................................3 Section 1: The use of PPP in NI - current scale and plans for expansion ........4 1.1 Capital investment through PPPs signed and in procurement ........................4 1.2 Government departments involved in PPP ......................................................5 1.3 The impact of PPP on NI revenue budgets ......................................................6 1.3.1 Actual commitments on signed schemes ...............................................6 1.3.2 Estimated future payments for schemes in negotiation .........................7 1.4 Plans for PPP from 2012
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciling Equity and Choice? Foundation Hospitals and the Future of the NHS
    Reconciling Equity and Choice? Foundation Hospitals and the future of the NHS John Mohan A C A T A L Y S T W O R K I N G P A P E R Published in March 2003 by Catalyst 150 The Broadway London SW19 1RX Telephone 020 7733 2111 email [email protected] www.catalystforum.org.uk ISBN 1 904508 04 9 The views in this paper are those of the individual author and not necessarily those of Catalyst. 2 Contents Executive Summary 5 1 Introduction 7 2 New times, new Labour, new NHS 9 The disavowal of planning 9 The changing social and economic landscape 11 A mutualist revival? 12 3 The implications of Foundation Trusts 14 Planning 14 Patient choice 14 Borrowing powers 15 Asset disposals 16 Pay policy 17 Privatisation 17 Private patient income 17 “Co-payments” and charging 17 Unregulated commercial activity 18 Lessons from abroad 18 Democracy and accountability 19 Which community? 19 Can mutualised healthcare work? 20 Regulation 21 Patient selection 21 Cost-shifting 22 Regulatory disputes 22 4 Conclusion: pragmatism, principles and the fragmentation of the NHS 24 Notes 26 About Catalyst 29 3 John Mohan is Professor of Geography at the University of Portsmouth. He has published widely in academic and professional journals on historical and contemporary geographies of health and health care, and is the author of A National Health Service?, 1995, A United Kingdom? Economic, Social and Political Geographies, 1999, and Planning, Markets and Hospitals, 2002. Acknowledgements My thanks to Martin McIvor, Allyson Pollock and Martin Gorsky for comments and suggestions for further reading.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Finance Initiative Written Evidence
    House of Commons Treasury Committee Private Finance Initiative Written Evidence Only those submissions written specifically for the Committee and accepted by the Committee as evidence are included. Ordered to be published Tuesday 17 May 2011 List of written evidence 1 North Yorkshire Waste Action Group 3 2 Nick Collard 10 3 British Medical Association 19 4 Colin Raynor 23 5 Martin Blaiklock, Consultant, Infrastructure and energy Project Finance 31 6 Royal Institute of British Architects 38 7 Lisa Smeaton 43 8 John Sullivan 44 9 PricewaterhouseCoopers 45 10 Canmore Partnership Ltd 53 11 NHS Confederation 59 12 John Laing 64 13 Trampower 70 14 CBI 72 15 Hogan Lovells LLP 78 16 Donald Roy 84 17 Skanska 87 18 Greg Dropkin & Sam Semoff 94 19 Balfour Beatty 99 20 Health Care Audit Consultants Ltd 107 21 John Patrick Heawood 114 22 BDO LLP 118 23 Kent Police 124 24 Dr Yseult Marique, Lecturer, University of Essex 129 25 Ron Hodges 137 26 Edward Milner 142 27 UK Contractors Group Ltd 143 28 Andrew Barrie, Vice President Operations & Jon Mitchell, Development Director, KBR International Government & Defence 150 29 Dr Richard Thorne 156 30 Meridiam Infrastructure 157 31 PPP Forum 164 32 Dundas & Wilson C.S. LLP 172 33 Foundation Trust Network 180 34 Mr Geoff Haley, Global Chairman, International Project Finance Association 183 35 Dr Andrew Edkins, Graham Ive & Murray 194 36 CIPFA 200 37 Bill MacKeith, Founding member, Oxon PFI Alert Group (established 1999), 206 Committee member, Oxon Keep Our NHS Public, Assistant secretary, Oxford & District
    [Show full text]