Containing Γ-Aminobutyric Acid Subtype a Receptors in Learning and Synaptic Plasticity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Containing Γ-Aminobutyric Acid Subtype a Receptors in Learning and Synaptic Plasticity THE REGULATORY PROPERTIES OF α5 SUBUNIT- CONTAINING γ-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID SUBTYPE A RECEPTORS IN LEARNING AND SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY by Loren John Martin A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Medical Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Loren Martin, 2009 The Regulatory Properties of α5 Containing γ-Aminobutyric Acid Subtype A Receptors in Learning and Synaptic Plasticity Loren Martin Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Medical Science University of Toronto 2009 Abstract Synaptic plasticity, which is thought to represent the neuronal substrate for learning and memory is influenced by the degree of GABAergic inhibitory tone. In particular, γ-aminobutyric acid subtype A receptors (GABAARs), which mediate the majority of inhibitory neurotransmission in the mammalian brain regulate learning and plasticity. In these studies I examined a subpopulation of α5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors (α5GABAARs), which are preferentially expressed in the hippocampus, to determine whether they have a specific role in memory processes. I hypothesized that α5GABAAR-activity constrains hippocampus-dependent learning and CA1 synaptic plasticity. The main research objective of this thesis was to investigate the electrophysiological changes within the hippocampus that accompany genetic and pharmacological targeting of α5GABAARs and how these changes impact behaviour. I found that the general anesthetic etomidate enhanced a tonic inhibitory conductance generated by α5GABAARs, and this action correlated with an impairment of long-term potentiation (LTP) and hippocampus-dependent memory performance for fear-associated memory and spatial navigation. Mice with a genetic deletion of the α5 subunit gene (Gabra5–/–) were resistant to the LTP- and memory-impairing effects of etomidate. Additionally, the LTP- and memory-impairing effects of etomidate were rescued by pharmacologically inhibiting α5GABAARs. Genetic and ii pharmacological inhibition of α5GABAARs enhanced associative learning in trace fear but not contextual fear conditioning tasks. Interestingly, genetic deletion and pharmacological inhibition of α5GABAARs did not result in the common adverse side-effects associated with non-selective inhibition of GABAARs such as anxiogenesis or seizures. Further, I found that blocking the tonic inhibition generated by α5GABAARs lowered the threshold for LTP, such that lower stimulation frequencies enhanced LTP. Synaptic changes within this frequency band were modified independently of phasic GABAAR inhibition. Inhibiting the α5GABAAR-dependent membrane conductance was associated with an increase in the depolarizing envelope during 10 Hz stimulation. These experiments provide new insights into the in vitro and in vivo physiology of α5GABAARs and suggest that a tonic inhibition generated by α5GABAARs constrains learning and glutamate plasticity through regulation of the membrane’s electrical properties. iii Acknowledgments I thank Dr. Beverley Orser for her continuous support and guidance over the last 5 years. Her infectious enthusiasm for science and unparalleled work ethic have truly been an inspiration. I also thank my thesis and examining committee members Drs. Mike Salter, John Roder, Zhengping Jia, Harold Atwood, Paul Frankland and Michael Fanselow (UCLA). Thanks also to Drs. John Macdonald and Mike Jackson for helpful discussions and technical contributions. I am grateful for the contributions of the Orser lab. I thank Ella Czerwinska, Rob Bonin, Agnieszka Zurek and Paul Whissell for making the lab a fun place in which to work. Their participation in theoretical discussions and grammatical corrections were greatly appreciated. A special acknowledgment must also go to those whose emotional support never wavered – my family. First my parents, Carol and Wayne for enduring my 11 year academic adventure, my sister Lori-Ann and my wife Marianne for her love, tolerance, understanding and help. List of Contributions Several investigators assisted with the experiments reported in this thesis. In Chapter 4, V.Y. Cheng assisted with the data collection for the Morris water maze, and the drug injections for the fear conditioning, rotarod and open field experiments. In Chapter 5, G.H. Oh assisted with the data collection for the Morris water maze, and drug injections for the fear conditioning experiments. In Chapter 6, Dr. William Ju contributed the Western Immunoblots for the glutamate receptors. In Appendix 1, R.P. Bonin completed the tonic inhibitory recordings in cultured hippocampal neurons. This work could not have been completed without the financial support provided to me by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Ontario Graduate Scholarship program. iv Table of Contents Abstract............................................................................................................................................ii Acknowledgments ..........................................................................................................................iv Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................v List of Figures.................................................................................................................................xi List of Abbreviations....................................................................................................................xiii Chapter 1. Thesis Structure ............................................................................................................1 1.1 General overview.................................................................................................................1 1.2 General hypothesis and thesis questions .............................................................................4 1.3 Thesis structure....................................................................................................................5 Chapter 2. General Introduction.....................................................................................................7 2.1 The hippocampus.................................................................................................................7 2.1.1 Gross structural overview........................................................................................7 2.1.2 Circuitry...................................................................................................................8 2.1.3 Laminar organization and neurotransmitter systems...............................................9 2.1.4 Learning, performance and hippocampus-dependent tasks...................................18 2.2 Modifications of synaptic connections..............................................................................23 2.2.1 Long-term potentiation: Properties and characteristics.........................................24 2.2.2 Long-term depression............................................................................................27 2.2.3 Bidirectional modification of synaptic plasticity ..................................................29 2.2.4 Role of GABA receptors in the induction of NMDA-dependent LTP..................33 2.3 GABA and GABAA receptor-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission..............................34 2.3.1 Synthesis and metabolism of GABA.....................................................................34 2.3.2 GABAA receptor-mediated hyperpolarization and shunting inhibition ................35 2.3.3 General overview of GABAA receptors ................................................................39 v 2.3.4 Location and physiological role of α5GABAAR subunits ....................................47 2.3.5 Pharmacology of α5GABAAR subunits................................................................54 2.3.6 α5GABAA receptors as a candidate target for the modification of hippocampus-dependent learning and synaptic plasticity .....................................57 2.3.7 A role for α5GABAARs in neurological disorders................................................63 2.4 Anesthesia..........................................................................................................................68 2.4.1 In vitro actions of general anesthetics ...................................................................69 2.4.2 Action of anesthetics on LTP and memory ...........................................................71 2.4.3 Problems associated with anesthetic-induced amnesia .........................................72 2.4.4 Intraoperative awareness and post-operative cognitive dysfunction.....................73 2.5 Summary............................................................................................................................75 Chapter 3. General Methods and Materials..................................................................................77 3.1 Experimental animals ........................................................................................................77 3.2 Electrophysiology..............................................................................................................78 3.2.1 Preparation of hippocampus tissue slices..............................................................78 3.2.2 Extracellular synaptic stimulation .........................................................................79 3.2.3 Extracellular field recordings ................................................................................79
Recommended publications
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0020892 A1 Thompson Et Al
    US 20170020892A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0020892 A1 Thompson et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jan. 26, 2017 (54) USE OF NEGATIVE MODULATORS OF Related U.S. Application Data GABA RECEPTORS CONTAINING ALPHAS SUBUNITS AS FAST ACTING (60) Provisional application No. 61/972,446, filed on Mar. ANTDEPRESSANTS 31, 2014. (71) Applicant: University of Maryland, Baltimore, Publication Classification Baltimore, MD (US) (51) Int. Cl. A 6LX 3/557 (2006.01) (72) Inventors: Scott Thompson, Baltimore, MD (US); A6II 3/53 (2006.01) Mark D. Kvarta, Ellicott City, MD A6II 45/06 (2006.01) (US); Adam Van Dyke, Baltimore, MD (52) U.S. Cl. (US) CPC ........... A61 K3I/55.17 (2013.01); A61K 45/06 (2013.01); A61 K3I/53 (2013.01) (73) Assignee: University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, MD (US) (57) ABSTRACT Embodiments of the disclosure include methods and com (21) Appl. No.: 15/300,984 positions related to treatment of one or more medical conditions with one or more negative modulators of GABA (22) PCT Filed: Mar. 31, 2015 receptors. In specific embodiments, depression and/or Sui cidability is treated or ameliorated or prevented with one or (86) PCT No.: PCT/US2O15/023667 more negative modulators of GABA receptors, such as a S 371 (c)(1), partial inverse agonist of a GABA receptor comprising an (2) Date: Sep. 30, 2016 alpha5 subunit. Patent Application Publication Jan. 26, 2017. Sheet 1 of 12 US 2017/002O892 A1 ×1/ /|\ Patent Application Publication Jan. 26, 2017. Sheet 3 of 12 US 2017/002O892 A1 & Patent Application Publication Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Differences in a Transgenic Rat Model of Huntington's Disease
    Human Molecular Genetics, 2008, Vol. 17, No. 17 2595–2609 doi:10.1093/hmg/ddn159 Advance Access published on May 23, 2008 Sex differences in a transgenic rat model of Huntington’s disease: decreased 17b-estradiol levels correlate with reduced numbers of DARPP321 neurons in males 1,{ 1,{ 1 1 2 Felix J. Bode , Michael Stephan , Hendrik Suhling , Reinhard Pabst , Rainer H. Straub , Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/hmg/article-abstract/17/17/2595/632381 by guest on 27 June 2020 Kerstin A. Raber3, Michael Bonin4, Huu Phuc Nguyen4, Olaf Riess4, Andreas Bauer5,6, Charlotte Sjoberg7,A˚ sa Peterse´n7 and Stephan von Ho¨ rsten1,3,Ã 1Institute of Functional and Applied Anatomy, Medical School of Hannover, 30625 Hannover, Germany, 2Department of Internal Medicine I, University Regensburg, 93042 Regensburg, Germany, 3Experimental Therapy, Franz-Penzoldt- Center, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nu¨rnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany, 4Department of Medical Genetics, University of Tu¨bingen, 72076 Tu¨bingen, Germany, 5Institute of Neurosciences and Biophysics, Research Centre Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany, 6Department of Neurology, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, 40001 Duesseldorf, Germany and 7Translational Neuroendocrine Research Unit, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, 22184 Lund, Sweden Received March 10, 2008; Revised May 8, 2008; Accepted May 21, 2008 Recent clinical studies have highlighted that female sex hormones represent potential neuroprotective mediators against damage caused by acute and chronic brain diseases. This evidence has been confirmed by experimental studies documenting the protective role of female sex hormones both in vitro and in vivo, although these studies did not specifically focus on Huntington’s disease (HD).
    [Show full text]
  • Cognition and Steroidogenesis in the Rhesus Macaque
    Cognition and Steroidogenesis in the Rhesus Macaque Krystina G Sorwell A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Behavioral Neuroscience and the Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2013 School of Medicine Oregon Health & Science University CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL This is to certify that the PhD dissertation of Krystina Gerette Sorwell has been approved Henryk Urbanski Mentor/Advisor Steven Kohama Member Kathleen Grant Member Cynthia Bethea Member Deb Finn Member 1 For Lily 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Figures and Tables ............................................................................................................................................. 7 List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................................... 10 Abstract........................................................................................................................................................................ 13 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 15 Part A: Central steroidogenesis and cognition ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GABA Receptors
    D Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews Review No.7 / 1-2011 GABA receptors Wolfgang Froestl , CNS & Chemistry Expert, AC Immune SA, PSE Building B - EPFL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Phone: +41 21 693 91 43, FAX: +41 21 693 91 20, E-mail: [email protected] GABA Activation of the GABA A receptor leads to an influx of chloride GABA ( -aminobutyric acid; Figure 1) is the most important and ions and to a hyperpolarization of the membrane. 16 subunits with γ most abundant inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian molecular weights between 50 and 65 kD have been identified brain 1,2 , where it was first discovered in 1950 3-5 . It is a small achiral so far, 6 subunits, 3 subunits, 3 subunits, and the , , α β γ δ ε θ molecule with molecular weight of 103 g/mol and high water solu - and subunits 8,9 . π bility. At 25°C one gram of water can dissolve 1.3 grams of GABA. 2 Such a hydrophilic molecule (log P = -2.13, PSA = 63.3 Å ) cannot In the meantime all GABA A receptor binding sites have been eluci - cross the blood brain barrier. It is produced in the brain by decarb- dated in great detail. The GABA site is located at the interface oxylation of L-glutamic acid by the enzyme glutamic acid decarb- between and subunits. Benzodiazepines interact with subunit α β oxylase (GAD, EC 4.1.1.15). It is a neutral amino acid with pK = combinations ( ) ( ) , which is the most abundant combi - 1 α1 2 β2 2 γ2 4.23 and pK = 10.43.
    [Show full text]
  • Α5gabaa Receptor Activity Sets the Threshold for Long-Term Potentiation and Constrains Hippocampus-Dependent Memory
    The Journal of Neuroscience, April 14, 2010 • 30(15):5269–5282 • 5269 Cellular/Molecular ␣ 5GABAA Receptor Activity Sets the Threshold for Long-Term Potentiation and Constrains Hippocampus-Dependent Memory Loren J. Martin,1 Agnieszka A. Zurek,2 John F. MacDonald,2 John C. Roder,3 Michael F. Jackson,2 and Beverley A. Orser1,2,4 1Institute of Medical Science and 2Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada, 3Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada, and 4Department of Anesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada Synaptic plasticity, which is the neuronal substrate for many forms of hippocampus-dependent learning, is attenuated by GABA type A receptor (GABAAR)-mediated inhibition. The prevailing notion is that a synaptic or phasic form of GABAergic inhibition regulates synaptic plasticity; however, little is known about the role of GABAAR subtypes that generate a tonic or persistent inhibitory conductance. ␣ ␣ We studied the regulation of synaptic plasticity by 5 subunit-containing GABAARs ( 5GABAARs), which generate a tonic inhibitory conductance in CA1 pyramidal neurons using electrophysiological recordings of field and whole-cell potentials in hippocampal slices ؊/؊ ␣ from both wild-type and null mutant mice for the 5 subunit of the GABAAR(Gabra5 mice). In addition, the strength of fear- ␣ associated memory was studied. The results showed that 5GABAAR activity raises the threshold for induction of long-term potentiation in a highly specific band of stimulation frequencies (10–20 Hz) through mechanisms that are predominantly independent of inhibitory ␣ synaptic transmission. The deletion or pharmacological inhibition of 5GABAARs caused no change in baseline membrane potential or inputresistancebutincreaseddepolarizationduring10Hzstimulation.Theencodingofhippocampus-dependentmemorywasregulated ␣ by 5GABAARs but only under specific conditions that generate moderate but not robust forms of fear-associated learning.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW ARTICLE the Genetics of Autism
    REVIEW ARTICLE The Genetics of Autism Rebecca Muhle, BA*; Stephanie V. Trentacoste, BA*; and Isabelle Rapin, MD‡ ABSTRACT. Autism is a complex, behaviorally de- tribution of a few well characterized X-linked disorders, fined, static disorder of the immature brain that is of male-to-male transmission in a number of families rules great concern to the practicing pediatrician because of an out X-linkage as the prevailing mode of inheritance. The astonishing 556% reported increase in pediatric preva- recurrence rate in siblings of affected children is ϳ2% to lence between 1991 and 1997, to a prevalence higher than 8%, much higher than the prevalence rate in the general that of spina bifida, cancer, or Down syndrome. This population but much lower than in single-gene diseases. jump is probably attributable to heightened awareness Twin studies reported 60% concordance for classic au- and changing diagnostic criteria rather than to new en- tism in monozygotic (MZ) twins versus 0 in dizygotic vironmental influences. Autism is not a disease but a (DZ) twins, the higher MZ concordance attesting to ge- syndrome with multiple nongenetic and genetic causes. netic inheritance as the predominant causative agent. By autism (the autistic spectrum disorders [ASDs]), we Reevaluation for a broader autistic phenotype that in- mean the wide spectrum of developmental disorders cluded communication and social disorders increased characterized by impairments in 3 behavioral domains: 1) concordance remarkably from 60% to 92% in MZ twins social interaction; 2) language, communication, and and from 0% to 10% in DZ pairs. This suggests that imaginative play; and 3) range of interests and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Dendritic Inhibition and Impaired NMDAR Activation in a Mouse Model of Down Syndrome
    This Accepted Manuscript has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. Research Articles: Neurobiology of Disease Enhanced dendritic inhibition and impaired NMDAR activation in a mouse model of Down syndrome Jan M. Schulz1, Frederic Knoflach2, Maria-Clemencia Hernandez2 and Josef Bischofberger1 1Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Pestalozzistr. 20, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland 2Pharma Research and Early Development, Discovery Neuroscience Department, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2723-18.2019 Received: 22 October 2018 Revised: 9 April 2019 Accepted: 10 April 2019 Published: 18 April 2019 Author contributions: J.M.S., M.C.H., and J.B. designed research; J.M.S. and F.K. performed research; J.M.S. analyzed data; J.M.S. and J.B. wrote the first draft of the paper; J.M.S. and J.B. wrote the paper; F.K., M.C.H., and J.B. edited the paper. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing financial interests. We would like to thank Tom Otis for helpful comments on the manuscript. We thank Selma Becherer and Martine Schwager for mouse genotyping, histochemical stainings and technical assistance, Marie-Claire Pflimlin for some electrophysiological recordings and Andrew Thomas for RO4938581 supply. This work was supported by a Roche Postdoctoral Fellowship and by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF, Project 31003A_176321). The authors declare no competing financial interests. Correspondence: Dr. Josef Bischofberger, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Pestalozzistr. 20, CH-4046 Basel, Switzerland, Phone: +41-61-2672729, E-mail: [email protected] Cite as: J.
    [Show full text]
  • Ion Channels
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: Ion channels. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1442g5hg Journal British journal of pharmacology, 176 Suppl 1(S1) ISSN 0007-1188 Authors Alexander, Stephen PH Mathie, Alistair Peters, John A et al. Publication Date 2019-12-01 DOI 10.1111/bph.14749 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: Ion channels. British Journal of Pharmacology (2019) 176, S142–S228 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: Ion channels Stephen PH Alexander1 , Alistair Mathie2 ,JohnAPeters3 , Emma L Veale2 , Jörg Striessnig4 , Eamonn Kelly5, Jane F Armstrong6 , Elena Faccenda6 ,SimonDHarding6 ,AdamJPawson6 , Joanna L Sharman6 , Christopher Southan6 , Jamie A Davies6 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK 2Medway School of Pharmacy, The Universities of Greenwich and Kent at Medway, Anson Building, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK 3Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK 4Pharmacology and Toxicology, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria 5School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK 6Centre for Discovery Brain Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20 is the fourth in this series of biennial publications. The Concise Guide provides concise overviews of the key properties of nearly 1800 human drug targets with an emphasis on selective pharmacology (where available), plus links to the open access knowledgebase source of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties.
    [Show full text]
  • NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Epigenetics
    NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Epigenetics. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 June 23. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Epigenetics. 2007 ; 2(2): 126±134. Epigenetics and Neural Developmental Disorders: Washington DC, September 18 and 19, 2006 Xinyu Zhao1,*, ChangHui Pak2, Richard D. Smrt1, and Peng Jin2,* 1 Department of Neuroscience; University of New Mexico School of Medicine; Albuquerque, New Mexico USA 2 Department of Human Genetics; Emory University School of Medicine; Atlanta, Georgia USA Abstract Neural developmental disorders, such as autism, Rett Syndrome, Fragile X syndrome, and Angelman syndrome manifest during early postnatal neural development. Although the genes responsible for some of these disorders have been identified, how the mutations of these genes affect neural development is currently unclear. Emerging evidence suggest that these disorders share common underlying defects in neuronal morphology, synaptic connectivity and brain plasticity. In particular, alterations in dendritic branching and spine morphology play a central role in the pathophysiology of most mental retardation disorders, suggesting that common pathways regulating neuronal function may be affected. Epigenetic modulations, mediated by DNA methylation, RNA-associated silencing, and histone modification, can serve as an intermediate process that imprints dynamic environmental experiences on the “fixed” genome, resulting in stable alterations in phenotypes. Disturbance in epigenetic regulations can lead to inappropriate expression or silencing of genes, causing an array of multi-system disorders and neoplasias. Rett syndrome, the most common form of mental retardation in young girls, is due to l mutation of MECP2, encoding a methylated DNA binding protein that translates DNA methylation into gene repression.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article
    Acta Veterinaria-Beograd 2014, 64 (1), 52-60 UDK: 615.214.32:612.825 DOI: 10.2478/acve-2014-0006 Research article ANTIDEPRESSANT EFFECTS OF AN INVERSE AGONIST SELECTIVE FOR α5 GABA-A RECEPTORS IN THE RAT FORCED SWIM TEST SAMARDŽIĆ Janko1*, PUŠKAŠ Laslo2, OBRADOVIĆ Miljana3, LAZIĆ-PUŠKAŠ Dijana4, OBRADOVIĆ I Dragan1 1Institute of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotića 1, Belgrade, Serbia; 2Institute of Anatomy “Niko Miljanić”, Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotića 4, Belgrade, Serbia; 3Institute of Histology and Embriology, Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Višegradska 26, Belgrade, Serbia; 4Clinic for Psychiatric Diseases “Dr Laza Lazarevic”, Belgrade, Serbia and Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Belgrade, Visokog Stevana 5, Belgrade, Serbia (Received 24 December 2013; Accepted 28 January 2014) It has been shown in electrophysiological studies that the ligand L-655,708 possesses a binding selectivity and a moderate inverse agonist functional selectivity for α5-containing GABA-A receptors. The present study is aimed to investigate the antidepressant effects of the ligand L-655,708 in the forced swim test (FST) and its impact on locomotor activity in rats. The behavior of the animals was recorded with a digital camera, and the data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s test. In FST, L-655,708 signifi cantly decreased immobility time at a dose of 3 mg/kg after a single and repeated administration (p<0.05), exerting acute and chronic antidepressant effects. However, it did not induce signifi cant differences in the time of struggling behavior during FST.
    [Show full text]
  • Decreasing the Expression of GABAA Α5-Subunit- Containing Receptors
    Verónica Vidal 1, Susana García-Cerro 2, Paula Martínez 1, Andrea Corrales 1, Sara Lantigua 1, Rebeca Vidal 1,3,4 , Noemí Rueda 1, Laurence Ozmen 5, Maria-Clemencia Hernández 5, Carmen Martínez-Cué 1* Decreasing the expression of GABA A α5-subunit- containing receptors partially improves cognitive, electrophysiological and morphological hippocampal defects in the Ts65Dn model of Down syndrome 1 Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. 2 Universitat de Barcelona, Departamento de Fundamentos Clínicos, Unidad de Farmacología, Barcelona, Spain. 3 Instituto de Biomedicina y Biotecnología de Cantabria, IBBTEC (Universidad de Cantabria, CSIC, SODERCAN), Santander, Spain. 4 Centro de Investigacion Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain. 5 Pharma Research and Early Development, Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland. * corresponding author: email: [email protected] Telephone number: +34 942203935 Keywords GABA A; α5 subunit; Down syndrome; over-inhibition; Ts65Dn mice; cognition Acknowledgments This work was supported by the Jérôme Lejeune Foundation, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (PSI2016-76194-R/ AEI/FEDER/UE). 1 ABSTRACT Trisomy 21 or Down syndrome (DS) is the most common cause of intellectual disability of a genetic origin. The Ts65Dn (TS) mouse, which is the most commonly used and best-characterized mouse model of DS, displays many of the cognitive, neuromorphological and biochemical anomalies that are found in the human condition. One of the mechanisms that has been proposed to be responsible for the cognitive deficits in this mouse model is impaired GABA- mediated inhibition.
    [Show full text]
  • Distinct Diagnostic and Prognostic Values of Γ‑Aminobutyric Acid Type a Receptor Family Genes in Patients with Colon Adenocarcinoma
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS 20: 275-291, 2020 Distinct diagnostic and prognostic values of γ‑aminobutyric acid type A receptor family genes in patients with colon adenocarcinoma LING YAN1, YI‑ZHEN GONG1, MENG‑NAN SHAO2, GUO‑TIAN RUAN1, HAI‑LUN XIE1, XI‑WEN LIAO3, XIANG‑KUN WANG3, QUAN‑FA HAN3, XIN ZHOU3, LI‑CHENG ZHU4, FENG GAO1 and JIA‑LIANG GAN1 1Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University; 2Life Sciences Institute, Guangxi Medical University; 3Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University; 4Department of Immunology, School of Preclinical Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 530021, P.R. China Received July 11, 2019; Accepted February 7, 2020 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.11573 Abstract. In the present study, the significance of GABAA of cell matrix adhesion, integrin binding, angiogenesis, endo- genes in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) were investigated thelial growth factor and endothelial migration regulation in from the view of diagnosis and prognosis. All data were patients with COAD with GABRD overexpression. GABRB1, achieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Overall survival GABRD, GABRP and GABRQ were associated with the was analyzed by the Kaplan‑Meier analyses and Cox prognostic factors of COAD. The expression levels of regression model and the hazard ratios and 95% confidence GABRA2, GABRA3, GABRB2, GABRB3, GABRG2, GABRD interval were calculated for computation. The Database for and GABRE may allow differentiation between tumor tissues Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery, and the and adjacent normal tissues. Biological Networks Gene Ontology (BiNGO) softwares were applied to assess the biological processes and Kyoto Introduction Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) was used for pathway analysis to predict the biological function of GABAA Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a type of malignant tumor origi- genes.
    [Show full text]