CHE/13/00420/FUL Tel. No: (01246) 345786 Plot No: 2/1562 Ctte Date: 18 Th November 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CHE/13/00420/FUL Tel. No: (01246) 345786 Plot No: 2/1562 Ctte Date: 18 Th November 2013 Case Officer: Sarah Scott File No: CHE/13/00420/FUL Tel. No: (01246) 345786 Plot No: 2/1562 Ctte Date: 18 th November 2013 ITEM 4 INSTALLATION OF ONE (1) MID SCALE WIND TURBINE OF MAXIMUM HEIGHT TO TIP OF 84M AND INCLUDING: UPGRADED AND NEW ACCESS TRACK, A HARDSTANDING AREA, A SMALL SUBSTATION ENCLOSURE, TEMPORARY GUYED METEOROLOGICAL MAST AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE - REVISED HERITAGE ASSESSMENT AND SHADOW FLICKER REPORT RECEIVED ON 17/10/2013 AT LAND TO WEST OF DUCKMANTON AND NORTH OF TOM LANE, CHESTERFIELD, DERBYSHIRE FOR ENERGY PROSPECTS CO- OPERATIVE Local Plan: Open Countryside / Other Open Land Ward: Hollingwood & Inkersall 1.0 CONSULTATIONS DCC Highways Comments received 13/09/2013 – see report DCC Planning (inc. DCC Comments received Landscapes) 27/09/2013 – see report DCC Rights of Way Comments received 16/08/2013 – no objections given nearest RoW is some 300m away from turbine location DCC Archaeology Comments received 12/09/2013 – no objections in respect of below ground archaeology given the sites previous open cast history and advise that in respect of designated heritage assets the application is determined in line with English Heritage and local Conservation Officer advice English Heritage Comments received 12/09/2013 and 16/09/2013 – see report Environmental Services Comments received 30/08/2013 – see report Design Services Comments received 20/08/2013 – no objections subject to development according with the Council’s minimum standards for drainage Economic Development No comments received Environment Agency Comments received 15/08/2013 – no objections as proposal is of low environmental risk Yorkshire Water Comments received 16/08/2013 – no objections as YWS observations are not required Bolsover District Council (adj Comments received LPA) 12/09/0213 – concerns raised in respect of the impact of the proposal on the setting of Bolsover Castle; and the wider cumulative impact of various turbine proposals within the landscape of the Castle setting North East Derbyshire District No comments received Council (adj LPA) OFCOM Comments received 19/08/2013 – advising that it is not their policy to advise or get involved with any planning applications National Air Traffic Services Comments received 19/08/2013 – no objections Joint Radio Commission Comments received 19/08/2013 and 28/08/2013 – confirming that they do not foresee any potential problems based on known interference scenarios and the data provided Ministry of Defence Comments received 18/09/2013 – no objections Civil Aviation Authority No comments received Derbyshire Wildlife Trust Comments received 01/10/2013 and 08/10/2013 – see report Natural England Comments received 10/10/2013 – see report British Horse Society No comments received Coal Authority Comments received 15/10/2013 – no objection subject to condition requiring intrusive site investigations Conservation Officer Comments received 05/11/2013 – see report Ward Members No comments received Neighbours/Site 103 letters of representation Notice/Advertisement received 2.0 THE SITE 2.1 The site the subject of the application comprises of land at the former Arkwright open cast mine, off Tom Lane Duckmanton. The majority of the open cast site has since been reclaimed and the field specific to the application proposals is currently utilised for arable farming. 2.2 Access to the site is from Tom Lane to the south via a track which originally served the open cast site. The residential settlements of Duckmanton, Inkersall and Staveley / Poolsbrook lie to the east, west, and north of the site respectively. At the closest point the site lies 480m from the western fringe of Duckmanton and 1.35km from the eastern fringe of Inkersall. Several periphery dwellings lie to west / south west of the site approximately 600m from the proposals. 2.3 The M1 motorway is approximately 1km to the east of the proposal and links to Tom Lane via Markham Road. The A632 Chesterfield Road runs approximately 1.2km to the south and the Staveley Road / Inkersall Road runs approximately 450m to the west. In addition there are 400kW overhead transmission lines and pylons adjacent the west and north of the site towards Inkersall and Poolsbrook Country Park. 3.0 SITE HISTORY 3.1 CHE/13/00050/EIA - Screening request for a community wind turbine. Decision issued by CBC on 12/02/2013 advising that the proposal was regarded as EIA development which required a subsequent application for the development to be accompanied by an Environmental Statement. 3.2 Notwithstanding the screening opinion by CBC the applicant referred the same screening request to the Secretary of State National Planning Casework Unit (NPCU) for an independent screening decision. The NPCU responded to the applicants screening request on the 08/05/2013 advising that it was their view the development proposals did not constitute EIA development on the basis the matters of visual impact upon surrounding heritage assets could be addressed under normal working practices of the planning process. This over ruled the Councils view on the matter. 4.0 THE PROPOSAL 4.1 The application, which is submitted in full, proposes the erection of a single 84m high wind turbine with associated infrastructure as follows: • a temporary 50m high wind monitoring mast; • a substation adjacent the turbine containing the transformer, switchgear and metering equipment; • an associated hardstanding (for us by the crane during turbine erection); and • a 175m improved access track (inc. alterations to the existing track junction at Tom Lane). 4.2 The candidate turbine will be the 500kW Enercon E48 wind turbine which has a hub height of 60m, a rotor diameter of 48m and thus a maximum height to tip of 84m. The application submission details 3 no. further candidate turbines which all have a tip height of 84m, however should an alternative turbine be chosen the applicant indicates that any substitute will be required to match or better the environmental performance of the candidate turbine which forms the basis for all the assessments accompanying the application. 4.3 Prior to the installation of the wind turbine it is proposed that a temporary wind monitoring mast 50m in height will be erected on the same site to measure wind speeds and collect data. The mast, which will include an anemometer, is secured by guy ropes which are attached to 4 no. anchoring points which are sited at a radius 25m from the base of the mast. The guy ropes will extend from the mast at 5 no. vertical points (at intervals of approximately 9.4m, 18.8m, 28.1m, 37.5m and 47.0m). 4.4 The substation proposed will measure 5.1m x 3.1m x 2.5m high and will be located 31.5m south of the turbine. The hardstanding, also created to the south of the turbine itself, will measure 20m x 30m and will be accessed from a new 4m wide access track (incorporating 28m radius corners) created from the existing track located to the east of the site. Modifications are also proposed to the junction of the existing access track at Tom Lane to temporarily remove the fencing and gates and create a 28m radius track to allow access for construction vehicles. 4.5 In the application submission the proposed turbine is described as a community project and it is the applicants’ intention to set up a new co-operative to assist in raising capital to fund the turbine development. The creation of the co-operative will give local people an opportunity to invest in the project and become a member of the co-operative. The applicant submission details that local community will be offered the opportunity to invest between £250 and £20,000 in the project and thereafter revenue made from the sale of electricity generated by the turbine will be re-distributed to members of that co-operative proportionate to their investment. The applicant proposes that the co-operative will pay a proportion of the revenue generated to a local community fund (approx 1.5 – 2%, estimated to amount to between £5,000 and £7,000 per annum). It is the intention of the applicant to set up a Community Trust, to manage the community fund (in consultation with the local community). 4.6 The application is accompanied by the following additional documentation: Planning Application Documentation Booklet and Environmental Report; Planning Statement; Ecological Report (prepared by Wild Frontier Ecology) June 2013; Noise Assessment (prepared by ION Acoustics Ltd) May 2013; Heritage Assessment (prepared by CgMs Consulting) June 2013; Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (prepared by Viento Environmental Limited) June 2013. In addition to the above the application submission also contains documentation in respect of Initial Site Investigations, Screening, Aviation, Shadow Flicker and Telecom Utilities and TV. 4.7 A revised copy of the Heritage Statement (correcting a scaling error) and an addendum to the Shadow Flicker Assessments (expanding the assessment to include Duckmanton Primary School) were received on 17/10/2013. 5.0 CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 National / Local Planning Policy 5.1.1 The application site is situated on open countryside / other open land as defined in the Chesterfield Local Plan: Core Strategy 2011 - 2031. Having regard to the nature of the application proposals the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and Policy CS5 of the Core Strategy apply. 5.1.2 The NPPF (paragraph 98) directs that when determining planning applications for renewable energy development, Local Planning Authorities should: • not require applicants for renewable energy development to demonstrate the overall need for renewable or low carbon energy and also recognise that even small-scale projects provide a valuable contribution to cutting greenhouse gas emissions; and • approve the application if its impacts are (or can be made) acceptable. Once suitable areas for renewable and low carbon energy have been identified in plans, LPAs should also expect subsequent applications for commercial scale projects outside these areas to demonstrate that the proposed location meets the criteria used in identifying suitable sites.
Recommended publications
  • Michelle Smith Eversheds LLP Bridgewater
    Michelle Smith Our Ref: APP/R1010/A/14/2212093 Eversheds LLP Bridgewater Place Water Lane LEEDS LS11 5DR 12 March 2015 Dear Madam TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (SECTION 78) APPEAL BY ROSELAND COMMUNITY WINDFARM LLP: LAND EAST OF ROTHERHAM ROAD, BOLSOVER, DERBYSHIRE APPLICATION REF: 12/00159/FULEA 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Paul K Jackson BArch (Hons) RIBA, who held a public local inquiry which opened on 4 November 2014 into your client’s appeal against the decision of Bolsover District Council (the Council) to refuse planning permission for a windfarm comprising 6 wind turbines, control building, anemometer mast and associated access tracks on a site approximately 2.5km south of Bolsover between the villages of Palterton and Shirebrook, in accordance with application reference 12/00159/FULEA, dated 25 April 2012. 2. On 20 June 2014 the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, because it involves a renewable energy development. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed and planning permission refused. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions except where indicated otherwise, and agrees with his recommendation. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to that report.
    [Show full text]
  • Its Land, Fndustries & People
    DUCKIITANTON I.OOR Its Land, fndustries & people by G. Downs-Rose Dt CKtttAt{TON I.OOR, ITS LAI{D, INDUSTRIES AflD pEOpLE Copyrlght O G. Dorrns-Rose 1993 i |'r**J , ti h ,'*U c-,*,-f L'=--- ,, ?* -r Lo.*-,\ "^V-oxtAt- N". I of 1o DITCKIiANTON l,tOOR, ITS LAND, IIDUSTRIES AIID PEOPLE COTITEIITS l. Introductlon, page I 2. Early Hlstory, page 3 3. Ducknanton lioor ln t776, paEe 4 {. Farnlng Settlements on the l,ioor: 4.1. 1-g The Croft Settleuents, pp 6-20 4.2. l-7 The Farns, pp 21-36 5. Industrtal Settlenents on the ltioor: 5. 1 The Iron Uorks Coununtty, pp 37-+1 5.2 The Arkwright Tomr Conmunity,pp 4Z-S1 6. Ducknanton l{oor ln 1993, page 52 7. The Evldence From Fleld Names, page 54 8. liaps: Ducknanton Hoor ln 1776, page 2 Ducknanton ltloor ln 1837, page 10 Duckmanton lrbor ln 1919, page 3O 9. Plans: Duckaanton llorks Cottages, page 38 Arkwrtght Tonrn OId Vlllage, page 4{ 1O. Photograph: OId Arkrrlght Tour, Pre-lnprovement ff page 42 DUCKITANTON !|OOR,ITS LAND, ITIDUSTRIES AIID pEOpLE 1. INTRODTrcTION The locatlon name 'Ducknanton lrloor' ln North East Derbyshire occurred Ln records from the late slxteenth century and remalned ln use, e. g. by the Ordnance Survey, lnto the twentleth century long after lt had lost lts sl$nlf lcance. The nalre tms originatly used to denote that part of the lrlanor of Ducknanton wtrich remalned unenclosed lnto late uedlevar tlnes. For our purposes, lts boundaries (See lr{ap 1 oaEe 2) are those used in earller tlnes: the courses of brooks and civll boundarles.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Shale Gas in the UK
    Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Shale Gas in the UK A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Science and Engineering 2017 Jasmin Cooper School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science Table of Contents List of Tables 7 List of Figures 9 Abbreviations 10 Abstract 12 Declaration 13 Copyright Statement 13 Acknowledgements 14 Chapter 1: Introduction 15 1. Background 15 1.1. Shale gas and how it is extracted 15 1.2. Conventional gas and shale gas 19 1.3. Energy mix in the UK 22 1.4. UK shale gas 24 2. Aims and objectives 25 3. Thesis structure 26 4. Methodology 27 4.1. Goal and scope definition 27 4.2. Identification of sustainability issues and definition of indicators 29 4.3. Identification of electricity generation options 30 4.4. Definition of scenarios 31 4.5. Life cycle sustainability assessment 31 4.5.1. Environmental sustainability assessment 31 4.5.2. Economic sustainability assessment 33 4.5.3. Social sustainability assessment 34 4.5.4. Multi-criteria decision analysis 36 4.5.5. Data quality assessment 36 4.6. Conclusions and recommendations 37 References 39 Chapter 2: Shale gas: A review of the economic, environmental and social 48 sustainability Abstract 49 1. Introduction 50 2. Economic aspects 54 2.1. The US experience 54 2.1.1. Direct impacts 54 2.1.2. Indirect impacts 57 2.2. Other regions 58 3. Environmental aspects 61 3.1. Air emissions and impacts 61 3.1.1. GHG and climate change 61 3.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Avenue Hornbeam Drive Wingerworth Derbyshire S42 6SZ
    The Avenue Hornbeam Drive Wingerworth Derbyshire S42 6SZ Find us using what3words ///plants.splits.scratches THE AVENUE WINGERWORTH 01246 643267 [email protected] tiliahomes.co.uk A STUNNING COLLECTION OF 2, 3, 4 & 5 BEDROOM HOMES Healeys Print Group Reg. 2108 Welcome to The Avenue Nestled in the idyllic village of Wingerworth, The Avenue is an exceptional collection of two, three, four and five bedroom homes. With amazing surroundings and spectacular country views, The Avenue has become the creation of a new suburb that is placed at the heart of the Wingerworth community. This computer generated image is for illustrative purposes only. Its purpose is to give a feel for the development, not an accurate description of each property. Please enquire for further details. 1 Location At The Avenue, you will be ideally positioned just outside the busy town of Chesterfield. You can find an excellent range of local amenities which cater to your daily needs, as well as having an award-winning parkland and wildlife reserve adjacent to the development. 2 Hardwick Old Hall 09 15 A61 Built between 1587 and 1596 by Bess of Hardwick, one of the richest women of the Elizabethan age. 08 ARKWRIGHT TOWN 06 05 A619 CHESTERFIELD M1 BRAMPTON A617 BOYTHORPE A61 14 BIRDHOLME A617 04 WALTON A61 SUTTON SCARSDALE A617 01 SLATEPIT DALE 07 03 02 The Royal Oak Pub GRASSMOOR The oldest pub in Chesterfield which was WINGERWORTH A617 once a ‘rest house’ for the Knights Templars. A61 HOLMEWOOD 11 A61 10 16 13 12 Your nearest transport links Chesterfield Manchester M1 Train Station Airport Chesterfield Market One of the largest open-air markets in England, has a rich history dating back to 1165.
    [Show full text]
  • At a Meeting of the Parish Council Held in the Church at Duckmanton
    Sutton-cum-Duckmanton Parish Council At a meeting of the Parish Council held in the Church, Sutton Scarsdale on the 16th July 2018. 33/19 Members Present. Councillors N. Hough, M. Smart, B. Brocksopp, A. Clark, J. Stocks, K. Payne A. Foster and J. Foster. Also in attendance was Mr P. Goodwin - Clerk. 34/19 Apologies. District Councillors P. Kerry and S. Boyle and County Councillor N. Barker. 35/19 Councillors Absent. None. 36/19 Declaration of Members’ Interests. There were no declarations made in respect of any of the agenda items. 37/19 Public Speaking. Items from members of the public. None, as there were no members of the public present at the meeting. Police. The figures for June aren’t yet available; however, the Clerk will include these details in the minutes of the meeting following their availability on the police website. The Clerk has collated the figures for May and these are as follows:- Arkwright Town One incident of anti-social behaviour on School Lane One incident of anti-social behaviour on Rose Gardens One incident of criminal damage and arson on Rosling Way One incident of violence and sexual offence on Rosling Way Long Duckmanton One incident of anti-social behaviour on St. Peter’s Close One incident of violence and sexual offence on Chesterfield Road One other crime on Rectory Gardens One incident of anti-social behaviour near the petrol station on Chesterfield Road One burglary from the petrol station on Chesterfield Road District Council. The Clerk reported that the clearing up of the area around the Dell has still not taken place and he will try to arrange for someone from the District Council to attend a site meeting with parish councillors in order that everyone can be clear regarding the work that needs carrying out.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid&Health&Impact& Assessment'of'hs2
    ! Health'and' RAPID&HEALTH&IMPACT& Community'Safety' Department,' Derbyshire'County' ASSESSMENT'OF'HS2' Council' INITIAL&PREFERRED& ' DECEMBER'2013' ROUTE&IN&EASTERN& DERBYSHIRE! A synthesis of evidence from community profiling, review of the literature and community consultation, with recommendations to HS2 Ltd. for maximising health gains and mitigating negative health consequences in respect of the high-speed rail development proposal HS2 Phase 2 initial preferred route in Eastern Derbyshire Contributors$ Julie Hirst Health Improvement Principal, HIA Lead & Steering Group Chair Derbyshire County Council Dr Bruce McKenzie Clinical Lecturer and Hon. Specialty Registrar in Public Health University of Nottingham and Derbyshire County Council HS2$HIA$steering$group$members$ Cllr Dave Allen Cabinet Member, Health and Communities Derbyshire County Council James Arnold Joint Assistant Director of Planning Bolsover District Council Steve Canon Transport and Accessibility Manager Derbyshire County Council Michael Davie Public Health Development Co-ordinator Derbyshire County Council Morna Dudeney Senior Engineer, Environmental Services and HS2 Project Officer Derbyshire County Council Pete Edwards CEO Erewash Voluntary Action CVS Ltd (representing the county VCS Consortium 3D) Joanne Neville Senior Economic Development Officer Chesterfield Borough Council Andrew Raynor Public Health Manager Derbyshire County Council HIA$OF$HS2$IN$EASTERN$DERBYSHIRE$ 1! Jane Sheppard Public Health Development Worker Derbyshire County Council Rebecca Slack Housing
    [Show full text]
  • At a Meeting of the Parish Council Held in the Church at Duckmanton
    Sutton-cum-Duckmanton Parish Council At a meeting of the Parish Council held in the Arkwright Centre on the 12th February 2018. 123/18 Members Present. Councillors N. Hough, M. Smart, B. Brocksopp, J. Stocks, A. Clark, A. Foster, J. Foster and K. Payne. Also in attendance were District Councillor P. Kerry and Mr P. Goodwin - Clerk. 124/18 Apologies. District Councillor S. Boyle and County Councillor N. Barker. 125/18 Councillors Absent. None. 126/18 Declaration of Members’ Interests. There were no declarations made in respect of any of the agenda items. 127/18 Public Speaking. Items from members of the public. None as there were no members of the public present at the meeting. Police. The figures for January aren’t yet available; however, the Clerk will include these details in the minutes of the meeting following their availability on the police website. The Clerk has collated the figures for December and these are as follows:- December Arkwright Town One burglary on Lime Tree Grove One incident of violence and sexual offence on Lime Tree Grove One incident of violence and sexual offence near to the Arkwright Centre on Hardwick Drive One incident of vehicle crime on Rosling Way One incident of anti-social behaviour on Rosling Way One incident of vehicle crime on Rose Gardens Long Duckmanton One incident of violence and sexual offence on Cherry Tree Drive One incident of criminal damage and arson on Rectory Road One incident of violence and sexual offence on Chesterfield Road One incident of anti-social behaviour on Chesterfield Road One incident of theft and one vehicle crime at the petrol station on Chesterfield Road Sutton Scarsdale One burglary on Shire Lane 1 District Council.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 John H Newby Returning Officer
    STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED North East Derbyshire Election of Parish Councillors The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a Parish Councillor for Ashover Reason why Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer no longer nominated* ARMITAGE Greenbank, Hockley Armitage Elaine P James William Lane, Ashover, Chesterfield, S45 0ER BROCKSOPP White Lion House, Sanderson B W Christine Andrée Butts Road, Ashover, Chesterfield, S45 0AX COOK Farhill House, Milken Hitchenor R. John Lane, Ashover, Derbyshire, S45 0BB DRONFIELD 50 Malthouse Lane, Graves J S Stephen Charles Ashover, Chesterfield EARLY Lexley Gables, Banner N Nigel Hockley Lane, Ashover, Chesterfield, S45 0ER EARLY Lexley Gables, Kelly C M Rosemary Hockley Lane, Ashover, Chesterfield, S45 0ER FIDLER Porthlea, Alton Lane, Cookson P W Richard Littlemoor, Ashover, Derbyshire, S45 0BE HITCHENOR The Hollies, Hill Cook J Robert Road, Ashover, Derbyshire, S45 0BX MILLER Hill House, Hill Road, Whyatt P. Chris Ashover, Chesterfield, Derbyshire, S45 0BX STEVENS 96 Dale Road, Fanshawe J M Duncan Richard Matlock, DE4 3LU WILLMOT The Pines, Hill Top Fidler R Edward Road, Ashover, Chesterfield, Derbyshire, S45 0BZ *Decision of the Returning Officer that the nomination is invalid or other reason why a person nominated no longer stands nominated. The persons above against whose name no entry is made in the last column have been and stand validly nominated. Dated Wednesday 6 April 2011 John H Newby Returning Officer Printed and published by the
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B East Midlands Consortium HS2 Route Mitigation Study
    HS2 Phase 2a WDES Response Appendix B East Midlands Consortium - HS2 Route Mitigation Study, RTUKR-T40125-001 HS2 EIA Response Dec 2018 HS2 Phase 2a WDES Response Page intentionally blank HS2 EIA Response Dec 2018 East Midlands Consortium - HS2 Route Mitigation Study Jon Hall RTUKR-T40125-001 Issue 6 9th November 2018 NOTICE This document contains the expression of the professional opinion of SNC- Lavalin Rail & Transit Limited (SNC-Lavalin) as to the matters set out herein, using its professional judgment and reasonable care. It is to be read in the context of the agreement dated 20/12/2017 (the “Agreement”) between SNC-Lavalin and Derbyshire County Council (the “Client”), and the methodology, procedures and techniques used, SNC-Lavalin’s assumptions, and the circumstances and constraints under which its mandate was performed. This document is written solely for the purpose stated in the Agreement and for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Client, whose remedies are limited to those set out in the Agreement. This document is meant to be read as a whole, and sections or parts thereof should thus not be read or relied upon out of context. SNC-Lavalin has, in preparing any cost estimates, followed methodology and procedures, and exercised due care consistent with the intended level of accuracy, using its professional judgement and reasonable care, and is thus of the opinion that there is a high probability that actual costs will fall within the specified error margin. However, no warranty should be implied as to the accuracy of estimates. Unless expressly stated otherwise, assumptions, data and information supplied by, or gathered from other sources (including the Client, other consultants, testing laboratories and equipment suppliers etc.) upon which SNC-Lavalin’s opinion as set out herein is based has not been verified by SNC-Lavalin; SNC-Lavalin makes no representation as to its accuracy and disclaims all liability with respect thereto.
    [Show full text]
  • The Peak District Offers a World of Contrasting
    The Peak District offers a world of contrasting natural beauty, with moors and dales, rivers, springs and caverns and at its heart the Peak District National Park, known and loved by millions for its breath-taking landscapes, relaxation, inspiration and adventure. Spanning parts of Cheshire, Derbyshire, Staffordshire and Yorkshire in the heart of England, it?s home to dozens of market towns & pretty villages, historic houses, famous attractions and hundreds of traditional events. The Peak District is an area of great diversity, it is conventionally split into the northern Dark Peak, where most of the moorland is found and whose geology is gritstone, and the southern White Peak, where most of the population lives and where the geology is mainly limestone-based. Most of the area falls within the Peak District National Park, whose designation in 1951 made it the first national park in the United Kingdom. Proximity to the major cities of Manchester and Sheffield and the counties of Lancashire, Greater Manchester, Cheshire, Staffordshire and South and West Yorkshire, coupled with easy access by road and rail, have contributed to its popularity. The Peak District attracts an estimated 22 million visitors per year, making it the second most- visited national park in the world. Whether you are planning a day trip or an extended break The Peak District has something to interest all the family. Chesterfield is considered the gateway to the Peak District with local attractions such as The Church of St Mary and All Saints, Chesterfield, otherwise known as the crooked spire church, Hardwick Hall, Chesterfield Canal, Bolsover Castle, Chesterfield Museum and Art Gallery, Stainsby Mill, Sutton Scarsdale Hall, Proact Stadium, Tapton House, Renishaw Hall, Creswell Crags ? all within a couple of miles.
    [Show full text]
  • HS2 2016 Government Consultation on Route Refinement and Property
    HS2 2016 Government Consultation on Route Refinement and Property Response from Derbyshire County Council HS2 2016 Government Consultation on Route Refinement and Property Response from Derbyshire County Council This response has been prepared by Derbyshire County Council and its position on HS2 remains clear. The Council welcomes the economic benefits of the scheme but has consistently pressed HS2 to minimise the adverse effects on people’s homes and local communities – both during construction and after the line has opened – with any harmful effects reduced, mitigated or removed completely. In preparing this response, every effort has been made to reflect the views, where known, of the borough and district councils. The County Council would like to thank these councils and many other interest groups for contributing to this consultation response in addition to any separate individual responses they may wish to make. Acknowledgement Derbyshire County Council acknowledges the support and professional advice on this consultation response provided by AECOM as part of the Midlands Highway Alliance (MHA) partnership. The County Council is grateful for the advice and input from all those who have contributed to this document. March 2017 HS2 Consultation Response Derbyshire County Council TABLE OF 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 1 CONTENTS 1.1 County Council’s consultation response ...................... 1 1.2 Background ...................................................................... 1 1.3
    [Show full text]
  • Why Is the Water Quality in the River Doe Lea So Poor?”
    “Why is the water quality in the River Doe Lea so poor?” Dissertation submitted as part requirement for the Degree of Master of Science in Urban Water Engineering and Management By: Mark Stevens Supervisor: Prof. David Lerner The University of Sheffield Department of Civil & Structural Engineering September 2011 Declaration: Mark Stevens certifies that all the material contained within this document is his own work except where it is clearly referenced to others. _____________________ ii ABSTRACT: STEVENS, M. 2011. Why is the water quality in the River Doe Lea so poor? MSc Urban Water Engineering and Management Dissertation, Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Sheffield The Doe Lea River has a long history of pollution issues which once earned it the reputation of the most polluted river in Europe. Water quality has succumbed to the pressures of mining heritage, industry, agriculture, urban growth and major highways which dominate the catchment. The catchment has a poor chemical and biological classification status with the Environment Agency and ecological statues varies between poor and bad. Conditions of poor flow are often observed, which intensify water quality issues. In order to determine the reasons for the degradation of surface water quality, a project has been devised to take a snapshot of the water chemistry. Fifty water samples were collected simultaneously across the whole catchment and repeated for each season of the year. Analysis of these samples has developed understanding of pressures and influences that are contributing to water quality degradation. Via a mass balance analysis, it has been possible to locate particular areas of concern, determine sources and quantities of pollution and devise land management options to alleviate pollution stresses.
    [Show full text]