DOCSLIB.ORG

January 8, 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
January 8, 2021 JOINT REVIEW PANEL IN THE MATTER OF the Coal Conservation Act Application Nos. 1844520, 1902073, Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act Application No. 001-00403427; IN THE MATTER OF the Water Act Application Nos. 001-00403428, 001-00403429, 001- 00403430, 001-00403431, and Public Lands Act Application Nos. MSL160757, MSL160758, LOC160841, LOC160842, and LOC970943; and IN THE MATTER OF Benga Mining Limited Grassy Mountain Coal Project Impact Assessment Agency of Canada Reference No. 80101. Written Argument of the Coalition of Alberta Wilderness Association and Grassy Mountain Group (“the Coalition”) January 8, 2021 ACKROYD LLP Ifeoma M. Okoye Richard C. Secord 1500 First Edmonton Place 10665 Jasper Avenue Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3S9 Telephone: (780) 423-8905 Fax: (780) 423-8946 Counsel for the Coalition TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................1 2.0 The Public Interest .............................................................................................................3 3.0 Requested Disposition ........................................................................................................4 4.0 Review Framework ............................................................................................................5 4.1 Species at Risk Act Considerations .........................................................................8 5.0 The Environmental Assessment......................................................................................11 5.1 Purpose of the Project, visual aesthetics, alternative means, land and resource use, socio-economic effects and historic resources ...........................................................................12 5.1.1. Project Need and Purpose .....................................................................................12 5.1.2 Land and Resource Use and Visual Impacts .........................................................14 5.1.3 Access Issues .........................................................................................................16 5.1.4 Property Devaluation ............................................................................................25 5.1.5 Landowner Effects and Mine Permit Boundary (“MPB”) ....................................31 5.1.6 Socio-Economic Effects ........................................................................................32 5.2 Geology, geotechnical (including dam safety) and mining, accidents and malfunctions, industrial waste and waste management, effects of the environment on the Project (including climate change) and other issues. ................................................................40 5.2.1 Climate change - The Coalition Evidence ............................................................40 5.2.2 Views of the Coalition ..........................................................................................40 5.2.3 Conclusion .............................................................................................................57 5.3 Vegetation, including species at risk, terrain and soils, including reclamation, conservation, closure, and biodiversity ......................................................................................60 5.3.1 Overview ...............................................................................................................60 5.3.2 Whitebark and Limber Pine ..................................................................................62 5.3.3 Rough Fescue Grasslands .....................................................................................71 5.3.4 Significance of Project’s effects ............................................................................73 5.3.5 Conservation and Reclamation .............................................................................74 5.3.6 Reply to Benga’s Comments on Mr. Wallis Evidence .........................................75 5.3.7 Cumulative Effects ................................................................................................78 5.4 Water, including surface and groundwater management, quantity and quality, selenium management and aquatic resources, including fish, fish habitat, and fish species at risk ............................................................................................................................................80 Coalition of AWA and Grassy Mountain Group Benga Mining Limited Written Argument of the Coalition Grassy Mountain Coal Project January 8, 2021 5.4.1 Water, including Surface and groundwater management, quantity and quality and selenium management .................................................................................................................80 5.4.1.1 The Coalition Evidence ........................................................................................80 5.4.1.2 Water Worst Case Scenarios and the Public Interest ............................................80 5.4.1.3 Hydrogeology and the SRK Groundwater Numerical Model ..............................82 5.4.1.4 Groundwater-Surface Water Interaction and the SRK GoldSim Model ............127 5.4.1.5 Geochemistry .....................................................................................................142 5.4.1.6 Conclusion on Models used by Benga to support its application to remove the top of Grassy Mountain ..........................................................................................................157 5.4.1.7 Comments on Benga’s Final Argument relating to Dr. Fennell ........................161 5.4.1.8 Comments on Mr. O’Gorman’s Wrap Up Questions to Benga .........................163 5.4.2 Aquatic Resources including Fish and Fish Habitat and Fish Species At Risk .......168 5.4.2.1 The Coalition evidence ......................................................................................168 5.4.2.1.1 Mr. Allan Locke ............................................................................................169 5.4.2.1.2 Mr. Lorne Fitch .............................................................................................170 5.4.2.1.3 Dr. John Post .................................................................................................174 5.5. Dust, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and light .....................................178 5.5.1 Noise ...................................................................................................................178 5.5.2 Air Quality ..........................................................................................................187 5.6 Wildlife, including migratory birds and species at risk, wildlife health, and human health risk assessment................................................................................................................189 5.6.1 Reply to Benga’s Argument regarding Evidence of Mr. Wallis .........................193 6.0 Concluding Remarks .....................................................................................................194 2 Coalition of AWA and Grassy Mountain Group Benga Mining Limited Written Argument of the Coalition Grassy Mountain Coal Project January 8, 2021 1.0 Introduction 1. These are the written argument filed on behalf of the Coalition of the Alberta Wilderness Association and Grassy Mountain Group (“Coalition”) with respect to the Joint Review Panel’s (“JRP” or the “Panel”) consideration of Benga Mining Limited’s (“Benga”) applications1 under the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada’s (“IAAC”) Reference No. 80101 for the Grassy Mountain Coal Project (“Project”). 2. The Project involves an open pit mine for extracting bituminous coal suitable for steelmaking, a coal handling and preparation plant with associated infrastructure, an overland conveyor system paralleling an existing access corridor and connecting to a rail load out facility and a new section of rail track.2 The Project will be located in southwest Alberta, approximately 150km southwest of Calgary in the Crowsnest Pass and will cover areas within Townships 08 and 09 and Ranges 03 and 04 West of the 5th Meridian. The steelmaking coal processing facility will be located approximately 7km north of Blairmore.3 3. The Coalition was granted full participation rights in this matter by the Panel on June 29, 2020 in the Panel’s June 29 letter and confirmed in the August 10, 2020 letter4. 4. The members of the Coalition, the descriptions of their lands and locations relative to the mine permit boundary are as follows: No Name Legal Land Description Location relative to (if applicable) the mine permit boundary 1 Fran Gilmar, Mitch and Rose SW30-8-3-W5M Within mine boundary Bonertz 2 Larry and Barb Donkersgoed, SW19-8-3-W5M Within mine boundary Donkersgoed Feeders Ltd. 3 Ed and Shannon SW19-8-3-W5M Within mine boundary Donkersgoed, Berdina Farms Ltd. 4 Norman and Connie SE19-8-3-W5M Adjacent to the mine Watmough, Tyler Watmough, boundary Sun Cured Alfalfa Cubes Inc. 5 Shirley Kirby Plan 1014575 Block 19 7km south of the 1 The applications are: Coal Conservation Act Application Nos. Coal Conservation Act Application Nos. 1844520, 1902073, Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act Application No. 001-00403427; the Water Act Application Nos. 001-00403428, 001-00403429, 001-00403430, 001-00403431, and Public Lands Act Application Nos. MSL160757, MSL160758, LOC160841, LOC160842, and LOC970943 2 Benga’s Application,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contrary to Popular Belief, Coal Is Alive in Canada — but We Can Change That - Ipolitics
    8/11/2021 Contrary to popular belief, coal is alive in Canada — but we can change that - iPolitics (https://ipolitics.ca/) SUBSCRIBE (HTTPS://IPOLITICS.CA/SUBSCRIBE) OPINIONS Contrary to popular belief, coal is alive in Canada — but we can change that By David Khan (https://ipolitics.ca/author/david-khan/). Published on Feb 26, 2021 4:08pm 'Despite Ottawa’s very public promises to “power past” thermal coal and phase out coal-powered electricity in Canada, we continue to mine it here in Alberta and sell it to the world.' Coal (Dexter Frenandes/Pexel photo) Email (mailto:?subject=I want you to Facebook read this article [Contrary to popular (https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php? text=Contrary+to+popular+belief%2C+coal+is+a belief, coal is alive in Canada — but we u=https://ipolitics.ca/2021/02/26/contrary-to- can change that]&body=Check out this popular-belief-coal-is-alive-in-canada-but-we- article: can-change-that/) https://ipolitics.ca/2021/02/26/contrary- to-popular-belief-coal-is-alive-in- canada-but-we-can-change-that/.) Recently, cattle ranchers, environmental activists, members of the Blood Tribe and Siksika Nation — and even a couple country singers — came together to oppose the Alberta government’s decision to quietly rescind the 1976 Coal Policy (https://www.alberta.ca/coal-policy-guidelines.aspx). It was an inspiring Albertan story — a prime example of the do-it-yourself attitude Albertans take pride in. Together, the First Nations, ranchers, environmentalists, musicians, and other Albertans spoke against a decision that left iconic Rocky Mountain peaks open to destructive mining practices, and risked poisoning watersheds that drain into the rest of the province and beyond via rivers across Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and the Northwest Territories.
    [Show full text]
  • Emission Abatement Potential for the Alberta Oil Sands Industry and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Applicability to Coal-Fired Electricity Generation and Oil Sands
    Canadian Energy Research Institute Emission Abatement Potential for the Alberta Oil Sands Industry and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Applicability to Coal-Fired Electricity Generation and Oil Sands Zoey Walden Study No. 126 October 2011 Relevant • Independent • Objective EMISSION ABATEMENT POTENTIAL FOR THE ALBERTA OIL SANDS INDUSTRY AND CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE (CCS) APPLICABILITY TO COAL-FIRED ELECTRICITY GENERATION AND OIL SANDS Emission Abatement Potential for the Alberta Oil Sands Industry and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Applicability to Coal-Fired Electricity Generation and Oil Sands Copyright © Canadian Energy Research Institute, 2011 Sections of this study may be reproduced in magazines and newspapers with acknowledgement to the Canadian Energy Research Institute ISBN 1-927037-03-4 Author: Zoey Walden Acknowledgements: The author of this report would like to extend thanks and gratitude to everyone involved in the production and editing of the material, including, but not limited to Carlos Murillo, Afshin Honarvar, Dinara Millington, Jon Rozhon, Thorn Walden, Peter Howard and most notably Megan Murphy. CANADIAN ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE 150, 3512 – 33 Street NW Calgary, Alberta T2L 2A6 Canada www.ceri.ca October 2011 Printed in Canada Emission Abatement Potential for the Alberta Oil Sands Industry and Carbon Capture iii and Storage (CCS) Applicability to Coal-Fired Electricity Generation and Oil Sands Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Framework for Coal Development in Alberta
    1982) COAL DEVELOPMENT 117 THE LEGALFRAMEWORK FOR COALDEVELOPMENT IN ALBERTA L. DOUGLAS RAE• This paper examines the legal and regulatory regime that has been developed by the government of the Province of Alberta in order to implement the specific aspects of the Alberta coal policy. I. INTRODUCTION In June of 1976 the government of the Province of Alberta, through the Department of Energy and Natural Resources, issued a landmark docu­ ment which was to be the basis for coal development in the province from that time forward. Entitled "A Coal Development Policy for Alberta" 1 it is commonly referred to as the "coal policy". In the five years since the document's issuance, the Alberta government has, for the most part, im­ plemented both the general and specific aspects of the policy. It is the pur­ pose of this paper to outline the legislative and regulatory framework through which the coal policy is currently being implemented. The coal policy purports to govern the extraction of coal resources by all methods, including surface mining, underground mining and in situ processes yet to be developed. It must be remembered that the coal policy not only governs the exploration for and extraction of coal resources, but also designates those areas which for the foreseeable future are to be untouched by coal development. Coal deposits in Alberta underlie large areas of the plains, foothills and Rocky Mountains. The coal policy, as it relates to deposits found in the foothills and Rocky Mountains, must be applied in conjunction with the land use zones specified in "A Policy for Resource Management of the Eastern Slopes," 2 which has direct impact on the manner and method of coal development in those areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy 569 the Company Was Evaluating a Potential Hydraulic Mine at Eagle Mountain in Anticipation of Expanded Output, Byron
    Energy 569 The company was evaluating a potential hydraulic mine at Eagle Mountain in anticipation of expanded output, Byron Creek Collieries produced approximately 343 000 t of clean coal in 1976 for both domestic and export markets. Production will be expanded to meet increased demands from Ontario Hydro for western bituminous coal over the next few years, Studies continued in 1976 in several areas of BC on potential metallurgical and thermal coal developments. In northeastern BC, marketing, transportation, socio- economic and feasibility studies were under way at several locations. Prospects for exporting coking coal in the early 1980s dépend on world demand and competitiveness in world markets. In southeastern BC, European, Japanese and Canadian interests continued feasibility studies on new and existing properties, BC Hydro and Power Authority conducted studies into the potential use of its Hat Creek lignite deposits near Ashcroft for future power génération. In mid-1977, the province announced a policy to form the basis for current and future development of coal resources. The new policy outlined a licence system incorporating compétitive bidding; committed BC's coal resources to development consistent with other provincial objectives; retained the existing $1,36 a tonne royalty; lied BC's export coal prices to world prices; and reserved BC's coal for provincial, other Canadian and finally, foreign needs, Alberta. In terms of volume, Alberta is Canada's leading coal-producing province, mining bituminous, sub-bituminous, and semi-anthracite coals with the sub- bituminous coal used primarily to générale electricity, Most bituminous coal is now exported to Japan for coke making, although some is destined for shipment to Ontario for electric power génération in the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • The End of Coal: Alberta's Coal Phase-Out
    The End of Coal: Alberta’s coal phase-out IISD REPORT Lauren Vriens May 2018 © 2014 The International Institute for Sustainable Development © 2018 International Institute for Sustainable Development | IISD.org The End of Coal: Alberta’s coal phase-out © 2018 International Institute for Sustainable Development Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development International Institute for Sustainable Development The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is an Head Office independent think tank championing sustainable solutions to 21st– century problems. Our mission is to promote human development 111 Lombard Avenue, Suite 325 and environmental sustainability. We do this through research, analysis Winnipeg, Manitoba and knowledge products that support sound policy-making. Our big- Canada R3B 0T4 picture view allows us to address the root causes of some of the greatest challenges facing our planet today: ecological destruction, social Tel: +1 (204) 958-7700 exclusion, unfair laws and economic rules, a changing climate. IISD’s Website: www.iisd.org staff of over 120 people, plus over 50 associates and 100 consultants, Twitter: @IISD_news come from across the globe and from many disciplines. Our work affects lives in nearly 100 countries. Part scientist, part strategist—IISD delivers the knowledge to act. IISD is registered as a charitable organization in Canada and has 501(c) (3) status in the United States. IISD receives core operating support from the Government of Canada, provided through the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and from the Province of Manitoba. The Institute receives project funding from numerous governments inside and outside Canada, United Nations agencies, foundations, the private sector and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta's Coal Phase-Out: a Just Transition?
    Alberta’s Coal Phase-Out: A Just Transition? Ian Hussey and Emma Jackson This report was published by Parkland Institute November 2019 © All rights reserved. Acknowledgements iii About the Authors iii About Parkland Institute iv Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 11 2. Overview of Alberta’s Coal Power Industry, Communities, and Workforce 14 3. Key Principles and Lessons from the Just Transition Literature 16 Contents Just Transition as an Inherent Right 17 A Just Transition for Workers 17 A Just Transition for Communities 20 Program Design and Implementation 21 4. The Transition of Alberta’s Coal Power Corporations 23 TransAlta Case Study 26 ATCO Case Study 31 Capital Power Case Study 35 5. Alberta’s Transition Programs for Coal Workers 40 6. Alberta’s Transition Programs for Coal Communities 46 Parkland County Case Study 46 7. Analytic Discussion of the Research Results 52 Evaluating the Transition Programs for Alberta’s Coal Power Workers 52 Evaluating the Transition Programs for Alberta’s Coal Power Communities 53 Evaluating the Overall Program Design and Implementation of Alberta’s 54 Transition Away from Coal Power 8. Conclusion 56 Appendix: Timeline of Key Dates 59 Endnotes 65 References 68 All Parkland Institute reports are available free of charge at parklandinstitute.ca. Printed copies can be ordered for $10. Your financial support helps us to continue to offer our publications free online. To find out how you can support Parkland Institute, to order printed copies, or to obtain rights to copy this report, please contact us: Tables Parkland Institute Table 1. Alberta’s Coal-Fired Electricity Units, July 2019 25 University of Alberta 1-12 Humanities Centre Table 2.
    [Show full text]
  • INSTITUTE for ECONOMIC RESEARCH QUEEN's UNIVERSITY Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L
    ISSN 0316-5078 INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6 A Model of Energy Supply From Western Canada by John Rowse Queen's University May, 1979 Discussion Paper No. 344 ABSTRACT This paper discusses a static multiregional linear programming model of energy supply from western Canada. This model has been constructed as part of an effort to measure production labour requirements, regional wealth accrual and economic resource rents associated with different energy resource development scenarios. Demands and prices are exogenous to the model and supplies are determined to maximize the increment to gross domestic product generated by energy resource production. The, optimal solution yields a pattern of production and economic rent distribution which would obtain if actual prices were specified exogenously and energy markets functioned in a perfectly competitive manner to meet demands. Thus the most economic supply alternatives are utilized most intensively, low-cost producers rewarded most heavily and highest rents awarded to production capacities and reserves in particularly short supply. Two major advantages of the approach are. (i) the most economic patterns of production and transport of energy products can be determined independently of the externally imposed restrictions characterizing Canadian energy product markets, allowing inefficiencies to be pinpointed and quantified, and (ii) it allows the price of each energy product to have a direct impact on the shadow prices of constraints on energy
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta's Provincial Energy Strategy
    Launching Alberta’s Energy Future. PROVINCIal ENERGY STRATEGY Photo credit: cover bottom left - Drake Landing Solar Community Acknowledgments The Government of Alberta would like to thank the members of the Provincial Energy Strategy Advisory Committee. The input and expertise of the committee members was invaluable in the development of this document. • Dr. Michael Percy, University of Alberta (Chair) • Brendan Bell, formerly Minister of Energy and the Environment of the North West Territories • William Gunter, formerly with the Alberta Research Council • Robert Mansell, University of Calgary • Clive Mather, Iogen Corporation • Michael Raymont, LACC Group • Lorne Taylor, formerly Environment Minister of Alberta • Linda Van Gastel, Alberta Science and Research Authority • Peter Watson, Deputy Minister of Energy (Ex Officio) ALBERTA’S PROVINCIAL ENERGY STRATEGY • 1 Message from the Minister of Energy The Provincial Energy Strategy is a comprehensive plan for Alberta’s energy future and it supports our government’s priority of ensuring that our energy resources are developed in an environmentally sustainable way. In our vision for our energy future, Alberta will remain a global leader, recognized as a responsible world-class energy supplier, an energy technology champion, a sophisticated energy consumer, and a solid global environmental citizen. To realize this vision we must act now to achieve the strategic outcomes outlined in this strategy of clean energy production, wise energy use, and sustained economic prosperity. Clean energy production will be achieved through the application of energy technology leadership such as our government’s investment in development and implementation of gasification technology and carbon capture and storage. In a world counting on energy from all sources, Alberta’s advantage lies in being able to produce and consume fossil fuels in a far cleaner way, but our commitment extends to the increasing role of alternative and renewable energy.
    [Show full text]
  • ST98-2012: Alberta's Energy Reserves 2011 and Supply
    ST98-2012 Alberta’s Energy Reserves 2011 and Supply/Demand Outlook 2012–2021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following ERCB staff contributed to this report: Principal Authors: Reserves―Michael Teare, Andy Burrowes, Cathy Baturin-Pollock, Dean Rokosh, Curtis Evans, Patricia Gigantelli, and Rick Marsh; Supply/Demand and Economics―Banafsheh Ashrafi, Charles Tamblyn, Shimpei Ito, Andrea Willwerth, Mussie Yemane, Joseph Fong, Marie-Anne Kirsch, and Carol Crowfoot; Editors: Carol Crowfoot, Rick Marsh, Kevin Parks, and Fran Hein; Data: Debbie Giles, Judy Van Horne, Glen Tsui, and Afshan Mahmood; Production: Jennifer Wagner, Nicole Dunn, Aaron Dalton, Sarah Hamza, Karen Logan, Robert de Grace, and Jessica Riches; Communications Advisor: Darin Barter Coordinator: Rick Marsh For inquiries regarding reserves, contact Rick Marsh at 403-297-8218 or Andy Burrowes at 403-297-8566. For inquiries regarding supply/demand, contact Marie-Anne Kirsch at 403-297-8476. ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION BOARD ST98-2012: Alberta’s Energy Reserves 2011 and Supply/Demand Outlook 2012–2021 ISSN 1910-4235 June 2012 The following related documents are also available from ERCB Information Services (telephone: 403-297-8311; when connected, press 2): • CD with detailed data tables for crude oil and natural gas, as well as map of Designated Fields, Oil Sands Areas, and Development Entities, $546 • CD with Gas Reserves Code Conversion File, $459 • CD with Gas Pool Reserve File (ASCII format), $3095 • CD with Oil Pool Reserves File (ASCII format), $1834 • Map of Designated Fields, Oil
    [Show full text]
  • ~ Coal in Saskatchewan
    . ' . ' - ~ COAL IN SASKATCHEWAN - . '. I . ·ATechnical Report Prepared by . · · . Saskatchewan Energy and Mines ' ' I . - . - . SECURITY AND PROSPERITY December 1994 . , ' THROUGH RESPONSIBLE ''. ENERGY DEVELOPMENT . - , -. ' rs·· ,t:'·..(~· :,.. ... .. ,._.., ~ , • .. ~ ·II Saskatchewa~ . .;( : : • : :• · · : Energy and. Mines . ~ ----.....: ~ · 11t,. • _ .. ~ ........... '- • • ,r - .. Miscellaneous Report 95-1 O · t ..... ' .. ........... ·••. • , .. __ . .. ; , .. .. ;,---- -r~. / ·-. - .- ;,...,. ' / :, .•· ·. l ·~ --~ - -~-- .-::"-- -- -;-·_·_.__ :_/ :- ·.'\,~: . ,~ - - .·-.. ·, \ .. · .. ·::.7".,_ y.,,, - - ,_' :-_,..,.. - 4 ~ ,.. " · :-·.· ~--·._ .,._._-~- ... ~::'' ·. ./ ·- ··-~:__·~~-: _~_,: ··;-: ... -~ : ·.~ - '· .: -., t 'L-~ •• ·1-~: ~ · ;.. - - ,.·- '.;.. ·,:__.....-- · " . ' a . : ·.r,·:. _.:_;;._~--(~<- ·. ,. ;-\ \ ' - . _:~ COAL:IN:;SASKATCHEWAN'_ ~.- - ... ,~ :i-<··_,. \-:\_7-1~, ,c' . ·¥,- ,' : . ~- , '~ : ,, / .. ~ :~ ..... : \. --rf:_:? ,s--,- ' v ·. ~ :-. : ·: '~'-':- ' -~ --: ''; \ -~. J.: -. ·: i .- _,,. ~-- --"__:_::·.>.--::--, , ., ,._ ~:-:~:,, ';]~-r . ·-... ,_ . 'f-."\/: _,? A-Te·~~-~ita{J¢p,~r!?P(~pai.ed:~1 ;\ -. ,. , . .. ;: ~ - ; ·;··~ . ·_ _-c ··--~ --· ·. ,.· , .. -~ ;·Saik~tcliewfn ._:En(tgf~·bd~Mioe~-_:,~-·. ;_;,, (. ....... "; }:~_--~---,:._y ..-. : '.: .. ~,: . ·_ .'.~-~-:_:\:_""_·r~~:~-;~~<.:. ·. !'.~~~~,--·.·-- --·- - ... \··· - ··;.. --· '("' I ·- I· · . i _.<- :~:'. / ~t7':·.~· -· :~_,~ 'l.,-·· :_l;::: ::n~c~mber:;fg,94 i:.. : ~ -r .~ECURITY AND ,PirOSPERitr : .ff;f~'.'.}~~, :;fc .:I;:,,. · ·THROUGH
    [Show full text]
  • Coal and Mineral Development in Alberta 2012 Year in Review
    Coal and Mineral Development in Alberta 2012 Year in Review Metallic and industrial mineral activity Coal mining and projects Land-use planning Alberta mineral tenure and royalty Mineral assessment reports Alberta Energy Resource Revenue and Operations Division Contents Coal and Mineral Development Branch Introduction 3 11th Floor, North Petroleum Plaza 2012 metallic and industrial 9945-108 St NW mineral exploration highlights 3 Edmonton, AB T5K 2G6 Mine activities – metallic and industrial minerals 7 2012 coal exploration highlights 10 Phone: 780-427-7707 Mine activities – coal 10 Fax: 780-422-5447 Updates 14 Email: [email protected] Legislation 15 Web: www.energy.alberta.ca/OurBusiness/minerals.asp New publications 15 www.energy.alberta.ca/OurBusiness/coal.asp Land-use planning 16 Energy and Mines Ministers’ Conference 18 All Alberta Acts and Regulations are available online: About Alberta’s regulatory system 19 www.qp.alberta.ca/Laws_Online.cfm Appendix 21 Permit and Leasing Toolkits www.energy.alberta.ca/minerals/547.asp The information contained within this report has been collected from publicly available government information, company websites, press releases, and reports filed on Sedar (www. Coal and Mineral Development in Alberta Year in Review sedar.com). All figures quoted are current as of the time of publication. Please consult the company websites for specific January 2013 information regarding any projects outlined in this report. Any ISBN 978-1-4601-0567-2 (Print) other references are noted within the document. The authors ISBN 978-1-4601-0568-9 (Online) make no warranty of any kind with respect to the content and accept no liability, either incidental, consequential, financial or otherwise, arising from the use of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • HYDROGEN STRATEGY for CANADA Seizing the Opportunities for Hydrogen a Call to Action December, 2020
    HYDROGEN STRATEGY FOR CANADA Seizing the Opportunities for Hydrogen A Call to Action December, 2020 DISCLAIMER The Hydrogen Strategy for Canada (the “Strategy”) provides the perspective of numerous stakeholders from across governments, and industry, as well as Indigenous organizations, non-governmental organizations, and academia. While the Government of Canada led the development of the Strategy and consulted broadly with industry, the contents, findings, and recommendations expressed in the Strategy reflects a combined view and may not be unanimously endorsed by all of the participating organizations and their employees. Aussi disponible en français sous le titre : Stratégie canadienne pour l’hydrogène Cat. No. M134-65/2020E-PDF (Online) ISBN 978-0-660-36760-6 Foreword to the Hydrogen Strategy for Canada For more than a century, our nation’s brightest minds have been working on the technology to turn the invisible promise of hydrogen into tangible solutions. Canadian ingenuity and innovation has once again brought us to a pivotal moment. As we rebuild our economy from the impacts of COVID-19 and fight the existential threat of climate change, the development of low-carbon hydrogen is a strategic priority for Canada. The time to act is now. The Hydrogen Strategy for Canada lays out an ambitious framework for actions that will cement hydrogen as a tool to achieve our goal of net-zero emissions by 2050 and position Canada as a global, industrial leader of clean renewable fuels. This strategy shows us that by 2050, clean hydrogen can help us achieve our net-zero goal—all while creating jobs, growing our economy, and protecting our environment.
    [Show full text]