DOCSLIB.ORG

Windy Gap Firming Project Recreation Resources Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Windy Gap Firming Project Recreation Resources Technical Report Windy Gap Firming Project Recreation Resources Technical Report July 2008 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region Recreation Resources Technical Report Windy Gap Firming Project prepared for: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Eastern Area Office Loveland, Colorado prepared by: ERO Resources Corporation 1842 Clarkson Street Denver, Colorado 80218 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction.................................................................................................................1 2.0 Alternatives.................................................................................................................1 3.0 Study Area ..................................................................................................................2 4.0 Objectives ...................................................................................................................4 5.0 Methods.......................................................................................................................4 5.1. Data Sources and Analysis.................................................................................4 5.2. Assumptions.......................................................................................................5 6.0 Affected Environment.................................................................................................5 6.1. West Slope Recreation .......................................................................................5 6.1.1. Recreation at Existing Reservoirs..........................................................5 6.1.2. Three Lakes Recreation Activities and Uses .........................................7 6.1.3. Recreation at Potential New Reservoir Sites .........................................9 6.1.4. Colorado River Recreation ....................................................................9 6.2. East Slope Recreation ......................................................................................17 6.2.1. Recreation at Existing Reservoirs........................................................17 6.2.2. Recreation at Potential Reservoir Sites ................................................22 6.2.3. River Recreation ..................................................................................23 7.0 Environmental Consequences ...................................................................................26 7.1. Methods............................................................................................................26 7.1.1. Recreation Seasons ..............................................................................27 7.2. West Slope Reservoirs .....................................................................................27 7.2.1. Grand Lake and Shadow Mountain Reservoir .....................................27 7.2.2. Willow Creek Reservoir ......................................................................28 7.2.3. Granby Reservoir .................................................................................28 7.2.4. Potential New West Slope Reservoirs .................................................31 7.3. East Slope Reservoirs ......................................................................................31 7.3.1. Ralph Price Reservoir ..........................................................................31 7.3.2. Carter Lake...........................................................................................32 7.3.3. Horsetooth Reservoir ...........................................................................34 7.3.4. Potential New East Slope Reservoirs...................................................37 7.4. West Slope River Recreation...........................................................................38 7.4.1. Colorado River .....................................................................................38 7.4.2. Willow Creek .......................................................................................51 7.5. East Slope River Recreation ............................................................................51 7.5.1. Big Thompson River ............................................................................51 7.5.2. North St. Vrain Creek and St. Vrain Creek .........................................53 7.5.3. Other East Slope Streams.....................................................................54 i 8.0 Cumulative Effects....................................................................................................55 8.1. Methods............................................................................................................55 8.2. West Slope Reservoirs .....................................................................................55 8.2.1. Grand Lake and Shadow Mountain Reservoir .....................................55 8.2.2. Willow Creek Reservoir ......................................................................56 8.2.3. Granby Reservoir .................................................................................56 8.2.4. Potential New West Slope Reservoirs .................................................59 8.3. East Slope Reservoirs ......................................................................................59 8.3.1. Ralph Price Reservoir ..........................................................................59 8.3.2. Carter Lake...........................................................................................59 8.3.3. Potential New East Slope Reservoirs...................................................63 8.4. West Slope River Recreation...........................................................................64 8.4.1. Colorado River .....................................................................................64 8.4.2. Willow Creek .......................................................................................79 8.5. East Slope River Recreation ............................................................................80 8.5.1. Big Thompson River ............................................................................80 8.5.2. North St. Vrain Creek and St. Vrain Creek .........................................81 8.5.3. Other East Slope Streams.....................................................................82 9.0 References.................................................................................................................83 TABLES Table 1. Three Lakes Boating Facilities. ............................................................................7 Table 2. Boat Ramp Elevations at Three Lakes..................................................................7 Table 3. Campgrounds and Campsites at Three Lakes. ......................................................9 Table 4. Upper Colorado Campgrounds and Associated Recreation Facilities................13 Table 5. Colorado River Boating Flows for Gore Canyon and Pumphouse.....................15 Table 6. Total Annual Commercial Boating and Fishing Visitor Days (1999­ 2005) in the Pumphouse and Gore Canyon section of the Colorado River. ..............16 Table 7. Average Monthly Changes in Granby Reservoir Water Levels and Surface Area in Average Conditions. ........................................................................28 Table 8. Average Monthly Changes in Granby Reservoir Water Levels and Surface Area in Wet Years. .......................................................................................29 Table 9. Average Monthly Changes in Granby Reservoir Water Levels and Surface Area in Dry Years.........................................................................................29 Table 10. Average Monthly Changes in Carter Lake Elevation and Surface Area in Average Conditions. ..............................................................................................32 Table 11. Average Monthly Changes in Carter Lake Elevation and Surface Area in Wet Years. .............................................................................................................33 Table 12. Average Monthly Changes in Carter Lake Elevation and Surface Area in Dry Years...............................................................................................................33 Table 13. Average Monthly Changes in Horsetooth Reservoir Elevation and Surface Area in Average Conditions. ........................................................................34 ii Table 14. Average Monthly Changes in Horsetooth Reservoir Elevation and Surface Area in Wet Years. .......................................................................................35 Table 15. Average Monthly Changes in Horsetooth Reservoir Elevation and Surface Area in Dry Years.........................................................................................35 Table 16. Estimated Average Monthly Changes to Colorado River Flow above Windy Gap Reservoir in Average Conditions. ..........................................................38 Table 17. Estimated Average Monthly Changes to Colorado River Flow above Windy Gap Reservoir in Wet Years. .........................................................................39 Table 18. Estimated Average Monthly Changes to Colorado River Flow at Hot Sulphur Springs in Average Conditions. ...................................................................40 Table 19. Estimated Average Monthly Changes to Colorado River Flow at Hot Sulphur Springs in Wet Years....................................................................................40
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Locatable Mineral Reports for Colorado, South Dakota, and Wyoming provided to the U.S. Forest Service in Fiscal Years 1996 and 1997 by Anna B. Wilson Open File Report OF 97-535 1997 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. CONTENTS page INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 COLORADO ...................................................................... 2 Arapaho National Forest (administered by White River National Forest) Slate Creek .................................................................. 3 Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests Winter Park Properties (Raintree) ............................................... 15 Gunnison and White River National Forests Mountain Coal Company ...................................................... 17 Pike National Forest Land Use Resource Center .................................................... 28 Pike and San Isabel National Forests Shepard and Associates ....................................................... 36 Roosevelt National Forest Larry and Vi Carpenter ....................................................... 52 Routt National Forest Smith Rancho ............................................................... 55 San Juan National
    [Show full text]
  • NW RAC Minutes Aug. 23, 2012 Rio Blanco County Fairgrounds, Meeker, Colo
    NW RAC minutes Aug. 23, 2012 Rio Blanco County Fairgrounds, Meeker, Colo. Attendance: Category 1 Dave Grisso Tom Latham Wes McStay John Potter Absent: Steve Loshbaugh Category 2 Dan Davidson Pat Kennedy Dona Shue Steve Smith Terry Sweet Category 3 Jeff Comstock Dean Riggs Kai Turner Barbara Vasquez Lanny Weddle BLM: Jim Cagney, Kent Walter, Catherine Robertson, Steve Bennett, Susan Cassel, Wendy Reynolds, Dave Boyd, Kent Lyles, Chris Joyner, Jennifer Maiolo Public: Jon Hill, Rangley David Ludlam, West Slope Colorado Oil and Gas Association Ronald Daiz, Meeker Callie Hendrickson, White River and Douglas Creek Conservation Districts Stacy Gould, White River and Douglas Creek Conservation Districts Toni Moore, Colorado Wild Horse and Burro Coalition, The Cloud Foundation Brian Meinhart, Congressman Tipton’s office Jay Fletcher, Senator Udall’s office Steve Hinkemeyer, Trapper Mine Charles Bowman, Trapper Mine Kathleen Morrison, Fruita Rachel Geiger, Aurora Water Soren Jesperson, The Wilderness Society JoAnn Baxter, Craig Karol Bullen, Craig Patti Williams, Rangely 8 a.m. Pat Kennedy called to order quorum is present Jim Cagney recognized members with expiring terms: Dave Grisso Tom Latham Dona Shue Steve Smith Kai Turner Recreational Shooting Cagney: Recreational target shooting is emerging as an issue. Want to hear what the RAC has to say about if and when BLM should consider closing areas to target shooting. Cassel: Example of Kremmling RMP, where several specific areas were suggested for closures to target shooting due to conflicts with other uses. NRA sent out action alert to its members that whole office was going to be closed. Catherine: Looking at issues in Grand Junction Field Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter W-9 - Wildlife Properties
    07/15/2021 CHAPTER W-9 - WILDLIFE PROPERTIES Index Page ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS #900 REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL WILDLIFE 1 PROPERTIES, EXCEPT STATE TRUST LANDS ARTICLE II PROPERTY SPECIFIC PROVISIONS #901 PROPERTY SPECIFIC REGULATIONS 8 ARTICLE III STATE TRUST LANDS #902 REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL STATE TRUST LANDS 53 LEASED BY COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE #903 PROPERTY SPECIFIC REGULATIONS 55 ARTICLE IV STATE FISH UNITS #904 REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL STATE FISH UNITS 71 #905 PROPERTY SPECIFIC REGULATIONS 72 ARTICLE V BOATING RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL DIVISION CONTROLLED PROPERTIES, INCLUDING STATE TRUST LANDS LEASED BY COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE #906 AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES (ANS) 72 APPENDIX A 74 APPENDIX B 75 Basis and Purpose 81 Statement CHAPTER W-9 - WILDLIFE PROPERTIES ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS #900 - REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL WILDLIFE PROPERTIES, EXCEPT STATE TRUST LANDS A. DEFINITIONS 1. “Aircraft” means any machine or device capable of atmospheric flight, including, but not limited to, airplanes, helicopters, gliders, dirigibles, balloons, rockets, hang gliders and parachutes, and any models thereof. 2. "Water contact activities" means swimming, wading (except for the purpose of fishing), waterskiing, sail surfboarding, scuba diving, and other water-related activities which put a person in contact with the water (without regard to the clothing or equipment worn). 3. “Youth mentor hunting” means hunting by youths under 18 years of age. Youth hunters under 16 years of age shall at all times be accompanied by a mentor when hunting on youth mentor properties. A mentor must be 18 years of age or older and hold a valid hunter education certificate or be born before January 1, 1949.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    20_574310 bindex.qxd 1/28/05 12:00 AM Page 460 Index Arapahoe Basin, 68, 292 Auto racing A AA (American Automo- Arapaho National Forest, Colorado Springs, 175 bile Association), 54 286 Denver, 122 Accommodations, 27, 38–40 Arapaho National Fort Morgan, 237 best, 9–10 Recreation Area, 286 Pueblo, 437 Active sports and recre- Arapaho-Roosevelt National Avery House, 217 ational activities, 60–71 Forest and Pawnee Adams State College–Luther Grasslands, 220, 221, 224 E. Bean Museum, 429 Arcade Amusements, Inc., B aby Doe Tabor Museum, Adventure Golf, 111 172 318 Aerial sports (glider flying Argo Gold Mine, Mill, and Bachelor Historic Tour, 432 and soaring). See also Museum, 138 Bachelor-Syracuse Mine Ballooning A. R. Mitchell Memorial Tour, 403 Boulder, 205 Museum of Western Art, Backcountry ski tours, Colorado Springs, 173 443 Vail, 307 Durango, 374 Art Castings of Colorado, Backcountry yurt system, Airfares, 26–27, 32–33, 53 230 State Forest State Park, Air Force Academy Falcons, Art Center of Estes Park, 222–223 175 246 Backpacking. See Hiking Airlines, 31, 36, 52–53 Art on the Corner, 346 and backpacking Airport security, 32 Aspen, 321–334 Balcony House, 389 Alamosa, 3, 426–430 accommodations, Ballooning, 62, 117–118, Alamosa–Monte Vista 329–333 173, 204 National Wildlife museums, art centers, and Banana Fun Park, 346 Refuges, 430 historic sites, 327–329 Bandimere Speedway, 122 Alpine Slide music festivals, 328 Barr Lake, 66 Durango Mountain Resort, nightlife, 334 Barr Lake State Park, 374 restaurants, 333–334 118, 121 Winter Park, 286
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for Wayshowing: the Colorado River Headwaters Byway
    A Framework for Wayshowing: The Colorado River Headwaters Scenic & Historic Byway Eagle and Grand Counties Colorado June 2014 Acknowledgments This plan would not have been possible without the contributions of the Steering Committee of the Colorado River Headwaters Scenic & Historic Byway: Cherie Salberg, Dede Fay, Cathie Hook, Hannah Schechter, Dan Mathews, and Gaylene Orr Thanks to Board Members of the Grand Lake Chamber of Commerce who participated in the exit interview: Judy Burke, Ron Ellis, Marie Houston, Chery Hoese, Denise Dulack, Shawn Donevie, Kathy Walter-Smith, Paul Lewis, Christy Meyer, and to Yavonne Knox (Hot Sulfur Springs Chamber), and Diane Butler (Granby) Appreciation is also extended to the participants of the Wayfinding Assessment Team, who donated their time to spend a day behind the wheel. Thanks to Front Seaters: Kathy Moore and Joanna Duffey (first time visitors to the Colorado River Headwaters Scenic & Historic Byway) Back Seaters: Judy Walden (Tourism) and Bill Crawford (CO Department of Transportation). Special thanks to Lenore Bates, Scenic Byways Program Manager, Colorado Department of Transportation for her guidance throughout the project. The project was designed using concepts based on the work of David Dahlquist and the America’s Byways Resource Center. Document Produced By : Walden Mills Group Judy Walden, President Bobby Weidmann, Consultant June 2014 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail
    CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DAY & OVERNIGHT HIKES: COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail THE CENTENNIAL STATE The Colorado Rockies are the quintessential CDT experience! The CDT traverses 800 miles of these majestic and challenging peaks dotted with abandoned homesteads and ghost towns, and crosses the ancestral lands of the Ute, Eastern Shoshone, and Cheyenne peoples. The CDT winds through some of Colorado’s most incredible landscapes: the spectacular alpine tundra of the South San Juan, Weminuche, and La Garita Wildernesses where the CDT remains at or above 11,000 feet for nearly 70 miles; remnants of the late 1800’s ghost town of Hancock that served the Alpine Tunnel; the awe-inspiring Collegiate Peaks near Leadville, the highest incorporated city in America; geologic oddities like The Window, Knife Edge, and Devil’s Thumb; the towering 14,270 foot Grays Peak – the highest point on the CDT; Rocky Mountain National Park with its rugged snow-capped skyline; the remote Never Summer Wilderness; and the broad valleys and numerous glacial lakes and cirques of the Mount Zirkel Wilderness. You might also encounter moose, mountain goats, bighorn sheep, marmots, and pika on the CDT in Colorado. In this guide, you’ll find Colorado’s best day and overnight hikes on the CDT, organized south to north. ELEVATION: The average elevation of the CDT in Colorado is 10,978 ft, and all of the hikes listed in this guide begin at elevations above 8,000 ft. Remember to bring plenty of water, sun protection, and extra food, and know that a hike at elevation will likely be more challenging than the same distance hike at sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Primitive Areas Gore Range-Eagles Nest And
    OC1 LO STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS PRIMITIVE AREAS OHIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEt OCT 2 r iQ70 GORE RANGE-EAGLES NEST AND VICINITY, COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1319-C f* MINERAL RESOURCES of the GORE RANGE-EAGLES NEST PRIMITIVE AREA and VICINITY, COLORADO Crest of Gore Range and head of middle fork of Black Creek. View is westward. Mount Powell (alt 13,534 ft) is massive peak at right of cen­ ter. Eagles Nest Mountain is at far right. Duck Lake is in right foreground. Trough above right end of lake marks fault zone of north-northwest trend. Dark area on steep front of rock glacier at left in photograph is typical "wet front" suggesting ice core in rock glacier. Mineral Resources of the Gore Range-Eagles Nest Primitive Area and Vicinity, Summit and Eagle Counties, Colorado By OGDEN TWETO and BRUCE BRYANT, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, and by FRANK E. WILLIAMS, U.S. BUREAU OF MINES c STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS PRIMITIVE AREAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1319-C An evaluation of the mineral potential of the area UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. WASHINGTON : 1970 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 78-607129 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 ^. STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS PRIMITIVE AREAS The Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, Sept. 3, 1964) and the Conference Report on Senate bill 4, 88th Congress, direct the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to make mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Laramie River District, Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, R-2
    Laramie River District, Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, R-2. [1962?] Scale, ca. 1:63,360. No geographic coordinates. Public Land (Township & Range) grid. Black & white. 94 x 76 cm. Relief shown by hachures. Shows the Laramie River Ranger District of the Roosevelt National Forest along with national forest boundaries, roads, railroads, Forest Service administrative facilities, rivers, lakes, and streams. “Sixth Principal Meridian.” Holdings: Colorado State Univ. OCLC: 228071611 Poudre District, Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, R-2. [1962?] Scale, ca. 1:63,360. No geographic coordinates. Public Land (Township & Range) grid. Black & white. 76 x 128 cm. Relief shown by hachures. Shows the Poudre Ranger District of the Roosevelt National Forest along with national forest boundaries, roads, railroads, Forest Service administrative facilities, rivers, lakes, and streams. “Sixth Principal Meridian.” Holdings: Colorado State Univ. OCLC: 228073225 Redfeather District, Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, R-2. [1962?] Scale, ca. 1:63,360. No geographic coordinates. Public Land (Township & Range) grid. Black & white. 77 x 122 cm. Relief shown by hachures. Shows the Red Feather Ranger District of the Roosevelt National Forest along with national forest boundaries, roads, railroads, Forest Service administrative facilities, rivers, lakes, and streams. “Sixth Principal Meridian.” Holdings: Colorado State Univ. OCLC: 228073030 Boulder District, Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, R-2. 1968. Scale, ca. 1:63,360. No geographic coordinates. Public Land (Township & Range) grid. Black & white. 80 x 71 cm. Relief shown by hachures.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 OHV Grant Recommended Funding Approval
    State Trails Program 13787 US Hwy. 85 N., Littleton, Colorado 80125 P 303.791.1957 | F 303.470-0782 May 6-7, 2020 2020-2021 OHV Trail Grant funding awards as recommended by the State Recreational Trails Committee. This letter is a summary and explanation of the enclosed Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) 2020-2021 OHV Trail Grant funding recommendations for Parks and Wildlife Commission (PWC) approval during the May 2020 meeting. We are requesting approval for 60 grants for a total award amount of $4,273,860. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Colorado Parks and Wildlife Division’s (CPW) Trails Program, a statewide program within CPW, administers grants for trail-related projects on an annual basis. Local, county, and state governments, federal agencies, special recreation districts, and non-profit organizations with management responsibilities over public lands may apply for and are eligible to receive non- motorized and motorized trail grants. Colorado’s Off-highway Vehicle Trail Program CPW’s OHV Program is statutorily created in sections 33-14.5-101 through 33-14.5-113, Colorado Revised Statutes. The program is funded through the sale of OHV registrations and use permits. It is estimated that almost 200,000 OHVs were registered or permitted for use in Colorado during the 2019-2020 season. The price of an annual OHV registration or use- permit is $25.25. Funds are used to support the statewide OHV Program, the OHV Registration Program and OHV Trail Grant Program, including OHV law enforcement. The OHV Program seeks to improve and enhance motorized recreation opportunities in Colorado while promoting safe, responsible use of OHVs.
    [Show full text]
  • WATER USE Flow Regimes for In-Basin Water Users Are Reviewed
    Water Users and Recreation Appendix D WATER USE Flow regimes for in-basin water users are reviewed in this appendix. Water users include irrigators, municipalities and industry, and recreationalists. Flows include a wide range of parameters, affected by a wide range of uses and in some cases, such as recreation, may be somewhat subjective. The following sections include parameters, and approaches or methods to estimate these flow requirements. Much of the information presented herein was developed and presented in the Upper Colorado River Basin Study, Phase II, Final Report, May 29, (HRC 2003), herein referred to as the ‘UPCO Report’. WATER USE BY MUNICIPALITIES, INDUSTRY AND IRRIGATORS Water use as a parameter for this analysis and in terms of stream flow management focuses on two issues. The first is the physical limitations associated with stream flow that may affect the ability of a local water user to retrieve or use water. The second issue is the water user’s impact on flows in the stream relative to maintaining recommended flows. These issues are discussed in the following sections. Physical Limitations Irrigators: In general, most users are experiencing some difficulty in retrieving or using water, especially during the recent drought years. Many irrigators are constructing make-shift cobble dams to divert flows. In 2002 it was reported that the KB ditch was shut down voluntarily because the diversion was taking the majority of flows out of the Colorado River, leaving it in a dewatered condition. Pumping for irrigation is also limited by the available supply as well as by nuisance clogging from algae growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholders Finalize Management Plan for Upper Colorado River
    News Release BLM Colorado, Colorado River Valley Field Office, Kremmling Field Office U.S. Forest Service, White River National Forest July 20, 2020 Contacts: Roy Smith, Bureau of Land Management, (303) 239-3940 Kay Hopkins, White River National Forest (970) 945-3265 Stakeholders finalize management plan for Upper Colorado River GLENWOOD SPRINGS, Colo. – The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and U.S. Forest Service have formally accepted the final plan from a group of Upper Colorado River stakeholders that seeks to protect recreational fishing- and boating-related values along the Upper Colorado River from Gore Canyon to lower Glenwood Canyon. The Upper Colorado River Wild and Scenic Stakeholder Group Management Plan represents more than twelve years of work by 26 entities with diverse interests on the Upper Colorado River, from municipal water providers to recreationists. “This diverse group, with seemingly different views for managing the Upper Colorado River, rolled up their sleeves and developed a plan that balances protection of the river with flexibility for water users. The work of this group serves as a model for other flow management efforts across the state,” said White River National Forest Supervisor, Scott Fitzwilliams. “The final plan addresses an arena where federal agencies have very limited authority,” said Larry Sandoval, Colorado River Valley Field Office Manager. “When our federal land management authorities are combined with this cooperative flow management effort, all of the important natural and social values in the river corridor are proactively managed.” In 2008, the stakeholder group formed as the BLM was revising its land use plans to include studies that determined which stretches of the Colorado River had specific values that make them “eligible” for protection under the 1968 Wild and Scenic Rivers Act.
    [Show full text]