DOCSLIB.ORG

Individual TV Market Revenue for 1962 Compared with 1961

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Individual TV Market Revenue for 1962 Compared with 1961 ductions: Joel Chaseman, gm. WBC Pro- 20%; Thomas B. Rice, 11%; Albert L. W. C. Woodall Jr. Stations -WBBK Blake- grams Sales: Alvin Sussman, vp and gm. Butler, 14.9 %, and others. Headquarters: ly (76%), WDWD Dawson (50%), WINO Ownership: Westinghouse Electric Corp., 300 South Stafford Rd., Winston -Salem, Widner (33 %), WGRA Cairo (25%), which manufactures electronic and com- N. C: Park 3 -4353. WFPM Fort Valley (25%) all Georgia,. munications equipment, home appliances, Wisconsin Valley Television Stations and WGSW Greenwood, S.C. (37.5%). air brakes, x -ray machines, electric light WMTV(TV) Madison and WSAU -TV- J. W. Woodruff Jr. Stations- WRBL -AM- bulbs, elevators, etc. Wausau, both Wisconsin. Ownership: FM -TV Columbus (30.4%). WGPC -AM- Martha White Mills Inc. -See H. Calvin Wausau Record Herald, 25.9 %; Wisconsin FM Albany (55 %), and WAZA Bainbridge Young. Rapids Tribune, 6.5 %; Marshfield News (40 %), all Georgia. Radio. Herald, 12.9%; Rhinelander News, 8.6 %: Don E. Whitman-See Community Merrill Herald, 8.6% and Charles Lemke, D. E. Woodson-See Frontier Broadcast- Jane Whitbread -See Fisher Stations. 27.2 %. ing. David R. Worley Stations-KOKE Austin, John Hay Whitney -See Corinthian; also John P. Wilmer -See Stevens -Wilmer. 50% of KWBA Baytown, both Tex., and Herald -Tribune Radio Network. WHY Television System- WKY -AM -TV KLEA Lovington, N. M. Wichita Tv Stations- KARD -TV Wichita. Oklahoma City; WTVT (TV) Tampa, Fla.; Ralph G. Worater -See Bluegrass Broad- KCKT (TV) Great Bend, KGLD (TV) KTVT (TV) Fort Worth, Tex. Ownership: casting. Garden City, all Kansas, and KOMC (TV) Oklahoma Publishing Co., 100 %. Jack D. Wrath r Jr .-See Transcontinent McCook, Neb. Ownership: George M. Stations. Brown, 13.9 %; Charles L. Brown, 27.33 %; Theodore J. Wolf-See Krisik-Wolf -Stur- W. A. Grant, 5.4% and others. devant- Dustin Stations. Malcolm D. Wymand-See Northern Wy- D. M. Wiggins -See Junell- Wiggins Sta- Mitchell Wolfson -See Wometco. oming. tions. H. Calvin Young Stations-WENO Madi- T. D. Wiggins -See Junell- Wiggins Sta- Wometco Enterprises Stations -WTVJ son, Tenn.; WYAM Bessemer, Ala.; WGUS tions. (TV) Miami, Fla.; WLOS- AM -FM -TV North Augusta, S. C., KIIX(TV) Los An- Arthur Wilkerson Stations -WLIL Lenoir, Asheville, N.C.; KVOS -TV Bellingham, geles. Ownership: Mr. Young and Martha all Wash. and 47.5% of WFGA-TV Jackson- White Mills Inc. are joint owners of WLIK Newport and WLIJ Shelbyville. ville, Fla. Mitchell Wolfson, pres; Louis WENO and own 95% of KIIX. Mr. Young Tenn. Owned 100% each by Mr. Wilkerson. Wolfson II, vp; Richard F. Wolfson, vp owns 70% of WYAM and 37.5% of WGUS. Williams- Bertholf Stations-KUTT Fargo, and asst secy; Jack Waxenberg, vp; Rich- Martha White Mills Inc. owns 50% of N. D.; KOYN Billings, Mont.; KQDY ard D. Windatt, vp (finances); Elmer H. WGUS. Jerome Glaser owns 25% of Minot, N. D. D. Gene Williams and Del- Radloft, treas; Arthur H. Hertz, contr. WYAM, 12.5% of WGUS and 5% of KIIX. bert BerthoIf each own 50% of KUTT & Headquarters: 306 N. Miami Ave., Miami KOYN; each owns 25% of KQDY. 32, Fla. Franklin 4 -6262. Zanesville Publishing Stations WHIZ - AM-FM-TV Zanesville Ohio; WTAP- -AM- Harold Winkler-See Pacifica Foundation. Allen M. Woodall Stations -WDAK Colum- TV Parkersburg, W. Va. Zanesville Pub- Winston-Salem Broadcasting Stations - bus (50 %), WMOG Brunswick (100 %), lishing Co. owns 60% of WHIZ and 63% WTOB Winston -Salem, 55% of WGIIP- WDAX McRae (68 %), WAYX Waycross of WHIZ -TV; 100% of WTAP. Principal TV High Point, both North Carolina; (25%), and WALG Albany (100 %), all stockholders: Clay, Arthur S., 47.5% each WSGN and WBMG (TV) Birmingham, Georgia. Allen M. Woodall, pres; Ed Wein. and William O. Littick, 5 %. Ala.; KTHT Houston, Tex. Ownership: nail sis mgr; Allen M. Woodall Jr., regi John G. Johnson, 10.2 %; James W. Coati, sis mgr. Headquarters: Martin Bldg., Co- Prod Zierle -See Midwestern Broadcast- 11.6%; Jonas S. Rice, 10 %; Earl F. Slick, lumbus, Ga. Fairfax 2 -5447. ing. Individual TV market revenue for 1962 compared with 1961 No. Sta- Total Total Total tions 1962 1962 1962 Gain Gain Gain Re- Rev- Ex- I n- Network or Spot or Local or port- enues' penses come' 1962 1961 Loss 1962 1961 Loss 1962 1961 Loss Markets ing (000) (000) (000) (000) (000) (000) (000) (000) (000) (000) (000) (000) Albany- Schenectady - Troy, N.Y. 3 $ 6,316 $ 4,432 $ 1,884. $1,769 $1,750 $ 19 $4,172 $3,702 $370 $1,120 $1,139 ($19) Albuquerque, N.M. 3 2,259 1,964 295 638 536 102 670 518 152 1,073 1,019 54 Amarillo, Tex. 3 2,247 2,080 168 530 525 (6) 627 597 30 1,169 1,020 149 Atlanta, Ga. 3 8,579 5,823 2,755 1,921 1,783 138 4,900 4,194 706 2,875 2,176 699 Bakersfield, Cal. 3 1,973 2,097 124 439 383 56 744 595 149 989 843 146 Baltimore 3 12,063 8,477 3,587 2,413 2,310 103 8,414 6,346 68 2,831 2,615 216 Beaumont -Port Arthur, Tex. 3 1,796 1,892 (96) 557 474 83 928 706 222. 530 524 *6 * Binghamton, N.Y. 3 2,782 1,735 1,047 Boston 3 24,026 12,252 11,774 4,214 4,115 99 17,541 15,008 2,533 6,028 5,163 864 Buffalo -Niagara Falls, N.Y. 3 12,044 7,844 4,200 2,482 2,363 119 8,698 7,447 1,250 3,100 2,791 309 Cedar Rapids -Waterloo, Iowa 3 2,689 2,201 488 952 859 93 1,399 1,349 50 534 508 26 Charles -Oak Hill- Hunting- ton, W.Va.-Ashland, Ky. 4 4,789 3,909 880 1,770 1,362 408 2,107 1,917 290 1,188 1,032 56 Charleston, S.C. 3 1,871 1,566 306 652 ** 515 ** ** 778 ** ** Chattanooga, Tenn. 3 2,164 2,144 21 740 689 51 895 796 99 670 591 79 Chicago 4 48,714 29,713 19,001 7,054 6,501 553 34,200 30,582 3,618 10,573 8,293 2,280 Cincinnati, Ohio 3 11,108 6,686 4,421 2,636 2,528 108 5,989 5,428 561 2,342 2,268 74 Cleveland 3 19,740 10,118 9,622 3,530 3,774 (244) 13,829 11,031 2,798 3,880 3,724 156 Colorado Springs - Pueblo, Colo. 3 1,562 1,575 (12) 365 358 7 531 478 5 709 608 101 Columbia, S.C. 3 2,236 1,735 501 531 478 53 928 824 104 721 481 340 Columbus, Ohio 3 9,390 5,891 3,499 1,769 1,850 (81) 5,722 4,611 1,111 2,478 2,121 357 Dallas -Fort Worth, Tex. 4 12,801 8,757 4,045 2,329 2,162 67 7,323 5,706 1,617 4,131 3,751 380 Denver 4 7,700 5,345 2,354 1,361 1,269 92 4,294 3,719 575 2,311 2,269 42 Dei Moines -Ames, Iowa 3 4,003 3,153 850 1,157 1,218 (61) 2,473 2,272 201 872 696 176 Detroit 3 20,233 10,969 9,264 4,737 4,578 159 12,708 11,240 1,468 5,287 4,180 1,107 El Paso, Tex. 3 2,107 2,000 106 482 375 107 682 83 1,053 885 168 Evansville, Ind. 3 2,196 2,013 183 794 697 97 763 667 (4) 746 789 (43) Flint-Saginaw -Bay City, Mich. 3 3,429 2,852 577 1,097 1,043 54 2,072 1,633 437 740 689 51 Fort Wayne, Ind. 3 2,585 1,950 635 880 833 47 1,143 1,130 13 774 644 130 Fresno -Hanford -Visalia, Cal. 6 3,498 3,840 342 913 869 44 1,822 1,521 301 1,287 904 383 Grand Rapids- Kalamazoo, Mich. 3 6,762 3,587 3,174 1,914 ** * 4,382 ** ** 629 ** ** Green Bay, Wis. 3 2,977 2,487 490 1,080 980 100 1,331 1,000 331 731 697 34 Greenville-Spartanburg, S.C.-Asheville, N.C. 4 3,324 2,550 774 1,005 906 99 1,586 1,451 I35 926 864 62 Harrisburg- Lancaster- York- Lebanon, Pa.. 5 4,734 3,717 1,017 1,453 1,458 (5) 2,946 2,759 187 1,183 1,149 34 Hartford -New Haven -New Britain -Waterbury, Conn. 5 10,370 6,760 3,610 2,009 1,889 120 7,927 7,059 868 1,336 1,304 32 3. * * * * * * * * * * * t Hilo. Hawaii 1964 BROADCASTING YEARBOOK PAGE A -145 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SEC News Digest, 03-30-1959
    e:URITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ~~~~ IDil@~~~ A brief summary of financial proposals filed with and actions by the S.E.C. (In ordering full text of Releases from Publications UnIt, E i t E number) FOR RELEASE March 30Ll=-::9c..:;5...:..9_ Statistical Release No. 1593 The SEC Index of Stock Prices, based on the ~losing prices of 265 common stocks for lhe week ended March 26, 1959. for the composite and by major industry groups compared with the preced- ing weck and with the highs and lows for 1958 and 1959, Is as follows: 1939 ; 100 1958 - 1959 Percent 3/26/59 3/20/59 Change High Low Coq>osite 410.3 414.6 - 1.0 417.2 299.0 Manufacturing 503.6 509.3 - 1.1 512.3 373.3 Durable Goods 469.3 475.9 - 1.4 481.0 332.2 Non-Durable Goods 525.5 530.1 - 0.9 534.8 402.2 Transportation 348.3 353.1 - 1.4 357.9 219.7 Utility 220.3 222.1 - 0.8 222.6 155.5 Trade, Finance lie Service 399.3 402.1 - 0.7 409.5 263.2 Mining 343.6 346.5 - 0.8 360.4 261.3 SEC TO CONFER ON "VARIABLE ANNUITY" REGULATORY PROBLEMS On March 23, The Supreme Court of the United States sustained the contention of the Secu - rities and Exchange Commission that variable annuity contracts are securities. These contracts have been offered and sold by Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company of America and Equity Annuity Life Insurance Company, who were defendants in an action by the Commdssion to enjoin their offer and sale until they had been registered under the Securitief Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasting in America; the Performance of Network Afficiates in the Top 50 Markets. INSTITUTION Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 082 483 EM 011 445 AUTHOR Johnson, Nicholas TITLE Broadcasting in America; The Performance of Network Afficiates in the Top 50 Markets. INSTITUTION Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 10 Aug 73 NOTE 173p. JOURNAL CIT Federal Communications Conmission Reports; v42 (2d Series)N1 August 10,1973 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS *Broadcast Industry; Certification; Citizen Partic4.pation; Commercial Television; *Equal Opportunities (Jobs); Evaluation; National Surveys; *Networks; Performance; Performance Criteria; *Programing (Broadcast); Television; *Television Surveys IDENTT_FIERS FCC; *Federal Communications Commission; Johnson (Nicholas); United States of America ABSTRACT This report represents the final attempt by outgoing Commissioner Nicholas Johnson to draw attention to the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) automatic renewal of licensees guilty of substandard performance. The report analyzes the performance of network affiliates in the top 50 television markets with respect to programing, female and minority employment, and ownership. It seeks to demonstrate the kind of analysis which can be made, to develop minimum standards, and to design an alternative to government regulation by using public disclosure of :;nformation to spur the industry to improve its performance and to motivate the public to challenge substandard licensees. The analyses of performance are based upon public data supplied by licensees to the FCC; in three separate chapters criteria on programing, employment, and ownership are developed from inspections of the data and the stations are rank-ordered according to their performance.it fourth chapter discusses what citizens can do to improve television in their community. Six appendixes and 17 tables provide detailed data on approximately 150 stations.
    [Show full text]
  • For Public Inspection Comprehensive
    REDACTED – FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION COMPREHENSIVE EXHIBIT I. Introduction and Summary .............................................................................................. 3 II. Description of the Transaction ......................................................................................... 4 III. Public Interest Benefits of the Transaction ..................................................................... 6 IV. Pending Applications and Cut-Off Rules ........................................................................ 9 V. Parties to the Application ................................................................................................ 11 A. ForgeLight ..................................................................................................................... 11 B. Searchlight .................................................................................................................... 14 C. Televisa .......................................................................................................................... 18 VI. Transaction Documents ................................................................................................... 26 VII. National Television Ownership Compliance ................................................................. 28 VIII. Local Television Ownership Compliance ...................................................................... 29 A. Rule Compliant Markets ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasting
    WS 3nn o zo =-<on cri r- sJ Broadcasting p-...D < THE BUSINESSWEEKLY OF TELEVISION AND RADIO CUí n -n O .A r Networks winner in television code showdown. p21 3rrnr PERSPECTIVE 1968: A mood of cautious optimism. p38 z-n;v rn AT &T proposes $25- million -a -year rate increase. p78 NAB promises tough fight for spectrum space. p88 o COMPLETE INDEX PAGE 7 cia.. 14 e Vest time to see us is when we're and beautiful too. And that'll tell you working hard. Walk into our research of expecting to see you. a lot about our company and our department and start asking some fast neak into 3 East 54th Street or any philosophy. Walk through our halls honest questions. You'll get some fast ne of our other offices and take a close and see our people. honest answers. And when you're all ook at the Edward Petty Company. You'll notice our shipping clerks. finished checking, don't stop there. Ile first thing you should see secretaries, printers, estimators, Do some comparison shopping.. s our receptionist. marketing specialists, Sneak into the offices of any of the other he's bright and she's beautiful. promotion writer, clerical help, top television representatives hen you look at the furnishings and salesmen and executive staff all have in the city, and see how they hold up ecor, you'll find that they're bright something in common. They're all under a surprise visit. The representative is sometimes the only part of your station that people ever get to see.
    [Show full text]
  • Resume-Standard For
    RESUME OF COHEN, DIPPELL AND EVERIST, P.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS RADIO AND TELEVISION SEPTEMBER 2021 SERVING THE BROADCAST INDUSTRY SINCE 1937 TELEPHONE: (202) 898-0111 E-MAIL: [email protected] FAX: (202) 898-0895 COHEN, DIPPELL AND EVERIST, P.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS RADIO-TELEVISION INTRODUCTION The present firm of Cohen, Dippell and Everist, P.C. is a consulting engineering firm in the field of communications. This firm and its predecessors have been in business for more than seventy years, having had offices in the Munsey Building, Washington, D.C. from 1937 to September, 1979; 1015 l5th Street, N.W. from 1979 to 1989, 1300 L Street, N.W., Suite 1100 from 1989 to 2010, and at present, located at 1420 N Street, N.W., Suite One, Washington, D.C. 20005. This firm is the only communications consulting engineering firm located in Washington, DC (just blocks away from the Federal Communications Commission). Donald G. Everist, a registered professional engineer, is President and Secretary. Julius Cohen, past president, retired from the partnership on December 31, 1992 and served as Chairman Emeritus until his passing on May 2, 1993. Ralph E. Dippell, Jr. remained active in the firm until his passing on October 30, 1992. Julius Cohen was initially employed by Page and Davis, Consulting Engineers. The company's name changed to George C. Davis in 1942. Julius Cohen and Ralph E. Dippell, Jr., were employed by the firm, George C. Davis Consulting Engineers, before becoming partners in 1956. George C. Davis, the senior partner, retired in January, 1970. From 1970 to January, 1973, Julius Cohen and Ralph E.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC & FRC Reported Cases, 1928
    FCC & FRC REPORTED CASES 1928 - 2010 February 1, 2010 A/B Financial, Inc. v. FCC, 316 U.S.App.D.C. 191, 76 Action for Children’s Television v. FCC, 827 F.Supp. 4 F.3d 1244 (1996) * (D.D.C. 1993), aff’d, 313 U.S.App.D.C. 261, 59 F.3d 1249 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1072 Abacoa Radio Corp. v. FCC, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 218, (1996) 358 F.2d 849 (1966) ACS of Anchorage, Inc. v. FCC, 351 U.S.App.D.C. 317, ABC, Inc. v. FCC, 682 F.2d 25 (2nd Cir. 1982) 290 F.3d 403 (2002) Achernar Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 314 U.S.App.D.C. Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Comm. v. FCC, 109, 62 F.3d 1441 (1995) 220 U.S. App.D.C. 241, 680 F.2d 790 (1982) Accuracy in Media, Inc. v. FCC, 172 U.S.App.D.C. 188, Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Comm. v. FCC, 521 F.2d 288 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 387 U.S. App.D.C. 258, 572 F.3d 903 (2009) (1976) Adams Communications Corp. v. FCC, 333 Action for Children's Television v. FCC, 183 U.S.App.D.C. 45, 159 F.3d 635 (1998) * U.S.App.D.C. 437, 564 F.2d 458 (1977) Adams Telcom, Inc. v. FCC, 302 U.S.App.D.C. 265, Action for Children's Television v. FCC, 244 997 F.2d 955 (1993) U.S.App.D.C. 190, 756 F.2d 899 (1985) Adams Telcom, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC-07-24A1.Pdf
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-24 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Shareholders of Univision Communications ) BTCCT-20060718AGO et al. Inc. ) (Transferor) ) ) and ) ) Broadcasting Media Partners, Inc. ) (Transferee) ) ) For Transfer of Control of Univision ) Communications, Inc., and Certain Subsidiaries, ) Licensees of KUVE-TV, Green Valley, Arizona et ) al. ) ) In the Matter of ) ) Univision Cleveland, LLC ) NAL/Acct. No. 0741420022 ) FRN No. 0005794177 ) For Renewal of License of Station WQHS-TV, ) File No. BRCT - 20050601BER Cleveland, Ohio. ) Facility ID No. 60556 ) In the Matter of ) ) KDTV License Partnership, G.P. ) ) For Renewal of License of Station KDTV(TV), ) File No. BRCT-20060803APD San Francisco, California ) Facility ID No. 33778 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: March 16, 2007 Released: March 27, 2007 By the Commission: Chairman Martin and Commissioner Tate issuing separate statements; Commissioner Copps and Adelstein approving in part, concurring in part, and issuing separate statements. I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Commission has under consideration applications listed in the attached Appendices that seek consent to transfer control of licensee subsidiaries of Univision Communications Inc. (“Univision”), that hold 41 full-power, 14 class A, five low-power, and five television translator licenses, as well as 73 full-power radio licenses (55 FM and 18 AM) and nine FM translator licenses, from Univision’s current Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-24
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL REGISTER V O L U M E 33 NU M BER 110 Thursday, June 6,1968 Washington, D.C
    FEDERAL REGISTER V O L U M E 33 NU M BER 110 Thursday, June 6,1968 Washington, D.C. Pages 8383-8419 Agencies in this issue— Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Business and Defense Services Administration Civil Aeronautics Board Coast Guard Commodity Credit Corporation Consumer and Marketing Service Customs Bureau Engineers Corps Federal Aviation Administration Federal Communications Commission Federal Crop Insurance Corporation Federal Power Commission Fiscal Service Fish and Wildlife Service Interior Department Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau Maritime Administration Post Office Department Securities and Exchange Commission Veterans Administration Detailed list o f Contents appears inside. S'Y ear Compilât ions of Presidential Documents Supplements to Title 3 of the Code of Federal Regulations The Supplements to Title 3 of the Code the President and published in the Federal of Federal Regulations contain the full text Register during the period June 2, 19 38 - of proclamations, Executive orders, reor­ December 31, 1963. Tabular finding aids ganization plans, trade agreement letters, and subject indexes are included. The in­ and certain administrative orders issued by dividual volumes are priced as follows: 1938—1943 Compilation* 1949—1953 Compilation—$7.00 1943-1948 Compilation— $7.00 1954-1958 Compilation— $4.00 1959—1963 Compilation— $6.00 Compiled by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 * Temporarily out of print r r n r n i l F i r P 'I C T r F I Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or F l III* firm I lilLl I r if on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, Nationa a Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration (mail address Nationa Area Code 202 Phone 962“8626 Archives Building, Washington, D.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Wzzm 13 Channel Guide
    Wzzm 13 channel guide Continue Slogan: website 13Web: www.wzzm13.com Email: visit website Programming: WMD on TitanTV.com Power/Height: 24,500 W /1064 ft - Service Area Digital Channel: 13 More websites on WMD-TV: Additional technical information: History of the call sign: 6/16/2009 W-M-TV: 10/10/0/0/0/0 2009 W 23/1962 WIIM: Origin of the Call Sign: Calls Look Upside Down Story Joining Network: ABC On Air Date: November 1, 1962 Owner: Gannett Phone: (616) 785-1313 Notes/History: 6/2009: Building Permit granted to increase capacity from 16,500 W to 24500. The license for coverage is granted 5/2011. 6/13/2009: Analogue broadcasts on Channel 13 end and digital broadcasts go from Ch. 39 to Ch. 13. 4/2008: Building permit for digital objects on Channel 13 to be used after the digital transition in February 2009. 1/2003: Coverage License granted for ERP modification from 316,000 watts and 1,001 feet to 257,000 watts 1064 feet 6/2002: Building permit outstanding for ERP modification from 316,000 watts 1001 feet to 257,000 t 10 64 feet 1/31/1997: Acquired Gannett 1995: Acquired Argyle 1989: Acquired Northstar Television 1986: Acquired New York Communications Price 1985: Acquired by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Co. 1978: Acquired by Wometco Enterprises 11/1/1962: In the air, owned by Western Michigan Telecaters. The WiIM call sign was not used on the air when WJIM-TV Lansing objected to the use of a sign that would be easily confused with them.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms
    INFORMATION TO USERS This dissertation was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]