Crowsnest Déjà Vu Coal Branch Reclamation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crowsnest Déjà Vu Coal Branch Reclamation NOVEMBER 2014 Time to Kick the Coal Habit What About Carbon Storage? Crowsnest Déjà Vu Coal Branch Reclamation Editor: CONTENTS Ian Urquhart NOVEMBER 2014 • VOL. 22, NO. 5 Graphic Design: Doug Wournell B Des, ANSCAD Printing: Features Association News Colour printing and process is sponsored by Topline Printing 5 Get Off Coal: 22 Wilderness Defender Awards A Doctor’s Prescription 26 How Many Bucks Does It Take? 8 Should we embrace carbon capture and storage? 28 Cows as Stewards: Hyland Armstrong’s AWA Talk 10 Crowsnest Pass Coal Mining: A Déjà Vu to Avoid Departments 14 Coal Mine Reclamation in the Coal Branch: Gear Ideas A Volunteer Steward’s Perspective 30 Kilini Creek and Gravel 18 Events ALBERTA WILDERNESS Mining Impacts: A Microcosm of Cumulative ASSOCIATION Impacts on Alberta Water Resources 31 Fall Events “Defending Wild Alberta through Awareness and Action” Alberta Wilderness Association is Cover Photo a charitable non-government Competing Prizes organization dedicated to the – can we have both completion of a protected areas healthy landscapes donation, call 403-283-2025 or and coal mining? This contribute online at question is raised by AlbertaWilderness.ca. Carolyn Campbell’s Wild Lands Advocate is published bi- photo of the coal monthly, 6 times a year, by Alberta sought by Grande Wilderness Association. The opinions Cache Coal. PHOTO: expressed by the authors in this © C. CAMPBELL publication are not necessarily those of AWA. The editor reserves the right to edit, reject or withdraw articles and letters submitted. Please direct questions and comments to: Featured Artist: Lisa Kozokowsky 403-283-2025 • [email protected] Lisa Kozokowsky combines oils, metals, and encaustics (wax Subscriptions to the WLA are $30 per based paints) to create rich abstractive Western Canadian year. To subscribe, call 403-283-2025 landscapes. Her artistic vision, where colour, movement, and or see AlbertaWilderness.ca. illusion merge together, animates powerful and intriguing pieces that float between contemporary and historical painting styles. What Lisa calls her “wild woman” style draws from the richness she sees in both the natural and the man-made environment. Primarily self-taught, Lisa’s work may be found in individual and corporate collections across Canada and the United States. In Calgary her art may be seen at Latitude Art Gallery http://www.latitudeartgallery.com. For more of Lisa’s imaginative and abstractive interpretations of Box 6398, Station D, Western Canada visit her website: http://www.lisakozokowsky.com. Calgary, Alberta T2P 2E1 403-283-2025 Toll-free 1-866-313-0713 www.AlbertaWilderness.ca AWA respects the privacy of members. Lists are not sold or traded in any manner. AWA is a federally registered charity [email protected] and functions through member and donor support. Tax-deductible donations may be made to AWA at Box 6398 Station D, Calgary, AB T2P 2E1. Ph: 403-283-2025 Fax: 403-270-2743 E-mail: [email protected] www.AlbertaWilderness.ca ISSN 1192-6287 How About a Lump of Coal in Coal’s Stocking This Christmas? The idea for the features focus in this the industry a $16 million refund from only will TransAlta transition off coal but issue of Wild Lands Advocate came from the 2011-12 production year. Sweet. it also is expected to spend $30 million an op/ed piece I read in an April 2014 Given what we know about the human to support economic development and issue of the Edmonton Journal. Drs. Joe and environmental costs of thermal coal energy efficiency jobs in the affected Vipond and Raquel Feroe, two members production it’s high time the provincial community. It also is expected to spend of the Canadian Association of Physicians government took strong action to a further $25 million to develop clean for the Environment, described in painful transition Alberta to other source of energy technology in Washington. detail coal royalties – one example of electricity (52 percent of Alberta’s Taking the equivalent coal-generating the provincial government’s favouritism electricity in 2013 came from coal-fired capacity off of Alberta’s electricity towards Alberta’s coal industry. Coal generating plants). If Premier Prentice grid would reduce Alberta’s coal-fired companies pay a pittance to the public wants to finally put Alberta on the path to generating capacity by 23 percent from for the coal they strip and dig out of our reduce greenhouse gas emissions it makes the 2013 level. Let’s hope Premier prairie and mountain landscapes. tremendous sense to tackle coal. Such Prentice sees this move as an important My pain became something else once action could be central to developing a first step that would benefit Albertans I started to look more closely at the serious climate change strategy. and the climate alike. royalty situation. That transformative Now such an idea may encourage some moment came when I discovered that, captains of industry to suggest that the Ian Urquhart, Editor in 2012-13, 34.7 million tonnes of coal end of days is nigh. Nonsense. In 2011 were produced here and Alberta didn’t the Washington State legislature passed collect a penny from it! In fact, the the so-called TransAlta energy bill – a government didn’t just effectively give law requiring TransAlta to transition away royalty-free coal that year it paid its Centralia coal-generating electricity companies $2.7 million because it owed plant completely off coal by 2025. Not Coal Branch Sports Day circa 1920 Royalties: Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose 55 cents per tonne: Alberta’s 1992 thermal coal royalty AND Alberta’s royalty today. In 1992 dollars today’s 55-cent thermal coal royalty only would have been worth 37 cents. In inflation-adjusted terms then, today’s measly royalty delivers 33 percent less revenue than it did in 1992. Measly? Yes. A 55-cent royalty was no more than 2.9 percent of the price Sherritt received for the coal it sold from its prairie operations in 2013. 4 WLA | November 2014 | Vol. 22, No. 5 | FEATURES Get Off Coal: A Doctor’s Prescription By Dr. Joe Vipond y most powerful memory conglomeration of pollutants – over 60 at Asthma Society of Canada, and the Pem- of exposure to Alberta’s coal latest count. bina Institute, produced a report called A M fired power generation is So let’s run down the prime suspects in Costly Diagnosis: Subsidizing coal power from a couple of decades ago on my first our pollutant lineup PM 2.5: or particulate with Albertans’ health. Using two well-vali- road trip from Edmonton to Jasper. Hav- matter 2.5 microns, and known to most of dated models, one from the Canadian Med- ing just moved to Edmonton, the iconic us as soot. NOx: this refers to a number of ical Association and one from Environment Yellowhead Highway was new to me… nitrogen/oxygen compounds implicated in Canada, the report calculated the impact of beautiful farmland, rolling aspen park- ozone and acid rain formation. SOx, pri- these emissions on Albertans’ health. The land… and then suddenly the landscape marily sulfur dioxide, is a key generator of numbers were staggering. north of the highway dropped away into a the acidity of acid rain. Ozone, formed from Looking at only two of the pollutants, massive open pit mine. Huh?! My travelling the previous pollutants, visible as smog, ozone and PM 2.5, and at only the respi- companion, very familiar with this route, and a powerful pulmonary toxin (bad for ratory effects, the calculations showed that calmly explained that this was a strip mine our lungs). There’s also a mishmash of or- coal is associated with approximately 100 feeding the nearby electricity plants of Wa- ganic compounds such as furans, dioxins, deaths, 80 hospital admissions, and 4,800 bamun Lake, whose smokestacks we could hydroxychlorobenzene, and polyaromatic asthma days (an asthma day is defined as see nearby. It rattled me… wasn’t Canada’s hydrocarbons. And we shouldn’t forget the a day missed from work or school due to electricity generation primarily hydroelec- heavy metals such as mercury, cadmium, an exacerbation of asthma). The report tric? and arsenic. Our lineup needs a big room calculated that this translates into an extra So began a long learning process into the in the station. 1.7-2.1 cents/kWh in electricity costs to Al- sources of electricity that charges my cell The modern science behind coal’s effects bertans (off the baseline of approximately 6 phone and drives Alberta’s industrial pro- on health goes back to two major health cents/kWh pool price). This costs Alberta cesses. Coal is king of the electricity land- disasters of the mid-20th century. In 1948 taxpayers an extra $300 million dollars per scape in Alberta. In 2012 52 percent of the a major inversion in the steel-producing year. This is undoubtedly a gross underes- electricity used in Alberta came from coal . town of Donora, Pennsylvania killed 20 timation – it doesn’t consider the cardiovas- This translated into burning 20 kilograms people and sickened 7,000 (50 percent of cular and stroke illnesses, intellectual dis- of coal per day for each Albertan, or 6.6 the town) over five days. Then in 1952 the abilities caused by mercury, developmental tonnes per Albertan annually. Or, in total, ironically named “Great Smog” hit Lon- disease, and cancers caused by the various more than the rest of Canada combined. don. That five-day smog, primarily gener- other pollutants. Some incredible statistics. ated from houses using coal for heating, So, where do these illnesses occur? Al- Should we be concerned? Once coal was calculated to have killed 4,000 people berta has 18 generating stations, scattered is scooped out of the ground it must be prematurely and sickened approximately throughout the middle of the province.
Recommended publications
  • Northwest Territories Territoires Du Nord-Ouest British Columbia
    122° 121° 120° 119° 118° 117° 116° 115° 114° 113° 112° 111° 110° 109° n a Northwest Territories i d i Cr r eighton L. T e 126 erritoires du Nord-Oues Th t M urston L. h t n r a i u d o i Bea F tty L. r Hi l l s e on n 60° M 12 6 a r Bistcho Lake e i 12 h Thabach 4 d a Tsu Tue 196G t m a i 126 x r K'I Tue 196D i C Nare 196A e S )*+,-35 125 Charles M s Andre 123 e w Lake 225 e k Jack h Li Deze 196C f k is a Lake h Point 214 t 125 L a f r i L d e s v F Thebathi 196 n i 1 e B 24 l istcho R a l r 2 y e a a Tthe Jere Gh L Lake 2 2 aili 196B h 13 H . 124 1 C Tsu K'Adhe L s t Snake L. t Tue 196F o St.Agnes L. P 1 121 2 Tultue Lake Hokedhe Tue 196E 3 Conibear L. Collin Cornwall L 0 ll Lake 223 2 Lake 224 a 122 1 w n r o C 119 Robertson L. Colin Lake 121 59° 120 30th Mountains r Bas Caribou e e L 118 v ine i 120 R e v Burstall L. a 119 l Mer S 117 ryweather L. 119 Wood A 118 Buffalo Na Wylie L. m tional b e 116 Up P 118 r per Hay R ark of R iver 212 Canada iv e r Meander 117 5 River Amber Rive 1 Peace r 211 1 Point 222 117 M Wentzel L.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazeau Subwatershed
    5.2 BRAZEAU SUBWATERSHED The Brazeau Subwatershed encompasses a biologically diverse area within parts of the Rocky Mountain and Foothills natural regions. The Subwatershed covers 689,198 hectares of land and includes 18,460 hectares of lakes, rivers, reservoirs and icefields. The Brazeau is in the municipal boundaries of Clearwater, Yellowhead and Brazeau Counties. The 5,000 hectare Brazeau Canyon Wildland Provincial Park, along with the 1,030 hectare Marshybank Ecological reserve, established in 1987, lie in the Brazeau Subwatershed. About 16.4% of the Brazeau Subwatershed lies within Banff and Jasper National Parks. The Subwatershed is sparsely populated, but includes the First Nation O’Chiese 203 and Sunchild 202 reserves. Recreation activities include trail riding, hiking, camping, hunting, fishing, and canoeing/kayaking. Many of the indicators described below are referenced from the “Brazeau Hydrological Overview” map locat- ed in the adjacent map pocket, or as a separate Adobe Acrobat file on the CD-ROM. 5.2.1 Land Use Changes in land use patterns reflect major trends in development. Land use changes and subsequent changes in land use practices may impact both the quantity and quality of water in the Subwatershed and in the North Saskatchewan Watershed. Five metrics are used to indicate changes in land use and land use practices: riparian health, linear development, land use, livestock density, and wetland inventory. 5.2.1.1 Riparian Health 55 The health of the riparian area around water bodies and along rivers and streams is an indicator of the overall health of a watershed and can reflect changes in land use and management practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Stewardship in Alberta: a Directory of Stewardship Groups, Support Agencies, and Resources
    WATERSHED STEWARDSHIP IN ALBERTA: A DIRECTORY OF STEWARDSHIP GROUPS, SUPPORT AGENCIES AND RESOURCES APRIL 2005 INTRODUCTION FOREWORD This directory of WATERSHED STEWARDSHIP IN ALBERTA has been designed to begin a process to meet the needs of individuals, stewardship groups, and support agencies (including all levels of government, non- governmental organizations, and industry). From recent workshops, surveys, and consultations, community- based stewards indicated a need to be better connected with other stewards doing similar work and with supporting agencies. They need better access to information, technical assistance, funding sources, and training in recruiting and keeping volunteers. Some groups said they felt isolated and did not have a clear sense that the work they were doing was important and appreciated by society. A number of steps have occurred recently that are beginning to address some of these concerns. The Alberta Stewardship Network, for example, has been established to better connect stewards to each other and to support agencies. Collaboration with other provincial and national networks (e.g. Canada’s Stewardship Communities Network) is occurring on an on-going basis. Internet-based information sites, such as the Stewardship Canada Portal (www.stewardshipcanada.ca), are being established to provide sources of information, linkages to key organizations, and newsletters featuring success stories and progress being made by grassroots stewards. These sites are being connected provincially and nationally to keep people informed with activities across Canada. The focus of this directory is on watershed stewardship groups working in Alberta. The term ‘watershed’ is inclusive of all stewardship activities occurring on the landscape, be they water, air, land, or biodiversity-based.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Structure Plan
    ROBB AREA STRUCTURE PLAN Yellowhead County Invistec Consulting Ltd. 2716 1 AVENUE 10235 101 STREET NW EDSON, ALBERTA T7E 1N9 EDMONTON, ALBERTA T5J 3G1 780-723-4800 780-717-2599 www.yhcounty.ca www.invistec,ca July 2020 THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Project Team would like to thank the community members, organizations, and various stakeholders who contributed to the development of this Area Structure Plan by providing feedback, attending workshops, and sharing their stories. We are excited to see the active participation in implementing the Robb Area Structure Plan. We would also like to thank Yellowhead County Council for their support of the Plan. Finally, we would like to thank the Yellowhead County Planning and Development team and Administration who provided information and participated in the development of this Plan. Ward Councillor Invistec Consulting Ltd. Lavone Olson 4th Floor, 10235 101 Street NW Edmonton, AB, Canada T5J 3G1 Phone: (780) 717-2599 | [email protected] Yellowhead County Staff www.invistec.ca Brent Shepherd | Planning and Development Manager Ostap Fedynets | Planning & Engagement Officer Primary Project Team Tracy Ruszkowski | Planning & Development Officer Stephen Yu, MPlan, RPP, MCIP | Project Manager Kaylyn Stark, BPlan | Engagement Lead Steering Committee Community Members Fabio Coppola, MPlan | Planner Christine Didier Janet Johanson Kevin Hampton Tina Woods ROBB Area Structure Plan I 0.0 Table of Contents 1.0 ROBB was... 3.0 ROBB can be... 1.1 History 1 3.1 Vision Statement 17 1.2 Authorization 1 2.7 3.1.1 Understanding the Vision 1.3 Location 2 3.2 Land Use Policies 18 3.2.1 Hamlet Policies 2.0 ROBB is..
    [Show full text]
  • Published Local Histories
    ALBERTA HISTORIES Published Local Histories assembled by the Friends of Geographical Names Society as part of a Local History Mapping Project (in 1995) May 1999 ALBERTA LOCAL HISTORIES Alphabetical Listing of Local Histories by Book Title 100 Years Between the Rivers: A History of Glenwood, includes: Acme, Ardlebank, Bancroft, Berkeley, Hartley & Standoff — May Archibald, Helen Bircham, Davis, Delft, Gobert, Greenacres, Kia Ora, Leavitt, and Brenda Ferris, e , published by: Lilydale, Lorne, Selkirk, Simcoe, Sterlingville, Glenwood Historical Society [1984] FGN#587, Acres and Empires: A History of the Municipal District of CPL-F, PAA-T Rocky View No. 44 — Tracey Read , published by: includes: Glenwood, Hartley, Hillspring, Lone Municipal District of Rocky View No. 44 [1989] Rock, Mountain View, Wood, FGN#394, CPL-T, PAA-T 49ers [The], Stories of the Early Settlers — Margaret V. includes: Airdrie, Balzac, Beiseker, Bottrell, Bragg Green , published by: Thomasville Community Club Creek, Chestermere Lake, Cochrane, Conrich, [1967] FGN#225, CPL-F, PAA-T Crossfield, Dalemead, Dalroy, Delacour, Glenbow, includes: Kinella, Kinnaird, Thomasville, Indus, Irricana, Kathyrn, Keoma, Langdon, Madden, 50 Golden Years— Bonnyville, Alta — Bonnyville Mitford, Sampsontown, Shepard, Tribune , published by: Bonnyville Tribune [1957] Across the Smoky — Winnie Moore & Fran Moore, ed. , FGN#102, CPL-F, PAA-T published by: Debolt & District Pioneer Museum includes: Bonnyville, Moose Lake, Onion Lake, Society [1978] FGN#10, CPL-T, PAA-T 60 Years: Hilda’s Heritage,
    [Show full text]
  • Cardinal River Coals Ltd. Transalta Utilities Corporation Cheviot Coal Project
    Decision 97-08 Cardinal River Coals Ltd. TransAlta Utilities Corporation Cheviot Coal Project June 1997 Alberta Energy and Utilities Board ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD Decision 97-08: Cardinal River Coals Ltd. TransAlta Utilities Corporation Cheviot Coal Project Published by Alberta Energy and Utilities Board 640 – 5 Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 3G4 Telephone: (403) 297-8311 Fax: (403) 297-7040 Web site: www.eub.gov.ab.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................1 1.1 Project Summary ..................................................1 1.2 Approval Process ..................................................2 1.2.1 Coal Development Policy for Alberta (1976) ......................3 1.2.2 Alberta Environmental Protection ...............................3 1.2.3 Alberta Energy and Utilities Board ..............................4 1.2.4 Federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans/ Federal Department of the Environment/ Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency ......................4 1.3 Public Review Processes ............................................5 1.3.1 EUB Review Process .........................................5 1.3.2 Joint Review Panel Process ....................................5 1.3.3 Public Hearing ..............................................6 1.3.4 Decision–Making Process .....................................6 1.4 Public Consultation Process ..........................................6 1.4.1 AEP and EUB Requirements ...................................6 1.4.2 CEAA Requirements
    [Show full text]
  • Contrary to Popular Belief, Coal Is Alive in Canada — but We Can Change That - Ipolitics
    8/11/2021 Contrary to popular belief, coal is alive in Canada — but we can change that - iPolitics (https://ipolitics.ca/) SUBSCRIBE (HTTPS://IPOLITICS.CA/SUBSCRIBE) OPINIONS Contrary to popular belief, coal is alive in Canada — but we can change that By David Khan (https://ipolitics.ca/author/david-khan/). Published on Feb 26, 2021 4:08pm 'Despite Ottawa’s very public promises to “power past” thermal coal and phase out coal-powered electricity in Canada, we continue to mine it here in Alberta and sell it to the world.' Coal (Dexter Frenandes/Pexel photo) Email (mailto:?subject=I want you to Facebook read this article [Contrary to popular (https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php? text=Contrary+to+popular+belief%2C+coal+is+a belief, coal is alive in Canada — but we u=https://ipolitics.ca/2021/02/26/contrary-to- can change that]&body=Check out this popular-belief-coal-is-alive-in-canada-but-we- article: can-change-that/) https://ipolitics.ca/2021/02/26/contrary- to-popular-belief-coal-is-alive-in- canada-but-we-can-change-that/.) Recently, cattle ranchers, environmental activists, members of the Blood Tribe and Siksika Nation — and even a couple country singers — came together to oppose the Alberta government’s decision to quietly rescind the 1976 Coal Policy (https://www.alberta.ca/coal-policy-guidelines.aspx). It was an inspiring Albertan story — a prime example of the do-it-yourself attitude Albertans take pride in. Together, the First Nations, ranchers, environmentalists, musicians, and other Albertans spoke against a decision that left iconic Rocky Mountain peaks open to destructive mining practices, and risked poisoning watersheds that drain into the rest of the province and beyond via rivers across Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and the Northwest Territories.
    [Show full text]
  • Cadomin and Jasper Areas Willem Langenberg and John Waldron
    Field Guide to Selected Geological Sections of the Cadomin and Jasper Areas Willem Langenberg and John Waldron Edmonton Geological Society Field Trip Guide September 22-23, 2007 Introduction The Rocky Mountains can be divided into Foothills, Front Ranges, and Main Ranges as shown in the cartoon below (Fig. 1). Outcrops in the foothills are dominated by softer weathering Mesozoic rocks of the foreland basin: mainly sandstone and shale but also including conglomerates and coal. Most of the clastic rocks represent material eroded from earlier-formed parts of the orogen to the west, which was subsequently cannibalized as the thrustbelt advanced westward in late Mesozoic to early Cenozoic time. Locally in the foothills, the more resistant late Paleozoic carbonate rocks come to the surface in elongated ridges. Saturday's traverse will begin in the foothills of the Cadomin area and proceed southwest into the Front Ranges. In the Front Ranges carbonates dominate the landscape. These represent the late Paleozoic continental margin of the Laurentian continent, now sliced into multiple imbricated thrust sheets. Mesozoic clastics are confined to narrow valleys. On Sunday morning we will take the Yellowhead Highway further into the Front Ranges and eventually into the Main Ranges of the Rockies. In the Main Ranges, lower parts of the stratigraphy are preserved, including widespread outcrops of older, Early Paleozoic carbonates, clastics, and the underlying Proterozoic succession of the Windermere Supergroup. The structural style is different, too. Although thrust sheets are present, they are generally much larger in scale, and their dips are gentler. In addition, the rocks were more ductile when deformed, so that cleavage and folds are much more widely developed in the mudrocks.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Municipal Codes
    2017 Municipal Codes Updated December 22, 2017 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] 2017 MUNICIPAL CHANGES STATUS CHANGES: 0315 - The Village of Thorsby became the Town of Thorsby (effective January 1, 2017). NAME CHANGES: 0315- The Town of Thorsby (effective January 1, 2017) from Village of Thorsby. AMALGAMATED: FORMATIONS: DISSOLVED: 0038 –The Village of Botha dissolved and became part of the County of Stettler (effective September 1, 2017). 0352 –The Village of Willingdon dissolved and became part of the County of Two Hills (effective September 1, 2017). CODE NUMBERS RESERVED: 4737 Capital Region Board 0522 Metis Settlements General Council 0524 R.M. of Brittania (Sask.) 0462 Townsite of Redwood Meadows 5284 Calgary Regional Partnership STATUS CODES: 01 Cities (18)* 15 Hamlet & Urban Services Areas (396) 09 Specialized Municipalities (5) 20 Services Commissions (71) 06 Municipal Districts (64) 25 First Nations (52) 02 Towns (108) 26 Indian Reserves (138) 03 Villages (87) 50 Local Government Associations (22) 04 Summer Villages (51) 60 Emergency Districts (12) 07 Improvement Districts (8) 98 Reserved Codes (5) 08 Special Areas (3) 11 Metis Settlements (8) * (Includes Lloydminster) December 22, 2017 Page 1 of 13 CITIES CODE CITIES CODE NO. NO. Airdrie 0003 Brooks 0043 Calgary 0046 Camrose 0048 Chestermere 0356 Cold Lake 0525 Edmonton 0098 Fort Saskatchewan 0117 Grande Prairie 0132 Lacombe 0194 Leduc 0200 Lethbridge 0203 Lloydminster* 0206 Medicine Hat 0217 Red Deer 0262 Spruce Grove 0291 St. Albert 0292 Wetaskiwin 0347 *Alberta only SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Emission Abatement Potential for the Alberta Oil Sands Industry and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Applicability to Coal-Fired Electricity Generation and Oil Sands
    Canadian Energy Research Institute Emission Abatement Potential for the Alberta Oil Sands Industry and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Applicability to Coal-Fired Electricity Generation and Oil Sands Zoey Walden Study No. 126 October 2011 Relevant • Independent • Objective EMISSION ABATEMENT POTENTIAL FOR THE ALBERTA OIL SANDS INDUSTRY AND CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE (CCS) APPLICABILITY TO COAL-FIRED ELECTRICITY GENERATION AND OIL SANDS Emission Abatement Potential for the Alberta Oil Sands Industry and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Applicability to Coal-Fired Electricity Generation and Oil Sands Copyright © Canadian Energy Research Institute, 2011 Sections of this study may be reproduced in magazines and newspapers with acknowledgement to the Canadian Energy Research Institute ISBN 1-927037-03-4 Author: Zoey Walden Acknowledgements: The author of this report would like to extend thanks and gratitude to everyone involved in the production and editing of the material, including, but not limited to Carlos Murillo, Afshin Honarvar, Dinara Millington, Jon Rozhon, Thorn Walden, Peter Howard and most notably Megan Murphy. CANADIAN ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE 150, 3512 – 33 Street NW Calgary, Alberta T2L 2A6 Canada www.ceri.ca October 2011 Printed in Canada Emission Abatement Potential for the Alberta Oil Sands Industry and Carbon Capture iii and Storage (CCS) Applicability to Coal-Fired Electricity Generation and Oil Sands Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply Assessment for the North Saskatchewan River Basin
    WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT FOR THE NORTH SASKATCHEWAN RIVER BASIN Report submitted to: North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance DISTRIBUTION: 3 Copies North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance Edmonton, Alberta 4 Copies Golder Associates Ltd. Calgary, Alberta March 2008 08-1337-0001 March 2008 -i- 08-1337-0001 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In an Agreement dated 22 January 2008, the North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance (NSWA) contracted Golder Associates Limited (Golder) to assess the water supply and its variability in the North Saskatchewan River Basin (NSRB) under natural hydrologic conditions and present climatic conditions. The NSRB was divided into seven (7) hydrologic regions to account for the spatial variability in factors influencing water yield. The hydrologic regions were delineated such that the hydrologic responses were essentially similar within each region, but different from region to region. The annual yield for each hydrologic region was estimated as the average of the annual yields of gauged watersheds located completely within the hydrologic region, if available. Thirty-four hydrometric stations within the NSRB were included in the analysis. For the assessment of natural water yield, only those data series or portions thereof that have been collected under natural flow conditions were considered. A key aspect of the water yield assessment in the NSRB was the estimation of water yield in watersheds with non-contributing areas. The calculation of water yield for each hydrologic region and sub-basins in the NSRB was based on the effective drainage areas of gauged watersheds and on effective drainage areas within each hydrologic region or sub-basin. The non- contributing areas as delineated by the Prairie Farm and Rehabilitation Administration (PFRA) of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) for the NSRB were used.
    [Show full text]
  • Graveyards of Industry – Exploring the Effects of a Resource-Reliant
    Graveyards of Industry – Exploring the effects of a resource-reliant economy on the towns of early Alberta Aaron Kyle Lang – [email protected] Website: http://www.ghosttownsofcanada.com/ Summary This research focuses on Western Alberta’s ghost towns, and how resource focused economies have led to the formation, the prosperity, and eventually the demise of these now desolate localities. This project investigates the local geology, socio-economic climate, and broader historical events that have shaped these areas, and how it has impacted modern life and industrial activity. The areas explored were mostly coal-based economies, which include the Alberta Coal Branch, Banff National Park, Crowsnest Pass, Kananaskis, and Southern Alberta. The findings from this research highlight that rapid changes in technology and relying on a single industry to maintain economic activity will result in the creation of a ghost town. The extent the localities have changed in recent years has dramatically varied based on its value to locals, industry, and the government. Introduction Alberta has always been reliant on its abundant natural resources, such as coal and oil. However, in a fast- changing world with the prominence of modern issues such as climate change and renewable energies, we must look to history to examine what has happened in the past to understand the future. To do this, there must be a careful study of the epitaphs of Alberta's rich industrial history to find the warning signs of the adverse effects of a region relying on one industry. We must understand the ghost towns of Alberta. A ghost town in the Alberta context is a locality that experienced a period of rapid growth due to the economic advantages of a single-resource based or agrarian economy, which provided access to amenities required for a healthy municipality, such as hotels, restaurants, general stores, and hospitals.
    [Show full text]