M25 Junction 10/A3 Wisley Interchange TR010030 6.6 EIA Scoping Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

M25 Junction 10/A3 Wisley Interchange TR010030 6.6 EIA Scoping Report M25 junction 10/A3 Wisley interchange TR010030 6.6 EIA Scoping Report Volume 6 June 2019 M25 junction 10/A3 Wisley interchange TR010030 6.6 EIA Scoping Report Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 (as amended) M25 junction 10/A3 Wisley interchange The M25 junction 10/A3 Wisley interchange Development Consent Order 202[x ] 6.6 EIA SCOPING REPORT Regulation Number: Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010030 Reference Application Document Reference TR010030/APP/6.6 Author: M25 junction 10/A3 Wisley interchange project team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version Rev 0 June 2019 Development Consent Order application Planning Inspectorate scheme reference: TR010030 Application document reference: TR010030/APP/6.6 (Vol 6) Rev 0 Page 2 of 313 M25 junction 10/A3 Wisley interchange TR010030 6.6 EIA Scoping Report Table of contents Chapter Pages Chapter 1 8 1. Introduction 9 1.1. Overview of project 9 1.2. Need for Environmental Impact Assessment 9 1.3. Purpose of the Scoping Report 10 1.4. Structure and contents of the Scoping Report 11 1.5. Responsible organisation 14 1.6. The designer 14 1.7. Key legislation and policy 15 Chapter 2 17 2. The Project 18 2.1. Need for the project 18 2.2. Project objectives 18 2.3. Project location 20 2.4. Project description 21 Chapter 3 26 3. Alternatives 27 3.1. Introduction 27 3.2. Optioneering methodology 27 3.3. Preferred Option 32 Chapter 4 34 4. Scope of the Assessment 35 4.1. General Approach 35 4.2. The EIA process 35 4.3. Proposed EIA approach for the Scheme 37 Chapter 5 44 5. Air Quality 45 5.1. Introduction 45 5.2. Study area 45 5.3. Planning and policy context 45 5.4. Baseline conditions 48 5.5. Potential impacts 56 5.6. Proposed level and scope of assessment 57 5.7. Proposed assessment methodology 58 5.8. Proposed consultation 61 5.9. Potential mitigation measures 61 5.10. Assumptions and limitations 62 5.11. Conclusion 62 6. Noise and Vibration 64 6.1. Introduction 64 6.2. Study area 64 6.3. Planning and policy context 65 6.4. Baseline conditions 67 6.5. Potential impacts 69 6.6. Proposed level and scope of assessment 70 6.7. Proposed assessment methodology 71 6.8. Proposed consultation 73 6.9. Potential mitigation measures 73 6.10. Assumptions and limitations 73 6.11. Conclusion 74 Planning Inspectorate scheme reference: TR010030 Application document reference: TR010030/APP/6.6 (Vol 6) Rev 0 Page 3 of 313 M25 junction 10/A3 Wisley interchange TR010030 6.6 EIA Scoping Report 7. Biodiversity 76 7.1. Introduction 76 7.2. Study area 76 7.3. Planning and policy context 77 7.4. Baseline conditions 83 7.5. Potential impacts 97 7.6. Proposed level and scope of assessment 98 7.7. Proposed assessment methodology 103 7.8. Proposed consultation 106 7.9. Potential mitigation measures 107 7.10. Assumptions and limitations 108 7.11. Conclusion 109 8. Road Drainage and the Water Environment 110 8.1. Introduction 110 8.2. Study area 110 8.3. Planning and policy context 111 8.4. Baseline conditions 113 8.5. Potential impacts 116 8.6. Proposed level and scope of assessment 117 8.7. Proposed assessment methodology 121 8.8. Proposed consultation 122 8.9. Potential mitigation measures 123 8.10. Assumptions and limitations 123 8.11. Conclusion 123 9. Landscape 125 9.1. Introduction 125 9.2. Study area 125 9.3. Planning and policy context 126 9.4. Baseline conditions 128 9.5. Potential impacts 132 9.6. Proposed level and scope of assessment 133 9.7. Proposed assessment methodology 137 9.8. Proposed consultation 142 9.9. Potential mitigation measures 143 9.10. Assumptions and limitations 143 9.11. Conclusion 143 10. Geology and Soils 144 10.1. Introduction 144 10.2. Study Area 144 10.3. Planning and policy context 144 10.4. Baseline conditions 145 10.5. Potential impacts 148 10.6. Proposed level and scope of assessment 148 10.7. Proposed assessment methodology 150 10.8. Proposed consultation 158 10.9. Potential mitigation measures 158 10.10. Assumptions and limitations 160 10.11. Conclusion 160 11. Cultural Heritage 162 11.1. Introduction 162 11.2. Study area 162 11.3. Planning and policy context 162 11.4. Baseline conditions 167 11.5. Potential impacts 169 11.6. Proposed level and scope of assessment 171 11.7. Proposed assessment methodology 172 11.8. Proposed consultation 175 11.9. Potential mitigation measures 176 11.10. Assumptions and limitations 176 Planning Inspectorate scheme reference: TR010030 Application document reference: TR010030/APP/6.6 (Vol 6) Rev 0 Page 4 of 313 M25 junction 10/A3 Wisley interchange TR010030 6.6 EIA Scoping Report 11.11. Conclusion 177 12. Materials and Waste 178 12.1. Introduction 178 12.2. Study area 178 12.3. Planning and policy context 178 12.4. Baseline conditions 182 12.5. Potential impacts 185 12.6. Proposed level and scope of assessment 186 12.7. Proposed assessment methodology 187 12.8. Proposed consultation 190 12.9. Potential mitigation measures 190 12.10. Assumptions and limitations 191 12.11. Conclusion 191 13. People and Communities 193 13.1. Introduction 193 13.2. Study area 193 13.3. Planning and policy context 193 13.4. Baseline conditions 197 13.5. Potential impacts 202 13.6. Proposed level and scope of assessment 204 13.7. Proposed assessment methodology 204 13.8. Proposed consultation 218 13.9. Potential mitigation measures 218 13.10. Assumptions and limitations 219 13.11. Conclusion 219 14. Climate 221 14.1. Introduction 221 14.2. Study area 221 14.3. Planning and policy context 223 14.4. Baseline conditions 226 14.5. Potential impacts 229 14.6. Proposed level and scope of assessment 229 14.7. Proposed assessment methodology 229 14.8. Vulnerably to major accident and disasters 230 14.9. Proposed consultation 230 14.10. Potential mitigation measures 231 14.11. Assumptions and limitations 232 14.12. Conclusion 232 Chapter 15 233 15. Assessment of Cumulative Effects 234 15.1. Introduction 234 15.2. Baseline 234 15.3. Proposed level and scope of assessment 237 15.4. Proposed assessment methodology 237 15.5. Potential mitigation measures 239 15.6. Assumptions and limitations 239 15.7. Conclusion 239 Chapter 16 241 16. Summary 242 Chapter 17 251 17. References 252 17.1. References 252 Chapter 18 262 18. Abbreviations and Glossary 263 18.1. Abbreviations 263 18.2. Glossary 266 Planning Inspectorate scheme reference: TR010030 Application document reference: TR010030/APP/6.6 (Vol 6) Rev 0 Page 5 of 313 M25 junction 10/A3 Wisley interchange TR010030 6.6 EIA Scoping Report Chapter 19 273 19. Location and Design Plans (incl. locations plan showing red line boundary) 274 Figures 275 Appendices 276 Appendix A. Air Quality 293 Appendix B. Noise and Vibration Data 299 Appendix C. Ecological Legislation 303 Appendix D. Soils and Geology 309 Appendix E. Gazetteer of Heritage Assets 311 Tables Table 1-1: Suggested Scoping Report Contents in PINS Advice Note 7 12 Table 1-2: Policy overview 15 Table 4-1: Significance of effects 38 Table 4-2: Effects definitions 39 Table 5-1: Relevant human health air quality criteria 46 Table 5-2: Description of AQMAs 50 3 Table 5-3: Annual mean NO2 concentrations (µg/m ) from CMS near to the Scheme 52 Table 5-4: Annual mean PM10 concentrations (µg/m3) at CMS near to the Scheme 52 Table 5-5: Number of exceedances of 24-hour mean PM10 objective and CMS near to the Scheme 52 3 Table 5-6: Annual mean NO2 diffusion tube monitoring results (µg/m ) 53 Table 5-7: Relevant receptors 55 Table 5-8: Air quality topics scoped in and out of further assessment 63 Table 6-1: Regulatory and policy framework for construction noise and vibration 66 Table 6-2: Regulatory and policy framework for operational noise and vibration 66 Table 6-3: Location and distances of NIAs from the Scheme 69 Table 6-4: Noise and vibration topics scoped in and out of further assessment 70 Table 7-1: Summary of relevant local policies 80 Table 7-2: Summary of statutory designated sites within 2 km of the Scheme 85 Table 7-3: Summary of SACs within 30 km of the Scheme 86 Table 7-4: Summary of SNCI within 2 km of the Scheme 87 Table 7-5: Summary of non-statutory conservation verges within 2 km of the Scheme 89 Table 7-6: Summary of ancient woodland within 1 km of the Scheme 90 Table 7-7: Summary of reptile survey results to date 94 Table 7-8: Nature conservation receptors that will be subject to further assessment 99 Table 7-9: Valuation of nature conservation features 100 Table 7-10: Significance of effects on nature conservation feature 104 Table 8-1: Legislation 111 Table 8-2: Surface waterbodies 114 Table 8-3: Designated sites 116 Table 8-4: Water topics scoped into further assessment 117 Table 8-5: Environmental resources, receptors and importance 119 Table 8-6: Value of water resources and their features 124 Table 9-1: Summary of attributes and key characteristics of relevant landscape character areas within Guildford Borough Council 129 Table 9-2: Summary of attributes and key characteristics of relevant landscape character areas within Elmbridge Borough Council 130 Table 9-3: Landscape resources scoped in and out for further assessment 134 Table 9-4: Visual receptors scoped in and out for further assessment 135 Table 9-5: Landscape sensitivity and typical examples 137 Table 9-6: Landscape - magnitude and nature of impact and typical descriptors 139 Table 9-7: Landscape and Visual - significance of effects categories 140 Table 9-8: Landscape - typical descriptors of significance of effect categories 140 Table 9-9: Visual - magnitude of impact and typical descriptors 141
Recommended publications
  • Scoping Opinion
    SCOPING OPINION: Proposed M25 Junction 10/A3 Wisley Interchange Improvement Case Reference: TR010030 Adopted by the Planning Inspectorate (on behalf of the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government) pursuant to Regulation 10 of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 January 2018 [This page has been intentionally left blank] 2 Scoping Opinion for M25 Junction 10/A3 Wisley Interchange CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 5 1.1 Background ................................................................................. 5 1.2 The Planning Inspectorate’s Consultation ........................................ 7 1.3 Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union ..................................... 7 2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .......................................................... 8 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................ 8 2.2 Description of the Proposed Development ....................................... 8 2.3 The Planning Inspectorate’s Comments ........................................... 9 3. EIA APPROACH ................................................................................ 13 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................. 13 3.2 Relevant National Policy Statements (NPSs) .................................. 13 3.3 Scope of Assessment .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Environmental Information Report Non-Technical Summary
    Regional Investment Programme M25 Junction 10/A3 Wisley Interchange Preliminary Environmental Information Non-technical Summary 08/02/18 Status: A1 Signed off - Publication Document Ref: HE551522-ATK-EAC-RP-LM-000002.docx Regional Investment Programme M25 Junction 10/A3 Wisley Interchange Preliminary Environmental Information Report Non-technical Summary Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Highways England’s information and use in relation to M25 Junction10/A3 Wisley Interchange Atkins Limited assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 15 pages including the cover. Document history Job number: HE551522 Document ref: HE551522-ATK-EAC-RP-LM-000002 Purpose Revision Status Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date description Issue for C02 A1 JB NDW AMB GB 08/02/18 Consultation C01 A1 For HE Review JB NDW AMB AEM 06/02/18 Revision C02 Page 2 of 15 Regional Investment Programme M25 Junction 10/A3 Wisley Interchange Preliminary Environmental Information Report Non-technical Summary Table of contents Chapter Pages 1. Introduction 5 1.1 Background to the non-technical summary 5 1.2 Overview of project 5 1.3 Purpose of the PEIR 7 1.4 Need for the project 8 1.5 Consultation 8 1.6 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) 9 2. Air Quality 9 3. Noise and Vibration 10 4. Biodiversity 10 5. Road Drainage and the Water Environment 11 6. Landscape 12 7. Geology and Soils 12 8. Cultural Heritage 12 9. People and Communities 13 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Auction Catalogue Ards Aw Wi a Nn V E a R N •
    LOCAL EXPERTISE | NATIONAL COVERAGE PROPERTY AUCTION CATALOGUE ARDS AW WI A NN V E A R N • THURSDAY 28 FEBRUARY 2019 AT 2:00 pm P • R R A O E THE WESTBURY MAYFAIR HOTEL, 37 CONDUIT STREET P Y E R E MAYFAIR, LONDON W1S 2YF T H Y T A F U O CT E ION HOUS www.networkauctions.co.uk 00875_NA_Cover_FEB 19.indd 3 04/02/2019 12:36 VENUE LOCATION THE WESTBURY MAYFAIR 37 CONDUIT STREET, MAYFAIR, LONDON W1S 2YF Opened in 1955, The Westbury Mayfair is primely located on Bond Street, in the heart of Mayfair’s fashion and arts district. The only hotel to occupy such a prized address, it shares its illustrious position with prestigious boutiques, arts institutions and city landmarks, offering an ideal base from which to explore the individuality and authentic personality of the neighbourhood. Heathrow Express at Paddington Station 3/4 mile Directions: The hotel is situated on Conduit Street between Regent Street and New Bond Street. Valet parking is available, please contact EDGWA R E R O A D the hotel for details. CARNABY STREET ST GEORGE STREET Nearest tube station: N E W B O N D REGENT STREET Oxford Circus BROOK STREET STREET CONDUIT STREET G R E E N S T www.marriott.co.uk | +44 20 7629 7755 GROSVENER STREET W O O D S M E W S UPPER BROOK ST C U L R O S S S T BURTON STREET OLD BOND STREET BERKELEY UPPER GROSVENORPARK STREET ST SQUARE DOVER STREET T 020 7871 0420 | E [email protected] www.networkauctions.co.uk INTRODUCING THE AUCTION TEAM Toby Limbrick Guy Charrison Stuart Elliott FNAVA FRICS, PPNAVA (Hons), FNAEA, FARLA, FRSA FNAVA, MARLA
    [Show full text]
  • Project Name Construction Start Actual Construction End
    Construction Construction Construction Project Name Start Actual End Planned End Actual M5 J11a-12 MP 86/9 Geotech 10/01/2013 19/04/2013 21/03/2013 M5 J20-21 VRS MP 155/5 - 159/0 10/01/2013 17/01/2014 17/01/2014 M5 J31 Exminster Drainage 02/09/2011 30/10/2011 30/10/2011 A38 Lee Mill to Voss Farm FS C 01/10/2009 01/04/2011 01/04/2011 A30 SCORRIER-AVERS W/B & E/B C 02/02/2012 01/07/2012 01/03/2012 A30 PLUSHA KENNARDS HSE E/B C 18/09/2012 24/09/2012 25/09/2012 A38 WHISTLEY HILL DRAINAGE C 07/11/2011 24/12/2011 23/12/2011 A47 Guyhirn Bank C NP 19/09/2012 28/09/2012 29/09/2012 A120 Coggeshall Bypass East C 13/11/2012 16/11/2012 16/11/2012 A14 Orwell to Levington C 04/11/2013 11/11/2013 11/11/2013 A14SpittalsI/CResurfacingC NP 02/07/2012 07/08/2013 26/07/2012 A38 Clinnick R/W & White C 11/03/2012 06/07/2012 06/07/2012 A30 Whiddon Down to Woodleigh 01/12/2011 14/02/2012 14/02/2012 A49 KIMBOLTON RETAINING-CapRd 11/02/2013 10/04/2013 30/04/2013 NO3:A404 A308toA4130 SB Appl C 16/07/2012 18/07/2012 21/07/2012 NO3 M4 J6-7 EB Cippenham C 24/09/2012 11/08/2012 16/11/2012 A36 Southington Farm Geotech C 05/09/2011 24/06/2011 21/10/2011 A303 BOSCOMBE DOWN RS C 01/01/2011 30/06/2011 30/06/2011 M5 J18 Avonmouth slip lighti C 01/02/2012 31/03/2012 31/03/2012 A303 South Pethrton St Light C 01/05/2011 30/09/2011 30/09/2011 A303Cartgate RAB St Lighting C 01/01/2012 29/02/2012 29/02/2012 A4 Portway Signals C 01/02/2011 30/09/2011 30/09/2011 M4/M5 Alm.
    [Show full text]
  • Heathrow Community Noise and Track-Keeping Report: Burhill
    Heathrow Community Noise and Track-keeping Report: Burhill This document reports on an 100-day period of continuous noise monitoring from 14 June 2011 to 21 September 2011 using a Larson Davies LD 870 sound monitor placed at the ‘Burhill’ site (positioned at 51° 21′ 9.01" N, 0° 24′ 54.37" W, 56 feet elevation). All timings are local. Background Heathrow Airport is committed to limiting the impacts of noise on communities around the airport and publishes a Noise Action Plan in accordance with National and European Regulations. An objective of the plan is to better understand local noise concerns and priorities by establishing a Community Noise and Track Monitoring Programme. As part of this Programme, the Airport has agreed with local stakeholders represented on the Noise and Track Keeping Working Group (NTKWG), that flight tracks and (where possible) noise levels affecting local communities would be examined through a series of 3-4 month studies. The studies are organised so that the noise and flight tracks are analysed over the monitoring period based on a ‘grid’ of local communities, defined and agreed with NTKWG and shown below in Figure 1. The impact on the community within the grid square is then reported at the end of the monitoring period. Figure 1. Map of the Heathrow area with noise monitoring grid; position of the noise monitor shown as a blue dot in the centre of the blue shaded grid (the Burhill community grid square area) This report describes the noise levels and aircraft tracks affecting the Burhill grid square, shown above.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Framingham Massachusetts
    TTOOWWNN OOFF FFRRAAMMIINNGGHHAAMM MMAASSSSAACCHHUUSSEETTTTSS Annual Report Year Ending December 31, 2007 Framingham’s Town Seal: In the year 1900, the Framingham Town Seal was redesigned for the Town’s bicentennial to recognize our community’s prominence in education and transportation. The Framingham State Normal School, a free public school and the first of its kind in America, is represented by the structure at the top of the design. Governor Danforth, the founder of Framingham and owner of much of its land, is acknowledged by the words “Danforth’s Farms 1662” on the shield at the center. The wheel on the shield with spokes drawn as tracks radiating in six different directions represents the steam and electric railroads and signifies the Town’s position as a transportation hub. Surrounding the words “Town of Framingham Incorporated 1700” is an illustrative border of straw braid, which honors the prominent role Framingham played in the manufacture of hats and bonnets in the 1800s. I TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION IV ORGANIZATIONAL CHART V ELECTED & APPOINTED OFFICIALS VI GENERAL GOVERNMENT 1 BOARD OF SELECTMEN 1 TOWN MANAGER 3 TOWN CLERK 4 ELECTION RESULTS 6 TOWN COUNSEL 8 HUMAN RESOURCES 33 VETERANS’ SERVICES 39 BUILDING SERVICES 41 MEDIA SERVICES 42 FINANCE 43 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 43 TOWN ACCOUNTANT 44 TREASURER/COLLECTOR 61 BOARD OF ASSESSORS 66 PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 69 RETIREMENT SYSTEM 70 PUBLIC SAFETY & HEALTH 71 POLICE DEPARTMENT 71 ANIMAL CONTROL 85 FRAMINGHAM AUXILIARY POLICE 87 FIRE DEPARTMENT 90 INSPECTIONAL SERVICES 104
    [Show full text]
  • Shipwrights Way
    The Steep section of The Shipwrights Way. Many of our readers will be aware that the ‘Shipwrights Way’, a long distance route from Alice Holt near Farnham to Portsmouth, most of which opened earlier this year, runs through our Parish for about 1.5 of its 50 miles. Some of you may have walked all or part of it already, but for those who have not, here is a brief summary about ‘our’ section. There are small blue signs along the route but they are not always that obvious depending on which direction you are walking. Starting from the northern (Liss) end, the main path enters the Parish at the bridge over the River Rother just to the east of the railway on Stodham Lane. A new bridge for cyclists and walkers has been erected to avoid the danger of the old ‘kissing gates’. There have been a few complaints from cyclists that the bridge is very difficult to negotiate and indeed my wife and I found it very hard both to push bikes up the ‘cycle gutter’ as well as down the other side. Once across the railway the route follows Tankerdale Lane westwards past Petersfield Golf Course and up to the main A3 road where you turn left. If you don’t wish to negotiate the railway bridge there is an alternative route from Liss via Andlers Ash Road to the level crossing there, after which you follow the road past Hilliers to the A3. This is a section where you have to walk alongside the road on the cycle path but then you drop down to join Steep Marsh Lane near Burnt Ash cottages.
    [Show full text]
  • A3 Road Closure – Surrey and Hampshire – Road Marking Renewal
    A3 Road Closure – Surrey and Hampshire – Road Marking Renewal We will be renewing the road markings on the A3 north and southbound carriageways, to improve road user’s journeys. In order to carry out the work as efficiently and safely as possible, we’ll need to fully close sections of the A3 overnight with clearly signed diversion routes in place. Start Date* Duration Closure Diversion Tuesday 19 July 4 nights Northbound between Longmoor and the A31 Hogs Back Via the A325 and A31 Hogs Back Monday 25 July 4 night Southbound between the A31 Hogs back and Longmoor Via the A31 Hogs Back and A325 Friday 29 July 2 nights Southbound between Sheet Link and Weston Via B2070 Tuesday 2 August 3 nights Southbound between Petersfield and Horndean Via A272, A32, M27 and A3(M) Friday 5 August 3 nights Northbound between Horndean and Petersfield Via A3(M), M27, A32 and A272 Monday 15 August 3 nights Southbound between the Ockham junction and Stoke Interchange Via the B2215, A247 and A25 Thursday 18 August 3 nights Northbound between the Stoke Interchange and Ockham junction Via the A25, A247 and B2215 Tuesday 23 August 3 nights Southbound between Stoke Park Interchange (Guildford) and Compton Via B3000, A31 Hogs Back and (Hogs Back) Guildford To be confirmed 3 nights Northbound between Compton (Hogs Back) and Stoke Park Interchange Via Guildford, A31 Hogs Back and (Guildford) B3000 Confirmed dates for the closures will be displayed in advance on black and yellow signs along the A3. Find out more We would like to apologise in advance for any disturbance or inconvenience caused during the works.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Development Authority
    ROAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Invitation for Bids (IFB) Authorised under Section 14(2) of the Public Procurement Act 2006 as amended Open International Bidding 8 Design-Build / Turnkey and Completion of the Construction of A1-A3 Link Road Bid Ref CPB/79/2017 1. The Road Development Authority invites sealed bids from eligible and qualified bidders for the Design-Build / Turnkey and Completion of the Construction of A1-A3 Link road. The works will involve, inter alia, the following: ❖ Topographical and Traffic Surveys, ❖ Intensive Geotechnical Investigations, ❖ Major earthworks near Chapman Hill, ❖ Design and Detailed engineering of the works, ❖ Design and Construction of approximately 400 m long Dual Carriageway with 1.5m wide paved hard shoulders on both sides, ❖ Design and Construction of approximately 2.7 km long Single Carriageway, 7.5m wide with 1.5m wide paved hard shoulders on both sides, ❖ Design and Construction of two roundabouts, ❖ Upgrading of 250m long single carriageway, ❖ Provision of storm water drainage system, ❖ Design and Construction of a Signalised Junction at intersection of new link road with A3 Road, ❖ Relocation of existing services, ❖ Construction works in relation with interface for the Metro Express Project. ❖ Ancillary and associated works in relation with the A1-M1 Link Road Project. ❖ Provision of miscellaneous road furniture such as guardrails, traffic signs, cat’s eyes, handrails, street lighting, etc. 2. The whole of the works shall be completed within a period of Four hundred and Seventy Five (475) calendar days from the date of issue of the Engineer’s Order to Commence. 3. Interested eligible bidders may obtain further information from the Officer in Charge, Road Development Authority (Tel:- +230 467 8600) and inspect the Bidding Documents at the address given below from 09.00 hrs to 15.00 hrs.
    [Show full text]
  • River Wey Navigation - Guildford to Pyrford Moderate Trail: Please Be Aware That the Grading of This Trail Was Set According to Normal Water Levels and Conditions
    River Wey Navigation - Guildford to Pyrford Moderate Trail: Please be aware that the grading of this trail was set according to normal water levels and conditions. Weather and water level/conditions can change the nature of trail within a short space of time so please ensure you check both of these before heading out. Route Summary Distance: 8 miles The Wey was one of the first British rivers to be made Approximate Time: 3-5 Hours navigable and opened to barge traffic in 1653 and it is The time has been estimated based on you travelling 3 – 5mph quite unusual. The Wey has two separate sources in two (a leisurely pace using a recreational type of boat). different counties. The two River Weys unite near the Type of Trail: One Way historic Tilford Oak in Surrey Waterways Travelled: River Wey Navigation The Wey and its two Navigations flow across 87 miles (140 km) of countryside yet drop a mere 98 feet (30 m) Type of Water: River, with locks and backwaters by the time the waterway joins the Thames at Weybridge. Portages and Locks: 7 locks (2 are flood gates and This 15½-mile waterway linked Guildford to Weybridge normally open) on the Thames, and then to London. The Godalming Navigation, opened in 1764, enabled barges to work a Nearest Town: Guildford further four miles upriver. The award-winning visitor Start: Riverside Road, Bellfields, Guildford, GU1 1LW centre at Dapdune Wharf in Guildford tells the story of the Navigations and the people who lived and worked on Finish: Anchor Pub, Riverside Road, GU23 6QW them.
    [Show full text]
  • Chertsey Division
    County of Surrey CHERTSEY DIVISION Register of Electors, 1918 An Alphabetical Index of Naval/Military and/or Absent Voters Surrey History Centre Reference: CC802/27/1 This document contains the names of individuals who were included in the 1918 Electoral Register for the Chertsey Parliamentary Division of Surrey, and who were recorded as being either Naval, Military and/or absent voters. Notes: Not all Naval/Military voters may have been correctly designated “NM” and not all absent voters may have been Naval/Military personnel, in which case their entries are highlighted in orange text. Red text denotes a possible error, or information derived from a different source, such as the 1919 Chertsey Electoral Register. This is particularly the case for the Parish of Bisley (Dii), because parts of the pages for this Parish are missing in the Electoral Register held at the Surrey History Centre. Entry Nos. 547-573, 578-628, 634-660, 794-812 & 825 are affected. Some individuals were killed in action, or otherwise died, in the period between when the Register was compiled and the cessation of hostilities in November 1918. Some voters may appear more than once. This Index is therefore intended only as a guide to further research and no guarantee of accuracy is given. Key to Parishes/Wards: A ............................................................ Byfleet I(ii) ................................................ Egham Hythe B(i) ................................................ West Byfleet J(i) ............................................... Virginia
    [Show full text]
  • Property in Surrey England
    Property In Surrey England Chthonian and hypogeal Hiro wited her extrapolator captivated while Radcliffe magnetized some Deirdre contrariwise. Huggable Quent thronesreforest accusatively.some detainment and prostitute his tusseh so downstage! Straying and utilizable Pip often ligate some britzkas prophetically or We needed on preserving the site of this property valuation provides a second bedroom family in surrey homes steeped in the email The fire door opens into my large entrance hall with striking windows flooding the space is natural light. Please click here are mainly laid over certain plans have come back anytime, bushy park their dream self catering property after all of central exposed timber door. Hiding on the southern tip of Surrey, this larger than life scheme has hidden treats tucked down city street. Northchapel is within an incredibly clean, means we have students from while you need to travel to know it all sitters verified with botanical prints, if a david lloyd centre. Kingston upon Thames offers more extensive shopping including department stores and leisure activities. The ideal space and integrated appliances and modernise it enjoys a wealth of in property surrey hills; mains gas fired aga is within its integrity and registered with. Buy Wimbledon House in Surrey England c113 original antique engraved view Historical Political Amazoncom FREE DELIVERY possible that eligible. He was a household name but generally a bustling towns, surrey property in england, surrey hills area to a trivselhus home in residential property is such a range cooker. We thoroughly enjoyed exploring the Wey Navigation and think of the Thames. Polesden Lacey, Winkworth Arboretum, Claremont Landscape Garden, Hatchlands Park and Runnymede.
    [Show full text]