DOCSLIB.ORG

Divisibility of Natural Numbers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Divisibility of Natural Numbers 10-19-2009 Divisibility of Natural Numbers We now return to our discussion of the natural numbers. We have built up much of the mathematical foundation for the natural numbers (N = 1; 2; 3; :::). We used set theory to come up with rigorous definition for natural numbers. We defined four standard operations on natural numbers (+; −×; ÷). We have described in much detail various conceptual models for the natural numbers and observed how these numbers are a \natu- ral' and foundational component of quantitative thinking. Now we will investigate these numbers on a deeper and more sophisticated level. The goal of this investigation is to build up the intellectual structure necessary to establish the existence and properties of more complex mathematical number systems, particularly the rational (fractions) and real numbers. Our most powerful tools in this section will turn out to be inductive and deductive reasoning. Divisibility. For any whole numbers a and b we know (by say, the repeated subtraction or division algorithm) that there are unique whole numbers q and r so that a = b · q + r where 0 ≤ r < b. Here q is called the quotient and r is called the remainder. For example, consider the problem 14 ÷ 3 = 4 R2. We can write 14 = 3 · 4 + 2: When the remainder is r = 0 in such a representation we say that b divides a. That is, if there is a unique whole number q so that a = bq then b divides a. Or in other words, we say that b divides a when b divides into a with no remainder. Warning: Never write a ÷ b when you mean to say \a divides b". To say \a divides b" you must always write out the words. Example. 7 divides 35, 25 divides 100, 341 divides 0. 8 does not divide 21, 10 does not divide 51. Example. A number a is even if 2 divides a. A number a is odd if 2 does not divide a. So we know that if a is an even whole number that a = 2 · n for some other whole number n. Also, suppose a is odd. Then a = 2n + r for some n and some 0 < r < 2. So the remainder must be 1. From this we may conclude that every odd number can be written as a = 2n + 1: We have already seen this idea before in the pattern recognition section. From now on, if we want to prove something is even or odd we will use these characterizations. Factors. If b divides a, then b is sometimes called factor or divisor of a and a is called a multiple of b. Example. Find the divisors of 8. Is 32 a multiple of 8? By guess and check, the divisors of 8 are 1,2,4,8. 32 is a multiple of 8 since 8 divides 32. Prime. A number is called prime if its only factors are 1 and itself. Composite A number is called composite if it is not prime, that is if it has more than two distinct factors. As a technical point, we do not consider the number 1, prime or composite. Prime numbers are of special importance because they are the basic building block of all numbers. Indeed, any natural number (other than 1) can be written as the product of prime numbers. For example 180 = 18 · 10 = 3 · 6 · 2 · 5 = 3 · 2 · 3 · 2 · 5 = 22 · 32 · 5: We summarize this idea in a simple but important theorem. Theorem 1. Every natural number greater than 1 is a power of a prime or can be expressed as a product of powers of primes. This factorization is unique, apart from the ordering. That is, If we ignore the order in which we write the prime factors there is only one prime factorization of every natural number. If we know the prime factorization of a number we can make an orderly list of its q1 q2 qk divisors. (See page 235-236 for two examples). To see why, suppose that a = p1 ·p2 ··· pk . If b divides a, we know that q1 q2 qk p1 · p2 ··· pk = a = b · q: This says that b must be some combination of powers of p1; p2; :::; pk and that q must be all the factors which don't appear in a. To list the divisors, we make a list of all the possible ways to write products of powers of p1; p2; :::; pk so that the product is less than or equal to a. Since primes are very important numbers, two questions quickly arise in our study of them: 1. How many primes are there? 2. How do we know that a number is prime? It turns out that there are infinitely many prime numbers. Proof. The first prime number is 2. The second prime number is 3. Consider the number 2 · 3 + 1 = 7. Since by the division algorithm, there is only one way to write 7 = 2 · q1 + r1 and 7 = 3 · q2 + r2, we discover that the number 7 is not divisible by 2 or by 3. Since every number larger than 1 has a prime factorization, there must be a prime number other than 3 which divides into 7. In fact, this number happens to be 7. Now, we build the number 2 · 3 · 7 + 1 = 43. Using the division algorithm, we can see that none of 2,3, or 7 divides 43. So there must be a new prime other than 7 which divides 43. This number happens to be 43. We continue and build the number 2 · 3 · 7 · 43 + 1 = 1807. Again, this number is not divisible by 2,3,7, or 43. So there must be a new prime other than 43 which divides 1807. In this case, we could use either the prime 13 or 139. We continue and write 2 · 3 · 7 · 13 · 43 + 1... The idea is that we can keep doing this process forever and at each step get a new prime number. So there must be an infinite number of primes. To determine if a number is prime the following theorem is very helpful. Theorem 2. If n is a composite number, then there is a prime p such that p divides n p and p ≤ n. Proof. Since n is composite we can write n = a · b where we assume that a is the smaller factor (that is a ≤ b). Now since a ≤ b multiplying by a we get a2 ≤ ab = n So p a ≤ n: Now a is a whole number bigger than 1, and so has a prime factorization. If p is a prime in this factorization then p ≤ a is a divisor of a and it is also a divisor of b. p So there is a prime p ≤ n which divides n. p Consequently, by the rule of indirect reasoning, if there is no prime p ≤ n which divides n then n is prime. (Why?) For examples of using this theorem, see 237-239..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 81684-1B SP.Pdf
    INTERMEDIATE ALGEBRA The Why and the How First Edition Mathew Baxter Florida Gulf Coast University Bassim Hamadeh, CEO and Publisher Jess Estrella, Senior Graphic Designer Jennifer McCarthy, Acquisitions Editor Gem Rabanera, Project Editor Abbey Hastings, Associate Production Editor Chris Snipes, Interior Designer Natalie Piccotti, Senior Marketing Manager Kassie Graves, Director of Acquisitions Jamie Giganti, Senior Managing Editor Copyright © 2018 by Cognella, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information retrieval system without the written permission of Cognella, Inc. For inquiries regarding permissions, translations, foreign rights, audio rights, and any other forms of reproduction, please contact the Cognella Licensing Department at [email protected]. Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. Cover image copyright © Depositphotos/agsandrew. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-5165-0303-2 (pbk) / 978-1-5165-0304-9 (br) iii |  CONTENTS 1 The Real Number System 1 RealNumbersandTheirProperties 2:1.1 RealNumbers 2 PropertiesofRealNumbers 6 Section1.1Exercises 9 TheFourBasicOperations 11:1.2 AdditionandSubtraction 11 MultiplicationandDivision
    [Show full text]
  • The Unique Natural Number Set and Distributed Prime Numbers
    mp Co uta & tio d n e a li Jabur and Kushnaw, J Appl Computat Math 2017, 6:4 l p M p a Journal of A t h DOI: 10.4172/2168-9679.1000368 f e o m l a a n t r ISSN: 2168-9679i c u s o J Applied & Computational Mathematics Research Article Open Access The Unique Natural Number Set and Distributed Prime Numbers Alabed TH1* and Bashir MB2 1Computer Science, Shendi University, Shendi, Sudan 2Shendi University, Shendi, Sudan Abstract The Natural number set has a new number set behind three main subset: odd, even and prime which are unique number set. It comes from a mathematical relationship between the two main types even and odd number set. It consists of prime and T-semi-prime numbers set. However, finding ways to understand how prime number was distributed was ambiguity and it is impossible, this new natural set show how the prime number was distributed and highlight focusing on T-semi-prime number as a new sub natural set. Keywords: Prime number; T-semi-prime number; Unique number purely mathematical sciences and it has been used prime number set within theoretical physics to try and produce a theory that ties together prime numbers with quantum chaos theory [3]. However, researchers Introduction were made a big effort to find algorithm which can describe how prime The Unique natural number set is sub natural number set which number are distributed, still distribution of prime numbers throughout consist of prime and T-semi-prime numbers. T-semi-prime is natural a list of integers leads to the emergence of many unanswered and number divided by one or more prime numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • New Formulas for Semi-Primes. Testing, Counting and Identification
    New Formulas for Semi-Primes. Testing, Counting and Identification of the nth and next Semi-Primes Issam Kaddouraa, Samih Abdul-Nabib, Khadija Al-Akhrassa aDepartment of Mathematics, school of arts and sciences bDepartment of computers and communications engineering, Lebanese International University, Beirut, Lebanon Abstract In this paper we give a new semiprimality test and we construct a new formula for π(2)(N), the function that counts the number of semiprimes not exceeding a given number N. We also present new formulas to identify the nth semiprime and the next semiprime to a given number. The new formulas are based on the knowledge of the primes less than or equal to the cube roots 3 of N : P , P ....P 3 √N. 1 2 π( √N) ≤ Keywords: prime, semiprime, nth semiprime, next semiprime 1. Introduction Securing data remains a concern for every individual and every organiza- tion on the globe. In telecommunication, cryptography is one of the studies that permits the secure transfer of information [1] over the Internet. Prime numbers have special properties that make them of fundamental importance in cryptography. The core of the Internet security is based on protocols, such arXiv:1608.05405v1 [math.NT] 17 Aug 2016 as SSL and TSL [2] released in 1994 and persist as the basis for securing dif- ferent aspects of today’s Internet [3]. The Rivest-Shamir-Adleman encryption method [4], released in 1978, uses asymmetric keys for exchanging data. A secret key Sk and a public key Pk are generated by the recipient with the following property: A message enciphered Email addresses: [email protected] (Issam Kaddoura), [email protected] (Samih Abdul-Nabi) 1 by Pk can only be deciphered by Sk and vice versa.
    [Show full text]
  • A NEW LARGEST SMITH NUMBER Patrick Costello Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY 40475 (Submitted September 2000)
    A NEW LARGEST SMITH NUMBER Patrick Costello Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY 40475 (Submitted September 2000) 1. INTRODUCTION In 1982, Albert Wilansky, a mathematics professor at Lehigh University wrote a short article in the Two-Year College Mathematics Journal [6]. In that article he identified a new subset of the composite numbers. He defined a Smith number to be a composite number where the sum of the digits in its prime factorization is equal to the digit sum of the number. The set was named in honor of Wi!anskyJs brother-in-law, Dr. Harold Smith, whose telephone number 493-7775 when written as a single number 4,937,775 possessed this interesting characteristic. Adding the digits in the number and the digits of its prime factors 3, 5, 5 and 65,837 resulted in identical sums of42. Wilansky provided two other examples of numbers with this characteristic: 9,985 and 6,036. Since that time, many things have been discovered about Smith numbers including the fact that there are infinitely many Smith numbers [4]. The largest Smith numbers were produced by Samuel Yates. Using a large repunit and large palindromic prime, Yates was able to produce Smith numbers having ten million digits and thirteen million digits. Using the same large repunit and a new large palindromic prime, the author is able to find a Smith number with over thirty-two million digits. 2. NOTATIONS AND BASIC FACTS For any positive integer w, we let S(ri) denote the sum of the digits of n.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Tables of Fermat Numbers and Their Prime Factors
    Appendix A Tables of Fermat Numbers and Their Prime Factors The problem of distinguishing prime numbers from composite numbers and of resolving the latter into their prime factors is known to be one of the most important and useful in arithmetic. Carl Friedrich Gauss Disquisitiones arithmeticae, Sec. 329 Fermat Numbers Fo =3, FI =5, F2 =17, F3 =257, F4 =65537, F5 =4294967297, F6 =18446744073709551617, F7 =340282366920938463463374607431768211457, Fs =115792089237316195423570985008687907853 269984665640564039457584007913129639937, Fg =134078079299425970995740249982058461274 793658205923933777235614437217640300735 469768018742981669034276900318581864860 50853753882811946569946433649006084097, FlO =179769313486231590772930519078902473361 797697894230657273430081157732675805500 963132708477322407536021120113879871393 357658789768814416622492847430639474124 377767893424865485276302219601246094119 453082952085005768838150682342462881473 913110540827237163350510684586298239947 245938479716304835356329624224137217. The only known Fermat primes are Fo, ... , F4 • 208 17 lectures on Fermat numbers Completely Factored Composite Fermat Numbers m prime factor year discoverer 5 641 1732 Euler 5 6700417 1732 Euler 6 274177 1855 Clausen 6 67280421310721* 1855 Clausen 7 59649589127497217 1970 Morrison, Brillhart 7 5704689200685129054721 1970 Morrison, Brillhart 8 1238926361552897 1980 Brent, Pollard 8 p**62 1980 Brent, Pollard 9 2424833 1903 Western 9 P49 1990 Lenstra, Lenstra, Jr., Manasse, Pollard 9 p***99 1990 Lenstra, Lenstra, Jr., Manasse, Pollard
    [Show full text]
  • William D. Banks Department of Mathematics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri [email protected]
    #A3 INTEGERS 16 (2016) EVERY NATURAL NUMBER IS THE SUM OF FORTY-NINE PALINDROMES William D. Banks Department of Mathematics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri [email protected] Received: 9/4/15, Accepted: 1/4/16, Published: 1/21/16 Abstract It is shown that the set of decimal palindromes is an additive basis for the natural numbers. Specifically, we prove that every natural number can be expressed as the sum of forty-nine (possibly zero) decimal palindromes. 1. Statement of Result Let N .= 0, 1, 2, . denote the set of natural numbers (including zero). Every { } number n N has a unique decimal representation of the form 2 L 1 − j n = 10 δj, (1) j=0 X where each δj belongs to the digit set .= 0, 1, 2, . , 9 , D { } and the leading digit δL 1 is nonzero whenever L 2. In what follows, we use − ≥ diagrams to illustrate the ideas; for example, n = δL 1 δ1 δ0 − · · · represents the relation (1). The integer n is said to be a decimal palindrome if its decimal digits satisfy the symmetry condition δj = δL 1 j (0 j < L). − − Denoting by the collection of all decimal palindromes in N, the aim of this note P is to show that is an additive basis for N. P INTEGERS: 16 (2016) 2 Theorem 1. The set of decimal palindromes is an additive basis for the natural P numbers N. Every natural number is the sum of forty-nine (possibly zero) decimal palindromes. The proof is given in the next section. It is unlikely that the second statement is optimal; a refinement of our method may yield an improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Powers of Two
    A. V. GERBESSIOTIS CS332-102 Spring 2020 Jan 24, 2020 Computer Science: Fundamentals Page 1 Handout 3 1 Powers of two Definition 1.1 (Powers of 2). The expression 2n means the multiplication of n twos. Therefore, 22 = 2 · 2 is a 4, 28 = 2 · 2 · 2 · 2 · 2 · 2 · 2 · 2 is 256, and 210 = 1024. Moreover, 21 = 2 and 20 = 1. Several times one might write 2 ∗ ∗n or 2ˆn for 2n (ˆ is the hat/caret symbol usually co-located with the numeric-6 keyboard key). Prefix Name Multiplier d deca 101 = 10 h hecto 102 = 100 3 Power Value k kilo 10 = 1000 6 0 M mega 10 2 1 9 1 G giga 10 2 2 12 4 T tera 10 2 16 P peta 1015 8 2 256 E exa 1018 210 1024 d deci 10−1 216 65536 c centi 10−2 Prefix Name Multiplier 220 1048576 m milli 10−3 Ki kibi or kilobinary 210 − 230 1073741824 m micro 10 6 Mi mebi or megabinary 220 40 n nano 10−9 Gi gibi or gigabinary 230 2 1099511627776 −12 40 250 1125899906842624 p pico 10 Ti tebi or terabinary 2 f femto 10−15 Pi pebi or petabinary 250 Figure 1: Powers of two Figure 2: SI system prefixes Figure 3: SI binary prefixes Definition 1.2 (Properties of powers). • (Multiplication.) 2m · 2n = 2m 2n = 2m+n. (Dot · optional.) • (Division.) 2m=2n = 2m−n. (The symbol = is the slash symbol) • (Exponentiation.) (2m)n = 2m·n. Example 1.1 (Approximations for 210 and 220 and 230).
    [Show full text]
  • Primality Testing for Beginners
    STUDENT MATHEMATICAL LIBRARY Volume 70 Primality Testing for Beginners Lasse Rempe-Gillen Rebecca Waldecker http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/stml/070 Primality Testing for Beginners STUDENT MATHEMATICAL LIBRARY Volume 70 Primality Testing for Beginners Lasse Rempe-Gillen Rebecca Waldecker American Mathematical Society Providence, Rhode Island Editorial Board Satyan L. Devadoss John Stillwell Gerald B. Folland (Chair) Serge Tabachnikov The cover illustration is a variant of the Sieve of Eratosthenes (Sec- tion 1.5), showing the integers from 1 to 2704 colored by the number of their prime factors, including repeats. The illustration was created us- ing MATLAB. The back cover shows a phase plot of the Riemann zeta function (see Appendix A), which appears courtesy of Elias Wegert (www.visual.wegert.com). 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 11-01, 11-02, 11Axx, 11Y11, 11Y16. For additional information and updates on this book, visit www.ams.org/bookpages/stml-70 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rempe-Gillen, Lasse, 1978– author. [Primzahltests f¨ur Einsteiger. English] Primality testing for beginners / Lasse Rempe-Gillen, Rebecca Waldecker. pages cm. — (Student mathematical library ; volume 70) Translation of: Primzahltests f¨ur Einsteiger : Zahlentheorie - Algorithmik - Kryptographie. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8218-9883-3 (alk. paper) 1. Number theory. I. Waldecker, Rebecca, 1979– author. II. Title. QA241.R45813 2014 512.72—dc23 2013032423 Copying and reprinting. Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy a chapter for use in teaching or research. Permission is granted to quote brief passages from this publication in reviews, provided the customary acknowledgment of the source is given.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIME-PERFECT NUMBERS Paul Pollack [email protected] Carl
    PRIME-PERFECT NUMBERS Paul Pollack Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA [email protected] Carl Pomerance Department of Mathematics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA [email protected] In memory of John Lewis Selfridge Abstract We discuss a relative of the perfect numbers for which it is possible to prove that there are infinitely many examples. Call a natural number n prime-perfect if n and σ(n) share the same set of distinct prime divisors. For example, all even perfect numbers are prime-perfect. We show that the count Nσ(x) of prime-perfect numbers in [1; x] satisfies estimates of the form c= log log log x 1 +o(1) exp((log x) ) ≤ Nσ(x) ≤ x 3 ; as x ! 1. We also discuss the analogous problem for the Euler function. Letting N'(x) denote the number of n ≤ x for which n and '(n) share the same set of prime factors, we show that as x ! 1, x1=2 x7=20 ≤ N (x) ≤ ; where L(x) = xlog log log x= log log x: ' L(x)1=4+o(1) We conclude by discussing some related problems posed by Harborth and Cohen. 1. Introduction P Let σ(n) := djn d be the sum of the proper divisors of n. A natural number n is called perfect if σ(n) = 2n and, more generally, multiply perfect if n j σ(n). The study of such numbers has an ancient pedigree (surveyed, e.g., in [5, Chapter 1] and [28, Chapter 1]), but many of the most interesting problems remain unsolved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Pseudoprimes
    The Distribution of Pseudoprimes Matt Green September, 2002 The RSA crypto-system relies on the availability of very large prime num- bers. Tests for finding these large primes can be categorized as deterministic and probabilistic. Deterministic tests, such as the Sieve of Erastothenes, of- fer a 100 percent assurance that the number tested and passed as prime is actually prime. Despite their refusal to err, deterministic tests are generally not used to find large primes because they are very slow (with the exception of a recently discovered polynomial time algorithm). Probabilistic tests offer a much quicker way to find large primes with only a negligibal amount of error. I have studied a simple, and comparatively to other probabilistic tests, error prone test based on Fermat’s little theorem. Fermat’s little theorem states that if b is a natural number and n a prime then bn−1 ≡ 1 (mod n). To test a number n for primality we pick any natural number less than n and greater than 1 and first see if it is relatively prime to n. If it is, then we use this number as a base b and see if Fermat’s little theorem holds for n and b. If the theorem doesn’t hold, then we know that n is not prime. If the theorem does hold then we can accept n as prime right now, leaving a large chance that we have made an error, or we can test again with a different base. Chances improve that n is prime with every base that passes but for really big numbers it is cumbersome to test all possible bases.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPERHARMONIC NUMBERS 1. Introduction If the Harmonic Mean Of
    MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION Volume 78, Number 265, January 2009, Pages 421–429 S 0025-5718(08)02147-9 Article electronically published on September 5, 2008 SUPERHARMONIC NUMBERS GRAEME L. COHEN Abstract. Let τ(n) denote the number of positive divisors of a natural num- ber n>1andletσ(n)denotetheirsum.Thenn is superharmonic if σ(n) | nkτ(n) for some positive integer k. We deduce numerous properties of superharmonic numbers and show in particular that the set of all superhar- monic numbers is the first nontrivial example that has been given of an infinite set that contains all perfect numbers but for which it is difficult to determine whether there is an odd member. 1. Introduction If the harmonic mean of the positive divisors of a natural number n>1isan integer, then n is said to be harmonic.Equivalently,n is harmonic if σ(n) | nτ(n), where τ(n)andσ(n) denote the number of positive divisors of n and their sum, respectively. Harmonic numbers were introduced by Ore [8], and named (some 15 years later) by Pomerance [9]. Harmonic numbers are of interest in the investigation of perfect numbers (num- bers n for which σ(n)=2n), since all perfect numbers are easily shown to be harmonic. All known harmonic numbers are even. If it could be shown that there are no odd harmonic numbers, then this would solve perhaps the most longstand- ing problem in mathematics: whether or not there exists an odd perfect number. Recent articles in this area include those by Cohen and Deng [3] and Goto and Shibata [5].
    [Show full text]
  • The Simple Mersenne Conjecture
    The Simple Mersenne Conjecture Pingyuan Zhou E-mail：[email protected] Abstract p In this paper we conjecture that there is no Mersenne number Mp = 2 –1 to be prime k for p = 2 ±1,±3 when k > 7, where p is positive integer and k is natural number. It is called the simple Mersenne conjecture and holds till p ≤ 30402457 from status of this conjecture. If the conjecture is true then there are no more double Mersenne primes besides known double Mersenne primes MM2, MM3, MM5, MM7. Keywords: Mersenne prime; double Mersenne prime; new Mersenne conjecture; strong law of small numbers; simple Mersenne conjecture. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 11A41, 11A51 1 p How did Mersenne form his list p = 2,3,5,7,13,17,19,31,67,127,257 to make 2 –1 become primes ( original Mersenne conjecture ) and why did the list have five errors ( 67 and 257 were wrong but 61,89,107 did not appear here )? Some of mathematicians have studied this problem carefully[1]. From verification results of new Mersenne conjecture we see three conditions in the conjecture all hold only for p = 3,5,7,13,17,19,31,61,127 though new Mersenne conjecture has been verified to be true for all primes p < 20000000[2,3]. If we only consider Mersenne primes and p is p k positive integer then we will discovery there is at least one prime 2 –1 for p = 2 ±1,±3 when k ≤ 7 ( k is natural number 0,1,2,3,…), however, such connections will disappear completely from known Mersenne primes when k > 7.
    [Show full text]